Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

TGFβ1 Polymorphisms Predict Distant Metastasis–Free Survival in Patients with Inoperable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Definitive Radiotherapy

  • Xianglin Yuan,

    Affiliation Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Qingyi Wei,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Ritsuko Komaki,

    Affiliation Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Zhensheng Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Ju Yang,

    Affiliation Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Susan L. Tucker,

    Affiliation Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Ting Xu,

    Affiliation Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • John V. Heymach,

    Affiliation Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Charles Lu,

    Affiliation Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • James D. Cox,

    Affiliation Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Zhongxing Liao

    Affiliation Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

TGFβ1 Polymorphisms Predict Distant Metastasis–Free Survival in Patients with Inoperable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Definitive Radiotherapy

  • Xianglin Yuan, 
  • Qingyi Wei, 
  • Ritsuko Komaki, 
  • Zhensheng Liu, 
  • Ju Yang, 
  • Susan L. Tucker, 
  • Ting Xu, 
  • John V. Heymach, 
  • Charles Lu, 
  • James D. Cox



Transforming growth factor (TGF) -β1 signaling is involved in cancer-cell metastasis. We investigated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at TGFβ1 were associated with overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy.


We genotyped TGFβ1 SNPs at rs1800469 (C–509T), rs1800471 (G915C), and rs1982073 (T+29C) by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism in blood samples from 205 NSCLC patients who had had definitive radiotherapy at one institution in November 1998–January 2005. We also tested whether the TGF-β1 rs1982073 (T+29C) SNP affected the migration and invasion of A549 and PC9 lung cancer cells.


Median follow-up time for all patients was 17 months (range, 1–97 months; 39 months for patients alive at the time of analysis). Multivariate analysis showed that the TGFβ1 rs1800469 CT/CC genotype was associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.463 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.012–2.114], P = 0.043) and shorter DMFS (HR = 1.601 [95% CI = 1.042–2.459], P = 0.032) and that the TGFβ1 rs1982073 CT/CC genotype predicted poor DMFS (HR = 1.589 [95% CI = 1.009–2.502], P = 0.046) and poor brain MFS (HR = 2.567 [95% CI = 1.155–5.702], P = 0.021) after adjustment for age, sex, race, performance status, smoking status, tumor histology and volume, stage, receipt of concurrent radiochemotherapy, number of chemotherapy cycles, and radiation dose. Transfection with TGFβ1+29C (vs. +29T) stimulated the migration and invasion of A549 and PC9 cells, suggesting that TGFβ1+29C may be linked with increased metastatic potential.


TGFβ1 genotypes at rs1800469 and rs1982073 could be useful for predicting DMFS among patients with NSCLC treated with definitive radiation therapy. These findings require validation in larger prospective trials and thorough mechanistic studies.


Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 160,340 deaths in the United States in 2012 [1]. The current standard of care for unresectable non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), by far the most common presentation at diagnosis, is radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy. However, survival rates after such therapy remain poor because of high rates of recurrence, both local and distant. Commonly used radio(chemo)therapy regimens are also associated with significant normal tissue toxicity, including radiation pneumonitis, which can be lethal. Better treatment strategies designed according to each individual patient’s intrinsic sensitivity and risk of toxicity, the tumor’s unique expression of molecular target(s), and the risks of locoregional or distant disease recurrence are urgently needed.

One potential molecular biomarker for predicting treatment outcome after radiochemotherapy for NSCLC, in terms of both tumor response and normal tissue damage, is transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1). Members of the TGFβ cytokine superfamily elicit a diverse range of cellular responses, including proliferation, migration, fibrosis, apoptosis, tissue inflammation, wound repair, and angiogenesis [2][4]. Changes in TGFβ signaling have been reported in several types of cancer in humans, including NSCLC [5], [6]. Although TGFβ typically acts as a tumor suppressor [7], [8], as tumor development progresses, tumor cells acquire resistance to TGFβ–induced growth arrest. Of the three known TGFβ isoforms, TGFβ1 seems to be directly involved in mediating the metastatic activity of cancer cells [9]. Preclinical studies show that inhibition of TGFβ1 signaling downregulates the migration of tumor cells and suppresses the development of metastasis [10], [11]. Thus, TGFβ1 may have a dual role in cancer development, suppressing tumor growth during the initial phases of carcinogenesis but promoting tumor progression and metastasis in more advanced stages [12], [13]. Indeed, increasing evidence shows that TGFβ signaling has a role in the development of lung cancer [14], [15]. TGFβ1 has also been shown to induce the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, which has a crucial role in the invasion and metastasis of some types of tumor cells [16]. TGFβ has further been implicated in tumor cell sensitivity to radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs [17][19].

