Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Elevated Serum Triglyceride and Retinol-Binding Protein 4 Levels Associated with Fructose-Sweetened Beverages in Adolescents

  • Te-Fu Chan,

    Affiliations Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Wei-Ting Lin,

    Affiliation Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Yi-Ling Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Hsiao-Ling Huang,

    Affiliation Department of Oral Hygiene, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Wei-Zeng Yang,

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Chun-Ying Lee,

    Affiliations Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Meng-Hsueh Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Tsu-Nai Wang,

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Meng-Chuan Huang,

    Affiliations Department of Public Health and Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Yu-Wen Chiu,

    Affiliation Health Policy and Systems Management Program, Health Sciences Center, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America

  • Chun-Chi Huang,

    Affiliation Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Sharon Tsai,

    Affiliation Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Chih-Lung Lin , (CLL); (CHL)

    Affiliation Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Chien-Hung Lee (CLL); (CHL)

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan



The metabolic effect of fructose in sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) has been linked to de novo lipogenesis and uric acid (UA) production.


This study investigated the biological effects of SSB consumption on serum lipid profiles and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) among Taiwanese adolescents.


We evaluated the anthropometric parameters and biochemical outcomes of 200 representative adolescents (98 boys and 102 girls) who were randomly selected from a large-scale cross-sectional study. Data were analyzed using multiple regression models adjusted for covariates.


Increased SSB consumption was associated with increased waist and hip circumferences, body mass index (BMI) values and serum UA, triglyceride (TG) and RBP4 levels. Adolescents who consumed >500 ml/day of beverages half-to-heavily sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) exhibited TG and RBP4 levels 22.7 mg/dl and 13.92 ng/ml higher than non-drinkers, respectively. HFCS drinkers with hyperuricemia had higher TG levels than HFCS drinkers with normal UA levels (98.6 vs. 81.6 mg/dl). The intake of HFCS-rich SSBs and high value of BMI (≥24) interactively reinforced RBP4 levels among overweight/obese adolescents. Circulating RBP4 levels were significantly correlated with weight-related outcomes and TG and UA concentration among HFCS drinkers (r = 0.253 to 0.404), but not among non-drinkers.


High-quantity HFCS-rich beverage consumption is associated with higher TG and RBP4 levels. Hyperuricemia is likely to intensify the influence of HFCS-rich SSB intake on elevated TG levels, and in overweight and obese adolescents, high BMI may modify the action of fructose on higher circulating levels of RBP4.


Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4)—the single specific transporter of vitamin A in blood—is a lipocalin-family protein secreted by mature adipocytes and activated macrophages in adipose tissue [1], [2]. Biochemical investigations of lean, obese and diabetic participants have demonstrated that the concentration of serum RBP4 increases before frank diabetes develops [3]. In insulin-resistant condition, the expression of the insulin-stimulated glucose-transporter 4 (GLUT4) is selectively reduced in adipocytes [4]. Animal studies have shown that serum RBP4 levels are elevated in the adipose tissue of mice with genetic knockout of adipose-specific GLUT4 [5]. In participants with various clinical presentations, serum RBP4 has been positively correlated with insulin resistance and is an important adipokine associated with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular complications [3], [6][9]. Recent studies have suggested that RBP4 may produce a molecular connection between obesity and insulin resistance [10].

Epidemiological data from large cross-sectional investigations and well-powered prospective studies have revealed that the upsurge in obese children and adults is associated with increasing levels of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake [11], [12]. Sugar consumption from beverages in several populations contributes more than 15% to dietary energy [13][15]. The World Health Organization suggests that this level should not exceed 10% [16]. Although the American Heart Association recommends that added sugar consumption should not exceed 80 kcal/day for women and 150 kcal/day for men [17], recent reports have determined that daily caloric intake from SSBs in US children from 1999 to 2004 was 242 kcal/day for girls and 357 kcal/day for boys [18]. In overweight and obese adults, the metabolic effects of fructose in SSBs have been shown to increase the accumulation of visceral adipose tissue and induce hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and high lipid profile levels [19], [20]. Compared with glucose-sweetened beverages, consuming fructose-sweetened beverages has been linked to a higher circulating level of uric acid, RBP4 and gamma-glutamyl transferase activity in adults with body mass index (BMI) values of 25 to 35 kg/m2 [21]. However, it is unclear whether the metabolic effect of SSBs extends to adolescents.

