Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) belongs to the Alphavirus genus and several species of this family are pathogenic to humans. The viruses are classified as potential agents of biological warfare and terrorism and sensitive detection as well as effective prophylaxis and antiviral therapies are required.
In this work, we describe the isolation of the anti-VEEV single chain Fragment variable (scFv), ToR67-3B4, from a non-human primate (NHP) antibody gene library. We report its recloning into the bivalent scFv-Fc format and further immunological and biochemical characterisation.
The scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 recognised viable as well as formalin and ß-propionolactone (ß-Pl) inactivated virus particles and could be applied for immunoblot analysis of VEEV proteins and immuno-histochemistry of VEEV infected cells. It detected specifically the viral E1 envelope protein of VEEV but did not react with reduced viral glycoprotein preparations suggesting that recognition depends upon conformational epitopes. The recombinant antibody was able to detect multiple VEEV subtypes and displayed only marginal cross-reactivity to other Alphavirus species except for EEEV. In addition, the scFv-Fc fusion described here might be of therapeutic use since it successfully inactivated VEEV in a murine disease model. When the recombinant antibody was administered 6 hours post challenge, 80% to 100% of mice survived lethal VEEV IA/B or IE infection. Forty to sixty percent of mice survived when scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was applied 6 hours post challenge with VEEV subtypes II and former IIIA. In combination with E2-neutralising antibodies the NHP antibody isolated here could significantly improve passive protection as well as generic therapy of VEE.
Citation: Rülker T, Voß L, Thullier P, O' Brien LM, Pelat T, Perkins SD, et al. (2012) Isolation and Characterisation of a Human-Like Antibody Fragment (scFv) That Inactivates VEEV In Vitro and In Vivo. PLoS ONE 7(5): e37242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037242
Editor: Lark L. Coffey, Blood Systems Research Institute, United States of America
Received: December 15, 2011; Accepted: April 18, 2012; Published: May 30, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Rülker et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) belongs to the Alphavirus genus within the Togaviridae family and was first isolated from horses in the 1930s , . Besides equids, several species of this virus family are also pathogenic to man and are recognized as potential agent of biological warfare and biological terrorism. VEEV is listed as a “Dirty Dozen agent” and is classified as Category B agent by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (http://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/agentlist-category.asp). The virus is highly infectious by the aerosol route  and an intentional release as a small-particle aerosol may be expected to infect a high percentage of individuals within an area of a least 10,000 km2 . Moreover, VEEV is responsible for VEE epidemics that occur in South and Central America –. It is a single stranded positive-sense RNA virus and is maintained in a cycle between rodents and mosquitoes in nature. VEEV represents a complex of viruses previously classified as subtypes I to VI. However, recent taxonomic changes have classified only the subtype I viruses as VEEV and differentiate five distinct variants (IA/B, IC, ID, IE, IF; http://ictvonline.org). Mainly the subtypes IA/B, IC and ID have been proven to be pathogenic for man. The disease they cause, ranges from mild febrile reactions to fatal encephalitic zoonoses and outcomes are significantly worse especially for young and elderly patients. Subtypes II–VI are now classified as distinct species (http://ictvonline.org) and especially Everglades and Mucambo virus (formerly subtypes II and IIIA) share a high level of genetic homology to VEEV and cause a similar human disease that may lead to encephalitis and death in a small proportion of cases .
Continued effort has been made to develop highly-sensitive monoclonal antibodies as well as recombinant antibodies for the immunological detection and diagnosis of VEEV –. Moreover, different well established identification principles like for example colorimetry, electrochemoluminescence and fluorescence immunoassays have been evaluated for the detection of VEE viruses –, –.
Two live, attenuated vaccines, TC-83  and V3526  were developed to prevent disease caused by VEEV, Everglades virus and Mucambo virus – but both formulations caused unacceptable levels of reactogenicity to allow for general licensure , , –.
A rather uncertain alternative to live attenuated vaccines are formalin inactivated vaccines against viral equine encephalitis. These vaccines do not produce any adverse side effects but have the disadvantage that they are of limited potency and available for humans at high risk only. The formalin inactivated VEEV vaccine, C84, for example, provides only a limited protection from aerosol challenge. It induces a limited neutralisation antibody response and requires regularly and periodic boosters . Therefore, antiviral therapies effective in prophylaxis and treatment of VEEV infection are required and the administration of virus neutralising or otherwise inactivating antibodies could serve as a reasonable alternative to vaccination. In addition, the application of murine antibodies to humans is often critical and limited due to their high immunogenicity, risk of serum sickness and anaphylactic shock. Therefore, human or humanised antibodies as well as antibodies from non-human primates like macaque could offer an alternative for passive protection or therapeutic treatment of VEE.
In this work, we describe the isolation of the anti-VEEV single scFv ToR67-3B4 using antibody phage display from a non-human primate (NHP) antibody gene library. We describe the immunological and biochemical characterisation of its cognate Fc-fusion and investigate its in vivo stability as well as its in vivo and in vitro inactivation potential in BALB/c mice.
Materials and Methods
The animal experiment was approved by the ethics committee for animal experimentation of IRBA-CRSSA (Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées - Centre de Recherche du Service de Santé des Armées). The ethics committee number for the VEE macaque immunisation was 2008/03.1. The immunisation with inactivated virus particles was performed according to the governmental french ethical guidelines: “Partie reglementaire du livre II du code rural (Titre I, chapitre IV, section 5, sous section 3: expérimentation sur l'animal)”, “Décret 87–848 du 19-10/1987 relatif aux expériences pratiquées sur les animaux vertébrés, modifié par le décret 2001/464 du 29/05/2001”, “Arrêté du 29 octobre 1990 relatif aux conditions de l'expérimentation animale pour le ministère de la défense” and “Instruction 844/DEF/DCSSA/AST/VET du 9 avril 1991 relative aux conditions de réalisation de l'expérimentation animale”. Animal care procedures were in compliance with the regulations detailed under the Animal Welfare Act  and in the Guide for the Care and use of Laboratory Animals . Animals were kept under stable temperature (22±2°C) and relative humidity (50%) conditions, with 12 hours of artificial lighting per day. Their cages were individual (6 per room) and each had a perch. Animals were fed twice a day, once with dried food, once with fresh fruits and vegetables, and water was provided concurrently. The food intake and general behaviour were observed during feeding by animal technicians, who were able to access a veterinarian if needed. Systematic veterinary visits to each NHP-room were conducted twice a week. General anesthesia was administered prior to any blood or bone marrow collection. Additionally, subsequent analgesics were administered in the following days by animal technicians if pain was suspected, according to the observations of animal behaviour.
The use of mice for passive protection studies for research purposes complied with UK guidelines. Animal protocols adhered to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, and protocols were approved by the UK Home Office. The study was performed under project licence 30/2425 and was approved internally by a Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) ethical review process.
Cell culture and virus production.
All viruses used in this study represent models for biowarfare agent relevant Alphavirus species and are either part of the strain collection of the Armed Forces Scientific Institute for Protection Technologies – NBC Protection (WIS) or are part of the strain collection of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, UK. Strains of VEEV from subtypes IA/B (Trinidad donkey; TrD), IC (P676), ID (3880), IE (Mena II), IF (78V), Everglades virus (formerly subtype II, strain Fe37c), Mucambo virus (formerly subtype IIIA, strain BeAn8), Pixuna virus (formerly subtype IV), Cabassou virus (formerly subtype V, strain CaAr508) and Rio Negro virus (formerly subtype VI, strain AG80) were kindly supplied by Dr. R.E. Shope (University of Texas Medical Branch, USA). Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) strain H178/99 and Western equine encephalitis virus (WEEV) strain H160/99 used in this study were received from the National Collection of Pathogenic Viruses (NCPV), UK.
Alphaviruses were either propagated in Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK), Vero-B4 (African green monkey kidney) or L929 (murine fibroblast) cells at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a biosafety 3 facility according to standard procedures as described , –. The cell lines were obtained from the DSMZ-ACC 33 (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH), Braunschweig, Germany or the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
All viruses were harvested from infected cells when 50–75% of the cell monolayer showed evidence of viral cytopathic effect (CPE). Virus titers were either determined by the 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50/mL) method according to Spearman and Kaerber or plaque assay –. Titers typically ranged from 1.0×107 to 1.2×1010 TCID50/ml.
Purification of Alphaviruses.
