Aedes albopictus, a vector of Dengue and Chikungunya viruses, is a robust invasive species in both tropical and temperate environments. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate gene expression and biological processes including embryonic development, innate immunity and infection. While a number of miRNAs have been discovered in some mosquitoes, no comprehensive effort has been made to characterize them from different developmental stages from a single species. Systematic analysis of miRNAs in Ae. albopictus will improve our understanding of its basic biology and inform novel strategies to prevent virus transmission. Between 10–14 million Illumina sequencing reads per sample were obtained from embryos, larvae, pupae, adult males, sugar-fed and blood-fed adult females. A total of 119 miRNA genes represented by 215 miRNA or miRNA star (miRNA*) sequences were identified, 15 of which are novel. Eleven, two, and two of the newly-discovered miRNA genes appear specific to Aedes, Culicinae, and Culicidae, respectively. A number of miRNAs accumulate predominantly in one or two developmental stages and the large number that showed differences in abundance following a blood meal likely are important in blood-induced mosquito biology. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the targets of all Ae. albopictus miRNAs provides a useful starting point for the study of their functions in mosquitoes. This study is the first systematic analysis of miRNAs based on deep-sequencing of small RNA samples of all developmental stages of a mosquito species. A number of miRNAs are related to specific physiological states, most notably, pre- and post-blood feeding. The distribution of lineage-specific miRNAs is consistent with mosquito phylogeny and the presence of a number of Aedes-specific miRNAs likely reflects the divergence between the Aedes and Culex genera.
Citation: Gu J, Hu W, Wu J, Zheng P, Chen M, James AA, et al. (2013) miRNA Genes of an Invasive Vector Mosquito, Aedes albopictus. PLoS ONE 8(7): e67638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067638
Editor: Kristin Michel, Kansas State University, United States of America
Received: January 14, 2013; Accepted: May 20, 2013; Published: July 1, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Gu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work is supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U0832004) and GDUPS (2009) to Xiaoguang Chen, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI070854) and NSFC (30828027) to Zhijian Tu and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U54AI065359) to Anthony A. James. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are ∼22 nucleotides (nt) in length and modulate gene expression by targeting cognate mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression. miRNAs are distributed widely in metazoans and plants and are involved in the regulation of many biological processes including apoptosis, cancer, embryonic development, immunity and infection –. miRNAs also may have a role in mosquito responses to infection by malaria parasite and arboviruses , . Many miRNAs are transcribed from independent promoters to generate the primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs), which could contain one or more regions of complementary bases that form secondary structures (hairpins). These hairpins are recognized and liberated by the Microprocessor complex to make precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs). Pre-miRNAs are exported to the cytosol and processed further by Dicer to make the ∼22-nt miRNA:miRNA* duplex. The duplex is separated by a helicase and the single-stranded miRNA is loaded into the RISC complex., The miRNA* strand is normally rapidly degraded . Other miRNAs reside in introns of genes and their biogenesis is independent of the Microprocessor complex , .
Deep-sequencing coupled with bioinformatic analyses has produced comprehensive catalogs of miRNAs in model organisms. For example, there are 171 miRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster discovered in a large number of samples derived from different developmental stages and tissues and from analysis of 12 Drosophila genomes , , . Deep-sequencing efforts to uncover miRNAs in mosquitoes have been limited to specific developmental stages or cell lines and the number discovered is relatively low compared to D. melanogaster. A small number of miRNAs were verified experimentally in two Anopheles mosquito species , . Ninety-eight miRNA genes that produce 86 distinct miRNAs were discovered in Aedes aegypti, mostly by small-scale 454 sequencing of embryo and midgut samples . A total of 65 and 77 miRNAs were discovered following Illumina sequencing of small RNAs from an Ae. albopictus cultured cell line and blood-fed Culex quinquefasciatus females, respectively .While most of these miRNAs are conserved across divergent species, 11 distinct miRNA genes are found only in mosquitoes, some of which are restricted to certain taxonomic groups , .
