Brachial circumference (BC), also known as upper arm or mid arm circumference, can be used as an indicator of muscle mass and fat tissue, which are distributed differently in men and women. Analysis of anthropometric measures of peripheral fat distribution such as BC could help in understanding the complex pathophysiology behind overweight and obesity. The purpose of this study is to identify genetic variants associated with BC through a large-scale genome-wide association scan (GWAS) meta-analysis. We used fixed-effects meta-analysis to synthesise summary results across 14 GWAS discovery and 4 replication cohorts comprising overall 22,376 individuals (12,031 women and 10,345 men) of European ancestry. Individual analyses were carried out for men, women, and combined across sexes using linear regression and an additive genetic model: adjusted for age and adjusted for age and BMI. We prioritised signals for follow-up in two-stages. We did not detect any signals reaching genome-wide significance. The FTO rs9939609 SNP showed nominal evidence for association (p<0.05) in the age-adjusted strata for men and across both sexes. In this first GWAS meta-analysis for BC to date, we have not identified any genome-wide significant signals and do not observe robust association of previously established obesity loci with BC. Large-scale collaborations will be necessary to achieve higher power to detect loci underlying BC.
Citation: Boraska V, Day-Williams A, Franklin CS, Elliott KS, Panoutsopoulou K, Tachmazidou I, et al. (2012) Genome-Wide Association Study to Identify Common Variants Associated with Brachial Circumference: A Meta-Analysis of 14 Cohorts. PLoS ONE 7(3): e31369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031369
Editor: Stacey Cherny, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Received: October 25, 2011; Accepted: January 9, 2012; Published: March 29, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Boraska et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: Vesna Boraska is supported by Unity Through Knowledge Fund CONNECTIVITY PROGRAM (“Gaining Experience” Grant 2A), The National Foundation for Science, Higher Education and Technological Development of the Republic of Croatia (BRAIN GAIN- Postdoc fellowship) and the Wellcome Trust (098051). Eleftheria Zeggini is supported by the Wellcome Trust (098051). ALSPAC: ALSPAC is jointly funded by the University of Bristol, Wellcome Trust and MRC. Current renewal grant numbers: WT092731 and G9815508. BUSSELTON: The Busselton Health Study acknowledges the generous support for the 1994/5 follow-up study from Healthway, Western Australia. The Busselton Health Study is supported by The Great Wine Estates of the Margaret River region of Western Australia. The study gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the Western Australian DNA Bank (National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Enabling Facility) with DNA samples and the support provided by the The Ark at UWA for this study. CoLaus-Hercules: The CoLaus study received financial contributions from GlaxoSmithKline, the Faculty of Biology and Medicine of Lausanne, and the Swiss National Science Foundation (33CSCO-122661). Murielle Bochud is supported by the Swiss School of Public Health Plus. CROATIA-Korcula: The CROATIA-Korcula study was funded by grants from the Medical Research Council (UK), and Republic of Croatia Ministry of Science, Education and Sports research (108-1080315-0302). The SNP genotyping for the CROATIA-Korcula cohort was performed in Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. CROATIA-Split: The CROATIA-Split study is funded by grants from the Medical Research Council (UK) and Republic of Croatia Ministry of Science, Education and Sports research grants to I.R. (108-1080315-0302). The SNP genotyping for the CROATIA-Split cohort was performed by AROS Applied Biotechnology, Aarhus, Denmark. CROATIA-Vis: The CROATIA-Vis study was funded by grants from the Medical Research Council (UK), European Commission Framework 6 project EUROSPAN (Contract No. LSHG-CT-2006-018947) and Republic of Croatia Ministry of Science, Education and Sports research grants (108-1080315-0302). The SNP genotyping for the CROATIA-Vis cohort was performed in the core genotyping laboratory of the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility at the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. FamHS: The Family Heart Study (FamHS) was supported by NIH grants R01-HL-087700, R01-HL-088215 (Michael A. Province) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and R01-DK-8925601, R01-DK-075681 (Ingrid B. Borecki) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). HUNT: Bendik S. Winsvold is funded from the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Norway. Verneri Anttila is funded from the Wellcome Trust (grant number WT089062; www.wellcome.ac.uk) and the Finnish Cultural Foundation (www.skr.fi). HYPERGENES: HYPERGENES (European Network for Genetic-Epidemiological Studies: Building a method to dissect complex genetic traits, using essential hypertension as a disease model) is a Large Cooperative Project funded by EU within the FP7 (HEALTH-F4-2007-201550). InCHIANTI: The InCHIANTI study baseline (1998-2000) was supported as a “targeted project” (ICS110.1/RF97.71) by the Italian Ministry of Health and in part by the U.S. National Institute on Aging (Contracts: 263 MD 9164 and 263 MD 821336); the InCHIANTI Follow-up 1 (2001-2003) was funded by the U.S. National Institute on Aging (Contracts: N.1-AG-1-1 and N.1-AG-1-2111); the InCHIANTI Follow-ups 2 and 3 studies (2004-2010) were financed by the U.S. National Institute on Aging (Contract: N01-AG-5-0002); supported in part by the Intramural research program of the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland. JRBP is funded by a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (092447/Z/10/Z). KORA: The KORA Augsburg studies were financed by the Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany (http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de) and supported by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (http://www.bmbf.de). Part of this work was financed by the German National Genome Research Network (NGFN-2, NGFNPlus 01GS0823 and 01GS0834) (http://www.ngfn.de). Our research was supported within the Munich Center of Health Sciences (MC Health) as part of LMUinnovativ (http://www.mc-health.uni-muenchen.de). Cornelia Huth was supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) to the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.). MICROS: In South Tyrol, the study was supported by the Ministry of Health and Department of Educational Assistance, University and Research of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano, and the South Tyrolean Sparkasse Foundation. RAINE: The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Grant ID 572613, ID 403981 and ID 353514; URL: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/), The Western Australian Health Promotion Foundation (URL: http://www.healthway.wa.gov.au/) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-82893; URL: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html). The authors gratefully acknowledge the NH&MRC for their long term contribution to funding the study over the last 20 years and also the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research for long term support of the study. The following Institutions are acknowledged for providing funding for Core Management of the Raine Study: The University of Western Australia (UWA), Raine Medical Research Foundation, UWA Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Women and Infants Research Foundation and Curtin University. SHIP: SHIP (BMBF), Henry Völzke (public funding from Federal Ministry of Education and Research). SHIP is part of the Community Medicine Research net of the University of Greifswald, Germany, which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grants no. 01ZZ9603, 01ZZ0103, and 01ZZ0403), the Ministry of Cultural Affairs as well as the Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. Genome-wide data have been supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 03ZIK012) and a joint grant from Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany and the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. The University of Greifswald is a member of the “Center of Knowledge Interchange” program of the Siemens AG. TEENAGE: This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund – ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund. TwinFat: Helsinki University Hospital Research Funds, grants from Novo Nordisk, Gyllenberg, Biomedicum Helsinki, Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation, and Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research. Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics. The European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), ENGAGE Consortium, grant agreement HEALTH-F4-2007- 201413. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The following commercial companies helped support this study: GlaxoSmithKline, Siemens Healthcare, Siemens AG, Novo Nordisk, Gyllenberg and Biomedicum Helsinki. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Brachial circumference (BC) is a composite measure of muscle mass, skeletal size and fat tissue , . BC has been widely used in epidemiological and clinical studies as a proxy for body composition . Analysis of anthropometric measures of peripheral fat distribution like BC could help in understanding complex phenotypes such as overweight and obesity that can lead to the development of chronic diseases, for example type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease , , . Research of upper and lower body fat association with diabetes in families of African origin suggested that arm and leg fat could be used as obesity-related phenotypes in association studies . Obesity in children can also lead to development of chronic diseases such as hyperlipidaemia, hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, and early atherosclerosis later on in life . It was shown that BC closely reflects body fat mass in children and adolescents and its use was recommended as a screening method for prediction of obesity and overweight , . Moreover, BC has been used for decades for the assessment of nutritional status of children in developing countries and has also been proposed as a tool for monitoring nutritional status and weight in the elderly , , , . Peripheral and overall fat distribution, assessed through body mass index (BMI), is partly modulated through different genetic effects .
There are differences in the amount and distribution pattern of soft tissue between sexes. In general, men have higher total body lean tissue and lower percent body fat whereas women have higher total body fat and a lower proportion of lean tissue in the upper body , , , , . Women have more subcutaneous fat than men over the buttocks and thighs and behind the upper arms . In addition, it was recently shown that diabetic women of African ancestry have a higher proportion of fat deposited in their arms than diabetic men . Due to the effects of sex hormones but also due to heavier physical activity and involvement in more power sports, men have larger muscle size/mass and larger BC compared to women , . This may indicate that BC is a better measure of muscularity in men and adipose tissue in women. Analysis of the genetic contribution to BC in Belgian nuclear families indicated that BC is influenced by additive genetic effects (h2 = 0.57) . Miljkovic-Gacic et al also estimated high heritability of upper arm body fat storage and also pointed that genetic factors play a role in defining sexual dimorphism of lower body fat distribution in individuals of African origin . Genetic effects on fat distribution can be related to sex and in this study we aimed to evaluate sex-specific genetic associations with BC through analysis of men and women separately, as well as common associations through the analysis of a combined dataset.
Weight gain and redistribution of fat tissue, the main characteristics of aging, influence body composition and consequently affect BC . The decrease in BC that is observed in elderly men and women points to substantial subcutaneous fat loss and redistribution of fat from extremity to trunk . Additionally, aging is also characterised by loss in skeletal muscle mass, known as sarcopenia , . To account for these effects of aging on BC we adjusted all our analyses for the age of individuals.
In summary, BC is a measure of both adiposity and muscularity . This study aimed to identify shared and sex-specific genetic variants associated with BC through a large-scale genome-wide association scan (GWAS) meta-analysis.
Materials and Methods
Discovery dataset: sample characteristics
We conducted genome-wide meta-analysis across 14 discovery datasets, comprising a total of 18,753 individuals (8,961 men, 9,792 women) of European ancestry. BC measurement was taken uniformly across studies; it was measured in mm using non-elastic tape that was wrapped around the upper arm, at the medium of the upper arm length i.e. at the midpoint between the acromion and the olecranon. BC was normally distributed. Individuals that had BC higher or lower than 3 standard deviations from the mean were removed from each dataset prior to conducting association analysis. Sample characteristics across all datasets are presented in Table 1. Detailed sample characteristics on men and women separately are presented in Table S1. A bar chart of BC measures across studies is presented in Figure S1.