Virus containing supernatants from infected Vero cells were either purified by affinity chromatography on Matrex Cellufine Sulfate Medium™ (Virus Recovery System, VRS, Chisso America Inc., NY, USA) or by isopycnic density gradient centrifugation as described below. Matrex Cellufine Sulfate Medium™ (VRS) is a cellulose bead medium functionalised with a low concentration of sulfate esters that operates similar to a cation-exchange resin and has a high affinity for enveloped viruses. It selectively adsorbs complete virus particles as well as viral coats according to their charge. Briefly, 50 mL resin was equilibrated with adsorption buffer (0.01 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5). Up to 200 mL of virus containing prefiltered cell culture supernatant was loaded onto the column which then was washed twice with 0.01 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5. Elution of virus particles was performed with 1 M NaCl.
Purification of virus particles was carried out in two steps. Prepurification was performed by the sucrose cushion ultracentrifugation method (20% sucrose cushion), which causes low mechanical stress and allows the concentration and collection of morphologically intact particles after centrifugation at 112,000× g for 2 to 3 hours. The pellet was resuspended in 0.5 to 1 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and further purified by isopycnic density gradient centrifugation (20 to 60% sucrose) for 18 hours at 217,500× g. The virus containing fraction was removed and stored at −80°C until subjected to further analysis.
Inactivation of Alphaviruses.
Inactivation of all viral antigens was performed with a final concentration of 0.1% ß-propionolactone (ß-PL, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). Immediately before use a 10% ß-PL solution was prepared and 0.1 ml of this dilution was incubated with 5 ml of virus containing cell culture supernatant (pH 8 to 8.5) for 1 h at 4°C and 4 hours at 37°C with constant stirring. After 2 and 4 hours the pH of the cell culture supernatant was controlled and adjusted if necessary. In order to achieve a complete hydrolysis of remaining ß-PL after the inactivation the supernatant was kept at 4°C for another 12 to 18 hours. After low speed centrifugation of the sample for 30 min at 1000× g the viral inactivation was verified by inoculation of Vero cells and monitoring for cytopathic effects (CPE) for 3 to 5 days.
A male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) was immunised by intramuscular injection with 100 µl of the commercially available veterinary vaccine Fluvac Innovator Triple EFT plus EHV (Fort Dodge Animal Health, USA). This all-around vaccine is normally applied to horses in order to protect them from equine encephalitis caused by EEE, WEE and VEE viruses. In addition, the vaccine contains inactivated rhino- and influenza viruses as well as tetanus toxoid to protect horses from equine rhinopneumonitis, influenza and tetanus.
days after this first immunisation the macaque was immunised with 100 µl of VRS purified ß-PL inactivated VEEV TC83 (TCID50/ml of 2×1010) in combination with complete Freund's adjuvant. Subsequently, 5 additional antigen injections of 100 µl were performed after 65, 90,150, 210 and 350 days with incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Ten days after the final antigen injection the immune library was generated.
After each boost immune sera were gathered, inactivated for 20 min at 56°C and tested for VEEV specific antibody titer by ELISA. For this purpose either VRS-purified culture supernatants from VEEV TC83 infected Vero cells or uninfected cells were immobilised on 96 well-microtiter plates (Maxisorp™, Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany). For the determination of VEEV specific antibody titers serial dilutions of pre-immune-serum (PI 543) and immune sera (S543) were applied. Specifically bound antibodies were detected by incubation with rabbit anti-monkey IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1∶10.000, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Staining was performed with 3-3′, 5-5′ -tetramethylbenzidine (TMB, Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and stopped with 2 M sulphuric acid after 10 minutes. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm.
Library construction and screening of recombinant antibodies.
Lymphocytes of the macaque bone marrow were sampled after 6 boosts and subjected to RNA preparation by using Tri Reagent (Molecular Research Center Inc, Cincinnati, USA). The isolated RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA and diverse combinations of forward and reverse primers were used to amplify DNA, coding for the variable regions of antibodies, VLκ and VH . In order to obtain the cognate sublibraries, the PCR fragments were subcloned into the pGemT vector (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) as described –. For the phage-displayed library the precloned VH and VL repertoire was reamplified and specific restriction sites were inserted by PCR . For the construction of the library the reamplified VH and VL genes were subcloned into the phagemid pHAL14 in two successive ligation steps. The VH PCR products were subcloned into pHAL14 as HindIII-NcoI fragment, the VL PCR products were inserted as NotI-MluI fragment.
The phagemid pHAL14 was chosen as library vector because it allows phage display and the production of soluble antibody fragments without the necessity of recloning. pHAL14 is a high-copy plasmid and contains the scFv under the control of the lacI promoter/operator region which is inducible by IPTG. A His- and c-Myc-tag are encoded at the C-terminus in frame with the scFv and allow the straightforward purification of the recombinant antibody .
All cloning and ligation procedures necessary for the library construction were performed in E. coli XL1-Blue MRF' (Stratagene, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) according to Sambrook et al., 1989 . For DNA plasmid and PCR product purification the commercial Plasmid Mini Kit and QIAquick PCR Purification Kit from QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany, were used.
The library was packaged by using Hyperphage , . Therefore, 1 ml of the antibody gene library stock was grown to an OD600 nm of 0.4 to 0.5 and about 1.25×1010 E. coli XL1-Blue MRF' transformants were infected with 2.5×1011 Hyperphage.
E. coli cells and Hyperphage were incubated for 30 min at 37°C without shaking, followed by a further incubation for 30 min with shaking at 250 rpm. The infected cells were harvested by centrifugation and transferred to glucose-free TY-medium containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 50 µg/ml kanamycin in order to repress the lac promoter of pHAL14 and allow the expression of the scFv::pIII fusions. After incubation overnight at 250 rpm and 30°C bacteria were removed by centrifugation and phage particles in the culture supernatant were precipitated as previously described . The precipitated and packaged antibody phage library was then resuspended, titered and stored at 4°C until used for the panning and screening .
Surface presentation onto phage of the library was examined by SDS-PAGE, Western blotting and anti-pIII immuno-staining as described .
The process for the selection of specific scFv from a phage-displayed library is referred to as “panning,”and, in principle, involves the selection of Abs on the basis of their affinity.
The panning of VEEV specific scFv was performed on VRS purified VEEV presented by specifc mAbs coated onto 96 well microtitre plates (Maxisorb, Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) with minor modifications according to .
The panning and amplification of specifically bound phage was repeated three times before proceeding with postpanning analysis and each panning included a preselection and selection step. In order to remove unspecific binders, the library was preincubated in parallel with non-infected Vero cells and a nonspecific murine IgG. Therefore, 100 µl of the phage library was incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT) onto a mixture of coated and concentrated VRS supernatant from non-infected Vero cells plus 1% BSA (bovine serum albumin) in PBST (PBS plus 0.01% Tween 20) containing 10 µg/ml of the murine IgG D1-4G2-4-15 .Washing and reamplification of specifically bound phage was performed as described .
Sequencing and sequence analysis.
Sequencing was performed by GATC Inc. (Konstanz, Germany) using the oligonucleotide primer MHLacZ-Pro_f (5′ ggctcgtatgttgtgtgg 3′). The antibody gene fragments were analysed by using VBASE2 (http://www.vbase2.org) and Kabat's database of sequences of immunological interest (www.bioinf.org.uk) as previously described , .
Construction of stable eukaryotic tranfectants, expression and production of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4.
VEEV specific scFv gene fragments were subcloned from the immune library vector pHAL14 into the mammalian expression vector pCMV2.5-hIgG1-Fc by using the restriction sites NcoI and NotI . The mammalian expression vector allows the expression of scFvs in frame with the human IgG1 gene. The fusion is under the control of the CMV promoter. Moreover, the vector contains besides the bla-gene a neomycin phosphotransferase (Neo) expression cassette for antibiotic selection with G418.