Here we report discovery of 119 miRNA genes through deep-sequencing of small RNAs isolated from multiple developmental stages of Ae. albopictus, of which 15 are novel and appear to be only in mosquitoes. We chose Ae. albopictus for this study because of its rapid expansion in world-wide distribution and its emerging importance as a vector for Dengue and Chikungunya viruses . Our analysis has doubled the number of known mosquito-specific miRNAs, uncovered miRNAs showing stage-specific and blood-meal-regulated expression profiles, and provided the basis for the investigations of the function and evolution of mosquito miRNAs.
Materials and Methods
All vertebrate animals were housed and handled in strict accordance with the guidelines of the institutional and national Committees of Animal Use and Protection. All experimental procedures on mice were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Southern Medical University (Permit Number: SCXK 2006-0015).
The CDC (Guangdong, China) strain of Aedes albopictus originated in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, PRC, and was established the laboratory in 1981. All mosquitoes were maintained in humidified incubators at 25±1°C on a 12 hour light:dark cycle.
Aedes albopictus Sample Preparation for Illumina Sequencing
Embryos were collected 0–24 hours after egg deposition by placing a damp collection cup within a cage. Larval samples were collected at each instar and combined. Pupal samples were collected from a pool of varied ages. Male and female adults were collected five days post-emergence. Three- to five-day old adult females were fed on mouse blood and collected at 1, 3 and 5 days after feeding and pooled. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen). Approximately 20 µg of the total RNAs were separated on a 15% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and small RNAs ranging up to 30 nt in length were excised and sent to the Beijing Genome Institute Inc. for sequencing and analysis. The small RNAs were ligated sequentially to 5′- and 3′-end RNA adapters. The small RNA molecules were amplified for 17 cycles using the adaptor primers and fragments ∼90 nt in length (small RNA+adaptors) were isolated from agarose gels. The purified DNA was used directly for cluster generation and sequencing analysis using the Illumina Genome Analyzer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Clean reads were processed for computational analysis after removing adaptor sequences and contaminated reads. ). All primary sequence read data have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) short-read archive (accession number SRA060684).
After removing low-quality sequences determined by inspection of chromatographs, tags with lengths ranging from 18–30 nt were selected for further analysis. The subsequent procedures performed with Solexa were summarizing data production, evaluating sequencing quality, calculating length distribution of small RNA reads and filtering reads contaminated by rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, repeat, exon and intron sequences using the NCBI Genbank database (http:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Aedes aegypti, a closely related mosquito in the same subgenus (Stegomyia) as Ae. albopictus, provided a valuable “reference genome” to which clean reads were aligned using SOAP . Sequences with a perfect match or one mismatch were retained for further analyses. RNA secondary structures were analyzed using 100 nt of genomic DNA flanking each side of the sequence, and the secondary structures predicted using RNAfold (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAfold.cgi) and analyzed by MIREAP (http://sourceforge.net/projicts/mireap) at default settings. MIREAP is designed specifically to identify genuine miRNAs from deeply-sequenced small RNA libraries. It considers miRNA biogenesis, sequencing depth and structural features to improve the sensitivity and specificity of miRNA identification. Stem-loop hairpins were considered typical only when they fulfilled three criteria: mature miRNAs are present in one arm of the hairpin precursors, which also lack large internal loops or mismatches; the secondary structures of the hairpins are stable with free energies of hybridization lower than -20 kcal/mol; and hairpins are located in intergenic regions or introns. Those genes whose sequences and structures satisfied all of these criteria were considered candidate miRNA genes. Subsequently, the computational approach, miRAlign, was adopted to predict new miRNA genes that are paralogues or orthologues to known miRNAs sequences from miRBase . The final step of miRNA confirmation was performed by aligning Illumina small RNA reads to the predicted pre-miRNA secondary structures to rule out any potential false positives