Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes in Pythium and Their Role in Plant Cell Wall and Storage Polysaccharide Degradation

  • Marcelo M. Zerillo ,

    mzerillo@colostate.edu

    Affiliation Colorado State University, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

  • Bishwo N. Adhikari,

    Affiliation Michigan State University, Department of Plant Biology, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • John P. Hamilton,

    Affiliation Michigan State University, Department of Plant Biology, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • C. Robin Buell,

    Affiliation Michigan State University, Department of Plant Biology, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • C. André Lévesque,

    Affiliations Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  • Ned Tisserat

    Affiliation Colorado State University, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America

Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes in Pythium and Their Role in Plant Cell Wall and Storage Polysaccharide Degradation

  • Marcelo M. Zerillo, 
  • Bishwo N. Adhikari, 
  • John P. Hamilton, 
  • C. Robin Buell, 
  • C. André Lévesque, 
  • Ned Tisserat
PLOS
x

Abstract

Carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) are involved in the metabolism of glycoconjugates, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides and, in the case of plant pathogens, in the degradation of the host cell wall and storage compounds. We performed an in silico analysis of CAZymes predicted from the genomes of seven Pythium species (Py. aphanidermatum, Py. arrhenomanes, Py. irregulare, Py. iwayamai, Py. ultimum var. ultimum, Py. ultimum var. sporangiiferum and Py. vexans) using the “CAZymes Analysis Toolkit” and “Database for Automated Carbohydrate-active Enzyme Annotation” and compared them to previously published oomycete genomes. Growth of Pythium spp. was assessed in a minimal medium containing selected carbon sources that are usually present in plants. The in silico analyses, coupled with our in vitro growth assays, suggest that most of the predicted CAZymes are involved in the metabolism of the oomycete cell wall with starch and sucrose serving as the main carbohydrate sources for growth of these plant pathogens. The genomes of Pythium spp. also encode pectinases and cellulases that facilitate degradation of the plant cell wall and are important in hyphal penetration; however, the species examined in this study lack the requisite genes for the complete saccharification of these carbohydrates for use as a carbon source. Genes encoding for xylan, xyloglucan, (galacto)(gluco)mannan and cutin degradation were absent or infrequent in Pythium spp.. Comparative analyses of predicted CAZymes in oomycetes indicated distinct evolutionary histories. Furthermore, CAZyme gene families among Pythium spp. were not uniformly distributed in the genomes, suggesting independent gene loss events, reflective of the polyphyletic relationships among some of the species.

Introduction

Oomycetes (subphylum or class Oomycota) are part of the Stramenopiles and the supergroup Chromalveolates which likely originated from a biflagellate ancestor containing a red algal symbiont [1], [2]. It is hypothesized that the oomycetes lost their algal plastid over the course of evolution, and as a consequence, are non-photosynthetic organisms with an osmotrophic lifestyle and filamentous growth habit (mycelium), similar to true Fungi [3], [4]. However, unlike Fungi, oomycetes are diploid with cell walls composed mainly of β-1,3-D-glucans, β-1,6-D-glucans, and cellulose [5] with a small amount of chitin or chitosaccharides [6], [7], [8], [9]. Land plant parasitism has evolved independently in the Oomycota, possibly once in the Saprolegniales and at least twice in peronosporalean lineage [3]. To date, the genomes of six phytopathogenic species belonging to the peronosporalean lineage have been sequenced and annotated, including four species of the hemibiotroph Phytophthora (Ph. ramorum, Ph. sojae, Ph. infestans, and Ph. capsici) [2], [10], [11], the necrotroph Pythium ultimum var. ultimum [12] and the obligate biotroph Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis [13].

Pythium is a polyphyletic group with over 250 species that has been organized into eleven phylogenetic clades based on multi-locus gene analysis [14], [15]. However, molecular studies indicate that the genus-level taxonomy of some of the clades is questionable [14], [16], [17]. For example, species belonging to clade K fit better in the description of the new genus Phytopythium than Pythium [15], [18], [19] and further taxonomic revisions within the genus are likely to be necessary [20]. Pythium spp. are biologically diverse and occupy different niches as saprophytes and as parasites of plants, fungi and animals [21], [22], including humans [23]. Phytopathogenic Pythium species are primarily necrotrophs that cause seed, root and fruit rots in a diverse range of species [21].

One barrier to plant colonization by microorganisms is the host cell wall which is composed predominantly of polysaccharides with lesser amounts of structural glycoproteins, phenolic esters, bound minerals, and enzymes [24]. The major polysaccharides present are cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin. Hemicellulose includes xyloglucans, xylans, mannans, etc. [24]. The type of hemicellulose and the amount of pectin varies in the primary cell wall of different plants. Not surprisingly, degradation of the host cell wall is a key factor for pathogens or saprophytes invasion within plants [25], [26], [27], [28]. Moreover, some studies have associated the growth efficiency and aggressiveness of phytopathogens to their CAZyome, i.e., the repertoire of predicted genes coding for carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) which are capable of degrading plant cell walls [29], [30], [31]. CAZymes are a general group of enzymes involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates and glycoconjugates and they include glycoside hydrolases (GH), glycosyl transferases (GT), polysaccharide lyases (PL), and carbohydrate esterases (CE) [32]. Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBM) contain carbohydrate-binding activity that is not part of the catalytic site and therefore CBM are indirectly associated with carbohydrate metabolism [32], and in this manuscript in order to simplify our results and discussions, they will be referred to as CAZymes. GH, CE and PL are deployed in the catabolism of carbohydrates based on the hydrolysis of glycosidic linkages of glycosides, de-O or de-N-acylation of substituted saccharides, and cleavage of uronic acid, respectively [32]. On the other hand, the transfer of sugar moieties accomplished by GT is associated with the synthesis of oligo and polysaccharides [32]. Therefore, with the exception of GT and CBM, CAZymes have been associated with plant cell wall degradation and consequently are considered pathogenicity factors [27], [30], [33].

In the companion paper published simultaneously in this issue, we described a comparative analysis of the genomes of seven Pythium spp., Py. aphanidermatum (Pyap), Py. arrhenomanes (Pyar), Py. irregulare (Pyir), Py. iwayamai (Pyiw), Py. ultimum var. ultimum (Pyuu), Py. ultimum var. sporangiiferum (Pyus), and Py. vexans (Pyve), with other plant pathogenic oomycetes and two diatoms in order to understand key genes and mechanisms involved in plant pathogenesis and necrotrophy in Pythium spp. (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue). In this study, we detailed the genes involved in the degradation of plant cell walls and carbohydrate storage molecules. Genes encoding CAZymes are often overlooked in genome projects and faulty annotation may occur, especially due to the dual or broad substrate specificity nature of some enzymes [30], [34], [35], [36], [37] and because of the polyspecificity of some CAZyme families [32], [38]. We combined two different approaches for annotation, one uses sequence similarity (BLAST) [39] and PFAM domain-based searches (CAT) [40] and the other uses protein domain signatures examination (dbCAN) [41], both based on the Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes (CAZy) database [32], followed by manual verification of the genes. Here, we present the CAZyome of Pythium species and a broad comparative analysis with the CAZyomes of other plant pathogens belonging to the peronosporalean lineage. To corroborate our computational analyses, we measured growth of the seven Pythium species in minimal medium (MM) containing carbon sources typically present in plant cell wall and tissues. Our analysis revealed the interspecific diversity of the Pythium-CAZyomes and the comparison with the CAZyome of three Phytophthora species (Ph. ramorum (Phra), Ph. sojae (Phso), and Ph. infestans (Phin)) and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Ha) provided an indication on how CAZyme genes evolved in the peronosporalean lineage.

