Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Pathogenicity of a Microsporidium Isolate from the Diamondback Moth against Noctuid Moths:Characterization and Implications for Microbiological Pest Management

Pathogenicity of a Microsporidium Isolate from the Diamondback Moth against Noctuid Moths:Characterization and Implications for Microbiological Pest Management

  • Idris Abd Ghani, 
  • Hamady Dieng, 
  • Zainal Abidin Abu Hassan, 
  • Norazsida Ramli, 
  • Nadia Kermani, 
  • Tomomitsu Satho, 
  • Hamdan Ahmad, 
  • Fatimah Bt Abang, 
  • Yuki Fukumitsu, 
  • Abu Hassan Ahmad



Due to problems with chemical control, there is increasing interest in the use of microsporidia for control of lepidopteran pests. However, there have been few studies to evaluate the susceptibility of exotic species to microsporidia from indigenous Lepidoptera.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We investigated some biological characteristics of the microsporidian parasite isolated from wild Plutella xylostella (PX) and evaluated its pathogenicity on the laboratory responses of sympatric invasive and resident noctuid moths. There were significant differences in spore size and morphology between PX and Spodoptera litura (SL) isolates. Spores of PX isolate were ovocylindrical, while those of SL were oval. PX spores were 1.05 times longer than those of SL, which in turn were 1.49 times wider than those of the PX. The timing of infection peaks was much shorter in SL and resulted in earlier larval death. There were no noticeable differences in amplicon size (two DNA fragments were each about 1200 base pairs in length). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene sequences of the two isolates shared a clade with Nosema/Vairimorpha sequences. The absence of octospores in infected spodopteran tissues suggested that PX and SL spores are closely related to Nosema plutellae and N. bombycis, respectively. Both SL and S. exigua (SE) exhibited susceptibility to the PX isolate infection, but showed different infection patterns. Tissular infection was more diverse in the former and resulted in much greater spore production and larval mortality. Microsporidium-infected larvae pupated among both infected and control larvae, but adult emergence occurred only in the second group.


The PX isolate infection prevented completion of development of most leafworm and beet armyworm larvae. The ability of the microsporidian isolate to severely infect and kill larvae of both native and introduced spodopterans makes it a valuable candidate for biocontrol against lepidopteran pests.


The order Lepidoptera is comprised of more than 150000 species [1], some of which are among the world’s most serious agricultural and forest pests [2], [3], [4]. These pests inflict injuries on many types of plants, including crop plants and forest trees, causing huge amounts of loss to the vegetable and forest industries worldwide [5], [6] through their feeding on plant parts [7]. This is typical of the caterpillars of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella, PX), a major pest of Brassica crops [8]; the beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua, SE), a pest of more than 90 crop species in at least 18 families [3]; and Spodoptera litura (SL), a pest of many food crops [9] worldwide. The first, PX, is a threat to agricultural crops for several reasons–it has a high degree of genetic diversity and its host plants are widely grown around the world. In Asia, where most of its key natural enemies, such as larval parasitoids, are not abundant [10], PX is considered the most destructive pest of crucifers [11] and was first recorded in northern peninsular Malaysia in 1925 [12]. SE is a pest of cotton, tomatoes, celery, lettuce, cabbage, and alfalfa [13]. The larvae of this species feed on both foliage and fruit, causing serious damage [13], and adults have increased invasive properties as they are capable of migrating over large distances to find suitable habitats [14]. Heavy infestations may occur suddenly when the weather is favorable [15]. In Malaysia, this armyworm is a recently reported invasive pest [16], [17]. Its congeneric species, SL is native to South East Asia [18], where attacks cotton, groundnut, rice, tomato, tobacco, citrus, cocoa, potato, rubber, castor, millet, sorghum, maize, many other vegetables [19], weeds, and ornamental plants [20], as well as seedlings [21]. The early larval stages feed preferentially on “intermediate” leaves (i.e., those between immature and mature leaves), whereas the fourth instar larvae are capable of consuming most of the leaves [21].

Spodopterans cause substantial crop losses by feeding voraciously on leaves–etching on the bracts of fruiting forms [22], [13], which causes heavy loss of flower buds and newly formed fruits [23], scraping the leaf surface, which produces large irregular holes on leaves leaving only midrib veins, skeletonization, and defoliation [24]. Severe infestations often result in cosmetic injuries that can reduce marketability. Efforts to counteract such damage rely heavily on the use of chemical insecticides [25], [26]. However, SE [27], [28] and SL [29] have developed resistance to most classes of chemical insecticides worldwide [30], [31]. Frequent application of insecticides targeted at the beet armyworm did not prevent extensive damage and losses of crops, such as onions, eggplants, and crucifers [17]. Other strategies consist of using sex pheromones to trap adults or Bacillus thuringiensis products as pesticides [3], [32]. However, although the latter has at times been successful, such strategies are hampered by the development of resistance [13]. Another promising method involves the use of natural parasites and predators. Although larval parasitoid use has been successful in suppressing spodopteran pest populations in Europe, control attempts based on this approach have been severely impeded by the scarcity of such enemies in Asia.

