Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The Effects of Seed Size on Hybrids Formed between Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus) and Wild Brown Mustard (B. juncea)

  • Yong-bo Liu,

    Affiliations State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, UMR1347 Agroécologie, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Dijon, France, State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Zhi-xi Tang,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Henri Darmency,

    Affiliation UMR1347 Agroécologie, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Dijon, France

  • C. Neal Stewart Jr.,

    Affiliation Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America

  • Kun Di,

    Affiliations State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korler, Xinjiang, China

  • Wei Wei ,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Ke-ping Ma

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

The Effects of Seed Size on Hybrids Formed between Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus) and Wild Brown Mustard (B. juncea)

  • Yong-bo Liu, 
  • Zhi-xi Tang, 
  • Henri Darmency, 
  • C. Neal Stewart Jr., 
  • Kun Di, 
  • Wei Wei, 
  • Ke-ping Ma



Seed size has significant implications in ecology, because of its effects on plant fitness. The hybrid seeds that result from crosses between crops and their wild relatives are often small, and the consequences of this have been poorly investigated. Here we report on plant performance of hybrid and its parental transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild B. juncea, all grown from seeds sorted into three seed-size categories.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Three seed-size categories were sorted by seed diameter for transgenic B. napus, wild B. juncea and their transgenic and non-transgenic hybrids. The seeds were sown in a field at various plant densities. Globally, small-seeded plants had delayed flowering, lower biomass, fewer flowers and seeds, and a lower thousand-seed weight. The seed-size effect varied among plant types but was not affected by plant density. There was no negative effect of seed size in hybrids, but it was correlated with reduced growth for both parents.


Our results imply that the risk of further gene flow would probably not be mitigated by the small size of transgenic hybrid seeds. No fitness cost was detected to be associated with the Bt-transgene in this study.


Transgene flow from crops to their wild relatives is a potential risk associated with commercial release of transgenic crops [1]. A review by Ellstrand et al. notes that 12 out of the world's 13 most important crops could hybridize with wild relatives. This suggests that transgenes could escape via spontaneous hybridization with and introgression to wild relatives [2], though the risk has to be assessed according to crop characteristics and mitigation strategies [3]. Escape of transgenes into wild populations could potentially enhance the invasiveness of weeds, because transgenes provide adaptive traits such as resistance to pests, herbicides, viruses and other diseases, and various environmental stresses [4]. Hybrid transgenic progeny have been observed both within and outside of agro-ecosystems, such as in fields, their margins and roadsides [5], [6].

The fate of hybrids will have a crucial effect on gene flow and the potential for subsequent introgression of transgenes into wild and weedy hosts. Seed formation may be the first important phase of hybrid development, because parental differences in chromosome numbers and certain traits could negatively affect embryo development. For instance, studies of interspecific hybridization between oilseed rape (OSR, Brassica napus) as female and its wild relatives as pollen donors have shown that hybrid seeds are all small relative to either parent when hybridizing with Hirschfeldia incana [7], [8], Raphanus raphanistrum [7], [8] and B. juncea [9] but partially small with B. rapa [10]. Wei and Darmency later confirmed that all hybrid seeds produced by a male-sterile OSR cultivar and four wild species were within the smallest size class, except the hybrids formed with B. rapa, for which hybrids seeds were equally distributed among all seed-size classes [11]. The small size of hybrid seeds that being smaller than either parent could explain the absence of recorded hybrids–other than B. napus×B. rapa hybrids [11]–because small seeds purportedly confer a fitness disadvantage due to negative effects on emergence, initial seedling size, and early competitive ability [12], [13]. Decreased fitness in small-seeded plants could then be exacerbated under stressful conditions such as high density, shade, drought, or herbivory [14], [15]. Thus, hypothetically, gene flow could be hampered by small sized seeds in hybrids between transgenic crops and wild relatives [11]. However, the negative effect of hybrid seed size was only observed in the field at the early stage of seedling establishment, and plant growth was evaluated without accounting for seed production and competition among plants of different seed sizes. Since seed size is an important factor in ecology [16] that can affect the process and consequences of gene flow, we investigate here whether plants grown from small seeds do indeed have a reduced competitive ability compared to plants grown from larger seeds.

