Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Functional Differences in Visceral and Subcutaneous Fat Pads Originate from Differences in the Adipose Stem Cell

  • Silvana Baglioni ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Silvana Baglioni, Giulia Cantini

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Giulia Cantini ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Silvana Baglioni, Giulia Cantini

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Giada Poli,

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Michela Francalanci,

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Roberta Squecco,

    Affiliation Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Alessandra Di Franco,

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Elisa Borgogni,

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Salvatore Frontera,

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Gabriella Nesi,

    Affiliation Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Francesco Liotta,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Marcello Lucchese,

    Affiliation General and Vascular Surgery, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy

  • Giuliano Perigli,

    Affiliation Department of General Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Fabio Francini,

    Affiliation Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Gianni Forti,

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • Mario Serio,

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  •  [ ... ],
  • Michaela Luconi

    Affiliation Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Functional Differences in Visceral and Subcutaneous Fat Pads Originate from Differences in the Adipose Stem Cell

  • Silvana Baglioni, 
  • Giulia Cantini, 
  • Giada Poli, 
  • Michela Francalanci, 
  • Roberta Squecco, 
  • Alessandra Di Franco, 
  • Elisa Borgogni, 
  • Salvatore Frontera, 
  • Gabriella Nesi, 
  • Francesco Liotta


Metabolic pathologies mainly originate from adipose tissue (AT) dysfunctions. AT differences are associated with fat-depot anatomic distribution in subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral omental (VAT) pads. We address the question whether the functional differences between the two compartments may be present early in the adipose stem cell (ASC) instead of being restricted to the mature adipocytes. Using a specific human ASC model, we evaluated proliferation/differentiation of ASC from abdominal SAT-(S-ASC) and VAT-(V-ASC) paired biopsies in parallel as well as the electrophysiological properties and functional activity of ASC and their in vitro-derived adipocytes. A dramatic difference in proliferation and adipogenic potential was observed between the two ASC populations, S-ASC having a growth rate and adipogenic potential significantly higher than V-ASC and giving rise to more functional and better organized adipocytes. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive electrophysiological analysis of ASC and derived-adipocytes, showing electrophysiological properties, such as membrane potential, capacitance and K+-current parameters which confirm the better functionality of S-ASC and their derived adipocytes. We document the greater ability of S-ASC-derived adipocytes to secrete adiponectin and their reduced susceptibility to lipolysis. These features may account for the metabolic differences observed between the SAT and VAT. Our findings suggest that VAT and SAT functional differences originate at the level of the adult ASC which maintains a memory of its fat pad of origin. Such stem cell differences may account for differential adipose depot susceptibility to the development of metabolic dysfunction and may represent a suitable target for specific therapeutic approaches.


Metabolic pathologies can originate from white adipose tissue dysfunctions. This organ can no longer be referred to as a mere energy storage site since it has been demonstrated to also display pivotal endocrine functions through the secretion of specific hormones called adipokines. Functional differences in the adipose tissue and the impact of its dysfunction on metabolism is associated with the regional distribution of fat depots, in particular subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral (VAT) adipose tissues [1]. Epidemiological studies highlighted that VAT accumulation associates with an increased metabolic risk and overall mortality [2], [3], whereas SAT expansion ameliorates insulin sensitivity and decreases type 2 diabetes risk [4]. Notably, in the mouse, SAT rather than VAT transplantation in either subcutaneous or visceral depots decreases circulating insulin and glucose levels, resulting in an improvement of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity [5], [6], suggesting that adipose tissue depots maintain an intrinsic memory of their site of origin.

Human adult adipose stem cell (ASC) populations have recently been characterized in parallel by paired biopsies from subcutaneous (S-ASC) and visceral omental (V-ASC) adipose tissue [7], representing a valuable cell model for the in vitro study of early events and processes occurring in the adipose tissue from different anatomical sites. Differences in gene expression and biological responses have been described in adipocytes and preadipocytes of the two adipose compartments [8][11]. In the present study, by the use of this specific model of human adult ASC cultures obtained from paired abdominal SAT and VAT biopsies, we address the question whether the functional differences observed between these tissues may be present early in the adipose stem cell which retains the memory of its fat pad of origin. In particular, we compare morphologic properties, proliferation activity, and adipogenic potential of the paired ASC populations and the functional properties of their in vitro-derived adipocytes. Previous electrophysiological studies have shown that preadipocytes and adipocytes express K+ channels [12], [13] and increasing evidence has pointed toward a functional relationship between resting membrane potential (RMP), K+ channel type expression and cell functions such as proliferation and differentiation [14][17]. The principal ion currents found in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs) [18], [19] and in ASC [7], [20] are two types of delayed-rectifier K+ currents (IK,DR): a noisy current showing a rapid activation/slow inactivation (IKr) which probably corresponds to the Ca2+-activated, large conductance K+ current (IBK or Maxi K+ current) and a slow activating K+ current named IKs. The expression of the total K+ current of delayed rectifier (KDR) channels supporting these currents changes during the cell cycle and decreases during commitment and differentiation. In contrast, during these processes, there is a parallel increase in the size of the inward-rectifier K+ current (IKir) and the cells become progressively more hyperpolarized [16]. The voltage threshold for IKDR activation in stem cells is at a less depolarized potential compared to the resting membrane potential, RMP. This indicates that in ASC the RMP is maintained predominantly by the Na+/K+ ATP-ase pump and ion transporters with a small contribution of KDR channels. Conversely, in differentiating cells the progressive increased expression of Kir channels contributes to RMP maintenance. Notably, blockade of K+ channels reduces stem cell proliferation [13]. Here, we evaluated the modulation of the passive electrophysiological properties and K+ current types occurring in ASC during the process of differentiation as well as the putative differences characterizing ASC and the corresponding in vitro-derived adipocytes according to the adipose tissue of origin.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Adipose tissue samples were obtained, following written informed consent, from 18 subjects undergoing intra-abdominal laparoscopic surgery at AOU Careggi Hospital [7]. All the protocols have been approved by the Local Ethical Committee of AOU Careggi Hospital (CEL).


Adipose tissue samples were obtained from 18 subjects [9 females and 9 males: mean age ± SD: 60±18 yrs, 20–78 yrs; BMI 26.4±3.2 kg/m2, 20.2–29.5 kg/m2), undergoing intra-abdominal surgery. A total of 27 paired S-ASC and V-ASC populations have been obtained from stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of this cohort. We excluded all subjects affected by type 2 diabetes, cancer, infections, inflammation or taking thiazolidinediones or steroids.

Isolation and culture of human adipose-derived stem cells from SAT and VAT

Cell isolation was performed as described [7] from adipose tissue biopsies obtained by laparoscopic surgery (4–6 gr). Briefly, under sterile conditions, adipose tissue samples were immediately placed in serum free (SF) Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/F12 supplemented with 200 µg/ml streptomycin and 200 U/ml penicillin. Adipose tissue biopsies were washed in PBS, then minced and digested with 1 mg/ml collagenase type I in PBS for 1 hour at 37°C in a shaking water bath. The pellet was collected by centrifugation at 650×g for 10 minutes and then treated with red blood cell lysis buffer (155 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA) for 10 minutes at room temperature. After centrifugation, the cellular pellet was filtered through a 100 µm mesh filter to remove debris. The filtrate was centrifuged and the obtained stromal vascular fraction (SVF) was plated onto 100 mm cell culture dishes in complete culture medium (DMEM containing 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 µg/ml amphotericin-B). Cells were cultured at 37°C in humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. After 24 hours non-adherent cells were removed and adherent cells were washed twice with PBS. Confluent cells were trypsinized and expanded in T75 flasks (passage 1, P1). A confluent and homogeneous fibroblast-like cell population was obtained after 2–3 weeks of cultures. In all the experiments, only cells at early culture passages were used (P1–P3) after an overnight serum lowering from 20 to 5%. Each experiment was performed at least 3 times.