Results and Discussion

Phylogenetic relationships of species studied

A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis based on the 28S rRNA gene of 11 Stramenopiles resulted in a diatom and an oomycete clade (Fig. 1). In the oomycetes, Phytophthora species were arranged in a monophyletic clade, having Ha as a sister group. Pythium species were distributed in two clades: one comprising Pyve which is closely related to Phytophthora, and the other containing two subclades, one of globose sporangial species (Pyus, Pyuu, Pyiw and Pyir), and one with filamentous sporangial species (Pyar and Pyap) (Fig. 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Stramenopiles species and distribution of CAZy genes in oomycete genomes.

A Bayesian analysis was performed for 300,000 generations using a GTR/gamma distributed with invariant sites model of evolution of 28S rRNA gene. Bayesian probabilities are shown next to each branch. The distribution of seven gene families predicted from the genome of oomycete species and associated to carbohydrate degradation was compared to the phylogenetic relatedness thereof. Gene families: GH54 (orange), α-L-arabinofuranosidase; GH85 (gray), endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase; GH11 (brown) and GH10 (green), endoxylanases; GH12 (red), xyloglucan-β-1,4-D-endoglucanase; CE8 (blue), pectin methylesterase; and cutinase within CE5 (purple). Gene copy numbers are indicated next to the bars. Diatoms: Phaeodactylum, Phaeodactylum tricornutum; and Thalassiosira, Thalassiosira pseudonana. Oomycetes: Ha, Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis; Phin, Phytophthora infestans; Phso, Ph. sojae; Phra, Ph. ramorum; Pyve, Pythium vexans; Pyus, Py. ultimum var. sporangiiferum; Pyuu, Py. ultimum var. ultimum; Pyiw, Py. iwayamai; Pyir, Py. irregulare; Pyar, Py. arrhenomanes; and Pyap, Py. aphanidermatum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.g001

Annotation of the CAZyome

Based on our analysis, the CAZyome of oomycetes corresponds to a range of 271 to 395 CAZymes in Pythium spp., 582 to 653 in Phytophthora spp. and 249 in Ha (Table 1). The enzymes were classified into superfamilies with GH the most abundant, followed by GT, CE, CBM and PL (Table 1, Table S1 and Fig. S1A). In order to verify the robustness of our annotation, we compared the CAZyome prediction of five species of Pythium (Pyar, Pyir, Pyiw, Pyuu, and Pyve) with their transcriptome sequences (RNA-seq) (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue) [12]. The transcriptome of Pyuu was obtained from various conditions, including infection of plant (Arabidopsis thaliana) [12] and all the CAZyme-genes had expression support (Table S2). Expression analyses of the other species did not include plant infection (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue) and their corresponding sequences covered 77.8 to 80.5% of Pythium CAZyomes (Table S2). Despite some discrepancies due to different strategies of gene annotation, the number of enzymes that we predicted for Phytophthora spp. and Pyuu using our method were similar to the values reported previously [12], [33]. The number of CAZymes was not correlated with genome size. The Ha genome (assembly of 81.6 Mb) [13] had the lowest number of CAZymes, whereas the Pythium genomes (33.9–44.7 Mb) had, on average, half the number of CAZymes as identified in the three Phytophthora genomes (65–240 Mb) [2], [10] (Table 1, Table S1 and Fig. S1A), suggesting gene expansion of the CAZymes in Phytophthora [33] compared to Pythium spp. (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue) and Ha [13].

thumbnail
Table 1. Species of oomycetes and the corresponding carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) sorted according to the type of reaction catalyzed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.t001

CAZyme superfamilies were subsequently classified into families based on the structural features of the enzymes, according to the CAZy classification scheme [32]. A range of 82–87, 85–88 and 72 CAZyme families were annotated in the Pythium, Phytophthora, and Ha genomes, respectively (Table S1 and Fig. S1B), with most of the families shared among all oomycetes, with some exceptions (Table S1). The more abundant CAZyme families and families with more impact on plant cell wall and storage degradation are detailed below. Growth of Pythium in media containing selected carbon sources supported most of our predictions.

Degradation of plant polysaccharides

Cellulose metabolism.

Cellulose consists of a linear chain of several β-(1-4) linked D-glucose units and is one of the main constituents of oomycete and plant cell walls [24]. In Phytophthora, cellulose is also involved in appressorium formation and consequently in pathogenicity [42]. All oomycete genomes analyzed to date, including the seven Pythium species examined in this study, have one to three copies of cellulose synthase genes within the GT2 family which is associated with oomycete cell wall synthesis. However, the cellulolytic efficiency of Pythium spp., i.e. the ability to degrade cellulose from the plant, is controversial and variable among isolates of the same species [29], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51]. For this reason, Pythium spp. were once referred to as “sugar fungi” as they were believed to be unable to degrade complex structural polymers [48], [52].

Cellulases are classified into endo-β-1,4-D-glucanases, cellobiohydrolases (exocellulases), and β-1,4-glucosidases [38], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57]. Based on the CAZy database [32], eight GH families contain potential cellulases which have been annotated in eukaryotic genomes. Based on our method, three of these, GH9, GH45 and GH48, were not detected in the 11 surveyed oomycete genomes, but GH5, GH6 and GH7 which encode endocellulases and cellobiohydrolases, as well as GH1 and GH3 which encodes β-glucosidases (Table S1 and Fig. 2), were present. GH1, GH3 and GH5 were highly represented in all oomycete genomes (Table S1 and Fig. S1B), but since these families have members that are capable of degrading distinct substrates [30], [32], [34], [35], [36], [38], subsequent enzyme characterization would be necessary to determine if they indeed act on cellulose, whether GH6 and GH7 genes only encode cellulase. We determined if the predicted cellulases were directed to the oomycete cell wall metabolism (membrane-attached cellulases) or exported and likely associated with plant cell wall degradation (extracellular-directed cellulases), based on the analysis of secretion signals, transmembrane domains, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors (Fig. 2). Phytophthora spp. had, on average, more genes potentially related to cellulose metabolism than Pythium, while Ha had the lowest number (Fig. 2 and Table S1). Some of the GH families were significantly more represented in Phytophthora genomes, which may be a result of a selective expansion of those genes (Fig. 3). Based on their predicted cellular location, the majority of the genes are probably associated to the oomycete cell wall metabolism. In contrast, the number of extracellular-directed exo- and endoglucanases (GH6 and GH7) genes (2–8 copies) that are deployed in plant cellulose degradation is low in all oomycetes (Fig. 2). Some monooxygenases known to enhance the breakdown of cellulose [58], [59] were also detected in most of the genomes (Table S1), and despite not encoding glycosidases, they are traditionally classified as GH61 by the CAZy database [32].

thumbnail
Figure 2. Glycoside hydrolase (GH) families associated with cellulose metabolism.

Families GH1, GH3 and GH5 are cellulase candidates, i.e., they may or may not be related to cellulose metabolism. Genes belonging to GH6 and GH7 encode enzymes that are strictly related to cellulose metabolism, either to the oomycete cell wall (membrane attached) or to the plant cellulose catabolism (extracellular directed). Species abbreviations are as defined in Figure 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Average copy number of some CAZyme-gene families in Pythium and Phytophthora sorted by substrate.

Black line corresponds to the equal number of copies in Pythium and Phytophthora. Based on the GLM (loglinear/Poisson) test all gene families whose number of copies is significantly more abundant in Phytophthora than in Pythium are indicated: ***, ** and * represent p<0.001, p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.g003

The seven species of Pythium were incubated on MM plates containing cellulose and cellobiose (Table 2). The Pyar genome encodes the highest number of extracellular-directed GH6 and GH7 cellulases (7) of all the Pythium spp. (Figure 2) and its growth in cellobiose was high, yet limited in MM containing cellulose as the sole carbon source (Table 2). In fact, limited growth in cellulose was observed in all Pythium species. These data suggest that most of the genes encoding cellulase are associated with oomycete cell wall metabolism (Fig. 2) and that there is limited capability of Pythium to degrade cellulose (Table 2), sufficient to facilitate hyphal penetration into plant cell walls yet not enough to provide complete digestion of plant cellulose as a carbon source [12], [49]. These results are consistent with the observation that Pythium spp. preferentially colonize young root tissues such as root hairs or root tips which lack complex polymers [60], [61], [62].

thumbnail
Table 2. Proportional growth of Pythium species on a minimal medium (MM) containing various carbon sources to its growth on V8 juice agar.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.t002

Xyloglucan degradation.

