Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Long Distance Bicycle Riding Causes Prostate-Specific Antigen to Increase in Men Aged 50 Years and Over



To investigate whether bicycle riding alters total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) serum concentrations in healthy older men.


129 male participants, ranging in age from 50 to 71 years (mean 55 years), rode in a recreational group bicycle ride of between 55 and 160 kilometers. Blood samples for tPSA analysis were drawn within 60 minutes before starting, and within 5 minutes after completing the ride. The pre-cycling and post-cycling tPSA values were log transformed for normality and compared using paired t-tests. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between changes in tPSA with age and distance cycled.


Bicycle riding caused tPSA to increase by an average of 9.5% (95% CI = 6.1–12.9; p<0.001) or 0.23 ng/ml. The number of participants with an elevated tPSA (using the standard PSA normal range cut-off of 4.0 ng/ml) increased from two pre-cycle to six post-cycle (or from five to eight when using age-based normal ranges). Univariate linear regression analysis revealed that the change in tPSA was positively correlated with age and the distance cycled.


Cycling causes an average 9.5% increase in tPSA, in healthy male cyclists ≥50 years old, when measured within 5 minutes post cycling. We considered the increase clinically significant as the number of participants with an elevated PSA, according to established cut-offs, increased post-ride. Based on the research published to date, the authors suggest a 24–48 hour period of abstinence from cycling and ejaculation before a PSA test, to avoid spurious results.


Bicycle riding is a common recreational activity, particularly in the older age group for whom joint disease, such as osteoarthritis, often requires a departure from higher impact activities. In Australia, cycling is the fourth most popular sporting activity for males by participant numbers, and eight percent of the male population cycle for physical recreation [1].

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) is a glycoprotein secreted by epithelial cells of the normal prostate gland. PSA functions to liquefy the seminal gel at ejaculation [2]. The serum PSA test and digital rectal examination (DRE) are a widely utilised combination of tests used to screen for prostate cancer, although prostate cancer screening guidelines vary widely between countries and different medical organisations. In Australia, screening is usually recommended from the age of 50 years [3]. The PSA test can detect prostate cancer at a point where curative treatment can be offered, but has been noted to have limitations in sensitivity and selectivity in that: the probability of cancer occurring given an elevated PSA is one in three, and prostate cancer can still be present with a normal PSA [4]. Nevertheless, the PSA test remains the most effective screening tool currently available, particularly when it is combined with a DRE.

PSA is produced by both benign and malignant prostate cells, and PSA levels are known to increase in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis and cancer [5]. A variety of surgical and non-surgical procedures and activities have been shown to influence PSA. PSA can be transiently elevated by radical prostatectomy (Stamey), transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy [6], [7], and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) [6][9]. These procedures increase PSA by far greater than 100%, and the PSA can remain elevated for days to weeks. The influence on PSA by these surgical manipulations is probably best summarized by research measuring PSA after radical prostatectomy [8]. There is a large initial increase in PSA after surgery; followed by a decrease in PSA (half life estimated as 2.2+/−0.8 days), and for most patients a period of 14–16 days may be required to allow a fall to normal levels [8], but can occasionally remain elevated for several weeks, particularly when prostate cancer is present.

Non-invasive manipulations, such as ejaculation [10], [11], digital rectal examination (DRE) [12][14], and cystoscopy [6], [8], [15] also increase PSA but to a lesser degree, and for shorter periods of time, than surgical manipulations.

Although there is no evidence that general exercise (ie. non-cycling) increases PSA in men with a normal baseline PSA [16], [17], research specifically concentrating on cycling has, however, found evidence that PSA is altered, albeit with conflicting results.

A comprehensive analysis of the 12 previous research reports regarding PSA and cycling, the majority of studies have shown no change to PSA subsequent to cycling [16][22], however, three prospective studies [22][24] and 2 published case reports [25], [26] have shown an increase in PSA with cycling. The methodologies of these cycling studies varied in many ways from each other, including the age ranges tested, timing of the post-cycling PSA testing, sample size, and the duration and intensity of cycling, and therefore discourage effective comparison. These differences are summarized in Table 1. This lack of consistency prevents definitive conclusions from being drawn in relation to the impact of cycling on PSA.

Table 1. Summary of methodology and results of previous studies analyzing the effect of cycling on PSA.

