Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Simplified Method for Gene Knockout and Direct Screening of Recombinant Clones for Application in Paenibacillus polymyxa

A Simplified Method for Gene Knockout and Direct Screening of Recombinant Clones for Application in Paenibacillus polymyxa

  • Seong-Bin Kim, 
  • Salme Timmusk
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Paenibacillus polymyxa is a bacterium widely used in agriculture, industry, and environmental remediation because it has multiple functions including nitrogen fixation and produces various biologically active compounds. Among these compounds are the antibiotics polymyxins, and the bacterium is currently being reassessed for medical application. However, a lack of genetic tools for manipulation of P. polymyxa has limited our understanding of the biosynthesis of these compounds.

Methods and Principal Findings

To facilitate an understanding of the genetic determinants of the bacterium, we have developed a system for marker exchange mutagenesis directly on competent cells of P. polymyxa under conditions where homologous recombination is enhanced by denaturation of the suicide plasmid DNA. To test this system, we targeted P. polymyxa α-and β-amylase genes for disruption. Chloramphenicol or erythromycin resistance genes were inserted into the suicide plasmid pGEM7Z-f+ (Promega). To mediate homologous recombination and replacement of the targeted genes with the antibiotic resistance genes nucleotide sequences of the α-and β-amylase genes were cloned into the plasmid flanking the antibiotic resistance genes.

Conclusions

We have created a simple system for targeted gene deletion in P. polymyxa E681. We propose that P. polymyxa isogenic mutants could be developed using this system of marker exchange mutagenesis. α-and β-amylase genes provide a useful tool for direct recombinant screening in P. polymyxa.

Introduction

Paenibacillus polymyxa (formerly Bacillus polymyxa), the type species of Paenibacillus, is considered to be a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) with a broad host plant range [1][5]. P. polymyxa is widespread in the soil and is widely used in agriculture, industry, and environmental remediation because of its multiple functions [1], [2], [4][18]. Owing to its production of desiccation- and heat-resistant endospores, and to its intrinsic resistance to several fungicides and herbicides, it has high potential to be applied in agriculture as a biocontrol agent. The genomes of different strains of P. polymyxa have been sequenced by four groups [4], [19], [20] and Timmusk et al. (manuscript submitted for publication). The P. polymyxa E681 genome is composed of one circular chromosome of 5.4 Mb [19]. The genome of strain SC2 is composed of a circular 5 Mb chromosome and a 510 kb plasmid, and M1 is composed of 5.8 Mb chromosome and 360 kb plasmid [4]. The sequences reveal that P. polymyxa isolates have potential to produce various economically important biologically active compounds; however, a lack of genetic tools available for manipulation of P. polymyxa has hindered our understanding of the biosynthetic steps involved in natural product synthesis. Only two very important antibiotic compounds, fusaricidins and polymyxins, have been successfully mutagenized in the bacterium. This was performed by targeted mutagenesis protocol based on genomic libraries of PKB1 and E681 [21][23]. Direct homologous recombination between introduced DNA and P. polymyxa corresponding chromosomal loci has not been demonstrated previously probably due to low efficiency of transformation or to the low efficiency of homologous recombination events. Library-based mutagenesis is a costly and time-consuming approach and not realistic when a number of genes have to be mutated simultaneously. In this study α- and β-amylase genes were targeted for inactivation to test the mutagenesis system we developed.

The enzyme α-amylase randomly hydrolyzes α-1,4-linkages in both amylose and amylopectin chains. The enzyme β-amylase hydrolyzes alternate β-1,4 linkages from the ends of amylose and amylopectin chains. [24]. Although α-amylases are widely distributed in various kinds of living organisms, only certain plants and microorganisms are known to produce β-amylases [25]. Some microorganisms produce also glucoamylase which hydrolyzes α-1,3, α-1,4, and α-1,6 linkages. Because glucoamylase is less Efficient than α-amylase in cleaving α-1,4 linkages, it is usually used in conjunction with α-amylase [24].