following the stringent criteria described in Berezikov et al. . Aedes albopictus miRNAs were compared with the miRBase version 17 using Blast searches with a low stringent cutoff (e-value 10 and window size 7) to ensure that we do not miss any potential homologues in miRBase (v.17). BLAST hits then were subject to manual inspections. In addition, Mapmi pipeline  was used to find homologues in the available genome assemblies of other insect species including Ae. aegypti, C. quinquefasciatus, An. gambiae, and four Drosophila species, D. melanogaster, D. ananassae, D. pseudoobscura, and D. grimshawi . Two settings were used, one allowing only one mismatch and the other allowing three mismatches, and the results compared. We use 35 as the Mapmi cutoff score for homologues . Potential homologues with a score of less than 35 are subjected to further analysis by miRscan, which takes into account evolutionary conservation . Read counts of each miRNA in the six samples were obtained as described previously . Either the mature miRNA or miRNA* should have at least 15 reads in the six samples for a miRNA gene to be considered expressed. All expression data were normalized with the following formula: Normalized Expression of a miRNA = (The count of the miRNA in a particular sample)/(Total miRNA counts from this sample)×1 million. A hierarchical clustering analysis with MeV 4.8 using Pearson correlation with average linkage was used to evaluate the expression pattern of individual miRNAs , . Prediction of miRNA targets was performed using miRanda (version 3.3a) . The 3′-end UTRs retrieved from Vectorbase (transcripts version L1.2) were used as an input and the miRanda cut-off score was set at 150. The GO terms of the predicted targets were retrieved from Vectorbase Biomart. The GO terms of 6741 out of 9726 transcripts that have annotated 3′-end UTR also were retrieved from Biomart and used as reference in GO enrichment test. The GO enrichments for targets of each miRNA cluster were performed by blast2go using Fisher’s exact test under a false discovery rate of 0.01.
Unless noted otherwise, sample collection conditions for northern blot analyses were identical to those described for preparing samples for Illumina sequencing. Larvae were collected at each instar and pooled to generate early (I and II instars) and late (III and IV instars) larval samples. Female adults were fed on mouse blood and sugar water, and blood-fed samples were collected at 24hrs post-blood-meal. Samples were either homogenized immediately for RNA isolation or flash frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately following collection, then stored at –80°C. Total RNA isolation was carried out using a mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Northern blots were carried out based on Mead et al. . Briefly, total RNA was loaded onto 15% denaturing polyacrylamide gels, and run with ssDNA markers 19 and 23 nt in length. The RNA gels were transferred to BrightStar-Plus nylon membranes (Ambion), cross linked with UV, prehybridized, and then hybridized overnight in the ULTRAhyb-Oligo Hybridization Buffer (Ambion) with the appropriate DIG-labeled probe at 42°C. Wash conditions were the same as described in Mead et al. . Antisense 5′ digoxigenin-labeled miRCURY LNA probes were purchased from Exiqon (Vedbaek, Denmark). Probe sequences were complementary to those shown in Li et al. .
Results and Discussion
Small RNA Sequencing and Evidence for Transcription of Known miRNAs
Small RNAs were sequenced from a number of developmental stages to increase the likelihood of discovering the full complement of Ae. albopictus miRNAs. Small RNA libraries were constructed from embryos, larvae, pupae, adult males, sugar-fed adult females and blood-fed adult females pooled at various time points after feeding. Between 10–14 million high-quality small RNA reads were obtained from each sample after Illumina sequencing and filtering out linker sequences and ambiguous reads (Figure 1). More than 50% of the reads for all six samples were ∼22 nt in length as expected for insect miRNAs. There also is an elevated population of small RNAs ∼28 nt in length in embryos, larvae and females, which may represent piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs). The comparisons of these ∼28 nt RNAs to the Ae. albopictus genome sequence, when available, will help the confirmation of their piRNA status and the identification of their sources. piRNAs are known to derive from and suppress repetitive sequences including transposable elements . Recently piRNAs have been shown to be involved in suppression of virus infection in mosquitoes , . Further investigation of the piRNA pathway in Ae. albopictus will improve our understanding of how this important vector species may defend against repetitive sequences and viruses.
