We previously demonstrated that aged ovariectomized rats that had received prior estradiol treatment in middle-age exhibited increased levels of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in the hippocampus as well as enhanced hippocampal dependent memory as compared to aged rats that had not received mid-life estradiol treatment. These effects persisted long after the estradiol treatment had been terminated. The goal of the current experiment was to determine if increased expression of ERα in the hippocampus, in the absence of exogenously administered estrogens, can impact the hippocampus and cognitive function in aging ovariectomized rats. Middle-aged rats were trained for 24 days on an eight-arm radial maze spatial memory task. All rats were then ovariectomized. Forty days later, rats received either lentiviral delivery to the hippocampus of the gene encoding ERα (lenti-ERα) or a control virus. Rats were tested on delay trials in the radial-maze in which delays of varying lengths were imposed between the fourth and fifth arm choices. Following behavior testing, hippocampi were immunostained using western blotting for ERα, the ERα-regulated protein choline acetyltransferase, and phosphorylation of the ERα-regulated kinases, ERK/MAPK and Akt. Results revealed that aging ovariectomized rats that received delivery of lenti-ERα to the hippocampus exhibited enhanced spatial memory as indicated by increased arm-choice accuracy across delays as compared to ovariectomized rats that received control virus. Western blot data revealed that lenti-ERα delivery significantly increased levels of ERα and phosphorylated ERK/MAPK and had no impact on levels of ChAT or phosphorylation of Akt. Results indicate that increasing hippocampal levels of ERα in aging females in the absence of ovarian or exogenously administered estrogens leads to increases in phosphorylation of ERK/MAPK as well as in enhanced memory.
Citation: Witty CF, Foster TC, Semple-Rowland SL, Daniel JM (2012) Increasing Hippocampal Estrogen Receptor Alpha Levels via Viral Vectors Increases MAP Kinase Activation and Enhances Memory in Aging Rats in the Absence of Ovarian Estrogens. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051385
Editor: Lisa Carlson Lyons, Florida State University, United States of America
Received: September 11, 2012; Accepted: November 2, 2012; Published: December 11, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Witty et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant 0951008 and National Institute of Aging Grant R01AG041374 to JMD and National Institute of Aging Grants AG014979, AG037984, AG036800, and the Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation to TCF. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Results of basic research conducted over the last two decades support a role for estrogens and estrogen receptors in the modulation of learning and memory –. Expression of the best characterized estrogen receptors, ERα and ERβ  has been confirmed in brain regions important for cognition including the hippocampus –, where they have been localized to nuclear  and extranuclear  sites. These receptors can act through nuclear-mediated signaling by which they impact gene transcription through association with estrogen response elements (ERE) located on target genes . Recent evidence indicates that ERα and ERβ can also act through membrane-mediated signaling by which they activate cellular kinase cascades including the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK/MAPK)  and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt  pathways. The importance of estrogen receptor signaling to cognitive function is highlighted by the growing literature indicating that age-related changes in estrogen receptor expression and function in the brain impacts female cognitive aging , . For example, in women polymorphisms ,  and decreased expression of ERα  are associated with age-related cognitive decline.
Results of our investigation into the long-term impact on the brain and memory of short-term exposure to estrogens in middle-age are consistent with a role for ERα in female cognitive aging. Aged ovariectomized rats that previously had been treated with estradiol for 40 days during middle-age displayed enhanced memory performance as compared to aged ovariectomized rats that had no estradiol treatment . Furthermore, aged rats that had received prior estradiol treatment in middle-age also exhibited increased expression of ERα in the hippocampus with no change in levels of ERβ. Remarkably, the increased levels of ERα and cognitive enhancement induced by prior estradiol exposure were lasting, as they were evident eight months after estradiol treatment was terminated. In association with lasting changes in cognition and levels of ERα were increases in levels of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), the synthesizing enzyme for acetylcholine. ChAT is regulated by ERα  and identification of a putative ERE on the ChAT gene  provides a potential site for direct regulation of ChAT by ERα. Thus, our data suggest that ERα can impact target genes and proteins as well as spatial memory in aging females in the absence of ovarian estrogens.
The hypothesis that hippocampal ERα can positively impact cognition in the absence of ovarian or endogenously administered estrogens is supported by data in which viral-vector delivery of ERα to the hippocampus of young adult ovariectomized ERα knockout mice improved performance on a task of spatial learning and memory . The goal of the current study was to expand on these data and test the hypothesis that increased levels of ERα in the hippocampus positively impact cognition in aging females in the absence of ovarian or exogenously administered estrogens. To test our hypothesis, we assessed effects on spatial memory across various memory loads of viral-vector delivery of ERα to the hippocampus of aging ovariectomized rats. To explore putative mechanisms by which ERα may affect cognition in the absence of ovarian estrogens, we used western blotting to determine effects of treatment on hippocampal levels of the ERα-regulated protein, ChAT, as well as activation of ERα-mediated signaling cascades as measured by levels of phosphorylated ERK/MAPK and Akt.
