The aim of this study was to determine the effect of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on fetal insulin resistance or β-cell function in Chinese pregnant women with GDM.
Maternal fasting blood and venous cord blood samples (reflecting fetal condition) were collected in 65 well-controlled Chinese GDM mothers (only given dietary intervention) and 83 control subjects. The insulin, glucose and proinsulin concentrations of both maternal and cord blood samples were measured, and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and the proinsulin-to-insulin ratios (an indicator of fetal β-cell function) were calculated in maternal and cord blood respectively.
Both maternal and fetal levels of insulin, proinsulin and HOMA-IR but not proinsulin-to-insulin ratios were significantly higher in the GDM group than in the control group (maternal insulin, 24.8 vs. 15.4 µU/mL, P = 0.004, proinsulin, 23.3 vs. 16.2 pmol/L, P = 0.005, and HOMA-IR, 5.5 vs. 3.5, P = 0.041, respectively; fetal: insulin, 15.1 vs. 7.9 µU/mL, P<0.001, proinsulin, 25.8 vs. 15.1 pmol/L, P = 0.015, and HOMA-IR, 2.8 vs. 1.4, P = 0.017, respectively). Fetal HOMA-IR but not proinsulin-to-insulin ratios was significantly correlated to maternal HOMA-IR (r = 0.307, P = 0.019), in the pregnant women with GDM.
Citation: Wang Q, Huang R, Yu B, Cao F, Wang H, Zhang M, et al. (2013) Higher Fetal Insulin Resistance in Chinese Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Correlation with Maternal Insulin Resistance. PLoS ONE 8(4): e59845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059845
Editor: Victor Sanchez-Margalet, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, School of Medicine, Spain
Received: December 6, 2012; Accepted: February 19, 2013; Published: April 1, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Wang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was supported by funding from the Changzhou Health Bureau (No. ZD201013) and Changzhou Women and Children Health Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University supported this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The rapid and significant increase in the incidence of metabolic syndrome and type II diabetes has become a worldwide concern in both developed and developing countries , . There are strong evidential supports for the “fetal origins” hypothesis, which connects adult metabolic syndrome to adverse intrauterine conditions and related disproportionate fetal growth –, especially in the type II diabetes –.
A great deal of research has revealed the pivotal role of insulin resistance and β-cell function in the development of type II diabetes in adults. Offspring of mothers with insulin resistance (e.g. GDM or obese mothers) are far more likely to develop metabolic syndrome and type II diabetes [9, 10, and 15]. However, only a few latest studies focused on the effect of GDM on fetal levels of insulin resistance or β-cell function in pregnant women with GDM. In 2009, it was firstly reported that fetuses of obese mothers (who had insulin resistance) developed insulin resistance in utero . Furthermore, in 2010, another study reported that oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) blood glucose concentrations were strongly negatively associated with decreased fetal insulin sensitivity in pregnant women with GDM . Similarly, our study was to determine the effect of GDM on fetal insulin resistance or β-cell function in Chinese pregnant women with GDM. Such related research may be help to find a potential effective intervention during pregnancy to halt the increasing epidemic of metabolic syndromes and type II diabetes.
Subjects and Methods
This study was approved by Changzhou Health Bureau and the ethics committee of Changzhou Women and Children Health Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University (No. ZD201013). The written informed consent was obtained from each subject in this manuscript.
This was a prospective maternal-fetal case-controlled cohort study. Pregnant women were recruited from Changzhou Women and Children Health Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from March 2010 to June 2011, as shown in figure 1.
GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PGDM, pregestational diabetes mellitus.
167 GDM and 3149 control subjects were included as candidates in this study, on the basis of a diagnosis of GDM at 24–28 weeks of gestation. 200 subjects were randomly invited in the control group. 62 GDM and 67 control subjects declined to participate this study, and 3 pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus was not invited in the GDM group. 102 GDM and 133 control subjects participated in this study. The pregnant women with GDM were well managed by dietary intervention and blood glucose monitoring for achieving euglycemia. Dietary intervention included low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets intake, as well as optimizing of dietary fatty acid composition. In the GDM group, 21 were excluded as 6 for additional insulin injection, and 15 for premature delivery. In the control group, 17 were excluded, as 7 for pre-eclampsia, 9 for premature delivery, and 1 for a multiple pregnancy. 16 GDM and 33 control subjects were excluded, as we missed collection of their maternal blood or cord blood specimens. 65 GDM and 83 control mother-infant pairs (total 75.1% of eligible participants) constituted our final study cohort, with complete data on all studied biomarkers in maternal and cord blood specimens. There were no significant differences in maternal characteristics between patients included versus those excluded in this study.