Subsequent to the analysis of previous studies examining the influence of cycling and other prostatic manipulations on PSA, we assessed the effect of cycling by using methods designed to control for the confounding factors that we believed may have led to the findings that cycling did not influence PSA. We aimed to assess whether cycling increased PSA in a large sample of men (n = 129) at an age where prostate screening is commonly conducted (≥50 years), while being representative of typical distances cycled for recreation and fitness (≥55 km), and ensuring that the time elapsed before post-cycling PSA testing was minimized, to eliminate the chance of serum clearance.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Australian Institute of Sport in writing on 6th September 2007 (approval number 20070813).

The participants consisted of 129 male cyclists who were invited to take part in the current study as an adjunct to their independent participation in organized and supported recreational group bicycle rides on formed roads. The specified age criteria for selection within the study was 50 years and above. The average age of participants was 55.5 years, with a range of 50–71 years. Potential participants were required to complete a short questionnaire prior to the commencement of the event and based on their responses were either included in or excluded from the study.

Participants were excluded from the study if they had a known history of prostate cancer, benign prostatic hypertrophy, prostatitis, urinary retention, or a history of a prostate operation of any kind. Participants were also excluded if they were on finasteride or other anti-androgen medications, or if they had undertaken a prostate biopsy within the previous 3 months. Participants were not excluded if they had recorded a high PSA during previous routine testing. Participants were advised to abstain from riding on the day of the ride until their pre-cycling blood test was taken.

Sampling took place over five separate recreational one-day cycling events held in Victoria, Australia during 2009 and 2010. The average distance cycled by each participant was 102 km, with a range of 55 km–160 km, with short breaks permitted during the course of the ride. Participants had their pre-ride tPSA taken within 60 minutes before starting the ride, and the post-ride tPSA sample was taken within five minutes of completing the ride. No separate control group was sampled as PSA does not show diurnal variation in patients with or without prostate cancer [27], [28].

Total PSA was measured using a standard test (Centaur analyser, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown USA), with an inter-assay coefficient of variation of 5.0%, with all samples analysed at the same central laboratory. An elevation in tPSA was assessed against both the standard PSA normal range cut-off of 4.0 ng/ml, and age-based normal ranges (Table 2), separately. Participants with abnormal results were invited to follow up with their choice of doctor or urologist, or with the urologist involved with the study. Where follow-up information was available it has been commented on in the study. The progress of these participants was followed by the authors via the participants directly and/or their doctors until June 2012, a period ranging from 1 year and 9 months, to 2 years and 8 months post ride.

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 20 for Windows (Chicago, IL, USA). Baseline and follow-up tPSA results were log transformed prior to analysis due to non-normality. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre- versus post-cycling tPSA values. Percentage changes in log transformed serum tPSA represent the absolute differences from baseline multiplied by 100. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between changes in tPSA with age and distance cycled. All data are presented as means with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise stated. In all instances a p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Prior to the ride, the median tPSA value for the study cohort was 0.91 ng/ml, range 0.2 to 13.3 ng/ml. Using the standard PSA normal range cut-off of 4.0 ng/ml, two participants (1.5%) had an elevated tPSA concentration pre-ride. Using age based normal ranges (Table 2), five participants (3.9%) had an elevated tPSA concentration pre-ride.

After the ride, tPSA values increased significantly, by an average of 9.5% (95% CI = 6.1–12.9, p<0.001) or 0.23 ng/ml. Using the standard PSA normal range cut-off of 4.0 ng/ml, six participants (4.7%) had an elevated PSA post-ride. Using age-based normal ranges, eight participants (6.2%) had an elevated tPSA post ride. Only one participant that had an elevated concentration pre-cycling (by age-based normal ranges but not the standard 4.0 ng/ml) subsequently had a normal concentration post-cycling.

Univariate linear regression analysis revealed that the change in tPSA (log transformed) was positively correlated with both age (r = 0.44, p<0.001) and the distance cycled (r = 0.18, p<0.05). For every single year increase in age, there was a corresponding 1.9% increase in tPSA change (95% CI = 0.012–0.0258, p<0.0001). This is illustrated in Figure 1. Similarly, for every kilometre cycled, the change in tPSA (log transformed) increased by approximately 0.1% (95% CI = 0.000–0.0022, p = 0.04) When both age and distance cycled were entered simultaneously into the model, however, only age remained significantly related to the change in tPSA (p<0.001; model p<0.001; R2 = 0.202) (Table 3).

