Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Eeyore: A Novel Mouse Model of Hereditary Deafness

  • Kerry A. Miller ,

    Affiliation Genetic Hearing Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Louise H. Williams,

    Affiliation Genetic Hearing Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Hans-Henrik M. Dahl,

    Affiliations Genetic Hearing Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, The HEARing CRC, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Shehnaaz S. M. Manji

    Affiliations Genetic Hearing Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, The HEARing CRC, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Eeyore: A Novel Mouse Model of Hereditary Deafness

  • Kerry A. Miller, 
  • Louise H. Williams, 
  • Hans-Henrik M. Dahl, 
  • Shehnaaz S. M. Manji


Animal models that recapitulate human disease are proving to be an invaluable tool in the identification of novel disease-associated genes. These models can improve our understanding of the complex genetic mechanisms involved in disease and provide a basis to guide therapeutic strategies to combat these conditions. We have identified a novel mouse model of non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss with linkage to a region on chromosome 18. Eeyore mutant mice have early onset progressive hearing impairment and show abnormal structure of the sensory epithelium from as early as 4 weeks of age. Ultrastructural and histological analyses show irregular hair cell structure and degeneration of the sensory hair bundles in the cochlea. The identification of new genes involved in hearing is central to understanding the complex genetic pathways involved in the hearing process and the loci at which these pathways are interrupted in people with a genetic hearing loss. We therefore discuss possible candidate genes within the linkage region identified in eeyore that may underlie the deafness phenotype in these mice. Eeyore provides a new model of hereditary sensorineural deafness and will be an important tool in the search for novel deafness genes.


Despite advances in our knowledge of genes that contribute to human disease, in many cases the causative gene remains unknown. The use of animal models in the search for causative disease genes has been revolutionary in providing insights into complex mammalian developmental and genetic pathways [1], [2]. Mouse models are often used to elucidate the role of genes in human hearing loss as investigations of the auditory system can be extrapolated across species due to the high conservation of structures such as the cochlea [3], [4]. An accurate and well-characterised mouse model is also necessary for the development of novel treatments and studies into the relationship played between genetics and the environment in conditions such as deafness with a multiplicity of aetiologies.

Hearing loss is the most prevalent sensory impairment in man, affecting as many as 1 in 500 newborns [5], with many suffering a progressive loss [6]. A fully functional auditory system in humans is necessary for communication and perception of the surrounding environment. Even a minor level of hearing loss can impact on lifelong social, financial, vocational and education needs [7]. Hearing loss aetiology is largely genetic, where 70% of non-syndromic congenital deafness is caused by a genetic mutation [5]. The extreme heterogeneity of this condition reflects the complexity of the human auditory system, with over 200 genes thought to contribute to audition [8]. To date, 70 genes have been shown to play a role in non-syndromic, hereditary hearing loss (NSHL), which can be transmitted by autosomal, recessive, dominant, sex-linked or mitochondrial modes of inheritance ( In addition, the same gene can cause syndromic or non-syndromic forms of deafness and some recessive forms can even be caused by two mutations in different genes that are from the same functional group [9]. Inherited hearing loss is non-syndromic in 70% of reported cases, where 80% of these are inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern [5], [10]. In order to fully explore the fundamental molecular and biological pathways required to maintain normal hearing, the identification of new animal models that mimic the hearing loss seen in humans is imperative for research into this domain.

We have identified a novel mouse model of non-syndromic, sensorineural hearing loss via a comprehensive ENU (N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea) mouse screen at the Australian Phenomics Facility (APF). The hearing loss is congenital in these mice and affected progeny show abnormal structural morphology within the cochlear sensory regions. The causative mutation is inherited as a single recessive locus on chromosome 18, between 12,368,762 and 33,968,545 Mb. To date no genes in this region have been associated with human hearing loss. Genes within this linkage region are therefore novel candidates for human hereditary hearing loss and identification of the causative mutation will provide additional insights into the genetic pathways responsible for the correct maintenance of hearing.


