Functional bacterial amyloids (FuBA) are important components in many environmental biofilms where they provide structural integrity to the biofilm, mediate bacterial aggregation and may function as virulence factor by binding specifically to host cell molecules. A novel FuBA system, the Fap system, was previously characterized in the genus Pseudomonas, however, very little is known about the phylogenetic diversity of bacteria with the genetic capacity to apply this system. Studies of genomes and public metagenomes from a diverse range of habitats showed that the Fap system is restricted to only three classes in the phylum Proteobacteria, the Beta-, Gamma- and Deltaproteobacteria. The structural organization of the fap genes into a single fapABCDEF operon is well conserved with minor variations such as a frequent deletion of fapA. A high degree of variation was seen within the primary structure of the major Fap fibril monomers, FapC, whereas the minor monomers, FapB, showed less sequence variation. Comparison of phylogenetic trees based on Fap proteins and the 16S rRNA gene of the corresponding bacteria showed remarkably similar overall topology. This indicates, that horizontal gene transfer is an infrequent event in the evolution of the Fap system.
Citation: Dueholm MS, Otzen D, Nielsen PH (2013) Evolutionary Insight into the Functional Amyloids of the Pseudomonads. PLoS ONE 8(10): e76630. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076630
Editor: Mickaël Desvaux, INRA Clermont-Ferrand Research Center, France
Received: May 14, 2013; Accepted: August 26, 2013; Published: October 7, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Dueholm et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors are grateful to funding from the Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation (BioNET), the Lundbeck Foundation and Aalborg University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Functional bacterial amyloids (FuBA) represent an interesting class of very stable fibrillar protein polymers, in which the monomeric subunits fold as β-strands stacked perpendicular to the fibril axis [1,2]. Bacteria use FuBA for many purposes. The amyloids may act as simple structural proteins providing strength to biofilms and to the coating of spores. They may also have more specialized functions such as mediating specific binding to host cell proteins [3–5]. FuBA can be found within the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix of environmental biofilms from various habitats ranging from drinking water reservoirs and seawater to activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants [6,7]. FuBA are consequently considered important biofilm components.
It has previously been shown that many pseudomonads have the genetic capacity to express FuBA, the Fap system, as a part of their EPS matrix [8,9]. The species include the opportunistic pathogen P. aeruginosa, which is considered the major pathogen in cystic fibrosis airway infections, as P. aeruginosa colonization correlates with the onset of chronic pulmonary symptoms and declining lung function . P. aeruginosa is furthermore a common inhabitant in chronic wounds . P. fluorescens and P. putida also contain the Fap system and strains of these are known plant growth-promoting bacteria, interacting with plant roots through, among other factors, secreted proteins and biofilm formation [12,13]. Furthermore, strains of P. putida are prime candidates for bioremediation as they metabolize organic solvents and environmental toxins [14,15].
The Fap amyloid in Pseudomonas is expressed from a single operon, fapABCDEF [8,9]. FapC represents the major subunit of the mature Fap fibril, whereas FapB is a minor constituent. The exact function of FapB is unknown, but based on sequence similarity it has been suggested, that FapB might act as a nucleator analogue to CsgB in the E. coli curli amyloid system. Alternatively, it may be an integral part of the mature fibril, which could be used to modulate the physiochemical properties of the amyloid fibril. FapA affects the distribution of FapC and FapB in the mature Fap fibrils and is likely a chaperone for these monomers. Structural predictions suggest that FapD is likely a cysteine protease . FapD could consequently have proteolytic activity relevant for processing the Fap proteins. Small amounts of FapE are found together with purified Fap fibrils. Accordingly, it could be hypothesized that FapE may represent an extracellular chaperone, guiding the fibrillation process. However, the exact function of FapE has to be confirmed. FapF is located in the outer membrane, where it according to structural predictions forms a β-barrel. It is a likely candidate for an outer-membrane pore for FapB and FapC secretion to the extracellular environment .
Recombinant overexpression of the fap operon results in highly aggregative phenotypes with enhanced biofilm forming capacity. The Fap fibrils are therefore considered structural components of Pseudomonas biofilms. However, Fap fibrils may also have more specialized functions. It is likely that P. aeruginosa utilizes Fap fibrils as virulence factors. This hypothesis is based on the identification of a fapC deletion mutant of P. aeruginosa as one of the most attenuated mutants, among 480 random transposon deletion mutants, in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model and in a polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes phagocytosis assay .
