Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Transcription Factor TFAP2C Regulates Major Programs Required for Murine Fetal Germ Cell Maintenance and Haploinsufficiency Predisposes to Teratomas in Male Mice

  • Jana Schemmer,

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Department of Developmental Pathology, Bonn, Germany

  • Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo,

    Affiliation Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Münster, Germany

  • Natalie Haas,

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Department of Developmental Pathology, Bonn, Germany

  • Sabine Schäfer,

    Current address: Pacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Department of Developmental Pathology, Bonn, Germany

  • Susanne N. Weber,

    Current address: Department of Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Street, Homburg, Germany

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Department of Developmental Pathology, Bonn, Germany

  • Astrid Becker,

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute for Reconstructive Neurobiology, Life&Brain Center, Bonn, Germany

  • Dawid Eckert,

    Current address: BIOBSERVE GmbH, St. Augustin, Germany

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Department of Developmental Pathology, Bonn, Germany

  • Andreas Zimmer,

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute for Reconstructive Neurobiology, Life&Brain Center, Bonn, Germany

  • Daniel Nettersheim,

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Department of Developmental Pathology, Bonn, Germany

  • Hubert Schorle

    Hubert.Schorle@ukb.uni-bonn.de

    Affiliation University of Bonn Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Department of Developmental Pathology, Bonn, Germany

Transcription Factor TFAP2C Regulates Major Programs Required for Murine Fetal Germ Cell Maintenance and Haploinsufficiency Predisposes to Teratomas in Male Mice

  • Jana Schemmer, 
  • Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo, 
  • Natalie Haas, 
  • Sabine Schäfer, 
  • Susanne N. Weber, 
  • Astrid Becker, 
  • Dawid Eckert, 
  • Andreas Zimmer, 
  • Daniel Nettersheim, 
  • Hubert Schorle
PLOS
x

Correction

29 Aug 2013: Schemmer J, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Haas N, Schäfer S, Weber SN, et al. (2013) Correction: Transcription Factor TFAP2C Regulates Major Programs Required for Murine Fetal Germ Cell Maintenance and Haploinsufficiency Predisposes to Teratomas in Male Mice. PLOS ONE 8(8): 10.1371/annotation/579ac618-0ed0-4451-a4fc-10bad989024b. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/579ac618-0ed0-4451-a4fc-10bad989024b View correction

Abstract

Maintenance and maturation of primordial germ cells is controlled by complex genetic and epigenetic cascades, and disturbances in this network lead to either infertility or malignant aberration. Transcription factor TFAP2C has been described to be essential for primordial germ cell maintenance and to be upregulated in several human germ cell cancers. Using global gene expression profiling, we identified genes deregulated upon loss of Tfap2c in embryonic stem cells and primordial germ cell-like cells. We show that loss of Tfap2c affects many aspects of the genetic network regulating germ cell biology, such as downregulation of maturation markers and induction of markers indicative for somatic differentiation, cell cycle, epigenetic remodeling and pluripotency. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation analyses demonstrated binding of TFAP2C to regulatory regions of deregulated genes (Sfrp1, Dmrt1, Nanos3, c-Kit, Cdk6, Cdkn1a, Fgf4, Klf4, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l) suggesting that these genes are direct transcriptional targets of TFAP2C in primordial germ cells. Since Tfap2c deficient primordial germ cell-like cells display cancer related deregulations in epigenetic remodeling, cell cycle and pluripotency control, the Tfap2c-knockout allele was bred onto 129S2/Sv genetic background. There, mice heterozygous for Tfap2c develop with high incidence germ cell cancer resembling human pediatric germ cell tumors. Precursor lesions can be observed as early as E16.5 in developing testes displaying persisting expression of pluripotency markers. We further demonstrate that mice with a heterozygous deletion of the TFAP2C target gene Nanos3 are also prone to develop teratomas. These data highlight TFAP2C as a critical and dose-sensitive regulator of germ cell fate.

Introduction

Germ cell cancers (GCCs) are usually diagnosed between the age of 20–40 years and are the most common cancer type of young men [1]. In infants and pre-pubertal adolescents, teratomas and yolk-sac tumors (Type I GCC) are detected in gonads, cranium or along the body midline. These tumors characteristically consist of tissues of all three germ layers and are generally benign in nature, with rare malignant transformation. It is assumed that the precursor cells of these tumors are primordial germ cells/gonocytes which fail to progress into spermatogonia [2];3;4] and transform into embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells which appear at embryonic day (E) 15.5 [5]. Knowledge of the regulatory network of germ cell specification, maintenance and differentiation is required to further understand the molecular basis of this malignancy and some of the molecular key players have been determined in the past years. Specification of murine primordial germ cells (PGCs) occurs at E6.75 and is mediated by BMP signaling (BMP4/BMP8b) [6]; [7]; [8], which leads to induction of Prdm1 and Prdm14. PRDM1 (BLIMP1) together with PRDM14 are viewed as the key regulators since they orchestrate the re-acquisition of pluripotency and repression of the somatic program in PGCs [9]; [10]; [11]. Single cell analyses in Blimp1 deficient PGCs suggest that the transcription factor TFAP2C is a downstream target of BLIMP1, as Tfap2c level was found to be dramatically reduced in Blimp1 deficient PGCs [10]. TFAP2C (Tcfap2c/AP-2γ) is a member of the activator protein-2 (AP-2) family, which comprises of five closely related members, namely Tfap2a-e. They are characterized by a highly conserved DNA-binding and dimerization motif at the C-terminus. AP-2 transcription factors bind to DNA as functional dimers and their activation is mediated by an N-terminal transactivation domain [12]. Tfap2c is expressed in murine PGCs shortly after their specification from E7.25 up to E12.5 after they have migrated and colonized the genital ridges [13]. After arrival in the genital ridges, PGCs initiate further differentiation indicated by downregulation of pluripotency markers Nanog, Oct3/4, Sox2 [14], exit of mitosis [15], upregulation of germ cell markers Mutvh and Dazl [16]; [17] and epigenetic remodeling (remethylation, upregulation of de novo methylases) [18]. Similar to Blimp1 [9], Tfap2c deficient PGCs are lost shortly after specification at E8.5. In Tfap2c−/−PGCs, germ cell markers (like Stella/Dppa3, Nanos3, Dazl, Mutvh) are downregulated and the somatic gene program is upregulated (Hoxb1, Hoxa1, T) resulting in loss of PGC-fate and somatic differentiation of the cells [13]. In humans, TFAP2C expression is detected in fetal germ cells from week 12 to 37 of pregnancy and in a small subset of cells (gonocytes) in the infantile testes (until 4 months of postnatal age) [19]. Furthermore, high levels of TFAP2C protein were observed in precursor lesions of GCC (carcinoma in situ (CIS)) and classical seminomas [19]; [20].

In this study, we analyzed the consequences of lack of Tfap2c in PGC-like cells (PGCLCs). Global cDNA expression profiling revealed that Tfap2c deficiency affects cell cycle exit, epigenetic remodeling, germ cell differentiation and regulation of pluripotency. Using chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analyses we show that Sfrp1, Dmrt1, Nanos3, c-Kit, Cdk6, Cdkn1a, Fgf4, Klf4, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l are direct transcriptional target genes of TFAP2C. The data suggest that TFAP2C governs many aspects of PGC development, some of them being also involved in GCC formation. In line with this, we demonstrate that haploinsufficiency of Tfap2c or its target gene Nanos3 lead to high rate of GCC in 129S2/Sv mice, resembling human pediatric germ cell tumors.