In vitro cell differentiation

For adipogenic differentiation, ASC were cultured in 10% FBS-DMEM, 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 1 µM dexamethasone, 200 µM indomethacin and 10 µM insulin for 2 weeks, then shifted to 10% FBS-DMEM containing 1.7 µM insulin for another week [7], [21]. Adipogenic differentiation was demonstrated with Oil Red O or AdipoRed staining. For osteogenic differentiation, ASC were cultured in 10% FBS-DMEM, 0.1 µM dexamethasone, 50 µM ascorbate-2-phosphate, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate for 3 weeks [7], [21]. Osteogenic differentiation was demonstrated with Alizarin Red S staining.

Cell dimension evaluation

Cell dimension analysis was performed by Scepter Handheld Automated Cell Counter (cat # PHCC00000, Millipore, Billerica, MA) in trypsinized cells resuspended at the appropriate concentration and obtained from 3 different subjects. Cell dimension distributions were generated by manually gating the different peaks and the cell concentrations recorded using Scepter Software 1.2. At least 2×105 cells in duplicate were analyzed for each sample.

ASC proliferation Assays


A 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-based ELISA kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. Non confluent cells were incubated with 10 μM BrdU for 6 hours and absorbance was measured at 450 nm with a reference wavelength at 490 nm.

Cell count.

Seeded cells were counted in haemocytometer every day. Mean cell number was obtained by counting 6 replicates for each point in each experiment. Dead cells were excluded by trypan blue staining.

MTS assay.

Plated ASC were analyzed every day by MTS assay according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each experimental point was performed in five replicates in 6 independent experiments.

PD evaluation.

Confluent ASC (passage 0) were counted in haemocytometer and re-plated at the same initial density. The number of population doublings (PD) was calculated as n of PD = log2 (Ni/No) (Ni = number of cells yielded; No = number of cells plated). Results were plotted according to the following equation: PD(n) = PD(n−1)+PD(n).


Immunocytochemical analysis with mouse anti-human Ki-67 antibody was performed on ethanol fixed/0.1% Triton-X permeabilized ASC with the Ventana Benchmark XT system (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ). Ki-67 positive nuclei were counted on at least 100 cells. Negative controls were performed by omitting the primary antibody.

RNA isolation and quantitative real time RT-PCR

RNA isolation and quantitative real time RT-PCR were performed as detailed elsewhere [7] using the primers/probes for the indicated genes (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). The amount of target, normalized to GAPDH and relative to a calibrator, used as positive control, was given by 2-ΔΔCt calculation.

Lipid content quantification

The intracellular lipid content was measured by AdipoRed™ assay according to the manufacturer's instructions (Cambrex, MA). After 21 day differentiation, AdipoRed was added and fluorescence emission measured by 485/572 nm excitation/emission. Specific absorbance of differentiated adipocytes was calculated as fold increase on the non specific absorbance of the corresponding ASC samples in V- and S-populations. Each point was carried out in quadruplicate in 2 separate differentiation experiments performed with cells obtained from 5 different subjects.

Lipolysis assay

In vitro-differentiated adipocytes treated with AdipoRed to stain intracellular lipids were incubated for additional 12 hours in insulin- and phenol red-free medium, in the presence or absence of 1 µM isoproterenol. Both isoproterenol-stimulated and basal lipolytic activity of S- and V-ADIPO was evaluated as the decrease in intracellular triglyceride content, and expressed as mean percentage of AdipoRed absorbance decrease normalized to the initial AdipoRed content, after subtracting the non specific ASC mean absorbance. Each point was carried out in quadruplicate in 2 separate differentiation experiments performed with cells obtained from 4 different subjects.

Immunofluorescence cytochemistry

ASC grown on glass coverslips were subjected to adipose differentiation and fixation/permeabilization. Serum blocked coverslips were incubated with anti-FABP4 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) followed by FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody. Fluorescence was acquired with a Leica DM4000 epifluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Negative controls (not shown) were performed avoiding primary antibodies.

Western Blot Analysis

Thirty µg of proteins extracted from ASC, adipocytes and SAT/VAT, separated by reducing SDS-PAGE (10% and 15% acrylamide/bis acrylamide percentage for actin/adiponectin and FABP4 analysis, respectively) and transferred to PVDF membranes, were probed with primary antibodies (FABP4 and actin, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany; adiponectin, Vinci Biochem, Vinci, Italy) followed by peroxidase-secondary IgG. Image acquisition was performed with ChemiDoc XRS instrument (BIO-RAD Labs, Segrate, Italy).

Adiponectin ELISA measurement

Confluent ASC were differentiated with the adipogenic medium. Conditioned media collected at 2 differentiation time points (14 and 21 days) were analyzed with DuoSet ELISA kit for adiponectin detection (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Each point was performed at least in quadruplicates on cells obtained from 4 different subjects.

Flow Cytometry Analysis

Cell immunophenotypical analysis of ASC was performed by using the FITC-, PE- or APC-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against different surface antigens and their respective isotype controls (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). At least 104 cells were acquired from each sample and analyzed by flow cytometry (BDLSR II, BD Biosciences) using the BD DIVA and CellQuest software.

Cytogenetic analysis of ASC

Preconfluent ASC were treated with Colcemid and hypotonic solution. Metaphases were prepared from cold ethanol/acetic acid (3∶1)–fixed cells staining slides with Trypsin-Giemsa (GTG-banded karyotype). At least 20 metaphase cells were analyzed. Results were scored by Chantal software equipped microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany).


The electrophysiological properties of voltage-gated K+ currents of cultured V- and S-ASC, and V- and S-ADIPO were investigated on glass coverslip-adherent single cells by the whole-cell patch-clamp technique [7], using voltage-clamp and current-clamp modes. The electrode junction potential was evaluated before making the patch and was subtracted from the recorded intracellular potential. All experiments were carried in control physiological solution (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM D-glucose and 10 mM HEPES) with the K+ channel blocker 4-aminopyridine, 4-AP (2 mM) or tetraethylammonium, TEA (20 mM), to avoid the occurrence of the transient outward potassium current Ito and with Nifedipine (10 µM) to block L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L). The standard solution to fill the electropipettes contained 100 mM potassium glutamate, 35 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES and 5 mM EGTA; pH was adjusted to 7.2 and had tip resistances of 2–3 MΩ. To record IK,DR only, BaCl2 (0.4 mM) was added to the external solution to block IKir and to evaluate the presence of IBK and IKs, we used iberiotoxin, Ibtx (100 nM) and chromanol, Chr (50 µM), respectively. The RMP was evaluated in current-clamp mode. The delayed-rectifier K+ current (IK,DR) was recorded in voltage-clamp mode by applying voltage steps in 10 mV increments from −80 to50 mV with holding potential (HP) of −60 mV to block Na+ current (INa) and T-type Ca2+ current (ICa,T). Linear leak, voltage independent ionic currents and capacitive currents were withdrawn on-line using the P/4 procedure. To this end, the pClamp9 program applied 8 negative sub-pulses with voltage 4 fold lower than the test voltage at a HP of −60 mV in order to elicit only linear leak, voltage independent ionic currents and capacitive currents. The average of the currents generated by the sub-pulses were subtracted on-line from the test currents.