Although FuBA are abundant in nature, only a few FuBA systems have been identified so far and very little is known about the phylogenetic diversity of these systems. Consequently, it is not known whether the distribution of functional bacterial amyloids (FuBA) in natural systems result from a few phylogenetically widespread, but evolutionarily related FuBA systems, or from many independently evolved systems present within narrow groups of bacteria. Our investigations of the curli systems (Csg) showed that it was phylogenetically much more widespread then initially assumed, spanning at least four bacterial phyla . Accordingly, this supports the idea that a few phylogenetic widespread FuBA systems could be responsible the high abundance of amyloids seen in environmental biofilms. However, insight from the phylogenetic diversity of a single FuBA system does not allow us to make any conclusions regarding this hypothesis. In order to gain a better understanding of the phylogenetic diversity of FuBA systems, we here present an investigation of the diversity of the Fap system.
We only found homologous Fap systems within species belonging to the Gamma-, Beta-, and the Deltaproteobacteria. Thus, these systems are much less widespread than the curli systems. The overall Fap operon structure is maintained between bacterial taxa in clear contrast to the instability seen for the curli operon. There is no evidence of horizontal gene transfer in the spreading of the Fap systems across genera. The Fap system may consequently be described as an evolutionarily young FuBA system compared to the curli system.
Fap Genes are Phylogenetically Widespread
An initial identification of homologous Fap proteins within the refseq protein database was performed using PSI-Blast searches with the Fap proteins from P. aeruginosa PAO1 as query sequences (Table S1). The hits were manually curated and additional homologs were identified by manual examination of protein coding sequences (CDS) in the genomic neighborhood of the hits. The identified Fap homologs showed a high degree of variability in terms of primary structure. The average sequence identity between the Fap proteins from P. aeruginosa PAO1 and homologs outside the order of Pseudomonadales were 17% for FapA, 23% for FapB, 18% for FapC, 39% for FapD, 21% for FapE, and 32% for FapF.
Purely sequence-based methods, such as Blast searches, may not be able to detect evolutionarily related protein sequences if these have been subjected to intensive recombination and fast evolution . The low sequence identity between Fap homologs suggests that divergence could provide a problem when searching for homologs. Profile hidden Markov models (HMMs) provide better detection of remote homologs than Blast searches [18,19]. The curated Fap homologs were consequently used to generate HMMs of the Fap proteins. As the putative nucleator protein FapB and the major Fap subunit FapC are internal homologs and these proteins are highly variable, a combined FapB/C HMM was constructed based exclusively on the repeat regions described by Dueholm et al. . The HMMs were able to identify additional Fap homologs. The additional hits were curated as described earlier and the expanded Fap protein database was used to generate improved HMMs (Table 1 and HMMs S1). The iterative process was repeated until no additional homologs could be identified (Table S1).
|Target||HMM hits||Curated database||Correct hits||Missing hits|
|FapA||56||58||56/56 (100%)||2/58 (3%)|
|FapBC||138||135||135/138 (99%)||0/135 (0%)|
|FapD||1594||70||70/1594 (4%)||0/70 (0%)|
|FapE||71||69||69/71 (97%)||0/69 (0%)|
|FapF||217||69||68/217 (31%)||1/69 (1%)|
The curated HMMs in general performed very well (Table 1). The FapB/C repeat model was able to detect 100% of all FapB/C proteins in our homolog database when applied to the refseq protein database. However, it also produced two false positive (corresponding to 1%). One of the false positives was found in the genome sequence of Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans. It contained two genuine Fap repeats and is very likely part of a partially deleted fap operon. The other false positive was a Bacteriodetes cell surface protein, which had five leucine rich repeat regions with some similarities to the Fap repeat regions. The curated FapA and FapE HMMs were very sensitive and highly specific. The FapA HMM did not include any false positives, making this model an excellent tool for the identification of novel Fap systems within metagenomes (see later). The FapE HMM was also able to identify all homologs, but also included two false positives. These false positives are very likely remains of partially deleted fap operons. One of the false positives was found in the genome sequence of the same strain of A. ferrivorans as the false positive FapB/C hit and the other was found in the Burkholderia, a bacterial family where the Fap system is frequently encountered. The curated FapD and FapF HMMs were both very sensitive but their specificity was very low, as seen by the high number of false positives, 96% and 69%, respectively. The non-specific hits likely indicate that FapD and FapF are part of two larger protein families.
