Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Transcriptome Sequencing and De Novo Analysis of a Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Its Near-Isogenic Restorer Line in Chili Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

  • Chen Liu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Chen Liu, Ning Ma

    Affiliation China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

  • Ning Ma ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Chen Liu, Ning Ma

    Affiliation China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

  • Ping-Yong Wang,

    Affiliation China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

  • Nan Fu,

    Affiliation China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

  • Huo-Lin Shen

    Affiliation China Agricultural University, Beijing, China



The use of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) in F1 hybrid seed production of chili pepper is increasingly popular. However, the molecular mechanisms of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration remain poorly understood due to limited transcriptomic and genomic data. Therefore, we analyzed the difference between a CMS line 121A and its near-isogenic restorer line 121C in transcriptome level using next generation sequencing technology (NGS), aiming to find out critical genes and pathways associated with the male sterility.


We generated approximately 53 million sequencing reads and assembled de novo, yielding 85,144 high quality unigenes with an average length of 643 bp. Among these unigenes, 27,191 were identified as putative homologs of annotated sequences in the public protein databases, 4,326 and 7,061 unigenes were found to be highly abundant in lines 121A and 121C, respectively. Many of the differentially expressed unigenes represent a set of potential candidate genes associated with the formation or abortion of pollen.


Our study profiled anther transcriptomes of a chili pepper CMS line and its restorer line. The results shed the lights on the occurrence and recovery of the disturbances in nuclear-mitochondrial interaction and provide clues for further investigations.


Chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is a member of the Solanaceae family. Originated from South America, it has become an economically significant vegetable and an agriculturally important plant worldwide, particularly in China and Korea [1][5]. The heterosis of pepper is very obvious: the average yield of hybrids is 30% more than that of common cultivars [6][8]. At present, hybrid seed production mainly relies on manual pollination, which is not only costly but also difficult to ensure seed purity. Therefore, more and more researchers and breeders tend to the male sterile line and study its application in hybrid seed production.

Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), resulted from disturbed mitochondrial–nuclear interaction, was a failure to produce functional pollen that can be suppressed or counteracted by nuclear genes known as restorer-of-fertility (Rf) genes [9][11]. It is widely accepted that CMS is closely related to mitochondrial genome rearrangement, and many trait-determining mitochondrial genes could be suppressed or activated by Rf genes [9], [12]. In addition to naturally occurring, CMS could be created by either sexual crossing or protoplast fusion [9]. In chili pepper, CMS was first documented in the PI 164835 line from India [13], whose cytoplasm has been used as the only source for CMS. To date, it has been reported two determinants, atp6-2 and orf456 [14], [15], and two markers of CMS-specific sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) [16]. For Rf genes, previous study has shown that they mainly scatter in chili pepper, but seldom in sweet pepper [17]. One major QTL for fertility restoration was mapped to chromosome P6 [18], and several markers flanking the major restorer gene have been identified [6], [19][22]. However these markers have limited applications in pepper lines due to low reproducibility and the failure of PCR amplification [23]. Besides, a CAPS marker linked to the partial restoration (pr) locus has been developed [24].

Near-isogenic lines (NILs) are a pair of lines with identical genetic backgrounds, except for a region near the target gene [25], [26]. Particularly, NILs are generated by crossing a donor line carried the gene of interest to a recurrent parent and then backcrossing to the recurrent parent for six to eight generations [27]. Pairs of NILs are useful and valuable materials for screening molecular markers linked with target genes and isolating critical genes associated with interested traits. We have used NILs to analyze differently expressed genes between CMS lines and its near-isogenic lines in pepper [28][30].

The throughput of sequencing has been improved greatly and cycle time of sequencing has been significantly shortened due to the emergence and development of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology. The NGS technology, namely RNA-Seq, is efficient and inexpensive to analyze transcriptome in a comprehensive and in-depth way [31], [32], and has provided new insights into the whole transcriptome. It offers an opportunity to identify critical genes related to a certain character from the numerous molecular markers or the differentially expressed genes discovered. Information of the developmentally and environmentally induced differentially expressed genes can also be used to predict interactions of individual genes, as well as to elucidate more complicated signaling pathways as well as potential cross-talks between these pathways [33].

Chili pepper is a diplont plant (2n = 24) with a reported genome size about 3,753–4,763 million base pairs [34]. Since the chili pepper genome is not currently available, transcriptomic data can help to identify the genes and gene families involved in important biological processes. To date, several studies of RNA sequencing on peppers have been reported [35][40]. However, most of these studies were mainly focus on the developing molecular markers.

To characterize the anther transcriptomes of chili pepper and seek genes involved in fertility determination, transcripts from the CMS line 121A and its restorer line 121C were isolated, quantified and sequenced. These transcriptomic sequences were then assembled by Trinity and annotated by BLASTing against public databases. Subsequently, the annotated sequences were clustered into putative functional categories using the Gene Ontology (GO) framework and grouped into pathways using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Finally, differentially abundant unigenes were analyzed, and part of the results was validated by relative RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR. This study presents the first broadly survey of CMS line and the restorer line in chili pepper with RNA-Seq analysis.