For the stable production of VEEV specific scFv-Fc fusion proteins, Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells (CHO-K1), from the American Type Culture Collection, (ATCC, Rockwell, MD, No. CCL61) were transfected by using 80 µl Polyfect® (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) plus 4 to 5 µg of plasmid DNA. Stable clones were selected for resistance to the aminoglycoside antibiotic Geneticin (G418). For this purpose CHO-K1 cells were cultivated to 60% to 80% confluence overnight in 1000 mm2 Petri dishes (Nunc, Vienna, Austria) in non-selective Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM/HAM's F-12), a nutrient mixture supplemented with L-glutamine and sodium bicarbonate, containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) and 0.1% (w/v) penicillin and 0.1% (w/v) streptomycin (PAA, Parsing, Austria) at 37°C in 4% CO2 atmosphere. In order to support the DNA-lipid complex formation, plasmid DNA and Polyfect® were preincubated in serum- and antibiotic-free medium for 10 minutes at room temperature prior to transfection. While the lipid-DNA complex formation took place, CHO-K1 cells were washed with PBS. Afterwards, 7 ml of medium with FCS and penicillin/streptomycin was added to the complex. The whole mixture was then immediately added to the washed cells by gently swirling. Cells were incubated for 3 h with the transfection complex. Subsequently the medium was removed and replaced with fresh non-selective DMEM/HAM's F-12 containing 10% (v/v) FCS and 0.1% (w/v) penicillin/streptomycin before the plates were incubated overnight at 37°C in 4% CO2. A further medium change was performed one day after the transfection. The transfected cells were trypsinised and re-sown 1∶20 or 1∶50 in new Petri dishes on selective medium, containing additionaly 700 mg/ml G418. Medium change was performed every 3 to 4 days and first stable and G418-resistant clones were visible about 3 weeks after transfection. Four and five weeks after transfection single clones were isolated and cultivated onto 24 well plates (Nunc, Vienna, Austria). Since the productivity of individual clones varies, we tested the supernatant of 48 clones for VEEV-specific scFv-fusion production in ELISAs as described. Finally, three of the best expressing CHO-K1-clones were cultivated as suspension culture in a miniPerm bioreactor (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) in DMEM/HAM's F-12 containing 10% (v/v) (FCS), 1% (w/v) penicillin/streptomycin and 700 mg/ml G418 at 37°C in 4% CO2. The culture supernatant was harvested twice a week and replaced by fresh medium. Purification of recombinant fusion proteins was done by immunoaffinity chromatography on goat anti-human (GAH) sepharose.
Biotinylation of mAbs and scFv-Fc fusions.
One to two mg of mAb or scFv-Fc was dissolved in sodium bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.5, and incubated with an aliquot of the biotin N- hydroxysuccinimide ester (long arm, water soluble) from Vector laboratories, CA, USA, equal to 1/10 the weight of the protein to be labeled. The mixture was incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. In order to stop the reaction 10 mg of glycine was added and unreacted biotin was removed by gel filtration with PD-10 desalting columns containing Sephadex G25 (GE Healthcare, USA) according to the suppliers' protocol.
Enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs) with scFv-Fc fusions
Sucrose density gradient-purified antigen from strains TrD, P676, 3880, Mena II, 78 V, Fe37c, BeAn8, Pixuna, CaAr508 and AG80 (subtypes IA/B, IC, ID, IE, IF, formerly subtypes II IIIA, IV, V and VI) were coated on 96-well Maxisorp™ microtiter plates purchased from Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany. The viral protein concentration was determined by SDS-PAGE and scanning dosimetry, dilutions were performed in 50 mM bicarbonate buffer pH 8.5. After blocking with PBS containing 1% (w/v) skimmed milk powder (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) plus 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 detection of VEEV strains was performed with different log10 dilutions of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 for 2 hours at room temperature (RT). The starting concentration was 1 µg/ml. Subsequently the microwell plates were washed with PBS-T and the presence of bound antibody was detected by using peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti-human IgG (1∶4.000, AbD Serotec, UK) as secondary antibody. TMB-substrate (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) was used as chromogenic substrate, absorbance was measured at 450 nm.
Direct Sandwich ELISA.
All sandwich ELISAs were performed in 96 microwell plates (Maxisorp™, Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) that were either coated with 3 µg/ml antibody or scFv-Fc by incubation for 2 h at 37°C or overnight at 4°C. For the detection of VEEV we used either the monoclonal antibody (mAb) VEE-WIS1 or a mixture of mAbs VEE-WIS1, SFV3/4 and SFV 12/2 as capture antibodies , –. MAb VEE-WIS1 (E1-specific) regognises specifically VEEV of subtype IA/B, while the antibody mixture binds Old world as well as New world Alphaviruses. In order to capture WEEV specifically mAb SVF 12/2 was applied. The ELISA to detect EEE virus was done on plates coated with a mixture of mAbs SFV 8/6 (E1-specific), SFV3/4 and SFV 12/2 , –. Subsequently antibody coated microtiter plates were washed and blocked with 1% FCS in PBS-T during 1 h at room temperature. After further washes, wells were additionally overlayed with liquid plate sealer (Candor Bioscience GmbH, Wangen, Germany), stored at 4°C and used for ELISA studies within three to six weeks. Samples with virus were incubated for 2 h at room temperature on precoated microwell plates and afterwards extensively washed. Bound viruses were detected by using biotinylated scFv-Fcs or mAbs in appropriate dilutions (1∶500, 1∶2000 or 1∶5000) and incubation for 1 h at 37°C. After three further washes the conjugate Streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (PSA, GE Healthcare, USA) was applied to the wells in a 1∶ 6000 dilution and plates were incubated for 30 min at RT with agitation. Bound biotinylated mAbs and fusions were detected by using TMB staining (commercial solution from Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) that was stopped with 2 M sulphuric acid after 10 minutes. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm.
ScFv-Fc fusion proteins and several monoclonal antibodies as positive controls were used to detect VEEV specific envelope proteins.
Therefore, purified VEEV particles were disrupted either by incubation for 20 minutes at 56°C or 5 minutes at 95°C in Laemmli sample buffer  containing either no or 1 mM DTT. The viral proteins were separated by 15% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Protran, BA85, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). The membrane was blocked with PBS plus 1% Casein, pH7.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Dreieich, Germany) for 1 h at RT. For the detection of virus-specific proteins, the membrane was incubated with either biotinylated scFv-Fc (Tor67-3B4: 1∶5000) fusions or mAbs (SFV 8/6: E1-specific mAb, 1∶10.000; WIS-VEE1: E1-specific mAb, 1∶1.000; 1A3B7: E2-specific mAb, 1∶1.000) for 1.5 h at RT in the dark. After 3 washes with PBS-T the membrane was incubated with the conjugate streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (1∶1000, GE Healthcare, Munic, Germany) for 30 min. Staining and visualisation of specific proteins was performed with 5-Brom-4-Chlor-3-Indolyl-Phosphat/Nitro Tetrazolium Blue Chloride (NBT-BCIP, Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Dreieich, Germany) according to standard procedures.
Vero cells (100 µl of 2×105 cells/ml) were grown in 96-well microtiter plates for 24 h and subsequently infected with serial log10 dilutions of either VEEV TC83 or TrD. Non-infected Vero cells served as negative control. Specific staining of VEEV infected cells was performed with biotinylated scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 and mAb SFV 8/6 as positive control. In detail, one day post infection the infected cells were fixed with 3% formalin in PBS for 3 h at 4°C. Afterwards the fixed samples were incubated with their cognate antibodies in either a 1∶5000 or 1∶10.000 dilution in PBSF-T (PBST plus 1% FCS) for 1 h in a humid chamber at 37°C. After 3 consecutive washes in PBS-T the fixed cells were incubated for 30 min with the conjugate streptavidin - horseradish peroxidase (PSA, GE Healthcare, USA) diluted 1∶6000 in PBS-FT. After further extensive washing and in order to visualise infected cells microscopically, the samples were incubated with the precipitating colorimetric peroxidase substrate TMB (KPL, Germany) for 10 minutes. Staining was stopped by rinsing the plates with Millipore-purified water.
Neutralising peroxidase-linked antibody (NPLA) assay.
The NPLA assay for scFv-Fc fusions and complete IgG antibodies was done according to the technique of Jensen  with several modifications. All assays were performed in 96 well microwell plates and Vero cells were used as host for infection. Fifty µl of two-fold dilutions of scFv-Fc fusions or mAbs (starting concentration between 0.5 to 1.0 mg/ml) were incubated with an equal volume of VEE virus strains TC-83, TrD or Fe3-7c with a TCID50/ml of 5×104 for 2 hours at 37°C in 96-well plates. Following this incubation, 100 µl of freshly trypsinised Vero cells at a concentration of 4×105 cells/ml were transferred to the antibody virus mixture.