Xyloglucan is the most common hemicellulose polysaccharide in the primary cell wall of non-graminaceous plants [24]. It is associated with cellulose microfibrils and therefore adds structural integrity to the cell wall [63]. Due to the nature of its backbone, endoglucanases and β-glucosidases involved in cellulose degradation are also able to degrade xyloglucan [63]. However, a set of enzymes is exclusively associated in xyloglucan degradation. For example, GH74 and GH29/GH95, which are associated with xyloglucan-β-1,4-D-endoglucanase and α-L-fucosidase activity, respectively, were not detected by us in the surveyed oomycete genomes. The absence of GH95 in Phytophthora genomes is in disagreement with Ospina-Giraldo and collaborators [33], probably due to different methods of gene prediction and annotation chosen by the two groups. In contrast, we detected xyloglucan-β-1,4-D-endoglucanase genes in family GH12 in Ha, Phytophthora spp., and Pyve and Pyar (Fig. 1 and Table S1). The occurrence of these genes in genus-specific clades (with the exception of Ha 805382) (Fig. 4) is consistent with previous reports [13], [64]. GH31 genes were annotated in Pythium spp. (4–6), Phytophthora spp. (5–9) and Ha (3) (Table S1), and based on sequence similarity with Swiss-Prot database entries, encode both α-D-xylosidases and α-glucosidase [65], [66]. Therefore, further enzyme characterization would be necessary to confirm their substrate specificity.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationship among predicted xyloglucan-β-1,4-D-endoglucanases (GH12) of oomycetes.

Bayesian analysis was performed for 300,000 generations using Blosum model of evolution. Bayesian probabilities are shown next to each branch. An endoglucanase of Aspergillus clavatus (XP_001269687) was used as outgroup. Leaves indicate the locus number of predicted proteins in the genomes of each species (as defined in Figure 1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.g004

The xyloglucan degradation capacity of Pythium spp. appears to be restricted or totally absent [12], [62]. Some of the GH12 genes present in the surveyed Phytophthora spp. genomes appear to have been lost in the other oomycetes (Fig. 1), consistent with observations reported in Baxter et al. [13]. Furthermore, the expanded number of GH12 genes in Phytophthora, probably due to duplication events as first inferred by Costanzo et al. [64], is more evident when compared to the number of copies in Pythium (Fig. 3 and 4). The difference in number may confer a greater ability of Phytophthora to proliferate in plant tissue relative to Pythium [64].

Xylan degradation.

Xylan is abundant in the primary cell wall of grasses and in the secondary cell wall of woody plants, but is a minor component of the primary cell walls of dicotyledons and non-graminaceous monocotyledons [24]. Xylan degradation depends primarily on two enzymes, endo-β-1,4-xylanase and β-1,4-D-xylosidase [63]. Xylanase activity was reported at low levels only in Py. sulcatum [29], but neither enzyme activity [29] nor genes exclusively related to xylanase degradation were reported in Py. ultimum [12]. In our studies, two families of endoxylanases were detected: GH10 in Ha, Phytophthora spp., Pyve, and Pyar; and a single copy of GH11 in Pyar and Pyap (Fig. 1 and Table S1). Pyve is closely related to Phytophthora species [18] and Pyar and Pyap are part of a separate clade of Pythium species (Fig. 1). The presence of endoxylanases in Pyar and Pyap corroborates the xylanase activity detected in Py. sulcatum [29], a species that is also part of the filamentous sporangial clade [14], [15].

Phylogenetic analysis indicated that endoxylanases from GH10 family clearly differ from GH11 (Fig. 5). GH10 was probably present in a common ancestor of Stramenopiles and underwent expansion in Phytophthora [33] (Fig. 3), but was lost in most of Pythium species and Ha. In contrast, GH11 was most likely lost in all Stramenopiles but was maintained in Pyar and Pyap, which may be a characteristic of all filamentous sporangial species of Pythium. Interestingly the GH11 gene in Pyar and Pyap is present in a 1.5 kb-contig and 48 kb-scaffold respectively that are not shared with other Stramenopile genomes.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationship among predicted endoxylanases (GH10 and GH11) of straminipilous species.

Bayesian analysis was performed for 300,000 generations using Blosum model of evolution. An endoxylanase of Phaeodactylum tricornutum (XP_002178502) and Thalassiosira pseudonana (XP_002290930) were used as outgroups. Bayesian probabilities are shown next to each branch. Leaves indicate the predicted proteins: species abbreviations (as defined in Figure 1), and locus number within the corresponding genome. All entries correspond to GH10 endoxylanases, unless represented as GH11.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.g005

Overall, the number of endoxylanase genes present in oomycete genomes was low compared to the predicted number (14) in Podospora anserina [38], an ascomycete that degrades cellulose, xylan, and lignin. Genes of GH3 family were abundant (Table S1) with some annotated as β-1,4-D-xylosidases. However, it is difficult to infer based only on in silico analysis if they are involved in xylan or in other substrate metabolism [29], [30], [34], [35], [36]. Some genes coding for xylan side chain removal or modification belonging to carbohydrate esterase families (CE1, CE2 and CE3) were automatically detected by hidden Markov models [41], while other genes were absent (e.g. GH62, GH67, and GH115) (Table S1).

CAZyome analysis indicating that Pythium species may be inefficient xylan degraders is consistent with in vitro growth studies in which most of the species had limited growth in a medium containing xylan (Table 2).

(Galacto)(gluco)mannan degradation.

Mannose-containing polysaccharides are composed of a 1,4-β-linked D-mannan backbone that may be interspersed with 1,4-β-linked D-glucose and substitutions of 1,6-α-linked D-galactosyl [63]. Galactomannans are most commonly found in the seeds of Leguminosae, and glucomannans are abundant in the secondary cell wall of woody plants whereas galactoglucomannans are generally found in both primary and secondary plant cell walls and are the principal hemicelluloses in the wood of gymnosperms [24], [63], [67]. Oomycete genomes encode few genes related to (galacto)(gluco)mannan degradation (Table S1). Based on the CAZy database, the GH2, GH5 and GH26 families comprise β-mannosidase and β-mannase among other enzymes [32]. GH26 genes were not detected in any oomycete genome and eight GH5 genes (one copy in Pyve and Ha, and two copies in Phra, Phso, and Phin) were assigned as β-mannosidases, after compared to the Swiss-Prot database. In contrast, with the exception of Ha, all genomes contained one copy of a GH2 gene coding for β-mannosidase (PTHR10066:SF12) (Table S1). No α–galactosidase gene candidates (GH27 and GH36) were detected in the oomycete genomes. Based on studies of true Fungi, the low number of genes detected in Pythium may be sufficient for mannan degradation [38], [68], [69].

None of the Pythium species grew well in a medium containing D-mannose (Table 2), but Pyir, Pyuu and Pyus did exhibit robust growth on guar gum (galactomannan). Accordingly, these species are consistently associated with seed rot and damping-off in leguminous plants that are rich in galactomannan [70], [71], [72], [73], [74]. However, we did not detect variation in the number of predicted genes in Pyir, Pyuu and Pyus (Table S1), hypothetically deployed in galactomannan degradation, relative to the other Pythium species, that would explain their growth on these carbohydrate sources.

Pectin degradation.