Materials and Methods
Construction of Lenti-viral Vectors
Before using our lenti-viral vectors to test our hypotheses, we examined their expression in rat hippocampus to determine if the transfection efficacy in rats was similar to what we previously reported for transduction of ERα in ERαKO mice . Briefly, lentiviral vectors were constructed with an EF1α promoter driving a fluorescent marker (cherry) and CMV promoter driving human estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) tagged with FLAG (pFIN-EF1α-CHER-CMV-ERαFLAG-WPRE). The FLAG tag does not influence receptor activity ,  and permits the localization of transfected receptors. For examination of lentiviral transduction in rat hippocampus, the ERα and reporter gene vectors were packaged into lentivirus using previously described methods , . Rats were ovariectomized and two virus injections (1×106 transducing units of virus in 0.5 µl) were delivered per hippocampus. Strong expression was observed within 9 days after injection. We confirmed that transfection efficacy in rats was similar to what we previously reported for transduction of ERα in ERαKO mice , with intense expression observed for 1000 µm in either direction (anterior-posterior, medial-lateral) from the center of each injection. Beyond this range, individual cells and their dendrites transduced with lentiviral constructs could still be easily identified. The expression of the FLAG tagged ERα could be observed in the nucleus and in dendrites (Figure 1).
After confirming efficacy of our viral vectors, we purchased animals that were used to test our hypotheses. Fourteen middle-aged female Long-Evans hooded rats, retired breeders (∼11 months of age), were purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley Inc. (Indianapolis, IN). All animals used in the study had experienced multiple pregnancies. Whether results of the present study would generalize to results obtained using virgin rats remains to be determined because reproductive histories of rats affect the hippocampus and hippocampus-dependent behavior , . Rats were housed individually in a temperature-controlled vivarium under a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle and had unrestricted access to food and water. See Figure 2 for an overview of the experimental timeline.
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tulane University (Permit Number: 0393). All surgery was performed under anesthesia induced by ketamine and xylazine and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
One week after arrival, rats were placed on diets to maintain body weights at 85–90% of pre-surgery weights and were trained to obtain food rewards (Froot Loops; Kellogg Co., Battle Creek, MI) from the arms of an elevated eight-arm radial maze purchased from Lafayette Instruments (Lafayette, IN). The maze consisted of black metal floors and clear acrylic walls with arms (10 cm wide × 70 cm long × 20 cm high) extending out from an octagonal center (33 cm across). The maze was located in the center of a 3×5 m room and raised approximately 1 m from the floor. Several extramaze cues, including overhead fluorescent lights, desk, chairs, sink, and door, were visible from the maze.
To begin a trial, a rat was placed in the center compartment in a pseudorandom orientation and had access to all eight arms. Arm choices were recorded by an observer seated in a fixed location approximately 1 m away from the maze. An arm choice was scored if the rat traversed half the length of an arm. Food rewards, located in recessed cups at the end of each arm, were not visible until the rat reached the end of an arm. To control for possible odor cues, each cup contained froot loop residue that was present throughout the experiment. An arm choice was scored if the rat traversed half the length of an arm. Rats were allowed to choose arms in any order until all arms had been visited or 5 min had elapsed. Errors were reentries into previously visited arms. Performance was assessed by the number of errors of the first eight arm choices. Each animal received one trial per day across 24 days of acquisition.
Following radial maze acquisition, rats were ovariectomized while under anesthesia induced by injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg ip; Bristol Laboratories, Syracuse, NY) and xylazine (7 mg/kg ip; Miles Laboratories, Shawnee, KS). Rats were trained on the radial maze acquisition task once per week to retain performance levels until testing (see below).
Delivery of Lentiviral Vectors
Forty days after ovariectomy, a time period of ovarian hormone deprivation that we previously showed significantly decreases hippocampal levels of ERα , rats were randomly assigned to receive lentiviral delivery to the hippocampus of the gene encoding both ERα and the reporter gene, pFIN-EF1α-CHER-CMV-ERαFLAG-WPRE (Lenti-ERα; n = 8) or a control virus carrying the reporter gene alone, pFIN-EF1α-CHER-WPRE (Lenti-Cherry; n = 6) . Rats were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine and placed into a stereotaxic frame. An incision was made in the scalp and fascia that overlie the skull. Four holes (two for each hemisphere) were drilled in the skull and a Hamilton syringe containing either control cherry lentivirus or lenti-ERα was lowered in each hole through which 1 µl of virus was infused at two sites in the dorsal-ventral plane. Thus a total of eight infusion sites (−2.5 AP, ±1.5 ML, −2.8/−3.8 DV and −3.6 AP, ±1.9 ML, −2.6/−3.8 DV relative to Bregma; ) were used. Based on preliminary data in which we saw intense expression of virus 1000 µm from infusion sites (see above description under Construction of lenti-viral vectors), the current infusion sites were chosen to provide intense coverage in CA1 and dentate gyrus of the dorsal hippocampus, with some expression extending into CA3. Rats were given two weeks to recover and to allow for optimal expression of the virus before behavioral testing.
Rats were re-trained in the maze for two days using the same acquisition protocol as described above. Performance of all rats was at pre-surgery levels as measured by number of errors of the first 8 choices. Additionally, the rate at which rats completed the maze task was also at pre-surgery levels, indicating that viral infusions did not impact motor or other non-mnemonic functions. Behavioral testing consisted of daily delay trials in the radial maze during which various delays (1 minute –6 hours) were imposed between the fourth and fifth arm choices to increase memory load . Consequently, the animal had to remember over an extended period of time which arms had already been visited. After each fourth arm choice, the animal was removed from the maze and put in a holding cage in a separate room for the delay period. Following the delay, the animal was returned to the maze until the four remaining, still baited arms, had been visited or until 5 min had elapsed. If an animal consistently failed to eat food rewards during pre-delay trials, it was excluded from the experiment because of concerns regarding validity of data collected post-delay. Arm choice accuracy was measured by the total number of errors in the first eight choices and by the number of post-delay retroactive errors. A retroactive error was the first (and only the first) reentry into an arm already visited prior to the delay . Rats were given one day of habituation to a one-minute delay trial to allow the animal to become accustomed to being removed from the maze midway through testing. Subsequently, two trials (one per day) were conducted for each delay beginning with a one-minute delay. Two rats (one Lenti-ERα and one Lenti-Cherry) persistently failed to consume food rewards and were excluded from the experiment.