Between 1980 and 1996, the prevalence of adolescent obesity in Taiwan has increased by 25.8% in boys and 27.7% in girls [22]. A recent study found that 87.7% of adolescents in Taiwan ingest at least one SSB serving per week, and that consuming high fructose-containing beverages has a significant effect on increased levels of BMI and serum uric acid (UA) [23]. The national Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan found that 59.8% and 30.3% of male and female teenagers aged between 13 and 18 years had hyperuricemia [24]. These findings emphasize the importance of investigating the obesity and hyperuricemia-related metabolic effects of SSB intake in Taiwanese adolescents.

This study investigates the biological effect of SSB intake on serum lipid profiles and RBP4. It also examines the interactive effects of fructose-rich beverage consumption, excessive body weight and hyperuricemia on clinical outcomes among Taiwanese adolescents.



To evaluate SSB-associated metabolic effects, 200 adolescents (98 boys and 102 girls) aged between 12 and 16 years were randomly selected from the SSB consumption group of a large-scale representative study conducted to monitor Multilevel Risk Profiles for Adolescent Metabolic Syndrome (mRP-aMS) in urban, suburban and rural areas of Southern Taiwan [23]. The mRP-aMS study included 3784 randomly selected students from 36 junior high schools. A detailed description of the study can be found in Lin et al [23]. Because acute illness, injury and liver and renal failure may affect serum RBP4 [9], adolescents with these conditions were excluded from the study. In this investigation, participants were randomly selected from the non-consumption (n = 40), 1-to-350-ml/day consumption (n = 40), 351-to-500-ml/day consumption (n = 40), 501-to-750-ml/day consumption (n = 40) and >750-ml/day consumption (n = 40) of SSBs groups. Because the effects of consuming 1 to 350 ml/day and 351 to 500 ml/day of SSBs were similar, we combined the two groups in data analyses. The Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University reviewed and approved the research, which was conducted in accordance with their guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and guardians/caretakers on the behalf of the participants before their inclusion in the study.

Data Collection

Class teachers and two research staff members used a developed structured questionnaire to collect research data, including demographic factors, personal disease history, lifestyle behaviors, dietary intake, physical activity, and smoking, alcohol consumption and betel-quid chewing status. Daily dietary intake of 23 food groups during the previous month was assessed for each participant using the semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire. The Taiwanese Food and Nutrient Databank, created by the national Food and Drug Administration, was used to estimate daily total calories according to the food intake information [25]. Data on physical activity in a representative week were also collected and converted into metabolic equivalent task (MET) minutes per week by multiplying the MET level of activity by the minutes of activity per day multiplied by the number of days per week [23]. The total MET-minutes per week were estimated by adding the calculated values of all activities. Adolescents were grouped into three categories based on their total physical activity tercile. Tobacco and alcohol use were defined as having one or more cigarettes and alcoholic drinks in the previous month, respectively.

The food-frequency questionnaire was used to obtain information on SSB intake, including soft drinks, fruit drinks and sweetened tea. SSB non-drinkers were defined as adolescents who consumed no more than one serving of any SSB per week. Total SSB consumption per day was calculated and classified according to a typical serving size in Taiwan. Adolescents consume two main types of SSBs. The first are hand-shaken sugar-containing drinks (HSDs), which are instant SSBs sold in hand-shaken beverage shops. Commonly consumed HSDs include green tea, bubble black tea, pearl milk tea and boba milk tea. Because this type of SSB is only sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS; mainly HFCS-55), they are referred to as HFCS-sweetened beverages. Bottled sugar-containing drinks (BSDs) are the second type of SSB. Manufacturers decide how much sugar is added to BSDs. Granulated sugar (sucrose) is the primary caloric BSD sweetener, however certain BSDs use HFCS or a mixture of HFCS and granulated sugar. This type of SSB is referred to as a mixed sugar-sweetened BSD. In Taiwanese hand-shaken beverage shops, customers can select the sweetness of their HSD, thus HSDs are further categorized as slightly, half and heavily HFCS-sweetened drinks. A 750-ml slightly, half and heavily sweetened green tea and bubble black tea contain approximately 17, 25 and 50 ml (22, 34 and 68 g) HFCS, respectively.