The occurrence of the Kir current was assessed in voltage-clamp by recording the currents in response to voltage ramps ranging from −120 to 50 mV over a period of 0.5 seconds, which were imposed every 1 minute from a holding potential of −60 mV and digitized at a rate of 5 kHz; two runs repeated every 20 seconds were averaged. First, we used the control physiological solution without Ba2+ (Control) to record any K+ current (IK,DR and IKir) followed by Ba2+ addition to block IKir. Finally, the average of two ramps elicited in the presence of Ba2+ was subtracted from control currents to evaluate IKir.

The Cm value was considered as an index of the cell surface area assuming that membrane-specific capacitance is constant at 1 μF/cm2. To allow comparison of test current recorded from different cells, the resting membrane conductance, Gm, was normalized to Cm, Gm/Cm (in nS/pF). The current amplitudes (I) were normalized to cell linear capacitance (Cm) to allow comparison of test currents recorded from different cells. The ratio I/Cm is then proposed as current density. For RMP evaluation the small (2–5 mV) liquid junction potential was corrected. The patch pipette was connected to a micromanipulator (Narishige International USA) and an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments, USA). Voltage-clamp protocol generation and data acquisition were controlled by using an output and an input of the A/D−D/A interfaces (Digidata 1200; Axon Instruments, USA) and pClamp9 software (Axon Instruments, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to verify data normal distribution. Student's t test was applied for statistical analysis of two classes of data. Non parametric distributions were analyzed using Wilcoxon test. A P<0.05 was considered significant. Data are expressed as mean ± SE or elsewhere indicated.


Differences in cell proliferation

When the ability of ASC to proliferate in vitro was evaluated, a statistically significant difference in the proliferation rate between the two paired populations was observed. In particular, the growth rate was significantly higher in S-ASC than in V-ASC, as evaluated by cell counting (Fig. 1A) and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation (Fig. 1B) and confirmed by Ki-67 immunostaining (Fig. 1D). Moreover, the metabolic profile, evaluated by the MTS method, was significantly different between the two populations, with S-ASC being more active than V-ASC (Fig. 1C). Population doubling calculated over 2 months of cell growth showed a significant diversion of the two curves starting from passage 3 (each passage corresponding to 1 week of culture, Fig. 1E). In order to exclude any potential transforming effect on ASC populations due to long term in vitro culture, we analyzed both cell immunophenotype and karyotype in long culture populations. Compared to early passage (P3), no significant alteration in cell immunophenotype was detectable in the same ASC population cultured up to P12 (Fig. 1F). The normal cell karyotype of this P12 population is shown in Fig. 1G.

Figure 1. Different proliferation rate in S-ASC and V-ASC.

Growth curves were obtained for each population by haemocytometer cell counting (A), evaluation of BrdU incorporation (B), and MTS assay (C) at each time point. Results are expressed as mean ± SE fold increase of cell counts (A), BrdU (B) and MTS absorbance (C) at each time point over day 1 in at least 4 ASC populations derived from at least 4 independent subjects. *P<0.001 versus respective day 1; §§P<0.01, §§§P<0.001 S- versus V-ASC at the corresponding time point. (D) Ki-67 proliferation index is calculated as mean ± SE percentage of positive cells counted in at least 20 fields for each slide. 4 ASC populations were obtained from 4 different subjects, *P<0.001 versus the corresponding V-ASC population. (E) Population doubling (PD) curves were obtained by cell counting at different passages of S-ASC and V-ASC cultures expanded for about 2 months. Results are expressed as mean ± SE PD numbers obtained by counting cells in triplicates from 3 independent subjects; *P<0.001, versus respective passage 0; §P<0.05, §§§P<0.001 versus the corresponding V-ASC. (F) Immunophenotype of V-ASC obtained at 2 different passages (P3 and 12). Data correspond to mean ± SE FACScan percentage of positive cells for the indicated surface markers previously demonstrated to characterize ASC populations (7); cells were obtained from n = 2 independent subjects. Similar data were obtained for the corresponding S-ASC at the same passage. No statistically significant differences have been observed in the expression of the indicated markers between the two passages. (G) Representative karyotype analysis of V-ASC at passage 12, corresponding to about 3 months of culture. Similar data has been obtained for the corresponding S-ASC at the same passage, in 2 different subjects. Karyotype analysis was performed on ASC obtained from 2 different subjects.

The in vitro and in vivo maintenance of progenitor and stem cell activity mainly depends on the expression of the polycomb gene bmi-1 [22], [23]. Quantitative real time RT-PCR of BMI-1 expression (Fig. 2A) showed that S-ASC exhibits a significantly higher expression of this polycomb gene which is involved in the regulation of cell cycle and senescence in the haematopoietic compartment [24]. Conversely, no difference in the expression of the two embryonic stemness markers NANOG (Fig. 2B) and OCT-4 (Fig. 2C) was detectable in ASC, suggesting a similar undifferentiated state between the 2 populations. Interestingly, in vitro-induced adipogenic differentiation was accompanied by a decrease in NANOG (Fig. 2B) and OCT-4 (Fig. 2C) expression, while BMI-1 (Fig. 2A) significantly decreased in adipocytes derived from S-ASC only, remaining constant in induced-V-ASC.

Figure 2. Stemness marker expression in S-ASC and V-ASC.

Quantitative Real Time RT-PCR was performed on mRNA extracted from both S- and V-ASC and from the corresponding in vitro-differentiated adipocytes, to evaluate BMI-1, (A, n = 10 subjects) NANOG (B, n = 5 subjects) and OCT-4 (C, n = 5 subjects) expression. Data are expressed as the mean±SE gene expression versus the housekeeping GAPDH gene. °P<0.001 S- versus V-ASC and *P<0.05 adipocytes versus respective ASC.

No expression of human telomere reverse transcriptase (hTERT) associated with telomearase activity was detectable in either S- or V-ASC (not shown).

Differences in differentiation potential

BMI-1 expression differences between V-ASC and S-ASC prompted us to investigate ASC differentiation potential. Previously, we demonstrated that V-ASC and S-ASC cultures in vitro are able to differentiate towards specific lineages when maintained in the appropriate inductive media [7], confirming the multipotency of these stem populations. Following 3 weeks of in vitro-induced adipogenic differentiation, dark (Fig 3A,I) and bright (Fig 3E,M) field microscopy as well as Oil Red O staining (Fig 3B,F,J,N) and AdipoRed fluorescence microscopy (Fig 3C,D,K,L) showed a qualitatively higher number of well differentiated adipocytes in induced S-ASC compared to induced V-ASC, which also presented smaller and less well defined intracellular lipid droplets.

Figure 3. Staining of intracellular triglyceride depots in adipocytes obtained from in vitro differentiation of S- and V-ASC.