Tissue Dissection and Processing
Approximately two days following behavior testing, all behaviorally tested animals were killed and the dorsal hippocampus from each hemisphere of each rat was dissected on ice, quick-frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80°C until processing. Tissue was homogenized in 15 µl/mg lysis buffer containing 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris, 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate tetrabasic decahydrate, 4 mM 4-nitrophenyl phosphate disodium salt hexahydrate, 0.1 µM microcystin, and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). Samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 1000×g at 4°C, protein concentration of supernatants was determined (Bradford Protein Assay Kit; Pierce, Rockford, IL), and each sample was diluted 1∶1 with Laemmli Sample Buffer (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA) mixed with 350 mM D,L-dithiothreitol, boiled for 5 min, and stored at −80°C.
Electrophoresis and Western Blotting
For each sample obtained from each rat, 35 µg of total protein were loaded and separated at 200 V on 7.5% (ERα, total and phospho-Akt) or 10% (ChAT, total and phospho-p42/p44 MAPK) SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad) for 60 min. Molecular weight markers (Kaleidoscope; Bio-Rad) were included with each run. The specificity of the ERα antibody used was previously determined . Furthermore, MCF-7 cells (Santa Cruz; Santa Cruz, CA) and uterus samples were included as positive controls for ERα. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes at 100V for 1 h. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in 0.1% Tween/1 X Tris-buffered saline (TTBS) at room temperature for 1 h. Following this, membranes were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C in 1% nonfat dry milk-TTBS. Primary antibodies used were for ERα (rabbit polyclonal, 1∶750; Santa Cruz), ChAT (mouse monoclonal, 1∶1500; Millipore), phospho-p42/p44 MAPK (rabbit polyclonal, 1∶1000; Cell Signaling), and phospho-Akt (rabbit monoclonal, 1∶4000; Cell Signaling). Blots were washed three times for 15 min each with TTBS and incubated with 5% nonfat dry milk containing secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 1.5 h at room temperature. Secondary antibodies used were goat antirabbit IgG (ERα, 1∶40,000; phospho-p42/p44 MAPK, 1∶5,000; phospho-Akt, 1∶2000; Santa Cruz) or goat antimouse IgG (ChAT, 1∶40,000; Santa Cruz). Blots were washed again three times for 15 min each and incubated with the chemiluminescent substrate SuperSignal West Femto (ERα, ChAT) for 5 min (Fisher Scientific) or Pierce ECL (total and phospho-p42/p44 MAPK; total and phospho-Akt) for 1 min (Fisher Scientific) and exposed to film (Kodak Biomax MR) for varying durations to capture optimal signal intensity. To stain for total p42/p44 MAPK, total Akt, and the loading control β-actin, blots were washed and stripped with stripping buffer (RestorePlus Western Blot; Fisher Scientific) for 45 min at 37°C. Blots were then blocked and incubated with primary antibodies for p42/p44 MAPK (rabbit polyclonal, 1∶4000; Cell Signaling), Akt (rabbit polyclonal, 1∶1000; Cell Signaling), or β-actin (mouse monoclonal, 1∶15,000; Santa Cruz) overnight at 4°C in 1% nonfat dry milk-TTBS. Blots were washed three times for 15 min each with TTBS and incubated in 5% nonfat dry milk containing goat antirabbit IgG (p42/p44 MAPK, 1∶10,000; Akt, 1∶5000; Santa Cruz) or goat antimouse IgG (β-actin, 1∶10,000; Santa Cruz) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase 1.5 h at room temperature, washed, and detected by chemiluminescence. Films were imaged using MCID Core imaging software (InterFocus Imaging Ltd., Cambridge, England), and optical density x area was measured for bands of interest. Mean values were calculated from the Lenti-Cherry control samples. All values were represented as a percentage relative to the average control value.
Two procedures were conducted to confirm endocrine status. First, daily vaginal smears were collected by lavage during the final 2 weeks before stereotaxic surgery. Slides were stained with 0.2% toluidine blue, and microscopically examined. Smears of all ovariectomized rats were characterized by a predominance of leukocytes. Second, at the time the rats were killed, 1-cm-long sections of the right uterine horn (cut at the base) were extracted and weighed. All rats presented with atrophied uterine horns, confirming success of ovariectomies.
Arm-choice accuracy data (number of total errors and number of retroactive errors) from each delay were averaged across the two days of testing and analyzed by two-ANOVA (treatment x delay) with treatment as the between subjects factor and repeated measures on delay. Western blotting data were analyzed by independent sample t-tests with treatment as the factor.
As illustrated in Figure 3, rats that received hippocampal infusions of lentivirus that contained the gene for ERα (Lenti-ERα) tended to make fewer errors in the first eight arm choices in the radial-arm maze across delay trials than rats infused with the control virus (lenti-cherry). Two-way ANOVA revealed a nearly significant effect of treatment (F(1,10) = 3.885, P = .077) indicating greater accuracy in the Lenti-ERα rats (Figure 3A). There was a main effect of delay (F(5,50) = 2.665, P = .033) on arm-choice accuracy indicating that increasing the delay negatively impacted accuracy (Figure 3B). There was no interactive effect of delay and treatment.