The eeyore mouse

All procedures were approved by the Royal Children's Hospital Animal Ethics Committee, RCH AEEC #A585. Mice were screened for hearing loss as part of a large-scale ENU mutagenesis program at the APF, as described previously [11]. Frozen embryos and sperm from the eeyore strain are stored at the Transgenic Animal Service of Queensland (TASQ), Australia (

Hearing Tests

Clickbox observations and Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) were used to screen for hearing loss in eeyore mice, as previously described [11]. Data were analysed using a non-paired T-test and analysis of variance. Mice were also screened for behaviour associated with a vestibular dysfunction, by observation of circling and head tossing/star-gazing behaviours.

Genetic Mapping and DNA Sequencing

Mutant eeyore mice were identified as having a severe hearing loss by the tests described above. Affected eeyore mice were outcrossed to the BALB/c mapping strain and bred to produce affected F2 offspring. Genomic DNA from tails of hearing and deaf littermates was isolated by Proteinase K digestion and phenol/chloroform extraction to use for homozygosity mapping. DNA from 20 affected eeyore mice were analysed using Sequenome MassARRAY (AGRF). The deafness locus was mapped using methods described previously [11]. Additional informative SNPs were identified using MGI [12] and affected eeyore mice were analysed using SNP-specific primers designed using Primer3 [13]. DNA was amplified with GoTaq® Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega) using the following cycling conditions; 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. PCR products were sequenced with a BigDyeTM v3.1 Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and products read using an ABI 3130×l capillary genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing chromatograms were compared to the published gDNA sequence using Mutation Surveyor (v2.60) software and the genotype of affected mice determined. Using the UCSC genome browser [14] linkage intervals were examined to identify top candidate genes within the linkage region.

Tissue Collection

Mice were anaesthetised with isoflurane and culled by cervical dislocation according to the National Health and Medical Research Council Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes (RCH AEEC approval #A585). Adult mouse cochleae were dissected and processed as described [15][17].

Ossicles were dissected from half heads of adult (14 week old) hearing and deaf eeyore littermates. Briefly, the middle ear was exposed by dissection of the bulla and removal of the tympanic membrane, taking care not to damage the malleus underneath. The malleus, incus and stapes were removed from the middle ear with care, stored in PBS and photographed with a Leica DC200 camera (Leica Microsystems Ltd).

Histology & Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Cochleae were isolated from 8, 12 and 24 week hearing and deaf eeyore mice and processed for H&E staining as described previously [18]. A standard H&E protocol was followed with a 4–5 min incubation in hematoxylin and 45 s staining in eosin then mounted with Entellan® (Merck). Images were taken on a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Pathtech).

Cochleae from 12–14 week old mice were dissected, fixed and processed for SEM as previously described [15]. Tissues were viewed using a Philips XL30 FE scanning electron microscope.


Affected eeyore mice have a severe progressive hearing loss

Auditory function in eeyore mice was measured by ABR thresholds. Affected mice showed a severe hearing loss at 4 weeks of age (85–95 dB SPL; Figure 1A). By 12 weeks of age the hearing loss has deteriorated and affected mice are profoundly deaf by 24 weeks (100–120 dB SPL). Hearing littermates show normal ABR thresholds at 4 weeks, but a slight increase was recorded by 24 weeks, which may be attributed to inherent age-related hearing loss (AHL) in the C57BL/6J strain. No circling behaviour indicative of a vestibular dysfunction was identified in deaf mice. Affected mice showed no signs of health deterioration, suggesting no other associated abnormalities in this strain. Affected founders lived to 20 months of age and all other affected mice lived beyond 6 months without any health concerns.

Figure 1. Hearing Profile (A) and middle ear bone dissections (B–C) of eeyore mice.

ABR thresholds of hearing (grey bars) and deaf (black bars) eeyore littermates at 4 (*p = 4.8×10−10) and 24 (**p = 1.2×10−10) weeks of age. The ossicles appear largely normal in deaf mice (C), comparable to normal morphology of the malleus, incus and stapes in normal hearing mice (B). M; manubrium of malleus, A; articulation surfaces of malleus and incus joint, T; tubercle, G; gonial angle, LI; attachment points of suspensory ligaments of incus, LP; lenticular process, C; capitulum of stapes, V; arched ventral crus, F; footplate. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Middle ear morphology is normal in eeyore mice

Middle ear defects can also be associated with elevated ABR thresholds. To determine whether the hearing loss in eeyore was due to a disruption in conductance through the middle ear we examined the middle ear bones. No evidence of infection was seen in deaf mice and the tympanic membrane and bulla were normal. Detailed examination of the ossicles did not highlight any structural differences of the malleus, incus or stapes in deaf mice (Figure 1C) when compared to ossicles from normal hearing littermates (Figure 1B). Normal ossicle formation indicates a sensorineural hearing loss in eeyore.