In addition to its effects on tumor cells, TGFβ1 is also involved in the response of normal tissues to radiation or radiochemotherapy. Two groups have shown preliminary evidence that changes in plasma levels of TGFβ1 during radiotherapy may predict the risk of developing radiation-induced lung toxicity [20], [21]. Strong associations have also been reported between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TGFβ1 and radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with breast cancer or gynecologic cancers [22], [23] and between SNPs and radiation pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer treated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy [24]. Explorations of the prognostic value of TGFβ1 SNPs in a variety of cancer types [25], [26] suggest that some TGFβ1 genotypes predict more aggressive tumor phenotypes and adverse prognosis.

We previously assessed the relationship between three different SNPs of TGFβ1 [rs1800469 (C–509T), rs1800471 (G915C), and rs1982073 (T+29C)] and the development of radiation pneumonitis in patients with NSCLC treated with radiochemotherapy and observed that the CT/CC genotypes of TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) were associated with significantly lower risk of radiation pneumonitis [24]. Moreover, rs1982073 (T+29C) and rs1800469 (C-509T) have been linked with increased serum levels of TGFβ1 [26] and with the incidence of invasive breast cancer [27]; rs1800469 (C-509T) has also been linked with advanced-stage prostate cancer [26] and colon cancer [28]. On the basis of these published findings, we investigated whether these functional genetic variants of TGFβ1 also affect tumor response and outcome in patients with inoperable NSCLC treated with definitive radiation or radiochemotherapy, assessed in terms of overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS).


Subjects for this retrospective analysis were selected from a large database of 740 patients with NSCLC who had been treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from November 1998 through 2009. A total of 261 patients were identified as having had whole-blood samples available for analysis; all of these patients had been treated in November 1998 through January 2005. From those 261 patients, 56 were excluded: 25 who had died of other diseases or whose vital status was unknown; 16 who had died of NSCLC without information on distant metastasis or locoregional disease, 2 who had had surgery, 1 who had had small-cell lung cancer, and 12 who had had stage IV disease, leaving a total of 205 patients with complete information for the current analysis.


Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes from whole blood samples with a DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA purity and concentration were determined by spectrophotometric measurement of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm. SNPs in TGFβ1 were chosen that met at least two of the following three criteria: (1) reported associations with lung or other types of cancer; (2) a minor allele frequency of >5% in individuals of Caucasian descent; and (3) location in the promotor or coding region of the gene. We genotyped three such SNPs: rs1800469 (C–509T, in the promoter region), rs1800471 (G915C, in exon 1), and rs1982073 (T+29C, also in exon 1) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) –restriction fragment length polymorphism as described elsewhere [24].

In vitro Assessment of rs1982073 TGFβ1+29C or TGFβ1+29T Stable Transfectants

We also tested if TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) C variant genotypes influenced the metastatic potential of lung cancer cells in vitro as follows. For these experiments, A549 and PC9 cells, both originating from human lung adenocarcinoma, were cultured in Ham’s F12 (A549) or RPMI 1640 (PC9) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100 units/mL penicillin and 100 units/mL streptomycin) at 37°C with 5% CO2, andmedium was refreshed every 2–3 days. When the cell cultures reached about 50% confluence in fresh serum-free medium, they were transfected with a control virus or with a TGFβ1 (+29C or +29T) -overexpressing lentivirus (constructed as described below) at a multiplicity of infection of 100, incubated for 48 hours, and cultured further in Ham’s F12 (A549) or RPMI 1640 (PC9). The transfection efficiency, measured in terms of cellular expression of green fluorescent protein by fluorescence microscopy (Leica DMI4000B), was found to be >99%. The transfected cells were then tested for their invasiveness and motility as described below.