Results and Discussion

Illumina Sequencing and de novo Assembly

Though criteria for gametophyte development was available in model plant Arabidopsis [41], [42], the pivotal time-point for pepper stamen development is still unclear. To obtain as many of the genes expressed during anther development as possible, RNA was isolated from five different development phases of microspore and mixed equally for the generation of cDNA library. The two cDNA libraries separately constructed from 121A and 121C were sequenced using the Illumina platform. After cleaning and quality check, 53 million 100bp paired-end reads were assembled into 85,144 unigenes with an average length of 643 bp (Table 1).

Table 1. Statistical summary of the chili pepper transcriptome.

Gene Prediction

Gene prediction was conducted using the ‘GetORF’ software for the 85,144 unigenes, 84,793 of which contain protein coding sequences. The average length of the remaining 351 unigenes is 233 bp. This may be due to the fact that they are too short that cover only Untranslated Regions (UTR).

Annotation of Predicted Proteins

In total, 27,191 (32%) unigenes were significantly matched to known genes in the public databases (Table S1). In fact, “non-BLASTable” sequences have been reported in all studies regarding plant transcriptomes. However, due to the differences in species, the sequencing depth and the parameters of the BLAST search, the proportion of “non-BLASTable” sequences range from 13 to 80% [43][46].

Consistent with other reports [47], [48], assembled sequences in the present study also showed that the longer the sequences had the higher match proportion in database. Match efficiency was 95.10% for sequences longer than 2,000 bp, but was 39.58% and 15.65% for sequences 500–1,000 bp and 100–500 bp in length, respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Comparison of unigene length between hit and no-hit unigenes.

In addition, we compared the pepper transcriptome with all the ESTs of Capsicum annuum in NCBI and tomato coding sequences (CDS) from ITAG2.3 annotation release in SGN. 3,385 (3.98%) and 4,993 (5.86%) of the unigenes match with the Capsicum annuum ESTs and tomato coding sequences, respectively, and when do the comparison conversely we got a similar result with 3,383 (3.97%) for the Capsicum annuum ESTs and 5,006 (5.88%) for tomato coding sequences.

KOG Annotation

Out of 85,144 assembled unigenes, 35,393 unigenes were classified into 25 KOG categories (Figure 2), among which “Signal transduction mechanisms” represented the largest group (4,656, 13.16%), followed by “General function prediction only” (4,176, 11.80%), “Function unknown” (3,157, 8.92%) and “Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones” (2,917, 8.24%). “Nuclear structure” (234, 0.66%), “Extracellular structures” (182, 0.51%) and “Cell motility” (46, 0.13%) were the smallest groups.

Figure 2. KOG functional classifications of the Capsicum annuum L. anther transcriptome.

Gene Ontology (GO) Annotation

A total of 9,896 unigenes were assigned to 58 functional groups using GO assignment (Figure 3). In each of the three main categories (cellular component, molecular function and biological progress) of the GO classification, the dominant terms were “cell”, “binding” and “cellular process”, respectively. “Intracellular”, “catalytic activity” and “metabolic process” were also well represented. However, few genes were assigned to the terms “proteinaceous extracellular matrix & cell surface”, “translation regulator activity” and “extracellular structure organization”.

Figure 3. Gene Ontology classification of assembled unigenes.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway Mapping

Functional classification and pathway assignment were performed by KEGG (Table S2). In total, 2,740 unigenes were assigned to 300 KEGG pathways. The pathways with most representation by the unigenes were ribosome (163), purine metabolism (114), spliceosome (106), starch and sucrose metabolism (99), RNA transport (99) and pyrimidine metabolism (97).

Gene Expression Analysis

After calculation, expression of each unigene was obtained. Using the restorer line as a reference, 4,326 up-regulated unigenes (with higher expressions in the sterile line) and 7,061 down-regulated unigenes (with higher expressions in the restorer line) were identified (Table S3). Results showed that the number of down-regulated unigenes was obviously larger than that of up-regulated unigenes (Figure 4). In addition, 9,224 and 13,568 specific unigenes were found in the sterile line and the restorer line, respectively (Figure 5).

Figure 4. Changes of transcript abundance levels between 121A and 121C.

Figure 5. Numbers of unigenes expressed in 121A and 121C.

To evaluate the validity of Illumina analysis and to further assess the patterns of differential gene expression, several unigenes from our sequencing results were selected and detected by RT-PCR and qRT-PCR (Table 2) with unigene-specific primers (Table S4). For real-time RT-PCR (Figure 6), this study selected unigenes with known function like ATP binding protein, pentatricopeptide (PPR) repeat-containing protein, MADS-box transcription factor and the others. In contrast to the Illumina data, the highest up-regulation of comp66553_c0_seq1 was observed with almost 263-fold in 121C, while the transcript abundance of comp62432_c0_seq1 was induced by approximately 188-fold, lower than that of comp66553_c0_seq1. Most selected unigenes (e.g. comp215802_c0_seq1, comp198237_c0_seq1, comp54012_c0_seq1, comp56601_c0_seq1, comp71609_c0_seq1, comp66553_c0_seq1, comp62048_c0_seq1 and comp62432_c0_seq1) showed lower changes when compared with Illumina sequencing. Furthermore, 8 “non-BLASTable” unigenes were selected randomly for relative RT-PCR (Figure 7). The log2ratios for comp54630_c1_seq1 and comp60513_c2_seq1 were −2.6 and −7.9, respectively. In contrast to the Illumina data, expression difference of comp54630_c1_seq1 between the two materials was more obvious than that of comp60513_c2_seq1 when using relative RT-PCR. However, the trend of higher abundance in the restorer line was consistent between sequencing and relative RT-PCR. Taken together, the expression patterns of these genes in 121A and 121C are consistent with the Illumina data. RT-PCR results basically confirmed the reliability of our transcriptome analysis. However, the two techniques essentially use different algorithms, which may explain the above-mentioned some inconsistent results [49][51].