As illustrated in Figure 4, rats that received lenti-ERα made significantly fewer retroactive errors than rats that received lenti-cherry. Two-way ANOVA revealed a main effect of treatment (F(1,10) = 5.136, P = .047) indicating significantly greater accuracy in the Lenti-ERα rats for information that had to be remembered across delays (Figure 4A). There was no effect of delay on number of retroactive errors indicating that length of delay did not impact accuracy (Figure 4B). There was no interactive effect of delay and treatment.
Western blotting. ERα.
As illustrated in Figure 5, we were able to successfully increase levels of ERα in the hippocampus through the use of lentiviral vectors. Western blots revealed a band of ERα-like immunoreactivity at approximately 66 kDa. In addition, a single band of interest at approximately 43 kDa was detected on immunostaining for the loading control, β-actin. There was a significant effect of treatment (t(10) = 2.519, P = 0.03) for protein levels of ERα, indicating that rats that received lenti-ERα infusions had significantly increased levels of ERα in the hippocampus as compared to rats that received control lenti-cherry infusions. There was no significant effect of treatment on protein levels of β-actin.
As illustrated in Figure 6, lenti-ERα infusions did not affect levels of choline acetyltransferase, an ERα-target protein, in the hippocampus. Western blots revealed a band of ChAT-like immunoreactivity at approximately 67 kDa. There was no significant effect of treatment for protein levels of ChAT or β-actin.
Phosphorylated and total ERK/MAPK and Akt.
As illustrated in Figure 7, lenti-ERα infusions increased phosphorylation of MAPK, but not Akt, in the hippocampus. Western blots revealed bands of phosphorylated and total p42 and p44 MAPK-like immunoreactivity at approximately 42 and 44 kDa, respectively. There was a significant effect of treatment (t(10) = 2.321, P = 0.043) for protein levels of phosphorylated p42 MAPK, indicating that rats that received lenti-ERα infusions had significantly increased levels of phosphorylated p42 MAPK in the hippocampus compared to rats that received control lenti-cherry infusions (Figure 7A). There was no significant effect of treatment on protein levels of phosphorylated p44 MAPK or total p42 or p44 MAPK.
Western blot data showing the effects of Lenti-ERα or Lenti-Cherry on levels of phosphorylated p44 MAPK and phosphorylated p42 MAPK (A), and phosphorylated Akt (B) in the hippocampus. Mean density x area (+SEM) expressed relative to Lenti-Cherry control. * P = .043 vs. Lenti-Cherry. Representative blot images for phosphorylated and total p44 MAPK, p42 MAPK, and Akt are shown in insets above the graph.
Western blots revealed bands of phosphorylated and total Akt-like immunoreactivity at approximately 60 kDa. There was no significant effect of treatment for protein levels of phosphorylated or total Akt (Figure 7B).
The results of the current experiment demonstrate for the first time that increasing levels of ERα in the hippocampus of aging females in the absence of ovarian or endogenously administered estrogens increases activation an ERα-regulated kinase and enhances cognitive function. Lenti-viral delivery of the gene encoding ERα to the hippocampus of middle-aged ovariectomized rats resulted in significantly improved ability to remember information across time delays in a hippocampus-dependent radial-arm maze task as compared to hippocampal delivery of a control virus. In addition to impacting cognition, increasing hippocampal levels of ERα resulted in increased levels of phosphorylated ERK/MAPK, regulation of which is mediated by ERα signaling. These data provide support for the hypothesis that treatments that increase or maintain levels of ERα in the hippocampus in aging females are beneficial to the hippocampus and hippocampus-dependent behavior. Importantly, they demonstrate that cognitive benefits exerted by increased levels of ERα present following the cessation of ovarian function do not require administration of estrogens to be expressed.
The current data demonstrate that increasing levels of hippocampal ERα in ovariectomized rats can impact learning and memory in a similar manner as does exogenous administration of estrogens. For example, like the effects of viral-vector delivery of ERα to aging ovariectomized rats in the current experiment, estradiol administration to young adult ,  and aging ,  ovariectomized rats increases arm-choice accuracy on radial-maze tasks designed to test hippocampus-dependent working memory. Further, the delay-dependent effect of increased ERα on memory evident in the current experiment, which is demonstrated by the increasingly disparate performance between groups across time delays until convergence at the longest delay, is consistent with data indicating that impacts of estrogens on memory are most apparent when memory load is increased . Obviously, it remains to be determined if the impact on learning and memory of increased levels of ERα in aging females will parallel the complex effects of estrogens on learning and memory, which are impacted by numerous factors including dose, type of estrogen, type of memory assessed, age of animals and period of ovarian hormone deprivation , –. Nevertheless, the current data suggest that manipulations that result in increases or possibly maintenance of ERα in the hippocampus in aging females provide similar enhancement to hippocampus-dependent memory as does administration of estrogens.