As positive control for infection, virus samples not preincubated with any antibody as well as virus samples preincubated with VEEV specific antibodies that do not display any neutralising activity like mAb WIS VEE1 were used. Moreover, virus samples preincubated with mAb SFV 8/6 and 1A3B-7, both antibodies with known neutralizing capacity ( and Hülseweh, personal communication) were applied as a positive control and non-infected Vero cells served as negative control. Twenty to twenty-four hours post infection all cell monolayers were fixed with 3% formalin in PBS for 3 h at 4°C and infection of cells was demonstrated by specific immunostaining of viral antigens. After washing with PBS-T, the monolayers were overlaid with 100 µl of a 1∶5000 dilution of the VEEV-specific biotinylated mAb SFV 8/6 and incubated for 2 h at RT. Bound biotinylated mAbs were detected by using the streptavidin HRP conjugate (GE Healthcare, USA, 1∶6.000) and visualisation was performed with precipitating TMB as substrate. The staining reaction was stopped by adding 100 µl of 1 M sulphuric acid and absorbance was measured at 450 nm in a microwell plate reader. The absorbance values were correlated to relative infectious activity. Thereby absorption at 450 nm (OD450 nm) values of the positive control, namely Vero B4 cells infected with VEEV, were set as 100% infectivity. A reduction equal or greater than 50% in A450nm in the wells was considered as indicative for neutralisation.
Plaque reduction Assay.
The ability of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 (25 µg) to neutralise virus infectivity was determined by mixing the construct with VEEV strains TrD, Fe37c or BeAn8 (approximately 100 pfu) and incubating at 4°C overnight. Residual infectious virus was estimated by a standard plaque assay in L929 cells as described .
Determination of the in vivo half-life of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4.
Sera were harvested from the marginal tail veins of three BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old; Charles River Laboratories, UK). Five days later, 100 µg scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 were injected by the intraperitoneal route. Serum samples were collected 8 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 10 d, 15 d and 25 d post-administration. The concentration of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 in sera was determined by ELISA using sucrose density gradient-purified β-propiolactone inactivated antigen of VEEV strain TC-83. Antibody concentrations were estimated by comparison of the absorbance values generated by diluted serum samples with a standard curve prepared with scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4.
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (http://www.graphpad.com). To determine the half-life of scFv-Fc ToR-3B4 in vivo, a linear regression model was fitted to the log transformed data to estimate the rate of change over time. A change of 0.30 units on the log scale equates to a 50% reduction of the data on the original scale. This value is divided by the estimated model slope to obtain the half-life.
Passive protection studies.
BALB/c mice, 6–8 weeks old, were used for all passive antibody protection studies. Mice were challenged by the airborne route with 100LD50 strain TrD , . The LD50s for strains Mena II, Fe37c and Mucambo virus have not been determined. However, titres were used in the collision nebuliser that have reliably achieved 100% mortality in previous experiments , . Afterwards mice remained either untreated or were injected intraperitoneally with 100 µg scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4, human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) or control construct (anti-WEEV). Mice received just one injection at a single time-point (6, 24, 48 or 72 h) post-challenge and were monitored for clinical signs of infection (piloerection, hunching, inactivity, excitability and paralysis) twice daily by an observer who was unaware of the treatment allocations. Animals were scored according to the severity of the clinical signs and were humanely culled as appropriate . These experiments therefore record the occurrence of severe disease rather than mortality. Even though it is rare for animals infected with virulent VEEV and showing signs of severe illness to survive, our use of humane endpoints should be considered when interpreting any virus dose expressed here as 50% lethal doses (LD50). In one experiment, sera were harvested by cardiac puncture from mice that were alive fourteen days post-challenge. Samples were assayed for VEEV-specific antibodies using sucrose density gradient-purified β-propiolactone-inactivated antigen from strain TC-83.
Construction of the macaque immune library and screening of VEEV specific recombinant antibodies
In order to generate antibody fragments reactive to members of the VEE virus sero-complex we constructed a VEEV specific scFv antibody gene library 360 days post the sixth immunisation of a non-human primate (Macaca fascicularis) with ß-PL inactivated VEEV TC83. Donor sera ELISA titers to VEEV TC83 rose continuously in the course of immunisation and showed a clear VEEV-specific binding in comparison to the pre-immune serum. After six VEEV TC83 injections, the specific serum antibody titer was equal to 1∶10240 (Figure 1). Moreover, this final serum was tested positive for neutralisation of VEEV TC83 (data not shown).
Either VRS-purified culture supernatants from VEEV TC83 infected Vero cell or uninfected cells (negative control) were immobilised on 96well-microtiter plates. For the detection of a VEEV specific antibody titer, serial dilutions of pre-immune serum (PI 543) and immune serum (S543) after the sixth boost were applied. Bound antibodies were detected by rabbit anti-monkey IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase and staining with TMB.
For the macaque immune library, total RNA was isolated from lymphocytes of the bone marrow and reverse transcribed to cDNA. After PCR amplification and precloning of the antibody fragments for VH and VLκ the final phage displayed library was established in the phagemid pHAL14, a vector that allows phage display and the production of soluble antibody fragments without the necessity of recloning. . The library quality was analysed by colony PCR. About 90% of the 1.6×107 independent clones contained a full size scFv insert. In order to improve the antibody display efficiency the library was packaged by Hyperphage, a substitute for M13KO7 helper phage. Correct surface presentation onto phage was examined by SDS-PAGE, Western blotting and anti-pIII immuno-staining as described .
All pannings were performed in a biosafety level 3 laboratory by using the VEEV vaccine strain, TC83, as a medically important and epizootic antigen.
The phage display antibody gene library was subjected to 3 rounds of panning and representative phage clones were assessed for their ability to bind to VEEV TC83 immobilized onto 96 microwell plates. The enrichment of false-positive antibody phage particles was excluded by preincubation of the library with the supernatant of non-infected Vero cells. Non-specific binding of scFv phage to the VEEV-specific capture antibodies mAb 8747 and mAb VEE-WIS1 was reduced by preabsorption of the library. Moreover, these two antibodies were added for competitive binding during the panning procedure.
In total, 322 monoclonal soluble scFvs produced from E. coli clones were analysed by ELISA on immobilized inactivated VEEV particles. Twenty-four monoclonal ELISA positive binders were identified. Their specific antigen binding was confirmed on infectious as well as on ß-PL inactivated VEEV of subtype IA/B.
Sequencing and nucleic acid analysis of scFv clones
The DNA fragments of 24 positive monoclonal binders were sequenced in order to identify unique binders and to define the germline gene family and the amino-acid subgroups of the heavy (VH) and light (VL) chain variable regions. However, three rounds of panning yielded only one unique VEEV-specific clone that predominated the resulting antibody panel. All binders were identical in their VH and VL sequences. Thereafter, further analysis was exclusively performed with the binder ToR67-3B4. The alignment of the amino acid sequence of ToR67-3B4 to VBASE2, the integrative database of germ-line variable genes from IgG loci of human and mouse, showed the highest similarity to the human IGHV4-59*01 and IGKV2-30*01. Furthermore, we calculated the G-score of the antibody's variable (V) regions since macaque antibodies have been suggested to have extremely human-like character , a property that could be especially beneficial for a therapeutical antibody. The VH region of ToR67-3B4 had a G-score of 0.707 thus meaning that it has the same level of similarity as 24% VH sequences present in Kabat's database. If the human VH sequences present in Kabat's database are regarded as representative of human VH sequences, this result may be summarized as “the VH region of ToR67-3B4 is as human as 24% of human VH regions”. The VL chain displayed a G-score of −1.505, indicating that it is “as human as” 7% of human sequences present in the Kabat database.
Enhancing ToR67-3B4 binding properties by subcloning the scFv in an eucaryotic expression vector
By one step subcloning, the scFv ToR67-3B4 was inserted as a NcoI-NotI fragment into the mammalian expression vector pCMX2.5-hIgG1-Fc-XP, that allowed the fusion of scFv antibody coding regions to the gene fragment encoding the human IgG1 Fc part (hinge-CH2-CH3) and enabled the stable expression of homodimeric and bivalent scFv-Fc fusion proteins in CHO-K1 cells. Moreover, the IgG1 Fc part allowed routinely high affinity purification with goat anti-human antibodies coupled to sepharose. The fusion of a scFv to a Fc part mediates enhanced in vitro protein stability, could prolong serum half-life and mediates IgG effector functions if necessary .