Figure 6. Relative expressions of the twelve selected known function unigenes detected by real-time RT-PCR.

The transcript levels were normalized with actin gene, and the level of each unigene in 121A was set at 1.0. Error bars represent the SE for three independent experiments. The unigene expression in Illumina experiment and the descriptions are listed in Table 2. The primers used for each gene are listed in Table S4.

Figure 7. Expression profiles of the eight selected unknown function unigenes detected by relative RT-PCR.

The actin gene was used as the control, and a total of three independent experiments were carried out. The descriptions and primers of Illumina experiment are listed in Table 2 and Table S4, respectively.

Table 2. List of the differentially expressed unigenes selected for confirmation by RT–PCR.

All unigenes showing significant differences in transcript abundance between the two materials were mapped to the GO and KEGG pathway database. Differently expressed unigenes obviously enriched in four GO terms, i.e. “extracellular”, “ion transporter activity”, “lyase activity” and “transporter activity” (Table 3). Twenty KEGG pathways with enrichment of differently expressed unigenes were also found (Table 4), among which the top three pathways that cover the most differentially expressed unigenes were starch and sucrose metabolism (41), oxidative phosphorylation (40) and plant-pathogen interaction (28).

Table 3. Differentially expressed unigenes significantly enriched GO.

Table 4. Differentially expressed unigenes significantly enriched pathways.

Some genes among the differentially expressed unigenes are associated with molecular pathology, though we collected samples from asymptomatic plants. In addition, it has reported that restorer genotype for male sterile cytoplasm of genetic resources was moderately resistant to phytophthora capsici, which implied some differentially expressed unigenes may be associated with both molecular pathology and restoration of fertility [52].

Analysis of Candidate Male Sterile Genes

Previous studies proved the sharply decreased content of ATP in the male sterile line [53] and its level was much lower than that in the maintainer line [54]. Many mitochondrial genes related to male sterility turned out to be involved in the mutation of ATP synthase subunits [55], such as the rape atp6 gene of Polilma CMS [56], the sunflower atp4 gene [57], the radish atp8 gene of Ogura CMS [58] and the petunia atp9 gene [59], etc. Also a gene named atp6-2 [14] was found to be related to male sterility in pepper. Our study identified 39 unigenes associated with ATP synthase including ATP synthase subunit, among which 4 unigenes showed high abundance in 121A while 6 in 121C.

Cytochrome oxidase is the marker enzyme of mitochondrial inner membrane with strong activity. It plays important role in the mitochondrial respiratory chain electron transfer system and affects plant cell respiration. For the 18 cytochrome oxidase-related unigenes found in the present study, 2 and 7 unigenes were highly abundant in 121A and 121C, respectively. Many studies have shown that cytochrome oxidase is relevant to CMS in plants [60][62], and the open reading frame orf456 found in pepper coxII gene is closely related to CMS [15].

Analysis of Candidate Fertility Restorer Gene

The PPR (pentatricopeptide repeat) gene family is a large gene family characterized by the presence of tandem arrays of a degenerate 35-amino-acid repeat [63]. Due to its essential roles in mitochondria and chloroplasts, the PPR has received the enormous attention. Many restorer genes, including the radish Rfo gene [64], the rice Rf-1 gene [65] and the petunia Rf-PPR592 gene [66], etc., encode proteins of PPRs. Among 463 PPR unigenes found in the present study, 17 and 9 unigenes were highly abundant in 121A and 121C, respectively.

Analysis of Other Candidate Male Fertility-related Genes

Since the abnormal development of anther or pollen is the immediate cause of male sterility, proteins related to anther and pollen may have close relationships with fertility. We found 2 anther specific proteins were more abundant in 121C than in 121A. Proteins related to pollen, including major pollen allergen, pollen coat-like protein and pollen-specific protein, were notably represented among 121C transcripts, with 13 highly abundant unigenes compared with 1 abundant unigene in 121A.

The abnormity of activated oxygen metabolism in the development of anther or young panicle may be associated with male sterility [67][72]. The differences of activated oxygen metabolism were compared between the three-lines of CMS [73], [74], but the influence of oxygen metabolism on fertility remains unknown. As active oxygen scavengers of plant, 10 and 7 peroxidase-associated unigenes were found up-regulated in 121A and 121C, respectively. Among the unigenes annotated as catalase gene, 1 was highly abundant in 121A and 2 in 121C. For superoxide dismutase-related unigenes, only 1 showed high abundance in 121A. All the 3 polyphenol oxidase unigenes in our results were differentially abundant unigenes with 2 highly abundant in121A and 1 in 121C.

It's lack of soluble sugar in the male sterile lines, like pepper [75], cabbage [76] and rape [77]. Gluconeogenesis is an important pathway to generate sugar in plant, in which malate dehydrogenase and aspartate aminotransferase play important roles. Our results showed that 1 malate dehydrogenase-associated unigene was highly abundant in 121A but 4 in 121C, and 1 aspartate aminotransferase unigene was highly abundant in 121C.

