Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Conditional Ablation of Ezh2 in Murine Hearts Reveals Its Essential Roles in Endocardial Cushion Formation, Cardiomyocyte Proliferation and Survival

  • Li Chen,

    Affiliation Department of Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Yanlin Ma,

    Affiliation Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Eun Young Kim,

    Affiliations Department of Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Program in Genes and Development, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Wei Yu,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Robert J. Schwartz,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Ling Qian,

    Affiliation Department of Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Jun Wang

    Affiliation Department of Stem Cell Engineering, Basic Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America

Conditional Ablation of Ezh2 in Murine Hearts Reveals Its Essential Roles in Endocardial Cushion Formation, Cardiomyocyte Proliferation and Survival

  • Li Chen, 
  • Yanlin Ma, 
  • Eun Young Kim, 
  • Wei Yu, 
  • Robert J. Schwartz, 
  • Ling Qian, 
  • Jun Wang


Ezh2 is a histone trimethyltransferase that silences genes mainly via catalyzing trimethylation of histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27Me3). The role of Ezh2 as a regulator of gene silencing and cell proliferation in cancer development has been extensively investigated; however, its function in heart development during embryonic cardiogenesis has not been well studied. In the present study, we used a genetically modified mouse system in which Ezh2 was specifically ablated in the mouse heart. We identified a wide spectrum of cardiovascular malformations in the Ezh2 mutant mice, which collectively led to perinatal death. In the Ezh2 mutant heart, the endocardial cushions (ECs) were hypoplastic and the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process was impaired. The hearts of Ezh2 mutant mice also exhibited decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation and increased apoptosis. We further identified that the Hey2 gene, which is important for cardiomyocyte proliferation and cardiac morphogenesis, is a downstream target of Ezh2. The regulation of Hey2 expression by Ezh2 may be independent of Notch signaling activity. Our work defines an indispensible role of the chromatin remodeling factor Ezh2 in normal cardiovascular development.


The development of normal cardiac structure/function is essential for the survival of mammalian embryo. Cardiac development is a complex process that proceeds through cardiac remodeling, endocardial cushion (EC) development, and outflow tract formation. Disturbance of one or more of these processes may lead to cardiac structural malformations, i.e., congenital heart defects (CHDs), which are the most common of all human birth defects [1]. EC formation, which involves endocardial cell activation, endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and the proliferation, migration and subsequent invasion of mesenchymal cells into the acellular matrix (the cardiac jelly) to eventually form mature and functional ECs, is a critical process associated with atrioventricular septation and outflow tract formation. Although a number of transcription factors and signaling molecules were shown to be involved in normal heart development [2], [3], [4], the genetic network underlying development of CHDs, including deficiency in EC formation, remains an issue of intense interest.

Epigenetic systems that activate/silence gene expression are emerging as a key regulator in cell fate determination, stem cell pluripotency maintenance, and normal embryogenesis. The two fundamental epigenetic systems that have been extensively studied and have been shown to regulate gene activity are the chromatin remodeling Polycomb group (PcG) proteins including the polycomb repressive complex (PRC) 1 and 2, and the Trithorax-group (TrxG) complexes including the SWI/SNF complex. The PRC mainly catalyzes trimethylation of H3 lysine 27 (H3K27Me3) for gene silencing, whereas the TrxG complexes catalyzes trimethylation of H3 lysine 4 (H3K4Me3) for activation; both groups preferentially target the histone 3 on CpG islands that are present in the cis-regulatory region of a broad spectrum of genes [5], [6], [7]. PRC2 contains Ezh2, the only enzymatically active subunit in PRC2 that catalyzes H3K27Me3 via its SET domain, although to complete this enzymatic reaction requires physical interaction of Ezh2 with its partners [8], [9], [10]. The trimethylation of H3K27 provides a platform to recruit PRC1, facilitating silencing of the target genes. Thus, catalysis of H3K27Me3 by Ezh2 is a critical step that enables PcG proteins to accomplish their repressive function. In addition to its well-defined suppressive activity, Ezh2 may act as a co-activator. For instance, Ezh2 potentiated target gene activity via direct physical association with the estrogen receptor and β-catenin [11], and with RelA/RelB [12]. The positive impacts exerted by Ezh2 on these target genes were independent of its histone methyltransferase activity, i.e., SET domain. In addition, Ezh2-catalyzed H3K27Me3 has also been proposed to play a role in either activating or maintaining the active status of transcription of certain genes [13]. The above findings therefore suggest that Ezh2 exhibits dual functions of either activation or inhibition, which may be context-dependent.