Dark (A,I; 5× magnification) and bright field (E,M, G,O,H,P; 40× magnification) microscopy, ORO staining of neutral lipids (B,J; 5× magnification; F,N; 40× magnification) and fluorescence microscopy (40× magnification) of in vitro-differentiated S- (C) and V- (K) adipocytes and of the corresponding S- (D) and V- (L) ASC stained with AdipoRed evidentiate a qualitative higher number of lipid droplets and a higher number of differentiated adipocytes in the S- compared to V- populations. No staining was present in ASC, confirming the high specificity of AdipoRed binding to triglycerides. Representative of cell populations obtained at least from n = 4 different subjects.

Expression of early genes involved in adipocyte differentiation, such as PPARgamma, revealed a statistically significant higher expression in adipocytes derived from S-ASC compared to V-ASC (Fig. 4A). Similar results have been obtained for late differentiation markers such as FABP4 (Fig. 4B) and adiponectin (Fig. 4C). Western Blot analysis of cell lysates confirmed that adipocytes induced from S-ASC synthesize more adiponectin (Fig. 4D, upper panel) and FABP4 (Fig. 4D, lower panel). This latter protein, which is involved in fatty acid transport inside the cell, is functionally located around intracellular lipid droplets, as shown by immunocytochemistry of in vitro-differentiated adipocytes from S-ASC (Fig. 4E, upper panel) and V-ASC (Fig. 4E, lower panel). To further confirm that S-ASC possess a higher adipogenic potential, we evaluated the ability of both V-ASC and S-ASC to accumulate triglycerides intracellularly during in vitro-induced adipogenesis. Quantitative AdipoRed staining confirmed a statistically significant higher level of intracellular lipid accumulation in adipocyte populations differentiated from S-ASC versus V-ASC (Fig. 4F). Conversely, a significantly higher β-adrenergic lipolytic activity was detectable in differentiated V-ADIPO populations compared to the corresponding S-ADIPO, as measured by AdipoRed staining of the remaining intracellular triglycerides following 12 hour treatment with 1 µM isoproterenol (Fig. 4F). Finally, we measured the ability of in vitro-differentiated adipocytes to actively secrete adiponectin as a marker of functional differentiation. Adiponectin concentrations were significantly higher in conditioned media of S-ADIPO compared to V-ADIPO at both differentiation time points (Fig. 4G). Moreover, adiponectin secretion time-dependently increased in both populations, but in particular in S-ADIPO, according to the level of adipocyte maturity, supporting the conclusion that the in vitro differentiation process functionally resembles in vivo physiological adipogenesis (Fig. 4G).

Figure 4. Differences in adipogenic potential and functional capabilities in ASC and in their in vitro-derived adipocytes.

Expression of the adipogenic genes PPARgamma (A), FABP4 (B) and adiponectin (C) evaluated by quantitative real time RT-PCR is higher in S- compared to derived V-ADIPO. Data are expressed by box charts of gene expression ratio versus GAPDH (C) or fold increase between adipocytes and ASC (A, B). Boxes indicate the 25th (lower) and 75th (upper) percentiles. Horizontal lines and dots in the boxes indicate the 50th percentile value (median) and mean value, respectively. Vertical lines give the 10th and 90th percentile limits of the data. Statistical analysis for non-parametric distribution was performed with Wilcoxon text: *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 S- versus V-ADIPO, n = 30 experiments with cells obtained from 14 independent subjects. D: Western Blot analysis of Adiponectin (upper panel) and FABP4 (lower panel) protein expression in ASC compared to the derived adipocytes. Molecular weight (MW) in kDa has been indicated for both standards and proteins of interest. Equal protein loading was verified by probing for the housekeeping protein actin. SAT and VAT samples from the same subject were run as positive controls. Representative of 5 independent experiments performed on cells obtained from 5 subjects. E: Immunofluorescence analysis of FABP4 (left panel) in in vitro-differentiated S-ADIPO (upper panel) and V-ADIPO (lower panel) revealed positivity for the enzyme around the intracellular lipid droplets. Right panels: corresponding bright field microscopy. F: Adipogenic potential of S- and V-ASC has been evaluated as AdipoRed staining of intracellular lipid droplets in the derived adipocytes. Results are expressed as mean ± SE fold increase of AdipoRed absorbance (left axis) in adipocytes versus the corresponding ASC. Lipolytic activity (right axis) of the same adipocytes evaluated as AdipoRed absorbance fold decrease following 12 h treatment with 1 µM isoproterenol. *P<0.001 S- versus V-ADIPO. G: Adiponectin secretion evaluated during in vitro-induced adipogenesis in S- and V-ASC at two different time points (T1 and T2, 14 and 21 days of differentiation respectively) by ELISA adiponectin kit. °P<0.001 T2 versus T1; *P<0.001 S- versus V-ADIPO.

According to their multipotent nature, ASC cells are able to in vitro differentiate toward the osteogenic phenotype when properly stimulated with the appropriate differentiation medium [7]. In order to quantify any putative difference also in the osteogenic potential of the two ASC populations, their osteoblastogenic ability was assessed following 3 weeks of in vitro specific differentiation. S-ASC showed a significantly higher expression of the osteogenic marker RUNX2 compared to V-ASC (mean ± SE RUNX2 fold increase on GAPDH: 27.5±13.0 vs 4.4±0.5, P<0.05, n = 7 populations from 4 subject), confirming a higher osteogenic efficiency rate for S-ASC.

Electrophysiological properties of ASC and in vitro-differentiated adipocytes

Next, we performed a detailed analysis of the electrophysiological properties of ASC and of the derived in vitro-differentiated adipocytes by patch clamp techniques (Fig. 5A–D), which further confirmed functional differences in the two stem and differentiated populations.

Figure 5. ASC and in vitro-differentiated derived adipocytes express two types of delayed rectifier K+ currents.

Light microscopy of a S-ASC (A), V-ASC (B), S-ADIPO (C) and V-ADIPO (D) plated on glass coverslip and impaled by the patch pipette for electrophysiological records (magnification 40X). (E–F) Typical IK,DR trace currents elicited by a voltage step to 50 mV from a holding potential of −60 mV in Control solution with 4-AP (2 mM), Nifedipine (10 µM) and Ba2+(0.1 mM) in S-ASC (Ea), S-ADIPO (Eb), V-ASC (Fa) and V-ADIPO (Fb). In each cell type, IKs traces are obtained in the presence of Ibtx (100 nM) and IBK traces by subtracting IKs from IK,DR. By adding Chr (50 µM) only a very small residual current was recorded (Ibtx+Chr current traces). (G–J) Family of IBK (G and I) and IKs (H and J) family of current traces evaluated as in panels E and F (same cells) from pharmacological dissection with voltage steps of 10 mV increments (from −80 to 50 mV; HP of −60 mV. Note the different ordinate scale in all panels.

The RMP, evaluated by the whole cell patch clamp technique in current-clamp condition, was recorded from V- and S-ASC and from the corresponding in vitro-differentiated adipocytes (V- and S-ADIPO). RMP was significantly more hyperpolarized in S-ASC and S-ADIPO than in V-ASC and V-ADIPO, respectively (Table 1), suggesting that S-ASC were more prone than V-ASC to differentiate towards the adipose phenotype [16].

Table 1. Electrophysiological properties of ASC and of the derived in vitro-differentiated adipocytes.