Insufficiency or deviation of RNA editing may form improper editing products and therefore hinder the proper functions that generate CMS [78], [79]. We found 6 highly abundant splicing factors in 121A and 1 in 121C.

The MADS-box gene family is a regulatory gene family with specific sequence in plants. Proteins coded by this gene family play important roles in regulation of growth and development of plants. It regulates the development of roots, leaves, fruits and flowers [80] with different spatial and temporal expression profiles during development of floral meristems and floral organs [81]. We found 4 and 5 highly abundant unigenes with MADS-box domain in 121A and 121C, respectively.

The F-box proteins with F-box domain can identify substrates in the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis pathways, and play important roles in cell cycle, signal transduction, transcription, programmed cell death and male sterility [82]. We found 21 highly abundant F-box unigenes in 121A and 38 in 121C.


In the present study, we not only profiled the transcriptome of pepper anther, but also analyzed differentially abundant unigenes between a pepper CMS line 121A and its near-isogenic restorer line 121C. The total 5.3 Gb data were assembled into 85,144 unigenes. We assembled 71,576 and 75,920 unigenes from 121A and 121C, respectively. 4,326 and 7,061 unigenes were found highly abundant in lines 121A and 121C, respectively. After further enrichment analysis, we identified three enriched pathways that cover the most differentially abundant unigenes. Our results provide a global look at the differences between the pepper CMS line and its near-isogenic restorer line, and laid the foundation for identifying new fertility-associated genes and elucidating the mechanisms of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility recovery.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and RNA Extraction

The pepper CMS line 121A and its near-isogenic restorer line 121C were selected as materials for RNA sequencing. They were drawn from a backcross program [83]. Line 121A was from a backcross between chili pepper advanced inbred lines 121 and 8907A. In order to get the corresponding restorer line 121C, 8907A was crossed to “big gold bullion” with single dominant restorer gene. It was followed by backcrossing repeatedly with advanced inbred line 121. The cytoplasmic source of the CMS line and restorer line was derived from 8907A and a minimum of seven backcrosses was made. In consequence, the CMS line and restorer line had the similar cytoplasmic genetic background. In addition, it’s believed that they had the identical nuclear genetic background except for the restorer gene locus. Both lines were grown in the Shangzhuang experimental station of China Agricultural University under standard greenhouse condition during spring in 2011.

Flower buds were collected from each of the 20 individuals of 121A and that of 121C, respectively. And collected flower buds were divided into five phases according to the relevance between development phases of microspore and morphological characteristics of floral organs (see Figure 8 for details) [84]. Anthers of the five phases were taken out and frozen in liquid nitrogen. All samples were stored at −80°C until RNA extraction.

Figure 8. Examples of sampled flower buds.

Phase 1–Phase 5. Representative flower buds collected to produce the samples. Phase 1: Buds were small; sepals wrapped corolla. Phase 2: Buds were a little larger; sepals opened slightly on the top end; the length of sepals was slightly greater than that of petals. Phase 3: Buds swelled obviously; sepals splayed; the length of petals is about the same as or slightly larger than that of sepals. Phase 4: Buds swelled sufficiently; petals overtopped sepals distinctly; sepals attained their sizes. Phase 5: Petals attained their sizes; buds would blossom soon. The upper row was 121A.

Each frozen sample was grinded in a mortar with liquid nitrogen, and then total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) following the standard protocol. The concentration of total RNA was determined by NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, USA), and the RNA integrity value (RIN) was checked using RNA 6000 Pico LabChip of Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, USA). Then RNA of the five phases was equally mixed.

The mixed RNA was incubated with DNase I (Ambion, USA), and messenger RNA was further purified with MicroPoly(A) Purist Kit (Ambion, USA) as per the protocol and the final concentration was determined using NonoDrop.

Library Preparation

RNA was fragmented and annealed with Biotinylated Random Primers which have the Illumina adapter sequence. Then the RNA fragments were captured by Strapavidin through Biotinylated Random Primers. Another Illumina adapter was ligased to 5′RNA by RNA ligase. Reverse transcriptase was used for reverse transcription. Finally two double strand Illumina libraries were obtained by PCR amplification.

Sequencing and Data Processing

The two libraries were sequenced by Illumina paired-end sequencing technology. Raw data was scanned using Casava with default parameters, and reads with more 10% Q<20 bases were removed. All sequences smaller than 70 bases were eliminated based on the assumption that small reads might represent sequencing artifacts [85]. Then the high quality reads were assembled by Trinity with default parameters to construct unique consensus sequences [86].

Bioinformatics Analysis

After de novo assembled with Trinity, open reading frames were identified by using an in-house developed program based on ‘GetORF’ from EMBOSS [87]. Gene annotation was performed through BLASTp search against Swiss-Prot and GenBank database with E value of 10−5, and then the best one was chosen as the result of gene annotation. Comparisons with the ESTs of Capsicum annuum in NCBI and tomato CDS in SGN were performed through Perl scripts, with E value less than 10−10 and 10−20, respectively, and the proportion of the similar part larger than 80%. Gene ontology analysis was performed using GoPipe [88], BLASTP was firstly used to search against Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL database with E value of 10−5, and then the GO information was obtained according to gene2go. The metabolic pathways were constructed based on KEGG database by BBH (bi-directional best hit) method [89]. KO number of each protein was identified firstly and metabolic pathways were constructed based on the KO number then.