The role of Ezh2 as a regulator of gene silencing, cell proliferation and embryonic stem cell identity has been previously studied [14], [15]. For instance, overexpression of Ezh2 specifically in the mammary epithelial cells promoted epithelial growth [16], whereas decrease of Ezh2 in a numerous cell lines resulted in defective cell division [17], [18]. Ezh2 was also shown to be involved in modulation of apoptosis. For example, Ezh2 suppressed E2F1-mediated apoptosis via epigenetically repressing expression of Bim, a pro-apoptotic factor that was a downstream target of E2F [19]. In addition, Ezh2 was required for normal murine embryogenesis, as demonstrated by early embryonic lethality of Ezh2−/− embryos [20]. Indeed, Ezh2 contributed to the development of a number of tissues/organs, such as the development of B cells, hair follicles, and limbs [21], [22], [23]. However, whether Ezh2 has crucial functions in cardiovascular development during embryogenesis has not been well investigated, although the detection of Ezh2 mRNA in the developing mouse embryonic heart at E9.5 [24] pointed to its potential role in cardiogenesis. This is in a sharp contrast to the well-defined roles of SWI/SNF complex components such as Baf60c and Brg1 in cardiac morphogenesis [25], [26].

In this study, we conditionally knocked out Ezh2 in murine hearts using mice with floxed Ezh2 alleles and Nkx2.5-cre, the latter which is a cardiac-specific cre expression line in which the cre recombinase expression is driven by the endogenous Nkx2.5 promoter [27]. This cre is active in the cardiac progenitor cells and throughout the full phase of heart development. We demonstrated that homozygous knockout of Ezh2 in mouse hearts led to lethal cardiovascular malformations with underdevelopment of the ECs. Ezh2 mutant hearts also exhibited decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation and increased apoptosis. We further showed that Hey2, a member of the hairy and enhancer of split related family, was a downstream target of Ezh2, and this regulation was independent of Notch signaling activity. These observations and associated mechanisms we describe here provided novel insights into the regulation of cardiac development by the epigenetic modifier Ezh2.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

The animals were handled in accordance with institutional guidelines with the approval (protocol ID 11006) of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Texas A&M University Health Science Center at Houston.

Generation of genetically modified mice

The generation and characterization of Ezh2 floxed (Ezh2fl/fl) mice, in which the SET domain that harbors enzymatic activity was flanked by loxP sites, were detailed previously [23]. Ezh2fl/fl mice were crossed with Nkx2.5-cre mice [27] to eventually produce conditional Ezh2 mutant Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ (Ezh2-cKO) mice. Timed matings between Ezh2fl/+:Nkx2.5-cre+ and Ezh2fl/fl mice were arranged as needed, and the day when a plug was seen was taken as E0.5. Embryos or embryonic hearts at various developmental stages such as E10.5, E12.5, E16.5, E18.5 or postnatal day (P) 1 were collected for RNA/protein analysis, or for histology. All animal procedures were performed in compliance with institutional guidelines and with approved protocol ID 11006 of the IACUC at the Texas A&M University Health Science Center at Houston.


Antibodies against trimethyl-histone 3-Lys27 (H3K27Me3), Tbx2 and Sox9 were purchased from Millipore. Antibodies against Ki67 and Snail were obtained from Abcam. Monoclonal anti-cardiac Troponin T (cTnT) antibody was from Lab Vision. Anti-phospho Histone 3-Ser10 (pH 3) was purchased from Upstate, monoclonal anti-alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) from Sigma, and anti-PECAM1 antibody from BD Biosciences. Antibodies against Ezh2, NFATc1, Histone H3 (H3) and GAPDH were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. The fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor® 488 (donkey anti-mouse) and 594 (goat anti-rabbit) were from Invitrogen.