Anthropometric Measurement

Trained and certified researchers conducted anthropometric measurements using a standardized procedure after questionnaire data collection. Parameters measured included height, weight, waist and hip circumference, body fat and blood pressure. Body fat percentage was identified using a body impedance technique (BF-800, Tanita Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and participant BMI was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2). BMI values were used to determine overweight (≥24 to <27 kg/m2) and obese (≥27 kg/m2) participants according to the criteria defined by the Department of Health, Executive Yuan of Taiwan [26].

Clinical Measurement

Blood samples were collected from adolescents after three weeks of data collection and anthropometric measurements. Research specimens were obtained in the morning by venipuncture after a 10-hour overnight fast. Lipid profile concentrations, including total cholesterol, triglycerides (TGs), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, were enzymatically measured by a chemistry auto-analyzer using commercially available reagents (TBA-c16000 automatic analyzer, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) [27]. The serum UA level was analyzed using an enzymatic colorimetric assay that uses the enzyme uricase to oxidize UA and produce allantoin and hydrogen peroxide [28]. Adolescent boys and girls with UA levels ≥7 mg/dl and ≥6 mg/dl, respectively, were defined as hyperuricemia [29]. The serum RBP4 concentration was quantitatively determined using an ELISA kit K6110 according to manufacturer standards (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany). RBP4 levels in the samples were quantified by referring their optical density at 450 nm to a Lot-dependent master calibration curve and using a calibrator with each test. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 5% and 9.8%, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the association of SSB consumption with anthropometric and clinical parameters. Multivariate-adjusted differences (that is, partial regression coefficients) were used to assess the effect of SSB consumption level on continuous outcomes. In these models, multivariate-adjusted means reflect the estimated predictions when covariates were set as mean values. A basic regression model including age, gender and study area was used to appraise potential confounders. Variables that altered the effect of interest by >10% or that had been established as confounders by previous studies were regarded as confounding factors [30], [31]. Pearson's correlation tests were used to examine the possible linear association of RBP4 with anthropometric and clinical parameters among adolescents who consumed different types of SSBs. Cross-product terms of explanatory variables were introduced into multiple regression models to evaluate the interaction effects of SSB intake, overweight/obesity and hyperuricemia on serum TG and RBP4 levels.


Table 1 shows participant background data, including demographic, dietary and physical factors, by SSB consumption group. Participants who ingested more SSBs tend to be boys, consume more calories and are more likely to drink alcohol. In adolescents who consumed >750 ml/day of SSBs, 67.5% drank half or heavily HFCS-sweetened HSDs, and 50% of adolescents who consumed <500 ml/day drank mixed sugar-sweetened BSDs.

Table 1. Demographic, dietary and physical factors associated with consumption of sugar-sweetened beverage in adolescents.

Table 2 shows the multivariate-adjusted differences in anthropometric and metabolic parameters associated with SSB consumption. High-amount SSB intake (>750 ml/day) was related to high weight and waist and hip circumferences (P<0.05), and increased SSB intake was linked to increased BMI values; serum UA, TG and RBP4 levels; overweight/obesity percentages and hyperuricemia (P for trend <0.05). Adolescents who consumed >750 ml/day of SSBs had UA, TG and RPB4 concentrations 1.28 mg/dl, 30.28 mg/dl and 15.87 ng/ml more than non-drinkers, respectively. All SSB drinkers had higher mean levels of RBP4 (11.59 to 15.87 ng/ml increases in mean).

Table 2. Multivariate-adjusted differencesa in anthropometric and metabolic parameters associated with sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in adolescents.

Table 3 shows the influence of the type of SSB consumed on TG and RBP4 levels. Drinkers of half-to-heavily HFCS-sweetened HSDs had multivariate and BMI-adjusted TG levels 19.46 mg/dl higher than non-drinkers. Adolescents who consumed HFCS-sweetened HSDs (11.96 to 12.33 ng/ml increases) and mixed sugar-sweetened BSDs (12.59 ng/ml increase) had increased RBP4 levels after accounting for the effects of BMI and UA.

