Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Cyanobactericidal Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on Microcystis auruginosa

  • Yun Kong,

    Affiliation Department of Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

  • Xiangyang Xu,

    Affiliations Department of Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, ZJU-UWA Joint Centre in Integrated Water Management and Protection, Hangzhou, China

  • Liang Zhu

    Affiliation Department of Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Cyanobactericidal Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on Microcystis auruginosa

  • Yun Kong, 
  • Xiangyang Xu, 
  • Liang Zhu


An isolated strain Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 was applied to inhibit the growth of cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa FACHB-905. The effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth on the cell integrity and physiological characteristics of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 was investigated using the flow cytometry (FCM), enzyme activity and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) methods. Results showed that the growth of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 was significantly inhibited, and the percentage of live cells depended on the culture broth concentration and exposure time. The activities of antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) increased with exposure concentration and exposure time, and the significant increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) led to the disruption of the subcellular structure of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905, and caused the increase of malondialdehyde (MDA). Furthermore, TEM observation suggested the presence of three stages (cell breakage, organelle release and cell death) for the cyanobactericidal process of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1. Therefore, Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 not only affected antioxidant enzyme activities and ROS level, but also destroyed the subcellular structure of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905, demonstrating excellent cyanobactericidal properties.


Up to now, the increasingly frequent outbreak of cyanobacterial blooms in lakes, reservoirs and rivers has drawn great attention in China [1]. Environmental and health problems caused by cyanobacterial blooms have been documented in many regions, and many eutrophication control methods such as chemical algaecides, oxidants, allelochemicals and cyanobactericidal microorganisms, have been applied for cyanobacteria and algae suppression [2], [3]. In the recent years, cyanobactericidal microbial technology has been regarded as a novel and safe method for eutrophic water remediation because of its environmentally friendly characteristics and efficiency.

Previous studies indicated that the inhibition of harmful algal or cyanobacterial growth might be the result of extracellular secretions from microorganisms [4], [5], [6]. These cyanobactericidal microorganisms including Bacillus, Dietzia, Janibacter, Micrococcus [5], Streptomyces sp. [4], [6], fungi [7], Pseudoalteromonas [8] and so on. The biodegradation mechanism of cyanobactericidal microorganism is speculated through direct or indirect attack [7], [8], such as the allelochemical inhibition on the growth of cyanobacteria [9], [10]. Several studies have shown that excess production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cyanobacteria occurs under environmental stresses, and the growth of cyanobacteria is inhibited [9], [11], [12], [13]. It was reported that exposure to atrazine increased the level of the malondialdehyde level (MDA) in Chlorella vulgaris, and the antioxidant enzyme activities including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) were also increased markedly in the presence of atrazine [14]. At the same time, the oxidative damage described as lipid peroxidation might be one of the causes for the allelopathic effect of allelochemical gramine and pyrogallic acid on M. aeruginosa [9], [15]. However, it is difficult to distinguish different statuses of cyanobacterial cells by traditional methods such as cyanobacterial cell number or Chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentration under limited conditions, and no cyanobactericidal microorganism has been reported to induce antioxidant enzyme systems. Therefore, research on the enzymatic response of bloom cyanobacteria by cyanobactericidal microorganisms may be helpful to explain the cyanobactericidal mechanism and promote the application of cyanobactericidal microbial technology.

A bacterial strain named HJC-D1was isolated from an eutrophic pond in Hangzhou, China, and exhibited remarkable cyanobactericidal activity against Microcystis aeruginosa. It was identified as Streptomyces sp. by morphology and by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. In this study, the effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth on the cell integrity and physiological characteristics of M.aeruginosa, including the enzyme activities of SOD, CAT and POD, oxidative damage indicator of MDA and cellular redox status of ROS, were investigated through exposure tests using flow cytometry (FCM), enzyme activity and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) technologies.

Materials and Methods

Cyanobactericidal Bacterium and Cyanobacterium Culturing

The strain Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 with excellent cyanobactericidal activity characteristic used in this study was isolated from an eutrophication pond in Hangzhou, China. The culture of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 was maintained at 4°C in a Gause′s synthetic agar medium [16], and culture broth was prepared by incubating the seed culture at 28°C with a shaking speed of 150 rpm for 72 h. The Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 fermentation broth was treated as follows before use: The mixture was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min, and then filtered through a 0.22 µm cellulose acetate membrane to acquire a cell-free filtrate. The cell-free filtrate was subsequently inoculated into M. aeruginosa culture for cyanobactericidal activity tests.

