Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Talaromyces columbinus sp. nov., and Genealogical Concordance Analysis in Talaromyces Clade 2a

Abstract

During the course of mold surveys, a set of Talaromyces isolates were obtained that did not fit any described species. Phenotypic examination of these isolates showed that they were similar to T. piceus but differed in some growth characteristics. Multilocus DNA sequence data were obtained for the new isolates and some related species in the broader, more inclusive clade, and the data were analyzed using genealogical concordance. The new isolates are described as Talaromyces columbinus. From analysis of the related species, Penicillium rugulosum var. atricolum is given species status in Talaromyces as T. atricola. Penicillium tardum and P. chrysitis were showed to be synonyms of T. rugulosus. Penicillium scorteum and T. phialosporus were showed to be conspecific and under the rule of priority T. scorteus is the proper name for isolates previously known as T. phialosporus. Talaromyces wortmanii was showed to be distinct from Penicillium concavorugulosum and T. variabilis but the relationship of the latter two species remains unresolved. Examination of ITS sequences from GenBank showed that T. columbinus has previously been reported from human lung infections under the name Penicillium piceum.

Introduction

The genus Penicillium is widely known and studied because of its impact on human activities [1]. Historically, the broad sense of Penicillium has contained two very different groups, the first group containing monoverticillate, furcate and terverticillate species with broad ampuliform conidiogenous cells, and the second group containing biverticillate species with acerose conidiogenous cells. Where known, the two groups produced two different types of teleomorphs, either closed structures characterized by walls containing pseudoparenchymatous cells (Eupenicillium) or ascocarps having loosely woven hyphae forming the wall (Talaromyces). Several investigators e.g., [2] demonstrated the phylogenetic distinction between these two groups of Penicillium. Under the Melbourne nomenclatural code [3] dual naming was revoked in favor of using a single name for a single species. Samson et al. [4] formally recognized the phylogenetic distinction of the species with acerose conidiogenous cells and/or loosely woven ascocarp walls by placing them in the genus Talaromyces. Talaromyces is based on phylogenetic relationships, not whether the teleomorphic stage is known. Among the species placed in Talaromyces was Penicillium piceum under the new combination Talaromyces piceus.

Pitt [1] regarded Penicillium piceum as a relatively uncommon but widely distributed species. The species has been reported as causal organism in certain human lung infections [5], [6] and has been examined as a potential source of extracellular catalase [7] and isochaetochromin [8]. P. piceum has also been investigated as an indicator species for use in forensic science [9]. New Talaromyces species are being discovered as the molecular tools for phylogenetics are more widely applied to this genus [10][12].

During the course of fungal surveys conducted by one of us (ZJ) certain isolates resembling T. piceus were found that did not perfectly fit the description [1] and were retained for further investigation. Subsequent detailed examination showed that these isolates were representative of a previously unknown species that we describe here as Talaromyces columbinus. Talaromyces piceus fits into a small clade within Talaromyces designated clade 2a by Samson et al. [4]. In assessing the positions of the species within this clade, a number of phenotype-based taxonomic hypotheses [1], [13][15] were also tested using genealogical concordance analysis [16].

Materials and Methods

Isolations

Isolation of strains from air was performed by using a single stage bio-aerosol impaction sampler (EMSL VP-400 Microbial Sampler) for the viable sampling of fungi. The sampler contains over 400 precision drilled holes and a base section for placement of the agar media. Air was passed through each sampler with a flow rate of 28.3 L/minute for 3 minutes. The media used for fungal isolations was malt extract agar.

Culture Methods

Isolates (Table 1) were grown on Czapek yeast extract agar (CYA), CYA with 20% sucrose (CY20S), malt extract agar (MEA), oatmeal agar (OA), dichloran-glycerol agar (DG18), Czapek yeast autolysate agar with 5% NaCl (CYA–5% NaCl), and creatine agar (CREA) [1], [17]. Cultures were incubated in darkness at 25°C for 7 d. Additional CYA cultures were incubated at different temperatures to determine the cardinal growth temperatures of the new species (10, 14.5, 20, 25, 30, 35, 37, 41, 42.5, 44.5, 46, 48 and 50°C) for 7 d. The cultures were grown on one plate as a three-point inoculation on each medium in 9 cm diam Petri dishes. Colony diameters and appearances were recorded and photographs were made from 7 d culture plates. Analysis of the growth data was performed using Sygraph in SYSTAT 11 for Windows [18]. The Ridgway [19] color guide was used to specify certain colors and those are referred to by plate number, e.g. (R47). Weighted regression analysis was used to model and compare the growth of 2 fungal species, Talaromyces piceus and T. columbinus, using the mean of 6 replications of colony diameter measurements (mm) as a function of temperature (°C). Standard weighting of 1/variance was used for each mean colony diameter at each temperature tested. A full and reduced model F-test was used to determine if the equations for each species were significantly different from one another. If a significant F-test value was obtained (indicating T. piceus was different from T. columbinus colony growth), regression coefficients were compared between the 2 species as well as colony diameters at each temperature using 95% confidence interval overlap.