Pectins are complex heteropolysaccharides that are important components of the plant cell wall and middle lamella [24]. The simplest type of pectin is composed of an α-1,4-linked D-galacturonic acid backbone that can be acetylated or methylated. In other types of pectin, the backbone presents substitutions of D-xylose or is interrupted by residues of L-rhamnose, in which arabinan and galactan chains can be attached [63], [75]. Polygalacturonases break down the 1,4-glycosidic linkage of pectin and pectates and are considered to be the primary cause of tissue maceration in soft rot diseases [46]. In Ph. infestans, polygalacturonases were expressed during both pre-infection and infection stages [76] and in Ph. parasitica, expression of this enzyme was clearly linked to pathogenicity [77]. The pectin backbone is essentially disrupted by GH28 enzymes, comprised of exo- and endo- polygalacturonases and rhamnogalacturonases, and pectin lyase families 1, 3 and 4, which encode pectin/pectate lyases, pectate lyases and rhamnogalacturonan lyases, respectively. All of these families were present in the Phytophthora genomes [2], [10], [33] and most were also present in much lower numbers in Pythium spp. and Ha (Table 1, Table S1 and Fig. 6). In contrast, Phytophthora genomes encode most of the enzymes targeting different residues and side chains, whereas the other genera lack some of these genes (Table S1 and Fig. 6). Genes encoding unsaturated rhamnogalacturonyl hydrolase (GH105) and d-4,5-unsaturated β-glucuronyl hydrolase (GH88) involved in saccharification of the products of pectin and pectate lyases were not detected in any of the Pythium genomes or Ha, whereas GH105 was present in all Phytophthora species (Fig. 6). Pythium spp., unlike Phytophthora and Ha, lack pectin-methylesterase activity [29], [43], [45], [46] and accordingly genes of CE8 family were detected in Ha [13] and Phytophthora [33], but not in Pythium (Table 1, Fig. 1 and Fig. 6). Baxter et al. [13] proposed that some copies of pectin-methylesterase genes were lost in Ha and we believe that a complete gene loss occurred in a common ancestor of Pythium. In contrast, these genes probably underwent gene expansion in Phytophthora spp. Ten CAZy families involved in pectin degradation were significantly more abundant in Phytophthora spp. than in Pythium spp. (Fig. 3) which may be an indication of a biased duplication of pectin-related genes in the genomes of Phytophthora species [2], [10], [33] (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue).

thumbnail
Figure 6. Pectin degrading enzymes in oomycetes.

Bars correspond to one gene copy, unless indicated. Carbohydrate esterase (CE), pectin/pectate lyase (PL) and glycoside hydrolase (GH) gene families: CE1 = feruloyl esterase and others; PL3 = pectate lyase; PL1 = pectin/pectate lyase; GH28 = polygalacturonase; CE8 = pectin methyl esterase; CE12 = pectin acetylesterase; GH43 = endo-1,5-α-L-arabinosidase and β-xylosidase; CE13 = pectin acetylesterase; GH53 = endo-β-1,4-galactanase; GH78 = α-L-rhamnosidase; PL4 = rhamnogalacturonan lyase; GH35 = β-galactosidase; GH54 = arabinofurosidase and β-xylosidase; GH105 = unsaturated rhamnogalacturonyl hydrolase. Species abbreviations are as defined in Figure 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.g006

Pectin degradation has been reported in many Pythium species [29], [43], [45], [46], [49], [51] and our genome analysis and carbon utilization studies support this conclusion (Table 2). One exception was Pyiw, a weakly pathogenic species that is capable of growing and parasitizing plants at low temperatures. It had the lowest number of predicted pectin degrading enzymes (Table S1 and Fig. 6) and accordingly, its growth in medium containing pectin was minimal. Growth of Pythium in media containing monosaccharides commonly present in the pectin side chains or backbone substitutions (D-galactose, L-arabinose, D-xylose and L-rhamnose) was limited (Table 2), which support our hypothesis that pectin degradation is important for Pythium to gain access to plant cells [12], [49], [62], but not for the complete saccharification of this complex sugar.

Cutin degradation.

Cutin is a polymer of hydroxyl fatty acids that is especially present on cells that cover the aerial surfaces of higher plants [78]. Cutin degradation facilitates the penetration of suberized roots, leaves and stem tissues [12]. Cutinase activity was previously reported in Phytophthora species [33], [79], [80], [81], Ha [13], Pyap, and Pyar [82], but little or no activity was detected in Pyuu [29], [82]. In Ph. infestans, cutinase genes were up-regulated during host infection, but no conclusive association between pathogenicity and cutinase activity was demonstrated [83]. We identified cutinase-encoding genes (IPR000675) within the CE5 family in Ha, Phytophthora spp., and in Pyar and Pyap (Table 1, Table S1 and Fig. 1) (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue), consistent with cutinase activity reports. The cutinases present in Phytophthora spp. and Ha were clustered in a monophyletic group, contrary to the cutinases from Pythium spp. genomes (Fig. 7), reflecting the polyphyletic nature of the latter group [14], [15]. Our phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 7) confirms the gene expansion described in Phytophthora [83] and also unveils the same pattern in Pyap and Pyar. The globose sporangial Pythium species likely lost cutinase genes, while they were maintained in the filamentous-sporangial species, similar to what was observed with the GH11-endoxylanase and xyloglucan-specific-endoglucanase genes (Fig. 1).

thumbnail
Figure 7. Phylogenetic relationship among predicted cutinases of oomycete species.

The cutinase encoding genes identified from Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, Phytophthora spp. and Pythium spp. genomes were used for the phylogenetic analyses. A cutinase sequence from Frankia sp. EUN1f (ZP_06415970) was used as outgroup. The phylogeny was inferred using using Blosum model of evolution (300,000 generations) and displayed using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) web server (http://itol.embl.de/). The same color indicates cutinase from the same genus, different shades indicate different species. Species abbreviations are as defined in Figure 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.g007

Starch, sucrose and inulin degradation.

Starch is an α-1,4-linked D-glucose polymer which is the most important reserve carbohydrate in the majority of higher plants [84] and inulin, a polymer composed mainly of fructose with a terminal glucose, is alternatively used by some plants in roots and rhizomes [85]. Sucrose, a non-reducing disaccharide of an α-D-glucose and β-D-fructose, is the major form for carbon translocated from photosynthetic cells [84].

The oomycetes have a set of enzymes dedicated to starch, inulin and sucrose degradation. Genes encoding α-glucosidase (GH31) are involved in both starch and sucrose metabolism and are present in all oomycete genomes (Table S1). Genes encoding α-amilase (GH13), α-glucoamylase (GH15) and N-terminal starch-binding modules (CBM20, 21, and 25) are associated with starch metabolism and are present in most of the genomes (Table S1). β-fructosidase (GH32), which may be associated with sucrose and inulin catabolism, was represented by one copy in all Pythium genomes and by three copies in Phytophthora spp. and Ha. The number of genes involved in starch, sucrose and inulin degradation (excluding CBM) in Ha (7), Pythium (7–11), and Phytophthora (10–13) spp. (Table S1), is generally lower than in true Fungi (11–37) [38]. While Phytophthora species are more equipped with enzymes acting in the degradation of complex carbohydrates than Pythium, the majority of the genes involved in the degradation of simple sugars are uniformly distributed in all oomycetes genomes (Fig. 3). Most of Pythium species had a robust growth in starch and sucrose (Table 2), which make these plant saccharides the primary carbon source for growth.

Metabolism of other polysaccharides

Chitin and chitosan metabolism.