Reactivity of scFv-Fc fusion ToR-3B4 to different VEEV strains and other Alphaviruses
The ability of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 to recognise different subtypes of VEEV strains was evaluated by an indirect ELISA. For this purpose, sucrose density gradient-purified antigens from strains TrD, P676, 3880, Mena II, 78 V, Fe37c, BeAn8, Pixuna, CaAr508 and AG80 (subtypes IA/B, IC, ID, IE, IF, formerly subtypes II, IIIA, IV, V and VI respectively) were prepared and coated in comparable amounts onto 96-well microtiter plates. At a concentration of 1 µg/ml, scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 reacted with multiple VEEV subspecies in ELISA with a strong affinity to all subtype 1 varieties (IA/B, IC, ID, IE, IF) but also recognized Everglades, Mucambo, Pixuna, Cabassou and Rio Negro virus (formerly subtypes II, IIIA, IV, V and VI, see Figure 2A). Diluting scFv-Fc TOR-3B4 proved that the recombinant antibody reacted equally well with all the VEEV strains to which it was able to bind strongly.
Panel 2A shows the antigen binding efficiency of ToR67-3B4 on different immobilised VEEV subtypes at a concentration of 1 µg/ml, n = 1 for all data points. Panel 2B illustrates the cross-reactivity of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 to a range of Alphavirus species analysed by a sandwich ELISA. Antigens were captured by an anti-Alphavirus mAb mix, specifically bound virus was detected by biotinylated scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 (1∶5000). The insert in the upper right corner of the bar chart shows the positive control and demonstrates that all Alphaviruses except SINV are specifically captured by the antibody mixture. Detection of virus was performed with the same biotinylated anti- Alphavirus mAb mix. All viral antigens were applied with a TCID50/ml of 5×107 to 108. Culture supernatant of non-infected Vero cells was used as negative control. The mean values of two ELISAs from two independent experiments are shown. In panel 2C scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was applied as capture antibody in combination with the cognate Alphavirus-specific antibody mixture for group-specific detection. Viral antigens were applied with a TCID50/ml of 5×107 to 108. Culture supernatant of non-infected Vero was used as negative control. The mean values of two ELISAs from three independent experiments are shown. Panel 2D shows the detection limit for vaccine strain TC83 (subtype IA/B) using capture antibody mAb VEE WIS1 paired with biotinylated scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 detector antibody (1∶5000). Virus was titrated in 2-fold dilutions. The data represents 2 separate experiments with 3 replicates of each concentration. Abbreviations used in this legend are BHK: Baby hamster kidney cells, VEEV: Venezuelean equine encephalitis virus, WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus, EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus, CHIKV: Chikungunya virus, SINV: Sindbis virus and SFV: Semliki Forest virus.
Moreover, the ability of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 to detect different Alphavirus species was tested by a direct sandwich ELISA, using scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 either as detection (Figure 2B) or capture antibody (Figure 2C). As illustrated in figure 2B scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 displayed only marginal cross-reactivity to other Alphavirus species except for EEEV if applied for detection. The recombinant antibody can be combined with the capture antibody mAb VEE WIS1 for the highly specific detection of VEEV. At least a TCID50/ml of 106 was manifested as detection limit in a sandwich ELISA for strain TC83 (IA/B).
Despite this, if scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was applied as capture antibody in combination with an Alphavirus-specific detection mix the recombinant antibody displayed a considerably broader cross-reactivity. As illustrated in figure 2C, scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 bound additionally to VEEV, EEEV, CHIKV and SFV. It also showed a low relative binding efficiency to SINV and WEEV.
Immunohistochemistry and Immunoblot analysis
ScFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 can be used for immunohistochemistry of VEEV infected cells and Western blot analysis of VEEV proteins (Figure 3). As expected, Vero cells infected with VEEV TrD displayed a strong perinuclear signal 1 day post infection when stained with either scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 or the well established mAb SFV 8/6 , , . Similar results were obtained for Vero cells infected with the vaccine derivative TC83 (data not shown) while non-infected cells showed no specific binding.
Panel A and B show the immunoblot analysis of VEEV glycoproteins with scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 and monoclonal antibodies. Proteins from VEEV strain TC-83 were either resolved on an 8–15% gradient (panel A) or a linear 12% polyacrylamide gel (panel B) under denaturing and non-reducing conditions at 56°C (panel A) or at 56°C and 95°C (panel B) under denaturing conditions with or without 100 mM DTT. After Western blotting the membrane was cut in stripes and was probed with either scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 (Panel A lane 2 and 6; panel B all lanes) or E1- and E2-specific mAbs (Panel A lane 1 and 5: SFV 8/6 (E1-specific); lane 3: WIS-VEE1 (E1-specific); lane 4: 1A3B7 (E2-specific)). Scale indicates protein size in kDa. Panel C depicts the immunohistochemistry of Vero cells infected with VEEV TrD, 1 day post infection. Photomicrographs were obtained from infected (I–IV) and non–infected (V) cells with a 10fold magnification lens. Cells in panel I and II were stained for VEEV antigen with biotinylated scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4, infected cells in panel III and IV were detected with biotinylated mAb SFV 8/6 as positive control. Non-infected Vero cells in panel V were stained with scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 as negative control.
The glycoprotein envelope of Alphaviruses is made up of two proteins, E1 and E2. While E1 is responsible for the fusion process with the host cell membrane, E2 is responsible for cell receptor binding. In order to examine which VEEV specific structural glycoprotein is recognised by scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 we electrophoretically separated purified virus samples after disintegration in a 15% PAA gel under non-reducing conditions. The proteins were blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane and stained as described. The E1 specific antibodies mAb SFV 8/6 ,  and mAb VEE WIS1 as well as the E2-specific antibody mAb 1A3B7 served as positive control and detected proteins of about 47 kDa and 52 KDa. The recombinant antibody recognized specifically the Alphavirus E1 glycoprotein of about 47 kDa (Figure 3A). If the virus sample was additionally reduced by adding DTT prior to SDS-PAGE, no specific binding was observed.
Neutralisation activity of scFv-Fc fusion proteins against multiple VEEV strains
Heterodimers of the E1 and E2 structural proteins occur on the surface of VEEV and antibody reactivity to either glycoprotein may result in protection against disease in vitro and in vivo , , –.
For this purpose the ability of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 to neutralise virus infectivity in vitro was assessed for different VEEV strains in 2 to 3 independent experiments. Serial dilutions of scFv-Fc ToR67 3B4 were mixed with a TCID50/ml of 5×104 of VEEV of subtype IA/B and II. The virus antibody mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 2 hours and subsequently subjected to cell culture infection. Residual infectious activity of virus was estimated by specific immunostaining one day post infection with VEEV-specific antibodies. Absorbance (OD450 nm) values obtained with virus samples not preincubated with any antibody served as the positive control and were set as 100% infectivity, non-infected Vero cells were used as the negative control.
A reduction in absorbance at 450 nm equal to or greater than 50% in wells was considered as indicative of neutralization. In addition, virus samples preincubated with VEEV specific antibodies with known neutralising activity, like mAb SFV 8/6 or mAb1A3B7, were used as controls.
ScFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 caused a reduction of infectivity of vaccine strain TC83 to 40% and was able to reduce VEEV infectivity of Everglades virus (formerly subtype II) to 25%. Neutralization of infectivity of both strains was only achieved with high concentrations of antibody. However, scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was clearly not able to neutralize the VEEV wildtype strain TrD (Fure 4).
VEEV strains of subtype IA/B (Panel A and B) and Everglades virus (strain Fe37c, Panel C) with a TCID50/ml of 5×104 were incubated with serial dilutions of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 and other mAbs at 37°C for 2 hours. Starting concentrations were between 0.5 to 1.0 mg/ml. Subsequently the mixtures were subjected to cell culture infection. Residual infectious activity of virus was estimated by specific immunostaining one day post infection with VEEV-specific antibodies. Absorbance (OD450 nm) values obtained with virus samples not preincubated with any antibody served as positive control and were set as 100% infectivity. Non-infected Vero cells were used as negative control. The mean values of two independent experiments are shown.
Furthermore, the recombinant construct reduced the number of plaques of Mucambo virus (strain BeAn8, formerly subtype IIIA) and plaques of Everglades and Mucambo virus (formerly subtype II and IIIA) produced in the presence of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 were greatly reduced in size compared to the controls (data not shown).
Passive protection of mice in vivo
Mice have been widely used for studies of VEE pathogenesis, testing of vaccines and therapeutic treatment. Infection by either the intranasal or subcutaneous routes results in the invasion of the central nervous system and 100% mortality –.
