Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Nutritional Care in a Nursing Home in Italy

Nutritional Care in a Nursing Home in Italy

  • Lorenzo Maria Donini, 
  • Barbara Neri, 
  • Stefania De Chiara, 
  • Eleonora Poggiogalle, 
  • Maurizio Muscaritoli
PLOS
x

Abstract

Introduction

Malnutrition is a clinical condition due to the imbalance among needs, intake and use of nutrients, leading to the increase of morbidity and mortality, and to the impairment of quality of life. Even in industrialized countries undernutrition is becoming an alarming phenomenon, especially involving elderly institutionalized subjects.

A multicentric study called PIMAI (Project Iatrogenic MAlnutrition in Italy), was carried out in Italy over 2005. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of malnutrition in hospitals and in nursing care homes (NH), to assess the level of nutritional attention and to measure the perceived quality in food and nutritional care.

This paper represents a preliminary analysis of data collected in a NH included in the PIMAI project.

Materials and methods

A total of 100 subjects (29 males and 71 females, aged 80.2±10 years), were recruited from January to June 2005 at the Clinical Rehabilitation Institute “Villa delle Querce” in Nemi (Rome), among patients in the NH facility. All the participants underwent a multidimensional geriatric evaluation (considering nutritional, clinical, functional and cognitive parameters), and a survey on “perceived quality” of nutritional care.

Results and discussion

According to nutritional status defined by the Mini Nutritional Assessment®, data analysis showed a high prevalence of malnutrition (36%) especially related to advanced age, chewing, cognitive and functional impairments. Patients seemed to consider nutrition to be important for their health; on the other hand, they were not thoroughly satisfied with the quality of food. Particularly, it was observed scarce attention to nutritional status from medical and nursing staff.

Conclusions

Our study confirms the need to pay greater attention to nutritional status in elderly institutionalized subjects. Medical and nursing teams need to be aware of the importance to perform an evaluation of nutritional status in these subset of subjects.

Introduction

Protein- energy malnutrition (PEM) is a clinical condition due to the imbalance between needs, intake and utililization of nutrients, leading to increased morbidity and mortality, and to the impairment of quality of life [1]. PEM is an alarming phenomenon that involves especially some categories such as elderly people, cancer patients, surgical patients and patients with acute and chronic organ failure and neurological diseases [2]. Prevalence of PEM is high even in industrialized countries, where it affects overall elderly people, increasing from 4% in the early nineties to 15% nowadays. It has been shown that over eighty -year old, hospitalized patients have a chance to develop malnutrition that is 5 times higher than patients who are younger than fifty years; moreover, elderly patients show a lower response to the treatment of PEM [3].

In Europe, considering the time of admission to hospital, prevalence of PEM ranges from 10 to 80%, with an average value of 35% [4] upon hospital admission, and it tends to worsen in most cases during the hospitalization [5], while in long- term care settings and in nursing homes the average prevalence is 30% [6][8].

PEM is not easy to manage in elderly patients because of their frailty due to comorbidities, disability and socio- economic problems [9][10].

In spite of the recommendations delivered by Scientific Societies and the European Community [11], data from the literature show that in 62–70% of cases malnutrition is not recognized on admission to hospital [12], [13], although a number of tools is available and validated for the geriatric age [14], [15].

Moreover, in elderly patients the effectiveness of nutritional interventions is reduced and the recovery from malnutrition is difficult to achieve [16][19]. The incidence of complications in malnourished people in nursing homes is 27% compared to 16% in well- nourished patients, while mortality is three times higher (12.4 vs. 4.7%) [20]. In fact, malnutrition affects the function of organs and systems [2], it decreases muscle mass and muscle strength promoting disability [21]; it impairs the immune response [22] increasing the incidence of hospital infections [23], increases the incidence of thrombosis [24], and delays healing of surgical wounds and pressure sores [25]. Depression and cognitive status impairment are also negatively affected by PEM, in turn triggering a vicious circle in which the subsequent loss of interest for food ends up in worsening the nutritional status [6], [26][29]. The deadly combination of above-mentioned consequences of PEM in turn determine a greater need for care, a longer hospital stay, a delay in the recovery from diseases and disability [30] and an increased rate of hospital readmissions [31].