In the absence of ovarian or exogenously administered estrogens, ERα may be activated by novel mechanisms involving ligand-dependent and ligand-independent actions. For example, ERα may be activated via estradiol synthesized locally in the hippocampus , which can influence synaptic plasticity ,  and exert neuroprotective effects . In addition to the classical hormone-mediated estrogen receptor action, ERα function can be modulated by extracellular signals. These ligand-independent actions may involve the ability of growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor-I and epidermal growth factor to activate estrogen receptor and increase expression of estrogen receptor target genes and proteins , . The present results suggest that treatments that increase or maintain levels of ERα following the cessation of ovarian function could allow the system to take advantage of these novel mechanisms of estrogen receptor action, leading to the maintenance of cognitive function during aging. Prior results from our lab demonstrate that in aged female rats, previous estradiol exposure for 40 days in middle-age begun at the time of ovariectomy resulted in increased levels of hippocampal ERα as well as enhanced cognitive function up to eight months following the termination of the estradiol treatment . The present results support the possibility that the persistent increase in hippocampal levels of ERα induced by short-term exposure to estradiol following the cessation of ovarian function is a feasible mechanism by which short-term estradiol exposure in midlife could permanently enhance cognition.
In addition to enhancing cognition, increasing hippocampal levels of ERα via viral vector delivery increased phosphorylation of ERK/MAPK in the hippocampus, results consistent with the possibility of novel mechanisms involving ligand-dependent and/or ligand-independent actions at ERα. For example, hippocampus-derived estradiol is hypothesized to act locally at membrane estrogen receptors, including ERα , and activation of putative membrane ERα increases ERK/MAPK activation in hippocampal neurons . Further, ligand-independent activation of ERα by growth factors involves ERK/MAPK signaling . The implications for the hippocampus of increased ERα-induced ERK/MAPK phosphorylation by these novel mechanisms are demonstrated by data in which ERα-induced ERK/MAPK phosphorylation has been linked to the ability of estradiol to rapidly induce synaptic plasticity  and neuroprotection  in hippocampal neurons. A functional significance for memory of the ability of increased levels of ERα to impact ERK/MAPK signaling is suggested by the report that estradiol-induced enhancement of object memory consolidation requires activation of ERK/MAPK . Further investigation is warranted to determine why, in the current results, increased levels of ERα impact ERK/MAPK and not Akt phosphorylation, which also has been linked to ERα activation in the hippocampus . Nevertheless our data demonstrate, to our knowledge for the first time, that overexpressing ERα in the brain can impact an ERα-activated kinase in the absence of ovarian or exogenously administered estrogens.
In the current study, we saw no effect of viral vector delivery of ERα to the hippocampus on levels of ChAT. These results are in contrast to our previous results in which in parallel to increases in ERα induced by a previous short-term exposure to estradiol, aging ovariectomized rats also displayed increases in levels of ChAT . There are several possible explanations for this discrepancy. Obviously, the increased expression of ERα induced by previous treatment with estradiol and that induced by viral vector delivery can vary in a number of ways, including compartmental localization and pattern of expression across hippocampal subfields. In addition, the lentiviral delivery of ERα was limited to the hippocampus and did not affect neurons in the basal forebrain, the source of hippocampal cholinergic input . Further, immunostaining using western blotting techniques may not be sensitive enough to detect subtle localized changes in ChAT levels. Finally, current results that reveal a lack of effect of lenti-viral delivery of ERα on ChAT, which is regulated by ERα at the transcriptional level , and an increase activation of ERK/MAPK, which is regulated by ERα by membrane-mediated signaling , suggest that our lenti-viral delivery of ERα may exert its effects on hippocampus-dependent memory via membrane-mediated signaling.
Although the mechanisms are as not yet determined, there is mounting evidence that the expression or function of ERα in the hippocampus is selectively decreased during aging. In rats, aged females had a 50% reduction in the number of synapses in CA1 of the hippocampus that contained ERα immunoreactivity as compared to young females and the ERα levels were responsive to estradiol treatment in young, but not old rats . Like ERα, ERβ levels were found to be significantly decreased in the hippocampus of old versus young female rats , , but in contrast to ERα, ERβ levels remained responsive to estradiol treatment in aged rats . Furthermore, aged female mice exhibited significantly decreased levels of ERα interaction with β-tubulin, a microtubule-associated protein involved in estrogen signaling, as compared to young mice . Interestingly, in Alzheimer’s disease patients, levels of ERα, but not ERβ in the frontal cortex are correlated with cognitive function . Finally, in women polymorphisms of ERα are associated with increased risk of age-related cognitive decline , . Taken together, results point to a decrease in levels or function of ERα in the etiology of age-associated cognitive decline and neurodegenerative disease.
A decline in ERα expression or function may mediate the “critical period” of estrogen effects . The critical period hypothesis proposes that there is a time window following cessation of ovarian function during which estrogen administration must be initiated in order for it to exert positive effects on the brain , . Evidence for the hypothesis includes the finding that long-term hormone deprivation attenuates or blocks the enhancing effects of estradiol on hippocampal , ,  and prefrontal cortex  dependent behavior, cholinergic function ,  and long-term potentiation . Additionally, estradiol administration begun at the time of ovariectomy, but not after a long-term period of hormone deprivation, reverses an ovariectomy-induced decrease in hippocampal levels of ERα . Following long-term ovarian hormone deprivation, ERα in rat hippocampus increasingly interacts with the C-terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein, or CHIP, resulting in its ubiquitination/proteasomal degradation . However, estradiol treatment initiated during a critical period following ovariectomy prevented this enhanced ERα-CHIP interaction and subsequent ERα degradation. The current data suggest that prevention of ERα degradation in the critical period following loss of ovarian function may provide cognitive benefits even in the absence of continued estradiol treatment.