Oilseed rape is considered to be a crop at high risk for introgression into wild populations [3]. B. juncea, an allotetraploid wild relative species, is frequently found as a weed and a ruderal component of roadsides and waste places in China. Open pollination experiments have successfully generated hybrids and subsequent backcross generations between B. napus and wild B. juncea [9], [17], [18]. Transgene introgression is a biosafety concern because of the relatively high compatibility between B. napus and wild B. juncea. Therefore, we wonder whether B. juncea×B. napus crosses actually produce small hybrid seeds, comparing to their parents, and, if so, does small seed size impact the fate of hybrids compared to either volunteer and feral B. napus or wild B. juncea, and thus reduces gene flow in nature? In this study, we focus on seed-size components of plant growth and reproduction in the agro-ecosystem and on the interaction between seed size and transgene introgression. The objectives of this study were to investigate 1) whether there is any effect of seed size on plant growth and reproduction; if so, 2) whether the effects vary with plant type and plant density and 3) whether the exotic gene (transgene) modifies these effects; and to discuss 4) whether small-seeded hybrids impede further gene flow, considering seed survival in the field and potential change of both fertility and seed size in further generation. In our study, the hybrid seeds have been produced using wild plants as female parent, which could indicate what might happen in the wild (outside the arable fields), as well as in weedy populations (within the fields, in competition against oilseed rape). In contrast to most documented cases, in which seed size is expected to be intermediate between the two parents, the hybrids seeds here are smaller than those of either parent; plant performance and seed production of hybrids in the field could be outside the parental range. The experiments were performed under various conditions of plant competition at different levels of plant density.

Materials and Methods


Seeds of wild brown mustard (Brassica juncea, 2n = 36, AABB), sampled from a local field collection, were provided by Nanjing Agricultural University, China. Brassica napus cv. “Westar” (OSR, 2n = 38, AACC), a spring-type OSR, was transformed with the pSAM 12 plasmid containing genetically linked GFP and Bt Cry1Ac cassettes regulated by independent CaMV 35S promoters [21]. The third generation of transgenic plants generated from the homogenous T2 transgenic event 1 (GT1) was bulked in the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IBCAS) to obtain the fourth generation, which allowed sufficient seeds and plants with stable expression of Bt and GFP genes. Transgenic F1 hybrids (trF1) were formed between wild mustard (as female) and the fourth generation of GT1. Non-transgenic F1 hybrids (ntrF1) were obtained by crossing wild mustard (used as the female parent) with the non-transgenic OSR parent (Westar). Both hybridization experiments used ten paternal and maternal plants.

The GT seeds were sieved into three categories by seed diameter: larger than 1.6 mm (L), smaller than 1.2 mm (S), and intermediate between 1.2 and 1.6 mm (M). These categories were the same as those used in previous studies on the hybridization of B. napus with five wild relatives [11] and resulted in balanced classes around the M category, which contained nearly half the seeds (Table 1). Seeds of wild mustard were smaller, thus 1.2 mm and 1.0 mm sieves were used for the seed-size classification, which again resulted in balanced classes around the main M category (Table 1). Most hybrid trF1 and ntrF1 seeds were smaller than 1.2 mm and were sorted into four size categories. However, the smallest seeds had little-to-no germination in preliminary research [19], so the distribution of the seeds used in this study was shifted upwards in category, and sieved by 0.9 and 1.0 mm (Table 1). Plants derived from the three seed-size categories were subsequently labelled as small-seeded plants (SSP), medium-seeded plants (MSP) and large-seeded plants (LSP) in the following experiments.

Table 1. Distribution of seed-size categories for the four plant types (modified from reference [19]).