Hence, malnutrition implies both direct and indirect high costs for National Health Services, the former linked to the condition itself, the latter due to the increased vulnerability, to repeated hospitalizations and to social reasons [32][33].

On the basis of all these remarks, a multicentric study called PIMAI (Project for Iatrogenic MAlnutrition in Italy), was carried out in Italy in 2005. The aims of the PIMAI study were to determine the prevalence of malnutrition in hospitals and in nursing care homes (NH), to assess the level of nutritional attention and to measure the perceived quality of food and nutritional care.

Data related to the hospitals involved in the PIMAI study were analysed and published [34], while this paper represents a preliminary analysis related to the data collected in a NH included in the PIMAI project.

Materials and Methods

The study was performed in 100 subjects (29 men and 71 women, aged 80.2±10 years), who were recruited from January to June 2005 among resident patients in the nursing home facility at the Clinical Rehabilitation Institute “Villa delle Querce” in Nemi (Rome), which was one of the eleven PIMAI selected nursing homes throughout Italy. This facility is a level III nursing home, where, according to Italian Health Service organization, only patients with more severe functional impairment can be admitted.

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the PIMAI coordinating centre (Regional General Hospital of Bolzano, Italy) and written informed consent was obtained by participants or their legally authorized representatives.

Random sampling from the daily list of new admissions was managed. All the subjects were considered eligible if they agreed to participate in the survey. Patients who presented with oedema, severe hepatic or renal failure, sepsis, or hypothyroidism, were excluded.

The characteristics of the subjects enrolled are reported in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Demographic, clinical, nutritional and functional characteristics of the study participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055804.t001

All the enrolled subjects underwent a multidimensional evaluation, including the following aspects and parameters:

  1. demographic, social and cultural parameters: gender, age, civil status and education level;
  2. the nutritional status:
    1. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA®) was administered [15]. Nutritional status was defined using the MNA threshold values:
      1. normal nutritional status: MNA score ≥24;
      2. risk of malnutrition: 17≤MNA score <23.5;
      3. malnutrition: MNA score <17;
    2. anthropometric parameters: body weight, height, arm circumference (AC), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), calf circumference (CC), knee height (KH).. In bedridden patients, body weight was measured using a bed- scale, while the height was estimated through KH.
      1. The body mass index (BMI = weight in Kg/height in m2), muscle arm circumference [MAC = (AC- TSF)×π], and stature for bedridden subjects [stature = 94.87−(1.58×KH)−(0.23×age)+4.8 for men] were calculated [35].
      2. Anthropometric measurements were performed following the procedures described in the “Anthropometric standardization reference manual” [36]. Anthropometric data collection was preceded by an inter- assessor alignment training session. The same tools were used in all the facilities involved in the PIMAI project: a SECA scale 86 (200 kg, to an accuracy of 100 g, certified and homologated as class III), a flexible metallic tape (200 cm, to an accuracy of 1 cm), a telescopic stadiometer (200 cm; 49 cm of telescopic arm), a Holtain Tanner Whitehouse plicometer, and an anthropometer with a graduated scale in centimeters.
    3. Muscle strength of the flexor muscles of the forearm, expressed in kg was measured using the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer performing the handgrip strength test on the dominant arm and following standardized procedures [37].
    4. A 2-day dietary recall was recorded by a dietician using the weighted average of the major food categories of macronutrients provided by the Italian National Institute for Research on Food and Nutrition (INRAN) [38].
    5. The presence of partial or total edentulism and the presence and effectiveness of any dental prosthesis.
    6. The degree of impairment of normal food intake according to the following scale:
      1. normal orexia (3 or more meals per day): 9–10 points;
      2. reduced orexia (if half a served amount was consumed): from 8 to 6 points;
      3. poor orexia (if most of the meal was refused) from 5 to 3 points;
      4. anorexia (unable to eat anything in 4 consecutive meals): <3 points.
  3. Clinical status:
    1. The comorbidity level was assessed by the Geriatric Index of Comorbidity [39] consisting in 4 items :
      1. Class I: patients with one or more asymptomatic diseases at a subclinical stage or successfully treated diseases in the past;
      2. Class II: one or more diseases with mild to moderate symptoms controlled by treatment;
      3. Class III: one or more diseases with severe symptoms poorly controlled by treatment;
      4. Class IV: one or more of these diseases at the maximum level of severity, not controlled by treatment;
      1. The definition of the severity of each disease was determined according to the Index of Disease Severity of Greenfield [40];
    2. Past medical history and number of current medications;
    3. The presence of symptoms potentially interfering with feeding: gastrointestinal symptoms (constipation, diarrhea, heartburn, nausea, vomiting), and pain, that was defined using the following modified version of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire [41]:
      1. I can tolerate the pain I have without having to use drugs;
      2. the pain is bad, but I can manage without having to take drugs;
      3. drugs provides me with complete relief from pain;
      4. drugs provides me with moderate relief from pain;
      5. drugs provides me with little relief from pain;
      6. drugs has no effect on my pain.
  4. Cognitive status and depression, respectively assessed using the SPMSQ-Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) [42] and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [43];
  5. Functional abilities were measured using the Karnofsky performance status test [44], the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) test [45] and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) test [46];
  6. Laboratory parameters: total protein content, albumin, transferrin, prealbumin, red blood cells count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, white blood cell count, lymphocytes count, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), mucoproteins, cholesterol, and cholinesterase levels were tested. Biochemical assays were performed at the ICR of “Villa delle Querce Nemi” (Rome) using commercial kits supplied by ABX Italy (Rome). A COBAS- MIRA analyser was used. Blood samples were obtained from the antecubital vein after an overnight fast.
  7. A survey about the “perceived quality” of nutritional assistance, food and diet was carried out 3 days after the admission, using a structured interview (table 2), including questions about the quality and quantity of food received, opinions on assistance during the meals and on nutritional advices provided by the health staff.

