Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Neuropathology of 16p13.11 Deletion in Epilepsy

  • Joan Y. W. Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom

  • Dalia Kasperavičiūtė,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom

  • Lillian Martinian,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom

  • Maria Thom,

    Affiliation Division of Neuropathology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom

  • Sanjay M. Sisodiya

    s.sisodiya@ucl.ac.uk

    Affiliations Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom, Epilepsy Society, Chalfont St Peter, Bucks, United Kingdom

Neuropathology of 16p13.11 Deletion in Epilepsy

  • Joan Y. W. Liu, 
  • Dalia Kasperavičiūtė, 
  • Lillian Martinian, 
  • Maria Thom, 
  • Sanjay M. Sisodiya
PLOS
x

Abstract

16p13.11 genomic copy number variants are implicated in several neuropsychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, autism, mental retardation, ADHD and epilepsy. The mechanisms leading to the diverse clinical manifestations of deletions and duplications at this locus are unknown. Most studies favour NDE1 as the leading disease-causing candidate gene at 16p13.11. In epilepsy at least, the deletion does not appear to unmask recessive-acting mutations in NDE1, with haploinsufficiency and genetic modifiers being prime candidate disease mechanisms. NDE1 encodes a protein critical to cell positioning during cortical development. As a first step, it is important to determine whether 16p13.11 copy number change translates to detectable brain structural alteration. We undertook detailed neuropathology on surgically resected brain tissue of two patients with intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), who had the same heterozygous NDE1-containing 800 kb 16p13.11 deletion, using routine histological stains and immunohistochemical markers against a range of layer-specific, white matter, neural precursor and migratory cell proteins, and NDE1 itself. Surgical temporal lobectomy samples from a MTLE case known not to have a deletion in NDE1 and three non-epilepsy cases were included as disease controls. We found that apart from a 3 mm hamartia in the temporal cortex of one MTLE case with NDE1 deletion and known hippocampal sclerosis in the other case, cortical lamination and cytoarchitecture were normal, with no differences between cases with deletion and disease controls. How 16p13.11 copy changes lead to a variety of brain diseases remains unclear, but at least in epilepsy, it would not seem to be through structural abnormality or dyslamination as judged by microscopy or immunohistochemistry. The need to integrate additional data with genetic findings to determine their significance will become more pressing as genetic technologies generate increasingly rich datasets. Detailed examination of brain tissue, where available, will be an important part of this process in neurogenetic disease specifically.

Introduction

Copy number variants are insertions, deletions or duplications of segments of DNA. They can be found in healthy individuals, or be associated with disease. They have been the focus of considerable recent interest in neurological disorders [1], [2]. In particular, 16p13.11 copy number changes are associated with schizophrenia [3], mental retardation [4], [5], attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [6] and both idiopathic generalised [7][9] and focal epilepsies [10]. In our previous study, we found 23/3812 patients had >100 kb deletions at 16p13.11, with Nuclear Distribution gene E homolog 1 (NDE1) involved in 22/23 [10]. NDE1 encodes a protein that belongs to the highly-conserved nuclear distribution protein family. The Nde1 protein predominantly interacts both with Lissencephaly-1 (Lis-1), a protein essential for lamination of the cerebral cortex [11][13], and with dynein, a cytoplasmic motor protein that directs cellular cargos towards the ‘minus end’ of microtubules [11], [14][16]. Together, the Nde1-Lis-1-dynein complex mediates a range of intracellular motility activities, including the transport of organelles to the centrosomes, the orientation of mitotic spindles, the separation of chromosomes during mitosis and the assembly of centrosomes and spindles [13], [16][22], all of which are important for cortical development.

NDE1 loss has been suggested a prime candidate for disease mechanisms associated with 16p13.11 deletion [4], [23]. Deficiency of Lis-1 and Nde1 expression in Lis-1 and Nde1 mutant mice and Nde1 knockout mice results in a marked loss of cortical lamination, reduced brain size and a reduction in precursor cell division and segregation [11][13], [22]. In humans, LIS1 haploinsufficiency (from a deletion at 17p13.3) results in Type 1 Lissencephaly or Miller Dieker syndrome, where patients have gross cortical dyslamination, a resulting smooth or under-folded cortex, and may experience epileptic seizures [24], [25]. Similarly, patients with homozygous frameshift mutation in NDE1 show microlissencephaly (reduced brain size and simplified cortex) and experience seizures starting early in life [26], [27]. Heterozygous deletion of NDE1 specifically may be a prime cause of epilepsy, both focal and idiopathic generalised, associated with 16p13.11 deletion [7], [10], [28]. Testing of this hypothesis directly in humans is difficult as the deletion is rare, and brain tissue is almost never available from patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsies. In our cohort of patients with focal epilepsy however, there were two patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) with NDE1-containing 16p13.11 deletion, who had previously undergone temporal lobectomy as treatment for their drug-resistant seizures. This surgically-resected material allows direct examination in the target tissue of the consequences of heterozygous NDE1 deletion. We tested the hypothesis that NDE1 loss would cause cortical dyslamination, using immunohistochemistry for a range of layer-specific, neural precursor and migratory cell markers.