Each study obtained ethical approval from their respective research ethics committee and all participants gave signed informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Genotyping, imputation and quality control
All samples were genotyped using commercially available Illumina (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) or Affymetrix (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) platforms. Imputation of untyped variants was based on HapMap Phase II data for the CEU population. Quality control (QC) of directly typed and imputed variants was conducted separately in each study. Study-specific information on genotyping platform, imputation method and QC metrics is presented in Table S2.
Genome-wide association analysis in contributing studies
Association analysis was performed in each study separately. Analyses were performed for directly typed and imputed autosomal variants using linear regression and an additive genetic model, adjusted for age and adjusted for age and BMI, in men and women separately. Specifically, four types of analyses were carried out: women – age adjusted, women – age and BMI adjusted, men - age adjusted, men – age and BMI adjusted. By adjusting a set of our analyses with BMI we aim to differentiate the effects of loci solely influencing regional adiposity and/or muscularity. BC changes throughout the life and by adjusting analyses for age we aim to exclude the effect of age on BC. Association analyses of imputed variants took genotype uncertainty into account. Where necessary, the first three genotype-based principal components were used as covariates. Studies with related individuals additionally adjusted analyses for family relatedness using linear mixed models. Association analysis software for each study is presented in Table S2. Sensitivity analysis excluding the two studies comprised of adolescent individuals (ALSPAC and RAINE) was also carried out, to exclude potential effects of genes that might be involved in body development and growth during adolescence. We also investigated the effects of 54 previously established genetic loci associated with overall adiposity, assessed through BMI and other measures of fat distribution such as waist-to-hip ratio, and peripheral adiposity, and of 64 previously established T2D loci and 41 loci influencing glycaemic traits with BC in discovery dataset.
We performed six fixed-effects meta-analyses to synthesize summary statistics across 14 datasets using GWAMA . Meta-analyses were performed separately in men and women but also in the combined set. Prior to meta-analysis we excluded SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) lower than 0.05 and SNPs with low imputation accuracy scores. We used a cut-off of rsq_hat <0.3 for genotypes imputed with MACH  software and a cut-off of proper info score <0.5 for IMPUTE  software. The number of directly genotyped and imputed SNPs that passed QC criteria across all studies and were subsequently meta-analysed is presented for each meta-analysis in Table S3. The genomic control (GC) inflation factor was calculated and applied to the results for each study separately, prior to the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results were also corrected for overall GC. We investigated evidence of heterogeneity using the I2 statistic . We created quantile-quantile (QQ) and Manhattan plots to visualise genome-wide association results.
Replication stage 1
On the basis of the GWAS meta-analysis results we conducted a two-stage follow-up of prioritised SNPs in independent datasets. The study design is presented in Figure 1.
We selected 31 SNPs for initial in silico replication: we focused on SNPs with p-values below or close to 10−5 and additionally examined their genomic location, prioritising those within or near biologically interesting genes. When there were many SNPs with p-values below 10−5 in the same genomic region we selected the two most significant variants for follow-up. We visually inspected cluster plots (in studies with available intensity data) for all selected SNPs prior to replication.
Replication stage 1 samples included 967 subjects from the Family Heart Study (FamHS) (Table 1 and Table S2) . We combined summary statistics for 31 directly typed and imputed SNPs across the discovery and stage 1 replication studies using fixed-effects meta-analysis. We performed the same sets of analyses as described for the discovery dataset.
Replication stage 2
On the basis of meta-analysis results across the discovery and replication stage 1 datasets, and taking into account the results of our sensitivity analyses, we prioritised a subset of 22 SNPs for the second round of replication. SNPs were selected primarily on the basis of their overall statistical significance. We also selected the established obesity variant rs9939609 in FTO to assess its association with BC in a larger sample size. Overall, 23 SNPs were taken forward for de novo genotyping in the Greek TEENs of Attica: Genes & Environment (TEENAGE) study and in silico replication in two studies, the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT)  and TwinFat , . The main reason for conducting two stage replication was to refine significance of initially prioritised SNPs using in silico data (replication stage 1) and to select a subset of SNPs with greater evidence of association to fit one genotyping multiplex (iPLEX™ Gold Assay) for de novo genotyping in the TEENAGE cohort (replication stage 2). Two studies with in silico data (HUNT and TwinFat) joined the analysis at the advanced stage of replication stage 2.
