Priming with Recombinant Auxotrophic BCG Expressing HIV-1 Gag, RT and Gp120 and Boosting with Recombinant MVA Induces a Robust T Cell Response in Mice

Rosamund Chapman; Helen Stutz; William Jacobs Jr; Enid Shephard; Anna-Lise Williamson

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071601

Abstract

In previous studies we have shown that a pantothenate auxotroph of Myocbacterium bovis BCG (BCGΔpanCD) expressing HIV-1 subtype C Gag induced Gag-specific immune responses in mice and Chacma baboons after prime-boost immunization in combination with matched rMVA and VLP vaccines respectively. In this study recombinant BCG (rBCG) expressing HIV-1 subtype C reverse transcriptase and a truncated envelope were constructed using both the wild type BCG Pasteur strain as a vector and the pantothenate auxotroph. Mice were primed with rBCG expressing Gag and RT and boosted with a recombinant MVA, expressing a polyprotein of Gag, RT, Tat and Nef (SAAVI MVA-C). Priming with rBCGΔpanCD expressing Gag or RT rather than the wild type rBCG expressing Gag or RT resulted in higher frequencies of total HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells and increased numbers of T cells specific to the subdominant Gag and RT epitopes. Increasing the dose of rBCG from 10⁵ cfu to 10⁷ cfu also led to an increase in the frequency of responses to subdominant HIV epitopes. A mix of the individual rBCGΔpanCD vaccines expressing either Gag, RT or the truncated Env primed the immune system for a boost with SAAVI MVA-C and generated five-fold higher numbers of HIV-specific IFN-γ-spot forming cells than mice primed with rBCGΔpanCD containing an empty vector control. Priming with the individual rBCGΔpanCD vaccines or the mix and boosting with SAAVI MVA-C also resulted in the generation of HIV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells producing IFN-γ and TNF-α and CD4⁺ cells producing IL-2. The rBCG vaccines tested in this study were able to prime the immune system for a boost with rMVA expressing matching antigens, inducing robust, HIV-specific T cell responses to both dominant and subdominant epitopes in the individual proteins when used as individual vaccines or in a mix.

Citation: Chapman R, Stutz H, Jacobs W Jr, Shephard E, Williamson A-L (2013) Priming with Recombinant Auxotrophic BCG Expressing HIV-1 Gag, RT and Gp120 and Boosting with Recombinant MVA Induces a Robust T Cell Response in Mice. PLoS ONE 8(8): e71601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071601

Editor: Mauricio Martins Rodrigues, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

Received: April 8, 2013; Accepted: July 8, 2013; Published: August 20, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Chapman et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This study was supported by the South African AIDS Vaccine Initiative (SAAVI) and National Institutes of Health (NIH USA) for funding from the Phased Innovation Awards (PIA R21/R33) in AIDS Vaccine Research; grant number 5R33AI73182-4. This work is also based upon research supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

HIV infection is a major health problem in Southern Africa and, in particular, South Africa. Even though the infection rate appears to be stabilizing with the rollout of antiretroviral drugs, there are still an estimated 5.5 million people living with HIV in South Africa (11% of total population). The prevalence is higher (17.8%) amongst 15–49 year-olds (UNAIDS) and approximately 30% of women attending ante-natal clinics in South Africa were found to be HIV positive in 2010. The most effective way to control such an epidemic would be by means of vaccination.

The first indication that vaccination against HIV acquisition is possible has come from the encouraging outcome of the RV144 trial done in Thailand which has provided evidence that an HIV vaccine can decrease the rate of HIV infection. A combination of a canary poxvirus vector (ALVAC-HIV) expressing HIV-1 subtype B protease and Gag, and a fusion of subtype E and B envelope proteins with a bivalent envelope protein boost (subtype B and E; AIDSVAX B/E), was tested in the trial. The rate of HIV infection for participants vaccinated with the HIV vaccine combination as opposed to a placebo was 60% lower one year after vaccination and 31% lower at the end of three and a half years [1].

In this trial IgG binding antibodies to the variable regions 1 and 2 of the HIV-1 envelope protein were found to inversely correlate to the rate of HIV infection, whereas binding of plasma IgA antibodies to HIV-1 envelope directly correlated to the rate of HIV infection [2]. However, 31% efficacy is not sufficient to license a vaccine and thus a vaccine regimen with better protective efficacy is required. Elite controllers of HIV-1 have been shown to maintain highly polyfunctional, broadly directed central memory T cells that secret high levels of soluble mediators [3]. Thus a vaccine that induces this type of immune response should reduce HIV viraemia and prolong the time individuals take to progress to full blown AIDS. Maximum induction of HIV-specific T cell responses has been observed using heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens where the vaccines used to prime and boost the immune system deliver matching antigens via a heterologous vector. Several studies in mice and non-human primates have indicated recombinant Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (rBCG) expressing HIV antigens can efficiently prime the immune system for a heterologous boost with recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), replication-deficient vaccinia virus (Dis), ovine atadenovirus or human adenovirus expressing HIV antigens [4]–[9].

In a previous study our group compared the use of wild type BCG Pasteur and a pantothenate auxotroph (ΔpanCD) as vaccine vectors for HIV-1 subtype C Gag. When used in a prime-boost combination with a recombinant MVA expressing a matching Gag antigen, the rBCGΔpanCD expressing Gag (rBCGpan-Gag) primed higher Gag-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses than the wild type strain and protected against a surrogate vaccinia virus challenge [5]. In a further study we found that high levels of Gag-specific, polyfunctional CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells and anti-Gag antibodies were induced in baboons primed with rBCGpan-Gag and boosted with Pr55 Gag virus-like particles [10].

Vaccine safety considerations, which are of especial importance when being used in immuno-compromised individuals, initiated the use of the pantothenate auxotroph strain of Pasteur. Replication of the BCG pantothenate auxtrophic strain in macrophages in the absence of pantothenate is very restricted and it is safer in SCID mice than the wild type strain [11]. Despite its limited replication in vivo a candidate TB vaccine, rBCG(ΔpanCD)30 prepared using the BCG pantothenate auxtroph provided protection from challenge similar to that of the wild type strain of BCG in guinea pigs [11].

Until recently BCG vaccination was thought to protect against tuberculosis disease but not against infection. However, data generated using assays that distinguish between BCG vaccination and tuberculosis infection, have shown that BCG vaccination also protects against TB infection [12], [13]. A study carried out by the Pediatric Tuberculosis Network European Trials group comparing the tuberculin skin test to interferon-gamma release assays showed that BCG vaccination may reduce the risk of latent TB infection in children by more than 50% [14]. Thus development of BCG as a combined vaccine against TB and HIV could be of great benefit in preventing infants from becoming infected with TB or HIV.

As HIV-1 subtype C accounts for approximately 90% of infections in southern Africa, a vaccine targeting this subtype is required in South Africa. There is a need for an HIV vaccine to induce immune responses to epitopes in several HIV antigens to decrease the chance of immune escape. To address this plasmids that express either HIV-1 subtype C Gag, RT or Gp120 (truncated Env) were constructed and electroporated into M. bovis BCG Pasteur and the pantothenate auxotroph. The HIV genes selected for the vaccines were derived from two primary HIV-1 subtype C isolates, Du422 (gag and rt gene) and Du151 (env gene). These viral isolates have amino acid similarity to a derived South African consensus sequence [15]. Vaccines expressing HIV proteins based on a local consensus sequence are proposed to improve vaccine effectiveness by counteracting HIV genetic variability.

These recombinant BCG vaccines were tested individually in BALB/c mice for their ability to prime the immune system for a boost with a recombinant MVA, expressing a polyprotein of Gag, RT, Tat and Nef and a truncated Env (SAAVI MVA-C) [16]. Phase 1 Clinical Trials are currently being carried out using a matching DNA prime (SAAVI DNA-C) with a SAAVI MVA-C boost [17]. The magnitude of the response to subdominant and dominant epitopes in the expressed HIV protein were greater for the vaccines prepared with the pantothenate auxotroph of BCG than those vaccines prepared with the wild type. A mix of the individual vaccines vectored by the pantothenate auxotroph vector and expressing either Gag, RT or the truncated Env (Gp120) was found to prime the immune system for a boost with SAAVI MVA-C, which induced responses to subdominant and dominant epitopes in the three HIV proteins.

Methods

Construction of recombinant BCG (rBCG) and vaccine preparation

Wild type M. bovis BCG Pasteur 1172 P2 (BCG) (supplied by the Statens Seruminstitut, Denmark) and M. bovis BCG mc²6000 (BCGΔpanCD), a pantothenic acid auxotroph strain derived from BCG Pasteur (gift from W. R. Jacobs Jr., New York, USA), were grown on Middlebrook 7H10 agar supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase and 0.5% glycerol (MB-7H10) or in Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with 10% OADC, 0.2% glycerol and 0.025% tyloxapol (MB-7H9) on rollers (4 rpm) at 37°C. Kanamycin (10 μg/ml) was included in the media for plasmid selection where required. Media was supplemented with pantothenate (48 μg/ml) and hygromycin (50 μg/ml) for the growth of BCGΔpanCD.