Figure 1. Univariate linear regression of age vs tPSA change (log transformed).

Table 3. Independent risk factors associated with increased tPSA levels.

A summary of the participants with elevated tPSA concentrations, and their clinical follow-up in relation to their PSA and prostate gland, is summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. Summary of tPSA results and follow-up, in participants with an elevated tPSA in either the pre- or post-ride test.


The purpose of the current study was to determine if long distance cycling increased tPSA in a group of male volunteers ≥50 years old. We found that cycling caused tPSA to increase significantly, by an average of 9.5%, immediately after ceasing cycling, and that the change in tPSA correlated with age and the distance cycled.

In terms of clinical significance, when using the standard PSA normal cut-off range of 4.0 ng/ml, elevated results were recorded in two participants pre-ride and tripled to six participants post-ride. Conversely, when using age based normal ranges, elevated results were recorded in five participants pre-ride and increased to eight participants post-ride. We considered this increase in proportion of elevated PSA results clinically significant, because recording a PSA concentration in the abnormal range may obscure the accuracy of PSA screening for prostate cancer, tipping some individuals into a range where further investigations would be considered appropriate. Any further investigations as a result of artificially elevated PSA may prove unnecessary, expensive, and have adverse physical and psychological impacts on the individual tested.

In examining why the current study design resulted in an increase in PSA when many prior studies have not, we must consider the age of participants, as this appears to be the most important confounding factor from previous designs. Using participants ≥50 years old our study found similar results to the 115 men in the ≥50 years age group of Safford and Crawford [22], who measured PSA subsequent to a four day mountain bike ride. We found a mean increase of 0.23 ng/ml (a 9.5% increase) compared to their result of 0.18 ng/ml which they found was statistically significant (p = 0.0079) but was not believed to be clinically significant, although they did not define what they considered was clinically significant.

Our study also concurs with the findings of Kindermann et al. [24], who tested 21 subjects with an average age of 61±5 years who completed a one hour cycle ergometer activity (they also had a subgroup complete a treadmill test seven days subsequently). They found an increase in tPSA of 25% (1.9±1.7 ng/ml), and free PSA (fPSA) of 92%. The treadmill activity also resulted in a rise in PSA of lesser magnitude. Unique when compared to previous studies, participants in the study by Kindermann et al. [24] were selected on the basis of having a high baseline PSA, without evidence of prostate cancer on biopsy, and this higher baseline seems to have had an impact on the magnitude of the increase and proportion of men demonstrating an increase in PSA.

A closer look at the majority of studies which did not demonstrate a change in PSA after cycling reveals that they sampled men of heterogeneous ages, or sampled only younger men, below the typical age for prostate cancer screening. For example, Saka et al. [20] studied athletes with an average age of 22.4 years (range 16–41 years) and student volunteers with an average age of 24.4 years (range 17–35 years), and tested them before and one hour after a 300 km bicycle ergometer ride. Total PSA, fPSA, and fPSA/tPSA ratio did not change significantly. Similarly, Hermann et al. [19] studied 42 men, with an average age of 35 years (range 29–41 years) before, 15 minutes after, and 3 hours after a 120 km off-road mountain bike race. Free PSA, tPSA, and cPSA were all found not to rise in this study group. Swain et al. [21] studied 20 participants with an average age of 40.7 years (range 27–54 years), riding from 51–162 km, finding no change in PSA. Similarly Banfia et al. [16] studied 12 cyclists with an average age of 22 years on a 24 minute incremental cycle ergometer test and found no change. Safford and Crawford et al. [22] also found no overall change in PSA when they analysed 260 volunteers as a whole. The reason why PSA was found not to change in these studies sampling younger participants may have been because their baseline PSA concentration was lower, and any change may have been less than the interassay coefficient of variation, rendering it not statistically significant.

Luboldt et al [18] tested 33 men with an average age of 61 years (range 50–74 years) before and 1 hour after riding for 90 minutes around a 13 mile (20.8 km) course and concluded that there was no change in both tPSA and fPSA. There was, however, a trend to a rise, but they sampled only 33 men and the result was not statistically significant. This was the only study that sampled men exclusively ≥50 years, without finding an increase in PSA post cycling.