TEENAGE cohort. The TEENAGE cohort consists of 819 adolescent students attending all three classes of public secondary schools in the Attica region of Greece (Table 1). Genotyping of the 23 prioritised SNPs was performed using the iPLEX™ Gold Assay (Sequenom® Inc.). Assays for two SNPs (rs7837164 and rs4833582) could not be designed, therefore their proxies (rs4831616 and rs10018120 with r2 = 1 and r2 = 1, respectively) were genotyped instead. Assays for all SNPs were designed using the eXTEND suite and MassARRAY Assay Design software version 3.1 (Sequenom® Inc.). Amplification was performed in a total volume of 5 µL containing ∼0.06–0.4 ng genomic DNA, 100 nM of each PCR primer, 500 µM of each dNTP, 1.25× PCR buffer (Qiagen), 1.625 mM MgCl2 and 1 U HotStar Taq® (Qiagen). Reactions were heated to 94°C for 15 min followed by 45 cycles at 94°C for 20 s, 56°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min, then a final extension at 72°C for 3 min. Unincorporated dNTPs were SAP digested prior to iPLEX™ Gold allele specific extension with mass-modified ddNTPs using an iPLEX Gold reagent kit (Sequenom® Inc.). SAP digestion and extension were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions with reaction extension primer concentrations adjusted to between 0.7–1.8 µM, dependent upon primer mass. Extension products were desalted and dispensed onto a SpectroCHIP using a MassARRAY Nanodispenser prior to MALDI-TOF analysis with a MassARRAY Analyzer Compact mass spectrometer. Genotypes were automatically assigned and manually confirmed using MassARRAY TyperAnalyzer software version 4.0 (Sequenom® Inc.).
We applied the following sample/SNP QC exclusions for these de novo genotype data: sex inconsistencies, sample call rate <98% and exact HWE p-value<0.0001. The average assay call rate was 0.993. Overall, 806 samples and 23 SNPs passed our QC criteria in the TEENAGE replication cohort. Linear regression analysis under an additive genetic model, taking into account age and age and BMI in each stratum (men, women and combined set), was carried out using Plink .
We performed meta-analysis for the 23 prioritised SNPs across the discovery and all replication datasets, comprising a total of 22,376 individuals (12,031 women and 10,345 men). We performed the same six sets of analyses as described for the discovery dataset. Power for the global meta-analysis was calculated using Quanto .
We did not observe an excess of signals in the six meta-analyses that were carried out. QQ and Manhattan plots for combined analysis (adjusted for age and adjusted for age and BMI) are shown in Figure 2. QQ and Manhattan plots for men and women are shown in Figure S2.
Of the 31 SNPs initially taken forward, 4 showed association with p<0.05 in replication set 1. Twenty one of 31 signals had effects in the same direction as the discovery GWAS meta-analysis (binomial p-value = 0.07, given we expect 50% of signals to be in the same direction by chance) (Table S4). Of the 23 SNPs prioritised for stage 2 replication, 12 had effects in the same direction as the GWAS meta-analysis (binomial p-value = 1) and 1 SNP achieved p<0.05 in replication set 2 (Table S4).
There were no genome-wide significant findings in the global meta-analysis of prioritised SNPs across all discovery and replication samples (Table S4). Global meta-analysis results with the greatest evidence of association (p≤0.001) are displayed in Table 2. We created forest plots for SNPs with p-value≤0.001 with studies ordered by increasing age (Figure S3). Our study had 90% power at the genome-wide significance level (p = 5×10−8) to detect SNPs that explain 0.5% of the genetic variance in men (total n = 10,345), 0.4% in women (total n = 12,031) and 0.2% in the combined set (total n = 22,376).
We compared the effect sizes of the initially prioritised 31 SNPs between sexes in the discovery dataset. The effect sizes of loci arising from the combined analyses across men and women are comparable. However, we found heterogeneity in the effect estimates between sexes for the loci prioritized on the basis of the male-only or female-only analyses (Table S5).
The rs9939609 FTO SNP showed nominal evidence for association in the age adjusted strata in men and in the combined set across both sexes (Table 3). The adjustment for BMI almost totally eliminates the effect of FTO on BC which is visible through a ten-fold decrease of beta values (Table 3). If the FTO BC effect were of the same magnitude as the rs9939609 FTO SNP effect on BMI  our study would have >90% power at the genome-wide significance level to detect it in the combined set, 57% power in women and 40% power in men. We additionally examined 53 previously associated obesity (BMI, waist to hip ratio, weight) SNPs with BC and found 20 SNPs showing p<0.05, across six different strata in the discovery panel (binomial p = 0.175). The most associated SNP was rs6548238 from the TMEM18 gene with p = 8.15×10−4 in the age adjusted stratum across both sexes. Association analysis results for all 53 SNPs are presented in Table S6.
We examined the association of 64 previously established T2D loci with BC in our discovery cohort and found 25 SNPs showing p<0.05, across six different strata in the discovery panel (binomial p = 0.11) (Table S7). We also examined 41 previously established SNPs that influence glycaemic traits (fasting glucose, fasting insulin, glycated haemoglobin, 2 h glucose test) and found 12 SNPs with p<0.05, across six different strata in the discovery panel (binomial p = 0.576) (Table S8).
In this large-scale GWAS meta-analysis of BC we analysed a total of 22,376 individuals (12,031 women and 10,345 men) of European ancestry across 14 GWAS discovery datasets and 4 replication cohorts. We followed-up signals from various strata in a two stage replication effort but found no signals reaching genome-wide significance.
Our study had 90% power to detect SNPs that explain 0.2% of the genetic variance in the combined set i.e. our study is well powered to detect modest effects at common loci at the genome-wide significance level (e.g. a risk allele with frequency 0.35 and per-allele increase of 2 mm of BC). One of the weaknesses of this study is that BC is not a clearly-characterised phenotype because it is essentially a composite of muscle mass, skeletal size and fat tissue, traits with distribution differences between sexes , . In order to decrease potential misclassification of the phenotype and to search for sex-specific BC effects we conducted analyses in men and women separately. We also analysed the more powerful, combined dataset in the search for shared loci underlying BC. Our study focused on common variants only and has not examined the effect of low frequency and rare variants on BC.