Results

The disease cases 1 and 2 both had the same 800 kb 16p13.11 deletion including NDE1.

Histological staining

The temporal cortex of Case 1, Case 2 and disease controls appeared normal with no cell loss or dyslamination evident in H+E, LFB or anti- Neuronal Nuclei (NeuN) labelled sections (Figure 1). LFB and Alcian Blue stains revealed a well-defined nodule of 3 mm in diameter, with an accumulation of metachromatic material, in the subcortical white matter of the middle temporal gyrus of Case 1 (Figure 2A–B). This nodule was composed of small, round cells that were immunopositive for microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2; Figure 2C–D) but not immunopositive for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), NeuN, synaptophysin or neurofilaments. These MAP2-immunopositive cells intermingled with larger, NeuN-immunopositive neurons and GFAP-immunopositive reactive astrocytes inside the nodule. Together, these neuropathological findings define the nodule as a hamartia (a small hamartoma [29], [30]). The overlying cortex appeared normal and serial sections taken from either side showed that the hamartia was neither part of a glio-neuronal tumour nor part of a larger malformation. Case 2 and other disease controls did not show pathological features indicative of a hamartia.

thumbnail
Figure 1. The temporal cortex of Case 2.

The cortical lamination of the temporal cortex of Case 2 was normal, as compared to the MTLE case without NDE1 deletion and non-epilepsy surgical controls. Scale = 200 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. Hamartia in the temporal cortex of Case 1.

LFB (A) and Alcian Blue (B) stains showed the location of the hamartia within the middle temporal gyrus (*). Small, round cells inside the hamartia were immunopositive for MAP2 as viewed at a low (C) and high (D) magnification. Scale = 100 µm (A–C), 20 µm (D).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g002

The hippocampus of Case 1 was normal, with no loss of cells in H+E, LFB and anti-NeuN labelled sections. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed that Case 2 had a smaller left hippocampus compared to the right (Figure 3A). Microscopic examination of Case 2's surgically-resected left hippocampus revealed a marked loss of NeuN-immunopositive neurons in the cornu Ammonis (CA) 4, 3 and 1 (Figure 3B). The loss of NeuN-immunopositive cells in CA regions was also noted in the MTLE control without NDE1 deletion (Figure 3C). Granule cell dispersion was present in Case 2. A dense matrix of GFAP-immunopositive cells and processes was observed throughout the hippocampus of Case 2, particularly in CA regions (Figure 3D). Dynorphin (Figure 3E) and neuropeptide Y immunoreactivities were evident in the inner, middle and outer molecular layers of the dentate gyrus of Case 2, confirming mossy fibre spouting. Together, these features were consistent with hippocampal sclerosis, a common pathology observed in MTLE [31].

thumbnail
Figure 3. Hippocampal sclerosis in Case 2.

(A) A coronal MRI image of Case 2 showing left hippocampal atrophy (*; inset). No cerebral malformations were evident. The histology showed hippocampal sclerosis: (B) NeuN-immunopositive cells were lost in the cornu Ammonis (CA) regions of the left hippocampus of Case 2, as seen in the MTLE control case without NDE1 deletion (C). (D) Strong GFAP-immunoreactivity was observed in all regions of the hippocampus of Case 2. (E) Dynorphin-immunoreactivity was observed throughout the molecular layer of Case 2, demonstrating the presence of mossy fibre spouting. GCL = granule cell layer, MOL = molecular cell layer. Scale = 100 µm (B–E).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g003

Layer-specific markers

We examined the lamination of the temporal cortex and anatomy of the hippocampus of Case 1, Case 2 (Figure 4A, Figure S1A) and disease controls (Figure 4B, Figure S1B) using layer-specific immunohistochemical markers: anti-microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B), N200, SMI32, anti-calretinin, anti-calbindin and anti-parvalbumin. These layer-specific markers label cell types specifically distributed within certain human cortical layers [32][35]. The white matter of Case 1, Case 2 and disease controls was investigated using SMI94 and anti-nogo-A antibodies. Nogo-A is a reticulin family protein expressed mostly by oligodendrocytes in the brain [36].

thumbnail
Figure 4. MAP1B, SMI32, Calbindin and SMI94-immunopositive labelling in the temporal cortex of Case 2 and the MTLE control.