The combination of HMM searches and manual examination of the surrounding gene neighborhoods allowed identification of many novel Fap systems. They were all found within the Proteobacteria (Figure 1 and Table S1) and not in any other phylum with genomes available. The majority of the hits originated from the classes Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria, and a single system was identified within the genus Desulfohalobium of the Deltaproteobacteria. The Fap system could be found within 15% (4/60), 10% (9/91), and 4% (1/26) of the Beta-, Gamma-, and Deltaproteobacteria genera for with bacteria have been genome sequenced, respectively. This corresponds to 9.4%, 8.2%, and 0.7% of all genomes among the sequenced Beta-, Gamma-, and Deltaproteobacteria, respectively.
Taxonomic analysis was performed based on the NCBI taxonomy and visualized using MEGAN . The number of strains containing Fap systems within each genus is indicated next to the taxa and illustrated through the diameter of the circle. Note that these numbers are highly influenced by the number of sequenced strains within each phylogenetic group and do not reflect the prevalence of Fap systems within these groups. Organization of the fap operons is illustrated for each genus.
Conservation and Organization of fap Genes
The arrangement into a single fapABCDEF operon was seen for all bacterial taxa, except for the genera Chromobacterium and Laribacter of the Betaproteobacteria, Desulfohalobium of the Deltaprotebacteria, and Acidithiobacillus, Aeromonas, Shewanella, and Vibrio of the Gammaproteobacteria (Figure 1). The most common deviations from the basis operon structure were the deletion of fapA and the separation of fapF from the main fap operon (Figure 1).
Conservation of the Fap Fibril Monomers and Repeat Regions
Homologs of the major Fap subunit FapC homologs had a similarly ordered primary structure composed of an N-terminal region, followed by three Fap repeats regions interspaced by linker regions and finally a C-terminal region. The FapC homologs displayed a large variation in size (377±143 (average ± standard deviation) amino acid residues). This variation in size is mainly due to highly variable linker regions. The variations from the common theme were FapC from Desulfohalobium, which lacks one repeat region, and the homolog from Laribacter, which contains an additional repeat (Figure 2). Acidithiobacillus and Vibrio stand out by having an even greater number (4-16) of FapC repeats.
The phylogeny is based on the NCBI taxonomy. Bold residues represent 50% (black), 80% (blue) and 100% (red) conserved residues. Note that the conservation is highly biased by the number of sequenced strains and internal repeat units within the Fap proteins of each genus.
FapB shared the same overall primary structure as FapC, but did not show the same variability in size (196±14 amino acid residues). The repeat regions were in most cases separated by linker regions of the same size. FapB from Acidithiobacillus and Aeromonas stand out by having only two repeat regions and only a single repeat region was seen for FapB in Vibrio (Figure 2).
A comparison of the FapB and FapC repeat regions from the different genera showed that only four out of 39 amino acids residues are fully conserved in the repeat regions of each protein. It is also interesting to notice the repeat regions of FapC were more conserved than those of FapB, having 56±25% and 45±26% average residue conservations, respectively.
Evolution of Fap Systems
A comparison of phylogenetic trees based on functional genes or protein sequences with those of 16S rRNA gene sequences for the corresponding bacteria can be used to track the evolutionary history and allows differentiation between horizontal and vertical transmission of the functional genes. Phylogenetic trees based on the FapA, FapD, and FapF protein sequences and the 16S rRNA genes of the corresponding bacteria demonstrated remarkably similar overall topology (Figure 3). Fap homologs from all genera were localized in narrow genus-specific clusters. These observations imply that horizontal gene transfer was absent or only played a minor role in the spreading of the Fap system, and that the Fap systems might have evolved from a common ancestor. However, the low bootstrap support for the early branches makes it impossible to reliably determine the evolutionary origin of the Fap system.
Comparison of phylogenetic trees based on the FapA, FapD and FapF protein sequences and corresponding 16S rRNA genes. The phylogenetic trees were estimated using the neighbor-joining method. Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences could not be obtained for all Fap containing strains due to gaps in genome sequences. The phylogenetic tree is colored according to taxonomy. Betaproteobacteria (blue), Gammaproteobacteria (brown), and Deltaproteobacteria (red). Nonparametric bootstrap values are shown for each node. No bootstrap value represent 100% bootstrap support.