The whole cell patch clamp technique in voltage clamp mode was used to study the passive properties of both stem and differentiated populations. Electrophysiological measurement of ASC linear capacitance (Cm), which is an indirect index of the cell surface area, provided evidence that V-ASC were larger than S-ASC (Table 1). Dimensional analysis performed by Scepter Handheld Automated Cell Counter (Millipore) on trypsinized ASC, confirmed the significantly greater diameter observed in V-ASC (mean cell diameter: 23.4±4.8 µm V-ASC and 20.5±3.9 µm S-ASC, P<0.005, n = 3 cell populations from 3 different subjects). Adipocytes differentiated from S-ASC increased their Cm and surface compared to the stem cell, in accordance with the functional development of the mature cell (Table 1). Conversely, in vitro-differentiated adipocytes derived from V-ASC displayed a significantly lower Cm compared to the corresponding ASC and were significantly smaller than the corresponding S-ADIPO (Table 1), suggesting that the latter undergo a more functional differentiation process accompanied by a better organized accumulation of intracellular triglycerides. The Gm conductance, an index of resting cell permeability, was higher in V-ASC than in S-ASC, and the same difference was observed upon differentiation, where Gm values were still significantly higher in V- than S-ADIPO (Table 1). The specific cell permeability (Gm/Cm) showed an opposite trend, being reduced in ADIPO with respect to ASC. Such changes were greater in S-ADIPO than in V-ADIPO (65% versus 20% decrease; Table 1). The resting conductance density is related to specific membrane leak and its reduced value is an index of an improved resting membrane obstacle to passive ions fluxes. Thus, the total membrane conductance, Gm, increases with the Cm increase but the relative increase is lower if Gm/Cm is small. This is the case of S-ADIPO respect to V-ADIPO. Accordingly, the Gm value is smaller in the larger S-ADIPO than in the V-ADIPO. Again, this supports a greater differentiation potential of S- compared to V-ASC.

Both ASC and in vitro-derived adipocytes were then assessed for the functional expression of specific K+ currents. Electrophysiological analysis confirmed the mesenchymal nature of these cells, since in Control solution without nifedipine they did not show Na+ and Ca2+ currents but only outwards currents. As these currents were unaffected by Ba2+ and blocked by 20 mM-TEA or 2 mM 4-AP solution (not shown), they can be reasonably assumed to be IK,DR. These currents could be pharmacologically dissected into two different kinds of outward K+ currents (Fig. 5Ea and Fa) observed in stem cells [7], [18][20]: 1) a slowly activating current, IKs, Chr-sensitive; 2) a noisy rapidly activating and slowly inactivating current that saturated at positive potentials, IBK, Ibtx-sensitive [18]. In particular, in each cell type, the family of IKs traces was obtained in the presence of Ibtx (100 nM) (Fig. 5Ha and Ja) and IBK traces were determined by subtracting IKs from IK,DR (Fig. 6Ga and Ia). After adding Chr (50 µM) only small residual currents were recorded (Ibtx + Chr current traces).

In S-ASC, IBK and IKs had a more negative voltage threshold and a greater size with respect to V-ASC (Fig. 5Ga and Ha versus 5Ia and Ja, respectively; Fig. 6B; Tab. 1), resulting in a more hyperpolarized resting membrane potential and a better control of the membrane potential depolarization induced by stimuli such as hormones in S- than in V-ASC. Following adipogenic differentiation, both IKs and IBK drastically decreased in size (Fig. 5 E–J and 7Ac; Table 1) and, in both V- and S-ADIPO, IBK showed a greater size than IKs. The voltage threshold of IBK (Vth) was shifted towards more negative potentials, whereas the opposite occurred for IKs (Fig. 6A and Table 1). Thus, upon differentiation the slowly activating IKs observed as predominant in S-ASC, was replaced by the rapid IBK activated at more negative potentials. Again, major differences were observed in adipocytes from S- than V-ASC, further indicating the greater plasticity/differentiation potential of S-ASC. The changes between S- and V- populations observed during adipogenesis in these two types of K+ currents involved not only the voltage threshold and current size but also the current activation time constant (τ), (Table 1).

Figure 6. Voltage dependence of the two kind of IK,DR (IBK and IKs) and of IKir.

(A) Plots represent the maximum mean value of IK,DR (a), IBK and IKs (b,c) as a function of the applied voltage step recorded in the presence of Ba2+ from all experiments as in Fig. 6 G–J. Note the different ordinate scale for ASC and ADIPO. Panels put in evidence that IK,DR, IBK and IKs are reduced in size in the ADIPO versus the corresponding ASC. (B) K+ currents in representative cells elicited by voltage ramp stimulation in Control external solution without Ba2+ recording the total K+ currents (IK,tot) (a, – Ba2+) and after adding 0.1 mM Ba2+ to block IKir and record IK,DR (b, +Ba2+ 0.1 mM). IKir have been obtained by detracting current traces recorded in the presence of Ba2+ from those in the absence (c). IK/Cm and Vth mean ± SE values and number of experiments are indicated in Tab 2.

The application of 500 mseconds voltage ramp from −120 to 50 mV (holding potential of −60 mV) evoked both inward and outward currents in S- and V-ADIPO (Fig. 6Ba). Upon application of the Kir channel blocker Ba2+ (0.1 mM), currents activated in the inward direction by voltages negative to −30 mV were inhibited and only residual linear leak currents could be observed (Fig. 6Bb). In contrast, outward currents evoked by voltages positive to −30 mV (IK,DR) were essentially unaffected by the same concentration of Ba2+ (Fig. 6Bb). Such effects were fully reversible upon Ba2+ washout. The Ba2+-sensitive current, evaluated by detracting the current recorded in the presence of Ba2+ from control, revealed the characteristics of inward rectification, having a reversal potential of −75.4±5.8 (V-ADIPO; n = 24) and −78.2±6.2 mV (S-ADIPO; n = 28) in a 5 to 135 mM K+ gradient (Fig. 6Bc). These values were similar to the calculated K+ equilibrium potential under our experimental conditions of −82 mV. The IKir was greater in S- than in V-ADIPO and, notably, did not show a complete rectification at more positive potentials, particularly in S-ADIPO. In contrast, IKir in S- (n = 17) and V-ASC (n = 18) were very small in size (Fig. 6Bc; Table 1).


White adipose tissue shows different properties depending on the anatomical distribution of the adipose tissue [1], [3], [25]. The differential physiological effects and metabolic risk due to expansion of visceral (VAT) rather than subcutaneous (SAT) adipose tissue have been well documented in epidemiological and physiological studies [4], [26][28] and may be based on intrinsic differences in the differentiated adipose cell [29][36].

