Figures
Abstract
Background
Previous studies provide an ambiguous picture of creatine kinase (CK) expression and activities in malignancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of serum CK level in breast cancer patients.
Patients and Methods
823 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer were consecutively recruited as cases, and 823 age-match patients with benign breast disease were selected as controls. Serum CK was analyzed by commercially available standardized methods.
Results
Serum CK level was significantly associated with breast cancer (P = 0.005) and subtypes of breast cancer, including breast cancer with diameter>2 cm (P = 0.031) and stage IIIbreast cancer (P = 0.025). The mean serum CK level in patients with>2 cm tumor was significantly lower than that in≤2 cm (P = 0.0475), and the mean serum CK level of stage III breast cancer patients was significantly lower than that of stage I and II breast cancer patients (P = 0.0246). Furthermore, a significant difference (P = 0.004) was observed between serum CK level and ERBB2+breast cancer not other molecular subtypes.
Conclusions
Serum CK levels in cases was significantly lower compared with controls. Notably, our results indicated for the first time that there was a negative correlation between serum CK levels and breast cancer stage. Serum CK level, which may reflect the status of host immunity, may be an important factor in determining breast cancer development and progression.
Citation: Pan H, Xia K, Zhou W, Xue J, Liang X, Cheng L, et al. (2013) Low Serum Creatine Kinase Levels in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE 8(4): e62112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062112
Editor: Masaharu Seno, Okayama University, Japan
Received: January 10, 2013; Accepted: March 17, 2013; Published: April 15, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Pan et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071753, 81172505, 81202077 and 81272916], the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK201058, BK2011853 and BK2011855], the Program for Development of Innovative Research Team in the First Affiliated Hospital of NJMU [IRT-008] and a project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [PAPD]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Breast cancer is a common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death among women [1]. In addition, the incidence of breast cancer continues to increase [2], [3]. Previous studies have estimated that approximately 50% of breast cancer can be attributed to well-known risk factors, such as age, family history, endocrine factors, and host factors [4], [5]. Besides, it is suggested that the immune system is involved in cancer development and progression.
A recent review implicates that immune response is a unifying and non-site specific determinant of cancer risk [6]. Epidemiological studies indicate that metastasis might be initiated already 5–7 years before diagnosis of the primary breast cancer, yet only a subset of patients develop clinically evident relapse [7]. It is speculated that the host immune response plays an important role in suppressing metastasis of breast cancer.
Creatine kinase (CK), an enzyme, is expressed by various cells and tissues [8]. In vertebrates, two cytosolic and two mitochondrial CK isoenzymes have been identified. The cytosolic CK isoforms can exist as homodimers (CK-MM and CK-BB) or a heterodimer (CK-MB). CK plays a pivotal role in energy transduction in tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands, particularly in cardiac and skeletal muscle [9], [10], [11]. Importantly, previous studies have demonstrated that CK may play an important role in immune response, including adaptive immune response and innate immune response. A previous study has demonstrated that CK-BB is an important regulator of T cell development and activation via TCR signaling [12]. What's more, CK is one of the most important biomarkers which may reflect the status of innate immunity. Previous studies indicate that amphioxus fluid CK played the immune role as an acute phase protein, and humoral fluid CK downregulated to give feedback for regulation of innate immunoprotection [13], [14]. Therefore, we speculate that CK may take part in malignancy occurrence and progression through acting in immune response.
However, previous studies provide a somewhat ambiguous picture of CK expression and activity in malignant cells and tumor-bearing animals. Some studies report the upregulation of some isoforms of CK in malignant cells [15], [16], [17]. By contrast, some other studies suggest a decrease in the activity of CK and some of its isoforms in different malignancies [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Moreover, results of previous clinical studies are also inconsistent [23], [24]. To date, the field of CK in relation to malignancy remains under intense investigation.
To the best of our knowledge, few large epidemiological studies have addressed the association between serum CK levels and breast cancer or subtypes of breast cancer until now. The present case-control study was conducted to determine the value of serum CK in breast cancer based on relatively larger samples. The association between serum CK levels and subgroups of breast cancer (different tumor stage, tumor size, lymph node involvement and molecular subtype) was also investigated.