All association analyses were adjusted for age since BC varies throughout the life of individuals. In young individuals BC may be particularly different since it may reflect body development and growth during adolescence. To avoid associations that may arise because BC in adolescents might not be comparable with the phenotypic measure of middle-aged and elder individuals, we performed a sensitivity analysis by excluding studies with adolescent participants. The results of our sensitivity analysis were qualitatively similar to the results from the full-set discovery meta-analysis (data not shown).
We have also examined the effects of top loci across all strata in the discovery dataset in order to compare effect sizes between sexes (Table S5). As expected, the effect sizes of loci prioritized based on the combined male and female analyses are comparable between men and women. However, when we examined the effect estimates of loci prioritised on the basis of a specific sex analysis in the opposite sex, we mainly observe heterogeneity i.e. effect sizes from one sex analyses greatly differ in size or direction in the other sex. This is corroborated with statistical evidence for heterogeneity as evaluated through the I2 measure. This may explain why the combined analyses of these loci did not result in improved or genome-wide significance. This additionally confirms that the BC measure has different properties in men and women.
One of the aims of this study was to investigate if established obesity and other fat distribution-associated loci also regulate peripheral adiposity. We expected to see some overlap, since BC is correlated with BMI (Table 1), but also to potentially detect new loci that may explain the properties of peripheral adiposity since fat is disproportionally distributed over the body. We examined the well-established BMI-associated FTO gene variant ,  in our dataset consisting of 21,414 individuals and did not find strong evidence for association with BC. On the basis of anthropometric and animal model research it is shown that the FTO gene is primarily associated with fat mass , . This may explain the fact that we observe only nominal association with BC, since BC is a composite measure of, both lean and fat mass. Of the 53 previously established obesity/adiposity loci we examined in the discovery dataset, only one had p<0.001 (rs6548238 SNP in the TMEM18, p = 8.15×10−4 in the combined-age adjusted set). Variants in the TMEM18 gene were previously associated with BMI, body weight and increased risk of childhood obesity , , . Willer et al showed that associations of the TMEM18 gene with BMI are, similarly as for the FTO gene, driven by increased fat mass .
We have also investigated if established T2D loci and loci implicated in glycaemic traits are associated with BC. We did not detect strong evidence for association with BC. Only one previously established T2D variant (rs11899863 in the THADA gene) had p = 0.001 in the men age-and-BMI adjusted set. This gene was previously associated with thyroid adenomas  and recently with gestational weight gain .
Within the power constraints of our study, the data suggest that BC is not a good surrogate measure for overall adiposity genetics. To get a better measure of muscularity we employed BMI adjustments for a subset of our analyses, assuming that BMI is an indirect measure of overall adiposity. This interpretation may not be straightforward because BMI is stature-dependent and may reflect lean tissue as well , . No genome-wide replicating associations were identified.
In this large-scale GWAS meta-analysis for BC we have not identified any signals reaching genome-wide significance and do not observe robust association of previously established obesity loci with BC. This may indicate that peripheral adiposity, measured through BC, does not share similar biological patterns with overall adiposity, measured through BMI, and that BC is not a good measure of peripheral adiposity but mainly reflects muscularity. We have also carried out six stratified analyses, which although non-independent give rise to multiplicity issues. Any significant or nominal associations would therefore need to be interpreted with added caution. Large-scale collaborative efforts will be required to achieve the necessary power to detect loci underpinning BC, and detailed anthropometry will help deconvolute the determinants of muscularity, adiposity and their distributions.
A bar chart of BC measures across studies.
Manhattan and QQ plots based on meta-analyses results of the discovery panel: a) women – age adjusted, b) women – age and BMI adjusted, c) men - age adjusted, d) men – age and BMI adjusted.
Forest plots for global meta-analysis SNPs with p-value≤0.001 with studies ordered by increasing age (the top study contains the youngest individuals). This comparison can indicate the presence of age effects on associations with BC. We have not found clear evidence of age effects on BC. Box areas are proportional to study sample size.
Detailed sample characteristics on men, women and combined set.
Study-specific information on genotyping platform, imputation method and QC metrics.
The number of directly genotyped and imputed meta-analysed SNPs.
Discovery dataset, replication stage 1 and 2 and global-meta-analysis results of prioritised SNPs. CHR - chromosome; POS - position; EA - effect allele; NEA - non-effect allele; EAF - effect allele frequency; SE - standard error; P - p-value; I2- measure of heterogeneity; N - total number of samples (22 stage 2 replication SNPs are shown in bold).
Comparison of effect sizes of top results between sexes in the discovery dataset. CHR - chromosome; POS - position; EA - effect allele; NEA - non-effect allele; EAF - effect allele frequency; SE - standard error; P - p-value; I2- measure of heterogeneity; N - total number of samples.
Association of established obesity SNPs with BC. CHR - chromosome; POS - position; EA - effect allele; NEA - non-effect allele; EAF - effect allele frequency; SE- standard error; P - p-value; I2- measure of heterogeneity; N - total number of samples (p-values<0.05 in bold).