Diagnosis of GDM was established by a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24–28 weeks of gestation. GDM was diagnosed if the woman had two or more of the three plasma glucose values exceeding the following cutoffs: fasting, 5.3 mmol/L; 1 hour, 10.0 mmol/L; or 2 hour, 8.6 mmol/L (American Diabetes Association criteria) (18). There was no abnormal labor (e.g., prolonged labor or precipitate delivery) in every subject with or without GDM in this study. Every woman had been fasting since the beginning of the active phase in the first stage of labor. Exclusion criteria were: 1) a multiple pregnancy; 2) gestational age <37 weeks; 3) maternal age <18 or >45 years; 4) illicit drug use; 5) severe preexisting illnesses including pregestational diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, renal failure, pre-eclampsia, active or chronic liver diseases, epilepsy, serious pulmonary disease, serious hematological disorders, cancer, heart disease, or other life-threatening conditions; and 6) known fetal congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities.
Data and Blood Sample Collection
Maternal prepregnancy weight was obtained by face-to-face interview. Maternal weight close to delivery and height were measured in the hospital, and maternal body mass index (BMI) and weight gain were calculated. Neonatal birth weight and length were measured within one hour after delivery. Body mass index (BMI) and ponderal index (PI) were calculated: BMI = [weight (kilograms)/height (m)2], and PI = [birth weight (grams)/length (centimeters)3] ×100. Maternal fasting blood samples were collected about 1–3 days before delivery, at 37–41 weeks. Venous cord blood samples were obtained by syringe from the double-clamped venous cord immediately after delivery. Serum was separated by centrifugation and kept frozen in multiple aliquots at −80°C until analysis. Hemoglobin A1c levels were measured during the late pregnancy in the GDM group.
Metabolic Parameters Assays
Glucose levels were assessed using Hitachi 7180 automated analyzer (Wako Diagnostics, Japan). Hemoglobin A1c levels were estimated using VARIANT II automated analyser (Bio-Rad, laboratories, Inc.). Insulin levels were measured using the electrochemistry immunoassay (ECL) method, with a COBAS e601 automated analyser (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). Proinsulin levels were determined by ELISA (R&D Systems, America), with an intra-assay CV of 5.6% and an inter-assay CV of 8.3%. The insulin resistance indexes were calculated according to the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR): (fasting serum insulin [microunits per milliliter] × fasting glucose [millimoles per liter])/22.5 .
Results were expressed as means ± SEM. Log transformation was applied for variables with skewed data distribution (insulin, proinsulin, HOMA-IR, and proinsulin-to-insulin ratio) in all statistical analysis. Differences between groups were examined with the Student’s t-test, and adjusted for potential confounders (maternal age, prepregnancy weight, and prepregnancy BMI), using univariate ANOVA analysis. The correlation analysis was tested with Pearson’s correlation analysis, and adjusted for potential confounders (maternal age and prepregnancy BMI), using partial correlations. All statistical analysis were performed with the software package SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Maternal and Pregnancy Characteristics
Maternal and fetal characteristics of total 148 Chinese pregnant women with or without GDM were shown in Table 1. The fetal condition was reflected by cord blood metabolic parameters. The pregnant women with GDM were slightly older, and had a higher prepregnancy weight and BMI than the control subjects. Maternal height, weight gain and Caesarean section rate did not differ between the two groups. Hemoglobin A1c level of GDM mothers was 5.29±0.06%, and in the mormal interval ranges. Neonatal birth weight, length and ponderal index were higher in the GDM group than the control group, although neonates in two groups were born at the similar gestational weeks.
Differences in Metabolic Parameters between the GDM and Control Groups
Both maternal and fetal levels of insulin, proinsulin and HOMA-IR were significantly higher in the GDM groups than the control subjects. Those differences were still significant, after adjustment for potential confounders (maternal age, prepregnancy weight and prepregnancy BMI) (Table 2). There’re no significant differences in maternal or fetal levels of glucose and proinsulin-to-insulin ratios between the GDM and control groups (Table 2).
Correlations between Fetal HOMA-IR and Maternal Metabolic Parameters
In the GDM group, fetal HOMA-IR was significantly correlated with maternal insulin, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR and proinsulin-to-insulin ratios (Table 2). Fetal proinsulin-to-insulin ratios were not significantly correlated with maternal HOMA-IR. After adjustment for maternal age and prepregnancy BMI, fetal HOMA-IR was significantly correlating with maternal HOMA-IR or insulin (adjusted, r = 0.307, P = 0.019, and r = 0.261, P = 0.047, respectively) (Table 3). Similar correlations were observed in all the subjects with or without GDM (adjusted, r = 0.424, P = 0.008, and r = 0.415, P = 0.007, respectively). In the GDM group, neonatal ponderal index was significantly correlated with maternal or fetal HOMA-IR and insulin (Table 4). Those correlations remained significant after adjustment for maternal age and prepregnancy BMI (Table 4).