Monoculture experiment

The three seed categories of B. juncea (mustard) were sown in the experimental field of the botanical garden of IBCAS on March 19, 2008. The experimental design consisted of three blocks, each having three plots with a different plant density: 400 plants/m2 (high), 100 plants/m2 (medium) and 25 plants/m2 (low) (Fig. S1). Each plot had 60 sowing positions at the intersections of 5 rows and 12 columns arranged in three distances: 5 cm, 10 cm and 20 cm, for the high, medium and low densities, respectively. Ten centre positions and ten edge positions in each plot were randomly assigned to each seed category and each position was sown with five seeds. So, for example, small seeds of mustard were sown in 10 randomly-selected positions in the center of each plot and in 10 randomly-selected positions on the edge. Emerged seedlings were counted, and then randomly thinned to one plant per position.

Multi-culture experiment

In order to study interspecific competition, the four types of plants–mustard, GT, trF1, and ntrF1–were co-cultivated together. Seeds from each of the three size categories were directly sown in the field on March 31, 2008. There were three blocks in this experiment and each block contained two plots at two plant densities: 100 plants/m2 and 25 plants/m2, i.e. the distance between plants at these two densities was 10 cm and 20 cm, respectively (Fig. S1). Five seeds of each seed category for each plant type were sown at 10 randomly-selected positions in each plot. In total, there were 120 positions for three seed categories of four plant types, sown in 10 rows and 12 columns per plot. The number of emerged seedlings were recorded, and then randomly thinned to one plant per position, as in the monoculture trial above.


These two experiments were kept weed-free by hand weeding, and every plant was labelled. Field management of the plants was identical to normal OSR cultivation, and included five pesticide treatments applied during the growth season. The weather was within normal regional ranges during the experiments. Open pollination was permitted during the flowering period.

The following variables were measured for every plant in both experiments (unless otherwise noted): the number of days from sowing to flowering; number of flowers (in the monoculture trial only), seed number, seed weight, and total dried aboveground biomass. Thousand-seed weight was calculated for each plant. Reproductive allocation was estimated as seed production per unit biomass (seed weight/biomass). The harvested seeds produced by each plant were sieved into three categories by seed diameter, as described above, and the number and total weight of seeds in each seed category were measured. The percentage of seeds in each of the three seed categories set on each individual plant was calculated.

Statistical analysis

In order to prevent border effects, only plants in plot centres were included (i.e.10 plants per category for monoculture, and a mean number of 6.7 per category for the multi-culture experiment), and averages per block were used for statistical analyses. A three-way fixed split-plot ANOVA model was used for the monoculture experiment, which included plant density (D) as the main plot tested against the density:block interaction (D:B), seed size (S), block (B) and density:seed size interaction (D:S) (Y∼D* S+B+D:B in R language). A four-way fixed split-plot ANOVA model (Y∼D* S* P+B+D:B) was used for the multi-culture experiment, which included density as main plot, seed size, block and plant type effects (P), D:S, D:P, S:P and D:S:P interactions. In these two models, the mean square of D:B was used as the error of D to calculate its F-value, because the density was split into plots in each block while other factors were randomly distributed within each plot. All data were log-transformed to improve the normality of errors and homogeneity of variance. The split-plot ANOVA results, including the main effect of each factor and their interaction, are provided in supplementary Tables S1 and S2. When there were significant interactions among factors (D, S, P), the related variables were analysed using Bonferroni corrected pair-wise comparisons and Tukey's honestly significant difference (Tukey's HSD) test. All statistical analyses were conducted in R software version 2.13.1 [20].


Monoculture experiment

Effects of plant density: Plant density significantly affected the performance of mustard plants; increased density decreased the number of flowers, biomass, and seed number and weight, and increased the percentage of large and medium seeds (Tables 2 and Table S1, Fig. 1). Flowering time, reproductive allocation and thousand-seed weight were not affected by plant density.

Figure 1. Four plant growth characteristics of the three seed-size categories of wild Brassica juncea at three plant densities in the monoculture experiment.

Each group of bars represents plants derived from three seed-size categories for a given plant density. Significant effects of seed size were observed for the four traits. Effects of density were observed for flowering date and seed number only.

Table 2. Means (±SE) of growth characteristics of the mustard plants in the monoculture experiment at three densities and for plants derived from three seed-size categories: LSP, MSP and SSP for large-, medium- and small-seeded plants, respectively.