Data analysis and statistics

Nutritional status was correlated with other clinical and functional potential explanatory variables. After verification of the normal distribution of the variables, parametric tests for comparison of means (Student's t-test and ANOVA) and tests for the evaluation of the frequency distribution (Pearson's χ2 test) were performed. Statistical significance was set at p value<0.05.

Data were entered a Microsoft Excel database and analysed using the statistical software SPSS for Windows 10.0 (SPSS Inc. 1989–1999).

Results

Data analysis included all the 100 subjects recruited between January and June 2005 among resident patients in the nursing home facility at the Clinical Rehabilitation Institute “Villa delle Querce” in Nemi (Rome). Males subjects were slightly but not significantly younger than females (77±10 vs 82.7±9 years, p = 0.07).

Overall, accordingly to MNA®, prevalence of malnutrition was 36%; 46% of subjects were at risk of malnutrition, while the nutritional status was found to be normal only in 18% of participants. The prevalence was similar in both genders. About 12% of subjects lost at least 1 kg of body weight in the last three months, while more than 30% of subjects were obese (table 1).

Accordingly to the nutritional status defined with the MNA®15, data analysis showed the following results:

  1. social and cultural parameters (table 3): malnourished subjects were older (p<0.05) than the well- nourished counterparts, while a trend, but no statistically significant difference, was found for gender, civil status, and educational level;
  2. anthropometric and muscle strength variables (table 4): differences (p<0.05) were found for most of anthropometric variables and muscle strength parameters, that were significantly reduced in malnourished subjects;
  3. clinical status (table 5): no difference was found for clinical conditions (comorbidity, number of medications) according to nutritional status;
  4. symptoms and functions (table 5): hyporexia/anorexia, edentulism and inefficient dental prosthesis were more frequent in malnourished subjects(p<0.05);
  5. cognitive status, autonomy and depression (table 6): in malnourished subjects both cognitive (SPMSQ) and functional (Karnofsky, ADL, and IADL tests) impairments were more frequently observed while no difference was found for the GDS (p<0.05);
  6. laboratory parameters (table 7): lower levels of serum total proteins, albumin, red blood cells, haemoglobin, haematocrit and cholinesterase were found out in malnourished subjects (p<0.05). An increase of inflammatory parameters (CRP and mucoproteins) was found, even if not statistically significant for CRP;
  7. perceived quality of nutritional care (table 8): no differences were observed related to the nutritional status. Globally, patients considered food important for their health but they were not completely satisfied of the quality of food. They also noticed a low attention paid to nutritional status (e. g. body weight and height measurements, information provided about these parameters and other nutritional aspects) from medical and nursing staff.
thumbnail
Table 3. Nutritional status (MNA®) and social-cultural characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055804.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Anthropometric parameters and nutritional status according to MNA®.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055804.t004

thumbnail
Table 6. Functional status, cognitive impairment and depression according to nutritional status (defined by MNA®).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055804.t006

thumbnail
Table 7. Laboratory parameters according to nutritional status (defined by MNA®).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055804.t007

thumbnail
Table 8. Perceived quality of nutritional care related to nutritional status (MNA®).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055804.t008