Gene Expression Difference Analysis

Reads number of each unigene was firstly transformed into RPKM (Reads per Kilo bases per Million reads) [90] and then differently expressed unigenes were identified by DEGseq package using the method MARS (MA-plot-based method with Random Sampling model) [91]. “FDR ≤0.001 and the absolute value of log2Ratio ≥1” was used as the threshold to judge the significance of unigene expression difference. The data analyzed have been deposited on the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus under accession no. GSE45431.

Candidate male fertility-related genes were selected according to their annotation (Table S1), and then their abundance differentiations of the two materials were obtained from the result of gene expression analysis (Table S3).

Enrichment Analysis

All unigenes showing significant transcript abundance differences between the two materials were firstly mapped to the GO and KEGG pathway databases, and then the numbers of unigenes for every GO term and KO term were calculated, respectively. Significantly enriched GO and KO terms from the set of differentially abundant unigenes were found using the hypergeometric test, for the sake of comparing these unigenes to the achieved chili pepper transcriptome background. The formula for the gene enrichment test was

in which N represents the total number of unigenes with GO and KEGG pathway annotation; n represents the number of differentially abundant unigenes in N; M represents the number of unigenes that were annotated to certain GO or KO terms; and m represents the number of differentially abundant unigenes in M. The initially obtained p-values were then adjusted using a Bonferroni Correction and a corrected p-value of 0.05 was adopted as a threshold.

Reverse Transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) Analysis

Total RNA isolated above was treated with DNase I to remove genomic DNA contamination. The first-strand cDNA synthesis and the qRT-PCR were carried out using the PrimeScript 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq™(Takara), respectively. The qRT-PCR was performed on an ABI PRISM 7500 Real-Time PCR System(Applied Biosystems, USA) with the following cycling parameters: 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of: 95°C for 5 s, 60°C 34 s. The actin (GenBank: GQ339766.1) gene was used as the internal control. Expression levels of the unigenes were calculated from the threshold cycle using the delta–delta Ct method [92]. The cycling parameters of relative RT-PCR were: 94°C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 54°C for 30 s (annealing temperatures were set according to the primers’ Tm.), 72°C for 40 s, and final elongation at 72°C for 3 min. All reactions were performed with at least three replicates.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Top BLAST hits from BLASTING Capsicum annuum L. unigenes against public databases.


Table S2.

KEGG biochemical mappings for Capsicum annuum L.


Table S3.

Differentially expressed unigenes between 121A and 121C.


Table S4.

The primer lists for unigenes used for RT-PCR.



We thank the anonymous referees and the editor for their comments and suggestions that helped improve the manuscript. We also thank the assistance provided by Xin Li and Ting Liu in performing the experiments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: H-LS CL. Performed the experiments: CL. Analyzed the data: CL NF NM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: H-LS P-YW. Wrote the paper: CL NM.