Table 3. Multivariate-adjusted differences in triglyceride and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) associated with the type of sugar-sweetened beverage consumed by adolescents.

The combined effects of the type and the amount of SSBs consumed on metabolic outcomes are shown in Table 4. Although all SSB drinkers showed higher TG levels, only drinkers with a daily intake of >500 ml half-to-heavy HSDs showed a significant increase (22.7 mg/dl). BMI accounted for 5.1% of the effect in this group of SSB consumers (Model IIA) and UA explained 32.6% of the effect (Model IIB). Allowing for the covariates considered, a 13.92 and 18.52 ng/ml higher RBP4 level was identified among adolescents who drank >500 ml/day of half-to-heavily HFCS-sweetened HSDs and mixed sugar-sweetened BSDs than non-drinkers, respectively. UA affected RBP4 more than BMI among high-quantity (>500 ml) HFCS-rich (half-to-heavy) HSD drinkers and BSD drinkers (2.4% and 3.0−3.7% of effect changes for BMI in Model IIA, and 9.0% and 7.9−8.9% of effect changes for UA in Model IIB, were respectively detected among the two groups of SSB drinkers).

Table 4. Multivariate-adjusted differences in triglyceride and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) associated with the type and amount of sugar-sweetened beverage consumed by adolescents.

Figure 1 shows the interactive effects of SSB consumption, overweight/obesity and hyperuricemia on serum TG and RBP4 levels. Compared with non-drinkers (68.5 mg/dl), HFCS-sweetened HSD drinkers with normal UA levels (81.6 mg/dl) and hyperuricemia (98.6 mg/dl) exhibited higher TG concentrations, and the TG circulating level was significantly higher in HSD drinkers with hyperuricemia than without (P<0.05). In adolescents with a BMI<24 kg/m2, consumption of HFCS-sweetened HSDs was associated with a 10.8 ng/ml significant increase in RBP4 levels as compared to non-drinkers, and in adolescents with a BMI≥24 kg/m2, the increase was interactively boosted to 15.1 ng/ml (P for interaction = 0.037). The effect of hyperuricemia on the increase in serum RBP4 levels in relation to the two types of SSB intake was limited. A comparable effect was observed among adolescents with and without hyperuricemia with an adjusted mean of 33.0 to 33.5 ng/ml and 31.3 to 32.2 ng/ml, respectively. The waist circumference was 67.7 and 68.0 cm for non-drinkers, 66.4 and 83.8 cm for HFCS drinkers, and 90.4 and 85.3 cm for mixed-sugar drinkers with a BMI<24 and ≥24 kg/m2, respectively.

Figure 1. Interactive effects of the type of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumed, overweight/obesity and hyperuricemia on: (A) serum triglyceride (TG) and (B) retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) levels.

Note: SSB groups were classified as non-intake, high-fructose corn syrup-containing drinks (HFCS drink) and sucrose/HFCS-mixed sugar-containing drinks (Mixed-sugar drink). Overweight (BMI≥24 to <27 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI≥27 kg/m2) are determined according to the criteria defined by the Department of Health, Executive Yuan of Taiwan. The multivariate-adjusted means were obtained using a linear regression model adjusted for age, gender, study area, physical activity, total calories, alcohol drinking and cigarette smoking, and where appropriate, the levels of serum uric acid and body mass index (BMI). * denotes a significant adjusted-mean difference as compared to the reference mean (P<0.05). ??? denotes a significant interaction effect on RBP4 levels that was detected among adolescents with overweight/obesity and consuming HFCS drinks (P for interaction = 0.037). The waist circumference was 67.7 and 68.0 cm for non-drinkers, 66.4 and 83.8 cm for HFCS drinkers, and 90.4 and 85.3 cm for mixed-sugar drinkers with a BMI<24 and ≥24 kg/m2, respectively.