Since a sufficient in vivo stability of an antibody is a basic requirement for successfull protection in vivo, the half-life of ToR67-3B4 in BALB/c mice was estimated before the recombinant antibody was applied in virus challenge experiments. One-hundred µg of the scFv-Fc were injected intraperitoneally and sera were harvested from the murine marginal tail veins at 8 hours, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 25 days post-administration. The serum antibody concentration of the remaining scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 in blood was determined by ELISA and the recombinant antibody was no longer detectable after 5 days (data not shown). The decrease in antibody serum concentration over time resulted in a half-life of 1.68 d (95% confidence intervals: 1.65–1.71 d, data not shown) that was considered as sufficient to justify analysing the therapeutic potential of this construct.
Therefore, mice were exposed to VEEV strain TrD (subtype IA/B), Mena II (subtype IE), Fe37c (formerly subtype II) and Mucambo virus (strain BeAn8, formerly subtype IIIA) by the aerosol route. Six to seventy-two hours later, 100 µg of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was administered intraperitoneally to a subset of mice and mice were monitored for clinical signs of VEE for 14 days. Naïve mice as well as mice treated with human IgG or a non-specific recombinant antibody (anti-WEEV) did not survive the challenge (median time to death, 6 d) but the recombinant antibody was able to provide significant levels of protection to infected mice (Figure 5) (P = 0.0008, Mantel-Haenszel Logrank test). When the recombinant antibody was administered 6 hours post challenge with VEEV strains TrD or Mena II 80 to 100% of mice survived but died within 6 to 7 days when antibodies were applied after 24 hours or later. Forty to sixty % of mice survived when scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was applied 6 hours post challenge with VEEV strains Fe37c and Mucambo virus (strain BeAn8).
BALB/c mice were challenged by the aerosol route with approximately 100 LD50 VEEV strain TrD (Panel A and B), Mena II, Fe37c and Mucambo virus (BeAn8, Panel C and D). Six, twenty-four, forty-eight and seventy-two hours later they were injected with 100 µg scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 intraperitoneally (Panel A, B and C, n = 6 or 10). As negative control mice remained either untreated or were injected with a human IgG1 antibody (Panel B) or a nonspecific antibody (anti-WEEV, Panel D, n = 10 or 5). Animals were observed twice daily for clinical signs of infection and were culled when appropriate using humane endpoints.
In order to ascertain that scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was able to prevent viral infection, sera were harvested from the surviving mice and analysed for VEEV-specific antibody by ELISA. A murine-specific peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was utilised to distinguish the response induced by the murine immune system from scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4. All mice generated an immune response to VEEV (results not shown), indicating that viral infection had taken place. However, it is not known if this response contributed to the survival of mice treated with scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4.
Screening and isolation of anti-VEEV antibody fragments from a NHP antibody gene library by using phage display was completed successfully. All selected binders shared the same sequence which is not unusual for antibodies from immune libraries containing affinity matured binders.
The scFv as well as the cognate Fc-fusion were able to detect infectious as well as chemically inactivated VEEV viral antigen of subtype IA/B. When applied as detection antibody scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 exhibited a broad immunological cross-reactivity to all serogroups of the VEEV complex but displayed only marginal cross-reactivity to other Alphavirus species except for EEEV which might be explained by the fact that VEEV is genetically less distinct from EEEV than from SFV and WEEV , . In combination with the subtype-specific mAb VEE WIS1 the strain TC83 as representative of VEEV subtype IA/B was detected up to at least aTCID50/ml of 106. In contrast, if scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was applied as capture antibody, the recombinant antibody displayed a considerably broader cross-reactivity and identified VEEV, EEEV and SFV as well. Furthermore, it showed a low relative binding efficiency to CHIKV and WEEV.
Immunoblot analysis verified that scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 recognises specifically the viral E1 glycoprotein. We suppose that the Fc-fusion detects a conformational rather than a linear epitope since a specific staining of the viral envelope protein occurred after denaturation at 56°C and 95°C under non-reducing but not under reducing conditions. ScFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 seems to be one of the rare and to our knowledge the first E1-specific scFv-fusion that was able to neutralise virus infectivity in vitro for VEEV strains of subtype IA/B, IE, II and Mucambo virus (formerly subtype IIIA). Whereas strains of subtype IA/B are epizootic, strains like Mena II (subtype IE), Fe37c (Everglades virus, formerly subtype II) and BeAn8 (Mucambo virus, formerly subtype IIIA) are enzootic and induce a less progressive disease in mice. Moreover, infection with enzootic strains is considered as non-lethal for human and equidae , . Interestingly, scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was able to neutralise virus infectivity of vaccine strain TC83 but failed to inactivate the closely related wild type strain TrD although it bound well to it in ELISA. The deduced amino acid sequences of the E1 glycoprotein of strain TC83 and its parent strain TrD differ by a single amino acid change. An introduction of genetic changes manifested at the amino acid level caused by sequentially passaging over years as described  was excluded by nucleic acid sequencing.
In the past, antibodies that specifically recognize and neutralise VEEV in vitro and in vivo have been described. Most of them are directed against the E2 protein, only a few targeted the viral E1 protein , , , , .
The neutralization efficiency of scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was less than that of the two E2-targeting control antibodies mAb SFV 8/6 and 1A3B7. Moreover, incubation of virus with scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 had an influence on plaque morphology and size. Our data support results of previous studies that clearly documented that neutralisation efficiency for anti-E1 Fabs (fragment, antibody binding) and mAbs are significantly lower than that for anti–E2 mAbs , , –, , , .
Interestingly, scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 had potent ability to protect mice from infection with VEEV subtype IA/B and IE, Everglades and Mucambo virus (formerly subtypes II and IIIA) when administered 6 hours post challenge but failed to cure mice if applied 24, 48 or 72 hours post challenge. In addition, scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 was able to protect mice against challenge with VEEV strain TrD although it failed to neutralise this virus strain in vitro. Our results give evidence that protection against VEEV disease by scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 is not necessarily associated with the ability to neutralise VEE virus. The findings reported here are consistent with data from other groups , , –,  and we suppose that scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 binds to a critical site for cell interaction of the VEEV virion either at the level of virus entry, or budding. Whether complement or other Fc effector functions are necessary in VEE virus immunity has to be analysed.
Furthermore, our results clearly indicate that the window in which antibody therapy of VEE is efficacious is short , , , , . However, treatment offered a significant benefit for mice as demonstrated in this study. Whether a similar effect in mice is achieved if scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 is used prophylactically, has to be evaluated. The optimal time for administration of the recombinant binder post challenge seems to be a matter of antibody half-life and clearance. For scFv-Fc ToR67-3B4 the half life was estimated to 1.68 days which is slightly lower than the half-lives of two previously investigated antibodies , .
Besides applications for specific detection and identification purposes, the NHP antibody described here may have application for human antiviral therapy. Database comparison of scFv ToR67-3B4 indicated the highest similarity to the human IGHV4-59*01 and IGKV2-30*01. Its variable regions were as similar to human VH or VL sequences as 24 and 7% present in Kabat's database respectively. Therefore, scFv ToR67-3B4 might be regarded “as human” as these human sequences. Generally, a high level of humanness is expected to correspond to decreased immunogenicity and could be beneficial for therapeutic treatment of VEE.
It may be even further improved by germline humanisation which aims, without altering the antibody's affinity, at suppressing the macaque specific amino acids , . In addition, the human constant regions utilized in the construction of the scFv-Fc could even activate the human immune effectors better than their murine counterparts and possibly allow an even better protection in humans than seen in mice in the present study.
Previously chimeric, humanised and human antibodies have successively been exploited as therapeutics in the murine model but all these antibodies target the VEEV E2 glycoprotein , , , . ToR67-3B4 is to our knowledge the first VEEV inactivating scFv-Fc that targets the VEEV E1 glycoprotein and we assume that the NHP antibody could provide enhanced prophylaxis or immunotherapy for VEEV if used in combination with the so far characterised neutralising E2-specific anti-VEEV antibodies. Moreover, an antibody possessing reactivity to a wide range of VEEV strains in vivo may be of benefit as a generic antiviral therapy.
We gratefully acknowledge the kind and excellent technical assistance of Katrin Böhling. In addition, we would like to thank Dr. J.T. Roehrig for providing us with the mAb 1A3B7.
Conceived and designed the experiments: BH MH PT LMO. Performed the experiments: BH TR LV LMO TP CL. Analyzed the data: BH MH SDP PT HJM SD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BH MH PT LMO SDP HJM TS SD. Wrote the paper: BH MH TR HJM.