Effects of seed size: Seed-size category affected all traits except the emergence rate and the reproductive allocation (Tables 2 and Table S1, Fig. 1). LSP flowered earlier than SSP by an average of 4 days, and produced 89% more flowers, 53% more biomass, 41% more seeds, 70% higher seed weight and had more large seeds but fewer small seeds. Thousand-seed weight in LSP was 13% greater than that in SSP (Table 2 and Table S1). There was no interaction between density and seed size for emergence rate, biomass, seed number and weight (Table S1). In all seed-size classes, there was a strong positive correlation between number of flowers, biomass, seed number and seed weight (P<0.001), and the percentage of small seeds was negatively correlated with the percentage of large seeds (P<0.001). Thousand-seed weight was positively correlated (P<0.01) with these same four traits–number of flowers, biomass, seed number and seed weight–for LSP and MSP, but there was no correlation for SSP.

Multi-culture experiment

Effect of plant density and seed size: Increased plant density reduced biomass, and seed number and weight. The other traits were not affected (Tables 3 and Table S2). The significant effect on the emergence rate was due to important block and main plot bias; GT values were 0.35 at the low density and 0.68 at the high density. This bias had no influence on subsequent measurements, because only one seedling was left at each position. SSP had significantly delayed flowering (by two days), lower biomass, lower seed number and weight, and lower thousand-seed weight than LSP (Table 3 and Table S2). There was no interaction between density and seed size for any measured characteristics (Table S2), indicating that seed-size effects persisted at all densities. Interactions between density and plant type and between seed size and plant type were observed, and are described below. There were no interactions between plant density, seed size, or plant type and any of the measured plant growth characteristics (Table S2).

Table 3. Means (±SE) of growth characteristics of plants in the multi-culture experiment at two densities and for plants derived from three seed-size categories: LSP, MSP and SSP for large, medium and small-seeded plants, respectively.

Performance of the four plant types: All measured growth characteristics differed among the four plant types: GT, trF1, ntrF1 and mustard (Tables 4 and Table S2, Fig. 2 and 3). Wild mustard flowered earliest, then ntrF1 and finally trF1 and GT. We observed transgressive segregation, as the hybrids (trF1 and ntrF1) produced greater biomass, fewer seeds, and lower seed weight and reproductive allocation than both parents. As expected, mustard plants had the lowest biomass and greatest reproductive allocation, and GT plants had the highest seed number and seed weight (Table 3). The thousand-seed weight of both hybrids, trF1 and ntrF1, was intermediate to that of the wild and GT parents. The distribution of the three seed-size categories in harvested seeds shifted toward larger seeds for the GT parent (53%) and the trF1 and ntrF1 hybrids (78 and 73%), while it shifted toward smaller seeds for the wild parent (91%) (Table 4). We also found differences between the two hybrids: trF1 plants flowered later and had higher seed weight and greater reproductive allocation than the ntrF1 plants (Table 3). Traits were correlated in the same way as in the monoculture experiment, e.g. seed number and seed weight were positively correlated (P<0.001), except that thousand-seed weight was not correlated to biomass, seed number and weight in GT, trF1 and ntrF1. Thousand-seed weight was significantly correlated with these three variables (at least P<0.02) for mustard grown from all three initial seed categories.

Figure 2. Four plant growth characteristics of the four plant types–transgenic B. napus (GT), transgenic F1 (trF1), non-transgenic F1 (ntrF1) and wild B. juncea (wild)–at high density (black bar) and low density (white bar) in the multi-culture experiment.

Different letters indicate significantly different values, evaluated using Tukey's HSD test at P<0.05.

Figure 3. Four plant growth characteristics of the four plant types–transgenic B. napus (GT), transgenic F1 (trF1), non-transgenic F1 (ntrF1) and wild B. juncea (wild)–for three seed categories (large, medium and small in black, white and grey, respectively) in the multi-culture experiment.