Several studies on GDM have reported on the metabolic abnormalities of GDM mothers. Quite a few focused on maternal-fetal metabolic mechanisms in pregnant women with GDM.
This study tried to determine the effect of GDM on fetal insulin resistance or β-cell function in Chinese pregnant women with GDM. Our study reported i) fetal insulin resistance but not proinsulin-to-insulin ratios was significantly higher in Chinese pregnant women with GDM than control subjects, ii) fetal insulin resistance was correlated with maternal insulin resistance,iii) neonatal ponderal index was correlated with maternal or fetal insulin and insulin resistance.
In this study, we reported significantly higher levels of insulin, proinsulin and HOMA-IR, in Chinese pregnant women with GDM than control subjects, within 1–3 days before delivery, after adjustment for potential confounders. Similarly, we also reported significantly higher levels of insulin, proinsulin and HOMA-IR, in fetuses of Chinese pregnant women with GDM than control subjects, after adjustment for potential confounders. Such data clearly show a more highly insulin-resistant condition in fetuses of Chinese pregnant women with GDM than control subjects. Similar with this study of Chinese pregnant women, higher levels of insulin, proinsulin and HOMA-IR in fetuses of pregnant women with GDM were also reported in other different races and countries [17, 20, and 21].
However, even though both fetal levels of insulin and proinsulin levels were higher in GDM group, there’re no significant differences in fetal proinsulin-to-insulin ratios between the GDM and control groups. Such data agree with related fetal studies , and show no observably impaired β-cell function, in fetuses of GDM mothers than control subjects.
Several studies have focused on the effect of fetal growth on insulin resistance in infants, children, adolescents or adults –. While only a few latest data is available about the effects of maternal metabolic parameters on fetal insulin resistance. It was reported that there’s a strong positive correlation (r = 0.35) between maternal insulin resistance of obese mothers and fetal insulin resistance . Similarly, it was reported that there’s a negative association between maternal OGTT blood glucose levels in mothers with GDM and fetal insulin sensitivity (r = −0.31) . In accord with such data, this study reported that maternal insulin resistance significantly correlated with fetal insulin resistance in Chinese pregnant women with GDM (r = 0.307). As maternal insulin can not cross the placenta, GDM may thus affect fetal metabolic condition (such as insulin resistance) by maternal-fetal metabolic and/or epigenetic mechanisms. For example, a latest study from Salomón C et al. reported GDM reduces adenosine transport in human placental microvascular endothelium, by an effect of insulin . Further research increasing that understanding may facilitate the development of potential effective interventions during GDM pregnancy, for breaking the mother-baby metabolic programming cycle.
As expected, neonatal ponderal index was significantly correlated with fetal levels of HOMA-IR and insulin in this study. We also reported significant correlations between neonatal ponderal index and maternal levels of HOMA-IR and insulin. In view of the associations of HOMA-IR or insulin levels between mothers and fetuses presented above, it was suggested that increased fetal insulin may play an important role in the GDM effect on increased neonatal fat mass.
The prevalence of GDM and macrosomia increased rapidly in Asia, especially in China. In view of Asian traditional custom of striving to ingest nutrition in gestation, this problem would become more and more seriously in future. It was suggested that glucose control may have attenuated the impact of GDM on fetal overgrowth in Chinese women in this study. Furthermore, our data presented higher fetal insulin resistance in Chinese pregnant women with GDM. As fetuses of a more highly insulin-resistant condition are more likely to develop metabolic syndromes and type II diabetes, this finding would be help to understand the mechanism in development and prevention of mother-baby diabetic cycle.
In summary, this study reported a higher fetal insulin resisitance in well-controlled Chinese pregnant women with GDM, which was correlated with maternal insulin resistance. Our findings demonstrate the effect of GDM on higher fetal insulin resistance, which may be help to present an opportunity for potential effective intervention during pregnancy on prevention of metabolic syndrome and type II diabetes.
Conceived and designed the experiments: ZZ QW RH BY FC. Performed the experiments: ZZ QW RH BY FC MZ HW XW BZ HZ. Analyzed the data: ZZ RH BY FC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HW XW BZ. Wrote the paper: ZZ QW RH BY FC.
- 1. Prasad H, Ryan DA, Celzo MF, Stapleton D (2012) Metabolic syndrome: definition and therapeutic implications. Postgrad Med 124: 21–30.