Materials and Methods

Animals/Ethics Statement

All experiments were conducted according to the German law of animal protection and in agreement with the approval of the local institutional animal care committees (Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, North Rhine-Westphalia (approval ID: #8.87-50.10.31.08.238). The experiments were conducted in accordance with the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals as announced by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.

Generation of Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2c−/− ESCs

The derivation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) from blastocysts was performed by mating Blimp1mVenus (Tg(Prdm1-Venus1)Sait, MGI:3805969) [21] with Tfap2cflox/flox (Tfap2ctm1Hsc, MGI:2176695) [22] mice. ES cells were derived according to published protocols to obtain Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2cflox/flox ESCs [23]. Transient transfection with a pGK-Cre plasmid resulted in Cre-mediated excision of the floxed sites leading to Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2c−/−ESCs. Genotyping of Tfap2c and Blimp1mVenus alleles was done as described previously [21]; [22].

Embryoid Body Formation

For gene expression analysis Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2cctrl and Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2c−/−ESCs were cultured for embryoid body (EB) formation in DMEM/F12/Neurobasal media (1∶1) supplemented with Glutamax, N2-Supplement (1×), B27-Supplement (1×), L-Glutamine (1×) (all Gibco, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), BSA (2,5 mg/ml; Sigma Aldrich; Munich, Germany), ß-Mercaptoethanol (100 µM, PAA; GE Healthcare; USA), Insulin (1 mg/ml; Sigma Aldrich; Munich, Germany), PD0325901 (1 µM; Stemgent, San Diego, USA), CHIR99021 (3 µM; Stemgent, San Diego, USA) and Lif (1000 U/ml; Esgro, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Cells were dissociated with Accutase (PAA; GE Healthcare; USA). PGCLC differentiation was performed as described by Hayashi et al. [24]. Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2cctrl-PGCLCs and StellaGFP ESCs [25] (which were differentiated into EBs for 5 days as described by Young et al. [26]) were used for ChIP analyses. For StellaGFP-PGCLC in vitro differentiation DMEM supplemented with GlutaMAX, Sodium Pyruvat (Gibco, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), ß-mercaptoethanol (100 µM; PAA; GE Healthcare; USA), nonessential amino acids (1×; PAA; GE Healthcare; USA); essential amino acids (1×; PAA; GE Healthcare; USA); L-Glutamine (2 mM; PAA; GE Healthcare; USA); Penicillin/Streptomycin (1×; PAA; GE Healthcare; USA); LIF (1000 U/ml; Esgro, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany); 15% ES FCS (Hyclone; Thermo Scientific; USA) and BMP4 (100 ng; R&D Systems; Wiesbaden, Germany) was used.

Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)

Embryoid bodies were washed with PBS, dissociated with Accutase (PAA; GE Healthcare; USA) and filtered through a cell strainer (40 µm, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). Analysis was performed using FACS Aria III analytical flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). All Blimp1mVenus positive cells were recorded per experiment. Data were analyzed using BD FACSDiva 6.3.1 software. Significance was calculated by 2 paired t-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Transfection of TCam-2 Cells

siRNA mediated knockdown of TFAP2C in TCam-2 cells was performed as described by [27]. Scrambled and TFAP2C siRNA were obtained from Origene (TFAP2C SR304789, Origene Technologies, Rockville, USA).

Chromatin-immunoprecipitation

Aliquots of 1×105 PGCLCs were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 7 min and incubated with 0.1 M glycine for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were resuspended in 200 µl SDS Lysis Buffer and sonicated for 2 cycles (5 min) and 1 cycle (2 min) (30 sec “ON”/30 sec “OFF”). Chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments were performed as described in [28]. For immunoprecipitation 3 µg antibody against TFAP2C (clone H77/sc-8977 X; SantaCruz, Santa Cruz, USA) and as control antibody against rabbit IgG (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) on protein G coupled Dynabeads (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) were used. Immunoprecipitated DNA was amplified using GenomePlex® Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Kit (WGA4) (Sigma Aldrich; Munich, Germany) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Amplified ChIP DNA was subjected to qPCR using a Maxima SYBR Green/ROX (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific; USA) in a ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystemş Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s specified parameters. Amplicons were normalized to the non-immunoprecipitated input DNA. Primers used for qPCR are listed in Table S4.

Semiquantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA from ESCs and sorted PGC-like cells were isolated using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). First-strand cDNA were synthesized using RevertAid Premium reverse transcriptase (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific; USA). RNA from gonads was extracted using the Nucleo Spin FFPE RNA Kit (Macherey & Nagel, Düren, Germany); 100 ng was used for cDNA synthesis (SuperScriptIII; Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). RT-PCR-primers are listed in Table S5.

qRT-PCR

RNA from PGCLCs and gonads was isolated using RNeasy Mini/Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), respectively. Total RNA from TCam-2 cells was extracted by Trizol (Sigma Aldrich; Munich, Germany) according to manufactureŕs instructions. For amplification of PGCLCs, gonadal and TCam-2 mRNA, SYBR GreenER Reagent Mix (Invitrogen, Karlsbad, Germany)/Maxima SYBR Green/ROX (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific; USA) was used. Housekeeping genes βActin and Gapdh were used for data normalization. The experiments were performed in biological triplicates. Primer sequences for qRT-PCR are given in Table S6.

Transcriptome Microarray Analysis

For the microarray experiments GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used. RNA was extracted from ESCs and sorted PGCLCs using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA quality was tested using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Böblingen, Germany). For the Affymetrix array, 100 ng of total RNA were used. The arrays were washed and stained according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and scanned in a GeneChip scanner 3000 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The normalization was calculated with the RMA (Robust Multi-array Analysis) algorithm [29]. Data post-processing and graphics were performed with in-house developed functions in Matlab. Hierarchical clustering of genes and samples was performed with one minus correlation metric and the unweighted average distance (UPGMA) (also known as group average) linkage method. The gene ontology analysis based on AMIGO gene ontology database [30]. The significance of the gene ontology terms of the differentially expressed genes was analyzed using an enrichment approach based on the hypergeometric distribution. All sets of gene ontology terms were backpropagated from the final term appearing in the gene annotation until the root term of each ontology. The significance (p-value) of the gene ontology terms enrichment was calculated using the hypergeometric distribution. The multitest effect influence was corrected through controlling the false discovery rate using the Benjamini-Hochberg correction at a significance level α = 0.05. The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE45941.

Laser Microdissection

Paraffin-embedded tissue was sectioned to 10 µm thickness and mounted on P.A.L.M. Frame slides (Carl-Zeiss Micro Imaging, Göttingen, Germany) and stained with SSEA-1 antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA). SSEA-1 positive areas were dissected using P.A.L.M. Microlaser Technology (Carl-Zeiss Micro Imaging, Göttingen, Germany). Dissected tissue was collected in lysis buffer (1 mM EDTA pH 8, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 0.5% Tween20, 100 mg/ml proteinase K) and incubated at 37°C for 3 hrs, heated to 85°C for 10 min. DNA was extracted with QiaAmp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA was extracted with Nucleo Spin FFPE RNA Kit (Macherey & Nagel, Düren, Germany).

Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Sections and cells were fixed and stained as described by Weber et al. [13]. The following antibodies were used: TFAP2C (1∶300–1∶500, SantaCruz, Santa Cruz, USA), OCT3/4 (1∶100, SantaCruz, Santa Cruz, USA), SSEA1 (1∶100, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA), anti-rabbit biotinylated (1∶500; DAKO, Hamburg, Germany), anti-rat biotinylated (1∶200; DAKO, Hamburg, Germany), anti-rabbit Alexa fluor 594 (1∶1000; Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany); anti-mouse Alexa fluor 488 (1∶1000; Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). Nuclei were stained using 1∶500 33342 Hoechst (1 mg/ml; Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany).