In recent years, there has been a great deal of research regarding microsporidia related to their use in biocontrol of lepidopterans [33]. Almost all such studies have used symbionts of the target species. However, this may not be applicable to invasive species. Juliano and his colleague [34] reported that when a non-native species escapes the parasites that attack it in its native range, the likelihood of that species achieving high abundance and spreading can be enhanced. These authors also argued that the presence of parasites that are capable of attacking non-native species may help to keep the density of these species low. In Malaysia, SE has become a very important pest following its invasion as it feeds on almost all types of vegetable crop [17]. The braconid Microplitis manilae and the tachinid Peribaea orbata showed increased abilities to parasitize this increasingly abundant pest; however, their generalist nature limits their use as effective biological control agents.

Isolation Microsporidium species from many Lepidopterans has been documented [35], [36], [37]. Almost half of the described genera of microsporidia have an insect as the host [38]. Some microsporidia can produce infection on nontarget hosts. Solter and co-workers [37] found that microsporidia occurring in European populations of Lymantria dispar produce atypical and heavy infections in American lepidopteran species. Microsporidia isolated from lepidopteran hosts were infective toward Lymantria dispar. A Nosema species isolated from a noctuid moth host generated massive infections in L. dispar larvae [39]. SE was shown to be susceptible to a microsporidium isolated from different lepidopterans [39]. A microsporidium isolated from SL larvae was also reported to be pathogenic toward other non-natural lepidopteran hosts [40]. Most studies to identify candidate microsporidia for microbial control of spodopteran pests did not address the likely possibility that spodopteran non-symbiotic microsporidia may also be viable candidates. Therefore, any microsporidium that is not a symbiont but has high infectivity may also be a valuable candidate for control of spodopteran pests. The present study was performed to characterize both morphologically and at the molecular level a microsporidium isolated from wild diamondback moths and to evaluate its effects on invasive and native armyworms.

Materials and Methods

Statement on Ethic Issues

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Biological Research Ethics Committee at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Insects and Experimental Subjects

Three lepidopteran pests were included in the present study–two native species, the diamondback moth (PX) and the leafworm (SL) and one invasive species the beet armyworm (SE). PX and SL larvae were collected from cruciferous vegetable farms in the Cameron Highlands (CHs), Pahang, Malaysia, located at 04027′N and 101022′E. CHs lies 1400 m above sea level, with an average temperature of 22±2°C and relative humidity of 90±5% [41]. It is a mountainous area with approximately 75% of the area above 1000 meters from the sea level [42]. Over 5890 ha of CHs is in use for agricultural purposes [43] with vegetables cultivation representing 47% of the agricultural activities, following by tea (44%), flowers (7%) and fruit (1%) [44]. Two hundreds PX and SL larvae (respectively) were collected from the field. A similar number of third larval instars of SE and SL were provided by the Malaysian Agriculture Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Malaysia, for in vivo study. Field-collected and laboratory-reared larvae of the different lepidopterans were on potted cabbage plants (Brassica oleracea var-capitata, 5–8 fully expanded leaves) kept in screen cages (38 cm×26 cm×26 cm) under laboratory conditions [temperature 25°C±5.0°C, relative humidity 60–80% RH, and photoperiod of 12∶12 (L:D) hours] and honey feeding regime (provided of a 10% solution to adults) that were similar to those of Kermani et co-workers [45]. Laboratory larvae were routinely obtained from MARDI when necessary.

A total of 250 larvae of SL and 250 larvae of SE had been infected with m-px through their diet. 5 larvae for each treatment groups were sacrificed for every 24 hrs post-infection for spores counting. The remaining 5 larvae were observed for development and mortality. Larvae were sacrificed at the end of experiment for histopathology slides preparation.

Observations of Spore Morphology in PX and SL

The PX and SL larvae were macerated and ground in a mortar before adding distilled water. The resulting crude suspensions of spores (m-PX and m-SL) were filtered through muslin to remove larval tissues. The suspensions were then centrifuged at 1000×g at 10°C for 10 min. The pellets of m-PX and m-SL were resuspended in TE buffer and the spores were purified by mixing with Percoll 90% (1∶1) and subjected to gradient centrifugation at 3000×g for 30 min at 4°C, adopting a slightly modified previous method [46].

PCR Identification and Sequencing

Spore suspension (2×108 spores in 0.25 ml of TE buffer) was mixed with an equal volume of glass beads (0.4 mm) in glass tubes measuring 10×75 mm and shaken at maximum speed on a vortex mixer for 1 min. The homogenate was incubated with proteinase K (mixed with 300 µl of Tris-HCl (pH 9.5), 75 µl of 10% SDS, and 25 µl of 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol) for 1 h at 56°C to release the DNA from the nuclei, following slightly modified published procedures [47], [48]. The DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [49]. The small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene was amplified from each of the m-PX and m-SL isolates using the primer 18f 5′-CACCAGGTTGATTCTGCC-3′ and 1537r 5′-TATGATCCTGCTAATGGTTC-3′ designed by Baker and colleagues [50]. PCR amplification was carried out in a total volume of 25 µl using 100 ng of DNA, 20 pmol of each primer, 200 µM of each dNTP, 50 mM MgCl2 with PCR buffer and 2.5 U of Taq DNA Polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). Amplification was performed in a PTC-100TM Programmable Thermal Controller (MJ Research, Waltham, MA) for 40 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 57°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min. An aliquot of 5 µl from each reaction was run on a 1.2% agarose gel to visualize the PCR product. The PCR product of about 1.2 kb was purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and sent to First Base Laboratories Sdn. Bhd. (Shah Alam, Malaysia) for sequencing. The microsporidial SSUrRNA gene sequences of the isolates (m-PX and m-SL) and the other 22 SSUrRNA gene sequences (Table 1) were aligned using CLUSTAL X [51].