Materials and Methods
Study population
The present case-control study was carried out in the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University. It was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital. All patients provided written informed consent for their clinical information to be reviewed by us. This study was in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.
The patients were newly diagnosed with histologically confirmed breast cancer from January 2006 to June 2011. Histological sections of all cases were reviewed by two pathologists independently. All cases were consecutively recruited without restriction of age or histological type. And all the subjects in the present study are ethnic Han Chinese coming from different families and have no blood relationship. Patients who were diagnosed with histologically confirmed specific invasive ductal carcinoma were excluded from this study due to small sample size. What's more, patients with metastasis, or prior history of other malignancies, or skeletal and cardiac muscle disease or brain disease, or liver and renal dysfunction were excluded from this study. In addition, none of the participants was receiving any drug that could influence circulating CK level. A total of 823 female patients (mean age 50.1 years, range 23–83 years) with incident breast cancer were included as cases. For each case, one age-matched control(±5 years) was chosen from patients (mean age 49.9 years, range 23 to 83 years) with histologically confirmed benign breast disease in the same period.
Data collection
Potential risk factors and clinical information were obtained by trained interviewers. The following potential risk factors were collected if available: age at diagnose, age at menarche, previous childbearing, menopausal status, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Clinical information was also obtained, including pathology (ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer), breast cancer stage (0 to III), tumor size (≤2 cm or >2 cm), lymph node involvement (negative or positive), histological grade (I to III), hormone receptor status (negative or positive), and molecular subtype (HR+/ERBB2-, triple negative, or ERBB2+).
For invasive cancers, Her2 status was checked by immunohistochemistry or FISH. If the result of immunohistochemistry was +++ or Her2 was amplified confirmed by FISH, Her2 was difined as overexpression. Otherwise, Her2 was defined as non-overexpression. ER and/or PR positive were considered as hormone receptor positive, while both ER and PR negative were considered as hormone receptor negative. HR+/ERBB2- breast cancer was defined as hormone receptor positive and Her2 negative. Triple-negative breast cancer was defined as ER, PR and Her2 were all negative. Otherwise, ERBB2+ breast cancer was defined as Her2 overexpression regardless of hormone receptor status in the present study.
Laboratory studies
Antecubital venous blood samples were collected from all subjects after fasting overnight. Blood samples were obtained from breast cancer patients before operation, chemotherapy, or other therapies. CK was analyzed by commercially available standardized methods.
Statistical analysis
Numerical data were reported as means ± standard deviation (SD). Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between serum CK levels and breast cancer risk. The analyses of ORs was adjusted for age at diagnose, age at menarche, childbearing, menopause status, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. One-way ANOVA was used to identify differences of serum CK levels among different subgroups of breast cancer. All statistical analyses were performed by using statistics software (State version 11.0, State), and all P-values were two-tailed with 5% significance levels.
Results
The clinical characteristics of all subjects are summarized in Table 1. It presents the distribution of breast cancer cases and benign breast disease controls according to age, menarche age, childbearing, menopausal status, and other selected covariates. Of these 823 breast cancer patients, 24 patients were diagnosed with DCIS, and 799 with invasive breast cancer according to the NCCN guideline. Cases and controls were well matched on age (P = 0.921). In addition, no significant differences were observed between cases and controls with regards to menarche age and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.2189 and P = 0.954, respectively). However, compared with benign breast disease controls, more postmenopausal subjects (P = 0.004), fewer hypertension subjects (P = 0.036) were reported in breast cancer cases. Furthermore, significant difference of childbearing status was observed between the two groups (P = 0.0471).
The mean serum CK levels in subtypes of breast cancer
The mean serum CK levels in breast cancer cases stratified according to several clinical variables as presented in Table 2. It is observed that there were no significant differences in serum CK levels among breast cancer patients with different pathology (P = 0.5687), grade (P = 0.5260), hormone receptor status (P = 0.3557), and molecular subtype (P = 0.1992). Furthermore, a borderline significant difference in serum CK levels was observed between breast cancer patients with or without lymph node involvement (P = 0.0687). Interestingly, we found that the mean serum CK level in patients with>2 cm tumor was significantly lower than that in patients with≤2 cm tumors (72.95±34.20 U/L and 78.40±38.23 U/L, respectively, P = 0.0475). Moreover, patients with stage III breast cancer also showed a significantly lower serum CK levels than patients with stage I and II breast cancer (69.95±32.52 U/L and 77.04±36.94 U/L, respectively, P = 0.0246).