Lippi et al. [17] studied tPSA and fPSA at quarterly intervals, at least 12 hours after exercise, more as a chronic marker. Two cohorts: elite and professional cyclists (average age 27.3 years) and elite cross-country skiers (average age 25.8 years) were individually compared against blood donors (average age 26.7 years) as the control group. No difference in tPSA and fPSA were found between these groups. Being quite a different design to the other cycling studies, it is difficult to postulate the reasons for their results.

Oremek and Seiffert [23] took a group of 301 hospital outpatients of a wide variety of ages (<25 to >70) who cycled on a bicycle ergometer for only 15 minutes, but specifically aimed for pelvic movement to maximize prostate manipulation. Notably these authors found a 2 to 3.3 fold increase in tPSA, fPSA and complexed PSA (cPSA), despite the wide variety of ages sampled, although no study since has demonstrated this magnitude of increase.

The second significant factor that we postulated may have resulted in finding no significant change in PSA with cycling from previous study designs was the interval between cycling and PSA testing. Our study sampled men within 5 minutes of completing their ride, whereas the studies by Saka et al. [20] and Luboldt et al. [18] sampled PSA an hour after completion of the ride.

It may be possible to postulate the duration of elevation of PSA post cycling by examining the study by Kindermann et al [24] in their study consisting of participants with a high baseline PSA. These authors found that for 62% of subjects, the maximum PSA was reached 15 minutes post-exercise (they sampled at 15 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, 180 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and on day 7). Their longer duration of post-cycling testing also found that at 48 hours 10 out of 21 volunteers (48%) had elevated results compared to when resting.

Examining cycling versus a similar prostatic manipulation, Tchetgen et al. [10] and Herschman et al. [11] considered ejaculation’s effect on PSA in men of a typical screening age (≥50 years) and each performed at least 3 post-ejaculation tests from 1 h post to 48 h post ejaculation. In the study by Tchetgen et al, total PSA was found to rise by 41%±4% at 1 hour, then decreased with subsequent tests. Combining the results of Herschman et al. and Tchetgen et al. respectively, at 1 hour 70–86% of men had an increase in tPSA (defined as >15% increase from baseline), 35–20% had an increase at 6 hours, and 40–8% at 24 hours. Herschman et al additionally analysed fPSA and percent free PSA (%fPSA). These parameters showed an increase in a greater proportion of men at 1 hour post ejaculation (100% of men for fPSA and 90% for %fPSA), but fell more rapidly than tPSA (20% having an increased fPSA and 30% having an increased %fPSA at 6 hours, 25% having an increased fPSA and 10% having an increased %fPSA at 24 h). Three studies showed no change [29], a decrease [30], or a decrease followed by an increase [31] in PSA post ejaculation, but had methodology variations such as taking the first sample at a time 24–48 h post ejaculation [29], [30], taking the first sample a wide variety of times post ejaculation [31], testing men well below screening age [30], or performing a DRE in between the first and second tests [31].

Examining another prostatic manipulation, the increase in PSA caused by DRE is usually of the order of 5–10% in studies which start sampling within 1 h after DRE [12], [14], [32]. Ornstein et al [13] showed that 31% and 48% of men had an increase (defined as >15% above baseline) in tPSA and fPSA respectively at 1 h, and that fPSA and tPSA returned to normal in all men by 24 h. Similar modest increases have been shown with flexible cystoscopy [6], [8], [14], [15], [33].

These studies assessing ejaculation, DRE and cystoscopy suggest that non-surgical manipulations of the prostate increase fPSA to a greater extent than complexed PSA (cPSA) (remembering that tPSA is a combination of both fPSA and cPSA). Free PSA and tPSA have been shown to have different half-lives (approximately 2–24 h for fPSA and 2.2–3 days for tPSA) [34][36], which may explain why the PSA increase in these non-surgical manipulations has been shown to be short-lived. Our study demonstrated that the manipulation of the prostate caused by cycling affected tPSA to a similar magnitude as ejaculation, DRE and cystoscopy. Extrapolating the current results to take account of those studies and other cycling studies, we assume that cycling is one of those types of manipulations which mostly releases fPSA into the serum. Combining the results of the current study and other studies demonstrating an increase in PSA with cycling, the findings support a period of abstinence of up to 48 h from cycling and possibly more, before a PSA test is taken.