Discussion

Carried out in a nursing home in Italy, as a part of the PIMAI multicentric project, this study showed a high prevalence of malnutrition, related in particular to functional and cognitive impairment. Patients seemed to be aware of the role of nutritional status in their life and they were asking for a more precise nutritional care and an improved quality of catering services.

The ageing process worsens the nutritional status and, consistently with different studies, in our sample malnourished subjects were older than non- malnourished counterparts (83.6±9 vs 73.7±10 years). Regarding social and cultural parameters, loneliness, poverty and a low educational level [47] are considered to be risk factors for anorexia in the elderly [12]. Ramic et al. [48] pointed out that people living in loneliness tend to reduce the number of daily meals and the intake of proteins, fruits and vegetables. The SOLINUT study [49] supports the hypothesis that social isolation is associated with an inadequate caloric intake to cover the normal daily energy requirements. In our study these associations are not completely verified, although a trend is evident: low educational level subjects and widowed patients are more frequently malnourished.

Data in our study confirm that ageing- induced malnutrition is usually secondary to a decrease in appetite and in food intake [50]. Early satiety in elderly people is due to anatomical and functional modifications in the stomach and to changes in the concentration of some hormones involved in appetite control (cholecystokinin and leptin) [51]. Moreover, the impairment of taste and smell, the reduction of visual and auditory acuity and dental problems contribute to reduce food intake in the elderly subjects [52], limiting the capacity to prepare meals [53] and reducing the chewing capability [54].

Regarding difficulties in chewing, we demonstrated that 41.7% of the malnourished subjects had a reduced food intake, 86.1% were partially edentulous and 76.5% had ineffective dental prosthesis. Some studies [55], [56] proposed and demonstrated the existence of a link among dental efficiency, food intake and malnutrition. Subjects with these problems tend to change their dietary habits eliminating all foods that are difficult and too hard to chew (fruits, vegetables and meat) with an inevitable impairment of the nutritional status.

Disability and cognitive impairment are further potential causes of malnutrition [20], [57][61].

The level of autonomy was assessed with three instruments: Karnofsky performance status test, activities daily living (ADL) test and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) test. Malnourished subjects seemed to have a greater level of disability in activities of daily living and with frequent requests of nursing assistance and medical care (as verified by the Karnofsky test score). These data are indirectly confirmed by the handgrip strength test, that showed deeply reduced values in malnourished subjects (3,93±7 vs 11,94±10 kg). These results are in line with existing literature: in most studies, disability is associated to biochemical and anthropometric parameters related to malnutrition, to the need for assistance and home care and to a longer stay in health care facilities [24], [27], [48], [58][60], [62]..

Similarly, the mental state may affect nutritional status and cognitive impairment is more common in malnourished than well-nourished subjects [59]. In our sample, the prevalence of malnutrition in severe mental impairment (>7 errors to the SPMSQ) was 66.7% while in subjects at risk of malnutrition and in well-nourished patients the prevalence decreased to 33,3 and 0%, respectively.

In several studies, depression is considered to be a risk factor for malnutrition and vice versa [6], [26][29]. Depression in the elderly may be justified by the loss of an active social role, loss of affects, disability and institutionalization. Inconsistently with the literature, in our study, mood was not correlated with nutritional status. However, the prevalence of depression and the score of the GDS showed a tendency to be greater in malnourished patients.