In the present study, we demonstrate that the differences observed in mature adipocytes and adipose tissues are related to the adult stem cells. In contrast to previous studies addressing the properties of subcutaneous and visceral preadipocytes [8]-[10], [32], [33], [35], which might be already committed to some extent, our results are based on a specific approach that compares the properties of adult stem cells, immunophenotyped for mesenchymal and stem properties, obtained from paired abdominal adipose biopsies of the same subjects (ruling out individual genetic variability, 7] and of the in vitro-differentiated adipocytes. Adult adipose stem cells have been well characterized for their mesenchymal origin and share properties very similar to bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells [7], [12], [37][41]. In particular, such subcutaneous stem cell population displayed high self-renewal ability, very low tumorigenic potential and were able to differentiate into various lineages including adipocytes and osteoblasts as well as to support in vivo regenerative processes [37][39]. The development of reliable human stem cell models for evaluating the molecular events underlying adipogenesis is mandatory, as different regulatory mechanisms in the adipogenic process have been described between rodents and humans [42]. In our previous work, we reported the isolation and characterization of the two adult adipose stem cell populations obtained from subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue [7]. In that paper, we had focused on the novel V-ASC population and only qualitatively compared S- and V-ASC in vitro differentiation towards the adipose phenotype. In the present paper, we further characterized and quantitatively compared the proliferation and differentiation abilities of the two stem populations as well as of their in vitro derived adipocytes. This analysis was obtained by performing the experiments in parallel conditions, enabling us to fully and strictly compare the properties of the stem cells and of their corresponding in vitro derived adipocytes. S-ASC showed a higher in vitro proliferation rate, which becomes evident as early as the first days of culture. These results are supported by a significant difference in the population doubling in long term culture. The occurrence of any potential cell transformation has been ruled out by cell karyotyping and immunophenotyping, confirming the absence of transformation and tumorigenesis reported in human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells transplanted in nude mice [39], [43], [44]. The reported immunophenotype of both S- and V-ASC is comparable to that already reported for these cells in our previous work [7]. The higher proliferative ability of S-ASC may also provide an intriguing support to the adipose tissue expandability hypothesis underlying the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases. According to this hypothesis, adipose tissue expansion is regarded as a buffering response of the organism to store excess nutrients and lipids [25], [45]. In agreement with the high proliferative and lipogenic/adipogenic ability of ASC in SAT, subcutaneous rather than visceral fat may expand in response to high fat diet to accomodate excess levels of potentially toxic free fatty acids [25], [45]. In obese subjects, when SAT is no longer able to maintain its role as an energy “sink” by its continued expansion, the lipids accumulate in other tissues. Such ectopic lipid deposition can cause insulin resistance, cardiovascular complications and other lipotoxic effects [45]. Based on our findings, it may also be hypothesized that a differential regional mechanism of fat mass expansion under the metabolic dysregulation pressure characterizing obesity development, being SAT more capable of hyperplasia and VAT of hypertrophy. Although under healthy conditions, adipocytes in SAT are bigger, better organized and functional than the corresponding ones in VAT, under metabolic stress, VAT responds with a deranged expansion associated with hypertrophy rather than hyperplasia. In particular, in epidemiologic studies, subjects with adipose hypertrophy have a significantly lower number of adipocytes than those with hyperplasia [46]. Hyperplasia is a less deleterious mechanism of fat expansion in which the adipocytes are still functional, whereas the hypertrophic adipocytes are cells prone to inflammation, apoptosis, fibrosis and release of free fatty acids (FFA). Rapid turnover of cells in the adipocyte population has recently been demonstrated in murine adipose tissue [47]. The expression of the two embryonic stem cell markers found in adult stem cells [48], nanog and oct-4, did not differed between S- and V-ASC and was significantly higher than that of the corresponding adipocytes, indicating a similar undifferentiated state of the 2 stem cell populations. In contrast, bmi-1 gene expression was more robust in S- compared to V-ASC. Self-renewal potential of stem cells has been described to be maintained not only in the haematopoietic lineage [24] but also in neural stem [49] and in cancer cells [50] by the expression of the polycomb gene bmi-1 [22], [23]. In addition, another polycomb gene member, ezh2, has recently been demonstrated to regulate adipogenesis through repression of the Wnt/β catenin pathway [51], which is also negatively controlled by the stem gene oct-4 [52]. Our findings provide intriguing evidence that, although showing a similar undifferentiated state, S-ASC have greater self-renewal and differentiation potential as compared to V-ASC. Accordingly, adipocytes from S-ASC are more numerous, better shaped and express higher levels of adipogenic genes and proteins characterizing the mature and functional cell. In particular, S-ADIPO display enhanced functionality compared to the corresponding V-ADIPO, showing not only a greater ability to accumulate intracellular triglycerides in a higher number of larger lipid droplets, but also displaying a significantly higher adiponectin secretory ability. Conversely, in vitro-differentiated V-ADIPO are more sensitive to β-adrenergic lipolytic stimuli, consistent with previous publications [53], [54]. Interestingly, an increased VAT contribution to FFA release, resulting in hepatic lipid accumulation and the development of insulin resistance, has been associated with obesity [55]. Moreover, previous studies suggest that VAT and its adipocytes display receptors with lower affinity for insulin both in lean and obese subjects [56] and that in this depot the intracellular signaling cascade in response to insulin is less sensitive than in SAT [11], [30]. In light of our findings, regional differences originating early at the level of adipose stem cells are conferred to the derived adipocytes. As a consequence, VAT rather than SAT displays lower sensitivity to the lipogenic and anti-lipolytic effects of insulin and higher sensitivity to β-adrenergic stimuli. The in vitro-differentiated adipocytes from ASC are functionally mature cells, capable not only of lipid storage but also to respond to lipolytic stimuli and to secrete adiponectin. In particular, adiponectin levels in conditioned media increase accordingly with the degree of adipocytes maturation. S-ASC and V-ASC not only differ in the levels of adiponectin expression but in their ability to functionally secrete this specific adipokine. The reduced rate of adiponectin secretion in V- compared to S- ADIPO reflects functional differences of V- versus S-ASC, possibly due to differences in adiponectin processing. Our data provide intriguing explanations for the metabolic profile improvement observed in mice transplanted with subcutaneous but not with visceral adipose tissue, independently of the site of transplantation [5], [57]. This effect is maintained over time, suggesting that newly differentiated adipocytes in transplanted tissue derive their memory from the adipose depot of origin.

The electrophysiological experiments confirm the stem cell nature of S- and V-ASC, since they both show two kinds of IK,DR (IBK and IKs) similar to those previously recorded in mesenchymal stem cells [7], [15], [16], [18][20] whereas the IKir are less well expressed. However, these patch clamp studies provide evidence which may account for the dissimilar functional properties existing between the two types of stem cells. Compared to V-, S-ASC have a smaller surface area both in adherent and detached conditions, a more hyperpolarized RMP and a greater resting specific membrane conductance, all properties supporting a higher differentiation potential [15], [16]. These differences in electrophysiological properties are in agreement with the greater size of the noisy and rapidly activating K+ currents (IBK) and the small size of slow IKs characterizing S- versus V-ASC, which may allow S-ASC to control more efficiently the depolarization of the membrane potential induced e.g. by hormones. Accordingly, differentiated S-ADIPO compared to V-ADIPO showed a greater i) increase in cell surface, ii) reduction in the specific resting membrane conductance, iii) size reduction and faster kinetics of IBK and IKs iv) increase in IKir. The higher increase in surface observed in S-ADIPO, estimated by the Cm parameter, suggests the occurrence of a better cell growth, while the strong decrease in the specific conductance, denotes an improved membrane barrier, which represents a pivotal feature to maintain ion intracellular homeostasis. Moreover, the greater increase of IKir size together with the more hyperpolarized RMP observed in S- compared to V-ADIPO are in agreement with the reduced expression of KDR channels and the increased size of the inward-rectifier K+ current (IKir) described as occurring during commitment and differentiation processes [14][17], also confirming the greater plasticity and differentiation potential of S- than V-ASC.