The number of genes related to chitin or chitosaccharides metabolism in oomycete genomes is limited, in agreement with previous reports [9], [12], [49], [62]. This is consistent with the rarity of chitin in oomycete cell walls [86] and its absence in plant cell walls. Chitinase-encoding genes within the families GH18 or GH19, chitin deacetylases (CE4), and N-acetylglucosamine 6-phosphate deacetylases (CE9) were present in low numbers in the oomycete CAZyomes, but CE9 was only detected in Pythium spp. (Table S1). One copy of GH85 which encodes endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase was annotated in all genomes, except Pyap, Pyar and Ha (Fig. 1 and Table S1). Genes belonging to families GH20 and GH48, encoding β-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminidase and chitinase, respectively, were absent. The number of genes encoding chitin synthase within GT2 ranged from one copy in Ha to 1–2 in the Pythium and Phytophthora species. No CBM18 (chitin-binding modules) was identified (Table S1). No genes exclusively associated with chitosan metabolism (GH46, GH75 and GH80) were detected. It would be interesting to compare the number of chitin-related genes in the genomes of the mycoparasitic Py. oligandrum and the flesh eating Py. insidiosum.

β-1,3 and β-1,6 glucan metabolism.

Callose, a polysaccharide composed of β-1,3-linked glucans, is only synthesized in plants during cytokinesis, pollen development, and in response to stress [87]. However, the bulk of oomycete hyphal walls are composed of β-1,3- and β-1,6-glucans [88]. Mycolaminaran, the polysaccharide form of storage in oomycetes, is also composed of β-1,3-glucan chains [89]. All genomes contain multiple copies of endo-1,3-β-glucanase and glucan 1,3-β-glucosidase within the GH16 and GH17 families (Table S1 and Fig. 3). β-1,3-glucanosyltransglycosylases (GH72) and (endo-)β-1,3-glucanases (GH81), which are associated with the modification and cross-linkage of linear β-1,3-glucans, are also abundant (Table S1 and Fig. 3). Similarly, oomycetes genomes are rich in genes encoding for 1,3-β-glucan synthase (GT48) (7–13 copies) (Table S1), consistent with the hypothesis that the majority of this class of genes is associated with the oomycete cell wall metabolism or carbohydrate storage, rather than degradation of plant β-1,3-glucan. GH30 genes can be associated with the metabolism of β-1,6-glucanases, glucosylceramidase, β-xylosidase and others [90] and this family was abundant in all oomycete genomes (Table S1), particularly in Phytophthora spp. (Fig. 3). A parallel analysis showed that some families related to β-1,3 and β-1,6 glucan metabolism were either enriched in the Pythium or Pythium-Phytophthora specific gene set or depleted in the genomes of photosynthetic Stramenopiles, when the gene arsenal of oomycetes and diatoms were compared (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue).

Conclusion

Pythium spp. are called “sugar fungi” because they degrade simple carbohydrate polymers [48], [52] and apparently only rely on them for growth. The number of genes related to starch and sucrose catabolism is considerably uniform among Pythium and other oomycete genomes. In contrast, Pythium species cannot completely metabolize the complex carbohydrate constituents of plant cell wall as an energy source. Instead, these pathogens produce pectinases, and some species cellulases, to partially macerate cell walls in order to gain access to simple sugars within plant cells. Few Pythium genes are involved in the metabolism of xyloglucan, xylan, mannose, and cutin. In fact, the variable distribution of these genes in different species of Pythium coincides with the polyphyletic nature of the genus [14], [15], [18]. Genes related to the oomycete cell wall metabolism are predominant in all CAZyomes, but differential expansion of some classes of genes was observed in the genomes of oomycetes. Compared to other oomycetes, the Pythium CAZyome did not undergo expansion as in Phytophthora [33] and some CAZy-encoding genes were lost in all or a subset of Pythium species [91], but not to the same magnitude as in Ha [13]. The CAZyome repertoire related to plant sugars degradation probably has an important influence on Pythium lifestyle as a primary plant pathogen. When infecting plants, Pythium rapidly degrades simple carbohydrates within plant cells and then allocates its metabolic resources to reproductive and survival structures (oospores) to facilitate reproduction and dissemination, rather than competing for microbial degradation of cellulose, hemicelluloses and pectin.

Materials and Methods

Isolates, DNA sequencing and gene prediction

The isolates used in this study were: Pyap (CBS 132490 = DAOM BR444), Pyar (CBS 324.62 = ATCC 12531), Pyir (CBS 250.28 = DAOM BR486), Pyiw (CBS 132417 = DAOM BR242034), Pyuu (CBS 805.95 = DAOM BR144 =  ATCC 200006), Pyus (CBS 219.65 = DAOM BR650), and Pyve (CBS 119.80 = DAOM BR484). DNA sequencing and gene prediction are described in Adhikari et al. (companion paper, PLoS One, this issue).

Sole carbon source growth experiment

Each isolate was grown in V8 juice agar medium [92] for 2–3 days. A 4-mm-diameter plug containing vigorously growing mycelium was excised and placed in the center of a Petri dish containing minimal medium [93] in 1.5% agarose or amended with a sole carbon source. The carbon sources were beechwood xylan, guar gum, soluble starch, pectin and cellulose at 1% (w/v), and D-glucose, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-mannose, D-xylose, L-arabinose, L-rhamnose, D-galacturonic acid, cellobiose and sucrose at 25 mM (Table S3). The pH was adjusted to 6.0 and the media were autoclaved at 121°C for 25 minutes. Isolates were grown in three replicates for each of the carbon source and incubated at 25°C in the dark for 5 days, with the exception of Pyiw, which was incubated at 10°C for 7 days. The diameter of mycelial growth of isolates on MM and each carbon source was measured and the proportional growth rate relative to growth on V8 juice agar (diameter growth on agar with sole carbon source/growth on V8 juice agar ×100) was determined. The experiment was repeated twice.

CAZy annotation

The whole genome shotgun projects of Pythium spp. are available in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers: AKXX00000000 for Pyap, AKXY00000000 for Pyar, AKXZ00000000 for Pyir, AKYA00000000 for Pyiw, ADOS00000000 for Pyuu, AKYB00000000 for Pyus, and AKYC00000000 for Pyve. The genome assemblies, transcript sequences, and protein sequences are also available for download and BLAST searching at Pythium Genome Database (PGD) website (http://pythium.plantbiology.msu.edu/, see download and BLAST pages) along with the annotation files in GFF3 format and the functional annotation of the gene models (http://pythium.plantbiology.msu.edu/download.shtml), which were used for CAZy annotation. The genome assembly and annotation files are also available for download from the Dryad Digital Repository (http://datadryad.org/) at this DOI (doi:10.5061/dryad.h748p). WGS and RNA-seq reads of Pythium spp. are available in the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) under the accessions SRP006957 and SRP006964, respectively. CAZy annotation of genomes other than Pythium spp. was conducted using the assembly 1 of the Ph. infestans genome released by Broad Institute (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/phytophthora_infestans/MultiHome.html), assembly 1.1 of the Ph. sojae and Ph. ramorum genomes released by the Joint Genome Institute (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Physo1_1/Physo1_1.home.html; http://genome.jgipsf.org/ramorum1/ramorum1.home.html), and assembly V8.3.2 of the H. arabidopsidis from VBI Microbial Database V6.0 [94].