Results

Tfap2c Deficient ESCs Generate Less PGCLCs

In order to analyze the molecular consequences of Tfap2c deficiency in PGCs we took advantage of protocols allowing PGCLC derivation from embryonic stem cells through an epiblast-like cell (EpiLC) intermediate [24]. Blimp1mVenus reporter mice [21] were bred into the Tfap2cflox/flox background [22] and two Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2cflox/flox embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines were established. Next, the ESC-lines were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding the Cre-Protein (pgk-Cre) mediating the deletion of the Tfap2cflox/flox alleles resulting in Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2c−/− ESCs (#1-Tfap2c−/− and #2-Tfap2c−/−) (Fig. S1 A, B, C). For all following experiments, the parental Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2cflox/flox ESC-lines served as control (ctrl). Under serum and feeder-free conditions ESCs were differentiated for two days into EpiLCs, which display a flattened epithelial-like structure (Fig. S2 A). The expression of marker genes in #1-ctrl, #1-Tfap2c−/−, #2-ctrl and #2-Tfap2c−/− cells was analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR to address the question, whether loss of TFAP2C affects differentiation from ESCs to EpiLCs. Upon differentiation into EpiLCs, marker genes for ESCs, Klf4 and Prdm14, were downregulated and epiblast associated genes Fgf5 and Dnmt3b were upregulated (Fig. S2 B). The results suggest that the generation of EpiLCs is not affected by lack of TFAP2C.

Next, PGCLC differentiation was induced by cultivating EpiLCs in medium supplemented with BMP4, BMP8b, SCF, LIF and EGF [24]. Induction of the Blimp1mVenus reporter indicated the generation of PGCLCs, which were quantified using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) (Fig. S1 C/S2 C). Using Tfap2c−/− ESC-lines, we obtained less Blimp1mVenus positive PGCLCs (#1∶9.3% vs. 2.7% (significant); #2∶3% vs. 1.5% (non-significant)) (Fig. S2 D). RT-PCR demonstrated that lack of Tfap2c did not affect the expression of the early germ cell marker Prdm14, but lead to a reduction of late markers (Stella, Nanos3) (Fig. S2 E). Expression of Prdm14 and the Blimp1mVenus reporter indicate that PGCLCs are specified in the absence of TFAP2C. However, the reduction of the number of PGCLCs strongly suggests a role of TFAP2C in the maintenance of the PGC-fate. The fact, that the expression of late germ cells markers is impaired argues against the possibility that the Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs undergo premature differentiation.

Transcriptome Analysis of Tfap2c Deficient ESCs and in vitro Differentiated PGCLCs

To gain insight into the consequences of lack of Tfap2c on a genome-wide level, gene expression analysis using ESCs and PGCLCs (#1-ctrl; #1-Tfap2c−/−; #2-ctrl and #2-Tfap2c−/−) was performed with Affymetrix Mouse 430 2.0 microarrays. Hierarchical clustering showed that Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs cluster close together and distant from control samples indicating the high similarity of gene expression profiles within the Tfap2c−/− and ctrl pairs (Fig. 1 A). Heat map shows differentially expressed transcripts between the Tfap2c−/− and ctrl PGCLCs (Fig. 1 B). Scatter plotting of Tfap2c−/− vs. ctrl PGCLCs identified 455 significantly deregulated genes (Fold-change >1.5 in log2 scale) (Fig. 1 C; Table S1). Of note, TFAP2C has only moderate effects in ESCs (albeit Tfap2c is expressed in 10–15% of ESCs) [23] as indicated by hierarchical clustering, heat mapping and scatter plotting (Fig. 1 A, B, D). In ESCs, only 26 genes were deregulated after loss of TFAP2C (Table S2). Comparing the PGCLC with ESC datasets revealed an overlap of 13 genes (Fig. 1 E; Table S3). These results indicate that TFAP2C controls a diverse set of genes in ESCs and PGCLCs and that the lack of this protein in PGCLCs affects the expression of far more genes compared to ESCs.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Genes regulated in PGCLCs and ESCs by TFAP2C.

Affymetrix microarray gene expression analysis performed with RNA extracted from #1-ctrl; #1-Tfap2c−/− and #2-ctrl; #2-Tfap2c−/− ESCs and PGCLCs. (A) Hierarchical clustering. The red bars cluster the ESCs, green bars the Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs and blue bars ctrl PGCLCs, respectively. The shorter the horizontal bar that connects two branches the closer are the populations. (B) Heat map was performed with the probes whose range or variation across all samples was at least 3. Color bar on top codifies the gene expression in log2 scale. Red and blue indicate higher and lower relative expression. (C-D) Pairwise scatter plot of global gene expression in ctrl versus Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs (C) and ESCs (D). Black lines indicate 1.5 fold-change in log2 scale of gene expression levels between paired PGCLCs and ESCs. Color bars on the side display the scattering density with light blue indicating lower and blue higher scatter density. Genes upregulated in Tfap2c−/− samples are shown as red dots; genes downregulated are shown as green dots. R2 = Fisher’s correlation coefficient. (E) Venn diagram; in PGCLCs 455 genes are deregulated; in ESCs 26 genes are deregulated. The intersection part show the commonly deregulated genes (n = 13) by TFAP2C in PGCLCs and ESCs (Fold-change >1.5 in log2 scale).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.g001

Next we performed gene ontology analysis [30] (Data S1) and categorized the genes deregulated in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs in relation to their biological function. Here, it became evident that in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs many genes associated with somatic differentiation (category I) are upregulated, whereas genes associated with germ cell maintenance and maturation (category II) are downregulated (Table 1). Of note, we also included few genes in Table 1 with relevance to the respective category displaying a fold-change rate below our initial cutoff (≤1.5 in log2 scale, see Table 1). These data suggest an impairment of PGC to gonocyte progression and derepression of somatic differentiation upon loss of TFAP2C. These results confirm earlier data, where markers indicative for somatic differentiation were induced in Tfap2c deficient EBs [13]. In addition, we found upregulation of genes associated with cell cycle regulation (category III), pluripotency (category IV) and epigenetic modification (category V) in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs. The data indicate that in migrating PGCs, TFAP2C represses the cell cycle, pluripotency program and DNA methylation.

thumbnail
Table 1. Categorized deregulated genes in Tfap2−/−PGCLCs based on gene ontology analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.t001

Subsequently, differential expression seen in the cDNA-microarray of selected marker genes was validated using qRT-PCR in PGCLCs (Fig. 2 A) (downregulated: Nanos3 (−4.78), Rhox5 (−4.26), Stella (−3.84), Dmrt1 (−3.07), c-Kit (−2.78) and Dazl (−0.88) and upregulated: Fgf4 (4.84), Dnmt3l (3.79), Ccnd1 (3.36), Dnmt3b (2.07) and Klf4 (1.95) [fold-changes in log2 scale]). Furthermore, expression of several markers was determined after siRNA mediated knockdown of TFAP2C in the human seminoma-like cell line TCam-2 [31] (Fig. 2 B). Here, after reduction of TFAP2C (to ∼30% compared to the control level) c-KIT (−2.22) and DMRT1 (−1.58) were downregulated and CCND1 (1.60), SOX2 (1.34), DNMT3L (0.98), HOXA5 (0.88), and DNMT3B (0.39) were upregulated (all fold-changes in log2 scale). So, in both systems all selected genes were deregulated in agreement with the array analysis. This suggests a conserved function of TFAP2C/Tfap2c in humans and mice.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Validation of cDNA microarray data.