  1. 1. Bosland PW (1992) Chiles: a diverse crop. HortTechnology 2: 6–10.
  2. 2. Bosland PW, Votava EJ (2012) Peppers: vegetable and spice capsicums, 2nd Edition.
  3. 3. De AK (2003) Capsicum: the genus Capsicum.
  4. 4. Hong S-T, Chung J-E, An G, Kim S-R (1998) Analysis of 176 expressed sequence tags generated from cDNA clones of hot pepper by single-pass sequencing. Journal of Plant Biology 41: 116–124.
  5. 5. Chen CM, Hao XF, Chen GJ, Cao BH, Chen QH, et al. (2011) Characterization of a new male sterility-related gene Camf1 in Capsicum annum L. Molecular Biology Reports. 39: 737–744.
  6. 6. Zhang BX, Huang SW, Yang GM, Guo JZ (2000) Two RAPD markers linked to a major fertility restorer gene in pepper. Euphytica 113: 155–161.
  7. 7. Guo JZ, Guan JX, Ma JH (1981) A preliminary studyon the genetic performance of main agronomic traits in F1 of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). China Vegetables 1: 9–12.
  8. 8. Guo JZ, Ma JH (1984) Determination of the combining ability of several quantitative traits constituting yield. China Vegetables 3: 1–4.
  9. 9. Zheng BB, Wu XM, Ge XX, Deng XX, Grosser JW, et al. (2012) Comparative Transcript Profiling of a Male Sterile Cybrid Pummelo and Its Fertile Type Revealed Altered Gene Expression Related to Flower Development. PLoS ONE 7: e43758.
  10. 10. Chase CD (2007) Cytoplasmic male sterility: a window to the world of plant mitochondrial-nuclear interactions. Trends in Genetics 23: 81–90.
  11. 11. Linke B, Borner T (2005) Mitochondrial effects on flower and pollen development. Mitochondrion 5: 389–402.
  12. 12. Bentolila S, Stefanov S (2012) A reevaluation of rice mitochondrial evolution based on the complete sequence of male-fertile and male-sterile mitochondrialgenomes. Plant Physiology 158: 996–1017.
  13. 13. Peterson PA (1958) Cytoplasmically inherited male sterility in Capsicum. American Naturalist 92: 111–119.
  14. 14. Kim DH, Kim BD (2006) The organization of mitochondrial atp6 gene region in male fertile and CMS lines of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Current Genetics 49: 59–67.
  15. 15. Kim DH, Kang JG, Kim B-D (2007) Isolation and characterization of the cytoplasmic male sterility-associated orf456 gene of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Molecular Biology 63: 519–532.
  16. 16. Kim DH, Kim BD (2005) Development of SCAR markets for early identification of cytoplasmic male sterility genotype in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Molecules and Cells 20: 416–422.
  17. 17. Wang S-b, Liu J-b, Pan B-g (2007) Inheritance and distribution of fertility restoring gene of cytoplasmic male sterile pepper. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 22: 86–89.
  18. 18. Wang LH, Zhang BX, Lefebvre V, Huang SW, Daubeze AM, et al. (2004) QTL analysis of fertility restoration in cytoplasmic male sterile pepper. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 1058–1063.
  19. 19. Kim DS, Kim DH, Yoo JH, Kim BD (2006) Cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers linked to the fertility restorer gene in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Molecules and Cells 21: 135–140.
  20. 20. Lee J, Yoon JB, Park HG (2008) Linkage analysis between the partial restoration (pr) and the restorer-of-fertility (Rf) loci in pepper cytoplasmic male sterility. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117: 383–389.
  21. 21. Jo YD, Kim YM, Park MN, Yoo JH, Park M, et al. (2010) Development and evaluation of broadly applicable markers for Restorer-of-fertility in pepper. Molecular Breeding 25: 187–201.
  22. 22. Gulyas G, Pakozdi K, Lee JS, Hirata Y (2006) Analysis of fertility restoration by using cytoplasmic male-sterile red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) lines. Breeding Science 56: 331–334.
  23. 23. Min WK, Lim H, Lee YP, Sung SK, Kim BD, et al. (2008) Identification of a third haplotype of the sequence linked to the Restorer-of-fertility (Rf) gene and its implications for male-sterility phenotypes in peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). Molecules and Cells 25: 20–29.
  24. 24. Lee J, Yoon JB, Park HG (2008) A CAPS marker associated with the partial restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Molecular Breeding 21: 95–104.
  25. 25. Young ND, Zamir D, Ganal MW, Tanksley SD (1988) Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify dna markers tightly linked to the Tm-2-Alpha gene in tomato. Genetics 120: 579–585.
  26. 26. Muehlbauer GJ, Specht JE, Thomascompton MA, Staswick PE, Bernard RL (1988) NEar-isogenic lines - a potential resource in the integration of conventional and molecular marker linkage maps. Crop Science 28: 729–735.
  27. 27. Zhou RH, Zhu ZD, Kong XY, Huo NX, Tian QZ, et al. (2005) Development of wheat near-isogenic lines for powdery mildew resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 640–648.
  28. 28. Guo S, Ma N, Yang WC, Sun YJ, Shen HL (2011) Expression Analysis of Restorer Alleles-Induced Genes in Pepper. Agricultural Sciences in China 10: 1010–1015.
  29. 29. Guo S, Shen HL, Yang WC, Yang J, Wang W (2009) Isolation of fertility restoration-related ESTs in pepper cytoplasmic male sterility lines using SSH. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 36: 1443–1449.
  30. 30. Wang W, Liu C, Shen HL (2011) Construction of SSH-cDNA library for cytoplasm male sterility lines and maintainer lines in pepper. China Cucurbits and Vegetables 24: 1–5.
  31. 31. Schuster SC (2008) Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology. Nature Methods 5: 16–18.
  32. 32. Ansorge WJ (2009) Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. New Biotechnology 25: 195–203.
  33. 33. Kim KH, Kang YJ, Kim DH, Yoon MY, Moon J-K, et al. (2011) RNA-Seq Analysis of a Soybean Near-Isogenic Line Carrying Bacterial Leaf Pustule-Resistant and -Susceptible Alleles. DNA Research 18: 483–497.