Fap Systems within Metagenomes
The number of genome-sequenced bacteria has increased rapidly over the last couple of years. However, there is still a strong bias towards clinically relevant and cultivable bacterial strains. The highly specific FapA, FapB/C repeat, and FapE HMMs were therefore used to identify Fap systems within ten large metagenomes covering a broad range of habitats (Table 2). Fap systems could be identified within 50% of the metagenomes. The FapA hits were aligned with the FapA proteins identified within the Refseq protein database in order to produce a phylogenetic tree (Figure 4). We were not able to construct a similar tree for FapE due to the low quality of the FapE metagenome hits (the hits corresponded to protein fragments). The FapA hits were all found within the phylogenetic tree of the previously identified FapA homologs. One of the hits showed up within the genus Pseudomonas. The remaining four hits were related to the Xanthomonadales (Rhodanobacter and Stenotrophomonas), but the evolutionary distances suggest these hits likely originate from another bacterial order for which we still lack genome-sequenced strains with the fap operon.
|Metagenome name||Abbreviation||Size (proteins)||FapA||FapB/C||FapE||IMG/M taxon object id|
|Guaymas Basin hydrothermal plume||Hydrothermal plume||319,874||0||0||0||2061766003|
|Soil microbial communities from sample at FACE Site Metagenome||Soil||1,057,446||0||0||0||2124908009|
|Mesophilic rice straw/compost enrichment metagenome||Mesophilic compost enrichment||840,360||2||3||3||2199352012|
|Thermophilic rice straw/compost enrichment metagenome||Thermophilic compost enrichment||432,661||1||3||2||2199352008|
|Fresh water microbial communities from LaBonte Lake, Laramie, Wyoming, sample from algal/cyanobacterial bloom material peak-bloom 2||Fresh water||665,401||0||0||0||2189573023|
|Sediment microbial communities from Arctic Ocean, off the coast from Alaska, sample from low methane PC12-247-20cm||Artic ocean sediment||784,879||0||1||1||2100351001|
|Fungus garden microbial communities from Atta colombica in Panama, sample from dump||Fungus garden||1,285,907||2||9||2||2038011000|
|Svalbard Reindeer rumen metagenome||Reindeer rumen||813,781||0||0||0||2088090000|
|HumanGut BGI gene set||Human gut||3,064,560||0||0||0||44480441|
|Aalborg West enhanced biological phosphor removal waste water treatment plant||Aalborg West EBPR||1,636,090||0||5||1||Not published|
FapA homologs were identified using the respective HMMs within 10 large metagenomes from a diverse range of habitats, see Table 2. The hits were aligned with the FapA homologs identified within the refseq protein database and phylogenetic trees were estimated using the neighbor-joining method. The phylogenetic tree is colored according to taxonomy. Betaproteobacteria (blue), Gammaproteobacteria (brown), and Deltaproteobacteria (red). Metagenome hits are highlighted in red text. Nonparametric bootstrap values are shown for each node. The absence of a bootstrap value represent 100% bootstrap support.
Phylogenetic Diversity of the Fap System
The Fap system was phylogenetic restricted to three classes within the Proteobacteria, and does not match the phylogenetic diversity seen for the curli system, which spans at least four bacterial phyla . The absence of noticeable horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of Fap system combined with the lower phylogenetic divergence implies that the Fap system is an evolutionarily young FuBA system compared to the curli system.
The identification of Fap systems within metagenomes from diverse habitats ranging from compost enrichments and fungus gardens to Artic Ocean sediments and wastewater treatment plants is in good agreement with the wide range of habitats covered by the bacteria containing the fap operon. It should be noticed that genera containing the fap operon involve both aerobes, such as Pseudomonas and strict anaerobes, such as Desulfohalobium. Fap producing bacteria may hence be encountered in most habitats.