TGFβ1 cDNAs were amplified by PCR, with a cDNA library from bronchial smooth muscle cells was used as the DNA template. The primers were 5′-CCAAGCTTATGCCGCCCTCCGGGCTG-3′ and 5′-CGGAATTCTCAGCTGCACTTGCAGGAG-3′ (underlined sequences indicate the HindIII and EcoRi restriction sites). The TGFβ1 cDNAs with +29C and +29T were sent to Genechem Company (Shanghai, China) to construct the relevant lentivirus systems.

After transfection, the A549 and PC9 cells were extracted into cold lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor mix (1 mM PMSF, 2 µg/mL aprotinin, 1 µg/mL leupeptin, and 1 µg/mL pepstatin A)]. The cell lysates were then clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 20 min, the supernatants were collected, and the protein concentration of each lysate was determined with a BCA Protein Assay Kit. Equal amount of proteins in lysates were separated on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate for polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad). TGFβ1 was detected by specific antibody #3709 from Cell Signaling Technology.

Cell migration was assessed with a scratch assay and cell invasiveness with a transwell assay as follows. For the scratch assay, A549 and PC9 cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates at 2×105 cells/well and incubated for 24 hours, after which the monolayer was scratched with a sterile 200-µL pipette tip, the plates were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and the cells incubated with serum-free Ham’s F12 (A549) or serum-free RPMI (PC9) for 24 hours, after which images were captured by microscopy at 100× magnification and the “healing” areas were measured with a phase contrast microscope (Leica DMI4000B). For each cell type, three independent transfection experiments were performed, and all experiments were carried out in triplicate.

For the transwell assays, A549 and PC9 cells were suspended in serum-free Ham’s F12 or serum-free RPMI 1640 at a density of 3×105 per mL, and 100-µL aliquots were added to the upper compartments of a 24-well transwell chamber containing polycarbonate filters with 8-µm pores and coated with 60 µL of Matrigel (1∶9 dilution; Sigma Aldrich). Five hundred-microliter aliquots of Ham’s F12 or RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS were added to the lower chambers, and the chambers were incubated for 24 hours. At that time, cells in the upper compartment were removed with a cotton swab, rinsed with PBS, and fixed in 100% methanol. Cells that had invaded through the Matrigel to the lower surface were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and quantified by counting the number of fluorescent cells in 5 random microscopic fields per filter at 400× magnification. Three independent experiments were performed.

Statistical Analysis

In the clinical sample correlation studies, OS time was calculated from the first day of radiation treatment until death or the last known follow-up. DMFS times were calculated from the first day of radiation treatment to the first observed day of distant metastasis or the last known follow-up. Associations between the distribution of TGFβ1 genotypes and clinical characteristics were assessed by Fisher’s exact tests or Pearson’s χ2 tests. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to evaluate the influence of various TGFβ1 genotypes on OS and DMFS, calculated as hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All HRs were adjusted for age, sex, race, Karnofsky performance status, smoking status, tumor histology, gross tumor volume, disease stage, receipt of chemotherapy or concurrent radiochemotherapy, number of cycles of chemotherapy, and radiation dose received. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the effect of TGFβ1 genotype on the cumulative probability of DMFS. All reported P values were two-sided, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL).

The in vitro data were expressed as means ± SD from three independent experiments (each of which had been performed in triplicate) and compared with Student’s t tests. P values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.


Clinical Sample Correlation Studies

The clinical characteristics of the 205 analyzed patients are summarized in Table 1. Patient-, disease-, and treatment-related characteristics according to TGFβ1 polymorphisms were well balanced in terms of age, race, sex, Karnofsky performance status, tobacco use, tumor histology, gross tumor volume, disease stage, number of cycles of chemotherapy, receipt of chemotherapy vs. radiation only, and radiation dose received (not shown).

The median follow-up times were 17 months for the entire group and 39 months for patients who were alive at the time of analysis (range, 1–97 months). The median OS time was 21 months. A total of 103 patients (50%) developed DM at 134 sites; 27 patients had DM at more than 1 site (23 at 2 sites and 4 at 3 sites). The sites of metastases included brain (n = 39), bone (n = 26), lung (n = 26), adrenals (n = 13), liver (n = 14), and other unspecified sites (n = 16).