The correlation of serum RBP4 levels with anthropometric and metabolic outcomes in different SSB consumption groups is shown in Table 5. In SSB non-drinkers, no parameters were linearly related to RBP4 levels. However, in HSD drinkers, RBP4 levels were correlated with waist circumference, body fat, BMI, UA and TG (correlation coefficient r, 0.253 to 0.404, P<0.05). By contrast, only the linear relationship between UA and RBP4 levels was noteworthy in the BSD group (r = 0.307).

Table 5. Correlations of retinol-binding protein 4 (ng/ml) with anthropometric and metabolic outcomes associated with the type of sugar-sweetened beverage consumed by adolescents.


This study investigates SSB consumption in adolescents aged between 12 and 16 years in urban, suburban and rural areas of Southern Taiwan. The results demonstrate that the intake of SSB was related to an increase in serum TG and RBP4 levels. Consuming HFCS-rich HSDs was significantly associated with increased TG levels, and serum UA contributed to this effect. HFCS-sweetened and mixed sugar-sweetened beverage consumption was linked to a higher RBP4 level. Furthermore, consuming HFCS-rich beverages and BMI values interactively reinforced serum RBP levels among overweight/obese adolescents.

Hepatic glucose metabolism is restrained by cytosolic ATP and citrate levels when energy conditions are high. By contrast, hepatic fructose metabolism is unrelated to energy conditions, therefore the hepatic uptake of dietary fructose and the metabolism of fructose to DNL substrates are unrestricted [32]. Human studies accounting for energy-balanced feeding have demonstrated that prolonged fructose—but not glucose—ingestion increases hepatic fractional DNL and reduces postheparin lipoprotein lipase [20], [21]. For TG production in the liver, elevated fructose-induced DNL supplies endogenous fatty acids and increases the intrahepatic availability of fatty acids by limiting the entry of fatty acid into the mitochondria by producing malonyl-CoA [20]. Reducing plasma TG clearance because of decreased lipoprotein lipase levels may also contribute to fructose-induced hypertriglyceridemia [20], [33]. Recent dietary SSB trials have shown that consuming fructose for 6 to 8 weeks at 17% to 25% of energy requirements increases the postprandial and daily TG concentration more than consuming isocaloric glucose among adults [20], [34]. This study identified a higher BMI-adjusted fasting TG level among adolescents who consumed half-to-heavily sweetened HFCS beverages (19.46 mg/dl increase) than among those who consumed mixed sugar-sweetened beverages (0.76 mg/dl increase).

Monosaccharide fructose is the only carbohydrate that increases serum UA levels by activating the fructokinase pathway and degrading the purine nucleotide [35] and by upregulating de novo purine nucleotide synthesis in hepatocytes [36]. This study found that adolescents who consumed >500 ml/day of half-to-heavily sweetened HFCS beverages had a TG concentration 22.70 mg/dl higher than non-drinkers, and UA levels explained 32.6% of this increase. On the other hand, HFCS-rich HSD drinkers and mixed sugar BSD drinkers with hyperuricemia both had a noticeably higher TG level than those drinkers with normal UA levels (Figure 1, 98.6 vs. 81.6 mg/dl in HFCS-rich drinkers, and 84.9 vs. 61.6 mg/dl in mixed sugar drinkers, both P<0.05). A significant positive correlation between UA and TG levels was also identified among HSD drinkers (r = 0.295, P = 0.003) and among BSD drinkers (r = 0.360, P = 0.005), but not among non-drinkers (r = 0.274, P = 0.087, data not shown). These findings demonstrated an association between circulating UA and TG levels among adolescents who consumed SSB beverages (HFCS-rich HSD and mixed sugar BSD beverages). A recent biomedical experiment demonstrated that UA up-regulates fructokinase expression and augments the lipogenic effects induced by fructose in human hepatocytes [37]. It also showed that constraining UA production substantially restrains the accumulation of fructose-induced TG [37]. Studies have suggested that fructose-induced hyperuricemia may mediate certain abnormalities related to cardiometabolic risk factors, such as hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension and insulin resistance [21], [38].