Microcystis aeruginosa FACHB-905 was purchased from the Freshwater Algae Culture Collection of Institute of Hydrobiology (FACHB), Chinese Academy of Sciences (Wuhan, China). Before used as an inoculant, it was cultured for 7 d to reach the log phase under the following conditions: sterilized BG11 medium [17]; 2000 lux white light, light: dark = 14 h: 10 h; 25±1°C.

Cyanobactericidal Activity Test of Isolated Bacterium on M. aeruginosa FACHB-905

The cyanobactericidal effects were studied by adding dilutions of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth (0, 1%, 3%, 5% and 10%, v/v) to a 500 mL sterilized conical beaker with 225 mL BG11 medium containing M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cells at a Chl a concentration of 302.7±75.4 µg L−1, brought to a final volume of 250 mL by addition of Gause’s synthetic medium [16]. A negative control was made by adding 25 mL Gause′s medium into 225 mL cyanobacterial solution. All the samples and controls were incubated under the pre-set conditions described in Section “Cyanobactericidal bacterium and cyanobacterium culturing”. Each treatment was replicated three times and the arithmetical means (± SD) were obtained. Five mL of sample was filtered through the GF/F filter and then the chlorophyll was extracted using 10 mL of acetone (90%). The optical density of extracts were determined at 630, 645, 663 and 750 nm using a UV-2401 PC spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) with a 1 cm cell. The Chl a concentration of the M. aeruginosa culture was determined using the equations derived by reference [18].

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cyanobacterial Cells

Flow cytometric (FCM) analysis was employed for determining cell integrity of the tested cyanobacteria M. aeruginosa. The detailed procedures were described by Daly et al. [19], Chang et al. [20] and Prado et al. [21]. An FCM (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) equipped with an argon-ion excitation laser (488 nm) and forward (FS) and side (SS) light scatter detectors was employed. A standard green fluorescence detector (FL1, 530 nm) was used to detect cells stained with SYTOX green nucleic acid stain (Invitrogen, USA) and fluorescein diacetate (FDA) (Invitrogen, USA), and a red fluorescence detector (FL4, 650 nm) was used to detect the auto-fluorescence from chlorophyll in the cells. The flow rate of cyanobacterial cells was controlled at 200 cells s−1 for each cytometric parameter investigated, and data were collected until the combined number of events recorded in the intact and ruptured regions reached 5000 or the analysis time reached 5 min. Data were collected using listmode files and statistically analysed using the EXPO32 ADC software (Beckman Coulter Inc.).

Antioxidant Enzyme Activities Extraction and Analysis

Twenty-five millilitres of each culture was collected to extract enzymes following the method in Qian et al. [22]. Lipid peroxidation level was measured by MDA level according to Dogru et al. [23], while the measurement of SOD activity followed that of Trenzado et al. [24]. CAT and POD activity was measured according to Qian et al. [25]. The activity of each enzyme was expressed on a protein basis. The ROS level was determined by analyzing the fluorescence intensity of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) [22].

Protein and Carbohydrate Analyses

Proteins were detected by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method, and carbohydrates were detected by the phenolesulphuric acid method [26].

Transmission Electron Microscopy

Cyanobacterial samples were harvested by centrifugation at 10000×g for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded, and then cyanobacterial cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS) for 24 h at 4°C. After fixation, the samples were post-fixed in 1% buffered osmium tetroxide for 2 h, dehydrated using a graded ethanol and embedded in Epon-812. Ultrathin sections were stained in 2% uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined with a Hitachi H-600 transmission electron microscope [13], [27].

Statistical Analysis

The results were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using Version 17.0 of SPSS for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). All data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the least significant difference test to evaluate cyanobacterial oxidative damage and antioxidant responses of the cyanobacterium. When the probability (p) was less than 0.05 or 0.01, the values were considered significantly different.


Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on the Growth of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905

Flow cytometry was used to distinguish living cells from chlorotic cells resulting from exposure to different concentrations of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth. Fig. 1 shows the effect of Streptomyces sp. on the cell integrity of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 after 8 d incubation. Before the addition of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1, all the cells are integral. The growth of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cells were effectively inhibited by the culture broth with a concentration range of 3%–10% (v/v) after 4 d exposure. The growth of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 was significantly inhibited and the percentage of live cells decreased with greater culture broth concentration and time of exposure, which were 51.4%, 15.7% and 2.3% for the 3%, 5% and 10% treatment group after 8 d exposure, respectively (shown in Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Cell viability for M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 with and without exposure to Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth.

Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on Cyanobacterial Protein and Carbohydrate Contents

The effects of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on the protein and carbohydrate contents appear in Fig. 2. The protein contents of the cyanobacterial cells in the treatment groups that were exposed to culture broth (1%, 3%, 5% and 10%, v/v) were 35.90±1.53, 28.37±2.94, 22.87±1.62 and 15.38±1.84 mg L−1, which was 47.3%, 37.4%, 30.1% and 20.3% of the control group (75.90±2.55 mg L−1), respectively. For the 8 d incubation, protein content experienced almost no change compared to that of the 4 d incubation (Fig. 2a).

Figure 2. Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth on cyanobacterial protein and carbohydrate contents.

(a) protein contents; (b) carbohydrate contents. * represents a statistically significant difference of p<0.05 when compared to the control, ** represents a statistically significant difference of p<0.01.

On the contrary, an obvious increase in carbohydrate contents was observed after M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cell exposure to Streptomyces sp., although the increase was not obvious after 4 d incubation (Fig. 2b), and the carbohydrate content of cyanobacterial cells on day 8 was 76.12±16.49 mg L−1 for the control group and 86.80±23.65, 394.63±54.29, 655.60±53.16 and 1206.6±122.70 mg L−1 for the treatment groups, respectively.

Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on Cyanobacterial MDA, SOD, POD, CAT Activities

Figure 3a shows that Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 induced a significant increase in MDA contents in M. aeruginosa FACHB-905. Compared with the control group, the MDA content was 0.048±0.013, 0.057±0.015, 0.082±0.008 and 0.103±0.005 µg L−1 after 4 d co-culturing (0.048±0.004 µg L−1 for the control) and 0.068±0.015, 0.082±0.012, 0.191±0.060 and 0.272±0.018 µg L−1 after 8 d incubation (0.052±0.007 µg L−1 for the control) for the treatment groups (1%, 3%, 5% and 10%), respectively. The ratio of MDA of the treatment versus the control group increased from 1.00 (1%), 1.19 (3%), 1.71 (5%) and 2.15 (10%) to 1.31, 1.58, 3.67 and 5.23, respectively.

Figure 3. Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth on MDA content and SOD, POD and CAT activities.

(a) MDA contents; (b) SOD activities; (c) POD activities; (d) CAT activities. * represents a statistically significant difference of p<0.05 when compared to the control, ** represents a statistically significant difference of p<0.01.

Cellular enzymatic activities including SOD, POD, and CAT were determined to investigate the cellular defense response induced by Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 stress. As shown in Fig. 3b, SOD activity showed a significant increase with the increase in culture broth concentration. The activity values were 1.13, 1.19, 1.22 and 1.31 times (p<0.05) greater than the control when cyanobacterial cells were treated with Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 of 1%, 3%, 5% and 10% after 4 d respectively. As exposure time increased, the SOD activity for the 10% treatment group was enhanced from 97.3±4.8 U mg−1 protein on day 4 to 132.4±7.1 U mg−1 protein on day 8 versus the control group with the maximum increase of 140.6% in response to Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1. It showed that the effect of both POD and CAT activities were similar to that of the SOD activity: the activities increased with higher culture broth concentration. After exposure to 1%–10% of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 for 4 d and 8 d, POD activity increased from 1.45 to 2.18 times and 1.61 to 2.85 times (Fig. 3c), while the CAT activity increased from 1.11 to 1.62 times and 1.08 to 1.39 times, respectively (Fig. 3d). Prolonged exposure time had an obvious influence on the CAT activity, however, the variation tendency for CAT activity was not obvious compared to POD activity.

Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on ROS Level

To investigate whether the cells of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 were in oxidative stress, the growth of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 inhibited by Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 was examined in terms of the ROS level. Weak fluorescence of DCF was present in the control group (Fig. 4a), and fluorescence intensity was significantly increased after exposure of fresh cyanobacterium to Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 after 8 d (Fig. 4b, c, d and e). The increase in ROS level was positively correlated with Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 concentration.

Figure 4. The effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on the formation of intracellular ROS in M. aeruginosa FACHB-905.

The intracellular ROS were detected with laser confocal microscope after DCFH-DA treatment. (a) The control of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905; (b), (c), (d) and (e) was the treatment of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 with different concentration of 1%, 3%, 5% and 10% (v/v), respectively.

Effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on Subcellular Structure

TEM analysis was used for evaluating the effect of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on the surface morphology of the cyanobacterial M. aeruginosa FACHB-905. The ultrastructure of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 was compared between control cells and those exposed to Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth (5%, v/v) for 4 d (shown in Fig. 5a), and results showed that the entire surface of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cell was enclosed by cell wall. The cell membrane was close to the cell wall, and the photosynthetic lamellae was in uniformity. However, the surface of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cells changed distinctly after the exposure to Streptomyces sp. (shown in Fig. 5b–d). Compared to the control cell, the cell membrane of M. aeruginosa was detached from the cell wall (shown in Fig. 5b), and the photosynthetic lamellae became nonuniform. Soon afterwards, the cell wall of M. aeruginosa began to break down and organelles such as polyphosphates bodies, cyanophycin granules, ribosomes and thylakoids were released from the cell (shown in Fig. 5c). As one of the most important organelles, the photosynthetic lamellae structure was also disrupted with the alteration and impairment of the thylakoids. Finally, the cellular structure entirely disappeared, and the cell membrane of M. aeruginosa was degraded completely while much of the contents leaked out (shown in Fig. 5d).

Figure 5. Biological degradation process of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 by Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1: (a) normal cell; (b) cell walls becoming detached; (c) release of cellular contents; (d) broken cell.

CW, cell wall; CM, cell membrane; PB, polyphosphates bodies; CG, cyanophycin granules; RIB, ribosomes.


As a rapid and sensitive technique to distinguish different statuses of cyanobacterial cells, FCM can measure cell number and various physiological characteristics of individual cells by using appropriate fluorescent probes. FCM has been used to distinguish subpopulations of cells exposed to tibetan hulless barley or herbicide [19], [20], [21], [28], [29]. In the present study, the analysis by means of flow cytometry showed that the different concentration of culture broth in the culture medium inhibited the growth of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905, and cyanobacterium cultures with culture broth concentrations of greater than or equal to 5% (v/v) showed a good inhibition performance compared to the control group. Similar to our results, Hua et al. [4] found that Streptomyces strain NT0401 caused a significant reduction in live M. aeruginosa cells at 5% (v/v) treatment level. The cyanobactericidal activity of microorganisms towards many kinds of cyanobacteria have also been published in other recent studies [5], [7], [30], and the effective removal efficiencies of Chl a were reported as approximately 50%–98% at a suitable bacterial density for more than 6 d [30], [31]. However, cell viability was restored after treatment for a period of time [10].

In spite of a heightened interest into the physiology and metabolism of cyanobactericidal bacteria and the improved availability of genome data, knowledge on the underlying molecular mechanisms, i.e., in respect to variations in antioxidant enzyme activities, remains rather limited. Hong et al. [32] have pointed out that membrane lipid peroxidation was a vital sign of cellular damage, and most antioxidant enzyme activities increased under stress conditions. Cell membranes made of unsaturated phospholipids often experienced membrane lipid peroxidation in adverse situations, and were vulnerable to oxygen attack resulting in MDA accumulation [14], [27], [32]. In the present study, Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 could improve the MDA levels, and MDA content increased with increasing culture broth (Fig. 3a), indicating that Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 induced membrane lipid peroxidation and caused damage to cell membranes; this phenomenon was also found by Hong et al. [9], [33] and Qian et al. [14], [34]. It was obvious that the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD and CAT also indicated a significant increase in exposure to Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 (Fig. 3b, c and d). Previous research suggested that the consistent increase in SOD, CAT, and POD activities in algae meant these antioxidant enzyme activities might be an important site of action of atrazine or glufosinate on C. vulgaris [14], [34]; the same variation in antioxidant enzyme activities was also found when the cyanobacteria or algae were exposed to allelochemicals [15], [27], [33].