Plasmid construction, cell culture, transient transfection and western blot

Mouse Ezh2 cDNA was PCR-amplified and inserted in frame after the HA tag of the PCGN vector via KpnI and BamHI sites (PCGN-Ezh2). The Notch reporter pJT123A, which contains 8× CBF binding sites [28], and the cDNA of the intracellular domain of Notch 2 (Notch2-ic) were gifts from Dr. Paul Ling (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA). The Notch2-ic cDNA was then subcloned into PCGN vector after the HA tag on KpnI and BamHI sites (PCGN-hNotch2-ic). The cDNA inserts of Ezh2 and hNotch2-ic were confirmed by sequencing. The Hey2 promoter luciferase reporter construct (Hey2-Luc), which contains a 1 kb fragment of the Hey2 promoter region, was a gift from Dr. Kimberly Foreman (Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, USA [29]). HeLa cells were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Transient transfections were performed using HeLa cells cultured in 24 well plates for using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Luciferase activity assays were then performed as detailed previously [30], [31]. Briefly, 100 ng of Hey2-Luc or pJT123A was co-transfected with the empty vector as a control or with various dosages of expression vectors, as indicated in the figure legend. The empty vector was used to maintain the balance of the total amount of plasmids used in the reporter assay. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h after transfection using Monolight™ 3010 (Pharmingen). Promoter activity was expressed as the ratio of luciferase activity obtained in the presence of specific factor(s) to that of the control group with the presence of only empty vector. Luciferase activity was expressed as mean ± SEM from at least two independent assays, with each carried out in duplicate.

Western blots (WB) were performed on lysates purified from E18.5 hearts. Protein extract (120 µg) from control and Ezh2-cKO hearts was subjected to electrophoresis using 4–12% NuPage SDS gel (Invitrogen) and then transferred to PVDF membrane and WB performed using the antibodies indicated in the figure legend, and visualized with chemiluminescence.

Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and microarray assays

RNAs were extracted from wild type (WT) embryonic hearts at indicated developmental stages, or from E16.5 control (Ezh2fl/fl) and Ezh2-cKO hearts, using Trizol according to the manufacturer's protocol. Microarray service was provided by Phalanx Biotech (OneArray Express) with three samples per group, and each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Reverse transcription reaction was carried out using 1 µg total RNA, cloned reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and Oligo dT, which generated a final 50 µl volume reaction to generate the complementary DNA (cDNA). The cDNA (1 µl for Ezh2 and 0.5 µl for GAPDH, respectively) was subsequently used in semi-quantitative PCR with two alternative PCR cycles (30 or 35). qPCR was performed on machine 7900HT (Applied Biosystems) using SYBR®-Green and the gene-specific probes. The sequences of oligos used in this study are shown below: Ezh2: forward, 5′ ACTTACTGCTGGCACCGTCT 3′, reverse, 5′ TGCATCCACCACAAAATCAT 3′; Ezh1: forward, 5′ TGGTGTCTTGCAAAAACTGC 3′, reverse, 5′ AGGTTGAAGAGGAAGCTGGA 3′; Hey2: forward, 5′ AAGCGCCCTTGTGAGGAAAC 3′, reverse, 5′ CCCTCTCCTTTTCTTTCTTGC 3′; GAPDH: forward, 5′ ATGTTCCAGTATGACTCCACTCAC 3′, reverse, 5′ GAAGACACCAGTAGACTCCACGA 3′.