Fap Systems within Pathogenic Bacteria
Fap fibrils have been suggested to function as virulence factors for P. aeruginosa, as deletion of the fapC gene in a P. aeruginosa strain resulted in a highly attenuated phenotype in a polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes phagocytosis assay [9,16]. It is therefore interesting to notice that several other bacteria containing the genetic elements to produce Fap are pathogens. They include Aeromonas caviae and Laribacter hongkongensis, which can both cause gastroenteritis and diarrhea [20,21]. Many of the other pathogenic bacteria identified are associated with opportunistic infections in the airway and lungs of patients suffering from cystic fibrosis and infections in immunocompromised individuals. These pathogenic species include Burkholderia gladioli, B. pseudomallei, Ralstonia pikettii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [22,23]. Chromobacterium violaceum is a rare pathogen, but it is associated with high mortality due to a rapid progress to sepsis with metastatic abscess in the liver, lung, or spleen . The high frequency of known pathogen strains within the identified bacteria carrying the fap operon (39%) combined with results from the phagocytosis assay implies, that Fap might be involved in virulence. However, not all pathogenic species of the genera Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas contain the genetic elements required for Fap expression. For example, the B. cepacia complex, which is a major pathogen of the Burkholderia genus, does not contain any fap genes. Fap is consequently not a requirement for pathogenicity, but may rather be a virulence enhancement factor. Additional experiments are required to confirm the virulence enhancing function of Fap for the pathogenic strains.
Fap Systems within Plant Root-Associated Bacteria
The rhizosphere of plants provides a nutrient rich environment compared to the bulk soil, due to the release of root exudates. This ecological niche promotes the growth of mutualistic and commensal bacteria, which in turn provide the plant with protection against plant pathogens through the secretion of antibiotics and better access to nutrients via the secretion of hydrolytic exoenzymes [25,26]. It is now widely acknowledged that the ability to form biofilms is valuable if not a necessity for bacteria interacting with plant root [25,27]. The biofilm lifestyle provides the bacteria with a handful of advantages, such as increased resistance to environmental stresses and protection from protozoan grazing [28,29]. It furthermore provides the bacteria with an opportunity for metabolic cooperation as well as cross-feeding between different bacterial species residing in close proximity within microcolonies .
It is interesting to notice that many of the fap carrying bacteria identified in the study are known rhizobacteria (36%). These are mainly found within orders Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales and Xanthomonadeles. Currently, it is not known whether these bacteria use Fap when they associate with plant roots. However, the fact that the Fap system in P. aeruginosa PAO1 has a higher expression at temperatures below 30°C and that Fap in general are highly potent biofilm mediators suggest that this might be the case . The involvement of FuBA in plant root colonization has been confirmed for the curli system . It was shown that the plant growth-promoting Enterobacter cloacae GS1 expresses curli during root colonization and deletion of curli genes attenuated the plant growth promoting activity.
It has been suggested that certain bacteria, such as S. maltophilia may protect plants against nematode attacks, as clinical isolates of these bacteria are highly virulent in nematode killing assays . High virulence was in a similar assay also observed for P. aeruginosa. However, in the latter experiment it was shown that deletion of fapC, coding for the major component of the Fap fibril, attenuated the virulence . Fap may consequently play a role as a nematocidal agent in the rhizosphere.
Conserved Operon Structure
The fap operons are remarkably conserved when compared to the unstable operons of the curli systems . This is in line with an evolutionarily young FuBA system. However, there are some deviations from the common fapABCDEF theme. The most common deviation (6/16 genera) is an absence of fapA. Deletion of fapA has been shown to affect the distribution of FapB and FapC in the mature Fap fibrils in Pseudomonas, but it does not disrupt Fap dependent biofilm formation . Strains that lack fapA may consequently produce functional Fap fibrils. Another common deviation (4/16 genera) is the separation of fapF from the main fap operon. Splitting the fap operon in two does not necessarily impair its function, but it requires the introduction of a new promoter region linked to fapF. A promoter region containing -35 and -10 regions could be identified in front of the lone fapF in Chromobacterium using the prokaryotic promoter prediction tool Softberry-BPROM (http://linux1.softberry.com). No promoter regions were found in front of the detached fapF within the other genera. However, the fapF genes of these genera were closely associated with upstream genes. It is therefore possible that fapF is integrated in a novel operon structure.
Conservation of the Fap Fibril Subunits
A substantial variation in the primary structure and number of repeat units within the major curli subunit across taxa was previously reported . The major Fap subunit also shows considerable variation in is primary structure, however the number of repeat units are highly conserved with the exception of Laribacter, Desulfohalobium, Acidithiobacillus, and Vibrio. The major variations between FapC homologs are seen in the linker regions separating the repeat units. The current model of the mature Fap fibril suggests that the repeat units make up the tight amyloid core, whereas the linker regions are exposed and in direct contact with the external environment . If this is the case, the variation in the linker regions could be used to modulate the chemical properties of the Fap fibrils or mediate their binding to specific interaction partners.