Multivariate analysis of breast cancer risk
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to evaluate the relationship between selected variables and the risk of breast cancer (DCIS and invasive breast cancer included). ORs and 95% CIs of clinical variables for breast cancer are shown in Table 3. There was a significant association between breast cancer risk and decreased serum CK levels (OR = 0.9955, 95% CI = 0.9924–0.9986, P = 0.005). Postmenopausal patients showed a significantly higher breast cancer risk than premenopausal patients (OR = 3.18, 95% CI = 2.04–4.97, P<0.001). However, no significant association was observed between breast cancer risk and other clinical variables (all P>0.05), including age at diagnose, age at menarche, previous childbearing, diabetes mellitus and hypertension.
Risk of subtype-specific breast cancer in relation to serum CK
Furthermore, we evaluated the association between serum CK levels and breast cancer risk stratified by breast cancer stage, tumor size, lymph node involvement, grade, hormone receptor status, and molecular subtype. As shown in Table 4, significant association between serum CK levels and breast cancer risk was observed regardless of lymph node involvement, grade and hormone receptor status (all P<0.05). In multivariate logistic analysis, there was a significant association between serum CK levels and breast cancer with diameter>2 cm (OR = 0.9955, 95% CI = 0.9915–0.9996, P = 0.031), but not breast cancer with diameter≤2 cm (OR = 0.9967, 95% CI = 0.9926–1.0007, P = 0.105). Furthermore, a significant association was also observed between serum CK levels and stage III breast cancer (OR = 0.9928, 95% CI = 0.9865–0.9991, P = 0.025), but not stage 0 (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.9962–1.0113, P = 0.331), stage I(OR = 0.9948, 95% CI = 0.9896–1.0000, P = 0.055), and stage II (OR = 0.9977, 95% CI = 0.9940–1.0015, P = 0.240) breast cancer. For molecular subtype, the significant association between serum CK levels and ERBB2+breast cancer was observed (OR = 0.9907, 95% CI = 0.9843–0.9971, P = 0.004), and no significant association was observed between serum CK levels and the other two subtypes of breast cancer (both P = 0.123).
Discussion
The present study is the largest available study on the association of serum CK levels and breast cancer. Our results revealed that serum CK levels in breast cancer patients were significantly lower compared with patients with benign breast disease. Significant association between serum CK levels and breast cancer was observed regardless of lymph node involvement, grade and hormone receptor status. Notably, our results indicated for the first time that there was a negative correlation between serum CK levels and tumor size. The same negative correlation was also observed between serum CK levels and breast cancer stage. In subgroup multivariate analysis, serum CK levels were significantly associated with breast cancer with larger tumor size(>2 cm) and advanced stage (stage III). Furthermore, serum CK levels were significantly associated with ERBB2+ breast cancer not HR+/ERBB2- or triple negative breast cancer.
CK plays a key role in the energy homeostasis of excitable cells by the connecting the sites of ATP generation and consumption and buffering the intracellular ATP/ADP ration [25]. It participates in many vital physiological processes [12], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. Interestingly, it is worth noting that several studies demonstrated dysregulation of CK in different malignancies. Brett Delahunt and colleges reported the clinical usefulness of CK and the isoenzyme CK-MB as tumor markers for Wilms tumor in two cases. They found that serum CK and CK-MB levels were significantly elevated in both cases [23]. On the contrary, another study suggested that CK activity gradually decreased progressively in the muscles with the progression of malignancy and even non-detectable in the final stage of dedifferentiation. Low levels of CK may represent a general trend in cancer favoring pathways towards tumorigenesis [24]. It will be interesting to determine whether the downregulation of CK could be observed in other cancers growing in non-muscle tissue [31].
Previous studies provide an ambiguous picture of CK expression and activities in breast cancer [32], [33], [34]. However, none of previous studies is a large epidemiological study investigating the association between serum CK levels and breast cancer. In the present study, we demonstrated for the first time that serum CK levels decreased in breast cancer patients in a case-control study with relative large sample size. However, the role of serum CK in breast cancer remains unclear and the mechanisms responsible for lower serum CK levels needs to be elucidated.