Association of established T2D loci. CHR - chromosome; POS - position; EA - effect allele; NEA - non-effect allele; EAF - effect allele frequency; SE- standard error; P - p-value; I2- measure of heterogeneity; N - total number of samples (p-values<0.05 in bold).* SNP rs7564886 is a proxy for originally associated T2D SNP rs7578597 (r2 = 1).
Association of loci influencing glycemic traits. CHR - chromosome; POS - position; EA - effect allele; NEA - non-effect allele; EAF - effect allele frequency; SE- standard error; P - p-value; I2- measure of heterogeneity; N - total number of samples (p-values<0.05 in bold);FGlu - fasting glucose; FIns - fasting insulin; 2 hrGlu - 2 h after glucose challenge; HbA1C - glycated hemoglobin.
The authors are grateful to Mark McCarthy, Loukas Moutsianas, Inês Barroso and Katherine I Morley for their helpful contribution.
ALSPAC: We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. This publication is the work of the authors (Nicholas Timpson, David M. Evans, Beate St Pourcain, George Davey Smith, Debbie A. Lawlor, Sue Ring) and will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper.
BUSSELTON: The Busselton Health Study acknowledges the numerous Busselton community volunteers who assisted with data collection and the study participants from the Shire of Busselton. The study gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the Western Australian DNA Bank (NHMRC Enabling Facility) with DNA samples.
CoLaus-Hercules: The authors express their gratitude to the participants in the Lausanne CoLaus study and to the investigators who have contributed to the recruitment. The authors thank Peter Vollenweider, Gerard Waeber, Vincent Mooser and Dawn Waterworth, Co-PIs of the CoLaus study. Special thanks to Yolande Barreau, Mathieu Firmann, Vladimir Mayor, Anne-Lise Bastian, Binasa Ramic, Martine Moranville, Martine Baumer, Marcy Sagette, Jeanne Ecoffey, Sylvie Mermoud, Gilles Wandeler, Jerome Jaunin and Heba Alwan for data collection.
CROATIA-Korcula: We would like to acknowledge the staff of several institutions in Croatia that helped with the field work, including but not limited to The University of Split and Zagreb Medical Schools and Croatian Institute for Public Health.
CROATIA-Split: We would like to acknowledge the staff of several institutions in Croatia that helped with the field work, including but not limited to The University of Split and Zagreb Medical Schools and Croatian Institute for Public Health.
CROATIA-Vis: We would like to acknowledge the staff of several institutions in Croatia that helped with the field work, including but not limited to The University of Split and Zagreb Medical Schools, Institute for Anthropological Research in Zagreb and Croatian Institute for Public Health.
HUNT: The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU, Verdal), Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Nord-Trøndelag County Council.
HYPERGENES: To HYPERGENES consortium took part: HYPERGENES Steering Committee with Daniele Cusi (project coordinator), Jacques Beckmann, Fabio Macciardi, Amnon Shabo, Jan A. Staessen, Paolo Vineis and Enrico Rosario Alessi. HYPERGENES ethical steering group with Gilberto Corbellini, Aldona Dembinska-Kiec, Jantina de Vries, Alex Mauron and Guido Pennings (1) University of Milano and Fondazione Filarete with Daniele Cusi, Fabio Macciardi, Andrea Stucchi, Cristina Barlassina, Erika Salvi, Francesca Frau, Sara Lupoli, Federica Rizzi, Andrea Calabria, Maurizio Marconi, Gianna Petrini, Vincenzo Toschi, Giancarlo Mariotti, Maurizio Turiel; (2) University of Leuven, Division of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, with Robert Fagard, Yu Jin, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Tom Richart, Jan A. Staessen, and Lutgarde Thijs; (3) Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, with Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz, Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek, Agnieszka Olszanecka, Wiktoria Wojciechowska, Małgorzata Kloch-Badełek; (4) IBM Israel – Science and Technology LTD, with Amnon Shabo, Ariel Frakash, Simona Cohen, Boaz Carmeli, Dan Pelleg, Michal Rosen-Zvi, Hani Neuvrith-Telem; (5) I.M.S. – Istituto di Management Sanitario S.r.l., Milan, with Pietro Conti, Costanza Conti, Mariella D'Alessio; (6) Institute of Internal Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Science, Novosibirsk, with Yuri Nikitin, Galina Simonova, Sofia Malyutina, Elena Pello; (7) Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, with Paolo Vineis and Clive J Hoggart; (8) INSERM – Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U772, with Xavier Jeunemaitre, Pierre-François Plouin, Michel Azizi (9) University of Warwick. Cardiovascular Medicine & Epidemiology Group, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, with Francesco P Cappuccio, Michelle A Miller, Chen Ji; (10) Università degli Studi di Sassari-AOU. Hypertension and Cardiovascular 22 Prevention Centre, with Nicola Glorioso, Giuseppe Argiolas, Silvia Pitzoi, Emanuela Bulla, Roberta Zaninello, Patrizia Bulla, Simone Fadda, Gianclaudia Cappai, Siria Motroni, Chiara Maria Troffa; (11) STMICROELECTRONICS SRL, with Tony Barbuzzi, Maria Grazia Amore and Enrico Rosario Alessi (12) University of Lausanne. Department of Medical Genetics, with Carlo