The CAZymes-encoding genes of Pythium spp., Phytophthora spp. and Ha were predicted automatically using CAT [40] and dbCAN [41], which are based on the CAZy (Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme) database classification [32]. Annotation was first carried out according to the two approaches available at CAT using the standard parameters, as described (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue). Briefly, a bi-directional BlastP search of the protein-encoding ORFs from each genome [2], [10], [12], [13] was performed against the entire non-redundant sequences of the CAZy database. This was followed by annotation of the sequences using the PFAM domain database [95] and assignment of PFAM domains to the CAZy families. In this study, we also examined CAZymes using protein domains signatures search, via hidden Markov models constructed for each one of the CAZy families by dbCAN [41]. Both CAT and dbCAN results were combined and matches were considered positive when the E-value was less than 10−05. Positive hits were automatically annotated for a signal peptide using SignalP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) [96], GPI-anchor (http://gpi.unibe.ch/) [97] and transmembrane domain (http://phobius.binf.ku.dk/) [98]. InterPro families were assigned to the inferred CAZymes using InterProScan [99]. The CAZymes were categorized according to the type of reaction catalyzed: carbohydrate esterases (CE), glycoside hydrolases (GH), glycosyl transferases (GT), polysaccharide lyases (PL) and carbohydrate-binding modules (CBM), as described by Cantarel et al. [32]. The data generated by the analyses shown in Tables 1 and S1 were used in R [100] to produce box plots representing the central tendencies and distributions for each genus (Fig. S1). The values of zero were replaced by 0.1 in order to make log scale representation of the data possible. The pairwise differences between Pythium and Phytophthora (Fig. 3) were estimated with GLM in R, using loglinear/poisson model. The total number of genes per species (Adhikari, et al. companion paper, PLoS One, this issue) was used as centered covariate to normalize the data for the average number of genes. The Pythium effect was coded with dummy variables so that each coefficient represented the difference from Phytophthora for a given enzyme, providing significance value for each difference.

Phylogenetic analyses

The nucleotide sequences corresponding to the 28S rRNA gene from the surveyed oomycetes and the predicted proteins encoding xyloglucan-β-1,4-D-endoglucanases (GH12), endoxylanases (GH10/GH11) and cutinases (CE5) were subjected to phylogenetic analyses. For the 28S (Fig. 1) and endoxylanase (Fig. 5) analyses, sequences of the diatoms Thalassiosira pseudonana (XP_002290930) [101] and Phaeodactylum tricornutum (XP_002178502) [102] were used as the outgroup, while GH12-sequence of Aspergillus clavus (XP_001269687) and cutinase sequence of Frankia sp. EUN1f (ZP_06415970) were used as outgroup in Fig. 4 and Fig. 7, respectively, since these genes are not present in the diatoms genomes. Sequences were aligned by ClustalW [103] and trimmed in Mega5 [104]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the MrBayes program for Bayesian analysis [105], using the general time-reversible model with inverse-gamma rates (nucleotide) or blosum (protein) of evolution for 300,000 generations. Phylogenetic trees were drawn and formatted in Mega5 [104]. Branches with bootstrap value less than 70 were collapsed. The phylogenetic tree of cutinase genes was displayed using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) web server (http://itol.embl.de/) [106].

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Number of predicted carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) and the genome size of Pythium, Phytophthora and Hyaloperonospora. This is based on the data from Table 1 (A) and Table S1 (B). The line in the middle of the box is the median, the diamond symbol is the average, the bottom and the top of the box are the 25th and 75th percentiles and the whiskers are 1.5 times the interquartile range above and below the box limits. The dots are outliers, i.e. beyond ±2.7 standard deviations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.s001

(PDF)

Table S1.

Comparison of carbohydrate-degrading enzymes (CAZymes) encoded by Oomycota genomes using CAT and dbCAN.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.s002

(DOCX)

Table S2.

Expressed genes of Pythium CAZyome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072572.s003

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Lindsay Triplett for the assistance in the phylogenetic analysis and Jorge Ibarra Caballero for the support in bioinformatics.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MMZ CRB CAL NT. Performed the experiments: MMZ. Analyzed the data: MMZ CAL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BNA CAL. Wrote the paper: MMZ NT. Performed genome sequencing and gene prediction: BNA JPH.