Transgenic animal experiments have demonstrated that reduced expression of adipose-specific GLUT4 increases circulating RBP4 levels in adipose tissue, and that increased RBP4 expression promotes hepatic glucose production by activating phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and impairs insulin signaling in muscle [3], [5]. Increased serum RBP4 levels in humans are associated with obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease [3], [6][9]. Furthermore, decreased plasma RBP4 levels have been identified in patients with specific medical interventions, such as diet, exercise, oral antidiabetic drugs and hypolipidemic agents [3], [9]. A study of adults linked prolonged dietary intake of fructose to higher serum RBP4 levels [21]. Using three SSB consumer groups (non-drinkers, 1−500 ml/day and >500 ml/day drinkers) for evaluation, this study demonstrates that a dose-response relationship between SSB intake and circulating RBP4 levels exists in adolescents, regardless of the type of SSB consumed. This dietary factor is also a major contributor to several cardiorenal diseases [38][40].

A recent dietary SSB intervention study of overweight and obese participants showed that consuming fructose-sweetened beverages at 25% of energy requirements for 10 weeks promotes hepatic DNL and increases intra-abdominal fat accumulation [20]. In humans, RBP4 expression is associated with larger adipocytes, and visceral adipose tissue exhibits a higher RBP4 concentration than subcutaneous adipose tissue [41]. This study shows that the effect of HFCS-sweetened HSD consumption on increased serum RBP4 levels was significantly strengthened among overweight/obese adolescents than among normal weight adolescents (RBP4 = 35.4 ng/ml, compared to 31.1 ng/ml, P for interaction = 0.037, Figure 1). Biomedical studies have suggested that decreasing GLUT4 expression in adipose tissue and increasing TG deposition into visceral adipose tissue may be the mechanism through which fructose exerts these effects [20], [21]. This study shows that the waist circumferences of HFCS HSD drinkers with BMIs≥24 kg/m2 (90.4 cm) were considerably higher than those of non-drinkers with BMIs<24 kg/m2 (67.7 cm).

Our findings show that circulating RBP4 levels are significantly correlated with waist circumference, body fat, BMI and serum TG levels among HFCS-sweetened HSD drinkers, but not among mixed sugar-sweetened BSD drinkers and non-drinkers. In this study, the body-weight-associated parameter values of adolescents who consumed HFCS-rich beverages were higher than those of adolescents who consumed mixed-sugar beverages. HSD drinkers also had a higher circulating level of TG than did BSD drinkers. In epidemiological studies, increased serum RBP4 levels have been linked to obesity and increased serum TG levels [41], [42]. These findings partly explain why the relationships between RBP4 and body-weight-related variables and TG are evident in the HSD drinkers but not in the BSD drinkers. Our results support the previously proposed hypothesis that high fructose consumption has a significant effect on the association of RBP4 with obesity and TG. [20], [21]. Alternatively, similar to findings from patients with type 2 diabetes [43], [44], a significant linear relationship exists between serum RBP4 and UA levels among healthy adolescents who consumed HFCS-rich HSD beverages (r = 0.253) and mixed sugar BSD beverages (r = 0.307). RBP4 is a novel cardiometabolic risk factor [9], and fructose-derived hyperuricemia may be a critical intermediate agent for the abnormalities of cardiometabolic risk factor [21], [38]. These findings emphasize the importance of SSB consumption on the adverse effects of cardiometabolic disease.

The results of this study are subject to certain limitations. Although it is improbable that the reported SSB consumption was biased by participant knowledge of identified UA levels (because clinical blood examinations were conducted 3 weeks after data collection), the cross-sectional nature of this study precludes any causal interpretations. Because anthropometric and clinical outcomes were measured only once, this investigation only presents a snapshot of serum lipid profile and RBP4 in the study participants. The main strength of this investigation is that it is the first study to report the association between SSB intake and circulating RBP4 levels among healthy adolescents. Because serum RBP4 is also affected by a number of non-metabolic circumstances, such as acute illness, injury, liver and renal failure [9], respondents with these conditions were precluded from the study. Furthermore, all of the evaluations considered critical confounding factors.