We hypothesize that low serum CK levels in breast cancer cases may attribute to the host immune response. It is known to all that the immune system protects the host from the infection or disease by innate and adaptive responses [35]. Furthermore, immune response is an important factor in determining tumor development, progression and metastasis, contributing to tumor escape and failure of therapies [36], [37]. Importantly, previous studies suggested CK was considered to take part in immune response. As reported, CK-BB was demonstrated to be an important regulator of T cell development and activation [12]. The intracellular ATP concentration and the ATP regeneration capacity of T cells were considered to have strong impact on TCR signal strength [38], [39]. Moreover, it has been reported that CK helps keep the ATP pool constant [40], [41], [42]. Therefore, we infer that CK takes an important part in immune response affecting breast cancer development and progression, and decreased serum CK levels may reflect the status of immunity of the host.
Interestingly, there was a negative correlation between serum CK levels and tumor size or breast cancer stage. So it is speculated that the lower the CK levels, the poorer the host immunity to malignancy was, contributing to tumor progression. As reported, CK is an important regulator of T cell development and activation which is an important factor in immune response. It is reported that ectopic expression of CK-BB led to increase ATP level and enhance phosphorylation of the TCR signaling proteins. CK-BB was demonstrated to enhance the magnitude of tyrosine phosphorylation of Lck and Zap70, and to increase the phosphorylation of p38, JNK and Erk1/2 in the presence of TCR stimulation. In addition, TCR-induced Ca2+ mobilization was also enhanced. And the activation, proliferation and cytokine secretion of T cells were also enhanced by the expression of CK-BB. Thus, CK-BB plays an important role in regulating thymocyte development and T cell activation via modulating TCR signal strength [12]. T lymphocytes infiltrate extensively to higher grade DCIS and invasive carcinomas [43]. Intrathymic T cell development is critical for the establishment of a properly functioning immune response. In rapidly proliferating tumors, the presence of T lymphocytes at tumor sites is a good prognostic indicator when compared with nonimmunogenic tumors, and correlates with auxillary lymph node negativity, a smaller tumor diameter and a lower histological grade [44]. Therefore, low CK levels may reflect the poor immune response status, thus cause breast cancer development and progression, like advanced stage and large tumor size. However, in our present study, a borderline significant difference of serum CK levels was observed between patients with lymph node positive and negative due to small sample size.
In addition, it is observed for the first time that serum CK levels were significantly associated with ERBB2+ breast cancer, but not other molecular subtypes. Since 1994, several studies have shown the presence of immune response against Her2 in patients with ERBB2+ breast cancer [45]. The immune response can be associated with slower tumor development at early stage of the disease [46]. We may assume that immune response may play a specific role in ERBB2+ breast cancer, relating to serum CK. However, the exact underlying mechanisms are not clear, and should be investigated in the future.
There are some limitations in our study. First, as a retrospective case-control study, we can't rule out research bias. Second, although our present study is the largest available to date on the association of serum CK levels and breast cancer, the sample size is still relatively small. Third, the causal relationship between serum CK levels and breast cancer is not exact clear. We hypothesized that low serum CK levels may lead to breast cancer development and progression, but future prospective study with larger sample size should be carried to draw definitive conclusions.
In conclusion, the present study is the largest one to investigate the association between serum CK levels and breast cancer. Our results revealed that the serum CK levels in breast cancer patients, especially ERBB2+ breast cancer, were significantly lower compared with patients with benign breast disease. And there was a negative correlation between CK levels and breast cancer stage or tumor size. Low serum CK level may be a marker of advanced breast cancer. The present study seemed to support a protective effect of serum CK for breast cancer. Furthermore, serum CK level is supposed to be used as an important factor in determining breast cancer development and progression. However, future experimental and prospective studies are warranted to confirm the results.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: X. Liu HP KX WZ SW. Performed the experiments: HP WZ JX X. Liang L. Cheng NW ML DW LL QD L. Chen XZ SW. Analyzed the data: HP WZ. Wrote the paper: HP WZ KX.