Rivolta, Jacques S. Beckmann, Zoltan Kutalik, Paola Benaglio, Sven Bergmann, Murielle Bochud, Diana Marek, and Peter Bastian; (13) Pharnext S.A.S., Paris, with Matthieu Bouaziz, Caroline Paccard, Mickaël Guedj, and Ilya Chumakov; (14) Softeco Sismat Spa, Genova, with Sefano Bianchi; (15) Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, with Jiguang Wang and Li Yan; (16) Charles University in Prague. Department of Internal Medicine II, Pilsen, with Jan Filipovsky, Jitka Seidlerova, Otto Mayer Jr., Milena Dolejsova, Jana Hirmerova, Jana Strizova; (17) University of Padova, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, with Valérie Tikhonoff; (18) Medical University of Gdansk. Hypertension Unit, Department of Hypertension and Diabetology, with Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Marzena Chrostowska, Wojciech Sakiewicz, Michal Wojtowicz, Michal Hoffmann; (19) University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, with Paolo Manunta, Chiara Lanzani, Maria Teresa Sciarrone, Lorena Citterio, Laura Zagato, Giuseppe Bianchi; (20) Licia Iacoviello, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy. Regarding the present work, cases and controls were recruited within specific cohorts/networks: FLEMENGHO/EPOGH cohort (Coordinator J Staessen, contributors Units 2,3,6,16,17,18); Wandsworth Heart & Stroke Study (WHSS, Coordinator F Cappuccio, contributing Unit 9); IMMIDIET cohort (coordinator L Iacoviello, contributing Unit 20); Milano-Sassari cohort (coordinator D Cusi, contributors Units 1,10,19); SOPHIA cohort (coordinator N Glorioso, contributing Unit 10).
InCHIANTI: We thank the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Aging who are responsible for the InCHIANTI samples. We also thank the InCHIANTI participants.
KORA: The KORA authors acknowledge the contribution of Peter Lichtner, Gertrud Eckstein, Guido Fischer, and all members of the Helmholtz Zentrum München genotyping staff for generating the SNP data, as well as all members of field staffs who were involved in the planning and conduction of the KORA Augsburg studies.
MICROS: For the MICROS study, we thank the primary care practitioners in the villages of the Val Venosta and the personnel of the Hospital of Silandro (Department of Laboratory Medicine) for their participation and collaboration in the research project.
RAINE: The authors are grateful to the Raine Study participants and their families and to the Raine Study research staff for cohort coordination and data collection. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the Western Australian DNA Bank (National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia National Enabling Facility).
SHIP: We thank all staff members and participants of the SHIP study, as well as all of the genotyping staff for generating the SHIP SNP data set. The genetic data analysis workflow was created using the Software InforSense. Genetic data were stored using the database Caché (InterSystems).
TwinFat: The TwinFAT twins are a subset of the national birth cohort studies FinnTwin12 & FinnTwin16, who have been studied intensively for body composition and metabolic traits.
Conceived and designed the experiments: EZ. Performed the experiments: VB. Analyzed the data: VB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ADW CSF KSE KP IT EA SB LJB MB GC FE DME CH AAH JH CH ALJ NK IK ZK DAL AWM MP CEP JRBP AP OP BSP SMR ES SS JAS AT NT VV NMW HY TZ LZ PA VA IBB JH IN AP KHP JW BSW GVD JK MAP JAZ MB HC DC GDS TMF CG LJP PPP IR HV HEW AFW. Wrote the paper: VB EZ.
- 1. Shimokata H, Tobin JD, Muller DC, Elahi D, Coon PJ, et al. (1989) Studies in the distribution of body fat: I. Effects of age, sex, and obesity. J Gerontol 44: M66–73.
- 2. Heyeard VH, Wagner DR (2004) Applied body composition assessment, second edition. Human Kinetics.
- 3. Chomtho S, Fewtrell MS, Jaffe A, Williams JE, Wells JC (2006) Evaluation of arm anthropometry for assessing pediatric body composition: evidence from healthy and sick children. Pediatr Res 59: 860–865.
- 4. Hughes VA, Roubenoff R, Wood M, Frontera WR, Evans WJ, et al. (2004) Anthropometric assessment of 10-y changes in body composition in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 80: 475–482.
- 5. Carey VJ, Walters EE, Colditz GA, Solomon CG, Willett WC, et al. (1997) Body fat distribution and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. The Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 145: 614–619.
- 6. Canoy D (2008) Distribution of body fat and risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. Curr Opin Cardiol 23: 591–598.
- 7. Miljkovic-Gacic I, Wang X, Kammerer CM, Bunker CH, Patrick AL, et al. (2008) Sex and genetic effects on upper and lower body fat and associations with diabetes in multigenerational families of African heritage. Metabolism 57: 819–823.
- 8. Mazicioglu MM, Hatipoglu N, Ozturk A, Cicek B, Ustunbas HB, et al. (2010) Waist circumference and mid-upper arm circumference in evaluation of obesity in children aged between 6 and 17 years. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2: 144–150.
- 9. Berkley J, Mwangi I, Griffiths K, Ahmed I, Mithwani S, et al. (2005) Assessment of severe malnutrition among hospitalized children in rural Kenya: comparison of weight for height and mid upper arm circumference. Jama 294: 591–597.