It is well known that the superoxide anion radical, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals that belong to ROS are produced during membrane-linked electron transfer localized in mitochondria, chloroplasts and peroxisomes [10], [12], [35]. In addition, the oxidative damage was caused either directly or indirectly by triggering an increased level of ROS [12], and one of the responses of cyanobacteria and green algae to cyanobactericidal stress is the excess production of ROS [11]. Therefore, the acute increase in ROS level in the study showed that the M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cells were in serious oxidative stress (Fig. 4). Futhermore, the increased ROS levels resulted in oxidative damage on membrane lipids, nucleic acids and protein (Fig. 4). This phenomenon has been observed in other interactions between cyanobacteria and allelochemicals. A previous study reported that the ROS level of the cyanobacterium M. aeruginosa after treatment rose remarkably to 1.91 times that of the controls at high ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) concentration of 4 mg L−1 for 2 h, with an increase in the ROS level occurring after 24 h [32]. It could be found that the gramine caused an obvious increase in the ROS level of M. aeruginosa cells [9]. The results were consistent with the previous studies [32] in the sense that both an increased permeability of membranes as well as the damage to the cellular membrane structure were present.

The growth of cyanobacterial, algal, and diatomic cells is generally associated with the production of Chl a, protein and carbohydrate [36] and levels of cellular protein and carbohydrate are two basic indicators to reflect the physiological state of algae cells [10], [21]. The increase of cellular protein content for the control group in the experiment indicated that new protein was synthesized; however, with extended Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 treatment time, the contents of protein for the treatment groups began to decrease (Fig. 2a). This finding implied that the cells were not adapted to the external environmental stress, and the result was similar to the use of allelochemicals such as EMA [10]. However, the changes to carbohydrate contents were different from that of protein. The carbohydrate contents increased significantly with increasing culture broth concentrations (Fig. 2b), and the major reason for the biodegradation of cyanobacterium cells was Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1, which was consistent with the results in section 3.5. It was also found that carbohydrate contents increased significantly when M. aeruginosa was exposed to EMA for 3 d [10], thus supporting observations in the current study.

Generally, the cyanobacterial organic matter is comprised of proteins, neutral and charged polysaccharides, nucleic acids, lipids and small molecules, of which polysaccharides can comprise up to 80–90% of the total release [37]. It showed that cyanobacteria had more protein contents (41–69%) than diatoms (12–50%), while diatoms appeared to accumulate more lipids in the cells (5–43%) than cyanobacteria and green algae (2–30%) [38]. Henderson et al. [36] described that the ratio of protein to carbohydrate was 0.6 mg mg−1 at the stationary phase and 0.31 mg mg−1 at the exponential phase for M. aeruginosa, demonstrating that the amount of protein relative to carbohydrate decreased over time. Ultrastructural examination by TEM demonstrated that damage to M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 occurred. This result indicated that the cellular structure disappeared and caused the photosynthetic complex to disaggregate. The variation of the protein and carbohydrate contents implied that some organics were produced by the chlorotic M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cells, and the increases of antioxidant enzyme activities and ROS implied that the destruction of the cell structure might be the imbalance of oxidative stress on antioxidant defense system in M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 caused by Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 culture broth, which could be an indicator of the disintegration of the M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cells, and thus in accordance with results obtained by flow cytometry and TEM.


An isolated strain named Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 was used to inhibit the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa: its culture broth showed remarkable cyanobactericidal activity. The analytical method of flow cytometry was adopted to assess the physiological status of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 cells during the cyanobacterial inhibiting process, and results showed that the density of live cells decreased markedly after exposure to the cyanobactericidal culture broth. TEM analysis showed that there were three stages (cell breakage, organelle release, and cell death) for the cyanobactericidal process of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1, and the increase of SOD, POD and CAT activities and ROS level indicated that oxidant damage and the membrane integrity might be the cyanobactericidal mechanism of Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 on M. aeruginosa FACHB-905. In view of these results, it’s concluded that Streptomyces sp. HJC-D1 not only affects antioxidant enzyme activities and ROS level, but also destroys the subcellular structure of M. aeruginosa FACHB-905, thus exhibiting excellent cyanobactericidal activity.