- 1. Kubes V, Ríos FA (1939) The causative agent of infectious Equine Encephalomyelitis in Venezuela. Science 90: 20–21.
- 2. Powers AM, Brault AC, Shirako Y, Strauss EG, Kang W, et al. (2001) Evolutionary Relationships and Systematics of the Alphaviruses. J Virol 75: 10118–10131.
- 3. Reed DS, Lind CM, Sullivan LJ, Pratt WD, Parker MD (2004) Aerosol Infection of Cynomolgus Macaques with Enzootic Strains of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Viruses. J Infect Dis 189(6): 1013–1017.
- 4. Smith JF, Davis K, Hart MK, Ludwig GV, McClain DJ, et al. (1997) Viral encephali-tides. Textbook of Military Medicine; Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Washington DC: Office of surgeon general. pp. 561–589.
- 5. Powers AM, Oberste MS, Brault AC, Rico-Hesse R, Schmura SM, et al. (1997) Repeated emergence of epidemic/epizootic Venezuelan equine encephalitis from a single genotype of enzootic subtype ID virus. J Virol 71: 6697–6705.
- 6. Weaver SC, Salas R, Rico-Hesse R, Ludwig GV, Oberste MS, et al. (1996) RB: Re-emergence of epidemic Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis in South America. VEE Study Group Lancet 348: 436–440.
- 7. Sudia WD, Newhouse VF, Beadle ID, Miller DL, Johnston JG Jr, et al. (1975) Epidemic Venezuelan equine encephalitis in North America in 1971: vector studies. Am J Epidemiol 101: 17–35.
- 8. Johnson KM, Martin DH (1974) Venezuelan equine encephalitis. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med 18: 79–116.
- 9. Roehrig JT, Bolin RA (1997) Monoclonal antibodies capable of distinguishing epizootic from enzootic varieties of subtype 1 Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruses in a rapid indirect immunofluorescence assay. J Clin Microbiol 35(7): 1887–90.
- 10. Greiser-Wilke IM, Moenning V, Kaaden OR, Figueiredo LT (1989) Most alphaviruses share a conserved epitopic region on their nucleocapsid protein. J Gen Virol 3: 743–748.
- 11. Greiser-Wilke IM, Moennig M, Kaaden OR, Shope RE (1991) Detection of Alphaviruses in a genus-specific antigen capture enzyme immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 29: 131–137.
- 12. Kirsch MI, Hülseweh B, Nacke C, Rülker T, Schirrmann T, et al. (2008) Development of human antibody fragments using antibody phage display for the detection and diagnosis of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV). BMC Biotechnol 8: 66.
- 13. Duggan JM, Coates DM, Ulaeto DO (2001) Isolation of single-chain antibody fragments against Venezualan Equine Encephalomyelitis virus from two different immune sources. Viral Immunol 14: 263–273.
- 14. Hu WG, Alvi AZ, Fulton RE, Suresh MR, Nagata LP (2002) Genetic engineering of streptavidin-binding peptide tagged single-chain variable fragment antibody to Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Hybrid Hybridomics 21(6): 415–420.
- 15. Hu WG, Thompson HG, Alvi AZ, Nagata LP, Suresh MR, et al. (2004) Development of immunofiltration assay by light addressable potentiometric sensor with genetically biotinylated recombinant antibody for rapid identification of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. J Immunol Methods 289(1–2): 27–35.
- 16. Marschall HJ, Setzke M, Voß L (1995) Ringversuche Arbovirus-Testsystem, Teil 1, Testoptimierung. Defence R&D Germany, Technical Report EC1055.
- 17. Marschall HJ, Setzke M, Voß L (1996) Arbovirus-Testsystem, Arbeiten zur Einführung eines gruppenspezifischen ELISA zum Nachweis der Alphaviren, Teil 1, Testoptimierung. Defence R&D Germany, Technical Report EC1178–EC1179.
- 18. Huelseweh B, Ehricht R, Marschall HJ (2006) A simple and rapid protein array based method for the simultaneous detection of biowarfare agents. Proteomics 6(10): 2972–2981.
- 19. Ehricht R, Adelhelm K, Monecke S, Huelseweh B (2009) Application of Protein ArrayTubes to Bacteria, Toxin and Biological Warfare Agent Detection. In: Microchip Methods in Diagnostics. Bilitewski, U (Ed), Springer, New York, USA 509: 85–105.
- 20. Dai X, Fulton RE, Hilsen R, Hu WG, Ranches J (2008) Rapid and sensitive detection of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Defence R&D Canada, Technical Report, DRDC Suffield TR2008–050.
- 21. Berge TO, Gleiser CA, Gochenour WS , Miesse ML, et al. (1961) Studies on the virus of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis. II. Modification by specific immune serum of response of central nervous system of mice. J Immunol 87: 509–517.
- 22. Pratt WD, Davis NL, Johnston RE, Smith JF (2003) Genetically engineered, live attenuated vaccines for Venezuelan equine encephalitis: testing in animal models. Vaccine 21: 3854–3862.
- 23. Martin SS, Bakken RR, Lind CM, Garcia P, Jenkins E, et al. (2010) Evaluation of formalin inactivated V3526 virus with adjuvant as a next generation vaccine candidate for Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Vaccine 28: 3143–3151.
- 24. McKinney RW, Berge TO, Sawyer WD, Tigertt WD, Crozier D (1963) Use of an attenuated strain of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus for immunization in man. Am J Trop Med 12(4): 597–603.
- 25. McKinney RW (1972) Inactivated and live VEE vaccines - A review. pp. 369–389. PAHO Scientific Publication: Proc of the workshop symposium on Venezuelan Encephalitis.
- 26. Pittmann PR, Makuch RS, Mangiafico JA, Cannon TL, Gibbs PH, et al. (1996) Long-term duration of detectable neutralizing antibodies after administration of live-attenuated VEE vaccine and following booster vaccination with inactivated VEE vaccine. Vaccine 14(4): 337–43.
- 27. Phillpotts RJ, Wright AJ (1999) TC-83 vaccine protects against airborne or subcutaneous challenge with heterologous mouse-virulent strains of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Vaccine 17(7–8): 982–988.
- 28. Alevizatos AC, McKinney RW, Feigin RD (1967) Live attenuated Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus vaccine. I.Clinical effects in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg 16: 762–768.
- 29. Casamassima AC, Hess LW, Marty A (1987) TC-83 Venezuelan equine encephalitis vaccine exposure during pregnancy. Teratology 36: 287–289.
- 30. Eddy GA, Martin DH, Reeves WC, Johnson KM (1972) Field studies of an attenuated Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis vaccine strain TC-83. Infect Immun 5(2): 160–163.
- 31. Rayfield EJ, Gorelkin L, Curnow RT, Jahrling PB (1976) Virus-induced pancreatic disease by Venezuelan encephalitis virus. Alterations in glucose tolerance and insulin release. Diabetes 25: 623–631.
- 32. Bennett AM, Elvin SJ, Wright AJ, Jones SM, Phillpotts RJ (2001) An immunological profile of BALB/c mice protected from airborne challenge following vaccination with a live attenuated Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus vaccine. Vaccine 19: 337–347.
- 33. USDA Animal Welfare Act (AWA), 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq., as amended and Health Research Extension Act of 1985 (“Animals in Research”), Public Law 99–158.
- 34. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council (1996)
- 35. Sagripanti JL, Hülseweh B, Grote G, Voß L, Böhling K, et al. (2011) Microbial Inactivation for Safe and Rapid Diagnostics of Biological Threat Agents. Applied Environmental Micobiology 77(20): 7289–7295.
- 36. Phillpotts RJ (2006) Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus complex-specific monoclonal antibody provides broad protection, in murine models, against airborne challenge with viruses from serogroups I, II and III. Virus Research 120: 107–112.
- 37. O'Brien LM, Underwood-Fowler CD, Goodchild SA, Phelps AL, Phillpotts RJ (2009) Development of a novel monoclonal antibody with reactivity to a wide range of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus strains. Virol J 6: 206.
- 38. Spearman C (1908) The method of right and wrong cases (constat stimuli) without Gauss formulae. Brit J Psychol 2: 227.
- 39. Kaerber G (1931) Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 162: 480.
- 40. Hamilton MA, Russo RC, Thurston RV (1977) “Trimmed Spearman-Karber Method for Estimating Median Lethal Concentrations in Toxicity Bioassays,” Environ Sci Technol 11(7): 714–719.