(A) Quantitative RT-PCR of a subset of markers with RNA isolated from ctrl and Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs. Expression levels were normalized to βActin and expression level of ctrl PGCLCs were set to 1. qRT-PCR was performed in biological triplicates. Error bars indicate standard deviation. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR of a subset of markers with RNA isolated from TCam-2 cells after siRNA mediated knockdown of TFAP2C. Expression levels were normalized to GAPDH and expression levels of scrambled-siRNA-transfection were set to 1. qRT-PCR was performed in biological triplicate. Error bars indicate standard deviation. (C) ChIP/qPCR analysis for Tfap2c was performed with four biological replicates of PGCLCs. The qPCR results were calculated with the percentage input method and ChIP analyses with IgG antibody served as control and were set to 1. Error bars indicate standard deviation. ChIP analysis demonstrates increased binding of TFAP2C at indicated loci. (A) – (C) Marker genes were grouped in categories: somatic differentiation (category I), germ cell maintenance and maturation (category II), cell cycle regulation (category III), pluripotency (category IV) and epigenetic modification (category V).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.g002

ChIP Analysis Reveals Direct Transcriptional Targets

To evaluate direct binding of TFAP2C to promotor regions of deregulated genes we performed TFAP2C specific ChIP-analysis using PGCLCs derived from Stella-GFP ESCs [25] and Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2cctrl ESCs. Putative TFAP2C binding sites identified by the rVista algorithm (based on TRANSFAC) [32] (sequence information Table S4) in genomic regions of Sfrp1, Dmrt1, Nanos3, c-Kit, Cdk6, Cdkn1a, Fgf4, Klf4, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l were enriched for TFAP2C protein (vs. IgG control) (Fig. 2 C), implicating those genes as direct target genes of TFAP2C.

Male Mice Heterozygous for the Tfap2c Deletion Develop Teratomas

Our analyses revealed, that TFAP2C is not only involved in suppression of the somatic program but also controls cell cycle, epigenetic modifications and pluripotency. Since these pathways are discussed to be deregulated in GCC, we wondered whether reduction of Tfap2c could contribute to the initiation of these tumors. The Tfap2ctm1Hsc (MGI: 93391) allele [22] was bred into the 129S2/Sv genetic background and screened for effects of haploinsufficiency. To determine whether loss of one allele of Tfap2c affected the overall levels of Tfap2c-mRNA, E12.5 genital ridges of control and Tfap2c+/− embryos were dissected, RNA isolated and qRT-PCR analysis performed. Deletion of one Tfap2c-allele leads to reduction of Tfap2c-mRNA (Fig. 3 A) and to upregulation of the direct target Cdkn1a/p21 (Fig. 3 A). Starting from the seventh generation in 129S2/Sv 82% (n = 51) of all heterozygous males developed testicular tumors (Fig. 3 B) (35% presented as bilateral cases), whereas wildtype littermates (n = 22) remained tumor-free. Tumors presented as teratomas (Fig. 3 C) and displayed a variety of tissues like immature glia (Fig. 3 D) and mature cartilage (Fig. 3 E), muscle (Fig. 3 E), respiratory epithelium (Fig. 3 F) as well as squamous epithelium (Fig. 3 G). Of note, the tumors did not have a negative effect on life expectancy of affected animals, as selected mice were observed for over 1.5 years without apparent impairment of their general well-being.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Teratoma development in Tfap2c heterozygous mice in 129S2/Sv genetic background.

(A) Quantitative RT-PCR with RNA isolated from E12.5 genital ridges of wt and Tfap2c+/− embryos was performed. Expression levels of Tfap2c and p21 were normalized to Gapdh. qRT-PCR was performed in biological duplicates. Error bars indicate standard deviation. (B) Percentage of total tumor incidence in Tfap2c heterozygous 129S2/Sv male mice. The seventh generation in 129S2/Sv shows 82% (n = 51) testicular tumors. Red bar: bilateral cases (35%), blue bar: unilateral tumors (47%). (C) Gross pathology of testicular teratoma in Tfap2c+/− male mice. (D–G) HE-staining of testicular teratomas of 3–6 month old mice. Tumors show immature glia (D), mature cartilage, muscle (E), respiratory epithelium (F) and squamous epithelium (G). Scale bars: 200 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.g003

Pluripotency is Retained in Foci of Tfap2c Heterozygous Testes

Tumors were reminiscent of early childhood germ cell cancer (Type I) in humans. These tumors initiate early during germ cell development and are characterized by failure of PGCs to downregulate pluripotency markers. The lesions represent hallmarks of embryonal carcinomas [1]. Here, testes of E15.5 and E16.5 Tfap2c+/− embryos were dissected, paraffin embedded and sectioned. Immunohistochemical staining of Tfap2c+/− gonads revealed foci of cells which maintain strong SSEA1 (Fig. 4 A) and OCT3/4 (Fig. 4 B) protein levels. The cells of these foci were still localized within the confines of the seminiferous tubule at this time point. Serial sections suggest that OCT3/4 positive foci were negative for TFAP2C (Fig. 4 C). SSEA-1 positive foci of E16.5 testes were micro-dissected and subjected to RT-PCR and adjacent (SSEA-1 negative) testes tissue served as control. In SSEA1-positive foci Nanog and Sox2 mRNA was detectable (Fig. 4 D). The fact, that pluripotency genes are expressed and cells within the foci possess large, highly condensated nuclei as well as clearly visible nucleoli (Fig. 4 B) indicate that these cells resemble embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells [33]. The absence of c-Kit expression further corroborates the EC-like nature of this lesion (Fig. 4 D).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Pluripotency maintaining and differentiation block show EC like nature of lesion.

(A–C) IHC staining of E16.5 embryonal testis. (A) SSEA1, (B) OCT3/4 and (C) TFAP2C. Scale bars: 50 µm. (B) Black arrow show cells with large, highly condensated nuclei as well as clearly visible nucleoli. (D) RT-PCR from RNA of microdissected SSEA-1 positive foci of E16.5 testes detecting Nanog, Sox2 and c-Kit. Comparison of microdissected SSEA-1 positive tissue (T) and SSEA-1 negative tissue (wt). Gapdh served as control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.g004

Teratoma Development in Male Mice Heterozygous for Nanos3

Since we identified Nanos3 as a direct transcriptional target of TFAP2C we addressed the question, whether Nanos3 heterozygous mice also develop tumors. Therefore, we bred the Nanos3-Cre knock-in allele (Nanos3tm2.1(cre)Ysa, MGI:4358405), which represents a null allele, [34] into the 129S2/Sv genetic background. Interestingly, from the fourth generation in 129S2/Sv 45% of Nanos3 heterozygous males showed teratoma formation (n = 20), with 5% showing bilateral tumors (Fig. 5 A), whereas control animals (n = 17) remained tumor-free. The histology of teratomas found in Nanos3 heterozygous animals is comparable to those of Tfap2c heterozygous mice (Fig. 5 B mesoderm; Fig. 5 C ectoderm; Fig. 5 D endoderm). These data suggest that teratoma susceptibility mediated by Tfap2c in 129S2/Sv genetic background is at least in part due to reduction of Nanos3. However, tumor incidence in Nanos3 heterozygous mice was lower and tumor progression was slower compared to Tfap2c heterozygous animals, arguing for additional targets of TFAP2C involved in GCC pathogenesis.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Teratoma development in Nanos3 heterozygous mice in 129S2/Sv genetic background.