In conclusion, high-quantity (>500 ml) HFCS-rich (half-to-heavy) beverage intake is associated with higher TG levels, and serum UA may be connected with this increase. Hyperuricemia is likely to intensify the effect of HFCS-rich SSB intake on elevated TG levels, and being overweight/obesity may modify the action of fructose on higher circulating levels of RBP4.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TFC CLL CHL. Performed the experiments: WTL YLC HLH WZY CYL MHC MCH TNW YWC CCH ST. Analyzed the data: WTL CHL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TFC YLC. Wrote the paper: TFC CHL.


  1. 1. Friebe D, Neef M, Erbs S, Dittrich K, Kratzsch J, et al. (2011) Retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) is primarily associated with adipose tissue mass in children. Int J Pediatr Obes 6: e345–352.
  2. 2. Broch M, Ramirez R, Auguet MT, Alcaide MJ, Aguilar C, et al. (2010) Macrophages are novel sites of expression and regulation of retinol binding protein-4 (RBP4). Physiol Res 59: 299–303.
  3. 3. Graham TE, Yang Q, Bluher M, Hammarstedt A, Ciaraldi TP, et al. (2006) Retinol-binding protein 4 and insulin resistance in lean, obese, and diabetic subjects. N Engl J Med 354: 2552–2563.
  4. 4. Shepherd PR, Kahn BB (1999) Glucose transporters and insulin action–implications for insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 341: 248–257.
  5. 5. Yang Q, Graham TE, Mody N, Preitner F, Peroni OD, et al. (2005) Serum retinol binding protein 4 contributes to insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Nature 436: 356–362.
  6. 6. Alkharfy KM, Al-Daghri NM, Vanhoutte PM, Krishnaswamy S, Xu A (2012) Serum retinol-binding protein 4 as a marker for cardiovascular disease in women. PLoS One 7: e48612.
  7. 7. Cabre A, Lazaro I, Girona J, Manzanares J, Marimon F, et al. (2007) Retinol-binding protein 4 as a plasma biomarker of renal dysfunction and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. J Intern Med 262: 496–503.
  8. 8. Ingelsson E, Sundstrom J, Melhus H, Michaelsson K, Berne C, et al. (2009) Circulating retinol-binding protein 4, cardiovascular risk factors and prevalent cardiovascular disease in elderly. Atherosclerosis 206: 239–244.
  9. 9. Christou GA, Tselepis AD, Kiortsis DN (2012) The metabolic role of retinol binding protein 4: an update. Horm Metab Res 44: 6–14.
  10. 10. Wolf G (2007) Serum retinol-binding protein: a link between obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Nutr Rev 65: 251–256.
  11. 11. Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB (2006) Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 84: 274–288.
  12. 12. Hu FB, Malik VS (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: epidemiologic evidence. Physiol Behav 100: 47–54.
  13. 13. Guthrie JF, Morton JF (2000) Food sources of added sweeteners in the diets of Americans. J Am Diet Assoc 100: 43–51, quiz 49–50.
  14. 14. West DS, Bursac Z, Quimby D, Prewitt TE, Spatz T, et al. (2006) Self-reported sugar-sweetened beverage intake among college students. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14: 1825–1831.
  15. 15. Stanhope KL, Griffen SC, Bair BR, Swarbrick MM, Keim NL, et al. (2008) Twenty-four-hour endocrine and metabolic profiles following consumption of high-fructose corn syrup-, sucrose-, fructose-, and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals. Am J Clin Nutr 87: 1194–1203.
  16. 16. World Health Organization (2003) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 54–71.
  17. 17. Johnson RK, Appel LJ, Brands M, Howard BV, Lefevre M, et al. (2009) Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 120: 1011–1020.
  18. 18. Wang YC, Bleich SN, Gortmaker SL (2008) Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among US children and adolescents, 1988–2004. Pediatrics 121: e1604–1614.
  19. 19. Stanhope KL, Havel PJ (2008) Fructose consumption: potential mechanisms for its effects to increase visceral adiposity and induce dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. Curr Opin Lipidol 19: 16–24.
  20. 20. Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, Griffen SC, Bremer AA, et al. (2009) Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest 119: 1322–1334.