Table 1. The SSUrRNA sequences of microsporidia used for phylogenetic analysis.

Histopathological Examinations

Larvae, 1st–3rd instar from the experimental infections, which have been infected with 1×103 spore concentration, were used for histological examination. Larvae of SE and SL were dissected under sterile conditions and fixed in Carnoy’s fluid, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions (70%, 80%, 95%, and absolute alcohol), and cleared in ethanol:butanol (1∶1) for 2 h and absolute butanol for a further 2 h. There were then embedded in paraffin wax (58°C to 60°C) and different tissues cut into sections 0.7 µm thick. The cutting of sections, their staining and mounting procedures were carried out following a published work from our laboratory [45].

Experimental Infections

All experiments were conducted in an air-conditioned laboratory (25°C±5°C, with a photoperiod of 12 L: 12 D, and 60–80% relative humidity. Four doses of m-PX (1×102, 1×103, 1×104, and 1×105 spores/µl) were prepared according to a previous work [52]. Each dose was dispensed onto 1×1 cm2 Nosema-free mustard leaves and placed in 24-well plastic plates. The larvae were then allowed to feed on the spore-contaminated mustard leaves as a means of infection. Control larvae were fed mustard leaves minus the spores.

Data Collection and Statistical Analysis

The types of m-PX and m-SL spores were determined by observing fresh and Giemsa-stained slides under a light microscope at 400× and 1000× magnification (Olympus BX43 light microscope equipped with an Olympus DP72 10 megapixel camera). The size of spores was measured using a micrometer. The spore concentrations at the stipulated times were also estimated by scarifying a certain number of the infected larval instars. Final observations were carried out on the 15th day post-infection. The tissues (gut, Malpighian tubules, fat body, ganglion, and gonads) were inspected for the presence of spores and pathological effects. For both spodopteran species, larval and/or pupal deaths as well as adult emergence were recorded in both control and contaminated groups. The spore concentration was determined using a hemocytometer, following a published work [53]. The development and mortality rate of the larvae were monitored and recorded for 5 days beginning at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-infection (hpi). Phylogenetic analysis based on the resultant alignment was performed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm for distance analysis (Kimura two-parameter distances) with parsimony determined using Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP) 4.0b8 [54]. One thousand bootstrap replicates were generated to test the robustness of the tree. Sequence homology analyses were performed using BLAST database searches. The sequence from Nosema bombi (Accession No. AY741104) was used as an out-group. The differences in mean spore type sizes between PX and SL were examined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the MiniTab statistical software v. 16, with P < 0.05 taken to indicate statistical significance.


Spore Shape and Dimensions

The spores isolated from the diamondback and leaf armyworms differed in both shape and size: those of the PX isolate were ovocylindrical in shape, 3.167±0.21 µm in length, and 1.61±0.115 µm in width, while those of SL microsporidium were oval shaped, 3.00±0.10 µm in length, and 2.41±0.11 µm in width. There was a significant difference between the two lepidopteran species in mean spore size (F = 187.43, df = 34, P = 0.0001) (Table 2).

PCR Amplification and Sequence Analysis

Amplification of DNAs from m-PX and m-SL isolates with the 18f/1537r primer set yielded amplicons in both cases. The gene was located between nucleotides 2677 and 3908 relative to the 5′ end of the rRNA gene. Both amplicons (m-SL and m-PX) were about 1200 bp in length, suggesting that these isolated spores were microsporidia (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products.

Amplification with the primer set 18f/1537r. Lane 1∶1 kb DNA ladder (Invitrogen). Lane 2: SSUrRNA of m-PX; Lane 3: SSUrRNA of m-SL; and Lane 4: Negative control (without template).

Phylogenetic Analysis

The G+C content of the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene was 33.9%. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that all 24 microsporidia could be divided into two distinct clades: clade I consisting of microsporidia isolated from lepidopterans only, and clade II consisting of microsporidia isolated from amphipods, lepidopterans, and decapods. Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree also grouped the m-PX sequence with the other three microsporidia: Vairimorpha sp. (AF124331), Vairimorpha imperfecta (AJ131646), and Nosema plutellae (AY960987). All of these microsporidia were isolated from PX. All sequences of N. bombycis1–6, including m-SL, were grouped together under clade I (microsporidia isolated from lepidopterans only), although the strains were isolated from different locations throughout the world. These results suggested that m-SL spores are closely related to N. bombycis (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among microsporidia isolated from various hosts based on SSUrRNA.

The tree was generated by the neighbor-joining method using Kimura two-parameter distances.

Histopathological Analysis

Severe microsporidian infections were noticed in distinct larval tissues. The intestinal cells were severely infected, but the infection also extended to other tissues such as body fat, ganglia, and gonads of SE and SL. More severe infection was observed on SL tissue with perforation of the entire wall of the intestine and breakdown of the mucosal barrier (Figure 3). No spores were found in the muscles of either insect larvae. Also, no octospores were detected in infected tissues of spodopteran larvae.

Figure 3. m-PX (arrow) spores in the epithelial cells of the intestine of SE (A) and SL tissue with perforation of the entire wall of the intestine and breakdown of the mucosal barrier.

The arrow indicates an m-PX spore in an epithelial cell of the SL intestine (B).