The HIV-1 gag, rt and env genes used in this study were derived from those reported by Burgers et al., (2006) [18]. The 3′end of each HIV gene was fused to nucleotides encoding a 10 amino acid (RGPGRAFVTI) dominant BALB/c Env CD8⁺ T cell epitope within the V3 region of the HIV-1 subtype B envelope (peptide H) [19]. This allowed evaluation of the effect of the BCG vector on immune responses to subdominant and dominant HIV epitopes. The Escherichia coli/mycobacterial shuttle vector pEM19, that was used in this study, was created from pCB119 (gift from W. R. Jacobs Jr., New York) by deleting the hsp60 promoter and lysA gene [5]. In this vector the HIV-1 gene of interest is fused to the nucleotides encoding the 19 kDa signal sequence and placed under the control of the mtrA promoter. The mtrA promoter is induced upon uptake of the rBCG by macrophages [20].

The shuttle vector pHS400 [5] contained the full length HIV-1 subtype C gag gene, codon optimised for use in BCG. However, analysis of this gene sequence revealed the existence of a number of potential internal ribosome binding sites and start codons with the potential to cause expression of out of frame nonsense proteins which would place an unnecessary metabolic burden on the mycobacterium and possibly compromise genetic stability. The gag gene was therefore re-codon optimised to remove these unfavourable sequence motifs, fused to the peptide H and cloned into the ApaI and HpaI restriction sites of plasmid pHS400 [5] generating the shuttle vector pHS501. In all subsequent codon optimisations any potential ribosome binding site-like sequences were removed.

The BCG codon optimised rt gene was cloned between the ApaI and EcoRV restriction sites of pHS501, replacing the gag gene so that it was fused to the peptide H tag to create plasmid pRC501. The gp150 and gp120 (amino acids 1–723 and 1–488 respectively of Du151 Env, GenBank AF544008.1) portions of the env gene were codon optimised for expression in BCG, fused to the peptide H tag and cloned between the ApaI and HpaI restriction sites of plasmid pHS400, creating plasmids pHS151 and pHS121 respectively.

The shuttle vectors pHS501, pRC501, pHS121, pHS151 and pCONEPI (vector which does not contain any HIV genes, Genbank accession DQ191755) were introduced into BCG and BCGΔpanCD by standard mycobacterial electroporation procedures [21]. All the rBCG vaccine stocks were prepared as described previously [5].

Assessment of in vitro and in vivo genetic stability of the rBCG

To confirm in vitro genetic stability plasmid DNA was recovered from rBCG vaccine stocks and mapped with restriction enzymes. The HIV-1 genes from two plasmids per rBCG were also sequenced. In vivo stability was determined by the recovery of rBCG colonies from spleens of mice 6 weeks after immunization. Spleens were homogenized and plated on MB-7H10 medium containing the appropriate supplements. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 3–4 weeks and the rBCG colonies were then counted. To assess the genetic integrity of the rBCG as a measure of in vivo genetic stability, plasmid DNA was isolated from at least 40 colonies and the integrity determined using restriction enzyme digestion. The HIV genes of two plasmids from each rBCG were sequenced to confirm that no mutations had occurred.

Mouse immunization

The vaccination schedule and all the procedures using female BALB/c mice (8–10 weeks old in groups of 5) were approved by the UCT Animal Ethics Committee (reference UCTAEC 07–107) and performed by a trained animal technologist. The individual rBCG vaccines or the rBCG-control vaccines were tested at doses of either 1×10⁷ cfu or 1×10⁵ cfu. A vaccine mix was prepared using 1×10⁷ cfu each of BCGΔpanCD[pHS501], (rBCGpan-Gag); BCGΔpanCD[pRC501], rBCGpan-RT; and BCGΔpanCD[pHS121] rBCGpan-gp120, then tested using a total dose of 3×10⁷ cfu. A dose of 3×10⁷ cfu of the rBCGpan-Control vaccine was used as the control for the vaccine mix. Mice were primed by intraperitoneal injection of 200 µl of the rBCG vaccine then boosted with rMVA [16] (10⁴ pfu/100 µl PBS), given on day 28 as an intramuscular injection, with 50 μl injected into the quadriceps muscles.

Preparation of splenocytes for immune assays

Spleens were harvested and pooled from 5 mice per group 12 days after the rMVA booster vaccination on day 40. A single cell suspension of splenocytes was prepared then treated with erythrocyte lysing buffer (0.15 M NH₄Cl, 10mM KHCO₃, 0.1 mM Na₂EDTA) for 1 min at room temperature before suspension in R10 culture medium (RPMI with 10% heat inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS) containing 15 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 U penicillin and 100 μg streptomycin/ml, (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA)).

IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISPOT assays

The Mouse IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISPOT sets (BD Pharmingen, The Scientific Group, Johannesburg, SA) were used as per manufacturer's instructions. Splenocytes were plated at 1×10⁵/well in a 200 μl final volume of R10 alone (to determine background response) or medium containing 4ug/ml of an individual peptide (>95% HPLC pure, Bachem AG, Bubendorf, Switzerland) with amino acid sequence matching BALB/c CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ epitopes in Gag, RT and Env. For all the vaccines, responses to the dominant CD8⁺ T cell epitope tag (peptide H) were monitored using the peptide RGPGRAFVTI. Peptides with amino acid sequences AMQMLKDTI (Gag CD8⁺ peptide), NPPIPVGRIYKRWIILGLNK (Gag CD4⁺(13) peptide), FRDYVDRFFKTLRAEQATQE (Gag CD4⁺(17) peptide), VYYDPSKDLIA (RT CD8⁺ peptide), PKVKQWPLTEVKIKALTAI (RT CD4⁺ peptide), and YGVPVWREAKTTLFCA (Env CD4⁺(6) peptide) were included in the assays to monitor responses to subdominant epitopes in the respective HIV proteins [22]–[24]. Reactions were stopped after a 22 hour incubation at 37°C in 5% CO₂, and spots were reacted with the detection antibody then developed with Nova Red as per the kit instructions. Spots were counted and analysed using an automatic ELISPOT reader (CTL technologies, Cleveland, Ohio) and Immunospot Version 3.2 software. Average spot numbers were calculated for triplicate reactions. For all experiments the coefficient of variation of the average (standard deviation (SD) of the average expressed as a percentage of the average spot numbers) was not more than 8%. Average spot numbers for responses to peptides that were twice that of average background spot numbers (absence of peptide) were considered positive. Values below this cut off were set to zero. Positive spot numbers were then adjusted to spot forming units (sfu) per 10⁶ splenocytes after background subtraction (not more than 30 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes). Cumulative IFN-γ ELISPOT responses were calculated as the sum of the responses to the individual subdominant Gag CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ peptides and dominant peptide H tag for the rBCG vaccines that expressed Gag or the sum of the responses to individual subdominant RT CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ peptides and dominant peptide H for the rBCG vaccines that expressed RT. When a mix of the individual rBCG vaccines was tested cumulative IFN-γ ELISPOT responses to Gag, RT and Env were calculated as the sum of the peptide responses to the individual CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cell epitopes in these proteins and the response to the dominant peptide H tag. All experiments were carried out on pooled spleens (n = 5) and in triplicate.

Quantification of secreted cytokines

Splenocytes at a concentration of 7.5×10⁶ per ml R10 culture medium were cultured (48 h at 37°C in 5% CO₂) in the absence of peptide (to detect background cytokine release) or with the individual peptides as used in the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay at 4 μg/ml. The cytokine content of culture supernatants was assayed using a cytokine bead array assay (BD Pharmingen, The Scientific Group, Johannesburg, SA) that detected IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10. The average of triplicate values was calculated and expressed as pg cytokine per 10⁶ splenocytes. The coefficient of variation of the average value (SD of the average expressed as a percentage of the average) was not more than 11%. Cytokine values were reported after background subtraction. For all mouse groups the average background cytokine release in the absence of peptide was not more than 3±1 pg per 10⁶ splenocytes. All experiments were carried out on pooled spleens (n = 5) and in triplicate.