thumbnail
Table 1. Provenance, GenBank accession numbers for DNA sequences and MycoBank numbers for species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078084.t001

Microscopy

Microscopic examination was performed by gently pressing a ca 20×5 mm piece of transparent tape onto a colony, rinsing the tape with one or two drops of 70% ethanol and mounting the tape in lactic acid with fuchsin dye. Additional microscopic samples were made by teasing apart a small amount of mycelium in a drop of water containing 0.5% Tween 20. A Leica DM 2500 microscope with bright field, phase contrast and DIC optics was used to view the slides. A Spot camera with Spot imaging software was mounted on the microscope and used for photomicrography. A Nikon digital SLR camera with a D70 lens was used for colony photography. Photographs were re-sized and fitted into plates using Microsoft PowerPoint 2010.

Phylogenetic Analysis

Strains used in phylogenetic analysis (Table 1) were grown in 25 mL of 2% malt extract broth in 125-mL Erlenmeyer flasks shaken at 200 rpm (25–28°C). Mycelium was harvested after 1–2 days growth by vacuum filtration over Whatman #1 filter paper and then placed loosely in microfuge tubes, frozen and freeze dried. The freeze-dried biomass was ground to a fine powder and rehydrated with 0.5 mL CTAB buffer [20]. Proteins were extracted by the addition of 0.5 mL chloroform. After brief emulsification, the aqueous phase was separated from the organic phase by centrifugation. The aqueous phase was transferred to a clean tube and DNA was precipitated by the addition of 0.5 mL isopropanol. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation and rinsed with 70% ethanol. The pellet was rehydrated with 0.1 mL TE buffer and stored at −20°C until used.

Beta tubulin (BT2), calmodulin (CF), nuclear internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), DNA replication licensing protein (Mcm7), RNA polymerase II (RPB2) and ribosome biogenesis protein (Tsr1) were amplified from 1∶10 diluted genomic DNA using previously described primers and conditions [21]. RNA polymerase II largest subunit (RPB1) sequences were obtained for select isolates using published methods [4]. Initial results indicated that the BT2 primers (BT2a, BT2b) were amplifying paralogous genes. The primers (BT2f and T22) and procedures of Hubka and Kolarik [22], developed to resolve this problem in Aspergillus japonicus, were used to conduct repeated amplification and sequencing of the suspect products. This procedure also produced the paralogous gene products.

Amplified DNA was prepared for sequencing reactions with ExoSapit [23]. Sequencing reactions were performed using DyeDeoxy terminator kits (v 3) following the manufacturer’s instructions and subsequent analysis on an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer [24]. Sequencing was performed in both directions and any conflicts were resolved using Sequencher 5 [25] to visualize the sequences. Sequences were carefully reviewed for quality and experiments were repeated if there was doubt about the reliability of sequence reads. Sequences were subjected to Blast search against the GenBank nr database.

Three DNA sequence datasets were aligned using Clustalw [26]. One was composed of a wide array of species in the genus Talaromyces clade 2A [4] including only RPB2 data, whose purpose was to show the overall position of the new species in the clade. The other alignments were sequences from T. piceus and T. columbinus isolates for each of the sequenced genes and alignments of T. rugulosus and T. phialosporus and putative synonyms. Aligned datasets were analyzed using maximum parsimony [27] and 1000 bootstraps. Conditions for parsimony analysis were random sequence addition, maxtrees = 5000 and swap = tbr (tree bisection and reconnection). For bootstrap calculations addseq = asis, maxtrees = 100 and swap = tbr were set. Talaromyces proteolyticus was used as the out-group species for the analysis based on the study by Samson et al. [4]. Tree files were visualized and converted to emf format using TreeView [28] and redrawn for publication using CorelDraw X6 [29]. Genealogical concordance [16] was assessed through visual comparison of the individual locus trees.