  34. 34. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2005) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: Progress, problems and prospects. Annals of Botany 95: 45–90.
  35. 35. Nicolai M, Pisani C, Bouchet JP, Vuylsteke M, Palloix A (2012) Discovery of a large set of SNP and SSR genetic markers by high-throughput sequencing of pepper (Capsicum annuum). Genetics and Molecular Research 11: 43–47.
  36. 36. Gongora-Castillo E, Fajardo-Jaime R, Fernandez-Cortes A, Jofre-Garfias AE, Lozoya-Gloria E, et al. (2012) The capsicum transcriptome DB: a “hot” tool for genomic research. Bioinformation 8: 43–47.
  37. 37. Lu FH, Yoon MY, Cho YI, Chung JW, Kim KT, et al. (2011) Transcriptome analysis and SNP/SSR marker information of red pepper variety YCM334 and Taean. Scientia Horticulturae 129: 38–45.
  38. 38. Lu FH, Cho MC, Park YJ (2012) Transcriptome profiling and molecular marker discovery in red pepper, Capsicum annuum L. TF68. Molecular Biology Reports 39: 3327–3335.
  39. 39. Chen C, Liu S, Hao X, Chen G, Cao B, et al. (2012) Characterization of a Pectin Methylesterase Gene Homolog, CaPME1, Expressed in Anther Tissues of Capsicum annuum L. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 30: 403–412.
  40. 40. Liu S, Chen C, Chen G, Cao B, Chen Q, et al. (2012) RNA-sequencing tag profiling of the placenta and pericarp of pungent pepper provides robust candidates contributing to capsaicinoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 110: 111–121.
  41. 41. Qiu WM, Zhu AD, Wang Y, Chai LJ, Ge XX, et al. (2012) Comparative transcript profiling of gene expression between seedless Ponkan mandarin and its seedy wild type during floral organ development by suppression subtractive hybridization and cDNA microarray. BMC Genomics 13: 397.
  42. 42. Scott RJ, Spielman M, Dickinson HG (2004) Stamen structure and function. Plant Cell 16(Suppl): S46–S60.
  43. 43. Ness RW, Siol M, Barrett SCH (2011) De novo sequence assembly and characterization of the floral transcriptome in cross- and self-fertilizing plants. BMC Genomics 12: 298.
  44. 44. Wang XW, Luan JB, Li JM, Bao YY, Zhang CX, et al. (2010) De novo characterization of a whitefly transcriptome and analysis of its gene expression during development. BMC Genomics 11: 400.
  45. 45. Blanca J, Canizares J, Roig C, Ziarsolo P, Nuez F, et al. (2011) Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). BMC Genomics 12: 104.
  46. 46. Parchman TL, Geist KS, Grahnen JA, Benkman CW, Buerkle CA (2010) Transcriptome sequencing in an ecologically important tree species: assembly, annotation, and marker discovery. BMC Genomics 11: 180.
  47. 47. Zhang XM, Zhao L, Larson-Rabin Z, Li DZ, Guo ZH (2012) De Novo Sequencing and Characterization of the Floral Transcriptome of Dendrocalamus latiflorus (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). PloS One 7: e42082.
  48. 48. Wei W, Qi X, Wang L, Zhang Y, Hua W, et al. (2011) Characterization of the sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) global transcriptome using Illumina paired-end sequencing and development of EST-SSR markers. BMC Genomics 12: 451.
  49. 49. Tan MH, Au KF, Yablonovitch AL, Wills AE, Chuang J, et al. (2013) RNA sequencing reveals a diverse and dynamic repertoire of the Xenopus tropicalis transcriptome over development. Genome Research 23: 201–216.
  50. 50. Ekman DR, Lorenz WW, Przybyla AE, Wolfe NL, Dean JFD (2003) SAGE analysis of transcriptome responses in Arabidopsis roots exposed to 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. Plant Physiology 133: 1397–1406.
  51. 51. Wang G, Zhu Q, Meng Q, Wu C (2012) Transcript profiling during salt stress of young cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings via Solexa sequencing. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 34: 107–115.
  52. 52. Kim BS, Ahn JH, Lee JM, Park DG, Kim HY (2012) Restorer Genotype for Male Sterile Cytoplasm of Genetic Resources Moderately Resistant to Phytophthora capsici in Capsicum Pepper. Korean journal of horticultural science & technology 30: 73–78.
  53. 53. Teixeira RT, Knorpp C, Glimelius K (2005) Modified sucrose, starch, and ATP levels in two alloplasmic male-sterile lines of B-napus. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 1245–1253.
  54. 54. Wang XZ, Teng XY, Yen LF, Zhou RG (1986) The relationgship between the ATP content in anthers of maize and sorghum and cytoplasmic male-sterility. Acta Agronomica Sinca 12: 177–182.
  55. 55. Hanson MR, Bentolila S (2004) Interactions of mitochondrial and nuclear genes that affect male gametophyte development. Plant Cell 16: S154–S169.
  56. 56. Singh M, Brown GG (1991) Suppression of cytoplasmic male-sterility by nuclear genes alters expression of a novel mitochondrial gene region. Plant Cell 3: 1349–1362.
  57. 57. Moneger F, Smart CJ, Leaver CJ (1994) Nuclear restoration of cytoplasmic male-sterility in sunflower is associated with the tissue-specific regulation of a novel mitochondrial gene. Embo Journa l 13: 8–17.
  58. 58. Budar F, Pelletier G (2001) Male sterility in plants: occurrence, determinism, significance and use. Comptes Rendus De L Academie Des Sciences Serie Iii-Sciences De La Vie-Life Sciences 324: 543–550.
  59. 59. Young EG, Hanson MR (1987) A fused mitochondrial gene associated with cytoplasmic male-sterility is developmentally regulated. Cell 50: 41–49.
  60. 60. Huang J, Yang P, Li B, Huang JL, Yang P, et al. (2004) Study on the activity of several enzymes of cytoplasmic male-sterile cotton line Jin A. Cotton Science. 16: 229–232.
  61. 61. Liu Y, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhuo D (1988) Structural variance analysis of mitochondria coI and coII genes from normal and cytoplasmic male-sterile varieties of rice oryza-sativa. Acta Genetica Sinica 15: 348–354.