- 2. Eberle C, Merki E, Yamashita T, Johnson S, Armando AM, et al. (2012) Rising diabetes prevalence among urban-dwelling black South Africans. PLoS One 7: e45361.
- 3. Barker DJ, Hales CN, Fall CH, Osmond C, Phipps K, et al. (1993) Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia (syndrome X): relation to reduced fetal growth. Diabetologia 36: 62–67.
- 4. Hales CN, Barker DJ (1992) Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Diabetologia 35: 595–601.
- 5. Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Savage PJ, Bennett PH (1981) Diabetes incidence in Pima indians: contributions of obesity and parental diabetes. Am J Epidemiol 113: 144–156.
- 6. Dabelea D, Crume T (2011) Maternal environment and the transgenerational cycle of obesity and diabetes. Diabetes 60: 1849–1855.
- 7. Meas T (2010) Fetal origins of insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome: a key role for adipose tissue? Diabetes Metab 36: 11–20.
- 8. Symonds ME, Sebert SP, Hyatt MA, Budge H (2009) Nutritional programming of the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol 5: 604–610.
- 9. Dabelea D, Hanson RL, Lindsay RS, Pettitt DJ, Imperatore G, et al. (2000) Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: a study of discordant sibships. Diabetes 49: 2208–2211.
- 10. Krishnaveni GV, Veena SR, Hill JC, Kehoe S, Karat SC, et al. (2010) Intrauterine exposure to maternal diabetes is associated with higher adiposity and insulin resistance and clustering of cardiovascular risk markers in Indian children. Diabetes Care 33: 402–404.
- 11. Langer O, Yogev Y, Xenakis EM, Brustman L (2005) Overweight and obese in gestational diabetes: the impact on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192: 1768–1776.
- 12. Schaefer-Graf UM, Kjos SL, Kilavuz O, Plagemann A, Brauer M, et al. (2003) Determinants of fetal growth at different periods of pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care 26: 193–198.
- 13. Misra VK, Trudeau S, Perni U (2011) Maternal serum lipids during pregnancy and infant birth weight: the influence of prepregnancy BMI. Obesity 19: 1476–1481.
- 14. Schaefer-Graf UM, Graf K, Kulbacka I, Kjos SL, Dudenhausen J, et al. (2008) Maternal lipids as strong determinants of fetal environment and growth in pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 31: 1858–1863.
- 15. Dabelea D (2007) The predisposition to obesity and diabetes in offspring of diabetic mothers. Diabetes Care (Suppl. 1): S169–S174.
- 16. Catalano PM, Presley L, Minium J, Hauguel-de Mouzon S (2009) Fetuses of obese mothers develop insulin resistance in utero. Diabetes Care 32: 1076–1080.
- 17. Luo ZC, Delvin E, Fraser WD, Audibert F, Deal CI, et al. (2010) Maternal glucose tolerance in pregnancy affects fetal insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care 33: 2055–2061.
- 18. American Diabetes Association (2003) Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care (Suppl. 1): S103–S105.
- 19. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, et al. (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28: 412–419.
- 20. Ortega-Senovilla H, Schaefer-Graf U, Meitzner K, Abou-Dakn M, Graf K, et al. (2011) Gestational diabetes mellitus causes changes in the concentrations of adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein and other adipocytokines in cord blood. Diabetes Care 34: 2061–2066.
- 21. Schaefer-Graf UM, Meitzner K, Ortega-Senovilla H, Graf K, Vetter K, et al. (2011) Differences in the implications of maternal lipids on fetal metabolism and growth between gestational diabetes mellitus and control pregnancies. Diabet Med 28: 1053–1059.
- 22. Vielwerth SE, Jensen RB, Larsen T, Holst KK, Molgaard C, et al. (2008) The effect of birthweight upon insulin resistance and associated cardiovascular risk factors in adolescence is not explained by fetal growth velocity in the third trimester as measured by repeated ultrasound fetometry. Diabetologia 51: 1483–1492.
- 23. Fabricius-Bjerre S, Jensen RB, Faerch K, Larsen T, Molgaard C, et al. (2011) Impact of birth weight and early infant weight gain on insulin resistance and associated cardiovascular risk factors in adolescence. PLoS One 6: e20595.
- 24. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Hurtig-Wennlof A, Meirhaeghe A, Gonzalez-Gross M, et al. (2011) Physical activity attenuates the effect of low birth weight on insulin resistance in adolescents: findings from two observational studies. Diabetes 60: 2295–2299.
- 25. Salomón C, Westermeier F, Puebla C, Arroyo P, Guzmán-Gutiérrez E, et al. (2012) Gestational diabetes reduces adenosine transport in human placental microvascular endothelium, an effect reversed by insulin. PLoS One 7: e40578.