MAP1B and calbindin-immunopositive cells were predominantly observed in the upper cortical layers, while SMI32-immunopositive cells and processes were mainly found in the lower cortical layers of MTLE cases with (A) or without NDE1 deletion (B). Immunoreactivity of SMI94 was observed in the lower cortical layers and white matter of both cases. Scale = 200 µm (A, B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g004

The pattern of immunolabelling with layer-specific and white matter markers was similar for Case 1, Case 2 and disease controls. In the temporal cortex, many MAP1B-, N200-, SMI32-, calretinin-, calbindin-, parvalbumin-immunopositive cells were observed in the upper cortical layers (II and III) of Case 1, Case 2 (Figure 4A, Figure S1A) and disease controls (Figure 4B, Figure S1B). A few MAP1B-, N200-, SMI32-, calbindin- and parvalbumin- immunopositive cells were also observed in the lower cortical layers (IV, V and/or VI) of all cases. All immunopositive cells in Case 1 and 2 appeared normal with no atypical or dysplastic features. Thick, SMI94-immunopositive radial fibres were predominantly observed from cortical layer IV to the white matter of all cases, with fewer horizontal fibres highlighted in layer I of Case 1, Case 2 (Figure 4A) and disease controls (Figure 4B). In the white matter of all cases, nogo-A-immunopositive cells were small and round, with labelling restricted to the scant cell body of oligodendrocytes. Nogo-A-immunopositive cells were found predominantly in the white matter rather than the gray matter.

In the hippocampus of all cases, MAP1B-, N200-, SMI32- calretinin-, calbindin- and parvalbumin-immunopositive cells were observed in the CA regions and subiculum. There were visibly fewer N200-, SMI32-, calretinin-, calbindin- and parvalbumin-immunopositive cells in the CA regions of Case 2 and the MTLE control without NDE1 deletion, than in Case 1 and non-epilepsy controls, in keeping with the presence of hippocampal sclerosis in the MTLE disease control and Case 2. MAP1B- and calbindin-immunopositive granule cells were evident in the granule cell layer of all cases. Parvalbumin-immunopositive processes or synapses were often observed between granule cells in the GCL and the CA2 region of all cases (Figure 5). Nogo-A-immunopositive oligodendrocytes were evident in the white matter of all cases.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Parvalbumin-immunopositive labelling in the hippocampus of Case 2.

A few numbers of parvalbumin-immunopositive cells were still observed in CA4 (A) and CA2 (B) of the sclerotic hippocampus of Case 2. Some parvalbumin-immunopositive processes and plexuses were observed around granule cells (A) and surviving pyramidal neurons in CA2 (B). CA = cornu Ammonis, GCL = granule cell layer. Scale = 20 µm (A, B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g005

Precursor and migratory cell markers

Antibodies against nestin, GFAPδand PAX6 label neural precursor cells [37][40], while antibodies against DCX and reelin label migratory cells in the developing and adult mammalian brain [41][43]. The immunolabelling of these markers was not markedly different between Case 1, Case 2 and disease controls.

Nestin-, GFAPδ-, PAX6-, DCX- and reelin-immunopositive cells were predominantly observed in cortical layer I and white matter of Case 1, Case 2 (Figure 6A–C, 7A–B) and disease controls. GFAPδ- and DCX-immunopositive cells were binucleated or multinucleated with glial-like processes. Nestin-immunopositive blood vessels were observed throughout the cortex. A few GFAPδ-immunopositive cells were observed in the deeper cortex and in the white matter of all cases; they were often situated around blood vessels. PAX6- and small, reelin-immunopositive cells could also be seen in the other cortical layers of all cases.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Nestin, GFAPδ and PAX6 immunopositive labelling in the temporal cortex and hippocampus of Case 2.