(A) Percentage of total tumor incidence in Nanos3 heterozygous 129S2/Sv male mice. 45% (n = 20) showed testicular tumors. Red bar: bilateral cases (5%); blue bar: unilateral cases (40%). Testes of control (wt) and Nanos3 heterozygous (cre/+) mice (inset in A). (B–D) HE-staining of testicular teratomas of 4–8 month old mice. Tumors show tissues of all three germ layers: muscle (B), squamous epithelium (C) and respiratory epithelium (D). Scale bars: 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.g005

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the network of genes regulated by TFAP2C during germ cell development. Using an in vitro PGC differentiation protocol we observed deregulation of genes controlling cell cycle, somatic differentiation, epigenetic modification, pluripotency and germ cell maintenance and maturation upon loss of Tfap2c. ChIP analysis indicates direct binding of TFAP2C to Sfrp1, Dmrt1, Nanos3, c-Kit, Cdk6, Cdkn1a, Fgf4, Klf4, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l. Since some of the genes deregulated upon loss of Tfap2c are known to induce GCC in mice, we bred the Tfap2c mutation onto the 129S2/Sv genetic background. We demonstrate that reduction of TFAP2C protein level leads to persisting expression of pluripotency and cell cycle markers in foci representing precursor lesions. Consequently, incidence of GCC increases up to 85% in Tfap2c+/− males. Tumor susceptibility seems at least in part to be mediated by the TFAP2C target gene Nanos3 since Nanos3 heterozygous mice also develop GCC.

The microarray analysis identified a set of 455 deregulated genes in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs compared to the control. Interestingly, the deregulated genes in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs could be categorized in five groups representing diverse biological functions; somatic differentiation (category I), germ cell maintenance and maturation (category II), cell cycle (category III), pluripotency (category IV) and epigenetics (category V). In addition, ChIP analyses demonstrated that TFAP2C binds to regulatory elements of genes of all these categories. Thus, aside from the role as inhibitor of somatic differentiation [13], [35], TFAP2C seems to orchestrate all aspects of germ cell development instead of controlling only one category which, after deregulation would affect all others as a secondary effect.

Genes related to neural tube development/closure and central nervous system development are the GO terms significantly enriched in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs. Interestingly, we observed that tumors in Tfap2c+/− and Nanos3+/− testes predominantly consist of undifferentiated neuronal tissue (glia cells). In general, Stevens described that teratomas induced by grafting genital ridges consist predominantly of neural tissue [36]. This suggests that TFAP2C specifically inhibits neural tube development/closure and central nervous system development during germ cell development. Here, the direct transcriptional target Sfrp1 (Secreted frizzled-related protein 1) might be involved. It acts by antagonizing BMP-signaling in the caudal neural tube, resulting in neural tube closure defects [37]. This further strengthens the notion, that loss of TFAP2C leads to derepression of somatic programs, specially neuronal cell fate, and loss of germ cells in Tfap2c knockout mice [13].

In addition, loss of TFAP2C severely impairs the expression of genes involved in germ cell maintenance and maturation such as Stella, Dazl, Immp2l, Rhox4a, Rhox5, Rhox6, Rhox9, Dmrt1, c-Kit, Cxcr4 and Nanos3. Among them, Dmrt1, c-Kit and Nanos3 are direct target genes as determined by ChIP analyses. These data indicate that the lack of germ cell maturation markers is not simply a consequence of the derepressed somatic program. TFAP2C directly orchestrates the expression of the genes relevant for maintenance and maturation of PGCs/gonocytes up to E12.5, the last day expression of Tfap2c can be detected [13].

Lack of TFAP2C led to upregulation of cell cycle and pluripotency markers as well as epigenetic regulators. This indicates a role of TFAP2C to retain the capacity of germ cells to repress pluripotency, controlling the cell cycle and epigenetic reprogramming in the germ line. Here, Cdk6, Cdkn1a/p21, Fgf4, Klf4, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l could be shown to be direct TFAP2C targets, demonstrating that TFAP2C acts as a repressor for these genes. Upon loss of TFAP2C, cell cycle control genes such as Ccnd1 and Cdk6 are upregulated. Ccnd1 (Cyclin D1) is expressed in proliferating gonocytes and spermatogonia, suggesting a role for Ccnd1 in spermatogonial proliferation [38]. Ccnd1 expression is downregulated at E16.5. Interestingly, the percentage of germ cells, which continue to express Ccnd1 correlates with the risk of the respective mouse strain to develop teratoma [39]. It is known, that upregulation of Ccnd1 and its partner molecule Cdk6 lead to phosphorylation and inactivation of the retinoblastoma gene product (pRB), inducing expression of genes necessary for G1 to S-phase transit [40]. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Ccnd1 is sufficient to promote tumor formation by mediating growth factor independence and forces quiescent cells to reenter the cell cycle [40], [41]. Of note, a rapid progression from the G1 to S phase of the cell cycle facilitates the maintenance of pluripotency [42], [43]. Hence, we believe that Tfap2c−/− germ cells might fail to initiate the mitotic arrest and as a consequence do not differentiate further into gonocytes. Interestingly, the direct transcriptional target Cdkn1a/p21 is upregulated in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs and heterozygous E12.5 genital ridges. Direct binding to and repression of p21 has been described before using MCF-7 breast cancer cells [44]. While upregulation of the cell cycle repressor p21 seems counterintuitive with regard to the above reported upregulation of Ccnd1/Cdk6, it has to be noted that p21 is not only associated with cell cycle arrest [45], [46], [47] but also described as a regulator of p53-dependent and p53-independent apoptosis [48], [49]. Using Dead End−/− (Dnd1−/−) mice, testicular tumors were observed after repression of Bax-mediated apoptosis [50]. Here, we speculate that Tfap2c+/− germ cells are less prone to apoptosis due to elevated level of p21.

Loss of TFAP2C caused upregulation of the pluripotency associated genes Eras, Fgf4, Klf4 and Nr0b1. Fgf4 and Klf4 are direct transcriptional targets. In addition, it has been reported, that loss of the TFAP2C target gene Dmrt1 leads to upregulation of pluripotency markers Sox2, Nanog, Oct3/4 and E-cadherin in testes of E13.5 mice. Sox2 is a direct transcriptional target of DMRT1 [51]. In addition, we found three OCT3/4 dependent genes [52] Jam2, FoxD3 and Tdgf1 upregulated in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs. Interestingly, expression of Eras (ES-expressing ras) a gene related to teratoma formation in ESCs [53] was also upregulated. Again, such an upregulation is also found upon deletion of Dmrt1 [51], indicating that Dmrt1 as a downstream target of TFAP2C cooperates in balancing pluripotency and germ cell differentiation. We conclude that TFAP2C represses the transcription of pluripotency-associated genes in PGCs.

During germ cell migration loss of global DNA-methylation is observed [54]. Loss of DNA methylation in migrating PGCs occurs from approximately E8.0– E11.5 [55], [56]. TFAP2C seems to contribute to this process by direct binding to regulatory regions and repression of the methyltransferases Dnmt3b, Dnmt3l, and ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING finger domain 1 (Uhrf1). These genes are essential components of the de novo methylation machinery [11], [57], [58], [59]. After arrival at the genital ridges (E12.5), when Tfap2c is downregulated, the methylation levels are reinstalled [60]. Interestingly, embryonal carcinomas display high levels of DNMT3B and DNMT3L [61], [62], [63], [64]. Hence, the failure to repress the de novo methylation indicates, that these cells are prone to transform to EC-like cells. There is an association between DNA methylation and GCC susceptibility due to the fact that the global loss of DNA methylation process overlaps with the critical period for GCC formation [65].