Here we report on successful gene replacement in P. polymyxa E681 cells under conditions where homologous recombination is enhanced by denaturation of the suicide plasmid DNA. Alpha -and -beta-amylase genes were targeted to test the system. The genes provide a useful tool for direct recombinant screening in P. polymyxa.

Materials and Methods

1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Condition

Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 was isolated from the rhizosphere of winter barley [26]. The primers for this experiment are described in Table 1. Escherichia coli DH5alpha cells (Invitrogen) acted as host for recombinant plasmids and were cultivated at 37°C on LB agar. Bacillus subtilis JH642 (Bacillus Genetic Stock Centre, BGSC; Ohio) was used for the complementation experiment. B. subtilis and P. polymyxa E681 were grown in half strength Tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Difco) at 30°C. Brain heart Infusion medium (Difco) containing 10% sucrose was used for the transformation of P. polymyxa E681. The extraction of plasmid and chromosomal DNA were performed according to standard procedures [27]. For antibiotic selection the media were supplemented with 5 µg/ml chloramphenicol, 1 µg/ml erythromycin and 100 µg/ml ampicillin, final concentration.

2. Construction of the Suicide Vectors

A vector for targeted mutagenesis of P. polymyxa genes by replacement with a chloramphenicol or erythromycin resistance cassette was constructed from the plasmid pGEM7Z-f+ (Promega) which replicates in E. coli but not in P. polymyxa (Fig. 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the construction of the shuttle plasmids pGEM7Zα-amy and pGEM7Zβ-amy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068092.g001

Cloning strategy for the pGEM7Z α-amy vector for α-amylase gene replacement.

The cat cassette encoding chloramphenicol resistance was constructed by PCR amplification using primers CatF and CatR from pDG1661 (BGSC, Ohio) and was then ligated into pGem7Zf(+) via EcoRI and BamHI cleavage sites resulting in plasmid pGEM7Zf Cat. Subsequently, 760 bp and 870 bp fragments of the flanking regions of the α-amy gene were amplified by PCR from the E681 chromosomal DNA using α-amy-FF – α-amy-FR and α-amy-RF – α-amy RR primer pairs resulting in PCR products A and B respectively. Fragments A and B were then introduced into pGem7Zf cat (+) using the NsiI and BamHI, and XbaI and ApaI restriction sites, respectively, resulting in plasmid pGEM7Za-amy.

Cloning strategy for the pGEM7Z β-amy vector for β-amylase gene replacement.

The pGEM7zf Cat cat gene was replaced with the gene encoding erythromycin resistance (erm) using primers EmyF and EmyF. Then, 742 bp and 794 bp fragments of the flanking regions of β-amy gene were amplified by PCR from the E681 chromosomal DNA using β-amy –FF/β-amy -FR and β-amy –RF/β-amy RR primer pairs resulting in PCR products C and D respectively. The fragments were inserted to into pGem7Zf erm NsiI and BamHI, and XbaI and ApaI restriction sites resulting in plasmid pGEM7Zfb-amy.

3. Transformation Conditions for P. polymyxa E681

Transformation of P. polymyxa was performed by electroporation. In order to prepare competent cells, a single P. polymyxa E681 colony was picked from 1/2 TSA solid medium and cultured in BHIS broth [27] at 30°C and 200 rpm for 15 hours. Two ml of the pre-culture was inoculated into 200 mL of BHIS and cultured at 30°C, 200 rpm. When the cells reached an OD600 of 0.5, the bacterial growth was interrupted by placing the culture on ice for 10 min and centrifuged at 5000×g for 10 min at 4°C. After washing the cells twice with cold SM buffer [27], the competent cells were resuspended in SM buffer. Electroporation was performed using a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.).