Nestin- (A) and GFAPδ (B) strongly immunopositive glial-like cells were observed in cortical layer I and white matter of the temporal cortex and the hippocampus of Case 2. Nestin-immunopositive cells with short, unipolar processes were occasionally found in the white matter of Case 2 (A, middle inset). Small, round PAX6-immunopositive cells were found throughout the temporal cortex and hippocampus. BV = blood vessels, CA = cornu Ammonis, GCL = granule cell layer. Scale = 20 µm (A–C), 10 µm (A, middle inset).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g006

thumbnail
Figure 7. DCX and reelin-immunopositive labelling in the temporal cortex of Case 2.

In cortical layer I, DCX-immunopositive cells with a glial-like morphology clustered in groups of two or three (arrows, A). DCX-immunopositive cells with short, bipolar processes were occasionally observed in the upper cortical layers (A inset). Reelin-immunopositive cells were also observed in cortical layer I (B) and in deeper cortical layers of Case 2 (B, inset). Scale = 10 µm (A, B, insets).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g007

In the hippocampus, GFAPδ-immunopositive cells were observed in all CA regions, particularly in the sclerotic hippocampus of Case 2 and the MTLE control case without NDE1 deletion. PAX6- and DCX-immunopositive cells were observed throughout the hippocampus, particularly in the CA4 and granule cell layer of all cases. Large, reelin-immunopositive cells were observed in the CA4 region and in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus, while small reelin-immunopositive cells were observed throughout the hippocampus.

NDE1

The immunoreactivity of NDE1 was observed in the cytoplasm of neurons throughout the temporal cortex and hippocampus of Case1 and 2 and disease controls (Figure 8). No marked difference in immunolabelling was observed between Case 1, Case 2 and disease controls.

thumbnail
Figure 8. NDE1-immunopositive labelling in the temporal cortex of Case 2 and MTLE case without NDE1 deletion.

The immunoreactivity of NDE1 (arrows) was predominantly observed in the cytoplasm of neurons in Case 2 and the epilepsy control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g008

Multidrug resistance-related protein 1

The chromosomal region 16p13.11 also contains ABCC1, which encodes the multidrug resistance-related protein 1 (MRP1). We investigated MRP1 expression using MRPr1, an antibody which has been used in previous human studies [44], [45]. MRPr1-immunopositive blood vessels were observed throughout temporal cortex and hippocampus of Case 1, Case 2 (Figure 9A–B) and disease controls. Many MRPr1- immunopositive glial cells and fibres were also observed in the cortical layer I and white matter of the temporal cortex and the hippocampal CA regions. Most MRPr1-immunopositive glial cells were found around blood vessels (Figure 9B). The glial expression of anti-MRP1 has been previously described in studies using surgical MTLE tissue without known NDE1 deletion [44]. Disease controls showed a similar pattern of MRP1 immunoreactivity to that seen in Case 1 and Case 2.

thumbnail
Figure 9. MRP1-immunopositive labelling in the temporal cortex and hippocampus of Case 2.

(A) Many MRP1-immunopositive cells and processes were observed in the hippocampus. (B) MRP1-immunopositive cells were also evident in the temporal cortex (usually around blood vessels). CA = cornu Ammonis, GCL = granule cell layer, BV = blood vessel. Scale = 50 µm (A), 20 µm (B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g009

Discussion

Two key challenges in disease genetics are to identify pathogenic genetic changes and to understand how these changes lead to disease phenotypes. For neuropsychiatric diseases, the latter challenge is often especially daunting, as direct study of the organ involved, the brain, is usually impossible. But such studies, using brain material from patients with the neurological disease in question, especially those with known genetic abnormalities, are important as they may provide valuable insights and bounds about the effects of genetic variants on brain structure and disease mechanisms. We examined the surgically-resected temporal cortex and hippocampus of two people with MTLE with identical 800 kb deletion at 16p13.11, encompassing seven genes, including NDE1 and ABCC1. In Case 1, the white matter of the temporal cortex contained a hamartia, which was not associated with any overlying cortical dyslamination or any dysmorphic neurons, balloon cells or more extensive changes seen in glio-neuronal tumours. In Case 2, we found neuronal cell loss, gliosis and re-organisation, changes typical of hippocampal sclerosis. The genetic basis, if any, of hippocampal sclerosis is unknown: in our previous study [10], only 2/23 patients with 16p13.11 deletions had hippocampal sclerosis, whilst other microdeletions are also associated with hippocampal sclerosis [46]. Both hamartia and hippocampal sclerosis occur in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy [30], [47], and are unlikely to be due to the 16p13.11 deletion.