In conclusion, these data demonstrate that increasing levels of ERα in the hippocampus following the cessation of ovarian function enhances hippocampus-dependent memory and increases phosphorylation of ERK/MAPK. Further, they represent the first demonstration that estrogen receptor can impact the hippocampus and cognition in aging females in the absence of ovarian steroids or exogenously administered estrogens. The current data add to a growing body of evidence that changes in levels of ERα that occur following the cessation of ovarian function in the aging female contribute to age-related cognitive decline.
The authors thank Linda Bean for histology and imaging assistance and Michael Mainguy and Preya Jhita for help in behavioral training and testing.
Conceived and designed the experiments: CFW TCF SLSR JMD. Performed the experiments: CFW TCF SLSR JMD. Analyzed the data: CFW TCF SLSR JMD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CFW TCF SLSR JMD. Wrote the paper: CFW TCF SLSR JMD.
- 1. Luine VN (2008) Sex steroids and cognitive function. J Neuroendocrinol 20: 866–872. JNE1710 [pii];10.1111/j.1365–2826.2008.01710.x [doi].
- 2. Daniel JM (2006) Effects of oestrogen on cognition: what have we learned from basic research? J Neuroendocrinol 18: 787–795. JNE1471 [pii];10.1111/j.1365–2826.2006.01471.x [doi].
- 3. Dohanich GP, Korol DL, Shors TJ (2009) Steroids, learning and memory. In: Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Fahrbach SE, Etgen AM, Rubin RT, editors. Hormones, Brain and Behavior. San Diego: Academic Press. 539–576.
- 4. McEwen BS, Alves SE (1999) Estrogen actions in the central nervous system. Endocr Rev 20: 279–307.
- 5. Miller NR, Jover T, Cohen HW, Zukin RS, Etgen AM (2005) Estrogen can act via estrogen receptor alpha and beta to protect hippocampal neurons against global ischemia-induced cell death. Endocrinology 146: 3070–3079. en.2004–1515 [pii];10.1210/en.2004–1515 [doi].
- 6. Weiland NG, Orikasa C, Hayashi S, McEwen BS (1997) AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2–6 [pii].
- 7. Shughrue PJ, Lane MV, Merchenthaler I (1997) AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2–6 [pii].
- 8. Perez SE, Chen EY, Mufson EJ (2003) Distribution of estrogen receptor alpha and beta immunoreactive profiles in the postnatal rat brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 145: 117–139. S0165380603002232 [pii].
- 9. Towart LA, Alves SE, Znamensky V, Hayashi S, McEwen BS et al. (2003) Subcellular relationships between cholinergic terminals and estrogen receptor-alpha in the dorsal hippocampus. J Comp Neurol 463: 390–401. 10.1002/cne.10753 [doi].
- 10. Hall JM, Couse JF, Korach KS (2001) The multifaceted mechanisms of estradiol and estrogen receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 276: 36869–36872. 10.1074/jbc.R100029200 [doi];R100029200 [pii].
- 11. Zhao L, Brinton RD (2007) Estrogen receptor alpha and beta differentially regulate intracellular Ca(2+) dynamics leading to ERK phosphorylation and estrogen neuroprotection in hippocampal neurons. Brain Res 1172: 48–59. S0006-8993(07)01430-8 [pii];10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.092 [doi].
- 12. Spencer-Segal JL, Tsuda MC, Mattei L, Waters EM, Romeo RD et al. (2012) Estradiol acts via estrogen receptors alpha and beta on pathways important for synaptic plasticity in the mouse hippocampal formation. Neuroscience 202: 131–146. S0306-4522(11)01307-8 [pii];10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.11.035 [doi].
- 13. Daniel JM (2012) Estrogens, estrogen receptors, and female cognitive aging: The impact of timing. Horm Behav. S0018-506X(12)00144-4 [pii];10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.05.003 [doi].
- 14. Foster TC (2011) Role of estrogen receptor alpha and beta expression and signaling on cognitive function during aging. Hippocampus. 10.1002/hipo.20935 [doi].
- 15. Yaffe K, Lindquist K, Sen S, Cauley J, Ferrell R et al. (2009) Estrogen receptor genotype and risk of cognitive impairment in elders: findings from the Health ABC study. Neurobiol Aging 30: 607–614. S0197-4580(07)00334-X [pii];10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.08.003 [doi].
- 16. Yaffe K, Lui LY, Grady D, Stone K, Morin P (2002) Estrogen receptor 1 polymorphisms and risk of cognitive impairment in older women. Biol Psychiatry 51: 677–682. S0006322301012896 [pii].
- 17. Kelly JF, Bienias JL, Shah A, Meeke KA, Schneider JA, et al. (2008) Levels of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in frontal cortex of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: relationship to Mini-Mental State Examination scores. Curr Alzheimer Res 5: 45–51.
- 18. Rodgers SP, Bohacek J, Daniel JM (2010) Transient estradiol exposure during middle age in ovariectomized rats exerts lasting effects on cognitive function and the hippocampus. Endocrinology 151: 1194–1203. en.2009-1245 [pii];10.1210/en.2009-1245 [doi].
- 19. Bora SH, Liu Z, Kecojevic A, Merchenthaler I, Koliatsos VE (2005) Direct, complex effects of estrogens on basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. Exp Neurol 194: 506–522. S0014-4886(05)00114-7 [pii];10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.03.015 [doi].
- 20. Hyder SM, Chiappetta C, Stancel GM (1999) Interaction of human estrogen receptors alpha and beta with the same naturally occurring estrogen response elements. Biochem Pharmacol 57: 597–601. S0006-2952(98)00355-4 [pii].