Finally, differentiated S-ADIPO show a more negative voltage threshold and a faster kinetic (faster time constant) of IBK activation, all factors that further improve the control of membrane potential depolarization induced by external stimuli. Conversely, the minor changes observed in V-ADIPO following differentiation support the conclusion that V-ASC display a lesser differentiation potential than S-ASC. Such differences in electrophysiological properties in both stem and differentiated cells may contribute to the functional differences observed between the two populations in terms of adipokine synthesis and lipolysis. While direct correlation between proliferative/differentiation properties and electrophysiological characterization of the two stem populations is beyond the aim of the present paper, it would be of great interest to examine these parameters in parallel with ASC populations of matched SAT and VAT obtained from a larger number of subjects.

One of the main limitations of our study relates to the use of enriched stem cell populations which, although presenting very low contamination by other cell types, may respond differently in terms of proliferation and differentiation, due to the presence of non synchronized adipose precursors at different cell cycle and differentiation stages. However, cloning such cells in parallel conditions from the V- and the S- compartments is challenging and extends beyond the scope of the current work. Moreover, the non synchronized situation used in this study resembles what occurs physiologically in vivo within the adipose depots.

In conclusion, our results support evidence of an autonomous programming in adult adipose stem cells from SAT and VAT compartments. A greater plasticity, proliferation and differentiation potential is evident in S-ASC, which seems to be maintained along the adipose lineage and accounts for the differences observed in anatomically distinct mature adipocytes and adipose depots. VAT and SAT functional differences originate early at the level of the adult adipose stem cell which maintains its memory of the adipose tissue of origin. Such differences in the stem cell may make distinct fat pads differentially susceptible to the development of metabolic dysfunctions and may serve as targets for specific therapeutic approaches.


The authors thank Prof. M. Maggi (University of Florence) for helpful discussion, Dr. P. Luciani (University of Florence) for kindly providing Runx2 primers, Prof. P. Romagnani (University of Florence) for the use of Scepter Handheld Automated Cell Counter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and Dr. T. Mello (University of Florence) for his help in fluorescence microscopy.

This paper is dedicated to the memory of our mentor Prof. Mario Serio, whose enthusiasm and guidance have been a basic element in our work.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SB GC M. Luconi. Performed the experiments: SB GC G. Poli MF RS AD EB SF GN FL. Analyzed the data: SB GC MF RS FF FL M. Luconi. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GF MS. Wrote the paper: M. Luconi. Performed routine abdominal surgery: M. Lucchese G. Perigli. Provided tissue biopsies: M. Lucchese G. Perigli.