Case 1 and Case 2 both had a normal, hexalaminar temporal cortex, housing appropriate layer-specific cell types. No marked difference was observed for NDE1 immunoreactivity or expression of proteins associated with cell division and migration in the temporal cortex or hippocampus of either case in comparison to disease controls. NDE1 immunoreactivity in both Case 1 and 2 and disease controls was localised to the cytoplasm of neurons, which is consistent with its role in intracellular transport [22], [48].

In animal studies, Nde−/− mutants have no Nde1 expression and possess a brain that is a third smaller than controls, while heterozygous Nde1+/− mutant mice express a considerable amount of NDE1 protein, that is only slightly lower than controls in immunoblotting experiments, and these heterozygous Nde1 +/− mutant mice have brain size and weight comparable to controls [12]. Humans with 1 to 3.4 Mb homozygous deletions at 16p13.11 have small stature, dysmorphic features, seizures, microcephaly or microlissencephaly [4], [26]. In humans, the contrasting phenotypes of duplication and deletion suggest 16p13.11 is a dosage-sensitive region [28]. However, the resected brain tissue of our two patients with heterozygous 16p13.11 deletion was normal for the parameters we examined. Moreover, these patients did not have intellectual disability, or any remarkable abnormalities of appearance or stature. Therefore, no clear dose-dependency phenomenon is apparent in our two patients with, at least, loss of one copy of the whole NDE1 gene. If 16p13.11 deletion contributes to brain disease in our two patients through loss of at least one copy of NDE1, as is the current favoured hypothesis, then this contribution to disease would not seem to be through pathology obvious at the light microscopic level or immunophenotypically-determined dyslamination. The deletion of NDE1 could act at another, for example submicroscopic, level; it is also possible that the deletion unmasks a recessive mutation on the remaining allele, but this is unlikely given the normal appearance and cognitive abilities of our two patients and previous examination of this possibility [10]. Alternatively, loss of NDE1 in patients with heterozygous NDE1 deletion may possibly be compensated by other proteins with similar functions such as LIS1 or NDE1-related protein 1 (NDEL1), a homolog of NDE1 [14], [15], [49].

Finally, it is possible that at least in our two patients, loss of NDE1 is not the key contributor to disease (here, epilepsy) associated with 16p13.11 deletion, suggesting that other candidates and mechanisms need to be sought. Overall, however, the link between heterozygous deletion of 16p13.11 and epilepsy, and other neuropsychiatric diseases, is clear [9], [10]: this deletion is not a polymorphism, and is at the very least a disease risk factor. In Case 1, seizures continued despite surgery, implying that epileptogenic tissue remained unresected. The 16p13.11 deletion in this case may therefore have conceivably acted as a risk factor for epilepsy by subtly altering brain structure beyond the resected tissue, a possibility we could not test as only resected tissue was available for analysis. We note, however, that NDE1 is expressed in the human temporal lobe (e.g. [27], such that if NDE1 deletion were acting by altering microscopic brain structure, examination for such changes in the temporal lobe would be a reasonable strategy: we did not find any alteration with the methods employed.

Our study illustrates the central role for detailed phenotyping in interpretation of genetic findings: for neurogenetics, human neuropathological studies are key, setting boundaries for putative mechanisms of action of identified genetic mutations. We anticipate an increasing role for such studies in human genetic diseases in general.

Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the Joint Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery. The work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). Written informed consent was obtained for research. We examined surgically-resected temporal cortical and hippocampal tissue from two MTLE patients with confirmed 16p13.11 deletion. Their clinical details and results from genetic analysis are described in Table 1 and Figure 10. Neither of the patients has learning disability. No structural abnormalities were observed in MRI, apart from Case 2 who had a smaller left hippocampus compared to the right. Surgically-resected temporal cortex and hippocampus of a patient with MTLE known not to have the deletion of the entire NDE1 gene, and resected neocortical tissue from three trauma patients were used as disease controls in immunohistochemical studies (Table 1). The three trauma patients were not tested for the 16p13.11 deletion, but the frequency of this deletion in patients with focal epilepsy was 0.6%, and the deletion was not observed in unselected controls [10], so it is very unlikely that all these three (or indeed any one) of the disease control patients had the deletion.

thumbnail
Figure 10. An illustration showing deleted genes in 16p13.11 in Case 1 and Case 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.g010