Figure 1 illustrates the Kaplan-Meier analysis of the effect of TGFβ1 genotype and cumulative probability of DMFS. The TGFβ1 rs1800469 (C-509T) CT+TT genotypes were associated with significantly shorter median DMFS (11 months vs. 31 months for the CC genotype, P = 0.010; Fig. 1A). The TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) CT+CC genotypes were also associated with significantly shorter median DMFS (compared with the TT genotype) (P = 0.013; Fig. 1C). However, no associations were found between any genotype (GG, CG, CC, or CG+CC) of the TGFβ1 rs1800471 (G915C) SNP and DMFS (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier estimates of associations between distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) and polymorphisms of TGF-β1 at (A) rs1800469 (C–509T), (B) rs1800471 (G915C), or (C) rs1892073 (T+29C) in patients treated with radiation or radiochemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

P values were calculated by log-rank tests.

Findings from multivariate analyses of TGFβ1 polymorphisms and clinical outcomes adjusted for patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors are shown in Table 2. The TGFβ1 rs1800469 (C-509T) CT+TT genotypes were associated with increased HRs for OS and DMFS compared with the CC genotype (HR for OS = 1.463, 95% CI = 1.012–2.114, P = 0.043; HR for DMFS = 1.601, 95% CI = 1.042–2.459, P = 0.032). The TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) CT+CC genotypes were also associated with an increased HR for DMFS compared with the CC genotype (HR = 1.589, 95% CI = 1.009–2.502, P = 0.046). No associations were found between any genotypes (GG, CG, CC, or CG+CC) of the TGFβ1 rs1800471 (G915C) SNP and OS or DMFS.

Table 2. Multivariate analysis of TGFβ1 polymorphisms and clinical outcome in NSCLC.

We further analyzed the association of TGFβ1 rs1800469 (C–509T), rs1800471 (G915C), and rs1982073 (T+29C) genotypes with the organ sites in which metastases developed by using Cox proportional hazard models. The CT or TT genotypes of rs1800469 (vs. CC) and the CT or CC genotypes pf rs1982073 (vs. TT), were both associated with a twofold increase in HRs for brain, bone, and lung metastases in univariate analyses. However, in multivariate analyses, the only significant association was between rs1982073 CT or CC (vs. TT) and brain metastases (HR = 2.567 [CI = 1.155–5.702], P = 0.021) (Table 3).

Table 3. TGF-β1 genotype and brain metastasis-free survival in 102 NSCLC patients without distant metastasis and 39 NSCLC patients with brain metastasis.

In vitro Findings

Transfection efficiency for both A549 and PC9 lung cancer cell lines was approximately 99% (Figs. 2A,B). Transfection of A549 and PC9 cells with TGF-β1+29C or +29T induced the expected increases in the expression of both precursor and active forms of TGFβ1 (Figs. 2C,D). Both cell lines, upon transfection with the TGFβ1+29C construct, demonstrated increased motility (Figs. 3A,B,C,E) and increased invasion (Figs. 3D,F) relative to the +29T transfectants. These results suggest that the TGFβ1+29C genotype in both of these lung cancer cell lines induced a phenotype with increased potential for metastasis.

Figure 2. Transfection of A549 and PC9 lung cancer cell lines with lentivirus for TGFβ1 rs1892073+29C or +29T.

(A,B) Fluorescence labeling indicated the transfection efficiency was >99% for both cell lines. (C,D) Western blot analysis confirmed that transfection with either +27C or +29T led to overexpression of TGFβ1 in both precursor and active forms. Con, control lentivirus construct; glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH) was used as a loading control.

Figure 3. Transfection of A549 cells and PC9 cells with TGFβ1 rs1892073+29C, but not with +29T, led to enhanced motility and invasion.

(A,B) Fluorescence phase-contrast microscopic images show that at 24 hours, more of the +29C transfectants migrated into a “healing” area in a scratch assay than did +29T transfectants. These findings are depicted quantitatively as the distance migrated during the scratch assay in panels C and E. (D,F) The +29C transfectants showed greater invasiveness, as indicated by numbers of cells penetrating a membrane in a transwell assay. Results are given as means from 3 independent experiments; error bars representing standard deviation.