PX Infection Dynamics in Spodopterans

When SE larvae were fed on PX spore-contaminated diet, infection occurred within 3 days post-feeding (72 hpi). Infection gradually increased thereafter for all four spore doses, reaching peaks on day 5 (120 hpi) post-meal uptake. The increase in infection was more pronounced at the two highest spore concentrations (1×105 and 1×105 spores/µl). However, in the control larvae maintained on the spore-free diet, infection level remained low even as time progressed (Figure 4A). When the beet armyworm larvae were provided access to the contaminated meal, infection occurred within the same time frame as observed previously, but peaks were attained at 96 hpi and 46 hpi post-and feeding for the first three and highest doses, respectively. Spore production subsequently dropped sharply. The control group showed a similar pattern of infection dynamics, but at far lower spore numbers (Figure 4B).

Figure 4. Amounts of P. xylostella spores found in S. exigua (A) and S. litura (B) larval samples collected at different time points following feeding on mustard leaves contaminated with different doses of the parasite spores.

Physiologically similar larvae of each species maintained on the same diet but without spores served as controls.

PX Infection and Spodopteran Mortality Responses

The first larval death occurred on day 4 post-infection in SE and two days earlier in S. litura. All SE-infected larvae died before and after 15 days post-infection, whereas those of SL succumbed between the 6th and 15th days post-infection. Pupation occurred in both spodopteran species, but in contrast to the control groups, no spodopteran-infected larvae reached the adult stage. It was clear from these observations that the isolate from PX can produce infection in these two spodopteran pests (Figures 5 A and B).

Figure 5. Mortality patterns of S. exigua (A) and S. litura (B) larval samples taken at different time points after feeding on mustard leaves contaminated with different doses of the parasite spores.

Physiologically similar larvae of each species maintained on the same diet but without spores served as controls.


The SSUrRNA genes of microsporidia are highly conserved, making them useless for distinguishing between very closely related species, even those that can be distinguished on morphological criteria, but they are still useful for genus-level identification [46], [48]. The SSUrRNA gene had a G+C content of 33.9%. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that all 24 microsporidia could be divided into two distinct clades: clade I consisting of microsporidia isolated from lepidopterans only, and clade II consisting of microsporidia isolated from amphipods, lepidopterans, and decapods. Both m-SL and m-PX sequences were grouped together in clade I that contains microsporidia belonging to the genera Nosema, Endoreticulatus, and Vairimorpha. Thus, this study confirmed that these two isolates were members of the N. bombycis complex and belonged to the same genus, i.e., Nosema, but were from different species [48]. The neighbor-joining (NJ) tree also grouped the m-PX sequence with the other three microsporidia: Vairimorpha sp. (AF124331), V. imperfecta (AJ131646), and N. plutellae (AY960987). All of these microsporidia were isolated from P. xylostellaVairimorpha sp., V. imperfecta, and N. plutellae were isolated from diamondback moths from Germany, Malaysia, and Taiwan, respectively. Similar results were reported previously by Solter and colleagues [55], who also suggested that the specificity of a parasite toward the host is limited by geographical distance. Different species of microsporidia should infect the same species of host in different localities. A study by Ku and co-workers [56] on microsporidia isolated from PX from Taipei and Taiwan suggested that the parasites were N. bombycis and N. plutellae, respectively. All sequences of N. bombycis1–6, including m-SL, were grouped together into clade I (microsporidia isolated from lepidopterans only) although the strains were isolated from different locations throughout the world. This suggests that m-SL spores are closely related to N. bombycis.

It is interesting to note that no spores have been detected in muscle tissue samples from both SE and SL. A similar observation was reported previously in Malaysia [57]. This author investigated the dissemination pattern of microsporidian infection in the body of wild armyworm larvae. Histopathological observations revealed severe infection of the fat body and gonads, mild infection of the Malpighian tubules, gut and neural epithelia and no muscular infection. They suggested this pattern of tissular infection to be that of Nosema sp. We have also found no octosporoblastic development forming eight uninucleate spores during the infection process by the PX microsporidium. This single life cycle is likely to provide further evidence that PX microsporidium belonged to the genus Nosema, and were closely related to Nosema plutellae [46].

The spodopteran pests were susceptible to a microsporidium isolate from wild diamondback moths. Spores were produced by both SL and SE, with greater levels of production in the second species. Larval mortality occurred in both the leaf and beet armyworms. No adult emergence took place among the microsporidium-infected spodopteran larvae, while most control larvae emerged as adults. Although there have been few studies to examine the susceptibility of lepidopteran pests to non-symbiotic microsporidia, Solter and his colleague [58] tested the pathogenicity of microsporidia from native insects, including moths, on a non-natural on non-natural lepidopteran hosts. They found no transmission in their study. Rather than evaluating only host specificity in non-natural microsporidium-moth systems, we examined the susceptibility of a well-established invasive moth to a microsporidium isolate from a sympatric lepidopteran. A distinct pattern of infection of m-PX in these two pest species was observed.