- 21. Foster TC, Rani A, Kumar A, Cui L, Semple-Rowland SL (2008) Viral vector-mediated delivery of estrogen receptor-alpha to the hippocampus improves spatial learning in estrogen receptor-alpha knockout mice. Mol Ther 16: 1587–1593. mt2008140 [pii];10.1038/mt.2008.140 [doi].
- 22. Hall JM, McDonnell DP (1999) The estrogen receptor beta-isoform (ERbeta) of the human estrogen receptor modulates ERalpha transcriptional activity and is a key regulator of the cellular response to estrogens and antiestrogens. Endocrinology 140: 5566–5578.
- 23. Matthews J, Wihlen B, Tujague M, Wan J, Strom A et al. (2006) Estrogen receptor (ER) beta modulates ERalpha-mediated transcriptional activation by altering the recruitment of c-Fos and c-Jun to estrogen-responsive promoters. Mol Endocrinol 20: 534–543. me.2005-0140 [pii];10.1210/me.2005-0140 [doi].
- 24. Coleman JE, Huentelman MJ, Kasparov S, Metcalfe BL, Paton JF et al. (2003) Efficient large-scale production and concentration of HIV-1-based lentiviral vectors for use in vivo. Physiol Genomics 12: 221–228. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00135.2002 [doi];00135.2002 [pii].
- 25. Pawluski JL, Galea LA (2006) Hippocampal morphology is differentially affected by reproductive experience in the mother. J Neurobiol 66: 71–81. 10.1002/neu.20194 [doi].
- 26. Pawluski JL, Walker SK, Galea LA (2006) Reproductive experience differentially affects spatial reference and working memory performance in the mother. Horm Behav 49: 143–149. S0018-506X(05)00139-X [pii];10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.05.016 [doi].
- 27. Semple-Rowland SL, Coggin WE, Geesey M, Eccles KS, Abraham L et al. (2010) Expression characteristics of dual-promoter lentiviral vectors targeting retinal photoreceptors and Muller cells. Mol Vis 16: 916–934. 102 [pii].
- 28. Paxinos G, Watson C (1998) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic.
- 29. Bimonte HA, Denenberg VH (1999) Estradiol facilitates performance as working memory load increases. Psychoneuroendocrinology 24: 161–173. S0306-4530(98)00068-7 [pii].
- 30. Chrobak JJ, Hanin I, Lorens SA, Napier TC (1995) Within-subject decline in delayed-non-match-to-sample radial arm maze performance in aging Sprague-Dawley rats. Behav Neurosci 109: 241–245.
- 31. Bohacek J, Daniel JM (2009) The ability of oestradiol administration to regulate protein levels of oestrogen receptor alpha in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of middle-aged rats is altered following long-term ovarian hormone deprivation. J Neuroendocrinol 21: 640–647. JNE1882 [pii];10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01882.x [doi].
- 32. Daniel JM, Dohanich GP (2001) Acetylcholine mediates the estrogen-induced increase in NMDA receptor binding in CA1 of the hippocampus and the associated improvement in working memory. J Neurosci 21: 6949–6956. 21/17/6949 [pii].
- 33. Luine VN, Richards ST, Wu VY, Beck KD (1998) Estradiol enhances learning and memory in a spatial memory task and effects levels of monoaminergic neurotransmitters. Horm Behav 34: 149–162. S0018-506X(98)91473-8 [pii];10.1006/hbeh.1998.1473 [doi].
- 34. Daniel JM, Hulst JL, Berbling JL (2006) Estradiol replacement enhances working memory in middle-aged rats when initiated immediately after ovariectomy but not after a long-term period of ovarian hormone deprivation. Endocrinology 147: 607–614. en.2005-0998 [pii];10.1210/en.2005-0998 [doi].
- 35. Daniel JM, Bohacek J (2010) The critical period hypothesis of estrogen effects on cognition: Insights from basic research. Biochim Biophys Acta 1800: 1068–1076. S0304-4165(10)00012-7 [pii];10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.01.007 [doi].
- 36. Bimonte-Nelson HA, Acosta JI, Talboom JS (2010) Neuroscientists as cartographers: mapping the crossroads of gonadal hormones, memory and age using animal models. Molecules 15: 6050–6105. 15096050 [pii];10.3390/molecules15096050 [doi].
- 37. Korol DL (2004) Role of estrogen in balancing contributions from multiple memory systems. Neurobiol Learn Mem 82: 309–323. S1074-7427(04)00094-2 [pii];10.1016/j.nlm.2004.07.006 [doi].
- 38. Mukai H, Kimoto T, Hojo Y, Kawato S, Murakami G et al. (2010) Modulation of synaptic plasticity by brain estrogen in the hippocampus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1800: 1030–1044. S0304-4165(09)00298-0 [pii];10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.11.002 [doi].
- 39. Ooishi Y, Kawato S, Hojo Y, Hatanaka Y, Higo S et al. (2011) Modulation of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus by hippocampus-derived estrogen and androgen. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. S0960-0760(11)00214-7 [pii];10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.10.004 [doi].
- 40. Kretz O, Fester L, Wehrenberg U, Zhou L, Brauckmann S et al. (2004) Hippocampal synapses depend on hippocampal estrogen synthesis. J Neurosci 24: 5913–5921. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5186-03.2004 [doi];24/26/5913 [pii].