Metastasis remains a major cause of treatment failure for patients with NSCLC treated with radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy [29], [30]. Factors that predict the biologic behavior and metastatic potential of NSCLC have been actively sought for the past 3 decades. The most significant finding from the current study is the association between variant TGFβ1 genotypes at rs1800469 and rs1982073 and worse DMFS among patients with NSCLC given radiotherapy; this finding suggests that SNPs in TGFβ1 genes could be used as biomarkers to prescribe personalized radiochemotherapy according to the expected pattern of recurrence before the initiation of treatment. We further validated the association of the TGF-β1 SNP rs1982073 T+29C with enhanced migration and invasiveness of two lung cancer cell lines, A549 and PC9, in vitro.

Further analyses of our results showed a statistically higher risk of brain metastasis in patients with the TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) C variant genotypes. Brain metastasis is a common complication of locally advanced NSCLC, with 21% to 54% of patients developing brain metastasis during the course of the disease [31], [32]. The OS time of patients with brain metastasis generally ranges from about 3 to 6 months [33][35], and 30%–50% of patients with brain metastases die from neurologic causes [36], [37]. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been shown in two randomized studies to reduce the incidence or delay the onset of brain metastasis in patients with locally advanced NSCLC after primary therapy, and use of PCI can prolong OS in such patients [38], [39]. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), in an attempt to extend these results, opened a large trial (RTOG 0214) of PCI versus observation for patients with locally advanced NSCLC. In patients with stage III disease without progression of disease after therapy, PCI decreased the rate of brain metastasis but did not improve OS or disease-free survival [40]. Ideally, one would prescribe PCI only for patients at high risk of developing brain metastases. However, so far, no reliable way has been found to identify which patients will develop brain metastasis and which will not–hence the intense search for biomarkers. Therefore, our finding that TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) C variant genotypes were associated with brain metastasis is of particular importance in the management of NSCLC, because this SNP might serve as a biomarker to identify patients who would benefit from PCI.

The possibility of using TGFβ1 SNPs as predictive biomarkers in other kinds of cancer has been studied by others. In one such study, the TGFβ1 rs1800469 C–509T homozygous TT genotype was found to be associated with an increased risk of having an aggressive form of prostate cancer, but the rs1982073 T+29C (T+29C) C variant genotypes were not [26]. In contrast, another group showed that patients with breast cancer who carried the T+29C C allele had lower 5-year disease-free survival rates than did those with the TT genotype [25]. Other evidence is emerging that SNPs in some other genes may predict outcome in NSCLC. For example, genetic aberrations in genes for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -3 and MMP-9 or the x-ray repair protein XRCC1 have been reported to influence the clinical behavior and risk of metastasis of lung cancer [41][43]. These biomarkers have yet to be widely translated into clinical practice. Our findings are in line with these reports: DM was a major pattern of failure in our study (DMFS rate, 50.2%), and variant genotypes at TGFβ1 rs1800469 (C-509T) and TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) seemed to be associated with shorter DMFS times. If validated in larger studies, our findings could serve as the basis for using these genotypes as a prognostic marker of clinical outcome, particularly predisposition to brain metastasis, in patients with NSCLC.

The mechanistic basis of the findings from the current study needs further investigation. Some investigators have suggested that TGβ1 protein levels might independently predict survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung [18], [44][46]. In those studies, TGFβ1 expression in primary lung cancer tissues was higher among patients with pulmonary metastases than that among patients without such metastases. Earlier reports suggested that polymorphisms in the signal sequence at +915 [47], C–509T [48], and T+29C (encoding Leu10Pro) in the TGFβ1 gene were associated with increased TGFβ1 production. Those studies may shed light on our finding that variant genotypes at TGFβ1 rs1800469 (C-509T) and TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) were associated with shorter DMFS times in patients with NSCLC treated with definitive radiation therapy.

In our study, having the TGFβ1 rs1800469 (C-509T) CT or TT genotypes seemed in univariate analysis to be associated with shorter OS, and no associations were found between OS and TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) genotypes. This finding is inconsistent with a report by Mu et al. [49] showing that patients with early-stage breast cancer and the T/T genotype or high intratumoral TGFβ1 levels had shorter OS times than did those without T/T or with low intratumorial TGFβ1 levels. However, this association was different for patients with late-stage disease: for those patients, having the T/T genotype was associated with lower risk of disease recurrence. These findings indicate that TGFB1 has complex roles in breast cancer progression, which supports the findings of other studies that TGFβ1 has conflicting effects on tumor growth and metastasis.