Previous studies of our group highlighted a relationship between nutritional status and comorbidity [62], [63]. In the present sample this association was not confirmed in a statistically significant fashion. However, a trend towards a poorer health status (comorbidity level III/IV) emerged in our malnourished subjects (23 vs 5.6%). Moreover, the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms as well as that of pain were higher in malnourished subjects (23,3 vs 0% and16,7 vs 0%, respectively). Furthermore, the laboratory parameters showed significant differences (with regard to proteins, red blood cells and cholinesterase levels) between malnourished and well-nourished subjects. Consistently with previous studies describing an association between inflammation and malnutrition in the elderly, in our sample of malnourished individuals, inflammatory markers were increased, although the rise of CRP levels was not statistically significant; similarly to clinical and comorbidity data in our sample, no significant differences were reported with respect of the nutritional status; we can hypothesize that a potential explanation may be the setting of recruitment: according to the Italian Health Service organization, in the facility patients with a severe functional impairment are usually admitted, with a relative stable and good clinical condition.

Improvement of the quality of life for residents in healthcare facilities may be achieved through the identification of critical points concerning in particular the quality of the catering service and the perceived quality of medical and nursing care [64], [65]. Therefore, an ad hoc questionnaire was created for the PIMAI project consisting of sixteen questions focused on the catering service and medical/nursing care dedicated to nutritional aspects. Our data show no statistically significant differences for these parameters in relation to nutritional status. Anyway, while considering food important for their health status, patients were not totally satisfied of the quality of diet in the NH. They also noticed a low attention paid to nutritional status from medical and nursing staff. Few studies in the literature dealt with the surveys on the perceived quality of diet and on the counseling received about nutrition in nursing homes. Lengyel et al. [66] pointed out that NH patients may have a good perceived quality of life, even if they are dissatisfied with the choices of food and the availability of “snacks”. Crogan et al. [67] as well as Carrier and coll. [68] described the utility of questionnaires for assessing perceived quality in health care facilities, that is directly proportional to the quality of life of patients, since adequate food in quality and quantity was essential not to lose weight and avoid protein- energy malnutrition. Noteworthy, the lack of interaction between caregiver and patient as well as the lack of competence of healthcare staff and the inadequate quality and quantity of food were shown to negatively affect food intake [69].

A limitation of the present study was the small sample size. The whole analysis of data collected in the full database of the PIMAI project will give further and more complete information. Another limitation is the setting of enrollment: our subjects were enrolled in a level III nursing home, where, according to Italian Health Service organization, only patients with more severe functional impairment can be admitted.

Finally, the present study stresses the need to pay greater attention to nutritional status in elderly institutionalized subjects. Medical and nursing staff need to be aware of the importance to perform the evaluation of nutritional status (especially anthropometric parameters and eating patterns) in this subset of subjects and to consider, in particular, cognitive and functional performances as risk factors for malnutrition. Patients seem to be aware of the role of nutritional status in their life and they ask for a more precise nutritional care and an improved quality of catering services. Individual factors play a pivotal role in malnutrition; on the other hand it has to be stressed that in nursing homes several organizational aspects work negatively influencing indirectly the onset or the worsening of malnutrition: for example, the amount of nursing staff available during meals to provide feeding assistance is crucial. Hence, multilevel models of analysis should be prompted in order to better evaluate the relevance of organizational features in terms of prevention and care of malnutrition in nursing home residents.

Therefore, the management of hospitals and nursing homes should take into account the quality of catering services as a way to improve nutritional and health status of elderly institutionalized subjects.

Acknowledgments

PIMAI Coordinating Team: L Lucchin (Dietetic and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Regional General Hospital, Bolzano, Italy), A D'Amicis (National Institute for Research on Food and Nutrition - INRAN, Rome, Italy), MA Fusco (Dietetic and Clinical Nutrition Unit, “S.Camillo-Forlanini” Hospital, Rome, Italy), N Battistini (Department of Applied Dietetic Technical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), MG Gentile (Dietetic and Clinical Nutrition Unit, “Niguarda-Ca Granda” Hospital, Milan, Italy), M Muscaritoli (Department of Clinical Medicine, University “La Sapienza”, Roma, Italy), A Palmo (Dietetic and Clinical Nutrition Unit, University Hospital San Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy).

Author Contributions

Significantly contributed to the work, read and approved the final manuscript: LMD BN SDC EP MM. Reviewed the manuscript: LMD MM. Conceived and designed the experiments: LMD MM. Analyzed the data: LMD MM. Wrote the paper: EP BN SDC.