Significant effects were observed for seed number and biomass only. Different letters indicate significantly different values, evaluated using Tukey's HSD test at P<0.05.

Table 4. Means (±SE) of plant growth characteristics for the four plant types used in the multi-culture experiment.

Interactions among plant density, plant type and seed size: GT and hybrids flowered later in the high density plots than in low density plots, in contrast to the mustard, which was not affected by density (Fig. 2, Table S2). Seed number and seed weight of mustard were greatly reduced at the high density, but not for the other plant types (Fig. 2). At the high density, thousand-seed weight was slightly reduced for mustard, increased for the OSR GT, and unaffected in the hybrids; however, this effect was weak after Bonferroni adjustment (Fig. 2). Finally, SSP GT parents had markedly lower biomass and seed production than LSP GT parents, but there was no significant difference in these variables for different seed sizes of hybrids or mustard (Fig. 3).


In the B. juncea monoculture experiment, the flowering time, biomass, number of flowers and seeds, and thousand-seed weight of wild mustard were affected by the seed-size category from which the plants were grown. A similar result was observed in the multi-culture experiment for all four plant types, which suggests that seed size is an important determinant of plant fitness. This is consistent with findings in other studies. For instance, in R. raphanistrum, larger seeds generally produce larger plants with more flowers than those that originated from smaller seeds [22], [23]. The earlier flowering seen in larger seeded plants in both of our experiments might have resulted from earlier emergence, as noted by Harper [24], although we did not record emergence date in our study. It is generally thought that seed mass has a significant influence on seedling emergence and initial plant development both within species or varieties [11], [12], [25], [26] and among species [13], [27]. After the early seedling stage, plant growth and development rates are similar regardless of seed size, as the principal energy sources become photosynthates from emerged leaves [12], [23], [28]; this means that initial differences related to seed size could be compensated at later growth stage. Indeed, reproductive allocation was not significantly differentiated among all densities and seed sizes in this study.

In our multi-culture experiment, the seed-size effect was mainly driven by the B. napus response and plants originated from smaller seeds tended to have decreased seed production. Though it followed the same trend as in the monoculture experiment, the initial seed-size effect was not significant for B. juncea in the multi-culture experiment. A previous study [11] suggested that seed-size effects were predominant at the early stage of seedling establishment, with very little seed-size effect afterward. In our study, for the most part, plants were thinned to leave only the biggest, healthiest seedling per position, thus hiding part of the early differential effect of seed size. Although it is often the case that small-seeded plants were more vulnerable to environmental stress than larger-seeded plants [29], seed-size effects on plant fitness could be balanced by plant types and environmental stresses, such as high plant density and herbivory [12], [23], [28]. For instance, a seed-size effect was observed in a direct sowing experiment but not in a transplant experiment [11]. The authors suggested that the homogeneous environment in the greenhouse prior to transplantation into the field had compensated for the small seed disadvantage at the early growth stage. Another study reported an interaction of plant density on the influence of seed size on plant growth and reproduction [14]. In our study, the lack of density*seed size interaction in both experiments showed that the performance of small-seeded plants was not density-dependent within the 25 to 400 plants/m−2 range of our experiments–a density range that is quite representative of plant densities occurring in oilseed rape fields (including the crop and any other weeds). However, it is not possible to extrapolate this result to roadsides and waste places where established vegetation could affect seedling emergence and growth, especially for small seeded plants.

Seed size significantly affected the performances of transgenic oilseed rape, but it did not impact any growth components measured in the transgenic F1 plants. Although the average seed size of hybrids was markedly smaller than that of either parent, they produced a significantly greater proportion of large seeds (diameter>1.0 mm). Therefore, even if seed size had an actual impact on fitness, this negative effect might disappear in further generations.

Hybrids had dramatically decreased fertility– seven-fold less than their parents–as already shown in most B. napus hybridization studies [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], but have produced more biomass than either parent, potentially owing to their reduced relative reproductive allocation. However, the fertility could be recovered in subsequent generations [1], [4], [17]. This suggested that hybrid plants could only have disadvantage at earlier steps of introgression.