Our study had several limitations; its single-institution and retrospective nature require that its findings be validated in larger, preferably multi-institutional prospective trials. Another limitation was that we did not measure TGFβ1 protein levels in plasma before, during, or after radiation therapy, and so we could not determine if having the TGFβ1 rs1982073 (T+29C) CT genotype influenced the expression of TGFβ1 protein levels in vivo, nor could we determine whether the risk of DM correlates with changes in this variable before or after treatment. Thus clarification is still needed regarding the relationships among polymorphisms in TGFβ1 and TGFβ1 protein levels in plasma and prognosis in patients with NSCLC. Finally, our research was limited to patients who received definitive radiation therapy. Whether the TGFβ1 rs1982073 variant genotypes also predict outcome among patients who undergo surgery or other non-radiation-based therapies remains unclear.

Our previous work [24] showed that having the CT or CC variants in TGFβ1 rs1982073 was associated with lower risk of severe (grade ≥3) radiation pneumonitis, an observation suggesting that radiation dose intensification to increase locoregional tumor control in patients with this genotype would be feasible. However, the results we report here showed that patients with those genotypes were at increased risk of DM, specifically brain metastases, an observation suggesting that systemic treatment and PCI are indicated. The results from our study suggest, for the first time, that the TGFβ1 rs1982073 variant genotypes may be useful as a genetic biomarker to help physicians tailor the treatment according to the patient’s risk of radiation pneumonitis and DM. As such, additional studies are needed to validate this finding and to investigate the mechanisms by which TGFβ1 polymorphisms influence the course of lung cancer development and progression. These kinds of studies will help to provide a better understanding of the cancer microenvironment and metastasis and may be instrumental in tailoring treatment for NSCLC.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: ZXL XLY QYW. Performed the experiments: JY TX ZSL. Analyzed the data: XLY ZXL QYW TX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XLY ZXL QYW TX. Wrote the paper: ZXL XLY QYW ST. Performed all statistical analysis: ST. Interpretation of the data: ST. Edited the manuscript: ST. Concept development: RK JH CL JDC. Reviewed the manuscript: RK JH CL JDC. Interpretation of the results: JH CL JDC. Final approval: JH CL JDC.