MHC class I peptide pentameric complex binding

APC-conjugated H-2K^d MHC class I pentameric complexes folded with the Gag peptide, AMQMLKDTI or the RT peptide VYYDPSKDLIA and H-2D^d MHC class I pentameric complexes folded with peptide H, RGPGRAFVTI were purchased from ProImmune (Oxford, UK). Aliquots of splenocytes (5×10⁶) pooled from groups of five mice were suspended in fluorescence-associated cell-sorting (FACS) buffer [phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% FCS, and 0.02% NaN3] and labelled for 30 min at 4°C with the APC-conjugated pentameric complexes and PerCP-conjugated anti-CD8α (clone 53–6.7, eBiosciences, USA). Flow cytometric analysis was performed using a FACScalibur flow cytometer with Cell-Quest software (BD Biosciences). Pentamer-reactive cells were expressed as a percentage of gated CD8⁺ cells and presented as the average value of triplicates for a single experiment [25]. The coefficient of variation of the average value (SD of the average expressed as a percentage of the average) was less than 0.01%.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean and standard deviation of the mean of the indicated number of experiments. Data was statistically analysed using Student's t test and p values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Selection of genetically stable rBCG vaccines

In vivo and in vitro instability of recombinant BCG, especially those utilizing episomal vectors, is sometimes a problem. BCG[pHS501] (rBCG-Gag), BCGΔpanCD[pHS501] (rBCGpan-Gag), BCG[pRC501] (rBCG-RT) and BCGΔpanCD[pRC501] (rBCGpan-RT) were all found to be stable in vitro. However, no stable recombinants expressing the HIV-1 gp150 gene could be obtained in either strain of BCG. In vitro stable recombinants of both strains of BCG expressing the truncated HIV-1 gp120 gene were obtained (rBCG-gp120 and rBCGpan-gp120).

To assess in vivo stability rBCG-Gag, rBCGpan-Gag, rBCG-RT, rBCGpan-RT, rBCG-gp120, rBCGpan-gp120, rBCG-Control and rBCGpan-Control were isolated from the spleens of mice 6 weeks post vaccination and plated on MB-7H10 containing the appropriate supplements but lacking kanamycin. Plasmid DNA was isolated from at least 40 colonies for each recombinant and mapped with restriction enzymes. In addition the HIV genes were sequenced from 2 plasmids of each of the rBCG. All these recombinant BCG found to be stable in vitro remained stable in vivo (Figure 1).

Download:

Figure 1. Schematic map and restriction enzyme digests of pHS501, pRC501 and pHS121 plasmid DNA isolated from rBCG.

(A) Schematic map of E. coli/mycobacterial shuttle vector. (B) Lanes 1 & 8 contain the molecular weight marker GeneRuler^TM 1 kb Ladder (Fermentas, S.A.). Lanes 2 & 3 contain pHS501 plasmid DNA. Lanes 4 & 5 contain pRC501 plasmid DNA. Lanes 6 & 7 contain pHS121 plasmid DNA. Lanes 2, 4 & 6 contain plasmid DNA isolated prior to transformation into BCG (positive controls). Lanes 3, 5 & 7 contain plasmid DNA isolated from rBCG. Plasmid DNA in lanes 2 to 7 was digested with restriction enzymes XbaI and HpaI. Results were the same for rBCG and rBCGΔpanCD. Enzymatic restriction analysis of only 2 representative samples are shown for each rBCG, however plasmid DNA was isolated from a minimum of 20 of each rBCG.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071601.g001

Use of a pantothenate auxotroph of BCG improves the priming ability of the rBCG vaccine

The influence of BCG or BCGΔpanCD vectors as well as rBCG dose on immune responses to the HIV insert was evaluated by priming mice with doses of 10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu of rBCG-Gag, rBCGpan-Gag, rBCG-RT, rBCGpan-RT or the respective rBCG-Control or rBCGpan-Control vaccine followed by a rMVA (10⁴ pfu) boost on day 28. Responses to subdominant Gag and RT CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cell epitopes and the dominant peptide H CD8⁺ T cell epitope tag were assayed on day 40 using the respective peptides in an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (Figure 2 and Figure 3). In this study the dominant (as opposed to a subdominant) epitope response was considered to be one that provoked the most intense immune response.

Download:

Figure 2. Influence of vector on IFN-γ ELISPOT responses to a rBCG-Gag or rBCGpan-Gag prime and rMVA boost.

Groups of mice were primed with the indicated rBCG vaccines (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) and then boosted with rMVA (10⁴ pfu) on day 28. One group of mice was left unvaccinated then vaccinated on day 28 with rMVA. On day 40 spleens were harvested and splenocytes pooled from 5 mice per group. (A) IFN-γ ELISPOT assays with Gag CD8⁺ T cells and CD4⁺ T cell peptides or peptide H CD8⁺ T cell peptide. Bars are the average and standard deviation of the average IFN-γ ELISPOT responses for the indicated individual peptides for 3 separate experiments. Asterisks indicate statistical significance of the mean IFN-γ ELISPOT responses for the individual peptides for a rBCG-Gag or rBCGpan-Gag vaccine prime and rMVA boost compared to that for the respective rBCG-Control or rBCGpan-Control vaccine prime and rMVA boost. (B) Splenocytes were stained with H-2K^d and H-2D^d MHC class I pentamers folded with the Gag CD8⁺ T cell peptide or peptide H CD8⁺ T cell peptide and flow cytometry was used to determine the frequency of Gag- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells in the splenocyte population. Bars are the average of triplicate values for Gag- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells expressed as a percentage of the total gated CD8⁺ T cell population for a single experiment. The coefficient of variation of all average values (standard deviation of the average expressed as a percentage of the average) was less than 0.01%. Asterisks indicate the statistical significance of the mean values for the percentage of Gag- or peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells for a rBCG-Gag or rBCGpan-Gag vaccine prime and rMVA boost compared to that for the respective rBCG-Control or BCGpan-Control vaccine prime and rMVA boost. Respective differences for peptide responses between groups are also indicated. *<0.01; **<0.05; Student's t-test for means of unpaired data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071601.g002

Download:

Figure 3. Influence of vector on IFN-γ ELISPOT responses to a rBCG-RT or rBCGpan-RT prime and rMVA boost.

Groups of mice were primed with the indicated rBCG vaccines (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) then boosted with rMVA (10⁴ pfu) on day 28. One group of mice was left unvaccinated then vaccinated on day 28 with rMVA. On day 40 spleens were harvested and splenocytes pooled from 5 mice per group. (A) IFN-γ ELISPOT assays with RT CD8⁺ T cell and CD4⁺ T cell peptides or peptide H CD8⁺ T cell peptide. Bars are the average and standard deviation of the average IFN-γ ELISPOT responses for the indicated individual peptides for 3 separate experiments. Asterisks indicate statistical significance of the mean IFN-γ ELISPOT responses for the individual peptides for a rBCG-RT or rBCGpan-RT vaccine prime and rMVA boost compared to that for the respective BCG- Control or rBCGpan-Control vaccine prime and rMVA boost. (B) Splenocytes were stained with H-2K^d and H-2D^d MHC class I pentamers folded with the RT CD8⁺ T cell peptide or peptide H CD8⁺ T cell peptide and flow cytometry was used to determine the frequency of RT- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells in the splenocyte population. Bars are the average of triplicate values for RT- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells expressed as a percentage of the total gated CD8⁺ T cell population for a single experiment. The coefficient of variation of all average values (standard deviation of the average expressed as a percentage of the average) was less than 0.01%. Asterisks indicate the statistical significance of the mean values for the percentage of CD8⁺ RT- or peptide H-specific T cells for a rBCG-RT or rBCGpan-RT vaccine prime and rMVA boost compared to that for the respective rBCG-Control or rBCGpan-Control vaccine prime and rMVA boost. Respective differences for peptide responses between groups are also indicated. *<0.01; **<0.05; Student's t-test for means of unpaired data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071601.g003

Responses to Gag and RT CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cell peptides and the peptide H CD8⁺ T cell peptide for a rMVA vaccination alone were similar to that for a rBCG-Control or rBCGpan-Control prime (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) and rMVA boost. Thus the vectors had no adjuvant activity (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) or damping on HIV peptide responses (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

Similar peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell IFN-γ ELISPOT responses of 978 to1220 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes, that were 3-fold above control values (p<0.01), were observed in response to priming with either rBCG-Gag or rBCGpan-Gag (10⁷ cfu and 10⁵ cfu) (Figure 2A). Cumulative Gag-specific CD8⁺ T cell and CD4⁺ T cell IFN-γ ELISPOT responses, 3–4 fold above that of control values (p<0.05), of 324 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes and 516 to 701 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes, was achieved by priming with either rBCG-Gag (10⁷ cfu) or rBCGpan-Gag (10⁵ cfu and 10⁷ cfu) respectively. The cumulative Gag-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT responses induced by rBCGpan-Gag, although not influenced by dose, were significantly greater (p<0.05) from that induced by a prime with rBCG-Gag (10⁷ cfu) (Figure 2A). Subdominant Gag-specific responses contributed 24% or 35% to the total IFN-γ ELISPOT response for a rBCG-Gag (10⁷ cfu) prime or rBCGpan-Gag (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) prime respectively (Figure 2A). Thus using BCGΔpanCD rather than BCG as the vector allows the induction of higher responses to subdominant Gag epitopes with the dose having minimal influence on the magnitude of the response to the Gag insert.