Results

DNA Sequences

DNA sequences determined in this study are deposited in GenBank and accession numbers are found in Table 1.

Blast searches of GenBank using ITS sequences revealed that T. piceus ex type isolates held by NRRL (Agricultural Research Service culture collection Peoria, IL), CBS (Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands) and ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) that originated from the same parental culture were different. CBS 361.48 (GenBank JN899370 ) differs from NRRL 1051 (GenBank KF196893) by six gap positions, all deletions of T residues relative to NRRL 1051; ATCC 10519 (GenBank DQ666826) differs from NRRL 1051 by insertion of two A residues and one T residue relative to NRRL 1051. Five isolates of T. piceus examined in this study (Table 1) shared an identical and unique ITS sequence. The RPB2 sequence of CBS 391.48 (JF417433) should be identical to NRRL 1048 (KF196975) because the cultures originated from the same parental culture. Of 975 comparable bases, there is an A/G difference near the 3′ end of the read. The RPB1 sequence for P. tardum NRRL 1073 generated here (KF196957) differs at 94 out of 455 nucleotide positions from the sequence of CBS 258.37 (JN899293). These isolates are putatively descended from the same parent culture.

Blast searches of our new species against the GenBank nr (non-redundant sequence) database provided a 100% similarity of our new species to the ITS sequence from IMI 392509 (DQ666824) (IMI, International Mycological Institute, Egham, UK), a fungus isolated from a human lung infection in Buenos Aires, Argentina [6]. Other gene sequences from our new species (BT2, CF, Mcm7, RPB2, Tsr1 and RPB1) produced no high homology to any sequences in the nr database.

Seven of eight T. columbinus isolates shared an identical ITS sequence (e.g. KF196896) and one isolate had a single transition (KF196900) versus the others. T. piceus isolates shared the same ITS sequence (e.g., KF196893). The common species sequences differed by seven transition base differences, one transversion and one indel. In our analysis, barcode identification [30] of these species is practical.

The RPB2 based phylogeny of Talaromyces clade 2a is shown in Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships and topology of single locus trees of the isolates are shown in Fig. 2. The product of BT2 primer amplifications placed isolates of T. piceus and T. columbinus in four statistically supported distinct clades. That tree is notably discordant from the CF, Mcm7 and RPB2 loci (Fig. 2) that place the same isolates in two strongly supported clades. The majority rule of congruence analysis indicates these are distinct species [16].

thumbnail
Figure 1. Phylogeny of Talaromyces clade 2a.

Phylogenetic tree of species from part of Talaromyces based on maximum parsimony analysis of RPB2 gene sequences. Bootstrap values above 90% are shown as thick lines in the tree. T. columbinus and T. piceus form strongly supported branches; T. rugulosus, P. chrysitis and P. tardum form a strongly supported branch with T. atricola as sibling; T. scorteus and T. phialosporus form a strongly supported branch. Species on a strongly supported branch that are not well distinguished are potentially synonymous. The tree is rooted with T. proteolyticus on the basis of prior more comprehensive analysis of the genus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078084.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. Genealogical analysis of T. piceus and T. columbinus.

Excised portions of phylogenetic trees based on beta tubulin (BT2), calmodulin (CF), minichromosome maintenance factor 7 (Mcm7) and RNA polymerase beta (RPB2). Bootstrap values above 90% are represented as bold lines. The BT2 tree divides T. piceus and T. columbinus isolates into four statistically supported clades while the other three loci place all T. piceus isolates on a single branch and all T. columbinus isolates on another branch. The BT2 primer set appears to be amplifying different gene fragments or the locus may have undergone rearrangements that make the analysis appear paralogous. Genealogical concordance is seen in a majority of the trees, which supports T. columbinus and T. piceus as distinct species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078084.g002

The phylogenetic relationships of T. phialosporus and Penicillium scorteum, and T. atricola, T. rugulosus, P. chrysitis and P. tardum are shown in Fig. 3. T. phialosporus and P. scorteum are conspecific; T. rugulosus P. tardum and P. chrysitis are conspecific, with strong support from concordance analysis and T. atricola is a distinct species.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Genealogical concordance analysis.