  1. 1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: Cancer J Clin 62: 10–29.
  2. 2. Massague J (1998) TGF-beta signal transduction. Annual Review of Biochemistry 67: 753–791.
  3. 3. Massague J, Gomis RR (2006) The logic of TGFbeta signaling. FEBS Letters 580: 2811–2820.
  4. 4. Roberts AB (1999) TGF-beta signaling from receptors to the nucleus. Microbes Infect 1: 1265–1273.
  5. 5. Finger EC, Turley RS, Dong M, How T, Fields TA, et al. (2008) TbetaRIII suppresses non-small cell lung cancer invasiveness and tumorigenicity. Carcinogenesis 29: 528–535.
  6. 6. Kang Y, Prentice MA, Mariano JM, Davarya S, Linnoila RI, et al. (2000) Transforming growth factor-beta 1 and its receptors in human lung cancer and mouse lung carcinogenesis. Exp Lung Res 26: 685–707.
  7. 7. Kato Y, Habas R, Katsuyama Y, Naar AM, He X (2002) A component of the ARC/Mediator complex required for TGF beta/Nodal signalling. Nature 418: 641–646.
  8. 8. Jeon HS, Dracheva T, Yang SH, Meerzaman D, Fukuoka J, et al. (2008) SMAD6 contributes to patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer and its knockdown reestablishes TGF-beta homeostasis in lung cancer cells. Cancer Res 68: 9686–9692.
  9. 9. Jakowlew SB (2006) Transforming growth factor-beta in cancer and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25: 435–457.
  10. 10. Tsuchida K, Sunada Y, Noji S, Murakami T, Uezumi A, et al. (2006) Inhibitors of the TGF-beta superfamily and their clinical applications. Mini Rev Med Chem 6: 1255–1261.
  11. 11. Saunier EF, Akhurst RJ (2006) TGF beta inhibition for cancer therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 6: 565–578.
  12. 12. Derynck R, Akhurst RJ, Balmain A (2001) TGF-beta signaling in tumor suppression and cancer progression. Nat Genet 29: 117–129.
  13. 13. Wakefield LM, Roberts AB (2002) TGF-beta signaling: positive and negative effects on tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2002 12: 22–29.
  14. 14. Fong YC, Hsu SF, Wu CL, Li TM, Kao ST, et al. (2009) Transforming growth factor-beta1 increases cell migration and beta1 integrin up-regulation in human lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer 64: 13–21.
  15. 15. Vicent S, Luis-Ravelo D, Anton I, Garcia-Tunon I, Borras-Cuesta F, et al. (2008) A novel lung cancer signature mediates metastatic bone colonization by a dual mechanism. Cancer Res 68: 2275–2285.
  16. 16. Tiwari N, Gheldof A, Tatari M, Christofori G (2012) EMT as the ultimate survival mechanism of cancer cells. Semin Cancer Biol 22: 194–207.
  17. 17. Chorna I, Fedorenko O, Datsyuk L, Stoika R (2005) Expression of mRNA coding for TGF-beta and its receptors in irradiated human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells differing in their sensitivity to doxorubicin. Exp Oncol 27: 156–158.
  18. 18. Saji H, Nakamura H, Awut I, Kawasaki N, Hagiwara M, et al. (2003) Significance of expression of TGF-beta in pulmonary metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer tissues. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 9: 295–300.
  19. 19. Suardet L, Li C, Little JB (1996) Radio-induced modulation of transforming growth factor beta1 sensitivity in a p53 wild-type human colorectal-cancer cell line. Int J Cancer 68: 126–131.
  20. 20. Novakova-Jiresova A, Van Gameren MM, Coppes RP, Kampinga HH, Groen HJ (2004) Transforming growth factor-beta plasma dynamics and post-irradiation lung injury in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 71: 183–189.
  21. 21. Zhao L, Sheldon K, Chen M, Yin MS, Hayman JA, et al. (2008) The predictive role of plasma TGF-beta1 during radiation therapy for radiation-induced lung toxicity deserves further study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 59: 232–239.
  22. 22. Andreassen CN, Alsner J, Overgaard J, Herskind C, Haviland J, et al. (2005) TGFB1 polymorphisms are associated with risk of late normal tissue complications in the breast after radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 75: 18–21.
  23. 23. De Ruyck K, Van Eijkeren M, Claes K, Bacher K, Vral A, et al. (2006) TGF[beta]1 polymorphisms and late clinical radiosensitivity in patients treated for gynecologic tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65: 1240–1248.
  24. 24. Yuan X, Liao Z, Liu Z, Wang LE, Tucker SL, et al. (2009) Single nucleotide polymorphism at rs1982073:T869C of the TGFbeta 1 gene is associated with the risk of radiation pneumonitis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 27: 3370–3378.
  25. 25. Shu XO, Gao YT, Cai Q, Pierce L, Cai H, et al. (2004) Genetic polymorphisms in the TGF-beta 1 gene and breast cancer survival: a report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Cancer Res 64: 836–839.
  26. 26. Ewart-Toland A, Chan JM, Yuan J, Balmain A, Ma J (2004) A gain of function TGFB1 polymorphism may be associated with late stage prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13: 759–764.
  27. 27. Dunning AM, Ellis PD, McBride S, Kirschenlohr HL, Healey CS, et al. (2003) A transforming growth factorbeta1 signal peptide variant increases secretion in vitro and is associated with increased incidence of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 63: 2610–2615.