We demonstrated here that Dmrt1 is a direct target gene of TFAP2C in PGCLCs. Interestingly, mice deficient for Dmrt1 are sterile and 90% develop GCC [51]. A recent study by Krentz et al. investigated teratoma susceptibility in Dmrt1fl/fl : Nanos3Cre/+ male mice [66]. Interestingly, the authors found Nanos3 haploinsufficiency to modify the susceptibility of Dmrt1 deficient male mice by elevating the tumor incidence, clearly demonstrating a role of Nanos3 in germ cell tumor development. However, in contrast to our results, the study of Krentz et al. could not demonstrate increased teratoma formation by Nanos3 heterozygosity on its own. As discussed there, this fact could be due to insufficient outbreeding to the 129Sv genetic background. Further, 129S6/Sv : 129S1/Sv mice were used instead of 129S2/Sv as used in our study. Strain specific variation in tumor susceptibility may have an influence on the experimental outcome.

Mice deficient for Pten and Dnd1 also display increased teratoma formation [67], [68], [69]. Since, we did not see downregulation of these genes in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs we hypothesize, that these genes act in different pathways. The observed upregulation of Pten in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs is most likely due to induction of somatic differentiation, since Pten has been associated with development of neuronal and synaptic structures [70].

In Tfap2c+/− male gonads foci with cells displaying continued expression of pluripotency markers Oct/4, Ssea1, Sox2 and Nanog were observed. In fact, this represents a hallmark critical for transformation of PGCs into embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells between E11.5–13.5 in mice [65]. Usually postmigratory PGCs downregulate pluripotency markers and enter mitotic arrest. However, EC cells show a block of germ cell differentiation and continued proliferation and expression of pluripotency markers also seen in human pediatric cancer.

In conclusion we provide evidence that the transcription factor TFAP2C orchestrates many aspects of the genetic network regulating germ cell development (Fig. 6). Maintenance and maturation of PGC are controlled by TFAP2C by repression of somatic differentiation, cell cycle, epigenetic remodeling, and pluripotency associated genes (Fig. 6). Furthermore, mice heterozygous for Tfap2c or its downstream target Nanos3 display an increase in GCC susceptibility.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Schematic of the genes and programs regulated by TFAP2C in primordial germ cells.

Black arrows indicate pathways transactivated and induced by TFAP2C and black lines with terminal bars indicate pathways repressed by TFAP2C during development of primordial germ cells. Genes listed in respective pathways indicate direct regulation as demonstrated by ChIP analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.g006

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Generation of Tfap2cctrl and Tfap2c−/− ESCs. (A) Immunofluorescence staining against TFAP2C and SSEA1 protein in ctrl and Tfap2c−/−ESCs (cell line #1 and #2). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst. Scale bars: 100 µm. (B) Genotyping of Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2cflox/flox and Blimp1mVenus/Tfap2c−/− ESC lines by PCR. (C) FACS analysis to identify Blimp1mVenus positive PGCLCs. Population P3 showing mVenus positive cells. 8.1% Blimp1mVenus positive cells in ctrl whereas 3.2% positive cells measured in Tfap2c−/− cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

In vitro differentiation of Tfap2c−/− and ctrl PGCLCs. (A) Brightfield pictures of #1-ctrl ESCs and after 1 and 2 days of in vitro differentiation into EpiLCs. EpiLCs show a flattened epithelial-like structure (A, middle). Scale bars: 100 µm (B) ESC and Epiblast markers were analysed by RT-PCR of RNA from #1-ctrl; #1-Tfap2c−/− and #2-ctrl; #2-Tfap2c−/− ESCs and EpiLCs. β-Actin served as control. (C) Brightfield pictures show #1-ctrl and #1-Tfap2c−/− EBs. PGCLC induction is indicated by Blimp1mVenus fluorescence. Scale bars: 100 µm (D) Graph showing the percentage and standard deviation of PGCLCs generation efficiency, measured by FACS for #1-ctrl (9.3%) and #2-ctrl (3%). Efficiency of PGCLC formation is lower in Tfap2c−/− cells (#1∶2.7% and #2∶1.5%). Significance * P≤0.05. (E) RT-PCR from RNA of #1-ctrl; #1-Tfap2c−/− and #2-ctrl; #2-Tfap2c−/− PGCLCs. Expression of early germ cell markers (Stella/Dppa3, Prdm14, Nanos3) is reduced in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs. As expected no signal was detected in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs. β-Actin served as control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.s002

(TIF)

Table S1.

Deregulated genes in Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs (Fold-change >1.5 in log2 scale).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.s003

(XLSX)

Table S2.

Deregulated genes in Tfap2c−/−ESCs (Fold-change >1.5 in log2 scale).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.s004

(XLSX)

Table S3.

Commonly deregulated genes in Tfap2c−/−ESCs and -PGCLCs (Fold-change >1.5 in log2 scale).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.s005

(XLSX)

Table S4.

Location of TFAP2/TFAP2C binding sites and primer sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.s006

(XLSX)

Data S1.

Gene Ontology analysis for >1.5 fold-change in log2 scale for Tfap2c−/−PGCLCs in comparison to ctrl PGCLCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071113.s010

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Azim Surani (Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom) for providing the StellaGFP ES cell lines, Mitinori Saitou (iCeMS, Kyoto University, Japan) and Liz Robertson (Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, United Kingdom) for Blimp1mVenus mice and Yumiko Saga and the Riken BRC for Nanos3Cre-mice. We thank all members of the lab for discussions and suggestions and Angela Egert, Gaby Beine, Susi Steiner and Barbara Reddemann for excellent technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JS NH SS SW DE HS. Performed the experiments: JS MAB NH SS SW AB DE. Analyzed the data: JS MAB NH DN HS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AZ. Wrote the paper: JS SS DN HS.