Size distribution and relative frequency in each sample are shown for the small RNAs derived from embryos, larvae, pupae, adult males, sugar-fed adult females, and blood-fed adult females.
A total of 104 miRNA genes with sequence similarity to previously-described miRNAs (miRBase v17) were identified in Ae. albopictus (Tables S1). All but one of the 88 known Ae. aegypti pre-miRNA genes were recovered (Table S1; Figure 2; Li et al. ; miRBase version17). aae-miR-1174, the only Ae. aegypti miRNA that was not represented in any of the Ae. albopictus libraries, also is undetectable by northern blot analysis of samples from all developmental stages . However, small RNAs matching aae-miR-1174* are found, and the putative Ae. albopictus orthologue, aal-miR-1174*, shares 21 nt identity with the mature cqu-miR-1174 from Cu. quinquefasciatus. Thus, members of the miR-1174 family may have undergone an arm switch  with respect to its mature and star sequences in different mosquito species. All orthologues miRNAs that could be recovered according to published data were found in this study, supporting the conclusion that the approach used here is comprehensive.
Two examples are shown for miR-375 (A) and miR-92b (B). The portions of the pre-miRNA sequences (aae-miR-375 pre-miRNA and aae-miR-92b pre-miRNA) from Ae. aegypti with similarity to the Ae. albopictus reads are shown at the bottom of each image. Nucleotides in blue are those that contribute to the secondary structure of the pre-miRNA hairpin. Abbreviations: nt, length of small RNA read in nucleotides; S, sample from which the small RNAs were sequenced; M, adult male; F, adult female; L, larvae; E, embryos; B, blood-fed female; N, number of reads in each sample that showed the exact sequence; %, percentage of sequence identity between the Ae. albopictus small RNA read and the Ae. aegypti pre-miRNA. Nucleotides in red indicate sequence differences between Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti in the miRNA*. The 5′- to 3′-orientation of the sequences is listed from left to right in the image.
A total of 15 novel miRNAs were found in Ae. albopictus by matching small RNA reads with the Ae. aegypti genome sequence and performing subsequent bioinformatic confirmation (Table 1; Figure 3). The criteria set forth by Berezikov et al.  were used to ensure the authenticity of the novel miRNAs. The reliance on matching Ae. aegypti pre-miRNAs to confirm the authenticity of the Ae. albopictus miRNAs results in finding only those that are conserved between the two species. Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus are relatively closely-related, both belonging to the same subgenus Stegomya , thus it is likely that the number of albopictus- or aegypti-specific miRNAs will be low. Indeed, all of the 88 reported Ae. aegypti miRNA genes (miRBase v.17) were found in Ae. albopictus. Small RNAs that do not map to the Ae. aegypti genome were not investigated because genomic DNA sequencing flanking them are needed to evaluate the folding of the pre-miRNA hairpins. The presence of a pre-miRNA hairpin is a critical requirement for authentic miRNAs . Such unmapped miRNAs, if present, are likely albopictus-specific and will be uncovered when the Ae. albopictus genome assembly becomes available.
Two Ae. albopictus miRNAs, aal-miR-new2 (A) and aal-miR-new10 (B), led to the discovery of novel miRNA genes in Ae. aegypti, designated here as aaePre-miR-new2 and aaePre-miR-new10, respectively. Only the most abundant reads from the Ae. albopictus samples are listed here. All notations are identical to Figure 2.