Excised portions of phylogenetic trees based on beta tubulin (BT2), calmodulin (CF), minichromosome maintenance factor 7 (Mcm7) and RNA polymerase beta (RPB2). Bootstrap values above 90% are represented as bold lines. Talaromyces atricola is sibling to T. rugulosus at each locus supporting it as a distinct species. Penicillium scorteum has in the past been considered a synonym of T. rugulosus but this analysis shows that P. scorteum is conspecific with T. phialosporus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078084.g003

Temperature and medium dependent colony growth:–Full and reduced model comparison analysis of temperature dependent growth rates (Fig. 4) showed that the equations for T. piceus and T. columbinus were significantly different from each other at α = .01 and.05 levels. Confidence interval overlap on the regression coefficients a, b, and c showed that intercepts (a) and slopes for X (b) and X3 (c) aren’t different between the equations for the 2 species. It appears that T. columbinus and T. piceus show the same colony growth at the lower and higher temperatures extremes tested (10 and 50°C) with growth lagging for T. columbinus at 14.5 through 30°C, then surpassing T. piceus at temperatures 35 through 48°C. Talaromyces columbinus isolates showed no growth below 20°C, while T. piceus isolates all produced small colonies at 14.5°C. Maximum growth appears at ca 35°C, where the growth of T. columbinus exceeds that of T. piceus although the individual isolates are variable. At 44.5°C T. piceus isolates showed little or no growth while T. columbinus isolates’ colonies were 10–20 mm diam.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Temperature dependent growth.

Graphical depiction of temperature dependent colony diameter for isolates of T. piceus (blue line) and T. columbinus (red line). T. piceus growth begins at 14.5°C, T. columbinus begins growth at 20°C, at the upper temperature range (44.5°C) T. columbinus colonies are ca 20 mm diam, while T. piceus isolates mostly do not grow. T. columbinus isolates tend to greater colony diameter at most temperatures but with great variation among the isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078084.g004

Colony diameters of T. piceus and T. columbinus isolates grown for 7d at 25°C on the different media were: for T. columbinus|T. piceus on MEA 10–20 mm|21–27 mm; on OA 10–17 mm|16–22 mm; on CY20S 3–12 mm|10–17 mm; on CYA–5% NaCl no growth|3–15 mm; on DG18 5–7 mm|8–12 mm; and on CREA 5–8 mm|14–18 mm with no acid production in either species.

Taxonomy

Talaromyces columbinus S.W. Peterson and Ž. Jurjević sp. nov. (Fig. 5).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Talaromyces columbinus.

Panels A–D show colonies of NRRL 58811 grown 7d with the specified medium and incubation temperature. There is no growth on NaCl amended CYA medium. Cultures incubated at temperature between 30°C and 46°C produce a dark brown soluble pigment in the agar. The color of the CYA culture at 37°C is the basis of the epithet. E. Conidia mostly globose 2.5–3.5 µm diam and smooth walled with occasional much larger and ovoid individuals, bar = 10 µm. F, G. Penicillus structure with vesiculate stipe, metulae and phialides. Conidia often form conical aggregations apically on the penicillus, bar = 10 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078084.g005

[urn:lsid:indexfungorum.org:names: Mycobank: MB 804732.

Etymology: the epithet refers to the dark bluish-gray colony color on certain media.

Holotype: BPI 892668, a dried culture of NRRL 58811, USA, Louisiana, isol ex air sampler, Ž. Jurjević, October 2008.

Diagnosis: Microscopically similar to T. piceus, producing colonies on CYA with a distinct dark bluish gray color, and growing well at 44.5°C, versus minimal or absent growth at 44.5°C for T. piceus; T. columbinus isolates do not grow on CYA–5% NaCl while T. piceus isolates grow moderately well.