Histology, alcian blue staining and immunofluorescence staining

For histological analysis, embryos or heart tissues were fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at the stages indicated in each figure legend, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin for preparation of histological sections at 5 or 10 µm thickness. The slides were rehydrated, followed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining according to the manufacturer's instructions. Alcian blue staining was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The procedure of immunofluorescence staining was described previously [32]. Briefly, for antigen retrieval, the sections were boiled in sodium citrate buffer (10 mM, pH = 6.0), and subsequently blocked in 2% normal goat serum/PBST (1× PBS/0.05% Tween20), incubated with the primary antibody of interest at appropriate concentration, followed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies in blocking solution. TUNEL staining was conducted with ApopTag® Red In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Millipore). Sections were mounted with Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratory) and photographed under an Olympus fluorescence microscope. The number of phospho Histone H3 (pH 3) positive, Ki67 positive or TUNEL positive cells (pH 3+, Ki67+ or TUNEL+) was scored in at least three randomly selected fields in the left ventricle or atrioventricular cushion of E12.5 or in the atrioventricular septum of E16.5 hearts, and expressed as mean ± SEM. The number of double Tbx2 and alpha-SMA positive cells (Tbx2+:alpha-SMA+) was scored in at least three randomly selected fields in the atrioventricular cushion region of E12.5 hearts. The number of Sox9 positive cells (Sox9+), or Snai1 positive cells (Snai1+) was scored in the atrioventricular cushion region of E12.5 hearts. The data were expressed as mean ± SEM.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP)

ChIP assay was performed using the EZ-ChIP™ chromatin immunoprecipitation kit (Millipore, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions, with slight modification. Briefly, homogenized heart tissues were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, harvested, and rinsed with 1× PBS. Cell nuclei were then isolated, pelleted, and sonicated. DNA fragments were subsequently enriched by immunoprecipitation with anti-Ezh2 antibody or with IgG as a control. The precipitated genomic DNA was washed, eluted from the antibody or IgG, and crosslinks were reversed by heating at 65°C. Thereafter, the DNA was recovered by phenol/chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation and washing. The purified DNA pellet was resuspended in 1×TE buffer for subsequent PCR assay using the following primers targeting the first half of CpG island upstream of the transcriptional initiation site (TIS) of the Hey2 gene: forward, 5′ CACGCGCTAGCGGTTATTCT 3′; reverse, 5′ CACGCTGCAGCCCAGCCAG 3′.

Statistical analysis

The unpaired Student's t test or Chi-square test was applied to determine statistical significance between groups when applicable and the respective p-value is shown in each figure legend. p<0.05 was defined as significant and p<0.01 as highly significant.


Conditional deletion of Ezh2 in murine hearts led to CHDs

To explore the function of Ezh2 in cardiogenesis, we first asked if Ezh2 was expressed in the developing mouse heart. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR with two different PCR cycle numbers (30 and 35) was performed on RNA samples purified from E9.5, E10.5 and E11.5 WT embryonic hearts using a pair of oligos against the SET domain of Ezh2 (Fig. 1A, upper panel). Ezh2 mRNA was detected as early as E9.5 (Fig. 1B), consistent with the previous report [24]. Next, Ezh2fl/fl mice were crossed with Ezh2fl/+:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice to generate cardiac-specific Ezh2 knockout (Ezh2-cKO) mice. To assess the deletion efficiency of Ezh2 in heart, qRT-PCR was performed on cDNAs obtained from RNAs of E16.5 Ezh2fl/fl (control) and mutant Ezh2-cKO hearts using the primers mentioned above. A pair of oligos against the SET domain of Ezh1 (Fig. 1A, lower panel), the other Ezh family member, was used as a control. The mRNA expression of Ezh2 in the Ezh2 null hearts was decreased by ∼70% relative to the control, and as expected, the expression of Ezh1 was not affected (Fig. 1C). Correspondingly, Western blot analysis of E18.5 heart lysates prepared from control and Ezh2 mutant mice showed a significant reduction in H3K27Me3 in Ezh2-cKO heart (Fig. 1D, upper panel), even in the presence of a slightly increased level of the total Histone H3 (Fig. 1D, middle panel), while no significant difference in the GAPDH level between these two groups was observed. These results indicate reduced Ezh2 function in the Ezh2 mutant heart.

Figure 1. Conditional knockout of Ezh2 gene in murine hearts caused perinatal lethality.