References

  1. 1. Linee Guida SINPE per la Nutrizione artificiale ospedaliera (2002) Riv It Nut Parent Ent S5
  2. 2. Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M (2003) Disease-related malnutrition. An evidence based approach to treatment. Wallingford: CABI Publishing (CAB International).
  3. 3. Pirlich M, Schutz T, Norman K, Gastell S, Lübke HJ, et al. (2006) The German hospital malnutrition study. Clin Nutr 25: 563–72.
  4. 4. Edington J, BoormanJ, Durrant ER, Perkins A, Giffin CV, et al. (2000) Prevalence of malnutrition on admission to four hospitals in England. Clin Nutr 19: 191–5.
  5. 5. Szczygiel B (2006) Hospital malnutrition in patients hospitalized in Europe and in Poland. Polish J Food Nutr Sci 15 (Suppl 2):43–6.
  6. 6. Boström AM, Van Soest D, Kolewaski B, Milke DL, Estabrooks CA (2011) Nutrition status among residents living in a veterans' long-term care facility in Western Canada: a pilot study. J Am Dir Assoc 12(3): 217–25.
  7. 7. De Luis DA, López Mongil R, Gonzalez Sagrado M, Lopez Trigo JA, Mora PF, et al. (2011) Nutritional status in a multicenter study among institutionalized patients in Spain. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 15(3): 259–65.
  8. 8. Bourdel-Marchasson I, Rolland C, Jutand MA, Egea C, Baratchart B, et al. (2009) Undernutrition in geriatric institutions in South-West France: policies and risk factors. Nutrition 25(2): 155–64.
  9. 9. Fried LP (1992) Conference on the physiologic basis of frailty. Aging Clin Exp Res 4: 251–2.
  10. 10. Rockwood K, Hogan DB, MacKnight C (2000) Conceptualization and measurement of frailty in elderly people. Drugs Aging 17: 295–302.
  11. 11. Beck AM, Balknäs UN, Fürst P, Hasunen K, Jones L, et al. (2003) Council of Europe (the Committee of Experts on Nutrition, Food Safety and Consumer Health of the Partial Agreement in the Social and Public Health Field): Food and Nutritional care in hospitals: “How to prevent undernutrition” Council of Europe. . Clin Nutr 20(5): 455–60.
  12. 12. Kelly IE, Tessier S, Cahill A, Morris SE, Crumley A, et al. (2000) Lean ME.Still hungry in hospital: identifying malnutrition in acute hospital admissions. QJM 93: 93–8.t.
  13. 13. Hassan A, Ramadan M, Abdel-Rahman MO, Kerkadi A (2009) Prevalence of undernutrition in a long-term care facility in Qatar. J Nutr Elder 28(3): 313–22.
  14. 14. Cereda E, Pedrolli C, Zagami A, Vanotti A, Piffer S (2011) Body mass index and mortality in institutionalized elderly. J Am Med Dir Assoc 12(3): 174–8.
  15. 15. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ (1994) Mini nutritional assessment: a practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional status of elderly patients. Facts and Research in Gerontology. Supplement # 2: 15–59.
  16. 16. Donini LM, De Bernardini L, De Felice MR, Savina C, Coletti C, et al. (2004) Effect of nutritional status on clinical outcome in a population of geriatric rehabilitation patients. Aging Clin Exper Res 16: 132–8.
  17. 17. Pirlich M, Schutz T, Norman K, Gastell S, Lubke HJ, et al. (2006) The German hospital malnutrition study. Clin Nutr 25: 563–572.
  18. 18. Stratton RJ, Elia M (2006) Deprivation linked to malnutrition risk and mortality in hospital. Br J Nutr 96(5): 870–6.
  19. 19. Kubrak C, Jensen L (2007) Malnutrition in acute care patients: a narrative review. Int J Nurs Studies 44: 1036–1054.
  20. 20. Correia CM, Waitzberg DL (2003) The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr 22: 235–239.
  21. 21. Pikul J, Sharpe MD, Lowndes R, Ghent CN (1994) Degree of preoperative malnutrition is predictive of postoperative morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation 57: 469–472.
  22. 22. Hassen TA, Pearson S, Cowled PA, Fitridge RA (2007) Preoperative nutritional status predicts the severity of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) following major vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33: 696–702.
  23. 23. Schneider SM, Veyres P, Pivot X, Soummer AM, Jambou P, et al. (2004) Malnutrition is an independent factor associated with nosocomial infections. Br J Nutr 92: 105–111.