It is known that homologous recombination may be strongly stimulated by denaturation of double-stranded circular DNA. DNA for electroporation was prepared after slightly modified protocols of Oh and Chater (1997) and Hinds et al (1999) [28][30] Briefly, DNA was denatured in a total volume of 20 ml containing 0.2 mM EDTA 0.2 M NaOH for 20 min at 37°C. Two µl of 3 M sodium acetate, pH 4.8, was added, and the mixture was purified using Qiaquick mini-columns (Qiagen). DNA was eluted with 18 ml of H2O, and kept on ice before electroporation. For UV treatment, 18 ml of DNA solution in a droplet on a plate was subjected to 2 50, 100 or 250 mJ cm−2 UV irradiation in a UV chamber (CL1000 UV crosslinker UVP Inc.), and DNA was kept on ice before electroporation. Competent cells were mixed with DNA, transferred to 2 mm cuvettes, and placed on ice for at least 5 min. The sample was pulsed with a voltage of 6.25 kV cm−1, a capacitance of 25 µF, and a resistance of 200 Ω. One ml of 30°C pre-warmed BHIS was added and the cell suspension was incubated at 30°C for 3 h.

Transformants were selected on respective antibiotics plates and cassette insertion was confirmed by PCR with primers flanking the sequences used in the mutagenesis vector.

4. Complementation in Bacillus subtilis JH642

As only partial complementation of amylase genes in P. polymyxa was achieved, the complementation was performed in B. subtilis JH642. For this purpose, the α-amylase gene of B. subtilis JH642 was first deleted by using pDG1662 integration plasmid (BGSC, Ohio). For the complementation of the α-amylase gene of P. polymyxa E681, the α-amylase gene was amplified with C-α-amyF and C-α-amyR then cloned into pHPS9 (BGSC, Ohio), an E.coli/Bacillus shuttle vector, via the NdeI and BamHI restriction sites. For complementation of the β-amylase gene, the full structural gene of β-amylase was amplified with C-β-amyF and C-β-amyR. This fragment was cloned into pHPS9 using the NdeI and BamHI restriction sites. These plasmids carrying amylase genes were introduced into B. subtilis by natural uptake. A fresh single colony cultivated overnight was inoculated in Spizizen’s medium [27] with 200 rpm at 37°C for 5.5 hours and then mixed with plasmid DNA for 1 hour; subsequently colonies were selected on LB agar containing chloramphenicol.

5. Measurement of Starch Concentration in Media

Production of α- and β- amylase was quantified as follows. Each of the strains was inoculated in half strength tryptic soy broth (TSB) containing 1% soluble starch (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# S2004). An aliquot of the culture was removed at each measurement time and centrifuged at 8,000×g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was diluted ten times with distilled water and 150 µl of diluted supernatant was added to 600 µl of reaction buffer (50 mM Tris Cl pH 6.8, 25 mM CaCl2 2H2O), followed by 300 µl of detection solution (0.01% w/v I2 and 0.1% w/v KI in 1 M HCl). The starch concentration was measured by changes in the optical density at 620 nm.