  62. 62. Ricard B, Lejeune B, Araya A (1986) Studies on wheat mitochondrial-DNA organization - comparison of mitochondrial-DNA from normal and cytoplasmic male sterile varieties of wheat. Plant Science 43: 141–149.
  63. 63. Small ID, Peeters N (2000) The PPR motif - a TPR-related motif prevalent in plant organellar proteins. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 25: 46–47.
  64. 64. Brown GG, Formanova N, Jin H, Wargachuk R, Dendy C, et al. (2003) The radish Rfo restorer gene of Ogura cytoplasmic male sterility encodes a protein with multiple pentatricopeptide repeats. Plant Journal 35: 262–272.
  65. 65. Akagi H, Nakamura A, Yokozeki-Misono Y, Inagaki A, Takahashi H, et al. (2004) Positional cloning of the rice Rf-1 gene, a restorer of BT-type cytoplasmic male sterility that encodes a mitochondria-targeting PPR protein. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 1449–1457.
  66. 66. Alfonso AA, Bentolila S, Hanson MR (2003) Evaluation of the fertility restoring ability of Rf-PPR592 in petunia. Philippine Agricultural Scientist 86: 303–315.
  67. 67. Zhang M, Liang C, Duan J, Huang Y, Liou H, et al. (1997) Lipid peroxidation difference in leaves, panicles and anthers of CMS rice and its maintainer. Acta Agronomica Sinica 23: 603–606.
  68. 68. Chen XF, Liang CY (1992) Energy and activated oxygen metabolisms in anthers of Hubei photoperiod-sensitive genic male-sterile rice. Acta Botanica Sinica 34: 416–425.
  69. 69. Zhang J, Zong X, Wang J, Gao D, Yu G, et al. (2001) Changes in activity of protective enzymes in the anther of thermo-photosensitive genic male sterile wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops 21: 26–30.
  70. 70. Duan J, Liang C, Zhang M, Duan J, Liang CY, et al. (1996) The relationship between membrane lipid peroxidation and cytoplasmic male sterility in maize. Plant Physiology Communications 32: 331–334.
  71. 71. Li SQ, Wan CX, Kong J, Zhang ZJ, Li YS, et al. (2004) Programmed cell death during microgenesis in a Honglian CMS line of rice is correlated with oxidative stress in mitochondria. Functional Plant Biology 31: 369–376.
  72. 72. Wan C, Li S, Wen L, Kong J, Wang K, et al. (2007) Damage of oxidative stress on mitochondria during microspores development in Honglian CMS line of rice. Plant Cell Reports 26: 373–382.
  73. 73. Deng MH, Wen JF, Huo JL, Zhu HS, Dai XZ, et al. (2012) Relationship of metabolism of reactive oxygen species with cytoplasmic male sterility in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Scientia Horticulturae 134: 232–236.
  74. 74. Zhang Z, Hou X, Zhang ZX, Hou XL (2005) Relation between cytoplasmic male sterility and reactive oxygen species metabolism in pepper. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 25: 799–802.
  75. 75. Li YY, Wei YY, Zhang RH, Lu J (2006) Studies on the Metabolism of Male Sterile Pepper in the Development of Microspore. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica 15: 134–137.
  76. 76. Wang YF, Hu CQ, Lin ZG, Li FY, Jin JK (1984) A Comparative Analysis on the Amphi-line of the Male Sterility in Brassica pekinensis, Rupr. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 11: 182–186.
  77. 77. Liu ZS, Guan CY (1990) Studies on male sterility in oilseed rape. I. A comparison of the biochemical characteristics between a Polima cytoplasmic male-sterile line of rape (Brassica napus L.) and its maintainer line. Oil Crops of China 3: 1–4.
  78. 78. Iwabuchi M, Kyozuka J, Shimamoto K (1993) Processing followed by complete editing of an altered mitochondrial atp6 RNA restores fertility of cytoplasmic male sterile rice. Embo Journal 12: 1437–1446.
  79. 79. Begu D, Graves PV, Domec C, Arselin G, Litvak S, et al. (1990) RNA editing of wheat mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit-9 - direct protein and cDNA sequencing. Plant Cell 2: 1283–1290.
  80. 80. Trevaskis B, Hemming MN, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ (2007) The molecular basis of vernalization-induced flowering in cereals. Trends in Plant Science 12: 352–357.
  81. 81. Imaizumi T, Kay SA (2006) Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence. Trends in Plant Science 11: 567–567.
  82. 82. Li L, Xia K, Fu Y, Tian Y, Li L, et al. (2010) Plant F-box protein and its biological function. Agricultural Science & Technology - Hunan 11: 9–12.
  83. 83. Shen HL, Jiang JZ, Wang ZY, Geng SS (1994) Studies on the breeding and inheritance of male-sterile lines of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Pekinensis 20: 25–30.
  84. 84. Zhang J, Gong Z, Liu K, Huang W, Li D, et al. (2007) Interrelation of cytological development period of pepper's microspore and the morphology of flower organ. Journal of Northwest A & F University - Natural Science Edition 35: 153–158.
  85. 85. Liu M, Qiao G, Jiang J, Yang H, Xie L, et al. (2012) Transcriptome Sequencing and De Novo Analysis for Ma Bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro) Using the Illumina Platform. PloS One 7: e46766.
  86. 86. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, et al. (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology 29: 644–U130.
  87. 87. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: The European molecular biology open software suite. Trends in Genetics 16: 276–277.
  88. 88. Chen ZZ, Xue CH, Zhu S, Zhou FF, Ling XFB, et al. (2005) GoPipe: Streamlined Gene Ontology annotation for batch anonymous sequences with statistics. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics 32: 187–190.
  89. 89. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Hirakawa M (2010) KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Research 38: D355–D360.
  90. 90. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nature Methods 5: 621–628.
  91. 91. Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang X (2010) DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 26: 136–138.
  92. 92. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 25: 402–408.