Until day 5, i.e., 120 hpi, all infected groups of SE larvae showed an upward trend or increasing degree of infection, especially after 96 hpi with the presence of many spores in tissues. Spore concentration reached the maximum after 120 hpi. The highest dose of infection (1×105 spores/µl) resulted in the highest spore concentration, and caused one death after 96 hpi. All infected instars in all groups succumbed to this infection after two weeks post-infection, with the majority reaching the pupal stage only. On the other hand, control larvae showed natural infection with the parasite but it was to a low degree, and they survived the infection, successfully undergoing metamorphosis to the adult stage. These results indicated that SE was susceptible to m-PX infection and that a low degree of infection in nature was a common phenomenon that normally did not cause death of the insect pests [59]. It is possible that death of the infected instars was due to the large number of spores, which caused severe tissue damage [60]. In infected larvae of SL, the patterns of m-PX infection were different. Spore concentrations in all groups of infected larvae increased markedly until 72 or 96 hpi, after which they declined sharply to a minimal level of less than 2×103 spores/µl. Control larvae also showed the same pattern of infection, but with lower spore burdens. Interestingly, during this episode of infection, mortality did occur in the infected larvae as early as 48 hpi. Although larvae succumbed after 120 hpi and before the 15th day post-infection, most of the infected larvae died at the pupal stage, while control larvae successfully reached the adult stage. These results suggested that both pest species are naturally susceptible to m-PX but with different patterns of infection.

During the course of infection, SL larvae mounted vigorous immune responses that were likely capable of clearing infection in some parts of their body, as suggested by the decrease in number of spores. Despite the ability to mount an immune response against the parasite, most infected larvae died. The strategy used by microsporidia to invade the host is dependent on the ability of their polar tube to rapidly extrude to allow injection of the infectious spore contents into the target cell [61], [62]. Many factors come into play when considering interactions between parasite and host cell components. In particular, bacteria and their metabolites have marked influences on microsporidian infection, as indicated by a recent study in which Porrini and co-workers [63] investigated the antiparasitic activity of bacterial metabolites from Bacillus and Enterococcus strains on Nosema ceranae-infected bees. Their results indicated that spores exposed to direct contact with a particular surfactin showed significantly reduced infectivity. Although we did not determine whether the experimental hosts were infected with bacteria, is it important to note that the PX isolate was highly infectious for both SL and SE larvae, with infection peaks occurring between 36 and 120 hpi and first mortalities on day 2 or 4 post-infection. The premise of biological agent use against the larval stage is to reduce the target insect pest population densities by preventing a number of larvae from completing development. Krieg and his colleague [64] defined a good microbiological agent as one that is highly infectious. Further, Mewis and co-workers [33] examined the pathogenicity and transmission of a microsporidium against the lepidopteran pest Hellula undalis. They found that infection by feeding artificial diet containing spores to 3rd instar larvae resulted in 100% infection with a final mortality rate of 80%. They also noticed that most larvae died before reaching the pupal stage and 40% died 3 days after spore uptake. These observations prompted them to consider the microsporidium, Vairimorpha sp., as a potential microbiological agent. Based on the prerequisite of high infectivity for a good microsporidium agent discussed by others [64] and the results of the above-mentioned study, the described Nosema sp. of PX has potential for use as a microbial insect pest control agent.

The diamondback moth has been considered as the most destructive pest of crucifers in Asia [65], including Malaysia. In this country, this pest attacks cruciferous vegetables, which are also infested by SE [66] and SL [67]. Ranked as a key pest in neighbouring Thailand, the armyworm has been reported to infest legumes and brassicas in Malaysia [66]. Besides chewing leaves, SL also infest tubers and roots of crops [68], and can block pod maturation of groundnuts [69]. Efforts to control the diamondback moth have been aimed through a variety of methods, but mainly by pesticides [70], [71]. Although increased frequency of insecticide sprays have been sometimes successful, the hopefulness that this pest can be effectively controlled by this strategy was not realized because it has developed widespread resistance to almost all insecticide classes [72]. In Malaysia, the intensive use of insecticides has resulted in the reduction of PX population size in some areas, but concomitant to this decrease, there has been an increased prevalence of spodoptera pests, in particular SL [66]. A similar observation has been reported earlier in Southeast Asia [73], [74]. Originating from outside, the armyworm has become well-established in most of the Malaysia’s vegetable production sites [16], [17], where it has acquired important crucifer pest status during the 1990s [66]. As both PX and SL infest cruciferous vegetables, it is likely the competitive interactions occur between their populations. In addressing the ecology of invasive insect pests, Juliano and his colleague [34] claimed that invasive species may spread into new areas by occupying previously unoccupied habitat and that invasion result in declines or elimination of ecologically similar native species. They also argued that non-native species may not expand over a limited area because they are not effective competitors, with competition from residents apparently contracting their dissemination. In approaching this issue, Lim and co-workers [66] pleaded that invasive pests can only be capably controlled if there also exist their complement of effective natural enemies. Our results clearly demonstrated that the PX isolate is highly infectious and insecticidal to the studied spodopteran species. The microsporidian infections and the noctuids’s mortality patterns obtained strongly support the suggestion that the parasite can be useful in managing these pests. At time when there is still no definitive and efficient chemical insecticide strategy to control them, exploring the microsporidium isolate from the diamondback moth may aid in sustainable vegetable production and to combat biodiversity loss in Malaysia and other countries with similar issues.