Histopathology of eeyore mice

Gross examination of cochleae from deaf eeyore mice did not highlight any visible structural changes. Closer examination of the inner ear by H&E staining revealed the structural integrity of the cochlea is compromised in deaf mice when compared to hearing controls (Figure 2). Degeneration of the inner ear is evidently progressive as the tunnel of Corti (toC) is missing in the basal level of the cochlea at 8 weeks (Figure 2F), that extends to the middle regions of deaf mice with age (arrowhead in Figure 2H, I, K and L). Although the spiral ganglion appears to show some degeneration in places (Figure 2I), the stria vascularis appears normal at all levels of the cochlea in deaf mice. Most evident in the basal cochlear region, degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons is likely to be a secondary consequence to the collapse of the organ of Corti and loss of sensory cells within the cochlea.

Figure 2. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining of cochlea sections from 8 week old hearing (A–C) and 8–24 week deaf (D–L) mice at the apical, middle and basal levels.

Normal cochlear morphology shows an intact organ of Corti and the presence of a tunnel containing inner and outer hair cells and intact spiral ganglion and stria vascularis (B). Collapse of the tunnel of Corti is evident by 8 weeks at the basal level in deaf mice (arrow in F), and degeneration of the spiral ganglion is apparent at the basal level by 12 weeks of age (asterix in I). SG, spiral ganglion; OHC, outer hair cells; IHC, inner hair cells; OC, organ of Corti; BM, basilar membrane. Scale bar: 100 μM.

Abnormal stereocilia morphology in deaf eeyore mice

Ultrastructural analysis of cochlear sensory organs from hearing and deaf mice by SEM identified morphological changes in hair cell stereocilia in deaf mice when compared to hearing mice (Figure 3). At 14 weeks of age, degeneration of outer hair cells (OHC) is observed at all levels of the cochlea, most evident at the basal turn where no OHC stereocilia are present (Figure 3J). OHC bundles at the apical and middle levels do show signs of degeneration as they have an abnormal structure, often mis-orientated and disorganised (Figure 3B and F). These bundles appear non-uniform in height and are frequently missing stereocilia. Inner hair cells (IHC) show an abnormal morphology in that they look almost OHC-like in their appearance (Figure 3D, H and L). WT IHC bundles are aligned in a relatively straight orientation, whereas affected IHC bundles look ‘U-shaped’, often with splayed stereocilia. Some IHC also appear to have two rows of stereocilia bundles per cell (Figure 3L).

Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs of cochlear sensory epithelium from 12–14 week old hearing (A, E and I) and deaf (B–D, F–H, J–L) mice at the apical, middle and basal cochlear level.

OHC bundles are disorganised and misorientated at the middle and basal levels of the cochlea. Bundles are completely missing at the basal level at this age. IHC have an abnormal morphology, appearing ‘OHC-like’ in structure. OHC, outer hair cells; IHC, inner hair cells. Scale bar: 10 μM (A, B, E, F, I and J), 2 μM (C, D, G, H, K and L).

SNP analysis reveals a novel deafness locus in eeyore

The heritability of the deafness phenotype in F2 progeny was consistent with a recessive inheritance trait, with approximately 25% of offspring affected (14/56). SNP analysis in the eeyore strain mapped the minimal causative deafness region to a locus on mouse chromosome 18 between markers rs8255001 and rs3696933 (Figure 4), based on NCBI build 37. The critical region was analysed for known genes, ESTs, predicted genes and hypothetical proteins by using the NCBI Genome Browser (URL:, the Ensembl Genome Browser (URL:, and the UCSC Genome Browser (URL: This 21.6 Mb region contains 143 genes that were analysed for likelihood of causing the deafness phenotype using the program PosMed [19], and prioritised against genes known to be responsible for NSHL. PosMed utilises the GRASE database search engine to identify and rank candidate genes [20]. The linkage region shares synteny with human chromosome regions 2:127522104–128415264, 5:110433680–112101480, 18:19337472–20895888 and 18:21850216–39101856 and no previous mutations within these regions have been identified in human non-syndromic hearing loss.