All surgical tissue was fixed, processed and paraffin-embedded within one week following surgery. Routine histology staining, including haematoxylin and eosin (H+E) and luxol fast blue (LFB), was performed. Alcian Blue, an acid-mucosubstance stain, was used in Case 1 to investigate the observed hamartia. Automated immunohistochemistry was performed using Bond Max Automated Immunostainer and reagents (Leica, UK). 5 µm sections on adhesive microscopic slides (Raymond A Lamb, UK) were first processed in dewaxing solution and 100% alcohol. Antigen retrieval protocols were applied as detailed in Table 2 before sections were immersed in 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 5 minutes. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies for 15 minutes. Post-primary polymer solutions were applied for 8 minutes. Chromogen activation was achieved using diaminobenzidine. Sections were dewaxed and rehydrated through xylene and graded alcohols and taken to water. Antigen retrieval procedures were applied as described in Table 2. All sections were outlined using a wax pen before placing flat in an immunohistochemical humidity chamber. Primary antibodies were diluted with Dako diluent and then incubated on sections as detailed in Table 2. NDE1 primary antibody was used at 1∶500. The following day, sections were incubated in Dako Envision horseradish peroxide solution for 30 minutes. Chromogen activation was performed using Dako Envision diaminobenzidine and substrate buffer for 5 minutes. Sections were washed in phosphate buffer solution between each step. Sections with omission of primary antibodies or their replacement non-specific IgG were included in experiments as negative control. Sections were then processed through graded alcohols and xylene and coverslipped (TissueTek). A light microscope and camera (Nikon Eclipse 80i and Sight DS Fi1) were used to visualize sections and to capture images. Montages were acquired using the JVC camera attached to an ImagePro Plus system (Media Cybernetics, USA). The specificity of the antibody against NDE1 was tested (see Figure S2).

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Immunoreactivities of layer-specific markers in the temporal cortex of Case 2 and the MTLE control. MAP1B, calretinin, calbindin and parvalbumin-immunopositive cells were predominantly observed in the upper cortical layers, while N200- and SMI32-immunopositive cells and processes were mainly found in the lower cortical layers of MTLE cases with (A) or without NDE1 deletion (B). Immunoreactivity of SMI94 was observed in the lower cortical layers and white matter of both cases. Scale = 200 µm (A, B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.s001

(PDF)

Figure S2.

The specificity of the antibody against NDE1. Immunoblotting experiment detected NDE1 at ∼38 kDa, the expected molecular weight of the protein, in the lysate from the resected temporal cortex of patient with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034813.s002

(TIF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MT SMS. Performed the experiments: JL DK LM. Analyzed the data: JL DK MT SMS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MT SMS. Wrote the paper: JL DK LM MT SMS.