Results and Discussion

There is considerable interest in P. polymyxa because this bacterium produces various biologically active compounds [1], [2], [21], [31], [32]. However, the lack of an efficient direct gene manipulation system for this organism has hampered further genetic studies. Genome analysis depends largely on the ability to assign functions to the various putative ORFs identified by DNA sequencing. For a given gene, the most straightforward approach is to create a knockout in that gene and to characterize the phenotype of the mutant. In order to verify the roles of P. polymyxa genes fusA and pmxE in fusaricidin and polymyxin biosynthesis, respectively, their genome library based targeted mutations were created [21][23]. Construction of a vector for mutagenesis was based on the lambda red recombinase system developed by Datsenko and Wanner for use in E. coli and adapted for mutation in many other bacteria [33], [34]. P. polymyxa genes were inserted into a cosmid vector and introduced into E. coli for insertion of a PCR-amplified antibiotic resistance cassette to target the P. polymyxa gene by homologous recombination. Both conjugation and electroporation procedures were used to introduce the altered vector in to P. polymyxa for gene disruption [14], [21]. In contrast to these methods, our gene knockout vectors were inserted directly into E681 competent cells. Previous attempts to carry out gene targeting by homologous recombination directly into P. polymyxa have been unsuccessful. We have applied a method used in mycobacteria and Streptomyces spp. [29], [30] This methodology exploits the organism’s endogenous machinery of DNA repair and/or recombination to integrate DNA at a target locus as directed by DNA sequence homology. UV-irradiated or alkali-denatured DNA molecules may provide a more recombinogenic substrate for DNA repair and/or recombination systems of the bacterial cell. Introduction of altered DNA into the bacterial cells by electroporation resulted in 20 to 100 transformants per µg DNA from which 10 to 60% were allelic exchange colonies. The stimulatory effect of homologous recombination was maximum after DNA UV irradiation at 50 mJ cm−2.The mutated bacterial colonies exclusively carried flat phase variation. Phase variation is an adaptive process by which bacteria undergo frequent and reversible phenotypic changes resulting from genetic alterations at specific loci of their genomes. This process is known to be crucial for the survival of various pathogens and facilitates adaptation of bacterial populations to stressful environments [35][37]. Phase variation in P. polymyxa is revealed as two different colony morphologies: bold opaque colonies (B type) and flat colonies (F type). Similar colony morphology has been observed e.g. in P. aeruginosa. The mechanism of phase variation includes site specific recombination, gene conversion, epigenetic modifications, nested DNA inversions and slipped strand mispairings but could also involve recently reported new mechanisms [36], [38]. Introduction of altered DNA into the bacterial cell may recruit the recombination machinery for initiating homologous pairing and strand exchange. The stimulation of homologous recombination by UV may be caused by the production of a gapped duplex substrate following nucleotide excision repair (by UvrABC). This has been shown to be an effective recombination substrate owing to the rapid formation of RecA filaments [28] It is likely that such a genetic arrangements can lead to F colony type preference in E681 during the mutagenesis. The direct mechanism of P. polymyxa phase variation remains to be elucidated. Yet it is already clear that on and off switching of phenotype expression is involved when manipulating the bacterial populations.

In order to demonstrate the functionality of this gene knockout system, deletion mutations of P. polymyxa E681 α-amylase and β-amylase genes PPE_02348 and PPE_04705 were created. In addition to testing the system the genes encode enzymes that participate in starch degradation and hence provide a system for direct screening for various heterologous fragments to the genes to P. polymyxa on starch clearing plates. For deletion of the α -amylase gene, its structural gene flanking regions were cloned into a pGEM7Zderivative containing the cat gene which inactivates chloramphenicol. For the β-amylase gene deletion the gene flanking regions were cloned into a pGEM7Z derivative containing the erm gene which encodes erythromycin resistance (Fig. 1A and B). After transformation, it was found that the α-amylase mutant has reduced amylolytic activity forming an almost identical starch clearance zone as the wild type (Fig. 2). This is in contrast to the results obtained with the β-amylase gene which generated a clearly reduced zone of clearance on starch plates (Fig. 2). Double mutants show full inhibition of starch degradation on the plate assay confirming that both genes are required for starch degradation in P. polymyxa (Fig. 2). Our results clearly show that upon insertion of heterologous fragments (in our case cat and erm genes) into the α-and β-amylase genes their amylolytic activity was disrupted. β-amylase and double mutant show distinct differences in starch clearance on plate assays. These phenotypes therefore allow the direct screening of recombinant clones. Further, the identification of the recombinant clones can be performed directly on the transformation plates by a simple assay. In contrast to other screening possibilities commonly employed for positive differentiation of recombinants, starch clearance plates provide excellent results at modest costs.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Starch clearance plate assay to detect amylolytic activity of (A).