A comparison of the FapC repeat regions from the different genera shows that only four amino acids residues (10%) are fully conserved. This is in the same range as for the curli repeats where three amino acid residues are fully conserved (14%) . However, the average residue conservation of the Fap repeats across all homologs (47±24%) is higher than for the curli repeats, even if the latter is examined solely for the Enterobacteriales (42±30%). This is in good agreement with the idea that the linker regions determine the properties of different Fap homologs and the repeat regions constitute a common amyloid scaffold. As there are no linker regions in the curli subunits, the curli fibril properties have to be determined by the repeat unit sequences. The repeat units in CsgB are structurally better conserved than those in CsgA. The higher degree of repeat conservation within CsgB has been proposed to be due to the need for additional structural constraints within a nucleator protein . The homology of FapB with FapC and the presence of small amount of FapB in mature fibril purifications suggests, that FapB is a putative nucleator protein in the Fap system analogous to CsgB in the curli system [8,9]. Alternatively, FapB could be an integral part of the mature fibril, which modulates the physiochemical properties of the mature Fap fibril. Surprisingly, the repeat regions of FapB are less conserved than those in FapC. However, the smaller size and the more conserved linker regions in FapB may provide the additional structural constraints. The more conserved repeat units in FapC might provide an additional stability to the amyloid core required to maintain the structure despite highly dynamic exposed linker regions.
Increased Number of Repeat Units in Acidithiobacillus and Vibrio
The Fap systems of Acidithiobacillus and Vibrio provide some interesting deviations from the common Fap theme. FapB from Acidithiobacillus and Vibrio contains only two and one repeat unit, respectively. It may subsequently be suspected that these bacteria are not able to produce functional Fap, assuming a nucleator function of FapB. However, the FapC homologs of Acidithiobacillus and Vibrio contain 4-8 and 16 repeat units each. These bacteria may thus rely on self-nucleation by the repeat expansion within FapC instead of the proposed heterologous nucleation by FapB. This hypothesis is supported by in vitro studies on repeat domain expansion of prion proteins, showing that repeat unit expansion increase aggregation propensity and kinetics of amyloid fibril formation, the latter to such a degree that no lag phase can be observed [33,34]. The absence of a lag phase in fibril formation abolishes the need for a nucleator protein.
Amyloid marker probes have shown that FuBA can be found within most, if not all, environmental biofilms . Despite the omnipresence of FuBA, very few FuBA systems have so far been characterized and little is known about which bacteria use these fascinating structures and for what purposes. This study has uncovered the phylogenetic diversity of the Fap system. This provides a platform for future studies aiming at determining the function of Fap in various settings. The addition of fap deletion strain and fap based RT-qPCR assays in animal infection models and in plant growth promoting studies may uncover more on the function of Fap systems. The relatively narrow phylogenetic diversity of the Fap system compared to the curli amyloid systems supports the hypothesis that there may be a range of independently evolved FuBA systems. Consequently, many novel FuBA systems may be discovered across the various microbial phyla.
Identification of Homologous Fap Systems
Fap homologs were initially identified by PSI-Blast searches (default settings, blosum45 scoring matrix, E-value<1) against the refseq protein database using Fap proteins from P. fluorescens UK4 as query sequences . The hits were manually curated based on overall proteins primary structure and gene location relative to that of related fap gene homologs. Additional homologs were identified by alignment of CDS in the genomic neighborhood of identified fap gene homologs with the previously identified Fap homologs. The curated Fap protein dataset were aligned (ClustalW, gap opening cost (GOC)=15 and gap extension cost (GEC)=1) and used to generate HMMs for the Fap proteins using hmmbuild of the HMMER 3.0 package after removal of redundant proteins. The structural flexibility and low sequence similarity outside the repeat regions of FapB and FapC made confident sequence alignment of the proteins impossible. A combined FapB/C HMM was therefore made in the same way based solely on the repeat regions. The hmmsearch command of the HMMER 3.0 package was used together with the HMMs to search for additional Fap proteins within the refseq protein database. Hits below the inclusion threshold of the HMMs (E-value≈0.01) were discarded. The hits were curated and included in the Fap homolog database and the expanded datasets were used to generate improved HMMs (HMMs S1). This process was repeated until no further homologs could be identified. Identification of Fap homologs within the metagenome databases was done using a similar approach.
Fap Repeat Identification
Fap repeats were identified by motif search in CLC DNA workbench 5.7.1 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark) using a java regular expression of the minimalistic Fap repeat (X15GX 4NX 3GX 6NX7). All repeat regions from bacteria within the same genus were aligned (ClustalW, GOC=50 and GEC=1) in order to determine repeat region consensus sequences.