Figure 4. SNP mapping of the mutation in eeyore mice.

DNA from 3 hearing (H) and 8 of 16 deaf (D) mice were analysed for SNP markers on chromosome 18, which are listed in the first column and indicate megabase position (4.6–40.3 Mb). The mouse identification numbers and phenotypes are indicated at the top of each column. The genotype of each mouse is either homozygous for C57BL/6 (black) or BALB/c (white) or heterozygous (grey) for that marker. On the right is a diagram of mouse chromosome 18 showing the interval to which the deafness phenotype mapped to.

Discussion and Conclusions

The causative locus identified in eeyore spans 21.6 Mb of chromosome 18 and contains 143 genes, each of which may contribute to the phenotype identified in our mouse model. Candidate genes ranked by PosMed were examined to identify their known function and likelihood of causing the deafness phenotype in eeyore mice. The top-ranked candidate genes within this region are listed in Table 1.

Of particular interested are candidate genes that have previously been associated with deafness such the water-selective membrane channel Aquaporin 4 (Aqp4). Expression of this gene has been reported within the cochlear sensory cell epithelium and glial cells of the auditory nerve [21], [22], an elevated auditory brainstem threshold was recorded in an Aqp4-null mouse model [21] and a human variation in Aqp4 was recently linked to hearing loss in a cohort of patients with non-syndromic hearing loss [23].

Cadherin 2 (Cdh2 or N-cadherin), the class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PIK3C3) and Myosin 7b (Myo7b) are also plausible candidates within this linkage region as they all have family members that have been identified in deaf patients or mouse models of hearing loss. The cadherin family member, Cadherin 23 (Cdh23), is a major component of sensory hair cell tip links [24][26] and mutations in Cdh23 are responsible for the human deafness type DFNB12 [27] and Usher Syndrome Type 1D [27][29]. A number of analogous mouse models to these conditions have been reported [15], [30][35]. Several members of the phosphoinositide synthesis pathway have been reported in the literature to play an important role in hearing [36][39] and we recently identified a mouse model of progressive sensorineural hearing loss with a mutation in another member of this pathway, Synaptojanin 2 (Synj2) [11]. The myosin family member Myosin 7a (Myo7a) is well known to underlie the human deafness conditions DFNA11, DFNB2 and USH1B [40] and a number of mouse models of deafness with mutations in Myo7a have been reported [33], [41][44].

Our eeyore mice represent a novel model for studying progressive sensorineural recessively inherited hearing loss, common in the human population but with limited information on its molecular basis. Eeyore mutants are severely deaf at an early age which progresses to profound deafness within a number of weeks. Morphological and structural defects are detected within the cochlea indicating sensorineural deafness in these mice. The critical region localizes to a novel 21.6 Mb region on chromosome 18, containing a number of genes that could be implicated in the pathogenicity of this disorder. The underlying genetic mutation and mechanism remains to be elucidated, however this region has not previously been associated with recessively inherited non-syndromic deafness in humans. The rapid speed and reduced costs of targeted genome sequence analyses in mouse models of human disease, could potentially lead to the identification of the molecular mutation responsible for the hearing impairment in eeyore. The identification and subsequent characterisation of mouse models such as eeyore is fundamental to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in normal hearing, and where this goes wrong in hearing impairment. We therefore report eeyore as a novel mouse model of NSHL that will provide new insight into the genetic mechanism underlying progressive and age-related hearing loss, and contribute to the validation and development of novel therapeutics when corresponding genetic lesions are identified within the human genome.


We thank Wendy Hutchison, Melissa Arnold and Jessica Cardwell for technical assistance and advice, and acknowledge the contribution of the Australian Phenomics Facility (APF).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KM LW HD SM. Performed the experiments: KM LW. Analyzed the data: KM LW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KM LW HD. Wrote the paper: KM.