Description: CYA, 7 d, 25°C, colony diam 6–15 mm, conidial area, pea green to Artemisia green (R47); good to abundant conidium production, mycelium overgrown with aerial hyphae in light orange-yellow to orange (R3) shades, periphery light yellow orange occasionally white; velutinous to lightly floccose, centrally rising ca 2–4 mm, occasionally radially sulcate, margin submerged ca 1 mm, exudate when produced clear, yellowish brown; soluble pigment when present faint brownish shades, no sclerotia; reverse xanthine orange to amber brown (R3); MEA, 7 d, 25°C, colony diam 10–27 mm diam, conidial area is Vetiver green to Artemisia green (R47), or bluish green to dark bluish green shades near deep Medici blue (R48), overgrown with low thin, scattered pigmented mycelial fascicles of straw yellow to wax yellow (R16) shades, conidium production abundant to very abundant, low and plane, centrally raised ca 3–4 mm in a cushion ca 3–4 mm diameter; peripherally subsurface or submerged hyphae ca 3–6 mm, lemon yellow (R4), exudate when produced after 10 d yellowish to brownish, sparse, soluble pigment not seen, no sclerotia; reverse xanthine orange (R3) to apricot yellow (R4) peripherally; CY20S, 7 d, 25°C, colony diam (3–)10–12 mm, conidial area pea green to Artemisia green (R47); conidium production abundant to very abundant, mycelium white to crème; reverse uncolored; OM, 7 d, 25°C, colony diam (10–)15–17 mm, conidial area green to olive-green to deep turtle green (R32), conidium production very abundant, mycelium light orange yellow to xanthine orange (R3) centrally, occasionally white to orange yellow at margins, exudate pale yellow occasionally clear to amber brown (R3), commonly abundant, occasionally centrally rising ca 3–5 mm; CREA, 7 d, 25°C, colony diam 5–8 mm, conidial area olive-green, conidium production good, no acid production; DG18, 7 d, 25°C, colony diam 5–6 mm, conidial area cream to light buff (R15), sporulation good, mycelium white, reverse light buff (R15); CYA–5% NaCl, 7 d, 25°C, no growth.

Stipes arise from surface or aerial hyphae, rarely from rope-like hyphal formations, (5–)15–35 (–75)×2.5–3.5(–4.5) µm, with smooth walls, terminally inflated (3–)4–6(–10) µm diam, bearing terminal biverticillate, occasionally monoverticillate or more complex penicilli, metulae in appressed verticils of (3–)8–12, with terminal swelling up to 5 µm diam, 7–10(–12)×(2–)2.5–3.5(–4) µm, phialides 4–7 per metula, acerose 7–10(–12)×(1.5–)1.8–2.2(–2.6) µm, conidia spherical to ellipsoidal (2.2–)2.5–3.5(–8)×2.5–3.5(–5) µm, with smooth to finely roughened walls, borne in short close conical or pyramidal chains.

Talaromyces atricola S. W. Peterson and Ž. Jurjević, comb. et stat. nov.

[urn:lsid:indexfungorum.org:names: Mycobank: MB 804733.

Basionym: Penicillium rugulosum var. atricolum (Bainier) Thom. The Penicillia 1930:474 (Mycobank MB277103).

Thom [15] described a culture received from Bainier labeled Penicillium atricolum as Penicillium rugulosum var. atricolum Thom. That culture exists as NRRL 1052 and proved to represent a species distinct from P. rugulosum (Figs. 1, 3). Accordingly this isolates is given the new name Talaromyces atricola. Holotype is the lyophilized culture NRRL 1052 received by Charles Thom and accessioned into his collection as 4640.439 and later accessioned into the ARS culture collection as NRRL 1052.

Talaromyces scorteus (Nakazawa, Takeda, & Suematsu) S. W. Peterson and Ž. Jurjević, comb. nov. [urn:lsid:indexfungorum.org:names: Mycobank: MB 804734.

Basionym: Penicillium scorteum Nakazawa, Takeda and Suematsu, Journal of Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan 10:103. 1934.

Penicillium scorteum Nakazawa et al.; MB 492647.

 =  Penicillium phialosporum Udagawa; MB 302415.

 =  Talaromyces phialosporus (Udagawa) Samson, Yilmaz & Frisvad; MB560660.

Neotype: BPI 892679 dried colony preparation of NRRL 1129, isolated from military equipment, designated here.

Nakazawa and associates, in accordance with then current rules did not designate a type, but distributed a type isolate (CBS 340.34) which was later obtained by Thom and accessioned in the Agricultural Research Service culture collection as NRRL 1129. This isolate, as dried colonies is designated as the neotype.

Raper and Thom [14] reported the authors of P. scorteum as Takedo, Suematsu and Nakazawa. This error has been perpetuated in the literature e.g., [1], [14], [31]. An interpretation of the original article, which was written mostly in Japanese, reveals that the authors are Nakazawa, Takeda and Suematsu, fide Prof. Junta Sugiyama.

Talaromyces rugulosus (Thom) Samson, Yilmaz, Frisvad & Seifert, MB560672.

Penicillium rugulosum Thom; MB 210907.

 = Penicillium tardum Thom; MB 279778.

 = Penicillium chrysitis Biourge; MB260588.