- 41. Pelat T, Hust M, Thullier P (2009) Obtention and engineering of non-human primate (NHP) antibodies for therapeutics. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 14: 1633–1638.
- 42. Pelat T, Hust M, Hale M, Lefranc MP, Dübel S, et al. (2009) Isolation of a human-like antibody fragment (scFv) that neutralizes ricin biological activity. BMC Biotechnol 9: 60.
- 43. Pelat T, Hust M, Laffly E, Condemine F, Bottex C, et al. (2007) High-affinity, human antibody-like antibody fragment (single-chain variable fragment) neutralizing the lethal factor (LF) of Bacillus anthracis by inhibiting protective antigen-LF complex formation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 2758–2764.
- 44. Hust M, Toleikis L, Dübel S (2007) Antibody phage display. In: Weinheim DübelS, editor. Handbook of therapeutic antibodies. Willey-VCH. pp. 45–68. Edited by.
- 45. Hust M, Meyer T, Voedisch B, Rülker T, Thie H, et al. (2011) A human scFv antibody generation pipeline for proteome research. Journal of Biotechnology 152: 159–170.
- 46. Sambrook J, Fritsch , EF , Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, vol. I. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor: Laboratory Press.
- 47. Rondot S, Koch J, Breitling F, Dübel S (2001) A helper phage to improve single-chain antibody presentation in phage display. Nat Biotech 19: 75–78.
- 48. Soltes G, Hust M, Ng KKY, Bansal A, Field J, et al. (2007) On the influence of vector design on antibody phage display. Journal Biotechnology 127: 626–637.
- 49. Schirrman T, Hust M (2010) Construction of human antibody gene libraries and selection of antibodies by phage display. Methods Mol. Biol 651: 177–209.
- 50. Kirsch M, Zaman M, Meier D, Dübel S, Hust M (2005) Parameters affecting the display of antibodies on phage. Journal of Immunological Methods 301: 173–185.
- 51. Henchal EA, Gentry MK, McCown JM, Brandt WE (1982) Dengue virus-specific and flavivirus group determinants identified with monoclonal antibodies by indirect immuno-fluorescence. Am J Trop Med Hyg 31: 830–836.
- 52. Mollova S, Retter I, Hust M, Dübel S, Müller W (2010) Analysis of single chain antibody sequences using the VBASE2 Fab Analysis Tool. In: Kontermann R, Dübel S, editors. Antibody engineering Vol 2. Springer-Verlag. pp. 3–10.
- 53. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685.
- 54. Jensen H (1981) Detection of antibodies against hog cholera virus and bovine viral diarrhea virus in porcine serum. A comparative examination using CF, PLA and NLPA assays. Acta Vet Scand 22: 85–98.
- 55. Roehrig JT, Mathews JH (1985) The neutralization site on the E2 glycoprotein of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis (TC-83) virus is composed of multiple conformationally stable epitopes. Virology 142(2): 347–56.
- 56. May KR (1973) The Collison nebulizer: description, performance and application. Journal of Aerosol Science 4: 235–243.
- 57. Henderson DW (1952) An apparatus for the study of airborne infection. Journal of Hygiene 50: 53–68.
- 58. Wright AJ, Phillpotts RJ (1998) Humane endpoints are an objective measure of morbidity in Venezuelan encephalomyelitis virus infection of mice. Archives of Virology 143: 1155–1162.
- 59. Thullier P, Huish O, Pelat T, Martin AC (2010) The humanness of macaque antibody sequences. J Mol Biol 396(5): 1439–50.
- 60. Murphy KM, Travers P, Walport M (2009) Janeway's Immunology. 7th ed., Garland Science, Taylor & Francis Group.
- 61. Hunt AR, Frederickson S, Hinkel C, Bowdish KS, Roehrig JT (2006) A humanised murine monoclonal antibody protects mice either before or after challenge with virulent Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus. J Gen Virol 87: 2467–2476.
- 62. Hunt AR, Richard A, Bowen B, Fredericksonc S, Maruyamad T, et al. (2011) Treatment of mice with human monoclonal antibody 24 h after lethal aerosol challenge with virulent Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus prevents disease but not infection. Virology 414: 146–152.
- 63. Roehrig JT, Day JW, Kinney RM (1982) Antigenic analysis of the surface glycoproteins of a Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus (TC-83) using monoclonal antibodies. Virology 118(2): 269–78.
- 64. Steele KE, Twenhafel NA (2010) Pathology of animal models of alphavirus encephalitis. Vet Pathol 47(5): 790–805.
- 65. Charles PC, Trgovcich J, Davis NL, Johnston RE (2001) Immunopathogenesis and immune modulation of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus-induced disease in the mouse. Virology 284(2): 190–202.
- 66. Charles PC, Walters E, Margolis F, Johnston RE (1995) Mechanism of neuroinvasion of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus in the mouse. Virology 208(2): 662–671.
- 67. Luers AJ, Adams SD, Smalley JV, Campanella JJ (2005) A phylogenomic study of the genus Alphavirus employing whole genome comparison. Comp Funct Genomics 6(4): 217–227.
- 68. Goodchild SA, O'Brien LM, Steven J, Muller MR, Lanning OJ, et al. (2011) A humanised murine monoclonal antibody with broad serogroup specificity protects mice from challenge with Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Antiviral Res 90(1): 1–8.
- 69. Hu WG, Phelps AL, Jager S, Chau D, Hu CC, et al. (2010) A recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody completely protects mice against lethal challenge with Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Vaccine 28: 5558–5564.
- 70. De Mucha-Macias J, Sanchez-Spindola I (1965) Two human cases of laboratory infection with Mucambo virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 14(3): 475–478.
- 71. Dietz WH, Peralta PH, Johnson KM (1979) Ten clinical cases of human infection with Venezuelan Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus, Dubtype ID. Am J Trop Med Hyg 28(2): 329–332.
- 72. McCurdy K, Joyce J, Hamilton S, Nevins C, Sosna W, et al. (2011) Differential accumulation of genetic and phenotypic changes in Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus and Japanese encephalitis virus following passage in vitro and in vivo. Virology 415(1): 20–29.
- 73. Wust CJ, Nicholas JA, Fredin D, Dodd DC, Brideau RJ, et al. (1989) Monoclonal antibodies that cross-react with the E1 glycoprotein of different alphavirus serogroups: characterization including passive protection in vivo. Virus Res 13(2): 101–112.
- 74. Phillpotts RJ, Wright AJ (1999) TC-83 vaccine protects against airborne or subcutaneous challenge with heterologous mouse-virulent strains of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Vaccine 17(7–8): 982–988.
- 75. Hunt AR, Frederickson S, Maruyama T, Roehrig JT, Blair CD (2010) The first human epitope map of the alphaviral E1 and E2 proteins reveals a new E2 epitope with significant virus neutralizing activity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4(7): 739.
- 76. Mathews JH, Roehrig JT, Trent DW (1985) Role of complement and the Fc portion of immunoglobulin G in immunity to Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus infection with glycoprotein-specific monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Virology 55: 594–600.
- 77. Wust CJ, Crombie R, Brown A (1987) Passive protection across subgroups of alphaviruses by hyperimmune non-cross-neutralizing anti-Sindbis serum. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 184(1): 56–63.
- 78. Schmaljohn AL, Johnson ED, Dalrymple JM, Cole GA (1982) Non-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies can prevent lethal alphavirus encephalitis. Nature 297: 70–72.
- 79. Phillpotts RJ, Jones LD, Howard SC (2002) Monoclonal antibody protects mice against infection and disease when given either before or up to 24 h after airborne challenge with virulent Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Vaccine 20(11–12): 1497–504.
- 80. Parker MD, Buckley MJ, Melanson VR, Glass PJ, Norwood D, et al. (2010) Antibody to the E3 glycoprotein protects mice against lethal venezuelan equine encephalitis virus infection. J Virol 84: 12683–12690.
- 81. Pelat T, Thullier P (2009) Non-human primate immune libraries combined with germline humanization: an (almost) new and powerful approach for the isolation of therapeutic antibodies. MAbs 1(4): 377–81.
- 82. Pelat T, Bedouelle H, Rees AR, Crennell SJ, Lefranc MP, et al. (2008) Germline humanization of a non-human Primate antibody that neutralizes the anthrax toxin, by in vitro and in silico engineering. J Mol Biol 384: 1400–1407.