Evolution and Expansion of Mosquito-specific miRNAs
While all mature miRNAs share sequence identity between the two Aedes species, there are a few cases of variation in the miRNA* sequences (Figures 2 and 3; Table S1).The Ae. albopictus miRNAs that matched known Ae. aegypti pre-miRNAs showed identical mature miRNA sequences although there are truncations at the ends as observed in previous reports , . Three examples, miR-375*, miR92b* and miR-2946*, show one nucleotide difference between Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti, (Table S1, Figures 2 and 3). The majority of the miRNA genes that have homologues in non-mosquito species (Table S1) are conserved in all four mosquito species analyzed, Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti, Cu. quinquefasciatus and An. gambiae. The two exceptions are miR-282 and miR-927, which are found in Ae. aegypti and An. gambiae but not in Cu. quinquefasciatus, indicating a loss or rapid change of these two miRNAs in the latter species (Table S3). Among the previously-known mosquito-specific miRNAs, miR-2941 is found only in Aedes while miR-1889, miR-2940, and miR-2946 are conserved in the Culicinae subfamily, which includes Aedes and Culex species (Table S1). The rest of the known mosquito miRNAs are conserved in all four mosquito species (Table S3). In contrast, only two of the 15 novel miRNAs are conserved in all four species in the three mosquito genera (Table 1, Table S1). Two additional miRNA genes are conserved in the Culicinae subfamily, and 11 are found only in Aedes. Furthermore, all 15 novel miRNAs appear to be unique to mosquitoes and have no sequence similarity to any known miRNAs in the miRBase (v.17) and in the sequenced genomes of Drosophila and other insects (data not shown). This may reflect the fact that the accumulation of entries from an ever-increasing number of organisms will exhaust the list of conserved miRNAs and newly-discovered miRNAs are likely to be lineage-specific. The current study increased the number of putative mosquito-specific miRNAs from 10 to 25 (Table S3).
Two observations support the hypothesis that the conservation and lineage-specificity of miRNAs may contain useful information to infer mosquito species phylogeny as was shown recently in other taxonomic groups , . First, only two of the broadly-conserved miRNAs (miR-282 and miR-927) were either lost or mutated significantly in C. quinquefasciatus. This low rate of miRNA loss makes them good phylogenetic markers at the sub-family and genus levels. Second, the pattern of lineage-specific miRNAs is consistent with their phylogenetic relationship. For example, there are 14 Aedes-specific (11 novel plus 3 previously known, Table S3) and three Culicinae-specific (miR-2941, miR-new3 and miR-new4) miRNAs. However, there are no mosquito-specific miRNAs that are shared by Aedes and Anopheles alone or Culex and Anopheles alone. Given the significant involvement of miRNAs in development, these analyses have the potential to link miRNAs to novel evolutionary and developmental features associated with a particular mosquito taxon.
Stage-specific miRNA Expression Profiles
The abundance of transcription from all 119 miRNA genes was evaluated for both miRNAs and miRNA*s on the basis of normalized read counts per miRNA (Table S2; Figure 4). Five clusters (1–5) and additional sub-clusters were identified. Hierarchical clustering showed that many miRNAs were embryo-specific (sub-cluster 1.2) including three mosquito-specific miRNAs, miR-2941, miR-2943, and miR-2946. The high level of miRNA accumulation in embryos is consistent with that found in Ae. aegypti , supporting the hypothesis that they may be critical for early development. miRNAs in cluster 4 are larval-specific while miRNAs in cluster 3 are either pupal-specific or expressed highly in both larval and pupal stages. A total of 71 miRNAs and miRNA*s are found predominantly in adult males (cluster 2) while 13 miRNAs and miRNA*s are abundant only in adult females (sub-cluster 5.1 and 5.2). The blood-fed female sample comprises individuals harvested at various time points after the blood meal and therefore it is likely that sensitivity in detecting dynamic changes of miRNA levels is lost. However, three small clusters of miRNAs within clusters 4 and 5 are expressed highly in sugar-fed females but at reduced levels in blood-fed females. Some miRNAs, including the novel miRNA-new6, showed a higher expression in blood-fed females than in sugar-fed females.
Normalized expression profiles of 215 miRNA/miRNA*s from six different developmental stages were clustered. Stages are in columns and miRNAs in rows. Red indicates that a gene is represented highly at the stage, whereas green indicates the opposite. miRNAs with similar expression patterns cluster together. There are five Clusters (1–5) with variable numbers of sub-clusters. Abbreviations: E, embryos; L, larvae; P, pupae; M, adult males; F, adult females and B, blood-fed adult females.