  1. 1. Wajchenberg BL (2000) Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev 21: 697–738.
  2. 2. Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, Bergmann M, Schulze MB et al (2008) General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. N Engl J Med 359: 2105–20.
  3. 3. Pou KM, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Vasan RS, Maurovich-Horvat P et al (2007) Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes are cross-sectionally related to markers of inflammation and oxidative stress: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 116: 1234–41.
  4. 4. Misra A, Garg A, Abate N, Peshock RM, Stray-Gundersen J et al (1997) Relationship of anterior and posterior subcutaneous abdominal fat to insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic men. Obes Res 5: 93–9.
  5. 5. Tran TT, Yamamoto Y, Gesta S, Kahn CR (2008) Beneficial effects of subcutaneous fat transplantation on metabolism. Cell Metab 7: 410–20.
  6. 6. Hocking SL, Chisholm DJ, James DE (2008) Studies of regional adipose transplantation reveal a unique and beneficial interaction between subcutaneous adipose tissue and the intra-abdominal compartment. Diabetologia 51: 900–2.
  7. 7. Baglioni S, Francalanci M, Squecco R, Lombardi A, Cantini G et al (2009) Characterization of human adult stem-cell populations isolated from visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue. FASEB J 23: 3494–505.
  8. 8. Tchkonia T, Giorgadze N, Pirtskhalava T, Thomou T, DePonte M et al (2006) Fat depot-specific characteristics are retained in strains derived from single human preadipocytes. Diabetes 55: 2571–8.
  9. 9. Tchkonia T, Lenburg M, Thomou T, Giorgadze N, Frampton G et al (2007) Identification of depot-specific human fat cell progenitors through distinct expression profiles and developmental gene patterns. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292: E298–307.
  10. 10. Tchkonia T, Tchoukalova YD, Giorgadze N, Pirtskhalava T, Karagiannides I et al (2005) Abundance of two human preadipocyte subtypes with distinct capacities for replication, adipogenesis, and apoptosis varies among fat depots. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E267–77.
  11. 11. Lafontan M, Berlan M (2003) Do regional differences in adipocyte biology provide new pathophysiological insights? Trends Pharmacol Sci 24: 276–83.
  12. 12. Ramírez-Ponce MP, Mateos JC, Bellido JA (2003) Human Adipose Cells Have Voltage-dependent Potassium Currents. J Membrane Biol 196: 129–134.
  13. 13. Hu H, He ML, Tao R, Sun HY, Hu R et al (2009) Characterization of Ion Channels in Human Preadipocytes. J Cell Physiol 218: 427–435.
  14. 14. Ouadid-Ahidouch H, Roudbaraki M, Ahidouch M, Delcourt P, Prevarskaya N (2004) Cell-cycle-dependent expression of the large Ca2+-activated K+ channels in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 316: 244–251.
  15. 15. Sundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL (2008) Membrane potential controls adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One 3: e3737.
  16. 16. Sundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL (2009) Role of membrane potential in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation. Stem Cell Rev 5: 231–46.
  17. 17. Blackiston DJ, McLaughlin KA, Levin M (2009) Bioelectric controls of cell proliferation: Ion channels, membrane voltage and the cell cycle. Cell Cycle 8: 3519–3528.
  18. 18. Heubach JF, Graf EM, Leutheuser J, Bock M, Balana B et al (2004) Electrophysiological properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Physiol 554: 659–72.
  19. 19. Benvenuti S, Saccardi R, Luciani P, Urbani S, Deledda C et al (2006) Neuronal differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: changes in the expression of the Alzheimer's disease-related gene seladin-1. Exp Cell Res. 312: 2592–604.
  20. 20. Nincheri P, Luciani P, Squecco R, Donati C, Bernacchioni C et al (2009) Sphingosine 1-phosphate induces differentiation of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells towards smooth muscle cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 1741–54.
  21. 21. Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Klüter H, Bieback K (2006) Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells 24: 1294–301.
  22. 22. Lessard J, Sauvageau G (2003) Bmi-1 determines the proliferative capacity of normal and leukaemic stem cells. Nature 423: 255–60.
  23. 23. Park IK, Qian D, Kiel M, Becker MW, Pihalja M et al (2003) Bmi-1 is required for maintenance of adult self-renewing haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 423: 302–5.
  24. 24. Jacobs JJ, Kieboom K, Marino S, DePinho RA, van Lohuizen M (1999) The oncogene and Polycomb-group gene bmi-1 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through the ink4a locus. Nature 397: 164–8.
  25. 25. Virtue S, Vidal-Puig A (2008) It's not how fat you are, it's what you do with it that counts. PLoS Biol 6: e237.
  26. 26. Carey VJ, Walters EE, Colditz GA, Solomon CG, Willett WC et al (1997) Body fat distribution and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. The Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 145: 614–9.
  27. 27. Wang Z, Heshka S, Heymsfield SB, Shen W, Gallagher D (2005) A cellular-level approach to predicting resting energy expenditure across the adult years. Am J Clin Nutr 81: 799–806.
  28. 28. Tankó LB, Bagger YZ, Alexandersen P, Larsen PJ, Christiansen C (2003) Peripheral adiposity exhibits an independent dominant antiatherogenic effect in elderly women. Circulation 107: 1626–31.
  29. 29. Laviola L, Perrini S, Cignarelli A, Natalicchio A, Leonardini A et al (2006) Insulin signaling in human visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in vivo. Diabetes 55: 952–61.
  30. 30. Zierath JR, Livingston JN, Thörne A, Bolinder J, Reynisdottir S et al (1998) Regional difference in insulin inhibition of non-esterified fatty acid release from human adipocytes: relation to insulin receptor phosphorylation and intracellular signalling through the insulin receptor substrate-1 pathway. Diabetologia 41: 1343–54.
  31. 31. Perrini S, Laviola L, Cignarelli A, Melchiorre M, De Stefano F et al (2008) Fat depot-related differences in gene expression, adiponectin secretion, and insulin action and signalling in human adipocytes differentiated in vitro from precursor stromal cells. Diabetologia 51: 155–64.
  32. 32. Tchkonia T, Giorgadze N, Pirtskhalava T, Tchoukalova Y, Karagiannides I et al (2002) Fat depot origin affects adipogenesis in primary cultured and cloned human preadipocytes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282: R1286–96.
  33. 33. Tchoukalova YD, Votruba SB, Tchkonia T, Giorgadze N, Kirkland JL et al (2010) Regional differences in cellular mechanisms of adipose tissue gain with overfeeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 18226–31.
  34. 34. Kursawe R, Eszlinger M, Narayan D, Liu T, Bazuine M et al (2010) Cellularity and adipogenic profile of the abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue from obese adolescents: association with insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis. Diabetes 59: 2288–96.
  35. 35. Cleveland-Donovan K, Maile LA, Tsiaras WG, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL et al (2010) IGF-I activation of the AKT pathway is impaired in visceral but not subcutaneous preadipocytes from obese subjects. Endocrinology 151: 3752–63.
  36. 36. Fain JN, Madan AK, Hiler ML, Cheema P, Bahouth SW (2004) Comparison of the release of adipokines by adipose tissue, adipose tissue matrix, and adipocytes from visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissues of obese humans. Endocrinology 145: 2273–82.
  37. 37. Rodriguez AM, Elabd C, Delteil F, Astier J, Vernochet C et al (2004) Adipocyte differentiation of multipotent cells established from human adipose tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 315: 255–63.
  38. 38. Rodriguez AM, Elabd C, Amri EZ, Ailhaud G, Dani C (2005) The human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Biochimie 87: 125–8.
  39. 39. Rodriguez AM, Pisani D, Dechesne CA, Turc-Carel C, Kurzenne JY et al (2005) Transplantation of a multipotent cell population from human adipose tissue induces dystrophin expression in the immunocompetent mdx mouse. J Exp Med 201: 1397–405.
  40. 40. Dicker A, Le Blanc K, Aström G, van Harmelen V, Götherström C et al (2005) Functional studies of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult human adipose tissue. Exp Cell Res 308: 283–90.
  41. 41. Guilak F, Lott KE, Awad HA, Cao Q, Hicok KC et al (2006) Clonal Analysis of the Differentiation Potential of Human Adipose-Derived Adult Stem Cells J. Cell. Physiol. 206: 229–237.
  42. 42. Fontaine C, Cousin W, Plaisant M, Dani C, Peraldi P (2008) Hedgehog signaling alters adipocyte maturation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 26: 1037–46.
  43. 43. Rubio D, Garcia-Castro J, Martín MC, de la Fuente R, Cigudosa JC et al (2005) Spontaneous human adult stem cell transformation. Cancer Res 65: 3035–9.
  44. 44. Vilalta M, Dégano IR, Bagó J, Gould D, Santos M et al (2008) Biodistribution, long-term survival, and safety of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells transplanted in nude mice by high sensitivity non-invasive bioluminescence imaging. Stem Cells Dev 17: 993–1003.
  45. 45. Virtue S, Vidal-Puig A (2010) Adipose tissue expandability, lipotoxicity and the Metabolic Syndrome--an allostatic perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta 1801: 338-49. pp. 338–49.
  46. 46. Arner E, Westermark PO, Spalding KL, Britton T, Rydén M et al (2010) Adipocyte turnover: relevance to human adipose tissue morphology. Diabetes 59: 105–9.
  47. 47. Rigamonti A, Brennand K, Lau F, Cowan CA (2011) Rapid cellular turnover in adipose tissue. PLoS One 6: e17637.
  48. 48. Beltrami AP, Cesselli D, Bergamin N, Marcon P, Rigo S et al (2007) Multipotent cells can be generated in vitro from several adult human organs (heart, liver, and bone marrow). Blood 110: 3438–46.
  49. 49. Fasano CA, Phoenix TN, Kokovay E, Lowry N, Elkabetz Y et al (2009) Bmi-1 cooperates with Foxg1 to maintain neural stem cell self-renewal in the forebrain. Genes Dev 23: 561–74.
  50. 50. Song LB, Zeng MS, Liao WT, Zhang L, Mo HY et al (2006) Bmi-1 is a novel molecular marker of nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression and immortalizes primary human nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. Cancer Res 66: 6225–32.
  51. 51. Wang L, Jin Q, Lee JE, Su IH, Ge K (2010) Histone H3K27 methyltransferase Ezh2 represses Wnt genes to facilitate adipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 7317–22.
  52. 52. Abu-Remaileh M, Gerson A, Farago M, Nathan G, Alkalay I et al (2010) Oct-3/4 regulates stem cell identity and cell fate decisions by modulating Wnt/β-catenin signalling. EMBO J 29: 3236–48.
  53. 53. Mauriege P, Galitzky J, Berlan M, Lafontan M (1987) Heterogeneous distribution of beta and alpha-2 adrenoceptor binding sites in human fat cells from various fat deposits: functional consequences. Eur J Clin Invest 17: 156–65.
  54. 54. van Harmelen V, Dicker A, Rydén M, Hauner H, Lönnqvist F et al (2002) Increased lipolysis and decreased leptin production by human omental as compared with subcutaneous preadipocytes. Diabetes 51: 2029–36.
  55. 55. Nielsen S, Guo Z, Johnson CM, Hensrud DD, Jensen MD (2004) Splanchnic lipolysis in human obesity. J Clin Invest 113: 1582–8.
  56. 56. Bolinder J, Kager L, Ostman J, Arner P (1983) Differences at the receptor and postreceptor levels between human omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue in the action of insulin on lipolysis. Diabetes 32: 117–23.
  57. 57. Gavrilova O, Marcus-Samuels B, Graham D, Kim JK, Shulman GI et al (2000) Surgical implantation of adipose tissue reverses diabetes in lipoatrophic mice. J Clin Invest 105: 271–8.