References

  1. 1. Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE (2006) Phylogeny and megasystematics of phagotrophic heterokonts (kingdom Chromista). Journal of molecular evolution 62: 388–420.
  2. 2. Tyler BM, Tripathy S, Zhang X, Dehal P, Jiang RH, et al. (2006) Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science 313: 1261–1266.
  3. 3. Thines M, Kamoun S (2010) Oomycete-plant coevolution: recent advances and future prospects. Current opinion in plant biology 13: 427–433.
  4. 4. Levesque CA (2011) Fifty years of oomycetes-from consolidation to evolutionary and genomic exploration. Fungal Diversity 50: 35–46.
  5. 5. Bartnicki-Garcia S (1968) Cell wall chemistry, morphogenesis, and taxonomy of fungi. Annual review of microbiology 22: 87–108.
  6. 6. Aronson JM, Lin CC (1978) Hyphal wall chemistry of Leptomitus lacteus. Mycologia 70: 363–369.
  7. 7. Bulone V, Chanzy H, Gay L, Girard V, Fevre M (1992) Characterization of chitin and chitin synthase from the cellulosic cell-wall fungus Saprolegnia-monoica. Experimental Mycology 16: 8–21.
  8. 8. Campos-Takaki GM, Dietrich SMC, Mascarenhas Y (1982) Isolation and Characterization of Chitin from the Cell-Walls of Achlya-Radiosa. Journal of General Microbiology 128: 207–209.
  9. 9. Badreddine I, Lafitte C, Heux L, Skandalis N, Spanou Z, et al. (2008) Cell wall chitosaccharides are essential components and exposed patterns of the phytopathogenic oomycete Aphanomyces euteiches. Eukaryotic cell 7: 1980–1993.
  10. 10. Haas BJ, Kamoun S, Zody MC, Jiang RHY, Handsaker RE, et al. (2009) Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature 461: 393–398.
  11. 11. Lamour KH, Mudge J, Gobena D, Hurtado-Gonzales OP, Schmutz J, et al. (2012) Genome sequencing and mapping reveal loss of heterozygosity as a mechanism for rapid adaptation in the vegetable pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI 25: 1350–1360.
  12. 12. Lévesque CA, Brouwer H, Cano L, Hamilton JP, Holt C, et al. (2010) Genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant pathogen Pythium ultimum reveals original pathogenicity mechanisms and effector repertoire. Genome Biology 11: R73.
  13. 13. Baxter L, Tripathy S, Ishaque N, Boot N, Cabral A, et al. (2010) Signatures of Adaptation to Obligate Biotrophy in the Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis Genome. Science 330: 1549–1551.
  14. 14. Lévesque CA, De Cock AWAM (2004) Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Pythium. Mycological Research 108: 1363–1383.
  15. 15. Robideau GP, De Cock AW, Coffey MD, Voglmayr H, Brouwer H, et al. (2011) DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and internal transcribed spacer. Molecular ecology resources 11: 1002–1011.
  16. 16. Martin FN (2000) Phylogenetic relationships among some Pythium species inferred from sequence analysis of the mitochondrially encoded cytochrome oxidase II gene. Mycologia 92: 711–727.
  17. 17. Bedard JEJ, Schurko AM, De Cock A, Klassen GR (2006) Diversity and evolution of 5S rRNA gene family organization in Pythium. Mycological Research 110: 86–95.
  18. 18. Bala K, Robideau GP, Desaulniers N, de Cock AW, Levesque CA (2010) Taxonomy, DNA barcoding and phylogeny of three new species of Pythium from Canada. Persoonia 25: 22–31.
  19. 19. Abad ZGdCA, Bala K, Robideau GP, Lodhi AM, Lévesque CA (2010) Phytopythium Abad, de Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, gen. nov. Persoonia 24.
  20. 20. Schroeder KL, Martin FN, de Cock AW, Lévesque CA, Spies CFJ, et al. (2012) Molecular detection and quantification of Pythium species - evolving taxonomy, new tools and challenges. Plant Disease In press.
  21. 21. Agrios GN (2005) Plant pathology. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier Academic Press. xxiii, 922 p. p.
  22. 22. Dick M, Margulis L (1990) Handbook of protoctista : the structure, cultivation, habitats, and life histories of the eukaryotic microorganisms and their descendants exclusive of animals, plants, and fungi : a guide to the algae, ciliates, foraminifera, sporozoa, water molds, slime molds, and the other protoctists. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. xli, 914 p. p.
  23. 23. Mendoza L, Ajello L, McGinnis MR (1996) Infections caused by the Oomycetous pathogen Pythium insidiosum. Journal De Mycologie Medicale 6: 151–164.
  24. 24. Rose JKC, editor (2003) The Plant Cell Wall. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 381 p.
  25. 25. Suzuki H, Macdonald J, Syed K, Salamov A, Hori C, et al. (2012) Comparative genomics of the white-rot fungi, Phanerochaete carnosa and P. chrysosporium, to elucidate the genetic basis of the distinct wood types they colonize. BMC genomics 13: 444.
  26. 26. Coutinho PM, Andersen MR, Kolenova K, vanKuyk PA, Benoit I, et al. (2009) Post-genomic insights into the plant polysaccharide degradation potential of Aspergillus nidulans and comparison to Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B 46 Suppl 1: S161–S169.
  27. 27. Götesson A, Marshall JS, Jones DA, Hardham AR (2002) Characterization and evolutionary analysis of a large polygalacturonase gene family in the oomycete plant pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi. Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI 15: 907–921.
  28. 28. Martinez D, Challacombe J, Morgenstern I, Hibbett D, Schmoll M, et al. (2009) Genome, transcriptome, and secretome analysis of wood decay fungus Postia placenta supports unique mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 1954–1959.
  29. 29. Campion C, Massiot P, Rouxel F (1997) Aggressiveness and production of cell-wall degrading enzymes by Pythium violae, Pythium sulcatum and Pythium ultimum, responsible for cavity spot on carrots. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103: 725–735.
  30. 30. Walton JD (1994) Deconstructing the Cell-Wall. Plant Physiology 104: 1113–1118.
  31. 31. Ospina-Giraldo MD, Mullins E, Kang S (2003) Loss of function of the Fusarium oxysporum SNF1 gene reduces virulence on cabbage and Arabidopsis. Current Genetics 44: 49–57.
  32. 32. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, et al. (2009) The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Research 37: D233–D238.
  33. 33. Ospina-Giraldo MD, Griffith JG, Laird EW, Mingora C (2010) The CAZyome of Phytophthora spp.: A comprehensive analysis of the gene complement coding for carbohydrate-active enzymes in species of the genus Phytophthora. Bmc Genomics 11.
  34. 34. Henrissat B, Claeyssens M, Tomme P, Lemesle L, Mornon JP (1989) Cellulase Families Revealed by Hydrophobic Cluster-Analysis. Gene 81: 83–95.
  35. 35. Harvey AJ, Hrmova M, De Gori R, Varghese JN, Fincher GB (2000) Comparative modeling of the three-dimensional structures of family 3 glycoside hydrolases. Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 41: 257–269.
  36. 36. Lee RC, Hrmova M, Burton RA, Lahnstein J, Fincher GB (2003) Bifunctional family 3 glycoside hydrolases from barley with alpha -L-arabinofuranosidase and beta -D-xylosidase activity. Characterization, primary structures, and COOH-terminal processing. The Journal of biological chemistry 278: 5377–5387.
  37. 37. Jordan DB, Li XL (2007) Variation in relative substrate specificity of bifunctional beta-D-xylosidase/alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase by single-site mutations: roles of substrate distortion and recognition. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1774: 1192–1198.
  38. 38. Battaglia E, Benoit I, van den Brink J, Wiebenga A, Coutinho PM, et al. (2011) Carbohydrate-active enzymes from the zygomycete fungus Rhizopus oryzae: a highly specialized approach to carbohydrate degradation depicted at genome level. Bmc Genomics 12.
  39. 39. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of molecular biology 215: 403–410.
  40. 40. Park BH, Karpinets TV, Syed MH, Leuze MR, Uberbacher EC (2010) CAZymes Analysis Toolkit (CAT): web service for searching and analyzing carbohydrate-active enzymes in a newly sequenced organism using CAZy database. Glycobiology 20: 1574–1584.
  41. 41. Yin Y, Mao X, Yang J, Chen X, Mao F, et al. (2012) dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic acids research 40: W445–451.
  42. 42. Grenville-Briggs LJ, Anderson VL, Fugelstad J, Avrova AO, Bouzenzana J, et al. (2008) Cellulose synthesis in Phytophthora infestans is required for normal appressorium formation and successful infection of potato (vol 20, pg 720, 2008). Plant Cell 20: 1725–1725.
  43. 43. Winstead NN, McCombs CL (1961) Pectinolytic and cellulolytic enzyme production by Pythium aphanidermatum. Phytopathology 51: 270–&.
  44. 44. Taylor EE, Marsh PB (1963) Cellulose Decomposition by Pythium. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 9: 353–&.
  45. 45. Moore LD, Couch HB (1968) Influence of calcium nutrition on pectolytic and cellulolytic enzyme activity of extracts of highland bentgrass foliage blighted by Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology 58: 833–&.
  46. 46. Janardha Kk, Husain A (1974) Production of a Toxic Metabolite and Pectolytic Enzyme by Pythium Butleri. Mycopathologia Et Mycologia Applicata 52: 325–330.
  47. 47. Nemec S (1974) Production of Pectinases and Cellulase by Six Pythium Species Isolated from Necrotic Strawberry Roots. Mycopathologia Et Mycologia Applicata 52: 283–289.
  48. 48. Deacon JW (1979) Cellulose Decomposition by Pythium and Its Relevance to Substrate-Groups of Fungi. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 72: 469–477.
  49. 49. Cherif M, Benhamou N, Belanger RR (1991) Ultrastructural and Cytochemical Studies of Fungal Development and Host Reactions in Cucumber Plants Infected by Pythium-Ultimum. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 39: 353–375.