Discussion

The sequence differences between the three type isolates of T. piceus could arise from sequence reading errors, mishandling of the cultures so that they are no longer identical or on rare occasion copies of the rDNA repeat units have different sequences [32]. The multiple gaps distinguishing the ITS sequences of NRRL 1051 (KF196893), CBS 342.48 (JN899370) and ATCC 10519 (DQ666826) are most easily explained as sequence reading errors. The single base difference between the RPB2 sequences of two T. rugulosus type isolates (NRRL 1048, KF196975 and CBS 391.48, JF417433) appears to be a simple sequence reading error. The ca 20% sequence difference between the RPB1 sequence from two type isolates of P. tardum (NRRL 1073, KF196957 and CBS 258.37, JN899293) is too great to be simple sequencing error and most likely resulted from mishandling of sequence data or cultures. Samson et al. [4] indicated some concern about their sequence from this isolate.

Talaromyces columbinus isolates were collected in air samplers in several widely separated states of the USA and from a sample of corn grits in Illinois. It is widely dispersed in the US. The 100% similarity of the ITS sequence from the lung infection fungus of a patient in Buenos Aires (IMI 392509, DQ666824) with T. columbinus (KF196900) suggests that this infective species is T. columbinus and that the species is present in Argentina, although we have not seen the actual isolate. The patient in Argentina [6] had underlying chronic granulomatous disease that appears to make patients susceptible to opportunistic fungal infection [33]. Another lung infection fungus from a patient in Bonn, Germany [5] was identified by ITS sequence and phenotype. The phenotype suggested P. piceum and the ITS sequence was reported to be similar to that of P. piceum CBS 361.48 but it was not deposited in a public database. The authors of that study [5] made the sequence available to us and it is a 100% match to the sequence from T. columbinus. On this basis we are confident that the German lung infection isolate was T. columbinus. On the basis of 100% ITS sequence similarity, T. columbinus is known from North America, South America and Western Europe.

The phenotypic distinction of T. piceus and T. columbinus relies most notably on the failure of T. columbinus isolates to grow on CYA medium supplemented with 5% NaCl, and by the color of colonies grown at 37°C on CYA (compare Figs. 5, 6). The lack of growth on NaCl supplemented medium appears to be a reaction to the salt rather than an osmotic effect since T. piceus and T. columbinus showed moderate growth on DG18 medium (18% glycerol) and CY20S (20% sucrose). Both species grow above 37°C, but T. columbinus grows well at 44°C while T. piceus isolates mostly fail to grow at this temperature. Colony diameters in the middle area of the temperature growth range show differences by species (Fig. 4) but the variation seen in the isolates of each species makes reliance on this one character dubious.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Talaromyces piceus.

Panels A–D show colonies of NRRL 1051 grown 7 d with the specified medium and incubation temperature. Incubation at 37°C on CYA does not produce the bluish-gray color seen in T. columbinus and exudate is evident on colonies grown at 35–41°C. E. Conidia, subglobose to ellipsoidal, smooth walled 2–2.5×3–3.5 µm. F–H. Penicillus structure very similar to that of T. columbinus including the conical aggregation of conidia at the apex of the penicillus. Bar = 10 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078084.g006

Genealogical concordance analysis of multilocus DNA sequence data from isolates of Talaromyces rugulosus, Penicillium chrysitis and P. tardum revealed that they are conspecific. Penicillium rugulosum, the basionym of T. rugulosus was published in 1910 (MB 210907) and has priority over P. chrysitis Biourge published in 1923 (MB 260588) and P. tardum Thom published in 1930 (MB 279778). Samson et al. [4] placed P. tardum in their tree diagram in a different clade along with T. pinophilus. We carefully checked our data and fungal isolates and are confident that our placement of P. tardum in synonymy with T. rugulosus is correct.

Penicillium rugulosum var. atricolum Thom (MB 274357) was found in concordance analysis to represent a distinct species sibling to T. rugulosus and has been elevated to species status in Talaromyces as T. atricola.

Fungal nomenclature is based on type specimens and publication of names based on those types. If two people should describe the same new species under different names, the name proposed by the author first to publish is chosen as the legitimate name using the principle of priority. There are provisions in the nomenclatural code for conserving a name that may be synonymous with an earlier published name. Generally a name can be conserved if it is associated with significant industrial processes or very widely embedded in literature. A strong case for the advantages of keeping a later synonym as the legitimate name must be made and ruled on [34]. Frisvad et al. [35] proposed preserving the names Penicillium chrysogenum (penicillin producer), Aspergillus niger (enzyme and citrate producer) and Aspergillus nidulans (a model genetic system) and protected status was granted [34]. Slightly later Pitt and Samson [31] generated a comprehensive list of commonly used names in Aspergillus and Penicillium and asked for protected status for all those names. Protection for the names was not granted [34], but following the suggestions of Pitt and Samson [31] was recommended to promote taxonomic stability.