We thank Dr. Ashton Myles Shortridge (Department of Geography, Michigan State University, USA) for the help of English checking.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YK XX. Performed the experiments: YK XX. Analyzed the data: YK XX LZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XX LZ. Wrote the paper: YK XX LZ.


  1. 1. Qu JH, Fan MH (2010) The Current State of Water Quality and Technology Development for Water Pollution Control in China. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 40: 519–560.
  2. 2. Qin BQ, Yang LY, Chen FZ, Zhu GW, Zhang L, et al. (2006) Mechanism and control of lake eutrophication. Chin Sci Bull 51: 2401–2412.
  3. 3. Tang XQ, Wu M, Yang WJ, Yin W, Jin F, et al. (2012) Ecological Strategy for Eutrophication Control. Water Air Soil Pollut 223: 723–737.
  4. 4. Hua XH, Li JH, Li JJ, Zhang LH, Cui Y (2009) Selective inhibition of the cyanobacterium, Microcystis, by a Streptomyces sp. Biotechnol Lett 31: 1531–1535.
  5. 5. Kim MJ, Jeong SY, Lee SJ (2008) Isolation, identification, and algicidal activity of marine bacteria against Cochlodinium polykrikoides. J Appl Phycol 20: 1069–1078.
  6. 6. Choi HJ, Kim BH, Kim JD, Han MS (2005) Streptomyces neyagawaensis as a control for the hazardous biomass of Microcystis aeruginosa (Cyanobacteria) in eutrophic freshwaters. Biol Control 33: 335–343.
  7. 7. Jia Y, Han GM, Wang CY, Guo P, Jiang WX, et al. (2010) The efficacy and mechanisms of fungal suppression of freshwater harmful algal bloom species. J Hazard Mater 183: 176–181.
  8. 8. Lovejoy C, Bowman JP, Hallegraeff GM (1998) Algicidal effects of a novel marine Pseudoalteromonas isolate (class Proteobacteria, gamma subdivision) on harmful algal bloom species of the genera Chattonella, Gymnodinium, and Heterosigma. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 2806–2813.
  9. 9. Hong Y, Hu HY, Xie X, Sakoda A, Sagehashi M, et al. (2009) Gramine-induced growth inhibition, oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat Toxicol 91: 262–269.
  10. 10. Yang C-Y, Liu S-J, Zhou S-W, Wu H-F, Yu J-B, et al. (2011) Allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) induces oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Pest Biochem Physiol 100: 93–103.
  11. 11. Wang J, Zhu JY, Liu SP, Liu BY, Gao YN, et al. (2011) Generation of reactive oxygen species in cyanobacteria and green algae induced by allelochemicals of submerged macrophytes. Chemosphere 85: 977–982.
  12. 12. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 373–399.
  13. 13. Shao JH, Xu Y, Wang ZJ, Jiang YG, Yu GL, et al. (2011) Elucidating the toxicity targets of beta-ionone on photosynthetic system of Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843 (Cyanobacteria). Aquat Toxicol 104: 48–55.
  14. 14. Qian HF, Sheng GD, Liu WP, Lu YC, Liu ZG, et al. (2008) Inhibitory effects of atrazine on Chlorella vulgaris as assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 182–187.
  15. 15. Shao JH, Wu ZX, Yu GL, Peng X, Li RH (2009) Allelopathic mechanism of pyrogallol to Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806 (Cyanobacteria): From views of gene expression and antioxidant system. Chemosphere 75: 924–928.
  16. 16. Huang HL, Zeng GM, Tang L, Yu HY, Xi XM, et al. (2008) Effect of biodelignification of rice straw on humification and humus quality by Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Streptomyces badius. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 61: 331–336.
  17. 17. Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stanier RY (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 111: 1–61.
  18. 18. APHA (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association (APHA).
  19. 19. Daly RI, Ho L, Brookes JD (2007) Effect of chlorination on Microcystis aeruginosa cell integrity and subsequent microcystin release and degradation. Environ Sci Technol 41: 4447–4453.