References

  1. 1. Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LHJ (2005) Testicular germ-cell tumours in a broader perspective. Nature Reviews Cancer 5: 210–222. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738984. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  2. 2. Schneider DT, Calaminus G, Koch S, Teske C, Schmidt P, et al.. (2004) Epidemiologic analysis of 1,442 children and adolescents registered in the German germ cell tumor protocols. Pediatric blood & cancer 42: 169–175. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14752882. Accessed 22 March 2013.
  3. 3. Motzer RJ, Amsterdam a, Prieto V, Sheinfeld J, Murty V V, et al. (1998) Teratoma with malignant transformation: diverse malignant histologies arising in men with germ cell tumors. The Journal of urology 159: 133–138 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9400455.
  4. 4. Ulbright TM (2005) Germ cell tumors of the gonads: a selective review emphasizing problems in differential diagnosis, newly appreciated, and controversial issues. Modern pathology: an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc 18 Suppl 2: S61–79. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15761467. Accessed 27 February 2013.
  5. 5. Pierce GB, Stevens LC, Nakane PK (1967) Ultrastructural Analysis of the Early Development of Teratocarinomas. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Vol(39): 755–773.
  6. 6. Lawson K a, Dunn NR, Roelen B a J, Zeinstra LM, Davis AM, et al. (1999) Bmp4 is required for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo. Genes & Development 13: 424–436 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=316469&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  7. 7. Ying Y, Liu XM, Marble a, Lawson K a, Zhao GQ (2000) Requirement of Bmp8b for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md) 14: 1053–1063 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10894154.
  8. 8. Ying Y, Zhao GQ (2001) Cooperation of endoderm-derived BMP2 and extraembryonic ectoderm-derived BMP4 in primordial germ cell generation in the mouse. Developmental biology 232: 484–492. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11401407. Accessed 24 March 2013.
  9. 9. Ohinata Y, Payer B, O’Carroll D, Ancelin K, Ono Y, et al.. (2005) Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature 436: 207–213. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15937476. Accessed 5 March 2013.
  10. 10. Kurimoto K, Yabuta Y, Ohinata Y, Shigeta M, Yamanaka K, et al.. (2008) Complex genome-wide transcription dynamics orchestrated by Blimp1 for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Genes & Development 22: 1617–1635. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2428060&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  11. 11. Yamaji M, Seki Y, Kurimoto K, Yabuta Y, Yuasa M, et al.. (2008) Critical function of Prdm14 for the establishment of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature Genetics 40: 1016–1022. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18622394. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  12. 12. Eckert D, Buhl S, Weber S, Jäger R, Schorle H (2005) The AP-2 family of transcription factors. Genome Biology 6: 246. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1414101&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  13. 13. Weber S, Eckert D, Nettersheim D, Gillis AJM, Schäfer S, et al.. (2010) Critical function of AP-2 gamma/TCFAP2C in mouse embryonic germ cell maintenance. Biology of Reproduction 82: 214–223. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19776388. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  14. 14. Yabuta Y, Kurimoto K, Ohinata Y, Seki Y, Saitou M (2006) Gene expression dynamics during germline specification in mice identified by quantitative single-cell gene expression profiling. Biology of Reproduction 75: 705–716. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870942. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  15. 15. Western PS, Miles DC, Van den Bergen J a, Burton M, Sinclair AH (2008) Dynamic regulation of mitotic arrest in fetal male germ cells. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 26: 339–347. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18024419. Accessed 2 March 2013.
  16. 16. Toyooka Y, Tsunekawa N, Takahashi Y, Matsui Y, Satoh M, et al. (2000) Expression and intracellular localization of mouse Vasa-homologue protein during germ cell development. Mechanisms of development 93: 139–149 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10781947.
  17. 17. Seligman J, Page DC (1998) The Dazh gene is expressed in male and female embryonic gonads before germ cell sex differentiation. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 245: 878–882 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9588208.
  18. 18. Seki Y, Yamaji M, Yabuta Y, Sano M, Shigeta M, et al.. (2007) Cellular dynamics associated with the genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming in migrating primordial germ cells in mice. Development (Cambridge, England) 134: 2627–2638. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17567665. Accessed 28 February 2013.
  19. 19. Hoei-Hansen CE, Nielsen JE, Almstrup K, Sonne SB, Graem N, et al. (2004) Transcription factor AP-2gamma is a developmentally regulated marker of testicular carcinoma in situ and germ cell tumors. Clinical Cancer Research 10: 8521–8530 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15623634.
  20. 20. Pauls K, Jäger R, Weber S, Wardelmann E, Koch A, et al.. (2005) Transcription factor AP-2gamma, a novel marker of gonocytes and seminomatous germ cell tumors. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer 115: 470–477. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15700319. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  21. 21. Ohinata Y, Sano M, Shigeta M, Yamanaka K, Saitou M (2008) A comprehensive, non-invasive visualization of primordial germ cell development in mice by the Prdm1-mVenus and Dppa3-ECFP double transgenic reporter. Reproduction Cambridge England 136: 503–514. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18583473. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  22. 22. Werling U, Schorle H (2002) Conditional inactivation of transcription factor AP-2gamma by using the Cre/loxP recombination system. Genesis (New York, NY: 2000) 32: 127–129. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11857798. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  23. 23. Kuckenberg P, Buhl S, Woynecki T, Van Fürden B, Tolkunova E, et al.. (2010) The transcription factor TCFAP2C/AP-2gamma cooperates with CDX2 to maintain trophectoderm formation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 30: 3310–3320. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20404091. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  24. 24. Hayashi K, Ohta H, Kurimoto K, Aramaki S, Saitou M (2011) Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. Cell 146: 519–532. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867411007719. Accessed 5 March 2013.
  25. 25. Payer B, Chuva De Sousa Lopes SM, Barton SC, Lee C, Saitou M, et al.. (2006) Generation of stella-GFP transgenic mice: a novel tool to study germ cell development. Genesis New York NY 2000 44: 75–83. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16437550. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  26. 26. Young JC, Dias VL, Loveland KL (2010) Defining the window of germline genesis in vitro from murine embryonic stem cells. Biology of Reproduction 82: 390–401. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19846600. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  27. 27. Nettersheim D, Gillis A, Biermann K, Looijenga LHJ, Schorle H (2011) The Seminoma Cell Line TCam-2 is Sensitive to HDAC Inhibitor Depsipeptide but Tolerates Various Other Chemotherapeutic Drugs and Loss of NANOG Expression. 1042: 1033–1042
  28. 28. Lim S, Janzer A, Becker A, Zimmer A, Schüle R, et al.. (2010) Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is highly expressed in ER-negative breast cancers and a biomarker predicting aggressive biology. Carcinogenesis 31: 512–520. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20042638. Accessed 28 February 2013.
  29. 29. Irizarry R a, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, et al. (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics (Oxford, England) 4: 249–264 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12925520.
  30. 30. Ashburner M, Ball C, Blake J, Botstein D (2000) Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature … 25: 25–29. Available: http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v25/n1/abs/ng0500_25.html. Accessed 7 April 2013.
  31. 31. Eckert D, Nettersheim D, Heukamp LC, Kitazawa S, Biermann K, et al.. (2008) TCam-2 but not JKT-1 cells resemble seminoma in cell culture. Cell and Tissue Research 331: 529–538. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18008088. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  32. 32. Ovcharenko I, Nobrega M a, Loots GG, Stubbs L (2004) ECR Browser: a tool for visualizing and accessing data from comparisons of multiple vertebrate genomes. Nucleic acids research 32: W280–6. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=441493&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 28 February 2013.
  33. 33. Rivers EN, Hamilton DW (1986) Morphologic analysis of spontaneous teratocarcinogenesis in developing testes of strain 129/Sv-ter mice. The American journal of pathology 124: 263–280 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1888294&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  34. 34. Suzuki H, Tsuda M, Kiso M, Saga Y (2008) Nanos3 maintains the germ cell lineage in the mouse by suppressing both Bax-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways. Developmental Biology 318: 133–142. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18436203. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  35. 35. Schäfer S, Anschlag J, Nettersheim D, Haas N, Pawig L, et al.. (2011) The role of BLIMP1 and its putative downstream target TFAP2C in germ cell development and germ cell tumours. International Journal of Andrology 34: e152–e158; discussion e158–e159. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21564135. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  36. 36. Stevens L (1964) Experimental production of testicular teratomas in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of …: 654–661. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC300322/. Accessed 7 April 2013.