P. polymyxa E681 (B). P. polymyxa E681, Δ α-amy:: cat (C). P. polymyxa E681, Δ β-amy::erm (D). P. polymyxa E681, Δ α-amy:: cat, Δ β-amy::erm. Note that (D). P. polymyxa E681, Δ α-amy:: cat, Δ β-amy::erm has lost the amylolytic activity indicating that both genes are required for starch degradation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068092.g002

To confirm disruption of the amylase genes, we studied the dynamics of P. polymyxa E681 starch degradation in ½ TSB over 60 h (Fig. 3A–D). The results confirm that amylolytic activity is only initiated at the beginning of stationary phase of bacterial growth and that α- and β-amylase deletions do not influence bacterial growth in TSB medium. The liquid assay results agree with the starch clearance plate assays results for the first 20 h. After that time β-amylase mutant starch degradation ability increases, rapidly depleting the starch by 50 h. Double mutant starch degradation ability remain low for over 32 hours after which it rapidly increases and forms a pattern nearly identical to the wild-type and the α- and β-amylase mutants after 50 h. These results suggest that enzymes other than α- and β-amylase are involved in starch degradation of P. polymyxa during late stationary phase. The complementation of amylase genes was attempted in P. polymyxa E681derivatives using pHPS9, an E.coli/Bacillus shuttle vector. The α- amylase gene was amplified with C-α-amyF and C-α-amyR primers and β- amylase with C-β-amyF and C-β-amyR primers. The amplified products were inserted into pHPS9 between NdeI and BamHI restriction sites. Yet only 25% starch degradation with complementation experiment was achieved. It is likely that the p59 promoter driving the expression of cloned amylase genes in pHPS9 had a reduced activity in P. polymyxa. Hence, the complementation experiment with amylase genes was performed in B. subtilis JH642. Initially the JH642 α-amylase gene was deleted and replaced by P. polymyxa α- and β-amylase genes (Fig. 4). However, only insertion of both genes restored the full starch degradation pattern of JH642 (Fig. 4 C and D).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Starch degradation profiles in liquid assays of (A).

P. polymyxa E681 (B). P. polymyxa E681, Δ α-amy:: cat (alpha) (C). P. polymyxa E681, Δ β-amy::erm (beta) (D). P. polymyxa E681, Δ α-amy:: cat, Δ β-amy::erm (double). Note that amylolytic activity of beta amylase mutant is lost during the 20 h of growth and 32 h in case of double mutant (D) in ½ TSB medium.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068092.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Starch clearance plate assay to detect complementation of amylolytic activity of (A).

B. subtilis JH642 (B). B. subtilis JH642, Δ α-amy:: cat (C). B. subtilis JH642, Δ α-amy:: cat, pHPS9-α-amylase gene (D). B. subtilis JH642, Δ α-amy:: cat, pHPS9- β-amylase gene. Note that α- and β- amylase complementation restores full amylase production (D).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068092.g004

While the function of many genes in the P. polymyxa genome may be inferred from sequence similarities, the functions of the majority of the genes are unknown. In this study, we developed a new genetic tool for P. polymyxa that enables efficient and less costly creation of gene knockouts. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported use of gene replacement by homologous recombination based on P. polymyxa cells. Likewise we show that the α- and β-amylase genes provide a valuable genetic marker that enables rapid direct screening of heterologous genes in P. polymyxa cells. Even though this study focused on the specific insertional mutagenesis of α - and β-amylase genes, the technique described could be used more generally for mutagenesis of various genes in P. polymyxa. The isolation of mutants deficient in important functions would be extremely useful in elucidating the genes that contribute to the beneficial effect of P. polymyxa.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Seung-Hwan Park is gratefully acknowledged for providing E681 strain and help with initial stages of work. We are indebted to Dr. D. Clapham for valuable discussions and to Drs. B.R. Glick and C. Patten for critically reading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SBK ST. Performed the experiments: SBK ST. Analyzed the data: SBK ST. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ST. Wrote the paper: ST.