A single experiment was performed using H-2K^d and H-2D^d MHC class I pentamers folded with the Gag CD8⁺ T cell peptide or the peptide H CD8⁺ T cell peptide respectively to directly enumerate Gag- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells as a percentage of total gated CD8⁺ T cells (Figure 2B). Cumulative frequencies of Gag- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells of not more than 1.3% of the total CD8⁺ T cell population was induced by a rBCG-Control prime or rBCGpan-Control prime (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) and rMVA boost which was not different from a rMVA vaccination alone (Figure 2B).

A rBCGpan-Gag (10⁷ cfu and 10⁵ cfu) prime induced more peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells than the respective rBCG-Gag prime (p<0.01). In addition, priming with rBCGpan-Gag resulted in higher cumulative frequencies of Gag- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells (9.4% and 13.1% of the total CD8⁺ T cells for a dose of 10⁷ cfu and 10⁵ cfu respectively) than rBCG-Gag (3% and 4.7% for a dose of 10⁷ cfu and 10⁵ cfu respectively). Priming with 10⁵ cfu of rBCG-Gag or rBCGpan-Gag induced significantly (p<0.01) higher peptide H-specific CD8+ T cells than doses of 10⁷ cfu (Figure 2B). Subdominant Gag-specific CD8⁺ T cells were only observed with a rBCGpan-Gag prime, these CD8+ T cells contributed 7.2% (10⁷ cfu) and 4.3% (10⁵ cfu) to the respective cumulative frequencies (Figure 2B).

The choice of vector for expression of RT did not influence RT- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell IFN-γ ELISPOT responses. Peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell IFN-γ ELISPOT magnitudes of 629 to 1000 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes, that were 3-fold above control values (p<0.01 or p<0.05), and RT-specific CD8⁺ T cell magnitudes of 530 to 730 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes that were 5-fold above control values (p<0.01), were observed after priming with either rBCG-RT or rBCGpan-RT (10⁷ cfu and 10⁵ cfu) (Figure 3A). No RT-specific CD4⁺ T cell peptide responses above control values were induced by a rBCG-RT prime. In contrast, priming with rBCGpan-RT (10⁷ cfu and 10⁵ cfu) induced similar RT CD4⁺ T cell IFN-γ ELISPOT responses of 235 to 240 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes that were 2-fold above control values (p<0.05). Thus the advantage of priming with BCGpan-RT as opposed to rBCG-RT prior to the rMVA boost is the induction of subdominant RT CD4⁺ T cell peptide responses.

A further single experiment using H-2K^d and H-2D^d MHC class I pentamers folded with the RT CD8⁺ T cell peptide or the peptide H CD8⁺ T cell peptide respectively was performed to directly enumerate RT CD8⁺ T cell and peptide H CD8⁺ T cell frequencies as a percentage of total gated CD8⁺ T cells (Figure 3B). Cumulative RT- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell frequencies induced by either a rBCG-Control or rBCGpan-Control prime (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) and rMVA boost or rMVA vaccination alone were not significantly different and were not more than 1.3% of the total CD8⁺ T cell population (Figure 3B). The choice of vector (either BCG or BCGΔpanCD) for RT did not influence the frequency of peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells. However RT-specific CD8⁺ T cell frequencies induced by priming with rBCGpan-RT prime were significantly higher (p<0.01) than for a respective rBCG-RT prime. Cumulative RT- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell frequencies reached approximately 3.3% of the total CD8⁺ cells for a rBCG-RT (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) prime with 23% of the response from responding RT-specific CD8⁺ T cells (Figure 3B). In contrast for a rBCGpan-RT (10⁷ cfu or 10⁵ cfu) prime cumulative RT- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell frequencies reached approximately 5.0% of total CD8⁺ T cells with 40% of the response being from RT-specific CD8⁺ T cells (Figure 3B). Thus using BCGΔpanCD as a vector rather than BCG for RT expression is advantageous in influencing the level of subdominant RT-specific CD8⁺ T cell frequencies. The priming dose did not significantly influence the magnitude of the response (Figure 3B).

Immune responses to HIV-1 Gag, RT and Env can be achieved when a mixture of the rBCGΔpanCD vaccines are used

The need for an HIV vaccine to induce responses to several HIV antigens led us to investigate induction of immune responses in mice to a prime with a mix of rBCG vaccines each expressing Gag, RT or Gp120. The BCGΔpanCD vector rather than the wild type BCG vector was used for these studies as we found it primed responses to subdominant HIV epitopes (see previous section).

A dose of 10⁷ cfu of each individual vaccine was mixed to provide a vaccine mix with a dose of 3×10⁷ cfu in the injection volume. Mice were primed with this dose of vaccine mix then boosted with rMVA (10⁴ pfu) on day 28. The experiment also included a prime with each of the individual vaccines (10⁷ cfu) and rMVA boost on day 28 for comparison purposes. Priming with the rBCGpan-Control (10⁷ cfu or 3×10⁷ cfu) followed by a rMVA (10⁴ pfu) boost on day 28 was used as a control. Splenocytes were collected on day 40 and used in IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISPOT assays with peptide H, the CD8⁺ T cell epitope tag on each HIV protein, and peptides to CD8⁺ T and CD4⁺ T cell epitopes in Gag, RT and Gp120 to determine the immune response. The results shown are from three separate experiments.

Cumulative IFN-γ (503±15 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes) and IL-2 ELISPOT (108±18 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes) peptide responses for a rBCGpan-Control (3×10⁷ cfu) prime and rMVA boost were not significantly different from cumulative IFN-γ (597±35 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes) and IL-2 (98±19 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes) ELISPOT responses for a rMVA vaccination alone. Thus using a dose of 3×10⁷ cfu did not induce any adverse effect on HIV peptide responses in the ELISPOT assays.

The vaccine mix did prime the immune system for a rMVA boost (Figure 4A and B). Cumulative responses to Gag-, RT- and peptide H-specific CD8⁺ and Gag-, RT- and Env-specific CD4⁺ T cell peptides in the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay reached 1798±52 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes, approximately 3.5-fold (p<0.01) above that for responses to these peptides induced by the BCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost (Figure 4A). Subdominant Gag- and RT-specific CD8⁺ T cell and Gag-, RT- and Env-specific CD4⁺ T cell responses contributed 66% to the cumulative response for a prime with the vaccine mix. Cumulative magnitudes of the IFN-γ ELISPOT peptide responses induced by the vaccine mix did not reach the sum of responses induced by the individual vaccines (Figure 4A). Priming with the individual rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT or rBCGpan-gp120 vaccines induced cumulative IFN-γ ELISPOT CD8⁺ T cell and CD4⁺ T cell peptide responses of 1431±151 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes; 2109±185 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes; and 1173±94 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes respectively. These responses are between 3.5 and 5.2 fold (p<0.01) above that for a rBCGpan-Control prime (Figure 4A). Subdominant responses contributed 38%, 55% and 20% to the cumulative IFN-γ ELISPOT CD8⁺ T cell and CD4⁺ T cell peptide responses for the respective individual rBCGpan vaccine prime and rMVA boost. Thus it appears that the proportion of subdominant peptide-specific responses to the cumulative IFN-γ ELISPOT response can be increased from an average of 37±17% for an individual vaccine prime to 66% when a vaccine mix is used as the prime.

Download:

Figure 4. IFN-γ ELISPOT responses induced by a prime with the individual rBCG-HIV vaccines or a mix of the rBCG-HIV vaccines and rMVA boost.

Groups of mice were primed with either the individual rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT or rBCGpan-gp120 vaccines (10⁷ cfu) or a rBCG vaccine mix (3×10⁷ cfu) prepared by mixing 10⁷ cfu of the individual rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT and rBCGpan-gp120 vaccines. Groups of mice vaccinated with the rBCGpan-Control vaccine (10⁷ cfu to act as control for the individual vaccine vaccinations or 3×10⁷ cfu to act as control for the mix of the individual vaccine vaccinations) served as controls. All groups of mice were then boosted with MVA (10⁴ pfu) on day 28. On day 40 spleens were harvested and splenocytes pooled from 5 mice per group were used in an IFN-γ ELISPOT (A) or IL-2 ELISPOT (B) assay with Gag, RT, Env and peptide H CD8⁺ T cell and CD4⁺ T cell peptides. Bars are the average and standard deviation of the average IFN-γ ELISPOT (A) or IL-2 ELISPOT responses for the indicated individual peptides for 3 separate experiments. Statistical significance (Student's t-test for means of unpaired data) of the mean IFN-γ ELISPOT or IL-2 ELISPOT responses for the individual peptides compared to that for the control is indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071601.g004

IL-2 ELISPOT assays indicated only HIV-specific CD4⁺ T cells produced IL-2 in response to a prime with either the vaccine mix or the individual vaccines (Figure 4B). Cumulative IL-2 ELISPOT responses to Gag, RT and Env CD4⁺ T cell peptides in response to a vaccine mix prime reached 356 sfu/10⁶ splenocytes which was 3-fold (p<0.05) above that for responses to these peptides induced by priming with the rBCGpan-Control. These frequencies of HIV-specific IL-2 producing cells were similar to that induced by a prime with the individual vaccines (Figure 4B).