  1. 1. Bedell MA, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG (1997) Mouse models of human disease. Part I: techniques and resources for genetic analysis in mice. Genes Dev 11: 1–10.
  2. 2. Rosenthal N, Brown S (2007) The mouse ascending: perspectives for human-disease models. Nat Cell Biol 9: 993–999.
  3. 3. Ahituv N, Avraham KB (2002) Mouse models for human deafness: current tools for new fashions. Trends Mol Med 8: 447–451.
  4. 4. Avraham KB (2003) Mouse models for deafness: lessons for the human inner ear and hearing loss. Ear Hear 24: 332–341.
  5. 5. Hilgert N, Smith RJ, Van Camp G (2009) Function and expression pattern of nonsyndromic deafness genes. Curr Mol Med 9: 546–564.
  6. 6. Yueh B, Shapiro N, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG (2003) Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: scientific review. JAMA 289: 1976–1985.
  7. 7. Mohr PE, Feldman JJ, Dunbar JL, McConkey-Robbins A, Niparko JK, et al. (2000) The societal costs of severe to profound hearing loss in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16: 1120–1135.
  8. 8. Petit C (1996) Genes responsible for human hereditary deafness: symphony of a thousand. Nat Genet 14: 385–391.
  9. 9. Schrijver I (2004) Hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss: transforming silence to sound. J Mol Diagn 6: 275–284.
  10. 10. Morton NE (1991) Genetic epidemiology of hearing impairment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 630: 16–31.
  11. 11. Manji SS, Williams LH, Miller KA, Ooms LM, Bahlo M, et al. (2011) A mutation in synaptojanin 2 causes progressive hearing loss in the ENU-mutagenised mouse strain Mozart. PLoS One 6: e17607.
  12. 12. Eppig JT, Blake JA, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, et al. (2012) The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): comprehensive resource for genetics and genomics of the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D881–886.
  13. 13. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2003) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology: Humana Press. pp. 365–386.
  14. 14. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, et al. (2002) The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 12: 996–1006.
  15. 15. Manji SS, Miller KA, Williams LH, Andreasen L, Siboe M, et al. (2011) An ENU-induced mutation of Cdh23 causes congenital hearing loss, but no vestibular dysfunction, in mice. Am J Pathol 179: 903–914.
  16. 16. Manji SS, Sorensen BS, Klockars T, Lam T, Hutchison W, et al. (2006) Molecular characterization and expression of maternally expressed gene 3 (Meg3/Gtl2) RNA in the mouse inner ear. J Neurosci Res 83: 181–190.
  17. 17. Whitlon DS, Szakaly R, Greiner MA (2001) Cryoembedding and sectioning of cochleas for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 6: 159–166.
  18. 18. Manji SS, Miller KA, Williams LH, Dahl HH (2012) Identification of three novel hearing loss mouse strains with mutations in the tmc1 gene. Am J Pathol 180: 1560–1569.
  19. 19. Yoshida Y, Makita Y, Heida N, Asano S, Matsushima A, et al. (2009) PosMed (Positional Medline): prioritizing genes with an artificial neural network comprising medical documents to accelerate positional cloning. Nucleic Acids Res 37: W147–152.
  20. 20. Kobayashi N, Toyoda T (2008) Statistical search on the Semantic Web. Bioinformatics 24: 1002–1010.
  21. 21. Li J, Verkman AS (2001) Impaired hearing in mice lacking aquaporin-4 water channels. J Biol Chem 276: 31233–31237.
  22. 22. Mhatre AN, Stern RE, Li J, Lalwani AK (2002) Aquaporin 4 expression in the mammalian inner ear and its role in hearing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 297: 987–996.
  23. 23. Nicchia GP, Ficarella R, Rossi A, Giangreco I, Nicolotti O, et al. (2011) D184E mutation in aquaporin-4 gene impairs water permeability and links to deafness. Neuroscience 197: 80–88.