The relative levels of six phylogenetically-conserved (let-7, miR-133, miR-184, miR-210,miR-9a, and miR-998) and six mosquito-specific (miR-1890, miR-1891, miR-1175, miR-2941, miR-2943 and miR- 946) miRNAs were confirmed by northern blot analyses (Figure 5). All miRNAs tested showed accumulation in at least one of the five developmental samples. The patterns for all except miR-9a are consistent with the Illumina results and it is not clear at this time what caused the discrepancy with miR-9a. The Illumina sequencing results also are consistent with Ae. albopictus northern blot data reported in Zheng et al . For example, similar to what was shown in Figure 4, the northern blot of let-7 indicated that it accumulated mainly in developmental stages after pupation (Figure 5; Zheng et al. ). let-7 also was shown to accumulate abundantly in the later developmental stages in D. melanogaster, An. stephensi and Ae. aegypti , , . Furthermore, let-7 plays a critical developmental regulatory role in the worm, Caenorhabditis elegans, by promoting the development of the 4th instar larva to adult .
Nine representative miRNAs, miR-210 (A), miR-998 (B), miR-2941 (C), miR-133 (D), miR-2943 (E), miR-2946 (F), miR-1890 (G), miR-1891 (H) and miR-184 (I) were subjected to northern blot analyses. The top panels are the northern results and the bottom panels are RNA gels for verification of small ribosomal and tRNA integrity and equal loading of total RNA. ssDNA size markers (19 and 23 nts, not shown) also were visualized on the RNA gel for size estimation. Fifteen micrograms of total RNA were loaded for each sample. Abbreviations: E, embryos; L1–2, mixed 1st and 2nd instar larvae; L3–4, mixed 3rd and 4th instar larvae; P, pupae; M, adult males and F, adult females.
miRNAs and Mosquito Biology
Demonstrating the functions of the 25 “mosquito-specific” miRNAs is expected to inform studies of mosquito biology and mosquito-specific adaptations. Target predictions have been used as clues to miRNA functions and such predictions for known miRNAs are available already at (www.mirbase.org). Analyses of all Ae. albopictus miRNAs including the 15 novel miRNAs were performed using Miranda  and the annotated transcripts from Ae. aegypti (Vectorbase). Each miRNA on average has >100 predicted targets at a stringent score of 150 (only the targets of the novel miRNAs are shown in Table S4). Gene Ontology terms associated with these targets were retrieved and enrichment analyses were performed separately for the targets of miRNAs of each of the five major expression clusters (Figure 4).The GO terms of all Ae. aegypti transcripts that have annotated 3′-end untranslated regions (UTR) were used as the reference and the results are shown in Figures S1 and S2. These analyses provide the basis for further functional studies to confirm the miRNA-target relationships and to investigate the functions of these miRNAs. For example, targets of miRNAs that are expressed predominantly during the embryonic stage showed significant GO term enrichment in transcription regulation, signal transduction, and cytoskeletal protein binding. The enrichment in these types of genes is consistent with expected molecular processes during embryonic development. The UTR and GO annotation is currently incomplete for the Ae. aegypti genome. Potential mRNA targets will not be identified unless their 3′UTRs are annotated. Nonetheless, GO terms of 6741 transcripts are available for analysis. Therefore the incompleteness of UTR and GO annotation should not significantly affect the general conclusion of the GO analysis described above, unless there is a systemic bias in the annotation of a certain class of genes.
Female mosquitoes feed on blood to acquire proteins necessary for reproduction and nutrition. Transmission of vector-borne pathogens requires blood feeding on an infected host and the blood meal also triggers a cascade of endocrinological, molecular, and physiological events that switch the adult female from host-seeking to reproduction , . Therefore it is not unexpected to detect increases or decreases in accumulation of the majority of 119 miRNAs post blood-feeding. These miRNAs are likely important regulators of blood-meal-induced molecular changes. For example, aae-miR-275 affects blood digestion, fluid secretion, and egg development in Ae. Aegypti . Aedes albopictus has undergone a rapid expansion in its world-wide distribution and it is emerging as a vector for Dengue and Chikungunya viruses . Understanding the function of a key class of gene regulators in this important mosquito vector has biological and practical significance.