References
- 1. DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A (2011) Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 61: 409–418.
- 2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 55: 74–108.
- 3. Benson JR, Jatoi I (2012) The global breast cancer burden. Future oncology 8: 697–702.
- 4. Madigan MP, Ziegler RG, Benichou J, Byrne C, Hoover RN (1995) Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87: 1681–1685.
- 5. Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG (2010) Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102: 680–691.
- 6. Cramer DW, Finn OJ (2011) Epidemiologic perspective on immune-surveillance in cancer. Current opinion in immunology 23: 265–271.
- 7. Engel J, Eckel R, Kerr J, Schmidt M, Furstenberger G, et al. (2003) The process of metastasisation for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 39: 1794–1806.
- 8. Wallimann T, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Schlattner U (2011) The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine. Amino Acids 40: 1271–1296.
- 9. Wallimann T, Hemmer W (1994) Creatine kinase in non-muscle tissues and cells. Mol Cell Biochem 133–134: 193–220.
- 10. Wallimann T, Turner DC, Eppenberger HM (1977) Localization of creatine kinase isoenzymes in myofibrils. I. Chicken skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 75: 297–317.
- 11. Pickering L, Pang H, Biemann K, Munro H, Schimmel P (1985) Two tissue-specific isozymes of creatine kinase have closely matched amino acid sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 2310–2314.
- 12. Zhang Y, Li H, Wang X, Gao X, Liu X (2009) Regulation of T cell development and activation by creatine kinase B. PLoS One 4: e5000.
- 13. Gao YY, Zhang DF, Li H, Liu R, Zhuang ZH, et al. (2007) Proteomic approach for caudal trauma-induced acute phase proteins reveals that creatine kinase is a key acute phase protein in amphioxus humoral fluid. J Proteome Res 6: 4321–4329.
- 14. Zhang HL, Liu XJ, Zhang BW, Peng XX, Li H (2012) Amphioxus CaVPT and creatine kinase are crucial immune-related molecules in response to bacterial infection and immunization. Fish Shellfish Immunol 33: 1139–1148.
- 15. Dinning JS, Seager LD (1951) An elevated excretion of creatine associated with leukemia in mice. Science 114: 502–503.
- 16. Yanokura M, Tsukada K (1982) Decreased activities of glycine and guanidinoacetate methyltransferases and increased levels of creatine in tumor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 104: 1464–1469.
- 17. Yanokura M, Sawai Y, Tsukada K (1984) The uptake of creatine by various tissues from a mouse bearing tumor cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 797: 94–98.
- 18. Tsung SH (1983) Creatine kinase activity and isoenzyme pattern in various normal tissues and neoplasms. Clin Chem 29: 2040–2043.
- 19. Joseph J, Cardesa A, Carreras J (1997) Creatine kinase activity and isoenzymes in lung, colon and liver carcinomas. Br J Cancer 76: 600–605.
- 20. Kinoshita Y, Yokota A (1997) Absolute concentrations of metabolites in human brain tumors using in vitro proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. NMR Biomed 10: 2–12.
- 21. Lehnhardt FG, Bock C, Rohn G, Ernestus RI, Hoehn M (2005) Metabolic differences between primary and recurrent human brain tumors: a 1H NMR spectroscopic investigation. NMR Biomed 18: 371–382.
- 22. Onda T, Uzawa K, Endo Y, Bukawa H, Yokoe H, et al. (2006) Ubiquitous mitochondrial creatine kinase downregulated in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 94: 698–709.
- 23. Delahunt B, Lewis ME, Pringle KC, Wiltshire EJ, Crooke MJ (2001) Serum creatine kinase levels parallel the clinical course for rhabdomyomatous Wilms tumor. American journal of clinical pathology 116: 354–359.
- 24. Patra S, Bera S, SinhaRoy S, Ghoshal S, Ray S, et al. (2008) Progressive decrease of phosphocreatine, creatine and creatine kinase in skeletal muscle upon transformation to sarcoma. The FEBS journal 275: 3236–3247.
- 25. Wallimann T, Wyss M, Brdiczka D, Nicolay K, Eppenberger HM (1992) Intracellular compartmentation, structure and function of creatine kinase isoenzymes in tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands: the 'phosphocreatine circuit' for cellular energy homeostasis. Biochem J 281 (Pt 1): 21–40.