References

  1. 1. Timmusk S, Timmusk K, Behers L (2013) Rhizobacterial plant drought stress tolerance enhancement. J Food Security V1: p 10–16.
  2. 2. Timmusk S, Nevo E (2011) Plant root associated biofilms. In: Maheshwari DK, editor. Bacteria in agrobiology (vol 3) : Plant nutrient management. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  3. 3. Timmusk S (2003) Mechanism of action of the plant growth promoting bacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa [PhD thesis]. Uppsala: Uppsala University. 1–54 p.
  4. 4. Niu B, Rueckert C, Blom J, Wang Q, Borriss R (2011) The genome of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa M-1 contains nine sites dedicated to nonribosomal synthesis of lipopeptides and polyketides. J Bacteriol 193: 5862–5863.
  5. 5. Raza W, Yang W, Shen Q-R (2008) Paenibacillus polymyxa: antibiotics, hydrolytic enzymes and hazard assessment. J Plant Pathology 90: 419–430.
  6. 6. Timmusk S, Behers L (2012) Rhizobacterial application for sustainable water management on the areas of limited water resources. Irrigation and Drainage Systems Engineering 12: https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9768.1000e4111
  7. 7. Timmusk S, Paalme V, Pavlicek T, Bergquist J, Vangala A, et al. (2011) Bacterial distribution in the rhizosphere of wild barley under contrasting microclimates. PLoS One 6: e17968.
  8. 8. Timmusk S, van West P, Gow NA, Huffstutler RP (2009) Paenibacillus polymyxa antagonizes oomycete plant pathogens Phytophthora palmivora and Pythium aphanidermatum. J Appl Microbiol 106: 1473–1481.
  9. 9. Haggag WM, Timmusk S (2008) Colonization of peanut roots by biofilm-forming Paenibacillus polymyxa initiates biocontrol against crown rot disease. J Appl Microbiol 104: 961–969.
  10. 10. Timmusk S, Wagner EG (1999) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa induces changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression: a possible connection between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 12: 951–959.
  11. 11. Park SY, Choi SK, Kim J, Oh TK, Park SH (2012) Efficient production of polymyxin in the surrogate host Bacillus subtilis by introducing a foreign ectB gene and disrupting the abrB gene. Appl Environ Microbiol.
  12. 12. Phi QT, Park YM, Seul KJ, Ryu CM, Park SH, et al. (2010) Assessment of root-associated Paenibacillus polymyxa groups on growth promotion and induced systemic resistance in pepper. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20: 1605–1613.
  13. 13. Phi QT, Oh SH, Park YM, Park SH, Ryu CM, et al. (2008) Isolation and characterization of transposon-insertional mutants from Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 altering the biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Curr Microbiol 56: 524–530.
  14. 14. Lai S, Tabacchioni S (2009) Ecology and biotechnological potential of Paenibacillus polymyxa: a minireview. Indian J Microbiol 49: 2–10.
  15. 15. Heulin T, Berge O, Mavingui P, Gouzou L, Hebbar KP, et al.. (1994) Bacillus polymyxa and Rahnella aquatilis, the dominant N2-fixing bacteria associated with wheat rhizosphere in french soils. Eur J Soil Biol 3035–41.
  16. 16. Timmusk S, Nicander B, Granhall U, Tillberg E (1999) Cytokinin production by Paenibacillus polymyxa. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 1847–1852.
  17. 17. Shaheen M, Li J, Ross AC, Vederas JC, Jensen SE (2011) Paenibacillus polymyxa PKB1 produces variants of polymyxin B-type antibiotics. Chem Biol 18: 1640–1648.
  18. 18. Li J, Jensen SE (2008) Nonribosomal biosynthesis of fusaricidins by Paenibacillus polymyxa PKB1 involves direct activation of a D-amino acid. Chem Biol 15: 118–127.
  19. 19. Kim JF, Jeong H, Park SY, Kim SB, Park YK, et al. (2010) Genome sequence of the polymyxin-producing plant-probiotic rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa E681. J Bacteriol 192: 6103–6104.