Color-coded gene ontology (GO) graph showing significantly-enriched GO terms describing biological processes. Predicted targets of miRNAs within each cluster were analyzed separately. A false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01 was used as the threshold. For each GO term, a brief description, GO number, FDR and P value were shown.
Color-coded gene ontology (GO) graph showing significantly enriched GO terms describing molecular functions. Predicted targets of miRNAs within each cluster (Figure 4) were analyzed separately. A false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01 was used as the threshold. For each GO term, a brief description, GO number, FDR and P value were shown. No GO term was enriched significantly for targets of miRNAs in cluster 3 at a FDR of 0.01.
Sequence, location, expression, and hairpins of miRNAs in Aedes albopictu.
Number of small RNA reads mapped to a miRNA/miRNA*.
Distribution of mosquito-specific miRNAs as indicated by Mapmi values.
We thank Xiaofang Jiang (Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology graduate program at Virginia Tech) for bioinformatics support.
Conceived and designed the experiments: XC ZT. Performed the experiments: JG WH JW PZ. Analyzed the data: MC JG WH JW AAJ XC ZT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MC. Wrote the paper: JG WH JW AAJ XC ZT.
- 1. Bartel DP (2009) MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136: 215–233.
- 2. Gottwein E, Cullen BR (2010) A human herpesvirus microRNA inhibits p21 expression and attenuates p21-mediated cell cycle arrest. J Virol 84: 5229–5237.
- 3. Herranz H, Cohen SM (2010) MicroRNAs and gene regulatory networks: managing the impact of noise in biological systems. Genes Dev 24: 1339–1344.
- 4. Winter F, Edaye S, Huttenhofer A, Brunel C (2007) Anopheles gambiae miRNAs as actors of defense reaction against Plasmodium invasion. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 6953–6962.
- 5. Skalsky RL, Vanlandingham DL, Scholle F, Higgs S, Cullen BR (2009) Identification of microRNAs expressed in two mosquito vectors, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus. BMC Genomics 11: 119.
- 6. Newman MA, Hammond SM (2010) Emerging paradigms of regulated microRNA processing. Genes Dev 24: 1086–1092.
- 7. Okamura K, Hagen JW, Duan H, Tyler DM, Lai EC (2007) The mirtron pathway generates microRNA-class regulatory RNAs in Drosophila. Cell 130: 89–100.
- 8. Ruby JG, Jan CH, Bartel DP (2007) Intronic microRNA precursors that bypass Drosha processing. Nature 448: 83–86.
- 9. Stark A, Kheradpour P, Parts L, Brennecke J, Hodges E, et al. (2007) Systematic discovery and characterization of fly microRNAs using 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Res 17: 1865–1879.
- 10. Ruby JG, Stark A, Johnston WK, Kellis M, Bartel DP, et al. (2007) Evolution, biogenesis, expression, and target predictions of a substantially expanded set of Drosophila microRNAs. Genome Res 17: 1850–1864.
- 11. Berezikov E, Robine N, Samsonova A, Westholm JO, Naqvi A, et al. (2011) Deep annotation of Drosophila melanogaster microRNAs yields insights into their processing, modification, and emergence. Genome Res 21: 203–215.
- 12. Mead EA, Tu Z (2008) Cloning, characterization, and expression of microRNAs from the Asian malaria mosquito, Anopheles stephensi.BMC Genomics 2008. 9: 244.
- 13. Li S, Mead EA, Liang S, Tu Z (2008) Direct sequencing and expression analysis of a large number of miRNAs in Aedes aegypti and a multi-species survey of novel mosquito miRNAs. BMC Genomics 10: 581.
- 14. Nelder M, Kesavaraju B, Farajollahi A, Healy S, Unlu I, et al. (2010) Suppressing Aedes albopictus, an emerging vector of dengue and chikungunya viruses, by a novel combination of a monomolecular film and an insect-growth regulator. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 831–837.