According to the results of our study, cycling caused an average 9.5% increase in PSA, in healthy male cyclists over 50 years old, when measured within 5 minutes post cycling. This change is statistically and clinically significant. Based on the research published to date, the authors suggest a 24–48 hour period of abstinence from cycling and ejaculation is warranted prior to undertaking a PSA test. An elevated PSA result should also be assessed critically for the recent presence of these activities, and repeated as necessary.


Thanks to:

Victorian Institute of Sport, Melbourne, Australia, for supporting the study.

Ken Sikaris, Chemical pathologist, Melbourne Pathology, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia, for assistance with study design and understanding of the PSA test.

Professor Robin Daly, Chair of Exercise and Ageing, Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research (C-PAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia, for statistical analysis of data.

Associate Professor David R Webb, Urological Surgeon, Freemasons Hospital Medical Centre, East Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, and Associate Professor of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, for assisting with follow-up of participants who recorded an elevated PSA.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SLM. Performed the experiments: SLM JB SDH. Analyzed the data: SLM JB. Wrote the paper: SLM JB SDH.


  1. 1. Australian Bureau of Statistics report: Participation in Sport and Physical Recreation, Australia, 2009–2010. (Cat. No. 4177.0) Available:∼2011∼Chapter∼Participation+in+sport+and+physical+recreation?OpenDocument. Accessed 2012 Jun.
  2. 2. Wang MC, Papsidero LD, Kuriyama M, Valenzuela LA, Murphy GP, et al. (1981) Prostate antigen: a new potential marker for prostatic cancer. Prostate 2: 89–96.
  3. 3. The Cancer Council Queensland: The early detection of prostate cancer in general practice: supporting patient choice. 3/10/2007. Available: Accessed 2011 Dec.
  4. 4. Coley CM, Barry MJ, Fleming C, Fahs MC, Mulley AG (1997) Early detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Estimating the risks, benefits, and costs. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 126: 468–479.
  5. 5. Dixon SC, Knopf KB, Figg WD (2001) The control of prostate-specific antigen expression and gene regulation by pharmacological agents. Pharmacol Rev 53: 73–91.
  6. 6. Oesterling JE, Rice DC, Glenski WJ, Bergstralh EJ (1993) Effect of cystoscopy, prostate biopsy, and transurethral resection of prostate on serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. Urology 42: 276–282.
  7. 7. Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Ortega J-C, Daniel L, Roux F, et al. (1999) Kinetics of postbiopsy levels of serum free prostate-specific antigen and percent free prostate-specific antigen. Urology 53: 731–735.
  8. 8. Stamey TA (1989) Prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Monograph Urol 10: 49.
  9. 9. Price A, Attwood SE, Grant JB, Gray TA, Moore KT (1991) Measurement of prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase concentrations in serum before and 1–42 days after transurethral resection of the prostate and orchidectomy. Clin Chem 37: 859–863.
  10. 10. Tchetgen M-B, Song JT, Strawderman M, Jacobsen SJ, Oesterling JE (1996) Ejaculation increases the serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. Urology 47: 511–516.
  11. 11. Herschman JD, Smith DS, Catalona WJ (1997) Effect of ejaculation on serum total and free prostate-specific antigen concentrations. Urology 50: 239–243.
  12. 12. Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Ortega J-C, Roux F, Coulange C (1999) Effect of digital rectal examination on serum complexed and free prostate-specific antigen and percentage of free prostate-specific antigen. Urology 54: 857–861.
  13. 13. Ornstein DK, Rao GS, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Basler JW, et al. (1997) Effect of digital rectal examination and needle biopsy on serum total and percentage of free prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 157: 195–198.
  14. 14. Rodriguez-Rubio FI, Robles JE, Gonzalez A, Arocena J, Sanz G, et al. (1998) Effect of digital rectal examination and flexible cystoscopy on free and total prostate-specific antigen, and the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen. Differences between two PSA assays. Eur Urol 33: 255–260.