Penicillium scorteum is listed by Raper and Thom [14], Pitt [1] and Pitt et al. [13] as a synonym of P. rugulosum. However as our data analysis (Fig. 3) shows P. scorteum is conspecific with T. phialosporus. Publication of P. scorteum in 1934 (MB 492647) predates the publication of P. phialosporum in 1959 (MB 302415). Talaromyces phialosporus is accepted in the list of names in common use (NCU) [31]. However, Talaromyces phialosporus is not a commonly encountered species [36] and no widely known industrial or medical process is associated with this name. Penicillium scorteum is also a name not often encountered. In this case we adhere to the rule of priority rather than the NCU as neither P. scorteum nor T. phialosporus are commonly used or reported names and this name change will not have widespread disadvantageous effect.

Samson et al. [4] presented a tree diagram based on RPB1 sequences that portrayed T. variabilis, P. concavorugulosum and T. wortmanii as identical. In Fig. 1 there is a clear distinction of each of these species based on RPB2 sequences. Strong statistical support shows that T. wortmanii is a distinct species, but additional analysis based on more isolates and more loci is required to establish the relationship of T. variabilis and P. concavorugulosum under the genealogical concordance paradigm.

The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) in a work with an ISSN or ISBN will represent a published work according to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, and hence the new names contained in the electronic publication of a PLOS ONE article are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone, so there is no longer any need to provide printed copies.

In addition, new names contained in this work have been submitted to MycoBank from where they will be made available to the Global Names Index. The unique MycoBank number can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the MycoBank number contained in this publication to the prefix http://www.mycobank.org/MycoTaxo.aspx?Link=T&Rec=. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the skillful technical assistance of Ms Amy McGovern. Debra Palmquist helped us prepare figure 4. Drs. Scott Redhead and Walter Gams provided expert advice on nomenclature and Latin. Dr. Junta Sugiyama graciously interpreted an article written in Japanese. The authors appreciate Drs. Regine Horré and Sybron De Hoog who shared unpublished ITS sequences. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U. S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SWP ZJ. Performed the experiments: SWP ZJ. Analyzed the data: SWP ZJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SWP ZJ. Wrote the paper: SWP ZJ.