Small seeds are more easily sieved out by mechanical harvesters and dispersed through wind and animals than large seeds; large seeds would likely be collected together with the crop seeds at harvest. Survival of small seeds could be higher than that of larger seeds in conventional tillage systems and arable habitats, thus creating a potential persistence problem [30]. Hence, small-size seeds produced by hybridization might represent one crucial risk of transgene escape in the field.

We compared two hybrid types in the multi-culture experiments. Performance of small-seeded transgenic F1 hybrids was equivalent to that of plants from large seeds. There were no significant differences between transgenic F1 and non-transgenic F1 plants in seed output, which indicates an absence of transgene-associated fitness costs [31]. A fitness cost of transgene expression has been associated with herbivore resistance in some studies [32], [33], but this cost has not been observed in transgenic B. napus and sunflower [31], [34], [35]. The greater overall seed weight and reproductive allocation that we observed in transgenic F1 plants were due to the slight increase in both seed number and thousand-seed weight, which suggests that development may have been enhanced in transgenic hybrids. Bt resistance might have provided better plant protection against insects during the time periods between pesticide treatments. Certainly, the relative performance of the two hybrids and their wild parent would have shifted under high insect pressure, as observed elsewhere [36], [37], which could suggest that the benefit due to the transgene is likely to be much more important than any possible seed-size effect. If this is true, small seed size could not reduce the risk of gene flow from transgenic crops to wild relatives.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Experimental designs, showing one representative block of monoculture (A) and multi-culture (B) experiments. Different sizes of plots indicate different plant densities (main plots). Three seed categories and plant types were sown randomly in 60 (A) and 120 (B) plant positions in each main plot.


Table S1.

F-values from a split-plot ANOVA on the plant growth characteristics of wild mustard in the monoculture experiment.


Table S2.

F-values from a split-plot ANOVA on the plant growth characteristics of transgenic hybrid, non- transgenic hybrid, wild mustard and transgenic oilseed rape in the multi-culture experiment.



The field experiment using transgenic material was approved by the Ministry of Agriculture of China.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WW HD ZT KM. Performed the experiments: ZT WW KD. Analyzed the data: YL ZT WW KD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CNS. Wrote the paper: YL HD CNS WW KM.