  28. 28. Slattery ML, Herrick JS, Lundgreen A, Wolff RK (2011) Genetic variation in the TGF-beta signaling pathway and colon and rectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20: 57–69.
  29. 29. Perez CA, Pajak TF, Rubin P, Simpson JR, Mohiuddin M, et al. (1987) Long-term observations of the patterns of failure in patients with unresectable non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung treated with definitive radiotherapy. Report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer 59: 1874–1881.
  30. 30. Byhardt RW, Scott C, Sause WT, Emami B, Komaki R, et al. (1998) Response, toxicity, failure patterns, and survival in five Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials of sequential and/or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42: 469–478.
  31. 31. Andre F, Grunenwald D, Pujol JL, Girard P, Dujon A, et al. (2001) Patterns of relapse of N2 nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy: should prophylactic cranial irradiation be reconsidered? Cancer 91: 2394–2400.
  32. 32. Chen AM, Jahan TM, Jablons DM, Garcia J, Larson DA (2007) Risk of cerebral metastases and neurological death after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: clinical implications for the subsequent management of the brain. Cancer 109: 1668–1675.
  33. 33. Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M, Asbell S, Phillips T, et al. (1997) Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37: 745–751.
  34. 34. Penel N, Brichet A, Prevost B, Duhamel A, Assaker R, et al. (2001) Pronostic factors of synchronous brain metastases from lung cancer. Lung Cancer 33: 143–154.
  35. 35. Ampil F, Caldito G, Milligan S, Mills G, Nanda A (2007) The elderly with synchronous non-small cell lung cancer and solitary brain metastasis: does palliative thoracic radiotherapy have a useful role? Lung Cancer 57: 60–65.
  36. 36. Nguyen TD, DeAngelis LM (2007) Brain metastases. Neurol Clin 25: 1173–1192, x-xi.
  37. 37. Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, Flanders AE, Gaspar LE, et al. (2004) Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet 363: 1665–1672.
  38. 38. Pottgen C, Eberhardt W, Grannass A, Korfee S, Stuben G, et al. (2007) Prophylactic cranial irradiation in operable stage IIIA non small-cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: results from a German multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 25: 4987–4992.
  39. 39. Yavuz AA, Topkan E, Onal C, Yavuz MN (2008) Prophylactic cranial irradiation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: outcome of recursive partitioning analysis group 1 patients. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 27: 80.
  40. 40. Gore EM, Bae K, Wong SJ, Sun A, Bonner JA, et al. (2011) Phase III comparison of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: primary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group study RTOG 0214. J Clin Oncol 29: 272–278.
  41. 41. Hu Z, Huo X, Lu D, Qian J, Zhou J, et al. (2005) Functional polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinase-9 are associated with risk of occurrence and metastasis of lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11: 5433–5439.
  42. 42. Fang SM, Jin X, Li Y, Wang R, Guo W, et al. (2005) [Correlation of matrix metalloproteinase-3 polymorphism to genetic susceptibility and lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer]. Ai Zheng 24: 305–310.
  43. 43. Yoon SM, Hong YC, Park HJ, Lee JE, Kim SY, et al. (2005) The polymorphism and haplotypes of XRCC1 and survival of non-small-cell lung cancer after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63: 885–891.
  44. 44. Hasegawa Y, Takanashi S, Kanehira Y, Tsushima T, Imai T, et al. (2001) Transforming growth factor-beta1 level correlates with angiogenesis, tumor progression, and prognosis in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 91: 964–971.
  45. 45. Kong F, Jirtle RL, Huang DH, Clough RW, Anscher MS (1999) Plasma transforming growth factor-beta1 level before radiotherapy correlates with long term outcome of patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer 86: 1712–1719.
  46. 46. Domagala-Kulawik J, Hoser G, Safianowska A, Grubek-Jaworska H, Chazan R (2006) Elevated TGF-beta1 concentration in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with primary lung cancer. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 54: 143–147.
  47. 47. Awad MR, El-Gamel A, Hasleton P, Turner DM, Sinnott PJ, et al. (1998) Genotypic variation in the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene: association with transforming growth factor-beta1 production, fibrotic lung disease, and graft fibrosis after lung transplantation. Transplantation 66: 1014–1020.
  48. 48. Grainger DJ, Heathcote K, Chiano M, Snieder H, Kemp PR, et al. (1999) Genetic control of the circulating concentration of transforming growth factor type beta1. Hum Mol Genet 8: 93–97.
  49. 49. Mu L, Katsaros D, Lu L, Preti M, Durando A, et al. (2008) TGF-beta1 genotype and phenotype in breast cancer and their associations with IGFs and patient survival. Br J Cancer 99: 1357–1363.