  24. 24. Kazmierczak P, Sakaguchi H, Tokita J, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Milligan RA, et al. (2007) Cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 interact to form tip-link filaments in sensory hair cells. Nature 449: 87–91.
  25. 25. Siemens J, Lillo C, Dumont RA, Reynolds A, Williams DS, et al. (2004) Cadherin 23 is a component of the tip link in hair-cell stereocilia. Nature 428: 950–955.
  26. 26. Sollner C, Rauch GJ, Siemens J, Geisler R, Schuster SC, et al. (2004) Mutations in cadherin 23 affect tip links in zebrafish sensory hair cells. Nature 428: 955–959.
  27. 27. Bork JM, Peters LM, Riazuddin S, Bernstein SL, Ahmed ZM, et al. (2001) Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of the novel cadherin-like gene CDH23. Am J Hum Genet 68: 26–37.
  28. 28. Bolz H, von Brederlow B, Ramirez A, Bryda EC, Kutsche K, et al. (2001) Mutation of CDH23, encoding a new member of the cadherin gene family, causes Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat Genet 27: 108–112.
  29. 29. Wayne S, Der Kaloustian VM, Schloss M, Polomeno R, Scott DA, et al. (1996) Localization of the Usher syndrome type ID gene (Ush1D) to chromosome 10. Hum Mol Genet 5: 1689–1692.
  30. 30. Di Palma F, Holme RH, Bryda EC, Belyantseva IA, Pellegrino R, et al. (2001) Mutations in Cdh23, encoding a new type of cadherin, cause stereocilia disorganization in waltzer, the mouse model for Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat Genet 27: 103–107.
  31. 31. Han F, Yu H, Tian C, Chen HE, Benedict-Alderfer C, et al. (2012) A new mouse mutant of the Cdh23 gene with early-onset hearing loss facilitates evaluation of otoprotection drugs. Pharmacogenomics J 12: 30–44.
  32. 32. Noben-Trauth K, Zheng QY, Johnson KR (2003) Association of cadherin 23 with polygenic inheritance and genetic modification of sensorineural hearing loss. Nat Genet 35: 21–23.
  33. 33. Schwander M, Lopes V, Sczaniecka A, Gibbs D, Lillo C, et al. (2009) A novel allele of myosin VIIa reveals a critical function for the C-terminal FERM domain for melanosome transport in retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Neurosci 29: 15810–15818.
  34. 34. Wada T, Wakabayashi Y, Takahashi S, Ushiki T, Kikkawa Y, et al. (2001) A point mutation in a cadherin gene, Cdh23, causes deafness in a novel mutant, Waltzer mouse niigata. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 283: 113–117.
  35. 35. Yonezawa S, Yoshizaki N, Kageyama T, Takahashi T, Sano M, et al. (2006) Fates of Cdh23/CDH23 with mutations affecting the cytoplasmic region. Hum Mutat 27: 88–97.
  36. 36. Anselmi F, Hernandez VH, Crispino G, Seydel A, Ortolano S, et al. (2008) ATP release through connexin hemichannels and gap junction transfer of second messengers propagate Ca2+ signals across the inner ear. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 18770–18775.
  37. 37. Beltramello M, Piazza V, Bukauskas FF, Pozzan T, Mammano F (2005) Impaired permeability to Ins(1,4,5)P3 in a mutant connexin underlies recessive hereditary deafness. Nat Cell Biol 7: 63–69.
  38. 38. Bruzzone R, Cohen-Salmon M (2005) Hearing the messenger: Ins(1,4,5)P3 and deafness. Nat Cell Biol 7: 14–16.
  39. 39. Zhang Y, Tang W, Ahmad S, Sipp JA, Chen P, et al. (2005) Gap junction-mediated intercellular biochemical coupling in cochlear supporting cells is required for normal cochlear functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 15201–15206.
  40. 40. Tamagawa Y, Ishikawa K, Ishikawa K, Ishida T, Kitamura K, et al. (2002) Phenotype of DFNA11: a nonsyndromic hearing loss caused by a myosin VIIA mutation. Laryngoscope 112: 292–297.
  41. 41. Gibson F, Walsh J, Mburu P, Varela A, Brown KA, et al. (1995) A type VII myosin encoded by the mouse deafness gene shaker-1. Nature 374: 62–64.
  42. 42. Mburu P, Liu XZ, Walsh J, Saw D Jr, Cope MJ, et al. (1997) Mutation analysis of the mouse myosin VIIA deafness gene. Genes Funct 1: 191–203.
  43. 43. Rhodes CR, Hertzano R, Fuchs H, Bell RE, de Angelis MH, et al. (2004) A Myo7a mutation cosegregates with stereocilia defects and low-frequency hearing impairment. Mamm Genome 15: 686–697.