16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained for bacterial strains containing homologous Fap systems from the Silva 16S rRNA database (http://www.arb-silva.de/). The 16S rRNA gene sequences were aligned using the SINA v. 1.2.9 aligner (http://www.arb-silva.de/aligner/) and imported to the ARB software . The aligned 16S rRNA genes were used to calculate phylogenetic trees based on the ARB neighbor-joining method provided in the software using the default settings. Homolog Fap protein sequences were aligned (ClustalW, GOC=15 and GEC=1) and imported into ARB. Phylogenetic trees were similarly calculated based on the ARB neighbor-joining method using the default settings. No corrections were applied for among site variation.
Curated hidden Markov models for the Fap proteins.
Fap Protein Homologs Identified within the Refseq Protein Database. Fap homologs were identified using PSI-Blast searches with the Fap proteins from P. aeruginosa PAO1 as query sequences as well as the created HMMs and manual examination of the surrounding gene neighborhoods.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MSD DO PHN. Performed the experiments: MSD. Analyzed the data: MSD DO PHN. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MSD DO PHN. Wrote the manuscript: MSD DO PHN.
- 1. Dobson CM (2003) Protein folding and misfolding. Nature 426: 884–890. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02261. PubMed: 14685248.
- 2. Gebbink MF, Claessen D, Bouma B, Dijkhuizen L, Wösten HA (2005) Amyloids--a functional coat for microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 333–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1127. PubMed: 15806095.
- 3. Nielsen PH, Dueholm MS, Thomsen TR, Nielsen JL, Otzen D (2011) Functional bacterial amyloids in biofilms. In: H-C FlemmingJ. WingenderU. Szewzyk. Biofilm highlights, Vol. 5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 41–62.
- 4. Dueholm MS, Nielsen PH, Chapman M, Otzen D (2013) Functional amyloids in bacteria. In: DE Otzen. Amyloid fibrils and prefibrillar aggregates. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. pp. 411–438.
- 5. Barnhart MM, Chapman MR (2006) Curli biogenesis and function. Annu Rev Microbiol 60: 131–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142106. PubMed: 16704339.
- 6. Larsen P, Nielsen JL, Dueholm MS, Wetzel R, Otzen D et al. (2007) Amyloid adhesins are abundant in natural biofilms. Environ Microbiol 9: 3077–3090. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01418.x. PubMed: 17991035.
- 7. Larsen P, Nielsen JL, Otzen D, Nielsen PH (2008) Amyloid-like adhesins produced by floc-forming and filamentous bacteria in activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 1517–1526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02274-07. PubMed: 18192426.
- 8. Dueholm MS, Petersen SV, Sønderkaer M, Larsen P, Christiansen G et al. (2010) Functional amyloid in Pseudomonas. Mol Microbiol 77: 1009–1020. PubMed: 20572935.
- 9. Dueholm MS, Søndergaard MT, Nilsson M, Christiansen G, Stensballe A et al. (2013) Expression of Fap amyloids in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. fluorescens, and P. putida results in aggregation and increased biofilm formation. Microbiologyopen. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.81.
- 10. Palmer KL, Mashburn LM, Singh PK, Whiteley M (2005) Cystic fibrosis sputum supports growth and cues key aspects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa physiology. J Bacteriol 187: 5267–5277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.15.5267-5277.2005. PubMed: 16030221.
- 11. Kirketerp-Møller K, Jensen PØ, Fazli M, Madsen KG, Pedersen J et al. (2008) Distribution, organization, and ecology of bacteria in chronic wounds. J Clin Microbiol 46: 2717–2722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00501-08. PubMed: 18508940.
- 12. Espinosa-Urgel M, Salido A, Ramos J-L (2000) Genetic analysis of functions involved in adhesion of Pseudomonas putida to seeds. J Bacteriol 182: 2363–2369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.9.2363-2369.2000. PubMed: 10762233.
- 13. Haas D, Défago G (2005) Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 307–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1129. PubMed: 15759041.
- 14. Parales RE, Ditty JL, Harwood CS (2000) Toluene-degrading bacteria are chemotactic towards the environmental pollutants benzene, toluene, and trichloroethylene. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 4098–4104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.9.4098-4104.2000. PubMed: 10966434.