- 41. Zhou L, Lehan N, Wehrenberg U, Disteldorf E, von Lossow R et al. (2007) Neuroprotection by estradiol: a role of aromatase against spine synapse loss after blockade of GABA(A) receptors. Exp Neurol 203: 72–81. S0014-4886(06)00439-0 [pii];10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.07.020 [doi].
- 42. Kato S, Endoh H, Masuhiro Y, Kitamoto T, Uchiyama S, et al. (1995) Activation of the estrogen receptor through phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinase. Science 270: 1491–1494.
- 43. Smith CL (1998) Cross-talk between peptide growth factor and estrogen receptor signaling pathways. Biol Reprod 58: 627–632.
- 44. Wu TW, Chen S, Brinton RD (2011) Membrane estrogen receptors mediate calcium signaling and MAP kinase activation in individual hippocampal neurons. Brain Res 1379: 34–43. S0006-8993(11)00095-3 [pii];10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.034 [doi].
- 45. Ogiue-Ikeda M, Tanabe N, Mukai H, Hojo Y, Murakami G et al. (2008) Rapid modulation of synaptic plasticity by estrogens as well as endocrine disrupters in hippocampal neurons. Brain Res Rev 57: 363–375. S0165-0173(07)00110-5 [pii];10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.010 [doi].
- 46. Fan L, Zhao Z, Orr PT, Chambers CH, Lewis MC et al. (2010) Estradiol-induced object memory consolidation in middle-aged female mice requires dorsal hippocampal extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation. J Neurosci 30: 4390–4400. 30/12/4390 [pii];10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4333-09.2010 [doi].
- 47. Paxinos G (1995) The rat nervous system. San Diego: Academic.
- 48. Adams MM, Fink SE, Shah RA, Janssen WG, Hayashi S et al. (2002) Estrogen and aging affect the subcellular distribution of estrogen receptor-alpha in the hippocampus of female rats. J Neurosci 22: 3608–3614. 20026275 [doi];22/9/3608 [pii].
- 49. Waters EM, Yildirim M, Janssen WG, Lou WY, McEwen BS et al. (2011) Estrogen and aging affect the synaptic distribution of estrogen receptor beta-immunoreactivity in the CA1 region of female rat hippocampus. Brain Res 1379: 86–97. S0006-8993(10)02135-9 [pii];10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.069 [doi].
- 50. Mehra RD, Sharma K, Nyakas C, Vij U (2005) Estrogen receptor alpha and beta immunoreactive neurons in normal adult and aged female rat hippocampus: a qualitative and quantitative study. Brain Res 1056: 22–35. S0006-8993(05)01001-2 [pii];10.1016/j.brainres.2005.06.073 [doi].
- 51. Ghosh S, Thakur MK (2009) Age-dependent decrease in the interaction of beta-tubulin with estrogen receptor alpha transactivation domain in mouse brain. Neurosci Lett 464: 218–221. S0304-3940(09)01147-1 [pii];10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.054 [doi].
- 52. Resnick SM, Henderson VW (2002) Hormone therapy and risk of Alzheimer disease: a critical time. JAMA 288: 2170–2172. jed20062 [pii].
- 53. Maki PM, Dennerstein L, Clark M, Guthrie J, Lamontagne P et al. (2011) Perimenopausal use of hormone therapy is associated with enhanced memory and hippocampal function later in life. Brain Res 1379: 232–243. S0006-8993(10)02543-6 [pii];10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.030 [doi].
- 54. Gibbs RB (2000) Long-term treatment with estrogen and progesterone enhances acquisition of a spatial memory task by ovariectomized aged rats. Neurobiol Aging 21: 107–116. S0197-4580(00)00103-2 [pii].
- 55. Foster TC, Sharrow KM, Kumar A, Masse J (2003) Interaction of age and chronic estradiol replacement on memory and markers of brain aging. Neurobiol Aging 24: 839–852. S0197458003000149 [pii].
- 56. Bohacek J, Daniel JM (2010) The beneficial effects of estradiol on attentional processes are dependent on timing of treatment initiation following ovariectomy in middle-aged rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35: 694–705. S0306-4530(09)00319-9 [pii];10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.010 [doi].
- 57. Bohacek J, Bearl AM, Daniel JM (2008) Long-term ovarian hormone deprivation alters the ability of subsequent oestradiol replacement to regulate choline acetyltransferase protein levels in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of middle-aged rats. J Neuroendocrinol 20: 1023–1027. JNE1752 [pii];10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01752.x [doi].
- 58. Gibbs RB, Mauk R, Nelson D, Johnson DA (2009) Donepezil treatment restores the ability of estradiol to enhance cognitive performance in aged rats: evidence for the cholinergic basis of the critical period hypothesis. Horm Behav 56: 73–83. S0018-506X(09)00056-7 [pii];10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.03.003 [doi].
- 59. Smith CC, Vedder LC, Nelson AR, Bredemann TM, McMahon LL (2010) Duration of estrogen deprivation, not chronological age, prevents estrogen’s ability to enhance hippocampal synaptic physiology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 19543–19548. 1009307107 [pii];10.1073/pnas.1009307107 [doi].
- 60. Zhang QG, Han D, Wang RM, Dong Y, Yang F et al. (2011) C terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein (CHIP)-mediated degradation of hippocampal estrogen receptor-alpha and the critical period hypothesis of estrogen neuroprotection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: E617-E624. 1104391108 [pii];10.1073/pnas.1104391108 [doi].