  50. 50. Picard K, Tirilly Y, Benhamou N (2000) Cytological effects of cellulases in the parasitism of Phytophthora parasitica by Pythium oligandrum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66: 4305–4314.
  51. 51. Campion C, Vian B, Nicole M, Rouxel F (1998) A comparative study of carrot root tissue colonization and cell wall degradation by Pythium violae and Pythium ultimum, two pathogens responsible for cavity spot. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 44: 221–230.
  52. 52. Burges A (1958) Micro-organisms in the soil. London: Hutchinson University Library. 188 p. p.
  53. 53. Herr D, Baumer F, Dellweg H (1978) Purification and Properties of an Extracellular Beta-Glucosidase from Lenzites-Trabea. European Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 5: 29–36.
  54. 54. Copa-Patino JL, Broda P (1994) A Phanerochaete-Chrysosporium Beta-D-Glucosidase/Beta-D-Xylosidase with Specificity for (1-]3)-Beta-D-Glucan Linkages. Carbohydrate Research 253: 265–275.
  55. 55. Brunner F, Wirtz W, Rose JKC, Darvill AG, Govers F, et al. (2002) A beta-glucosidase/xylosidase from the phytopathogenic oomycete, Phytophthora infestans. Phytochemistry 59: 689–696.
  56. 56. Valaskova V, Baldrian P (2006) Degradation of cellulose and hemicelluloses by the brown rot fungus Piptoporus betulinus - production of extracellular enzymes and characterization of the major cellulases. Microbiology-Sgm 152: 3613–3622.
  57. 57. Nijikken Y, Tsukada T, Igarashi K, Samejima M, Wakagi T, et al. (2007) Crystal structure of intracellular family 1 beta-glucosidase BGL1A from the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Febs Letters 581: 1514–1520.
  58. 58. Yakovlev I, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Hietala AM, Stefanczyk E, Solheim H, et al. (2012) Substrate-specific transcription of the enigmatic GH61 family of the pathogenic white-rot fungus Heterobasidion irregulare during growth on lignocellulose. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 95: 979–990.
  59. 59. Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Horn SJ, Liu Z, Zhai H, et al. (2010) An oxidative enzyme boosting the enzymatic conversion of recalcitrant polysaccharides. Science 330: 219–222.
  60. 60. Lévesque CA, Rahe JE, Eaves DM (1993) Fungal Colonization of Glyphosate-Treated Seedlings Using a New Root Plating Technique. Mycological Research 97: 299–306.
  61. 61. Gold SE, Stanghellini ME (1985) Effects of Temperature on Pythium Root-Rot of Spinach Grown under Hydroponic Conditions. Phytopathology 75: 333–337.
  62. 62. Boudjeko T, Andeme-Onzighi C, Vicre M, Balange AP, Ndoumou DO, et al. (2006) Loss of pectin is an early event during infection of cocoyam roots by Pythium myriotylum. Planta 223: 271–282.
  63. 63. de Vries RP, Visser J (2001) Aspergillus enzymes involved in degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 65: 497–+.
  64. 64. Costanzo S, Ospina-Giraldo MD, Deahl KL, Baker CJ, Jones RW (2006) Gene duplication event in family 12 glycosyl hydrolase from Phytophthora spp. Fungal Genetics and Biology 43: 707–714.
  65. 65. Okuyama M, Kaneko A, Mori H, Chiba S, Kimura A (2006) Structural elements to convert Escherichia coli alpha-xylosidase (YicI) into alpha-glucosidase. Febs Letters 580: 2707–2711.
  66. 66. Larsbrink J, Izumi A, Ibatullin FM, Nakhai A, Gilbert HJ, et al. (2011) Structural and enzymatic characterization of a glycoside hydrolase family 31 alpha-xylosidase from Cellvibrio japonicus involved in xyloglucan saccharification. The Biochemical journal 436: 567–580.
  67. 67. Willfor S, Sundberg K, Tenkanen M, Holmbom B (2008) Spruce-derived mannans - A potential raw material for hydrocolloids and novel advanced natural materials. Carbohydrate Polymers 72: 197–210.
  68. 68. Ademark P, de Vries RP, Hagglund P, Stalbrand H, Visser J (2001) Cloning and characterization of Aspergillus niger genes encoding an alpha-galactosidase and a beta-mannosidase involved in galactomannan degradation. European journal of biochemistry/FEBS 268: 2982–2990.
  69. 69. Do BC, Dang TT, Berrin JG, Haltrich D, To KA, et al. (2009) Cloning, expression in Pichia pastoris, and characterization of a thermostable GH5 mannan endo-1,4-beta-mannosidase from Aspergillus niger BK01. Microbial cell factories 8: 59.
  70. 70. Hall R (1991) Compendium of bean diseases: St. Paul.
  71. 71. Chen W, Sharma HC, Muehlbauer FJ (2011) Compendium of chickpea and lentil diseases and pests. St. Paul, Minn.: American Phytopathological Society.
  72. 72. Porter DM, Smith DH, Rodríguez-Kábana R (1984) Compendium of peanut diseases. St. Paul, Minn.: American Phytopathological Society.
  73. 73. Hartman GL, Sinclair JB, Rupe JC (1999) Compendium of soybean diseases. St. Paul, Minn.: APS Press.
  74. 74. Erwin DC, Stuteville DL (1990) Compendium of alfalfa diseases. St Paul: APS Press.
  75. 75. Harholt J, Suttangkakul A, Scheller HV (2010) Biosynthesis of Pectin. Plant Physiology 153: 384–395.
  76. 76. Torto TA, Rauser L, Kamoun S (2002) The pipg1 gene of the oomycete Phytophthora infestans encodes a fungal-like endopolygalacturonase. Current genetics 40: 385–390.
  77. 77. Wu CH, Yan HZ, Liu LF, Liou RF (2008) Functional characterization of a gene family encoding Polygalacturonases in Phytophthora parasitica. Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI 21: 480–489.
  78. 78. Riederer M, Muller C (2006) Biology of the plant cuticle. Oxford: Blackwell.
  79. 79. Mena GL, Munoz CI, Guzman PA, Bailey AM (1994) Variation in Cutinase, Esterase, and Chromosome Patterns in Nop Mutants of a Transformed Pathogenic Strain of Phytophthora-Capsici. Phytopathology 84: 502–508.
  80. 80. Munoz CI, Bailey AM (1998) A cutinase-encoding gene from Phytophthora capsici isolated by differential display RT-PCR. Current Genetics 33: 225–230.
  81. 81. Jiang RH, Tyler BM, Govers F (2006) Comparative analysis of Phytophthora genes encoding secreted proteins reveals conserved synteny and lineage-specific gene duplications and deletions. Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI 19: 1311–1321.
  82. 82. Baker CJ, Bateman DF (1978) Cutin Degradation by Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Phytopathology 68: 1577–1584.
  83. 83. Ospina-Giraldo MD, McWalters J, Seyer L (2010) Structural and functional profile of the carbohydrate esterase gene complement in Phytophthora infestans. Current genetics 56: 495–506.
  84. 84. Gupta AK, Kaur N (2000) Carbohydrate reserves in plants : synthesis and regulation. Amsterdam; Oxford: Elsevier.
  85. 85. Roberfroid MB (2005) Introducing inulin-type fructans. The British journal of nutrition 93 Suppl 1: S13–25.
  86. 86. Cherif M, Benhamou N, Belanger RR (1993) Occurrence of Cellulose and Chitin in the Hyphal Walls of Pythium-Ultimum - a Comparative-Study with Other Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 39: 213–222.
  87. 87. Zavaliev R, Ueki S, Epel BL, Citovsky V (2011) Biology of callose (beta-1,3-glucan) turnover at plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 248: 117–130.
  88. 88. Alexopoulos CJ, Mims CW, Blackwell M (1996) Introductory mycology. New York; Chichester: Wiley.
  89. 89. Erwin DC, Bartnicki-Garcia S, Tsao PH (1983) Phytophthora: its biology, taxonomy, ecology, and pathology. St. Paul, Minn.: American Phytopathological Society.
  90. 90. St John FJ, Gonzalez JM, Pozharski E (2010) Consolidation of glycosyl hydrolase family 30: A dual domain 4/7 hydrolase family consisting of two structurally distinct groups. Febs Letters 584: 4435–4441.
  91. 91. Raffaele S, Kamoun S (2012) Genome evolution in filamentous plant pathogens: why bigger can be better. Nature reviews Microbiology 10: 417–430.
  92. 92. Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK (1996) Phytophthora diseases worldwide. St. Paul, Minn.: APS Press. xii, 562 p. p.
  93. 93. de Vries RP, Burgers K, van de Vondervoort PJ, Frisvad JC, Samson RA, et al. (2004) A new black Aspergillus species, A. vadensis, is a promising host for homologous and heterologous protein production. Applied and environmental microbiology 70: 3954–3959.
  94. 94. Tripathy S, Pandey VN, Fang B, Salas F, Tyler BM (2006) VMD: a community annotation database for oomycetes and microbial genomes. Nucleic acids research 34: D379–381.
  95. 95. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, et al. (2010) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic acids research 38: D211–222.
  96. 96. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2011) SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nature methods 8: 785–786.
  97. 97. Fankhauser N, Maser P (2005) Identification of GPI anchor attachment signals by a Kohonen self-organizing map. Bioinformatics 21: 1846–1852.
  98. 98. Kall L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer EL (2005) An HMM posterior decoder for sequence feature prediction that includes homology information. Bioinformatics 21 Suppl 1: i251–257.
  99. 99. Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, et al. (2005) InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic acids research 33: W116–120.
  100. 100. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5: 16.
  101. 101. Armbrust EV, Berges JA, Bowler C, Green BR, Martinez D, et al. (2004) The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science 306: 79–86.
  102. 102. Bowler C, Allen AE, Badger JH, Grimwood J, Jabbari K, et al. (2008) The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes. Nature 456: 239–244.
  103. 103. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948.
  104. 104. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular biology and evolution 28: 2731–2739.
  105. 105. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
  106. 106. Letunic I, Bork P (2007) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23: 127–128.