Th1 cytokine production

The Th1/Th2 bias of the immune response to a prime with the individual vaccines (10⁷ cfu) or a mix of the individual vaccines rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT and rBCGpan-gp120 (3×10⁷ cfu) and rMVA boost was investigated (Figure 5). rBCGpan-Control (10⁷ or 3×10⁷ cfu) was used as the control vaccine prime. Th1 and Th2 cytokines were quantified in the supernatant collected from splenocytes cultured with Gag, RT and peptide H CD8⁺ T cell peptides and Gag, RT and Env CD4⁺ T cell peptides. No IL-10 or IL-4 could be detected in the supernatants for a prime with the vaccine mix and rMVA boost as well as a prime with the individual vaccines and rMVA boost.

Download:

Figure 5. Th1 cytokines induced by a prime with the individual rBCG-HIV vaccines or a mix of the rBCG-HIV vaccines and rMVA boost.

Groups of mice were primed with either the individual rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT or rBCGpan-gp120 vaccines (10⁷ cfu) or a rBCG vaccine mix (3×10⁷ cfu) prepared by mixing 10⁷ cfu of the individual vaccines rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT and rBCGpan-gp120. Groups of mice vaccinated with the BCGpan-Control vaccine (10⁷ cfu to act as control for the individual vaccine vaccinations or 3×10⁷ cfu to act as control for the mix of the individual vaccine vaccinations) served as controls. All groups of mice were then boosted with rMVA (10⁴ pfu) on day 28. On day 40 spleens were harvested and splenocytes pooled from 5 mice per group were stimulated with Gag, RT, Env and peptide H CD8⁺ T cell and CD4⁺ T cell peptides. Culture supernatants collected at 48 h were analyzed for IFN-γ (A), TNF-α (B) and IL-2 (C) using a cytokine bead array assay and flow cytometric analysis. Data was expressed as pg cytokine/10⁶ splenocytes. Bars are the average and standard deviation of the average cytokine released into the supernatant during stimulation with the indicated individual peptide for 3 separate experiments. Statistical significance (Student's t-test for means of unpaired data) of the mean cytokine response for the individual peptides compared to that for the control is indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071601.g005

A prime with the vaccine mix and rMVA boost induced peptide-specific IFN-γ and TNF-α in the culture supernatants in response to stimulation with Gag, RT and peptide H CD8⁺ T cell and Gag, RT and Env CD4⁺ T cell peptides. These individual peptide-specific IFN-γ and TNF-α levels were significantly different (p<0.01 or p<0.05) from the rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5). Cumulative HIV peptide-specific IFN-γ levels of 3269±198 pg/10⁶ splenocytes and TNF-α of 655±150 pg/10⁶ splenocytes were measured for a vaccine mix prime and rMVA boost which were 5 fold (p<0.01) and 3 fold (p<0.05) higher respectively than for a rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5A and B). These IFN-γ and TNF-α levels, for a rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost, were not significantly different from a rMVA vaccination alone. For a vaccine mix prime and rMVA boost 48% of the total IFN-γ was produced by subdominant peptide-specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells. The total TNF-α production was comprised of 85% from subdominant peptide-specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells. The cumulative magnitudes of CD8⁺ T cell and CD4⁺ T cell peptide-specific IFN-γ and TNF-α for a vaccine mix prime and rMVA boost were lower than the sum of these responses for a prime with the individual vaccines and rMVA boost (Figure 5A and B). A prime with the individual rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT or rBCGpan-gp120 vaccines and rMVA boost induced cumulative HIV-peptide specific IFN-γ magnitudes of 3182±102 pg/10⁶ splenocytes, 2745±120 pg/10⁶ splenocytes and 2713±110 pg/10⁶ splenocytes that were 4.5 to 8 fold (p<0.01) higher respectively than a rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5A). Subdominant peptide-specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells contributed 21%, 43% and 18% to the total IFN-γ production for the respective individual rBCGpan vaccine prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5A).

Cumulative peptide-specific TNF-α levels of 333±28 pg/10⁶ splenocytes, 440±32 pg/10⁶ splenocytes and 315±15 pg/10⁶ splenocytes induced by a prime with the individual rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT or rBCGpan-gp120 vaccines and rMVA boost, were at least 3 fold (p<0.01) greater than those from a rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5B). Subdominant peptide-specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells contributed 40%, 57% and 40% to the total TNF-α production for the respective individual rBCGpan vaccine prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5B).

Thus it appears that when compared to a prime with the individual vaccines, a vaccine mix prime and rMVA boost induces increased subdominant peptide-specific IFN-γ and TNF-α production. The proportion of subdominant peptide-specific IFN-γ to the total peptide-specific IFN-γ response increased from an average of 27±13% for an individual vaccine prime to 48% using a vaccine mix as the prime. The contribution of subdominant peptide-specific TNF-α to the total peptide-specific TNF-α response increased from an average of 45±9% induced by an individual vaccine prime to 85% using a vaccine mix as the prime.

No IL-2 production by peptide-specific CD8⁺ T cells could be detected for any of the vaccine regimens. A prime with the vaccine mix and rMVA boost induced peptide-specific IL-2 levels in the culture supernatants in response to stimulation with Gag, RT and Env CD4⁺ T cell peptides which were significantly different (p<0.01,) from the individual peptide-specific IL-2 levels in the culture supernatants from the rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5C). Cumulative HIV CD4⁺ T cell peptide-specific IL-2 levels of 695±22 pg/10⁶ splenocytes were measured for a prime with the vaccine mix and rMVA boost, which were four fold higher (p<0.01) than those produced by a rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5C). The levels of HIV peptide-specific IL-2 induced by rMVA vaccination were not significantly different to that of a rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost. The cumulative magnitudes of CD4⁺ T cell peptide-specific IL-2 for a vaccine mix prime and rMVA boost were lower than the sum of these responses for a prime with the individual vaccine and rMVA boost (Figure 5C). A prime with the individual rBCGpan-Gag, rBCGpan-RT or rBCGpan-gp120 vaccines and rMVA boost induced cumulative CD4⁺ T cell peptide-specific IL-2 levels of 496±32 pg/10⁶ splenocytes, 328±48 pg/10⁶ splenocytes and 230±30 pg/10⁶ splenocytes that were 3 fold higher (p<0.05) than for a rBCGpan-Control prime and rMVA boost (Figure 5C).

Discussion

Studies evaluating CD8⁺ T cell priming by rBCG indicate highly functional memory T cells which are able to proliferate and produce cytokines are generated to foreign expressed proteins [26]–[29]. Several factors appear to participate in this differentiation to antigen specific cells with a memory phenotype. Slow BCG replication rates within phagosomes and limited levels of antigen expression that peaks in the second weak after infection are factors that participate in this process [5], [30]. A previous study of ours showed that a rBCGpan-Gag prime and Gag VLPs boost vaccine regimen is highly immunogenic and induces a broad and polyfunctional central memory T cell response in baboons [10]. Other studies by Hanke et al. have also demonstrated rBCG effectively primes the immune system for a rMVA boost to elicit HIV-specific T cells [6]–[8], [31]. Thus in this study a rBCG vaccine prime and rMVA vaccine boost regimen was chosen to investigate maximum immune responses to rBCG vaccines expressing various HIV proteins. The rMVA chosen for the study, SAAVI MVA-C, which is in phase I clinical trials [17], expresses proteins identical to that expressed by the individual rBCG vaccines tested in this study.

Analysis of genetic stability is an important aspect of characterization of candidate vaccines. In this study we were able to generate genetically stable (in vivo and in vitro) rBCG and rBCGΔpanCD expressing Gag, RT or a truncated Env (Gp120). No stable recombinants expressing the HIV-1 gp150 gene could be obtained. Instability of rBCG expressing HIV or SIV antigens has been reported by a number of different groups. Cayabyab et al. [4] reported that they were unable to obtain any rBCG expressing SIV Gp160 and rBCG expressing SIV Gp120 were unstable. Two other groups also found that rBCG expressing truncated env genes utilising the strong hsp60 promoter were unstable, whereas one of the groups could obtain stable rBCG expressing Gp120 when they used the weaker α-antigen promoter for expression [32], [33]. As suggested in a previous paper, in which we were able to improve the stability of rBCG expressing HIV-1 Gag [5], the genetic stability of our vaccines could be due to two factors: (i) the use of the mtrA promoter which expresses weakly in vitro but is strongly up-regulated after uptake by phagocytosing cells and (ii) the fusion of the HIV antigen to the 19kDa leader sequence which transports the protein to the surface of the mycobacteria, thus removing a possibly toxic antigen from the mycobacterial cell.