References

  1. 1. Pitt JI (1980) The genus Penicillium and its teleomorphic states Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. London: Academic Press. 634 p.
  2. 2. Berbee ML, Yoshimura A, Sugiyama J, Taylor JW (1995) Is Penicillium monophyletic? An evaluation of phylogeny in the family Trichocomaceae from 18S, 5.8S and ITS ribosomal DNA sequence data. Mycologia 87: 210–222.
  3. 3. McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, et al.. (2012) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Vegetabile 154. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.
  4. 4. Samson RA, Yilmaz N, Houbraken J, Spierenburg H, Seifert KA, et al. (2011) Phylogeny and nomenclature of the genus Talaromyces and taxa accommodated in Penicillium subgenus Biverticillium. Studies in Mycology 70: 159–184.
  5. 5. Horré R, Gilges S, Breig P, Kupfer B, de Hoog GS, et al. (2001) Case report, fungaemia due to Penicillium piceum, a member of the Penicillium marneffei complex. Mycoses 44: 502–504.
  6. 6. Santos PE, Piontelli E, Shea YR, Galluzzo ML, Holland SM, et al. (2006) Penicillium piceum infection: diagnosis and successful treatment in chronic granulomatous disease. Medical Mycology 44: 749–753.
  7. 7. Eremin AN, Moroz IV, Mikhailova RV (2008) Use of cadmium hydroxide gel for isolation of extracellular catalases from Penicillium piceum and characterization of purified enzyme. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 44: 590–599.
  8. 8. Ugaki N, Matsuda D, Yamazaki H, Nonaka K, Masuma R, et al. (2012) New isochaetochromin, an inhibitor of triacylglycerol synthesis in mammalian cells, produced by Penicillium sp. FKI-4942: I. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and biological properties. J Antibiot 65: 15–19.
  9. 9. Sidrim JJC, Moreira Filho RE, Cordeiro RA, Rocha MFG, et al. (2009) Fungal microbiota dynamics as a postmortem investigation tool: focus on Aspergillus, Penicillium and Candida species. Journal of Applied Microbiology 108: 1751–1756.
  10. 10. Manoch L, Dethoup T, Yilmaz N, Houbraken J, Samson RA (2013) Two new Talaromyces species from soil in Thailand. Mycoscience. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2012.12.002 Accessed 2013 May 12.
  11. 11. Visagie CM, Jacobs K (2012) Three new additions to the genus Talaromyces isolated from Atlantis sandveld fynbos soils. Persoonia 28: 14–22.
  12. 12. Yilmaz N, Houbraken J, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC, Visagie CM, et al. (2012) Delimitation and characterisation of Talaromyces purpurogenus and related species. Persoonia 29: 39–54.
  13. 13. Pitt JI, Samson RA, Frisvad JC (2000) List of accepted species and their synonyms in the family Trichocomaceae. In: Samson RA and Pitt JI editors. Integration of modern taxonomic methods for Penicillium and Aspergillus classification. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. 9–50.
  14. 14. Raper KA, Thom C (1949) A manual of the Penicillia. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 875 p.
  15. 15. Thom C (1930) The Penicillia. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkens. 643 p.
  16. 16. Dettman JR, Jacobson DJ, Taylor JW (2003) A multilocus genealogical approach to phylogenetic species recognition in the model eukaryote Neurospora. Evolution 57: 2703–2720.
  17. 17. Samson RA, Houbraken J, Thrane U, Frisvad JC, Andersen B (2010) Food and indoor fungi. Utrecht: CBS-Fungal Biodiversity Centre. 390 p.
  18. 18. SYSTAT Software Inc. website. Available: http://www.systat.com. Accessed 2013 June 20.
  19. 19. Ridgway R (1912) Color standards and color nomenclature. Washington: Published by the author. 96 p.
  20. 20. Soares C, Rodrigues P, Peterson SW, Lima N, Venâncio A (2012) Three new species of Aspergillus section Flavi isolated from almonds and maize in Portugal. Mycologia 104: 682–697.
  21. 21. Horn BW, Olarte RA, Peterson SW, Carbone I (2013) Sexual reproduction in Aspergillus tubingensis from section Nigri. Mycologia 105: 1153–1163.
  22. 22. Hubka V, Kolarik M (2012) ß-tubulin paralogue tubC is frequently misidentified as the benA gene in Aspergillus section Nigri taxonomy: primer specificity testing and taxonomic consequences. Persoonia 29: 1–10.
  23. 23. Affymetrix website. Available: http://www.affymetrix.com. Accessed 2013 June 20.
  24. 24. Applied Biosystems website. Available: http://www.lifetechnologies.com/us/en/website-overview/ab-welcome.html. Accessed 2013 June 20.
  25. 25. Gene Codes Corporation website. Available: http://www.genecodes.com. Accessed 2013 June 20.
  26. 26. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTALW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680.
  27. 27. Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
  28. 28. Page RDM (1996) TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12: 357–358.
  29. 29. Corel website. Available: http://www.corel.com. Accessed 2013 June 20.
  30. 30. Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Souge JL, et al. (2012) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 6241–6246.
  31. 31. Pitt JI, Samson RA (1993) Species names in current use in the Trichocomaceae (Fungi, Eurotiales). In: Greuter W, editor. NCU-2: Names in Current Use in the Families Trichocomaceae, Cladoniaceae, Pinaceae, and Lemnaceae. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. 13–57.
  32. 32. O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E (1997) Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 103–116.
  33. 33. De Ravin SS, Challipalli M, Anderson V, Shea YR, Marciano B, et al.. (2011) Geosmithia argillacea: an emerging cause of invasive mycosis in human chronic granulomatous disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52: e136–e143. Available: doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq250. Accessed 15 April 2011.
  34. 34. Greuter W, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Chaloner WG, Demoulin V, et al.. (1994) International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code). Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. 389 p.
  35. 35. Frisvad JC, Hawksworth DL, Kozakiewicz Z, Pitt JI, Samson RA, et al.. (1990) Proposals to conserve important species names in Aspergillus and Penicillium. In: Samson RA and Pitt JI editors. Modern Concepts in Penicillium and Aspergillus Classification. New York: Plenum Press. 83–89.
  36. 36. Scopus website. Available http://www.scopus.com. Accessed 2013 May 30.