  44. 44. Miller KA, Williams LH, Rose E, Kuiper M, Dahl HH, et al. (2012) Inner ear morphology is perturbed in two novel mouse models of recessive deafness. PLoS One 7: e51284.
  45. 45. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR (2005) IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 202: 473–477.
  46. 46. Jung JS, Bhat RV, Preston GM, Guggino WB, Baraban JM, et al. (1994) Molecular characterization of an aquaporin cDNA from brain: candidate osmoreceptor and regulator of water balance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 13052–13056.
  47. 47. Vanier MT, Millat G (2003) Niemann-Pick disease type C. Clin Genet. 64: 269–281.
  48. 48. Carstea ED, Morris JA, Coleman KG, Loftus SK, Zhang D, et al. (1997) Niemann-Pick C1 disease gene: homology to mediators of cholesterol homeostasis. Science 277: 228–231.
  49. 49. Saraiva MJ (2001) Transthyretin mutations in hyperthyroxinemia and amyloid diseases. Hum Mutat 17: 493–503.
  50. 50. Kanda Y, Goodman DS, Canfield RE, Morgan FJ (1974) The amino acid sequence of human plasma prealbumin. J Biol Chem 249: 6796–6805.
  51. 51. Vermeulen W, Scott RJ, Rodgers S, Muller HJ, Cole J, et al. (1994) Clinical heterogeneity within xeroderma pigmentosum associated with mutations in the DNA repair and transcription gene ERCC3. Am J Hum Genet 54: 191–200.
  52. 52. Weeda G, van Ham RC, Vermeulen W, Bootsma D, van der Eb AJ, et al. (1990) A presumed DNA helicase encoded by ERCC-3 is involved in the human repair disorders xeroderma pigmentosum and Cockayne's syndrome. Cell 62: 777–791.
  53. 53. Rothenberg ME, Spergel JM, Sherrill JD, Annaiah K, Martin LJ, et al. (2010) Common variants at 5q22 associate with pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Nat Genet 42: 289–291.
  54. 54. Reche PA, Soumelis V, Gorman DM, Clifford T, Liu M, et al. (2001) Human thymic stromal lymphopoietin preferentially stimulates myeloid cells. J Immunol 167: 336–343.
  55. 55. Amagai M, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR (1991) Autoantibodies against a novel epithelial cadherin in pemphigus vulgaris, a disease of cell adhesion. Cell 67: 869–877.
  56. 56. Lammens T, Swerts K, Derycke L, De Craemer A, De Brouwer S, et al. (2012) N-cadherin in neuroblastoma disease: expression and clinical significance. PLoS One 7: e31206.
  57. 57. Reid RA, Hemperly JJ (1990) Human N-cadherin: nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 5896.
  58. 58. Nakamura T, Itadani H, Hidaka Y, Ohta M, Tanaka K (2000) Molecular cloning and characterization of a new human histamine receptor, HH4R. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279: 615–620.
  59. 59. Oda T, Morikawa N, Saito Y, Masuho Y, Matsumoto S (2000) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel type of histamine receptor preferentially expressed in leukocytes. J Biol Chem 275: 36781–36786.
  60. 60. Volinia S, Dhand R, Vanhaesebroeck B, MacDougall LK, Stein R, et al. (1995) A human phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex related to the yeast Vps34p-Vps15p protein sorting system. EMBO J 14: 3339–3348.
  61. 61. Nakano A, Chao SC, Pulkkinen L, Murrell D, Bruckner-Tuderman L, et al. (2002) Laminin 5 mutations in junctional epidermolysis bullosa: molecular basis of Herlitz vs. non-Herlitz phenotypes. Hum Genet 110: 41–51.
  62. 62. Ryan MC, Tizard R, VanDevanter DR, Carter WG (1994) Cloning of the LamA3 gene encoding the alpha 3 chain of the adhesive ligand epiligrin. Expression in wound repair. J Biol Chem 269: 22779–22787.
  63. 63. Henn A, De La Cruz EM (2005) Vertebrate myosin VIIb is a high duty ratio motor adapted for generating and maintaining tension. J Biol Chem 280: 39665–39676.
  64. 64. Bement WM, Hasson T, Wirth JA, Cheney RE, Mooseker MS (1994) Identification and overlapping expression of multiple unconventional myosin genes in vertebrate cell types. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 11767.