This study was carried-out to assess the effects of a Nosema species isolated from wild diamondback moths on developing larvae of two spodopteran pests with respect to the potential use as a control agent. In addition to providing insight into the transmission and pathogenicity of microsporidia into non-natural lepidopteran hosts, this study suggested that Nosema sp. of PX may be useful to reduce spodopteran species populations. Our results clearly indicated the efficacy of the parasite to infect and kill the larvae of SL and SE. Tissular infection was various diverse and resulted in appreciable spore productions and larval mortalities. These observations suggested that the PX isolate may be useful in managing these noctuid pests. Despite encouraging results there are still many unknowns such as the effects of the PX isolate on humans–many microsporidia emerged as important opportunistic pathogens in humans [75] and nontarget species of insects. In addressing the issue of the host specificity of insect pathogens, Solter and his colleague [76] claimed that generalist pathogens, introduced for biological control of a pest species, could theoretically become epidemic in nontarget species. They also argued that argued for the need to the potential host range and possible effects on other species of insects, before a pathogen is released for biological control purposes. This information is also important in obtaining regulatory approval for the tested microsporidium as a biological control agent and in understanding its evolutionary adaptability to new hosts [37]. Therefore, further research is required to evaluate the possible use of this microsporidium in a control program against spodopteran pests. In particular, studies to confirm its efficacy in both the laboratory and under field conditions, and to determine the influence of environmental factors on its pathogenicity as well as its host range, are mandatory.


We thank the personnel of the Malaysian Agriculture Research and Development Institute (MARDI), for supplying larvae to us.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: IAG HD ZAA NR HA Performed the experiments: IAG ZAA NK Analyzed the data: IAG HD TS YF AHA Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: IAG Wrote the manuscript: IAG HD FBA