  1. 1. Pilson D, Prendeville HR (2004) Ecological effects of transgenic crops and the escape of transgenes into wild populations. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 149–174.
  2. 2. Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 30: 539–563.
  3. 3. Stewart CN Jr, Halfhill MD, Warwick SI (2003) Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 806–817.
  4. 4. Darmency H (1994) The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: introgression and weediness. Molecular Ecology 3: 37–40.
  5. 5. Schafer MG, Ross AA, Londo JP, Burdick CA, Lee EH, et al. (2011) The establishment of genetically engineered canola populations in the U.S. PLoS ONE. 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025736.
  6. 6. Warwick SI, Légère A, Simard MJ, James T (2008) Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population. Molecular Ecology 17: 1387–1395.
  7. 7. Eber F, Chèvre AM, Baranger A, Vallèe P, Tanguy X, et al. (1994) Spontaneous hybridization between a male-sterile oilseed rape and two weeds. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88: 362–368.
  8. 8. Baranger A, Chèvre AM, Eber F, Renard M (1995) Effect of oilseed rape genotype on the spontaneous hybridization rate with a weedy species an assessment of transgene dispersal. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 956–963.
  9. 9. Bing DJ, Downey RK, Rakow FW (1996) Hybridization among Brassica napus, B. rapa and B. juncea and their two weedy relatives B. nigra and Sinapis arvensis under open pollination conditions in the field. Plant Breeding 115: 470–473.
  10. 10. Jørgensen RB, Andersen B (1994) Spontaneous hybridization between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 1620–1626.
  11. 11. Wei W, Darmency H (2008) Gene flow hampered by low seed size of hybrids between oilseed rape and five wild relatives. Seed Science Research 18: 115–123.
  12. 12. Aparicio N, Villegas D, Araus JL, Blanco R, Royo C (2002) Seedling development and biomass as affected by seed size and morphology in durum wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science 139: 143–150.
  13. 13. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 125–159.
  14. 14. Gardner JC, Vanderlip RL (1989) Effect of seed size on developmental traits andability to tolerate drought in pearl millet. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 92: 49–59.
  15. 15. Verdu M, Traveset A (2005) Early emergence enhances plant fitness: a phylogenetically controlled metaanalysis. Ecology 86: 1385–1394.
  16. 16. Harper JL, Lovell PH, Moore KG (1970) The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 327–356.
  17. 17. Frello S, Hansen KR, Jensen J, Jørgensen RB (1995) Inheritance of rapeseed (Brassica napus)- specific RAPD markers and a transgene in the cross B. juncea×(B.juncea×B. napus). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 236–241.
  18. 18. Liu YB, Wei W, Ma KP, Darmency H (2010) Backcrosses to Brassica napus of hybrids between B. juncea and B. napus as a source of herbicide-resistant volunteer-like feral populations. Plant Science 179: 459–465.
  19. 19. Di K (2008) Fitness of Hybrids Formed between Transgenic Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus) and Brown Mustard (B. juncea) in the Field. PhD Dissertation, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
  20. 20. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  21. 21. Halfhill MD, Richards HA, Mabon SA, Stewart CN Jr (2001) Expression of GFP and Bt transgenes in Brassica napus and hybridization with Brassica rapa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 659–667.
  22. 22. Stanton ML (1985) Seed size and emergence time within a stand of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.): the establishment of a fitness hierarchy. Oecologia 67.
  23. 23. Choe HS, Chu C, Koch G, Gorham J, Mooney HA (1988) Seed weight and seed resources in relation to plant growth rate. Oecologia 76: 158–159.
  24. 24. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. London. : Academic Press.
  25. 25. Major DJ (1977) Influence of seed size on yield and yield components of rape. Agronomy Journal 69: 541–543.
  26. 26. Shanmuganathan V, Benjamin LR (1992) The influence of sowing depth and seed size on seedling emergence time and relative growth rate in spring cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.). Annals of Botany 69: 273–276.
  27. 27. Ahmed SU, Zuberi MI (1973) Effects of seed size on yield and some of its components in rape seed, Brassica campestris L. var. Toria. Crop Science 13: 119–120.
  28. 28. Peterson CM, Klepper B, Rickman RW (1989) Seed reserves and seedling development in winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 81: 245–251.
  29. 29. Harbur MM, Owen MDK (2004) Light and growth rate effects on crop and weed responses to nitrogen. Weed Science 52: 578–583.
  30. 30. Ghersa CM, Martinez-Ghersa MA (2000) Ecological correlates of weed seed size and persistence in the soil under different tilling systems implications for weed management. Field Crops Research 67: 141–148.
  31. 31. Di K, Stewart CN, Wei W, Shen BC, Tang ZX, et al. (2009) Fitness and maternal effects in hybrids formed between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and wild brown mustard [B. juncea (L.) Czern et Coss.] in the field. Pest Management Science 65: 753–760.
  32. 32. Bergelson J, Purrington CB (1996) Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. The American Naturalist 148: 536–558.
  33. 33. Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 278–285.
  34. 34. Mason P, Braun L, Warwick SI, Zhu B, Neal S (2003) Transgenic Bt-producing Brassica napus: Plutella xylostella selection pressure and fitness of weedy relatives. Environmental Biosafety Research 2: 263–276.
  35. 35. Snow AA, Pilson D, Rieseberg LH, Paulsen MJ, Pleskac N, et al. (2003) A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecological Applications 13: 279–286.
  36. 36. Ramachandran S, Buntin GD, All JN, Raymer PL, Stewart CN Jr (2000) Intraspecific competition of an insect-resistant transgenic canola in seed mixtures. Agronomy Journal 92: 368–374.
  37. 37. Vacher C, Weis AE, Hermann D, Kossler T, Young C, et al. (2004) Impact of ecological factors on the initial invasion of Bt transgenes into wild populations of birdseed rape (Brassica rapa). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 806–814.