  37. 37. Misra K, Matise MP (2010) A critical role for sFRP proteins in maintaining caudal neural tube closure in mice via inhibition of BMP signaling. Developmental biology 337: 74–83. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19850029. Accessed 5 April 2013.
  38. 38. Beumer TL, Roepers-Gajadien HL, Gademan IS, Kal HB, De Rooij DG (2000) Involvement of the D-type cyclins in germ cell proliferation and differentiation in the mouse. Biology of reproduction 63: 1893–1898 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11090462.
  39. 39. Heaney JD, Anderson EL, Michelson M V, Zechel JL, Conrad P a, et al.. (2012) Germ cell pluripotency, premature differentiation and susceptibility to testicular teratomas in mice. Development (Cambridge, England) 139: 1577–1586. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3317965&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  40. 40. Deshpande A, Sicinski P, Hinds PW (2005) Cyclins and cdks in development and cancer: a perspective. Oncogene 24: 2909–2915. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15838524. Accessed 13 March 2013.
  41. 41. Musgrove E a, Lee CS, Buckley MF, Sutherland RL (1994) Cyclin D1 induction in breast cancer cells shortens G1 and is sufficient for cells arrested in G1 to complete the cell cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 8022–8026 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=44537&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  42. 42. Filipczyk A a, Laslett AL, Mummery C, Pera MF (2007) Differentiation is coupled to changes in the cell cycle regulatory apparatus of human embryonic stem cells. Stem cell research 1: 45–60. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19383386. Accessed 10 March 2013.
  43. 43. Singh AM, Dalton S (2009) The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell stem cell 5: 141–149. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2909475&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 3 April 2013.
  44. 44. Williams CMJ, Scibetta AG, Friedrich JK, Canosa M, Berlato C, et al.. (2009) AP-2gamma promotes proliferation in breast tumour cells by direct repression of the CDKN1A gene. the The European Molecular Biology Organization Journal 28: 3591–3601. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2782101&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  45. 45. Deng C, Zhang P, Harper JW, Elledge SJ, Leder P (1995) Mice Lacking p21 c ∼ P7/wAF7 Undergo Normal Development, in Gl Checkpoint Control but Are Defective. 82: 875–884.
  46. 46. Iii ABN, Chen X, Smeets M, Hengst L, Prives C, et al.. (1998) Effects of p21 Cip1/Waf1 at Both the G 1/S and the G 2/M Cell Cycle Transitions: pRb Is a Critical Determinant in Blocking DNA Replication and in Preventing Endoreduplication Effects of p21 Cip1/Waf1 at Both the G 1/S and the G 2/M Cell Cycle.
  47. 47. Ogryzko V V, Wong P, Howard BH, Ogryzko V V, Wong P, et al.. (1997) WAF1 retards S-phase progression primarily by inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases. WAF1 Retards S-Phase Progression Primarily by Inhibition of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases. 17.
  48. 48. Helt C, Rancourt R (2001) p53-dependent induction of p21Cip1/WAF1/Sdi1 protects against oxygen-induced toxicity. Toxicological … 222: 214–222. Available: http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/63/2/214.short. Accessed 7 April 2013.
  49. 49. Javelaud D, Wietzerbin J, Delattre O, Besanc Ë (2000) Induction of p21 Waf1/Cip1 by TNFa requires NF-kB activity and antagonizes apoptosis in Ewing tumor cells. Oncogene 1: 61–68.
  50. 50. Cook MS, Coveney D, Batchvarov I, Nadeau JH, Capel B (2009) BAX-mediated cell death affects early germ cell loss and incidence of testicular teratomas in Dnd1(Ter/Ter) mice. Developmental biology 328: 377–383. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2689365&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 7 April 2013.
  51. 51. Krentz AD, Murphy MW, Kim S, Cook MS, Capel B, et al. (2009) The DM domain protein DMRT1 is a dose-sensitive regulator of fetal germ cell proliferation and pluripotency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 22323–22328 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2799724&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  52. 52. Sharov A a, Masui S, Sharova L V, Piao Y, Aiba K, et al.. (2008) Identification of Pou5f1, Sox2, and Nanog downstream target genes with statistical confidence by applying a novel algorithm to time course microarray and genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation data. BMC genomics 9: 269. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2424064&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 24 March 2013.
  53. 53. Takahashi K, Mitsui K, Yamanaka S (2003) Role of ERas in promoting tumour-like properties in mouse embryonic stem cells. 423: 541–545
  54. 54. Hackett J a, Zylicz JJ, Surani MA (2012) Parallel mechanisms of epigenetic reprogramming in the germline. Trends in genetics: TIG 28: 164–174. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22386917. Accessed 4 April 2013.
  55. 55. Sasaki H, Matsui Y (2008) Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nature Reviews Genetics 9: 129–140. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18197165. Accessed 27 February 2013.
  56. 56. Seki Y, Hayashi K, Itoh K, Mizugaki M, Saitou M, et al.. (2005) Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Developmental biology 278: 440–458. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15680362. Accessed 5 March 2013.
  57. 57. Kurimoto K, Yamaji M, Seki Y, Saitou M (2008) Specification of the germ cell lineage in mice ND ES NO ST ND ES OS NO ST. Cell Cycle 7: 3514–3518 Available: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/cbt/KurimotoCC7-22.pdf.
  58. 58. Bostick M, Kim JK, Estève P-O, Clark A, Pradhan S, et al.. (2007) UHRF1 plays a role in maintaining DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Science (New York, NY) 317: 1760–1764. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17673620. Accessed 5 March 2013.
  59. 59. Kato Y, Kaneda M, Hata K, Kumaki K, Hisano M, et al.. (2007) Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Human molecular genetics 16: 2272–2280. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17616512. Accessed 5 March 2013.
  60. 60. Liao H-F, Tai K-Y, Chen WS-C, Cheng LCW, Ho H-N, et al.. (2012) Functions of DNA methyltransferase 3-like in germ cells and beyond. Biology of the cell under the auspices of the European Cell Biology Organization 104: 571–587. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22671959. Accessed 1 March 2013.
  61. 61. Skotheim RI, Lind GE, Monni O, Nesland JM, Abeler VM, et al.. (2005) Differentiation of human embryonal carcinomas in vitro and in vivo reveals expression profiles relevant to normal development. Cancer research 65: 5588–5598. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15994931. Accessed 14 March 2013.
  62. 62. Sperger JM, Chen X, Draper JS, Antosiewicz JE, Chon CH, et al. (2003) Gene expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and human pluripotent germ cell tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 13350–13355 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=263817&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  63. 63. Almstrup K, Hoei-Hansen CE, Nielsen JE, Wirkner U, Ansorge W, et al.. (2005) Genome-wide gene expression profiling of testicular carcinoma in situ progression into overt tumours. British journal of cancer 92: 1934–1941. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2361756&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 10 June 2013.
  64. 64. Biermann K, Heukamp LC, Steger K, Zhou H, Franke FE, et al. (2007) Genome-wide expression profiling reveals new insights into pathogenesis and progression of testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer genomics & proteomics 4: 359–367 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17993720.
  65. 65. Stevens L (1967) Origin of testicular teratomas from primordial germ cells in mice. Journal of the National Cancer Institute: 549–552. Available: http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/4/549.short. Accessed 5 April 2013.
  66. 66. Krentz AD, Murphy MW, Zhang T, Sarver AL, Jain S, et al.. (2013) Interaction between DMRT1 function and genetic background modulates signaling and pluripotency to control tumor susceptibility in the fetal germ line. Developmental biology: 1–13. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23473982. Accessed 16 March 2013.
  67. 67. Kimura T (2003) Conditional loss of PTEN leads to testicular teratoma and enhances embryonic germ cell production. Development 130: 1691–1700. Available: http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/doi/10.1242/dev.00392. Accessed 7 April 2013.
  68. 68. Youngren KK, Coveney D, Peng X, Bhattacharya C, Schmidt LS, et al.. (2005) The Ter mutation in the dead end gene causes germ cell loss and testicular germ cell tumours. Nature 435: 360–364. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1421521&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 8 April 2013.
  69. 69. Noguchi T, Noguchi M (1985) A recessive mutation (ter) causing germ cell deficiency and a high incidence of congenital testicular teratomas in 129/Sv-ter mice. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 75: 385–392 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3860691.
  70. 70. Fraser MM, Bayazitov IT, Zakharenko SS, Baker SJ (2008) Phosphatase and tensin homolog, deleted on chromosome 10 deficiency in brain causes defects in synaptic structure, transmission and plasticity, and myelination abnormalities. Neuroscience 151: 476–488. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2278004&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 8 April 2013.