  24. 24. Andreyev HJ, Norman AR, Oates J, Cunningham D (1998) Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies. Eur J Cancer 8;34: 503–509.
  25. 25. Rai J, Gill SS, Kumar BR (2002) The influence of preoperative nutritional status in wound healing after replacement arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25: 417–421.
  26. 26. Harris CL, Fraser C (2004) Malnutrition in the institutionalized elderly: the effects on wound healing. Ostomy Wound Manage 50(10): 54–63.
  27. 27. Wojszel ZB (2006) Determinants of nutritional status of older people in long-term care settings on the example of the nursing home in Białystok. Adv Med Sci 51: 168–173.
  28. 28. Grieger JA, Nowson CA, Ackland LM (2009) Nutritional and functional status indicators in residents of a long-term care facility. J Nutr Elder 28(1): 47–60.
  29. 29. Lin LC, Wang TG, Chen MY, Wu SC, Portwood MJ (2005) Depressive symptoms in long-term care residents in Taiwan. J Adv Nurs 51(1): 30–37.
  30. 30. Hiesmayr M, Schindler K, Pernicka E, Schuh C, Schoeniger-Hekele A, et al. (2009) Nutrition Day Audit Team. Decreased food intake is a risk factor for mortality in hospitalized patients: the Nutrition Day survey 2006. Clin Nutr 28: 484–491.
  31. 31. Friedmann JM, Jensen GM, Smicklas-Wright J, McCamish MA (1997) Initial malnutrition predicting early non-elective hospital readmission in nutritionally compromised older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 65: 1714–20.
  32. 32. Amaral TF, Matos LC, Tavares MM, Subtil A, Martins R, et al. (2007) The economic impact of disease-related malnutrition at hospital admission. Clin Nutr 26: 778–784.
  33. 33. Kruizenga HM, Van Tulder MW, Seidell JC, Thijs A, Ader HJ, et al. (2005) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early screening and treatment of malnourished patients. Am J Clin Nutr 82: 1082–1089.
  34. 34. Cereda E, Lucchin L, Pedrolli C, D'Amicis A, Gentile MG, et al. (2010) Nutritional care routines in Italy: results from the PIMAI (Project: Iatrogenic MAlnutrition in Italy) study. Eur J Clin Nutr 64(8): 894–898.
  35. 35. Donini LM, De Felice MR, De Bernardini L, Ferrari G, Rosano A, et al. (2000) Prediction of stature in the Italian elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 4: 72–76.
  36. 36. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (1992) Manuale di riferimento per la standardizzazione antropometrica. EDRA, Milan (Italy)
  37. 37. Günther CM, Bürger A, Rickert M, Crispin A, Schulz CU (2008) Grip strength in healthy caucasian adults: reference values. J Hand Surg Am 33(4): 558–565.
  38. 38. INRAN – Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sugli Alimenti e la Nutrizione (2000) Tabelle di composizione degli alimenti. Carnevale E, Marletta L Eds; EDRA Milan (Italy)
  39. 39. Rozzini R, Frisoni GB, Ferrucci L, Barbisoni P, Sabatini T, et al. (2002) Geriatric Index of Comorbidity: validation and comparison with other measures of comorbidity. Age Ageing 31(4): 277–285.
  40. 40. Greenfield S, Apolone G, McNeil BJ, Cleary PD (1993) The importance of coexistent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Med Care 31(2): 141–54.
  41. 41. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66(8): 271–273.
  42. 42. Pfeiffer E (1975) Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. JAGS 23: 433–437.
  43. 43. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, et al. (1982) Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 17(1): 37–49.
  44. 44. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH (1949) The Clinical Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer. In: MacLeod CM (Ed), Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. Columbia Univ Press :196
  45. 45. Katz S (1970) Progress in the development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 1: 20–30.
  46. 46. Lawton MP, Brody M (1969) Assessment of older people: self-monitoring and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9: 179–186).