References

  1. 1. Conrad DF, Pinto D, Redon R, Feuk L, Gokcumen O, et al. (2010) Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464: 704–712.
  2. 2. Shaikh TH, Gai X, Perin JC, Glessner JT, Xie H, et al. (2009) High-resolution mapping and analysis of copy number variations in the human genome: a data resource for clinical and research applications. Genome Res 19: 1682–1690.
  3. 3. Need AC, Ge D, Weale ME, Maia J, Feng S, et al. (2009) A genome-wide investigation of SNPs and CNVs in schizophrenia. PLoS Genet 5: e1000373.
  4. 4. Hannes FD, Sharp AJ, Mefford HC, de Ravel T, Ruivenkamp CA, et al. (2009) Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13.11: The deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant. J Med Genet 46: 223–232.
  5. 5. Ullmann R, Turner G, Kirchhoff M, Chen W, Tonge B, et al. (2007) Array CGH identifies reciprocal 16p13.1 duplications and deletions that predispose to autism and/or mental retardation. Hum Mutat 28: 674–682.
  6. 6. Williams NM, Zaharieva I, Martin A, Langley K, Mantripragada K, et al. (2010) Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 376: 1401–1408.
  7. 7. de Kovel CG, Trucks H, Helbig I, Mefford HC, Baker C, et al. (2010) Recurrent microdeletions at 15q11.2 and 16p13.11 predispose to idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Brain 133: 23–32.
  8. 8. Helbig I, Mefford HC, Sharp AJ, Guipponi M, Fichera M, et al. (2009) 15q13.3 microdeletions increase risk of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Nat Genet 41: 160–162.
  9. 9. Mefford HC, Muhle H, Ostertag P, von Spiczak S, Buysse K, et al. (2010) Genome-Wide Copy Number Variation in Epilepsy: Novel Susceptibility Loci in Idiopathic Generalized and Focal Epilepsies. PLoS Genet 6: e1000962.
  10. 10. Heinzen EL, Radtke RA, Urban TJ, Cavalleri GL, Depondt C, et al. (2010) Rare deletions at 16p13.11 predispose to a diverse spectrum of sporadic epilepsy syndromes. Am J Hum Genet 86: 707–718.
  11. 11. Feng Y, Olson EC, Stukenberg PT, Flanagan LA, Kirschner MW, et al. (2000) LIS1 regulates CNS lamination by interacting with mNudE, a central component of the centrosome. Neuron 28: 665–679.
  12. 12. Feng Y, Walsh CA (2004) Mitotic spindle regulation by NDE1 controls cerebral cortical size. Neuron 44: 279–293.
  13. 13. Pawlisz AS, Mutch C, Wynshaw-Boris A, Chenn A, Walsh CA, et al. (2008) Lis1-NDE1 1-dependent neuronal fate control determines cerebral cortical size and lamination. Hum Molec Genet 17: 2441–2445.
  14. 14. Lam C, Vergnolle MA, Thorpe L, Woodman PG, Allan VJ (2010) Functional interplay between LIS1, NDE1 and NDEL1 in dynein-dependent organelle positioning. J Cell Sci 123: 202–212.
  15. 15. Sasaki S, Shionoya A, Ishida M, Gambello M, Yingling J, et al. (2000) A LIS1/NUDEL/cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain complex in the developing and adult nervous system. Neuron 28: 681–696.
  16. 16. Vergnolle MA, Taylor SS (2007) Cenp-F links kinetochores to Ndel1/Nde1/Lis1/dynein microtubule motor complexes. Curr Biol 17: 1173–1179.
  17. 17. Howell BJ, McEwen BF, Canman JC, Hoffman DB, Farrar EM, et al. (2001) Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J Cell Biol 155: 1159–1172.
  18. 18. Inouse S, Turgeon BG, Yoder OC, Aist JR (1998) Role of fungal dynein in hyphal growth, microtubule organization, spindle pole body motility and nuclear migration. J Cell Sci 111: 1555–1566.
  19. 19. Karki S, Holzbaur EL (1999) Cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin in cell division and intracellular transport. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11: 45–53.
  20. 20. Pawlisz AS, Feng Y (2011) Three-dimensional regulation of radial glial functions by Lis1-Nde1 and dystrophin glycoprotein complexes. PLoS Biol 9: e1001172.
  21. 21. Siller KH, Serr M, Steward R, Hays TS, Doe CQ (2005) Live imaging of Drosophila brain neuroblasts reveals a role for Lis1/dynactin in spindle assembly and mitotic checkpoint control. Mol Biol Cell 16: 5127–5140.
  22. 22. Sasaki S, Mori D, Toyo-oka K, Chen A, Garrett-Beal L, et al. (2005) Complete loss of Ndel1 results in neuronal migration defects and early embryonic lethality. Mol Cell Biol 25: 7812–7827.
  23. 23. Ramalingam A, Zhou XG, Fiedler SD, Brawner SJ, Joyce JM, et al. (2011) 16p13.11 duplication is a risk factor for a wide spectrum of neuropsychiatric disorders. J Hum Genet 56: 541–544.
  24. 24. Dobyns WB, Elias ER, Newlin A, Pagon RA, Ledbetter DH (1992) Causal heterogeneity in isolated lissencephaly. Neurology 42: 1375–1388.
  25. 25. Lo Nigro C, Chong CS, Smith AC, Dobyns WB, Carrozzo R, et al. (1997) Point mutations and an intragenic deletion in LIS1, the lissencephaly causative gene in isolated lissencephaly sequence and Miller-Dieker syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 6: 157–164.