(A) Schematic illustration showing the annealing sites of primer pairs of mouse Ezh2 and Ezh1 (a homolog of Ezh2). (B) Ezh2 expression in the murine embryonic hearts. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR with two different numbers of amplification cycles (30 and 35) was performed on RNA samples purified from WT hearts of E9.5, E10.5, and E11.5. 1 µl or 0.5 µl cDNA from reverse transcription reaction was used for detection of Ezh2 or GAPDH (as a control), respectively. (C) qRT-PCR analysis revealed ∼70% decrease in Ezh2 mRNA of Ezh2-cKO heart (n = 3, p<0.001), but Ezh1 mRNA was not affected, compared with that of the control littermate hearts. Data are presented as mean ± SD of 3 replicate samples for each strain/gene analyzed. (D) The level of H3K27Me3 was reduced in the E18.5 Ezh2-cKO hearts, compared to that of control. The total Histone H3 and GAPDH both serve as controls. The asterisks indicate H3K27Me3. NS, non-specific. (E) The neonatal mortality rate (%) and (F) the P1 frequency of four different genotypes resulting from the crossbreeding between Ezh2fl/+:Nkx2.5-cre+ and Ezh2fl/fl mice. Data in panel E & F represent the average of 12 litters comprising a total of 99 animals. (G) The number and recovery rate (in parenthesis) of Ezh2fl/+, Ezh2fl/+:Nkx2.5-cre+, Ezh2fl/fl, and Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ embryos collected at various embryonic stages are shown. Offspring from intercrossing between genotypes of Ezh2fl/fl and Ezh2fl/+:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice. Note that the expected Mendelian rate of embryo recovery for each of these four genotypes is 25%. (H) Embryonic demise of Ezh2 mutant mice at a later gestational stage. The representative images of E16.5 WT and dead Ezh2 mutant embryos are shown.

While Ezh2fl/+:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice appeared normal, viable and fertile, all Ezh2fl/fl: Nkx2.5-cre+ newborn pups died before P3 (mortality rate 100%, compared with 12.50% of Ezh2fl/+, 6.90% of Ezh2fl/+:Nkx2.5-cre+, and 10% of Ezh2fl/fl, respectively, Fig. 1E), with a slight deviation of P1 frequency (20.20%) from the expected Mendelian rate of 25% (Fig. 1F). Timed matings recovered mutant embryos at a low frequency (16%) at embryonic stages between E16.5 and E17.5 (Fig. 1G), indicating embryonic loss at later gestational stages. As shown in Fig. 1H, we indeed found dead Ezh2-cKO embryos at E16.5. To understand the cause of death of Ezh2 mutant mice, histological examination was performed on control (n = 11) and mutant (n = 10) hearts, and revealed 100% penetrance of cardiac defects for mutant mice, and only ∼9.1% for control (Fig. 2K, p<0.0001). A variety of cardiovascular structural malformations was observed in the mutant mice, including double outlet right ventricle (DORV, 30%, Fig. 2E), in which the aorta was connected to the right ventricle instead of the left ventricle; persistent truncus arteriosus (PTA, 20%, Fig. 2, see the transition of PTA from F to G), in which a defective septation between the pulmonary trunk and the aorta allowed a communication between these two great vessels; membranous ventricular septal defects (VSDs, 60%, Fig. 2E, F, G & J); muscular VSDs (80%, Fig. 2H); atrial septal defects (ASDs, 60%, Fig. 2I); atrioventricular canal defects (AVCD, 20%, Fig. 2J). In addition, 3 out of 10 mutant mice examined exhibited enlarged aortic valves (Fig. 2, compare F′ or G′ with B′). There was no discernible structural phenotype(s) in the ventral pharyngeal endoderm of Ezh2 mutant hearts at E10.5 (data not shown), where Nkx2.5-cre is also active. Collectively, these findings suggest an indispensable role of Ezh2 in normal cardiovascular morphogenesis.

Figure 2. Characterization of cardiac phenotypes in Ezh2-cKO mice.