- 15. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J (2008) SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program.Bioinformatics. 24: 713–714.
- 16. Wang X, Zhang J, Li F, Gu J, He T, et al. (2005) MicroRNA identification based on sequence and structure alignment.Bioinformatics. 21: 3610–3614.
- 17. Berezikov E, Robine N, Samsonova A, Westholm JO, Naqvi A, et al. (2011) Deep annotation of Drosophila melanogaster microRNAs yields insights into their processing, modification, and emergence. Genome Res 21: 203–215.
- 18. Guerra-Assuncao JA, Enright AJ (2010) MapMi: automated mapping of microRNA loci. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 133.
- 19. Stark A, Lin MF, Kheradpour P, Pedersen JS, Parts L, et al. (2007) Discovery of functional elements in 12 Drosophila genomes using evolutionary signatures. Nature 450: 219–232.
- 20. Lim LP, Glasner ME, Yekta S, Burge CB, Bartel DP (2003) Vertebrate microRNA genes. Science 299: 1540.
- 21. Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, et al. (2008) TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 34: 374–378.
- 22. Saeed AI, Bhagabati NK, Braisted JC, Liang W, Sharov V, et al. (2006) TM4 microarray software suite. Methods Enzymol 411: 134–193.
- 23. John B, Enright AJ, Aravin A, Tuschl T, Sander C, et al. (2004) Human MicroRNA targets. PLoS Biol 2: e363.
- 24. Siomi MC, Sato K, Pezic D, Aravin AA (2010) PIWI-interacting small RNAs: the vanguard of genome defence. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 246–58.
- 25. Léger P, Lara E, Jagla B, Sismeiro O, Mansuroglu Z, et al. (2013) Dicer-2- and Piwi-mediated RNA interference in Rift Valley fever virus-infected mosquito cells. J Virol 87: 1631–1648.
- 26. Morazzani EM, Wiley MR, Murreddu MG, Adelman ZN, Myles KM (2012) Production of virus-derived ping-pong-dependent piRNA-like small RNAs in the mosquito soma. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002470.
- 27. Zheng PM, Wu JY, Gu JB, Tu ZJ, Chen XG (2010) Isolation, identification and analysis of the expression profile of miRNAs in Aedes albopictus. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 30: 677–680.
- 28. de Wit E, Linsen SE, Cuppen E, Berezikov E (2009) Repertoire and evolution of miRNA genes in four divergent nematode species. Genome Res 19: 2064–2074.
- 29. Marchi A, Rai KS (1986) Chromosome banding homologies in three species of Aedes (Stegomyia).Can J Genet Cytol. 28: 198–202.
- 30. Campbell LI, Rota-Stabelli O, Edgecombe GD, Marchioro T, Longhorn SJ, et al. (2011) MicroRNAs and phylogenomics resolve the relationships of Tardigrada and suggest that velvet worms are the sister group of Arthropoda. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 15920–15924.
- 31. Lyson TR, Sperling EA, Heimberg AM, Gauthier JA, King BL, et al. (2012) MicroRNAs support a turtle+lizard clade. Biol Lett 8: 104–107.
- 32. Aravin AA, Lagos-Quintana M, Yalcin A, Zavolan M, Marks D, et al. (2003) The small RNA profile during Drosophila melanogaster development. Dev Cell 5: 337–350.
- 33. Reinhart BJ, Slack FJ, Basson M, Pasquinelli AE, Bettinger JC, et al. (2000) The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans.Nature. 403: 901–906.
- 34. Marinotti O, Calvo E, Nguyen QK, Dissanayake S, Ribeiro JM, et al. (2006) Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in adult Anopheles gambiae.. Insect Mol Biol 15: 1–12.
- 35. Dissanayake SN, Ribeiro JM, Wang MH, Dunn WA, Yan G, et al. (2010) aeGEPUCI: a database of gene expression in the dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti. BMC Res Notes 3: 248.
- 36. Bryant B, Macdonald W, Raikhel AS (2010) microRNA miR-275 is indispensable for blood digestion and egg development in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 22391–22398.