  20. 20. Ma M, Wang C, Ding Y, Li L, Shen D, et al. (2011) Complete genome sequence of Paenibacillus polymyxa SC2, a strain of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacterium with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. J Bacteriol 193: 311–312.
  21. 21. Choi SK, Park SY, Kim R, Kim SB, Lee CH, et al. (2009) Identification of a polymyxin synthetase gene cluster of Paenibacillus polymyxa and heterologous expression of the gene in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 191: 3350–3358.
  22. 22. Choi SK, Park SY, Kim R, Lee CH, Kim JF, et al. (2008) Identification and functional analysis of the fusaricidin biosynthetic gene of Paenibacillus polymyxa E681. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 365: 89–95.
  23. 23. Li J, Beatty PK, Shah S, Jensen SE (2007) Use of PCR-targeted mutagenesis to disrupt production of fusaricidin-type antifungal antibiotics in Paenibacillus polymyxa. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 3480–3489.
  24. 24. Glick B, Pasternack J (2005) Molecular Biotechnology. Principles and Applications of Recombinant DNA. NY: ASM Press.
  25. 25. Friedberg F, Rhodes C (1986) Cloning and characterization of the beta-amylase gene from Bacillus polymyxa. J Bacteriol 165: 819–824.
  26. 26. Ryu C-M, Kim J, Choi O, Park S-Y, Park S-H, et al.. (2005) Nature of a Root-Associated Paenibacillus polymyxa from fieldgrown winter barley in Korea. J Microbiol Biotechnol: 984–991.
  27. 27. Harwood C, Cutting S (1990) Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  28. 28. Friedberg E, Walker G, Siede W, Wood R, Schultz R (2009) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis; Friedberg E, editor: ASM Press.
  29. 29. Hinds J, Mahenthiralingam E, Kempsell KE, Duncan K, Stokes RW, et al. (1999) Enhanced gene replacement in mycobacteria. Microbiology 145 (Pt 3): 519–527.
  30. 30. Oh SH, Chater KF (1997) Denaturation of circular or linear DNA facilitates targeted integrative transformation of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): possible relevance to other organisms. J Bacteriol 179: 122–127.
  31. 31. Timmusk S, Paalme V, Pavlicek T, Bergquist J, Vangala A, et al. (2011) Bacterial distribution in the rhizosphere of wild barley under contrasting microclimates. PLoS ONE 6(3): e17968
  32. 32. Phi QT, Park YM, Ryu CM, Park SH, Ghim SY (2008) Functional identification and expression of indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase from Paenibacillus polymyxa E681. J Microbiol Biotechnol 18: 1235–1244.
  33. 33. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 6640–6645.
  34. 34. Gust B, Challis GL, Fowler K, Kieser T, Chater KF (2003) PCR-targeted Streptomyces gene replacement identifies a protein domain needed for biosynthesis of the sesquiterpene soil odor geosmin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 1541–1546.
  35. 35. Vial L, Groleau MC, Lamarche MG, Filion G, Castonguay-Vanier J, et al. (2010) Phase variation has a role in Burkholderia ambifaria niche adaptation. ISME J 4: 49–60.
  36. 36. Henderson IR, Owen P, Nataro JP (1999) Molecular switches–the ON and OFF of bacterial phase variation. Mol Microbiol 33: 919–932.
  37. 37. Bayliss CD, Palmer ME (2012) Evolution of simple sequence repeat-mediated phase variation in bacterial genomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1267: 39–44.
  38. 38. Metruccio MM, Pigozzi E, Roncarati D, Berlanda Scorza F, Norais N, et al. (2009) A novel phase variation mechanism in the meningococcus driven by a ligand-responsive repressor and differential spacing of distal promoter elements. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000710.