  47. 47. Morrone A, Donini LM, Scardella P, Piombo L, Pinto A, et al. (2011) Gruppo di Lavoro MEG. Malnutrition in the elderly: clinical features, psychological and social determinants. Preliminary results. . Ann Ig Mar–Apr;23(2): 161–172.
  48. 48. Ramic E, Pranjic N, Batic-Mujanovic O, Karic E, Alibasic E, et al. (2011) The effect of loneliness on malnutrition in elderly population. Med Arh 65(2): 92–95.
  49. 49. Ferry M, Sidobre B, Lambertin A, Barberger-Gateau P (2005) The SOLINUT study: analysis of the interaction between nutrition and loneliness in persons aged over 70 years. J Nutr Health Aging 9(4): 261–268.
  50. 50. Morley JE (1996) Anorexia in older persons: epidemiology and optimal treatment. Drugs Aging 8: 134–155.
  51. 51. Morley JE (2001) Anorexia, sarcopenia, and aging. Nutrition 17: 660–663.
  52. 52. Schiffman SS (1997) Taste and smell losses in normal aging and disease. The Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 1375–1381.
  53. 53. Garry PJ (1994) Nutrition and aging. In: Geriatric Clinical Chemistry: Reference values, edited by W.R. Faulkner and S. Meites (Washington: American Association for Clinical Chemistry Press) p.84–72.
  54. 54. Donini LM, Savina C, Cannella C (2003) Eating Habits and Appetite Control in the Elderly: The Anorexia of Aging. International Psychogeriatrics 15: 73–87.
  55. 55. Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO, Gonçalves TM, Lucena SC, Barbosa CM (2010) Nutritional effects of implant therapy in edentulous patients–a systematic review. Implant Dent 19(3): 196–207.
  56. 56. Hutton B, Feine J, Morais J (2002) Is there an association between edentulism and nutritional state? J Can Dent Assoc 68(3): 182–187.
  57. 57. Wojszel ZB (2006) Determinants of nutritional status of older people in long-term care settings on the example of the nursing home in Białystok. Adv Med Sci 51: 168–173.
  58. 58. Oliveira MR, Fogaça KC, Leandro-Merhi VA (2009) Nutritional status and functional capacity of hospitalized elderly. Nutr J 8: 54.
  59. 59. Soto ME, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Vellas B (2005) REAL.FR group. Rapid cognitive decline: searching for a definition and predictive factors among elderly with Alzheimer's disease. J Nutr Health Aging 9(3): 158–161.
  60. 60. Schneider SM, Veyres P, Pivot X, Soummer AM, Jambou P, et al. (2004) Malnutrition is an independent factor associated with nosocomial infections. Br J Nutr 92: 105–111.
  61. 61. Sullivan DH, Bopp MM, Roberson PK (2002) Protein-energy undernutrition and life-threatening complications among the hospitalized elderly. J Gen Intern Med 17: 923–932.
  62. 62. Donini LM, De Felice MR, Savina C, Coletti C, Paolini M, et al. (2011) Predicting the outcome of long-term care by clinical and functional indices: the role of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 15(7): 586–592.
  63. 63. Donini LM, De Felice MR, Tagliaccica A, De Bernardini L, Cannella C (2005) Comorbidity, frailty, and evolution of pressure ulcers in geriatrics. Med Sci Monit 11(7): 326–336.
  64. 64. Wright OR, Capra S, Connelly LB (2010) Foodservice satisfaction domains in geriatrics, rehabilitation and aged care. J Nutr Health Aging 14(9): 775–780.
  65. 65. Donini LM, Castellaneta E, De Guglielmi S, De Felice MR, Savina C, et al. (2008) Improvement in the quality of the catering service of a rehabilitation hospital. Clin Nutr 27: 105–114.
  66. 66. Lengyel CO, Smith JT, Whiting SJ, Zello GA (2004) A questionnaire to examine food service satisfaction of elderly residents in long-term care facilities. J Nutr Elder 24(2): 5–18.
  67. 67. Crogan NL, Evans B, Velasquez D (2004) Measuring nursing home resident satisfaction with food and food service: initial testing of the FoodEx-LTC. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59(4): 370–377.
  68. 68. Carrier N, West GE, Ouellet D (2009) Dining experience, foodservices and staffing are associated with quality of life in elderly nursing home residents. J Nutr Health Aging 13(6): 565–570.
  69. 69. Crogan NL, Shultz JA (2000) Nursing assistants' perceptions of barriers to nutrition care for residents in long-term care facilities. J Nurses Staff Dev 16(5): 216–221.