  26. 26. Alkuraya FS, Cai X, Emery C, Mochida GH, Al-Dosari , et al. (2011) Human mutations in NDE1 cause extreme microcephaly with Lissencephaly. Am J Hum Genet 88: 536–547.
  27. 27. Bakircioglu M, Carvalho OP, Khurshid M, Cox JJ, Tuysuz B, et al. (2011) The essential role of centrosomal NDE1 in human cerebral cortex neurogenesis. Am J Hum Genet 88: 523–535.
  28. 28. Nagamani SC, Erez A, Bader P, Lalani SR, Scott DA, et al. (2011) Phenotypic manifestations of copy number variation in chromosome 16p13.11. Eur J Hum Genet 19: 280–286.
  29. 29. Scaravilli F (1998) Neuropathology of Epilepsy. Issue 1824. United Kingdom: Publisher World Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd.
  30. 30. Wolf HK, Wellmer J, Müller MB, Wiestler OD, Hufnagel A, et al. (1995) Glioneuronal malformative lesions and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors in patients with chronic pharmacoresistant epilepsies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 54: 245–254.
  31. 31. Thom M, Sisodiya SM, Beckett A, Martinian L, Lin WR, et al. (2002) Cytoarchitectural abnormalities in hippocampal sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 61: 510–519.
  32. 32. Ferrer I, Tuñón T, Soriano E, del Rio A, Iraizoz I, et al. (1992) Calbindin immunoreactivity in normal human temporal neocortex. Brain Res 572: 33–41.
  33. 33. Hadjivassiliou G, Martinian L, Squier W, Blumcke I, Aronica E, et al. (2010) The application of cortical layer markers in the evaluation of cortical dysplasias in epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol 120: 517–528.
  34. 34. Molnár Z, Cheung AF (2006) Towards the classification of subpopulations of layer V pyramidal projection neurons. Neurosci Res 55: 105–515.
  35. 35. Thom M, Martinian L, Parnavelas JG, Sisodiya SM (2004) Distribution of cortical interneurons in grey matter heterotopia in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 45: 916–923.
  36. 36. Bandtlow CE, Dlaska M, Pirker S, Czech T, Baumgartner C, et al. (2004) Increased expression of Nogo-A in hippocampal neurons of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Eur J Neurosci 20: 195–206.
  37. 37. Blumcke I, Schewe JC, Normann S, Brustle O, Schramm J, et al. (2001) Increase of nestin-immunoreactive neural precursor cells in the dentate gyrus of pediatric patients with early-onset temporal lobe epilepsy. Hippocampus 11: 311–321.
  38. 38. Lendahl U, Zimmerman LB, McKay RD (1990) CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein. Cell 60: 585–595.
  39. 39. Martinian L, Boer K, Middeldorp J, Hol EM, Sisodiya SM, et al. (2009) Expression patterns of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-delta in epilepsy-associated lesional pathologies. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 35: 394–405.
  40. 40. Roelofs RF, Fischer DF, Houtman SH, Sluijs JA, Van Haren W, et al. (2005) Adult human subventricular, subgranular, and subpial zones contain astrocytes with a specialized intermediate filament cytoskeleton. Glia 52: 289–300.
  41. 41. Gleeson JG, Lin PT, Flanagan LA, Walsh CA (1999) Doublecortin is a microtubule-associated protein and is expressed widely by migrating neurons. Neuron 23: 257–271.
  42. 42. Ocbina P, Dizon M, Shin L, Szele F (2006) Doublecortin is necessary for the migration of adult subventricular zone cells from neurospheres. Mol Cell Neurosci 33: 126–135.
  43. 43. Gong C, Wang T-W, Huang HS, Parent JM (2007) Reelin regulates neuronal progenitor migration in intact and epileptic hippocampus. J Neurosci 27: 1803–1811.
  44. 44. Sisodiya SM, Lin WR, Harding BN, Squier MV, Thom M (2002) Drug resistance in epilepsy: expression of drug resistance proteins in common causes of refractory epilepsy. Brain 125: 22–31.
  45. 45. Liu JY, Martinian L, Thom M, Sisodiya SM (2010) Immunolabeling recovery in archival, post-mortem, human brain tissue using modified antigen retrieval and the catalyzed signal amplification system. J Neurosci Methods 190: 49–56.
  46. 46. Catarino CB, Kasperavičiūtė D, Thom M, Cavalleri GL, Martinian L, et al. (2011) Genomic microdeletions associated with epilepsy: not a contraindication to resective surgery. Epilepsia 52: 1388–1392.
  47. 47. Thom M (2009) Hippocampal sclerosis: progress since Sommer. Brain Pathol 19: 565–572.
  48. 48. Shmueli A, Segal M, Sapir T, Tsutsumi R, Noritake J, et al. (2010) Ndel1 palmitoylation: a new mean to regulate cytoplasmic dynein activity. EMBO J 29: 107–119.
  49. 49. Derewenda U, Tarricone C, Choi WC, Cooper DR, Lukasik S, et al. (2007) The structure of the coiled-coil domain of Ndel1 and the basis of its interaction with Lis1, the causal protein of Miller-Dieker lissencephaly. Structure 15: 1467–1481.