- 26. Chen Z, Zhao TJ, Li J, Gao YS, Meng FG, et al. (2011) Slow skeletal muscle myosin-binding protein-C (MyBPC1) mediates recruitment of muscle-type creatine kinase (CK) to myosin. Biochem J 436: 437–445.
- 27. Zhao TJ, Yan YB, Liu Y, Zhou HM (2007) The generation of the oxidized form of creatine kinase is a negative regulation on muscle creatine kinase. J Biol Chem 282: 12022–12029.
- 28. Streijger F, Pluk H, Oerlemans F, Beckers G, Bianco AC, et al. (2009) Mice lacking brain-type creatine kinase activity show defective thermoregulation. Physiol Behav 97: 76–86.
- 29. Kuum M, Kaasik A, Joubert F, Ventura-Clapier R, Veksler V (2009) Energetic state is a strong regulator of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ loss in cardiac muscle: different efficiencies of different energy sources. Cardiovasc Res 83: 89–96.
- 30. An Y, Fan N, Zhang S (2009) Creatine kinase is a bacteriostatic factor with a lectin-like activity. Mol Immunol 46: 2666–2670.
- 31. Patra S, Ghosh A, Roy SS, Bera S, Das M, et al. (2012) A short review on creatine-creatine kinase system in relation to cancer and some experimental results on creatine as adjuvant in cancer therapy. Amino Acids 42: 2319–2330.
- 32. Pashintseva LP, Barlova MV, Bassalyk LS (1986) [Creatine kinase and its isoenzymes in breast tumor tissue]. Eksperimental'naia onkologiia 8: 51–54.
- 33. Wong SS, Wu AH, Fritsche HA (1987) Reassessment of creatine kinase BB as a marker for cancer of the prostate, breast, and lung. Clinical chemistry 33: 809–811.
- 34. Durany N, Joseph J, Jimenez OM, Climent F, Fernandez PL, et al. (2000) Phosphoglycerate mutase, 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate phosphatase, creatine kinase and enolase activity and isoenzymes in breast carcinoma. British journal of cancer 82: 20–27.
- 35. Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, Caligiuri MA, Zitvogel L, et al. (2011) Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science 331: 44–49.
- 36. DeNardo DG, Coussens LM (2007) Inflammation and breast cancer. Balancing immune response: crosstalk between adaptive and innate immune cells during breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res 9: 212.
- 37. Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Eskelinen M, Kosma VM, Marin S, et al. (1992) Lymphocyte infiltrates as a prognostic variable in female breast cancer. European journal of cancer 28A: 859–864.
- 38. Hubbard SR, Till JH (2000) Protein tyrosine kinase structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 69: 373–398.
- 39. Knowles JR (1980) Enzyme-catalyzed phosphoryl transfer reactions. Annu Rev Biochem 49: 877–919.
- 40. Wyss M, Kaddurah-Daouk R (2000) Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev 80: 1107–1213.
- 41. Ames A 3rd (2000) CNS energy metabolism as related to function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 34: 42–68.
- 42. Tachikawa M, Fukaya M, Terasaki T, Ohtsuki S, Watanabe M (2004) Distinct cellular expressions of creatine synthetic enzyme GAMT and creatine kinases uCK-Mi and CK-B suggest a novel neuron-glial relationship for brain energy homeostasis. Eur J Neurosci 20: 144–160.
- 43. Wong PY, Staren ED, Tereshkova N, Braun DP (1998) Functional analysis of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes in breast cancer patients. J Surg Res 76: 95–103.
- 44. Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Eskelinen M, Kosma VM, Marin S, et al. (1992) Lymphocyte infiltrates as a prognostic variable in female breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 28A: 859–864.
- 45. Peoples GE, Goedegebuure PS, Smith R, Linehan DC, Yoshino I, et al. (1995) Breast and ovarian cancer-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes recognize the same HER2/neu-derived peptide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 432–436.
- 46. Disis ML, Bernhard H, Shiota FM, Hand SL, Gralow JR, et al. (1996) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: an effective adjuvant for protein and peptide-based vaccines. Blood 88: 202–210.