Experiments using two different assays, the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay and enumeration of pentameric MHC class I-peptide-specific reactive CD8⁺ T cells, were performed to evaluate the influence of the vector, BCG or BCGΔpanCD, on immune responses to expressed Gag and RT. An overall conclusion from the data obtained from the two different assays is that using BCGΔpanCD rather than BCG as a vector is beneficial for the induction of higher frequencies of total HIV-specific T cells and increased numbers of T cells specific to the subdominant Gag and RT epitopes. An interesting observation using the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay is that the magnitude of peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses (when attached to the Gag or RT protein) were not affected by the choice of vector. In contrast using the direct enumeration method, the magnitude of peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell frequencies (when attached to the Gag protein), were significantly higher with BCGΔpanCD as the vector with the lower BCGpan-Gag vaccine dose eliciting higher peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells frequencies than the higher dose. Although this was not seen for the frequencies of peptide H attached to the RT protein frequencies of RT CD8⁺ T cells when directly enumerated were significantly higher when RT was expressed by BCGΔpanCD rather than BCG. This was not detectable using the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. An underlying difference between the assays is that the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay detects peptide-specific cells that respond during in vitro peptide stimulation. This recall response is not operative in the direct enumeration assay. It is possible that by directly enumerating peptide-specific responses, differences are more easily detected as inhibitory and/or stimulatory products generated during the culture conditions may influence the magnitude of responses. In addition the finding that peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cell frequencies (when attached to the Gag protein) are greater for lower vaccine doses suggests in vivo inflammatory conditions may affect the development of immune responses to Gag, but possibly not affect RT immune responses. We have shown previously [5] that BCGΔpanCD is less inflammatory than BCG which would support lower inflammatory conditions influencing higher magnitudes of CD8⁺ T cells frequencies (peptide H-specific CD8⁺ T cells for the BCGpan-Gag vaccine and RT-specific CD8⁺ T cells frequencies for the BCGpan-RT vaccine) using the BCGΔpanCD vector.

The reason for the broader response seen with the use of the pantothenate auxotroph as a vector over that of wild type BCG is not clear, however it may be related to the fact that cellular responses to immunodominant epitopes can limit responses to subdominant epitopes [34] and the differences in in vivo inflammatory conditions generated by BCG and BCGΔpanCD. Pantothenate is required for protection of bacteria from oxidative stress. In addition pantothenate is a key precursor of coenzyme A and acyl carrier proteins that are essential for many intracellular processes including fatty acid metabolism. Lack of pantothenate could result in an alteration in bacterial lipid metabolism and exposure to oxidative stresses which may disrupt the survival of the bacteria in the phagosome and promote phagosome maturation and subsequently CD8⁺ T cell responses. This may operate in conjunction with the fusion of the 19 kDa lipoprotein signal sequence to the HIV proteins that allows acylation of the signal sequence, MHC class I presentation and interaction of the antigen with Toll-like receptor 2, which are processes that promote induction of HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells [35]. A recent study comparing Gag-specific responses when expressed by wild type BCG and the ΔpanCD auxotroph indicated that while clearance of the bacteria occurred at the same rate, there was far less tissue damage, less inflammation and less granuloma formation with the ΔpanCD auxotroph which is a favourable factor for the use of the auxotroph [5]. In this study, higher inflammation generated by the wild type strain of BCG may also have inhibited the development of the response to the subdominant epitopes after the rMVA boost. IFN-γ ELISPOT results indicated that delaying the time of the rMVA booster vaccine to day 56 increased the immune response to subdominant epitopes (data not shown), which probably arises due to a time dependent decrease in the overall activation of the immune system by innate BCG immune responses. It is also possible that use of the BCGΔpanCD vector results in higher and more sustained production of the expressed proteins and thus development of the immune response to subdominant epitopes.

The ability of vaccines to induce responses to multiple HIV proteins is desirable with the broad immune responses increasing the possibility of overcoming immune escape. HIV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells recognising HIV-dominant and subdominant epitopes were detected after a prime with a mix of BCGΔpanCD expressing either Gag, RT or Gp120 proteins and a boost with rMVA. Higher inflammatory responses generated when using a dose of 3×10⁷ cfu may account for the lower total IFN-γ ELISPOT responses achieved with the vaccine mix when compared to the sum of the responses to the individual vaccines used at a dose of 10⁷ cfu. It is also possible that the simultaneous presentation of HIV antigens by the vaccine mix and thus a presentation of a broader repertoire of HIV epitopes than with an individual vaccine, contributes to the observed lower immune responses induced by the vaccine mix. However it is of importance to note that the vaccine mix induced a broad T cell immune response which is a desirable attribute of a vaccine. High levels of CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells recognising both subdominant and dominant epitopes in Gag, RT and Gp120 that produced IFN-γ and TNF-α as well as CD4⁺ T cells that produced IL-2 were generated. Vaccine-specific CD4⁺ T cells producing IL-2 are a desirable outcome of vaccination as these cells are now understood to be preserved in response to infection and to participate in suppression of viremia levels post infection [36]–[38]. In this study CD4⁺ cell produced IL-2 production may have provided help for the induction of the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells.

A number of different studies have shown that recombinant mycobacteria expressing HIV-1 antigens prime the immune system for a heterologous booster vaccine. Macaques vaccinated with rBCG-SIVgag and boosted with a replication deficient vaccinia virus expressing SIV Gag were protected against a mucosal challenge with pathogenic SHIV [9]. In another study monkeys vaccinated with BCG expressing HIV-1 Gag, Pol and a truncated Env elicited a robust, polyfunctional CD8⁺ T cell response following a boost with Ad5 [4]. Tomas Hanke's group have shown, in a number of different studies, that a BCG.HIVA prime followed by a boost with a viral vector expressing the HIVA immunogen, can induce stable, robust, HIV-specific T cell responses [6]–[8], [31]. The rBCG vaccines utilised in this study were able to prime the immune system for a boost with rMVA expressing matching antigens, inducing HIV-specific T cells to both dominant and subdominant epitopes in the individual proteins in BALB/c mice, when used as individual vaccines or in a mix. The expressed HIV proteins contained BALB/c mouse MHC-I H-2K^d and H-2D^d as well as MHC-II restricted epitopes which allowed detection of epitopic breadth of vaccine elicited T cells to be determined. Further studies using these vaccines are currently being carried out in non-human primates.

Although the induction of HIV-specific polyfunctional memory cells was not enumerated in this study data from other studies has indicated that BCG shows great promise as an HIV vaccine which can elicit a broad, robust, polyfunctional T cell response when used as a prime with a heterologous boost. In addition it is cheap to produce, has a good safety record and could be used as a combined vaccine against both HIV and TB. However, BCG can cause disseminated disease in immunocompromised individuals. Thus as BCGΔpanCD is safer than wild type BCG in SCID mice, causes less tissue damage in mice, shows attenuated growth in vivo and gives a broad HIV-specific T cell response to the insert when used as a vaccine vector without compromise of BCG-specific immune responses (data not shown), BCGΔpanCD may be a suitable HIV vaccine vector for use in immunocompromised individuals.

Acknowledgments

We thank Desiree Bowers, Naina Ramjee and Rodney Lucas for technical assistance with immunology assays, molecular biology techniques and mouse work respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RC HS ES A-LW. Performed the experiments: RC HS. Analyzed the data: RC HS ES A-LW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RC HS WJ ES A-LW. Wrote the paper: RC ES A-LW.