  1. 1. Cannings RA, Scudder GGE (2007) Butterflies, moths and skippers (Lepidoptera) of British Columbia. Available: Accessed 25 July 2013.
  2. 2. Schneider MF (1999) Entomology - A textbook for students, agriculturalists and foresters in Papua New Guinea. Bulolo University College, Papua New Guinea.
  3. 3. Liburd OE, Funderburk JE, Olson SM (2000) Effect of biological and chemical insecticides on Spodoptera species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and marketable yields of tomatoes. J Appl Entomol 124: 19–25.
  4. 4. Jiang H, Vilcinskas A, Kanost MR (2010) Immunity in lepidopteran insects. Adv Exp Med Biol 708: 181–204.
  5. 5. Sigsgaard L, Greenstone MH, Duffield SJ (2002) Egg cannibalism in Helicoverpa armigera on sorghum and pigeonpea. Biol Contr 47: 151–165.
  6. 6. Abbasi PA, Conn KL, Lazarovits G (2007) Managing soilborne diseases of vegetable crops with a pre-plant soil or substrate amendment of a corn distillation product. Biocontr Sce Technol 17: 331–344.
  7. 7. Navarajan PAV (2007) Insect pests and their management. Available: Accessed 27 July 2013.
  8. 8. Grzywacz D, Rossbach A, Rauf A, Russell DA, Srinivasan R, et al. (2010) Current control methods for diamondback moth and other brassica insect pests and the prospects for improved management with lepidopteran-resistant Bt vegetable brassicas in Asia and Africa. Crop Prot 29: 68–79.
  9. 9. Sajap AS, Kotulai JR, Bakir MA, Hong LW, Samad MA, et al. (2000) Pathogenicity and characteristics of Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus from Peninsular Malaysia. Pertanika J Trop Agri Sce 23: 23–28.
  10. 10. Bordat D, Kirk AA (2002) Improving biocontrol of Plutella xylostella. Proceedings of the International Symposium in Montpellier, France.
  11. 11. Talekar NS, Shelton AM (1993) Biology, ecology and management of the diamondback moth. Ann Rev Entomol 38: 275–301.
  12. 12. Corbett GH, Pagden HT (1941) A review of some recent entomological investigations and observations. Malaysian Agri J 29: 347–375.
  13. 13. Dingha BN (2005) Effects of toxicants, temperature, and resistance on metabolism and gas exchange patterns of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner), and the German cockroach, Blattella Germanica (Linnaeus). Thesis dissertation, Science, Auburn University, USA.
  14. 14. Mikkola K (1970) The interpretation of long-range migrations of Spodoptera exigua. J Anim Ecol 39: 593–598.
  15. 15. French RA (1969) Migration of Laphygma exigua (Hubner) to the British Isles in relation to large scale weather systems. J Anim Ecol 38: 199–210.
  16. 16. Palasubramaniam K, Thiagarajan R, Asna BO (2000) Status of the beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) in Peninsular Malaysia. In: Zakaria S, editor. Proceedings of the plant health seminar. Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Malaysia.
  17. 17. Sivapragasam A (2007) Experiences in managing invasive alien insect species in agro-ecosystems. In: Appanah S, Sim HC, Sankaran KV, editors. Developing an Asia-pacific strategy for forest invasive species: the coconut beetle problem – bridging agriculture and forestry. Report of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Network Workshop 22–25 February 2005, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
  18. 18. Waterhouse D, Norris K (1987) (Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). In: Biological Control: Pacific Prospects. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia. 250–259.
  19. 19. Hill DS (1993) Agricultural insect pests of the tropics and their control. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, London, UK.
  20. 20. Ramana VV, Reddy GPV, Krishnamurthy MM (1988) Synthetic pyrethroids and other bait formulation in the control of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) attacking rabi groundnut. Pesticides 1: 522–524.
  21. 21. Roychoudhury PK, Srivastava A, Sahai V (1995) Extractive bioconversion of lactic acid. In: Fiechter A, Editor, Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Springer-Verlag 53: 61–87.
  22. 22. Smith RH (1989) Experiences with beet armyworm control in 1988. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., National Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
  23. 23. Oanh NTK, Luyen CH, Kurma P (2004) Constraints in vegetable production by pests and diseases in Donganh district, Hanoi. A Project document. Available: Accessed 1 August 2013.
  24. 24. Vasquez E, Amante V (2012) Sweetpotato spider mite. Sweetpotato DiagNotes: a diagnostic key and information tool for sweetpotato problems. Centre for Biological Information Technology, University of Queensland. Available: Accessed 5 August 2013.
  25. 25. Aldosari SA, Watson TF, Sivasupramaniam S, Osman AA (1996) Susceptibility of field populations of beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to cyfluthrin, methomyl, and profenofos, and selection for resistance to cyfluthrin. J Econ Entomol 89: 1359–1363.
  26. 26. Wolfenbarger DA (2002) Inheritance of resistance by a strain of beet armyworm to fenvalerate, methomyl, methyl parathion, and permethrin. Resistant Pest Manag Newslet 12: 25–27.
  27. 27. Moulton JK, Pepper DA, Jansson RK, Dennehy TJ (2002) Pro-active management of beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance to tebufenozide and methoxyfenozide: Baseline monitoring, risk assessment, and isolation of resistance. J Econ Entomol 95: 414–424.
  28. 28. Hernández-Martínez P, Navarro-Cerrillo G, Caccia S, de Maagd RA, Moar WJ, et al. (2010) Constitutive activation of the midgut response to Bacillus thuringiensis in Bt-resistant Spodoptera exigua. PLoS One 5: e12795.
  29. 29. Sudhakaran R (2002) Efficacy of lufenuron (Match 5% EC) against Spodoptera litura (F.) under in vitro condition. Insect Envir 8: 7–48.
  30. 30. Cobb PP, Bass MH (1975) Beet armyworm: dosage mortality studies on California and Florida strains. J Econ Entomol 68: 813–814.
  31. 31. Brewer MJ, Trumble JT, Alvarado-Rodriques B, Chaney WE (1990) Beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) adult and larval susceptibility to three insecticides in managed habitats and relationship to laboratory selection for resistance. J Econ Entomol 83: 2136–2146.
  32. 32. Zheng XL, Wang P, Cheng WJ, Wang XP, Lei CL (2012) Projecting overwintering regions of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua in China using the CLIMEX model. J Insect Sce 12: 1–13.
  33. 33. Mewis I, Kleespies RG, Ulrichs C, Schnitzler WH (2003) First detection of a microsporidium in the crucifer pest Hellula undalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)–a possible control agent? Biol Contr 26: 202–208.
  34. 34. Juliano SA, Lounibos LP (2005) Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health. Ecol Let 8: 558–574.
  35. 35. Wittner M, Weiss LM (1999) The Microsporidia and Microsporidiosis, eds. American Society for Microbiology Press. 553 p.
  36. 36. Didier ES, Didier PJ, Snowden KF, Shadduck JA (2000) Microsporidiosis in mammals. Microbes Infect 2: 709–720.
  37. 37. Solter LF, Maddox JV, Mcmanus ML (1997) Host specificity of microsporidia Protista Microspora from European populations of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) to indigenous North American Lepidoptera. J Invertebr Pathol 69: 135–150.