  20. 20. Chang DW, Hsieh ML, Chen YM, Lin TF, Chang JS (2011) Kinetics of cell lysis for Microcystis aeruginosa and Nitzschia palea in the exposure to beta-cyclocitral. J Hazard Mater 185: 1214–1220.
  21. 21. Prado R, Rioboo C, Herrero C, Suarez-Bregua P, Cid A (2012) Flow cytometric analysis to evaluate physiological alterations in herbicide-exposed Chlamydomonas moewusii cells. Ecotoxicology 21: 409–420.
  22. 22. Qian H, Li J, Pan X, Sun Z, Ye C, et al. (2012) Effects of streptomycin on growth of algae Chlorella vulgaris and Microcystis aeruginosa. Environ Toxicol 27: 229–237.
  23. 23. Dogru MK, Dogru AK, Gul M, Esrefoglu M, Yurekli M, et al. (2008) The effect of adrenomedullin on rats exposed to lead. J Appl Toxicol 28: 140–146.
  24. 24. Trenzado C, Hidalgo MC, Garcia-Gallego M, Morales AE, Furne M, et al. (2006) Antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in sturgeon Acipenser naccarii and trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. A comparative study. Aquaculture 254: 758–767.
  25. 25. Qian HF, Chen W, Sun LW, Jin YX, Liu WP, et al. (2009) Inhibitory effects of paraquat on photosynthesis and the response to oxidative stress in Chlorella vulgaris. Ecotoxicology 18: 537–543.
  26. 26. Liu ZQ, Cui FY, Ma H, Fan ZQ, Zhao ZW (2011) The role of nitrobenzene on the yield of trihalomethane formation potential in aqueous solutions with Microcystis aeruginosa. Water Res 45: 6489–6495.
  27. 27. Qian HF, Xu XY, Chen W, Jiang H, Jin YX, et al. (2009) Allelochemical stress causes oxidative damage and inhibition of photosynthesis in Chlorella vulgaris. Chemosphere 75: 368–375.
  28. 28. Rioboo C, O’Connor JE, Prado R, Herrero C, Cid A (2009) Cell proliferation alterations in Chlorella cells under stress conditions. Aquat Toxicol 94: 229–237.
  29. 29. Xiao X, Chen Y-x, Liang X-q, Lou L-p, Tang X-j (2010) Effects of Tibetan hulless barley on bloom-forming cyanobacterium (Microcystis aeruginosa) measured by different physiological and morphologic parameters. Chemosphere 81: 1118–1123.
  30. 30. Shi SY, Liu YD, Shen YW, Li GB, Li DH (2006) Lysis of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (Cyanobacterium) by a bacterium Bacillus cereus. Biol Control 39: 345–351.
  31. 31. Zhang H, Yu Z, Huang Q, Xiao X, Wang X, et al. (2011) Isolation, identification and characterization of phytoplankton-lytic bacterium CH-22 against Microcystis aeruginosa. Limnologica 41: 70–77.
  32. 32. Hong Y, Hu HY, Li FM (2008) Physiological and biochemical effects of allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) on cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 71: 527–534.
  33. 33. Hong Y, Hu HY, Xie X, Li FM (2008) Responses of enzymatic antioxidants and non-enzymatic antioxidants in the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa to the allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) isolated from reed (Phragmites communis). J Plant Physiol 165: 1264–1273.
  34. 34. Qian HF, Chen W, Sheng GD, Xu XY, Liu WP, et al. (2008) Effects of glufosinate on antioxidant enzymes, subcellular structure, and gene expression in the unicellular green alga Chlorella vulgaris. Aquat Toxicol 88: 301–307.
  35. 35. Bonekamp NA, Volkl A, Fahimi HD, Schrader M (2009) Reactive oxygen species and peroxisomes: Struggling for balance. Biofactors 35: 346–355.
  36. 36. Henderson RK, Baker A, Parsons SA, Jefferson B (2008) Characterisation of algogenic organic matter extracted from cyanobacteria, green algae and diatoms. Water Res 42: 3435–3445.
  37. 37. Myklestad SM (1995) Release of extracellular products by phytoplankton with special emphasis on polysaccharides. Sci Total Environ 165: 155–164.
  38. 38. Hong HC, Wong MH, Liang Y (2009) Amino Acids as Precursors of Trihalomethane and Haloacetic Acid Formation During Chlorination. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56: 638–645.