- 10. Nyirandutiye DH, Ag Iknane A, Fofana A, Brown KH (2011) Screening for acute childhood malnutrition during the national nutrition week in mali increases treatment referrals. PLoS One 6: e14818.
- 11. Ha L, Hauge T, Iversen PO (2010) Body composition in older acute stroke patients after treatment with individualized, nutritional supplementation while in hospital. BMC Geriatr 10: 75.
- 12. Heid IM, Jackson AU, Randall JC, Winkler TW, Qi L, et al. (2010) Meta-analysis identifies 13 new loci associated with waist-hip ratio and reveals sexual dimorphism in the genetic basis of fat distribution. Nat Genet 42: 949–960.
- 13. Ley CJ, Lees B, Stevenson JC (1992) Sex- and menopause-associated changes in body-fat distribution. Am J Clin Nutr 55: 950–954.
- 14. Miller AE, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, Sale DG (1993) Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 66: 254–262.
- 15. Lynch NA, Metter EJ, Lindle RS, Fozard JL, Tobin JD, et al. (1999) Muscle quality. I. Age-associated differences between arm and leg muscle groups. J Appl Physiol 86: 188–194.
- 16. Frontera WR, Hughes VA, Lutz KJ, Evans WJ (1991) A cross-sectional study of muscle strength and mass in 45- to 78-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol 71: 644–650.
- 17. Smith FW, Smith PA (2002) Musculoskeletal Differences Between Males and Females. Sports Med Arthrosc 10: 98–100.
- 18. James WP, Mascie-Taylor GC, Norgan NG, Bistrian BR, Shetty PS, et al. (1994) The value of arm circumference measurements in assessing chronic energy deficiency in Third World adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 48: 883–894.
- 19. Poveda A, Jelenkovic A, Susanne C, Rebato E (2010) Genetic contribution to variation in body configuration in Belgian nuclear families: a closer look at body lengths and circumferences. Coll Antropol 34: 515–523.
- 20. Bartali B, Benvenuti E, Corsi AM, Bandinelli S, Russo CR, et al. (2002) Changes in anthropometric measures in men and women across the life-span: findings from the InCHIANTI study. Sozial-Und Praventivmedizin 47: 336–348.
- 21. Evans WJ, Campbell WW (1993) Sarcopenia and age-related changes in body composition and functional capacity. J Nutr 123: 465–468.
- 22. Tanton LC, Cappaert TA, Gordon PM, Zoeller RF, Angelopoulos TJ, et al. (2009) Strength, Size, and Muscle Quality in the Upper Arm Following Unilateral Training in Younger and Older Males and Females. CMAMD 2: 9–18.
- 23. Magi R, Morris AP (2010) GWAMA: software for genome-wide association meta-analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 288.
- 24. Li Y, Ding J, Abecasis G (2006) Mach 1.0: rapid haplotype reconstruction and missing genotype inference. American Journal of Human Genetics 79: S2290.
- 25. Marchini J, Howie B, Myers S, McVean G, Donnelly P (2007) A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes. Nat Genet 39: 906–913.
- 26. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj 327: 557–560.
- 27. Higgins M, Province M, Heiss G, Eckfeldt J, Ellison RC, et al. (1996) NHLBI Family Heart Study: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol 143: 1219–1228.
- 28. Holmen J, Midthjell K, Krüger Ø, Langhammer A, Holmen TL, et al. (2003) The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 1995–97 (HUNT 2): Objectives, contents, methods and participation. Norsk Epidemiologi 13: 19–32.
- 29. Pietilainen KH, Soderlund S, Rissanen A, Nakanishi S, Jauhiainen M, et al. (2009) HDL subspecies in young adult twins: heritability and impact of overweight. Obesity (Silver Spring) 17: 1208–1214.
- 30. Kaprio J (2006) Twin studies in Finland 2006. Twin Res Hum Genet 9: 772–777.
- 31. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, et al. (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81: 559–575.
- 32. Gauderman WJ (2003) Candidate gene association analysis for a quantitative trait, using parent-offspring trios. Genet Epidemiol 25: 327–338.
- 33. Willer CJ, Speliotes EK, Loos RJ, Li S, Lindgren CM, et al. (2009) Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation. Nat Genet 41: 25–34.
- 34. Frayling TM, Timpson NJ, Weedon MN, Zeggini E, Freathy RM, et al. (2007) A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science 316: 889–894.
- 35. Fischer J, Koch L, Emmerling C, Vierkotten J, Peters T, et al. (2009) Inactivation of the Fto gene protects from obesity. Nature 458: 894–898.
- 36. Thorleifsson G, Walters GB, Gudbjartsson DF, Steinthorsdottir V, Sulem P, et al. (2009) Genome-wide association yields new sequence variants at seven loci that associate with measures of obesity. Nat Genet 41: 18–24.
- 37. Drieschner N, Belge G, Rippe V, Meiboom M, Loeschke S, et al. (2006) Evidence for a 3p25 breakpoint hot spot region in thyroid tumors of follicular origin. Thyroid 16: 1091–1096.
- 38. Stuebe AM, Lyon H, Herring AH, Ghosh J, Wise A, et al. (2010) Obesity and diabetes genetic variants associated with gestational weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203: 283 e281–217.