  38. 38. Becnel JJ, Andreadis TG (1999) Microsporidia in insects. In: Wittner M, Weiss LM, Editors, The Microsporidia and Microsporidiosis, ASM Press Washington DC. 447–501.
  39. 39. Solter LF, Pilarska DK, Vossbrinck CF (2000) Host specificity of microsporidia pathogenic to forest Lepidoptera. Biol Contr 19: 48–56.
  40. 40. Johny S, Kanginakudru S, Muralirangan MC, Nagaraju J (2006) Morphological and molecular characterization of a new microsporidian (Protozoa: Microsporidia) isolated from Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Parasitol 132: 803–814.
  41. 41. Mohd Rasdi Z, Che Salmah MR, Abu Hassan A, Hamady D, Hamaseh A, et al. (2012) Field evaluation of some insecticides on whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) and predator (Macrolophus caliginosus) on brinjal and tomato plants. Asian J Agri Rural Dev 2: 302–311.
  42. 42. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Malaysia (2001a) Study for the Sustainable Development of the Highlands of Peninsular Malaysia, Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department.
  43. 43. Hashim GM, Wan Yusoff WA (2003) Environmental issues in highlands agriculture, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI).
  44. 44. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Malaysia (2001b) Study on the development of hill stations”, Economic planning unit, Prime Minister’s Department.
  45. 45. Kermani N, Abu-Hassan ZA, Dieng H, Ismail NF, Attia M, et al. (2013) Pathogenicity of Nosema sp. (Microsporidia) in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). PLoS One 8(5): e62884
  46. 46. Canning EU, Curry A, Cheney S, Lafranchi-Tristem NJ, Hague MA (1999) Vairimorpha imperfecta n.sp., a microsporidian exhibiting an abortive octosporous sporogony in Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Parasitol 119: 273–286.
  47. 47. Undeen AH, Cockburn AF (1989) The extraction of DNA from microsporidia spores. J Invertebr Pathol 54: 132–133.
  48. 48. Tsai SJ, Lo CF, Soichi Y, Wang CH (2003) The characterization of microsporidian isolates (Nosematidae: Nosema) from five important lepidopteran pests in Taiwan. J Invertebr Pathol 83: 51–59.
  49. 49. Huang WF, Tsai SJ, Lo CF, Soichi Y, Wang CH (2004) The novel organization and complete sequence of the ribosomal RNA gene of Nosema bombycis. Fungal Gen Biol 41: 473–481.
  50. 50. Baker MD, Vossbrinck CR, Didier ES, Maddox JV, Shadduck JA (1995) Small subunit ribosomal DNA phylogeny of various microsporidia with emphasis on AIDS related forms. J Eukaryotic Microbiol 42: 564–570.
  51. 51. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4876–4882.
  52. 52. Cantwell GE (1970) Standard methods for counting Nosema spores. Amer Bee J 110: 222–223.
  53. 53. Undeen AH (1997) Mikrosporidia (Protozoa): a handbook of biology and research techniques. Available: Accessed 16 July 2013.
  54. 54. Swofford DL (1998) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
  55. 55. Solter LF, Pilarska DK, Vossbrinck CF (2000) Host specificity of microsporidia pathogenic to forest Lepidoptera. Biol Contr 19: 48–56.
  56. 56. Ku CT, Wang CY, Tsai YC, Tzeng CC, Wang CH (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of two putative Nosema isolates from cruciferous Lepidopteran pests in Taiwan. J Invertebr Pathol 95: 71–76.
  57. 57. Sajap AS (1995) A preliminary observation on microsporidian infection in the armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Fabricus) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Malaysian Appl Biol 24: 43–48.
  58. 58. Solter LF, Maddox JV (1998) Physiological host specificity of microsporidia as an indicator of ecological host specificity. J Invertebr Pathol 71: 207–216.
  59. 59. Chapman RF, Joern A (1990) Biology of Grasshoppers. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
  60. 60. Dunn AM, Smith JE (2001) Microsporidian life cycles and diversity; the relationship between virulence and transmission. Microbes Infect 3: 381–388.
  61. 61. Keohane EM, Weiss LM (1999) The structure, function, and composition of the microsporidian polar tube. In: Wittner M, Weiss LM, Editors, The Microsporidia and Microsporidiosis, ASM Press, Washington DC, USA. 196–224
  62. 62. Texier C, Vidau C, Viguès B, El Alaoui H, Delbac F (2010) Microsporidia: a model for minimal parasite-host interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol 13: 443–449.
  63. 63. Porrini MP, Audisio MC, Sabaté DC, Ibarguren C, Medici SK, et al. (2010) Effect of bacterial metabolites on microsporidian Nosema ceranae and on its host Apis mellifera. Parasitol Res 107: 381–388.
  64. 64. Krieg A, Franz JM (1989) Lehrbuch der biologischen Schädlingsbekämpfung. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin und Hamburg, Germany.
  65. 65. Talekar NS (2004) Biological control of diamondback moth in Asia. In: Kirk A, Bordat D, Editors, Improving biocontrol of Plutella xylostella, CIRAD Montpellier, France.
  66. 66. Lim GS, Sivaragasam A, Loke WH (1997) Crucifer insect pest problems: trends, issues and management strategies. In: Sivapragasam A, Loke WH, Kadir AH, Lim GS, editors. The management of diamondback moth and other crucifer pests. MARDI, Malaysia, 3–16. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop, 29 October–1 November 1996, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  67. 67. Muniappan R, Marutani M (1992) Pest management for head cabbage production on Guam. Diamondback moth and other crucifer pests Proceedings of the Second International Workshop, 10–14 December 1990, Tainan, Taiwan. AVRDC Publication No. 92–368. N. S Talekar, ed. Taipei, Taiwan, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. 419–426.
  68. 68. Chatterje PB, Nayak DK (1987) Occurrence of Spodoptera litura (Fabr.) as a new pest of sugar-beet in West Bengal. Pesticides 21: 21–22.
  69. 69. Singh KN, Sachan GC (1992) Assessment of yield loss due to insect pests at different growth stages of groundnut in Pantnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India. Crop Prot 11: 414–418.
  70. 70. Lohr B, Gathu R (2002) Towards biocontrol-based IPM for diamondback moth in eastern and southern Africa. Integrated pest management conference for sub-Saharan Africa. 8–12 September 2002, Kampala, Uganda.
  71. 71. Beyene B (2007) Manure on the infestation and damage of Kale (Brassica oleracea L. var acephala) by diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutelliddae) in a bio-farming systems. Thesis dissertation, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  72. 72. Sarfraz M, Keddie BA (2005) Conserving the efficacy of insecticides against Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep., Plutellidae). J Appl Entomol 129: 149–157.
  73. 73. Stechmann DH, Semisi ST (1984) Insektenbekämpfung in West-Samoa unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Standes biologischer und integrierter Verfahren. Anz. Schädlingskunde, PX anzenschutz, Umweltschutz 57: 65–70.
  74. 74. Rangga Rao GV, Shanower TG (1988) A Survey a groundnut insect pest in Andhara Pradesh post rainy season 1987–1988. Intl Arachis Newslet 4: 8–10.
  75. 75. Mathis A, Weber R, Deplazes P (2005) Zoonotic potential of the microsporidia. J Clin Microbiol Rev 18: 423–445.
  76. 76. Solter LF, Maddox JO (1995) Host specificity of insect pathogens: evaluation for biological control programs. Biological Control News. Vol. II No. 9. Available: Accessed 27 July 2013.