References

1. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, Kaewkungwal J, Chiu J, et al. (2009) Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med 361: 2209–2220.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Haynes BF, Gilbert PB, McElrath MJ, Zolla-Pazner S, Tomaras GD, et al. (2012) Immune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. N Engl J Med 366: 1275–1286.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Ndhlovu ZM, Proudfoot J, Cesa K, Alvino DM, McMullen A, et al. (2012) Elite controllers with low to absent effector CD8+ T cell responses maintain highly functional, broadly directed central memory responses. J Virol 86: 6959–6969.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Cayabyab MJ, Korioth-Schmitz B, Sun Y, Carville A, Balachandran H, et al. (2009) Recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG prime-recombinant adenovirus boost vaccination in rhesus monkeys elicits robust polyfunctional simian immunodeficiency virus-specific T-cell responses. J Virol 83: 5505–5513.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Chapman R, Shephard E, Stutz H, Douglass N, Sambandamurthy V, et al. (2012) Priming with a Recombinant Pantothenate Auxotroph of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Boosting with MVA Elicits HIV-1 Gag Specific CD8(+) T Cells. PLoS One 7: e32769.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Hopkins R, Bridgeman A, Bourne C, Mbewe-Mwula A, Sadoff JC, et al. (2011) Optimizing HIV-1-specific CD8(+) T-cell induction by recombinant BCG in prime-boost regimens with heterologous viral vectors. Eur J Immunol 41: 3542–3552.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Im EJ, Saubi N, Virgili G, Sander C, Teoh D, et al. (2007) Vaccine platform for prevention of tuberculosis and mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 through breastfeeding. J Virol 81: 9408–9418.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Rosario M, Hopkins R, Fulkerson J, Borthwick N, Quigley MF, et al. (2010) Novel recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG, ovine atadenovirus, and modified vaccinia virus Ankara vaccines combine to induce robust human immunodeficiency virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses in rhesus macaques. J Virol 84: 5898–5908.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Ami Y, Izumi Y, Matsuo K, Someya K, Kanekiyo M, et al. (2006) Priming-boosting vaccination with recombinant Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin and a nonreplicating vaccinia virus recombinant leads to long-lasting and effective immunity (vol 79, pg 12871, 2005). Journal of Virology 80: 10288.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Chege GK, Burgers WA, Stutz H, Meyers AE, Chapman R, et al. (2013) Robust immunity to an auxotrophic Mycobacterium bovis BCG-VLP prime-boost HIV vaccine candidate in a nonhuman primate model. J Virol 87: 5151–5160.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Tullius MV, Harth G, Maslesa-Galic S, Dillon BJ, Horwitz MA (2008) A replication-limited recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine against tuberculosis designed for human immunodeficiency virus-positive persons is safer and more efficacious than BCG. Infect Immun 76: 5200–5214.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Eisenhut M, Paranjothy S, Abubakar I, Bracebridge S, Lilley M, et al. (2009) BCG vaccination reduces risk of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis as detected by gamma interferon release assay. Vaccine 27: 6116–6120.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Soysal A, Millington KA, Bakir M, Dosanjh D, Aslan Y (2005) Effect of BCG vaccination on risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children with household tuberculosis contact: a prospective community-based study. Lancet 366: 1443–1451.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Roy RB, Sotgiu G, Altet-Gomez N, Tsolia M, Ruga E, et al. (2012) Identifying predictors of interferon-gamma release assay results in pediatric latent tuberculosis: a protective role of bacillus Calmette-Guerin?: a pTB-NET collaborative study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 186: 378–384.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Williamson C, Morris L, Maughan MF, Ping LH, Dryga SA, et al. (2003) Characterization and selection of HIV-1 subtype C isolates for use in vaccine development. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 19: 133–144.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Burgers WA, Shephard E, Monroe JE, Greenhalgh T, Binder A, et al. (2008) Construction, characterization, and immunogenicity of a multigene modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine based on HIV type 1 subtype C. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 24: 195–206.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Williamson AL, Rybiki E, Shephard E, Gray G, Bekker LG, et al. (2012) South African HIV-1 vaccine candidates – the journey from the bench to clinical trials. S Afr Med J 102: 452–455.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Burgers WA, van Harmelen JH, Shephard E, Adams C, Mgwebi T, et al. (2006) Design and preclinical evaluation of a multigene human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C DNA vaccine for clinical trial. J Gen Virol 87: 399–410.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Takahashi H, Cohen J, Hosmalin A, Cease KB, Houghten R, et al. (1988) An immunodominant epitope of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein gp160 recognized by class I major histocompatibility complex molecule-restricted murine cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 3105–3109.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Zahrt TC, Deretic V (2000) An essential two-component signal transduction system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 182: 3832–3838.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Parish T, Stoker NG (1998) Electroporation of mycobacteria. In: Parish T, Stoker NG, editors. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Protocols. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press Inc. 129–144.
22. Mata M, Travers PJ, Liu Q, Frankel FR, Paterson Y (1998) The MHC class I-restricted immune response to HIV-gag in BALB/c mice selects a single epitope that does not have a predictable MHC-binding motif and binds to Kd through interactions between a glutamine at P3 and pocket D. J Immunol. 161: 2985–2993.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Mata M, Paterson Y (1999) Th1 T cell responses to HIV-1 Gag protein delivered by a Listeria monocytogenes vaccine are similar to those induced by endogenous listerial antigens. J Immunol 163: 1449–1456.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. van Harmelen JH, Shephard E, Thomas R, Hanke T, Williamson AL, et al. (2003) Construction and characterisation of a candidate HIV-1 subtype C DNA vaccine for South Africa. Vaccine 21: 4380–4389.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Shephard E, Burgers WA, van Harmelen JH, Monroe JE, Greenhalgh T, et al. (2008) A multigene HIV type 1 subtype C modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine efficiently boosts immune responses to a DNA vaccine in mice. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 24: 207–217.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Russell MS, Iskandar M, Mykytczuk OL, Nash JH, Krishnan L, et al. (2007) A reduced antigen load in vivo, rather than weak inflammation, causes a substantial delay in CD8+ T cell priming against Mycobacterium bovis (bacillus Calmette-Guerin). J Immunol 179: 211–220.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Russell MS, Dudani R, Krishnan L, Sad S (2009) IFN-gamma expressed by T cells regulates the persistence of antigen presentation by limiting the survival of dendritic cells. J Immunol 183: 7710–7718.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Sad S, Dudani R, Gurnani K, Russell M, van Faassen H, et al. (2008) Pathogen proliferation governs the magnitude but compromises the function of CD8 T cells. J Immunol 180: 5853–5861.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. van Faassen H, Saldanha M, Gilbertson D, Dudani R, Krishnan L, et al. (2005) Reducing the stimulation of CD8+ T cells during infection with intracellular bacteria promotes differentiation primarily into a central (CD62LhighCD44high) subset. J Immunol 174: 5341–5350.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. van Faassen H, Dudani R, Krishnan L, Sad S (2004) Prolonged antigen presentation, APC-, and CD8(+) T cell turnover during mycobacterial infection: Comparison with Listeria monocytogenes. Journal of Immunology 172: 3491–3500.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Hopkins R, Bridgeman A, Joseph J, Gilbert SC, McShane H, et al. (2011) Dual neonate vaccine platform against HIV-1 and M. tuberculosis. PLoS One 6: e20067.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Joseph J, Fernandez-Lloris R, Pezzat E, Saubi N, Cardona PJ, et al. (2010) Molecular characterization of heterologous HIV-1gp120 gene expression disruption in Mycobacterium bovis BCG host strain: a critical issue for engineering mycobacterial based-vaccine vectors. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010: 357370.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Mederle I, Le Grand R, Vaslin B, Badell E, Vingert B, et al. (2003) Mucosal administration of three recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG-SIVmac251 strains to cynomolgus macaques induces rectal IgAs and boosts systemic cellular immune responses that are primed by intradermal vaccination. Vaccine 21: 4153–4166.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Rodriguez F, Harkins S, Slifka MK, Whitton JL (2002) Immunodominance in virus-induced CD8(+) T-cell responses is dramatically modified by DNA immunization and is regulated by gamma interferon. Journal of Virology 76: 4251–4259.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Neyrolles O, Gould K, Gares MP, Brett S, Janssen R, et al. (2001) Lipoprotein access to MHC class I presentation during infection of murine macrophages with live mycobacteria. J Immunol 166: 447–457.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Ferrando-Martinez S, Casazza JP, Leal M, Machmach K, Munoz-Fernandez MA, et al. (2012) Differential Gag-specific polyfunctional T cell maturation patterns in HIV-1 elite controllers. J Virol 86: 3667–3674.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Letvin NL (2006) Progress and obstacles in the development of an AIDS vaccine. Nat Rev Immunol 6: 930–939.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Mattapallil JJ, Hill B, Douek DC, Roederer M (2006) Systemic vaccination prevents the total destruction of mucosal CD4 T cells during acute SIV challenge. J Med Primatol 35: 217–224.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, Kaewkungwal J, Chiu J, et al. (2009) Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med 361: 2209–2220.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Haynes BF, Gilbert PB, McElrath MJ, Zolla-Pazner S, Tomaras GD, et al. (2012) Immune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. N Engl J Med 366: 1275–1286.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Ndhlovu ZM, Proudfoot J, Cesa K, Alvino DM, McMullen A, et al. (2012) Elite controllers with low to absent effector CD8+ T cell responses maintain highly functional, broadly directed central memory responses. J Virol 86: 6959–6969.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Cayabyab MJ, Korioth-Schmitz B, Sun Y, Carville A, Balachandran H, et al. (2009) Recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG prime-recombinant adenovirus boost vaccination in rhesus monkeys elicits robust polyfunctional simian immunodeficiency virus-specific T-cell responses. J Virol 83: 5505–5513.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Chapman R, Shephard E, Stutz H, Douglass N, Sambandamurthy V, et al. (2012) Priming with a Recombinant Pantothenate Auxotroph of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Boosting with MVA Elicits HIV-1 Gag Specific CD8(+) T Cells. PLoS One 7: e32769.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Hopkins R, Bridgeman A, Bourne C, Mbewe-Mwula A, Sadoff JC, et al. (2011) Optimizing HIV-1-specific CD8(+) T-cell induction by recombinant BCG in prime-boost regimens with heterologous viral vectors. Eur J Immunol 41: 3542–3552.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Im EJ, Saubi N, Virgili G, Sander C, Teoh D, et al. (2007) Vaccine platform for prevention of tuberculosis and mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 through breastfeeding. J Virol 81: 9408–9418.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Rosario M, Hopkins R, Fulkerson J, Borthwick N, Quigley MF, et al. (2010) Novel recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG, ovine atadenovirus, and modified vaccinia virus Ankara vaccines combine to induce robust human immunodeficiency virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses in rhesus macaques. J Virol 84: 5898–5908.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Ami Y, Izumi Y, Matsuo K, Someya K, Kanekiyo M, et al. (2006) Priming-boosting vaccination with recombinant Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin and a nonreplicating vaccinia virus recombinant leads to long-lasting and effective immunity (vol 79, pg 12871, 2005). Journal of Virology 80: 10288.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Chege GK, Burgers WA, Stutz H, Meyers AE, Chapman R, et al. (2013) Robust immunity to an auxotrophic Mycobacterium bovis BCG-VLP prime-boost HIV vaccine candidate in a nonhuman primate model. J Virol 87: 5151–5160.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Tullius MV, Harth G, Maslesa-Galic S, Dillon BJ, Horwitz MA (2008) A replication-limited recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine against tuberculosis designed for human immunodeficiency virus-positive persons is safer and more efficacious than BCG. Infect Immun 76: 5200–5214.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Eisenhut M, Paranjothy S, Abubakar I, Bracebridge S, Lilley M, et al. (2009) BCG vaccination reduces risk of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis as detected by gamma interferon release assay. Vaccine 27: 6116–6120.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Soysal A, Millington KA, Bakir M, Dosanjh D, Aslan Y (2005) Effect of BCG vaccination on risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children with household tuberculosis contact: a prospective community-based study. Lancet 366: 1443–1451.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Roy RB, Sotgiu G, Altet-Gomez N, Tsolia M, Ruga E, et al. (2012) Identifying predictors of interferon-gamma release assay results in pediatric latent tuberculosis: a protective role of bacillus Calmette-Guerin?: a pTB-NET collaborative study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 186: 378–384.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Williamson C, Morris L, Maughan MF, Ping LH, Dryga SA, et al. (2003) Characterization and selection of HIV-1 subtype C isolates for use in vaccine development. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 19: 133–144.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Burgers WA, Shephard E, Monroe JE, Greenhalgh T, Binder A, et al. (2008) Construction, characterization, and immunogenicity of a multigene modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine based on HIV type 1 subtype C. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 24: 195–206.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Williamson AL, Rybiki E, Shephard E, Gray G, Bekker LG, et al. (2012) South African HIV-1 vaccine candidates – the journey from the bench to clinical trials. S Afr Med J 102: 452–455.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Burgers WA, van Harmelen JH, Shephard E, Adams C, Mgwebi T, et al. (2006) Design and preclinical evaluation of a multigene human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C DNA vaccine for clinical trial. J Gen Virol 87: 399–410.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Takahashi H, Cohen J, Hosmalin A, Cease KB, Houghten R, et al. (1988) An immunodominant epitope of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein gp160 recognized by class I major histocompatibility complex molecule-restricted murine cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 3105–3109.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Zahrt TC, Deretic V (2000) An essential two-component signal transduction system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 182: 3832–3838.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Parish T, Stoker NG (1998) Electroporation of mycobacteria. In: Parish T, Stoker NG, editors. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Protocols. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press Inc. 129–144.