  15. 15. DeCastro BJ, Baker KC (2009) Effect of flexible cystoscopy on serum prostate-specific antigen values. Urology 73: 237–240.
  16. 16. Banfia G, Pontillo M, Dolci A, Roi GS (1997) Prostate-specific antigen is not increased in young men by ultraendurance sport performances. Clin Chem 43: 1465–1466.
  17. 17. Lippi G, Corgnati A, Salvagno G, Schena F, Franchini M, et al. (2005) Total and free PSA serum concentrations are not influenced by extensive physical exercise and bicycle riding. Int J Sports Med 26: 79–81.
  18. 18. Luboldt H-J, Peck KP, Oberpenning F, Schmid H-P, Luboldt W, et al. (2003) Bicycle riding has no important impact on total and free prostate-specific antigen serum levels in older men. Urology 61: 1177–1180.
  19. 19. Herrmann M, Scharhag J, Sand-Hill M, Kindermann W, Herrmann W (2004) Long-distance mountain biking does not disturb the measurement of total, free or complexed prostate-specific antigen in healthy men. Clin Chem Lab Med 42: 347–349.
  20. 20. Saka T, Sofikerim M, Demirtas A, Kulaksizoglu S, Caniklioglu M, et al. (2009) Rigorous bicycling does not increase serum levels of total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the free/total PSA ratio, gonadotropin levels, or uroflowmetric parameters. Urology 74: 1325–1330.
  21. 21. Swain RA, Montalto N, Ross D (1997) The effect of long-distance cycling on the prostate-specific antigen level. Arch Fam Med 6: 500–502.
  22. 22. Safford HR, Crawford ED, Mackenzie SH, Capriola M (1996) The effect of bicycle riding on serum prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 156: 103–105.
  23. 23. Oremek GM, Seiffert UB (1996) Physical activity releases prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from the prostate gland into blood and increases serum PSA concentrations. Clin Chem 42: 691–695.
  24. 24. Kindermann W, Lehmann V, Herrmann M, Loch T (2011) [Influencing of the PSA concentration in serum by physical exercise (especially bicycle riding)]. Urologe A 50: 188–196. [Article in German].
  25. 25. Frymann RJ, Nuttall MC, Carter PG (2006) Case report: Endurance cycle ride associated with a significant rise in PSA. Int Urol Nephrol 38: 161–162.
  26. 26. Rana A, Chisholm GD (1994) He sold his bike for a low prostate specific antigen. J Urol 151: 700.
  27. 27. Dejter SW, Martin JS, McPherson RA, Lynch JH (1988) Daily variability in human serum prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase: A comparative evaluation. Urology 32: 288–292.
  28. 28. el-Shirbiny AM, Nilson T, Pawar HN (1990) Serum prostate-specific antigen: hourly change/24 hours compared with prostatic acid phosphatase. Urology 35: 88–92.
  29. 29. Kirkali Z, Kirkali G, Esen A (1995) Effect of ejaculation on prostate-specific antigen levels in normal men. Eur Urol 27: 292–294.
  30. 30. Simak R, Madersbacher S, Zhang Z-F, Maier U (1993) The impact of ejaculation on serum prostate specific antigen. J Urol 150: 895–897.
  31. 31. Stenner J, Holthaus K, Mackenzie SH, Crawford ED (1998) The effect of ejaculation on prostate-specific antigen in a prostate cancer-screening population. Urology 51: 455–459.
  32. 32. Thomson RD, Clejan S (1992) Digital rectal examination-associated alterations in serum prostate-specific antigen. Am J Clin Pathol 97: 528–534.
  33. 33. Collins GN, Martin PJ, Wynn-Davies A, Brooman PJ, O’Reilly PH (1997) The effect of digital rectal examination, flexible cystoscopy and prostatic biopsy on free and total prostate specific antigen, and the free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio in clinical practice. J Urol 157: 1744–1747.
  34. 34. Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, et al. (1987) Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med 317: 909–916.
  35. 35. Richardson TD, Wojno KJ, Liang LW, Giacherio DA, England BG, et al. (1996) Half-life determination of serum free prostate-specific antigen following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 48: 40–44.
  36. 36. Gregorakis AK, Malovrouvas D, Stefanakis S, Petraki K, Scorilas A (2005) Free/total PSA (F/T ratio) kinetics in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Clin Chim Acta 357: 196–201.
  37. 37. Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Klee GG, Pettersson K, Piironen T, et al. (1995) Free, complexed and total serum prostate specific antigen: the establishment of appropriate reference ranges for their concentrations and their ratios. J Urol 154: 1090–1095.