- 15. Attaway HH, Schmidt MG (2002) Tandem biodegradation of BTEX components by two Pseudomonas sp. Curr Microbiol 45: 30–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-001-0053-1. PubMed: 12029524.
- 16. Wiehlmann L, Munder A, Adams T, Juhas M, Kolmar H et al. (2007) Functional genomics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to identify habitat-specific determinants of pathogenicity. Int J Med Microbiol 297: 615–623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.03.014. PubMed: 17481950.
- 17. Dueholm MS, Albertsen M, Otzen D, Nielsen PH (2012) Curli functional amyloid systems are phylogenetically widespread and display large diversity in operon and protein structure. PLOS ONE 7: e51274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051274. PubMed: 23251478.
- 18. Madera M, Gough J (2002) A comparison of profile hidden markov model procedures for remote homology detection. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 4321–4328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf544. PubMed: 12364612.
- 19. Eddy SR (2011) Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLOS Comput Biol 7: e1002195. PubMed: 22039361.
- 20. Beatson SA, das Graças de Luna M, Bachmann NL, Alikhan N-F, Hanks KR et al. (2011) Genome sequence of the emerging pathogen Aeromonas caviae. J Bacteriol 193: 1286–1287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01337-10. PubMed: 21183677.
- 21. Woo PCY, Lau SKP, Tse H, Teng JLL, Curreem SOT et al. (2009) The complete genome and proteome of Laribacter hongkongensis reveal potential mechanisms for adaptations to different temperatures and habitats. PLOS Genet 5: e1000416. PubMed: 19283063.
- 22. LiPuma JJ (2003) Burkholderia and emerging pathogens in cystic fibrosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 24: 681–692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-815664. PubMed: 16088584.
- 23. Segonds C, Clavel-Batut P, Thouverez M, Grenet D, Coustumier AL et al. (2009) Microbiological and epidemiological features of clinical respiratory isolates of Burkholderia gladioli. J Clin Microbiol 47: 1510–1516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02489-08. PubMed: 19297595.
- 24. Yang C-H, Li Y-H (2011) Chromobacterium violaceum infection: A clinical review of an important but neglected infection. J Chin Med Assoc 74: 435–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2011.08.013. PubMed: 22036134.
- 25. Danhorn T, Fuqua C (2007) Biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 61: 401–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093316. PubMed: 17506679.
- 26. Seneviratne G, Weerasekara MLMAW, Seneviratne KACN, Zavahir JS, Kecskés ML et al. (2011) Importance of biofilm formation in plant growth promoting rhizobacterial action. In: DK Maheshwari. Plant growth and health promoting bacteria. Microbiology monographs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 81–95.
- 27. Rudrappa T, Biedrzycki ML, Bais HP (2008) Causes and consequences of plant-associated biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64: 153–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00465.x. PubMed: 18355294.
- 28. López D, Vlamakis H, Kolter R (2010) Biofilms. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000398. PubMed: 20519345.
- 29. Matz C, Kjelleberg S (2005) Off the hook – how bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol 13: 302–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2005.05.009. PubMed: 15935676.
- 30. Costerton JW (1995) Overview of microbial biofilms. J Ind Microbiol 15: 137–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569816. PubMed: 8519468.
- 31. Shankar M, Ponraj P, Illakkiam D, Rajendhran J, Gunasekaran P (2013) Inactivation of the transcriptional regulator-encoding gene sdiA enhances rice root colonization and biofilm formation in Enterobacter cloacae GS1. J Bacteriol 195: 39–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01236-12. PubMed: 23086212.
- 32. Ryan RP, Monchy S, Cardinale M, Taghavi S, Crossman L et al. (2009) The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 514–525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2163. PubMed: 19528958.
- 33. Tank EMH, Harris DA, Desai AA, True HL (2007) Prion protein repeat expansion results in increased aggregation and reveals phenotypic variability. Mol Cell Biol 27: 5445–5455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02127-06. PubMed: 17548473.
- 34. Kalastavadi T, True HL (2008) Prion protein insertional mutations increase aggregation propensity but not fiber stability. BMC Biochem 9: 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-9-S1-S7. PubMed: 18366654.
- 35. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. PubMed: 2231712.
- 36. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H et al. (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1363–1371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh293. PubMed: 14985472.
- 37. Huson DH, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh H-J, Weber N, Schuster SC (2011) Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res 21: 1552–1560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.120618.111. PubMed: 21690186.