[ref22] 22. Mata M, Travers PJ, Liu Q, Frankel FR, Paterson Y (1998) The MHC class I-restricted immune response to HIV-gag in BALB/c mice selects a single epitope that does not have a predictable MHC-binding motif and binds to Kd through interactions between a glutamine at P3 and pocket D. J Immunol. 161: 2985–2993.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Mata M, Paterson Y (1999) Th1 T cell responses to HIV-1 Gag protein delivered by a Listeria monocytogenes vaccine are similar to those induced by endogenous listerial antigens. J Immunol 163: 1449–1456.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. van Harmelen JH, Shephard E, Thomas R, Hanke T, Williamson AL, et al. (2003) Construction and characterisation of a candidate HIV-1 subtype C DNA vaccine for South Africa. Vaccine 21: 4380–4389.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Shephard E, Burgers WA, van Harmelen JH, Monroe JE, Greenhalgh T, et al. (2008) A multigene HIV type 1 subtype C modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine efficiently boosts immune responses to a DNA vaccine in mice. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 24: 207–217.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Russell MS, Iskandar M, Mykytczuk OL, Nash JH, Krishnan L, et al. (2007) A reduced antigen load in vivo, rather than weak inflammation, causes a substantial delay in CD8+ T cell priming against Mycobacterium bovis (bacillus Calmette-Guerin). J Immunol 179: 211–220.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Russell MS, Dudani R, Krishnan L, Sad S (2009) IFN-gamma expressed by T cells regulates the persistence of antigen presentation by limiting the survival of dendritic cells. J Immunol 183: 7710–7718.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Sad S, Dudani R, Gurnani K, Russell M, van Faassen H, et al. (2008) Pathogen proliferation governs the magnitude but compromises the function of CD8 T cells. J Immunol 180: 5853–5861.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. van Faassen H, Saldanha M, Gilbertson D, Dudani R, Krishnan L, et al. (2005) Reducing the stimulation of CD8+ T cells during infection with intracellular bacteria promotes differentiation primarily into a central (CD62LhighCD44high) subset. J Immunol 174: 5341–5350.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. van Faassen H, Dudani R, Krishnan L, Sad S (2004) Prolonged antigen presentation, APC-, and CD8(+) T cell turnover during mycobacterial infection: Comparison with Listeria monocytogenes. Journal of Immunology 172: 3491–3500.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Hopkins R, Bridgeman A, Joseph J, Gilbert SC, McShane H, et al. (2011) Dual neonate vaccine platform against HIV-1 and M. tuberculosis. PLoS One 6: e20067.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Joseph J, Fernandez-Lloris R, Pezzat E, Saubi N, Cardona PJ, et al. (2010) Molecular characterization of heterologous HIV-1gp120 gene expression disruption in Mycobacterium bovis BCG host strain: a critical issue for engineering mycobacterial based-vaccine vectors. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010: 357370.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Mederle I, Le Grand R, Vaslin B, Badell E, Vingert B, et al. (2003) Mucosal administration of three recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG-SIVmac251 strains to cynomolgus macaques induces rectal IgAs and boosts systemic cellular immune responses that are primed by intradermal vaccination. Vaccine 21: 4153–4166.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Rodriguez F, Harkins S, Slifka MK, Whitton JL (2002) Immunodominance in virus-induced CD8(+) T-cell responses is dramatically modified by DNA immunization and is regulated by gamma interferon. Journal of Virology 76: 4251–4259.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Neyrolles O, Gould K, Gares MP, Brett S, Janssen R, et al. (2001) Lipoprotein access to MHC class I presentation during infection of murine macrophages with live mycobacteria. J Immunol 166: 447–457.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Ferrando-Martinez S, Casazza JP, Leal M, Machmach K, Munoz-Fernandez MA, et al. (2012) Differential Gag-specific polyfunctional T cell maturation patterns in HIV-1 elite controllers. J Virol 86: 3667–3674.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Letvin NL (2006) Progress and obstacles in the development of an AIDS vaccine. Nat Rev Immunol 6: 930–939.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Mattapallil JJ, Hill B, Douek DC, Roederer M (2006) Systemic vaccination prevents the total destruction of mucosal CD4 T cells during acute SIV challenge. J Med Primatol 35: 217–224.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

Priming with Recombinant Auxotrophic BCG Expressing HIV-1 Gag, RT and Gp120 and Boosting with Recombinant MVA Induces a Robust T Cell Response in Mice

Priming with Recombinant Auxotrophic BCG Expressing HIV-1 Gag, RT and Gp120 and Boosting with Recombinant MVA Induces a Robust T Cell Response in Mice

Correction

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Construction of recombinant BCG (rBCG) and vaccine preparation

Assessment of in vitro and in vivo genetic stability of the rBCG

Mouse immunization

Preparation of splenocytes for immune assays

IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISPOT assays

Quantification of secreted cytokines

MHC class I peptide pentameric complex binding

Statistical analysis

Results

Selection of genetically stable rBCG vaccines

Use of a pantothenate auxotroph of BCG improves the priming ability of the rBCG vaccine

Immune responses to HIV-1 Gag, RT and Env can be achieved when a mixture of the rBCGΔpanCD vaccines are used

Th1 cytokine production

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References