  21. 21. Cox CL, Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Graham JL, Hatcher B, et al. (2012) Consumption of fructose- but not glucose-sweetened beverages for 10 weeks increases circulating concentrations of uric acid, retinol binding protein-4, and gamma-glutamyl transferase activity in overweight/obese humans. Nutr Metab (Lond) 9: 68.
  22. 22. Chu NF (2005) Prevalence of obesity in Taiwan. Obes Rev 6: 271–274.
  23. 23. Lin WT, Huang HL, Huang MC, Chan TF, Ciou SY, et al. (2013) Effects on uric acid, body mass index and blood pressure in adolescents of consuming beverages sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup. Int J Obes (Lond) 37: 532–539.
  24. 24. Chang HY, Pan WH, Yeh WT, Tsai KS (2001) Hyperuricemia and gout in Taiwan: results from the Nutritional and Health Survey in Taiwan (1993–96). J Rheumatol 28: 1640–1646.
  25. 25. Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health (1993) Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Republic of China. Taiwanese food and nutrients databank. Available:
  26. 26. Pan WH, Flegal KM, Chang HY, Yeh WT, Yeh CJ, et al. (2004) Body mass index and obesity-related metabolic disorders in Taiwanese and US whites and blacks: implications for definitions of overweight and obesity for Asians. Am J Clin Nutr 79: 31–39.
  27. 27. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CS, Richmond W, Fu PC (1974) Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem 20: 470–475.
  28. 28. Fossati P, Prencipe L, Berti G (1980) Use of 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid/4-aminophenazone chromogenic system in direct enzymic assay of uric acid in serum and urine. Clin Chem 26: 227–231.
  29. 29. Sachs L, Batra KL, Zimmermann B (2009) Medical implications of hyperuricemia. Med Health R I 92: 353–355.
  30. 30. Mickey RM, Greenland S (1989) The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 129: 125–137.
  31. 31. Lee CH, Yang SF, Peng CY, Li RN, Chen YC, et al. (2010) The precancerous effect of emitted cooking oil fumes on precursor lesions of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 127: 932–941.
  32. 32. Mayes PA (1993) Intermediary metabolism of fructose. Am J Clin Nutr 58: 754S–765S.
  33. 33. McGarry JD (1995) Malonyl-CoA and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I: an expanding partnership. Biochem Soc Trans 23: 481–485.
  34. 34. Bantle JP, Raatz SK, Thomas W, Georgopoulos A (2000) Effects of dietary fructose on plasma lipids in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 72: 1128–1134.
  35. 35. Choi HK, Willett W, Curhan G (2010) Fructose-rich beverages and risk of gout in women. JAMA 304: 2270–2278.
  36. 36. Emmerson BT (1974) Effect of oral fructose on urate production. Ann Rheum Dis 33: 276–280.
  37. 37. Lanaspa MA, Sanchez-Lozada LG, Cicerchi C, Li N, Roncal-Jimenez CA, et al. (2012) Uric acid stimulates fructokinase and accelerates fructose metabolism in the development of fatty liver. PLoS One 7: e47948.
  38. 38. Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, et al. (2007) Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 86: 899–906.
  39. 39. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres JP, Willett WC, et al. (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 33: 2477–2483.
  40. 40. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres JP, Hu FB (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation 121: 1356–1364.
  41. 41. Kloting N, Graham TE, Berndt J, Kralisch S, Kovacs P, et al. (2007) Serum retinol-binding protein is more highly expressed in visceral than in subcutaneous adipose tissue and is a marker of intra-abdominal fat mass. Cell Metab 6: 79–87.
  42. 42. Xia M, Liu Y, Guo H, Wang D, Wang Y, et al. (2013) Retinol binding protein 4 stimulates hepatic sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 and increases lipogenesis through the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1beta-dependent pathway. Hepatology 58: 564–575.
  43. 43. Chen CC, Wu JY, Chang CT, Tsai FJ, Wang TY, et al. (2009) Levels of retinol-binding protein 4 and uric acid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 58: 1812–1816.
  44. 44. Chang YH, Lin KD, Wang CL, Hsieh MC, Hsiao PJ, et al. (2008) Elevated serum retinol-binding protein 4 concentrations are associated with renal dysfunction and uric acid in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 24: 629–634.