(A–D) H&E staining of the coronal sections of the control mouse hearts at P1 showed normal structure of heart and great vessels. (E–J) H&E staining of the coronal sections of the Ezh2-cKO (Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+) hearts at P1 showed a variety of cardiovascular defects: E, double outlet right ventricle (DORV) and perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD, arrow); F & G, two serial sections showing the transition of persistent truncus arteriosus (PTA). F′ and G′ are the amplification of the boxed region in F and G, respectively. Arrows in G and G′ indicate the septal opening; H, muscular VSD (arrow); I, atrial septal defect (ASD, arrow); J, atrioventricular canal defects (AVCD, upper arrow) and membranous VSD (lower arrow). (K) The penetrance of cardiac defects in the mutant hearts was 100%, with variable incidence of different CHDs, as indicated. RV: right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; LA, left atrium; Ao, Aorta; PT, pulmonary trunk. n = 10. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Impaired endocardial cushion development in Ezh2 mutant hearts

Normal development of the ECs is essential for the formation of outflow tract and proper septation of atria and ventricles. The presence of DORV, perimembranous VSD and AVCD in Ezh2 mutant mice prompted us to ask whether Ezh2 regulated EC development. Since EC region in the AV canal started to develop at ∼E9.5, we first performed H&E staining on E10.5 heart sections prepared from control and Ezh2 mutant embryos (n = 3/group) to investigate EC formation. Although the morphology of ECs in the mutant heart appeared indistinguishable from that in the control heart at this stage, it displayed substantially fewer cells in the cardiac cushions (Fig. 3A & B, arrows), indicating impaired EC development. The reduction in cell population in the EC region could be attributed to either decreased cell proliferation, or increased cell apoptosis, or both. To investigate which mechanism(s) underlied defective EC development, staining of Ki67, a cell proliferation marker, was first performed on E10.5 heart sections of both control and mutants. A considerable reduction in the cell proliferation in the EC region of Ezh2 mutant hearts (∼40/field) compared with control hearts (∼68/field, p<0.05) was observed (Fig. 3C,D′ & G). At E10.5, the trabeculae of the Ezh2 mutant hearts were not well formed (Fig. 3A′ & B′, arrowheads). The compact zone of mutant hearts was not significantly thinner compared with that of WT hearts at this stage; however, a significant decrease in cardiomyocyte proliferation in the compact zone of mutant hearts was already seen (Fig. 3C″ & D″, and see below). TUNEL staining performed on the same heart samples mentioned above revealed a significant elevation in apoptosis in the mutant hearts (Fig. 3E–F′ & H, n = 3/group, p<0.05). Thus, deletion of Ezh2 was responsible for both decreased cell division and increased apoptosis in the EC region, consequently leading to hypoplastic ECs.

Figure 3. Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice exhibited hypoplastic endocardial cushions.

(A–B′) H&E staining revealed a decrease in the cell population in the EC region of Ezh2 null hearts compared with that of control (arrows) at E10.5. Also, Ezh2 mutant heart displayed defective trabeculation (arrowheads). A′ and B′ are the amplification of the boxed region of A and B, respectively. A & B, 20× magnification; A′ & B′, 40× magnification. (C–D″ & G) Double-immunofluorescence with anti-Ki67 antibody (red) and anti-cardiac Troponin T antibody (cTnT, green) revealed a reduced number of Ki67+ cells in both the compact myocardium and the AV cushion of Ezh2-cKO hearts at E10.5, compared with that of littermate controls. C′ and D′ are the amplification of the bigger boxed region of C and D; C″ and D″ are the amplification of the smaller boxed region of C and D. C & D, 20× magnification; C′–D″, 40× magnification. Scale bar, 100 µm. G shows that the number of Ki67+ cells was significantly decreased in Ezh2-cKO hearts relative to the control. The number of Ki67+ cells was counted from 10 randomly selected fields in the ECs. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p<0.05. n = 3 per group. (E–F′ & H) Double immunofluorescence of TUNEL staining (red) and anti-cTnT (green) revealed an increased number of TUNEL+ cells in both the AV cushion of Ezh2-cKO hearts at E10.5, compared with that of littermate controls. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI, as shown in blue. E′ and F′ are the amplification of the boxed region of E and F respectively. E & F, 20× magnification; E′& F′, 40× magnification. Scale bar: 100 µm. H shows that the number of TUNEL+ cells was significantly increased in Ezh2-cKO hearts relative to the control. The number of TUNEL+ cells was counted from 10 randomly selected fields. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p<0.05. n = 3 per group. OFT, outflow tract; A, common atrium; V, common ventricle.

Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was impaired in Ezh2 mutant hearts

Endocardial cushions (ECs) are believed to originate from two major cell types: cardiac neural crest cells, which participate in the formation of the distal part of cardiac outflow tract, and endothelial cells, which undergo EMT and comprise ECs in the AV canal. EMT is a critical process in the EC development, and defective EMT can lead to a number of cardiac malformations such as AVCD, DORV and membranous VSD, as observed in the Ezh2 mutant mice. To explore whether EMT was negatively affected in the Ezh2 mutant hearts, we stained tissues for the endothelial cell marker PECAM1 and transformed mesenchymal cell marker α-SMA to detect endothelial cells or transformed mesenchymal cells in the AV canal. At E10.5, PECAM1+ endothelial cells lined the ECs as previously observed [33], and no significant change in the PECAM1+ cells between control and Ezh2 mutant hearts was observed (Fig. 4A & B). At this stage, α-SMA+ cells were barely detected in either group. At E12.5, the pattern of PECAM1 staining in the EC region was similar to that at E10.5, but the α-SMA+ cells could be detected in both groups. However, the number of α-SMA+ cells—cushion mesenchymal cells undergoing SM differentiation—in the Ezh2 mutant hearts was substantially lower than that in the control hearts (Fig. 4C, D, E, F, arrows), indicating defects in mesenchymal cell differentiation. To further examine the defect of EMT in the Ezh2 mutant heart, we stained for Sox9 and Snai1, both of which are transcription factors important for the EMT process [33], [34]. The number of either the Sox9+ (Fig. 4G, H′ & K) or the Snai1+ cells (Fig. 4I,J′ & L) in the ECs of Ezh2 mutant hearts was significantly reduced by ∼30% compared with those in littermate control hearts (p<0.05, n = 3/group), further supporting that EMT was impaired.

Figure 4. Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice exhibited impaired endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in the AV cushion.

(A–F) Double-immunofluorescence staining of the sagittal sections of E10.5–12.5 embryos with anti-PECAM1 antibody (red) and anti-α-SMA (green) revealed a reduced number of α-SMA+ cushion mesenchymal cells (arrows) in Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ hearts compared with that of control hearts. At E10.5 and E12.5, PECAM1+ cells were detected lining the AV cushion, and no difference of PECAM1+ cells was observed between Ezh2 mutant and control (A–D′). α-SMA+ cells were barely visible in the EC region at E10.5 in both control and mutant hearts (A & B), but were detected at E12.5 (C & D′, boxed areas). However, the number of α-SMA+ cells in the control EC region was significantly higher than that in the Ezh2 mutant heart (C′ & D′, arrows). C′ and D′ are the amplification of the boxed area of C and D, respectively. Note that the cluster of α-SMA+ cells observed in D′ was the migrating myocardium; only the isolated independent α-SMA+ cells (arrows) were EMT cells. Two additional independent sections also showed more α-SMA+ cells in control (E, arrows) than in Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ (F). A–D, 20× magnification; C′, D′, E, F, 40× magnification. Scale bar: 100 µm. (G–L) Double immunofluorescence staining of the sagittal sections of E12.5 embryos with anti-Sox9 antibody (red, G–H′) or anti-Snai1 antibody (red, I–J′) and anti-alpha-SMA (green) revealed reduced number of Sox9+ and Snail+ cells in the atrioventricular endocardial cushion of Ezh2-cKO hearts compared with that in the littermate control hearts (n = 3). K and L show the statistical analysis of the number of Sox9+ and Snail+ cells, respectively, in the atrioventricular endocardial cushion per histological section between these two groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 3 for each group. *, p<0.05. Magnification, 20× for G, H, I and J, and 40× for G′, H′, I′ and J′. Scale bar: 100 µm. (M–N) Alcian blue staining in the EC extracellular matrix of E10.5 hearts showed no significant difference in morphology between Ezh2 mutant and control hearts (n = 3/group). Magnification, 10×. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Normal EC development requires invasion of endocardial-derived mesenchymal cells into the cardiac jelly within the AV canal, and impairments in formation of the cardiac jelly could also lead to deficient EMT. To address this issue, alcian blue staining, which can visualize acid glycosaminoglycans, such as hyaluronic acid within and surrounding the ECs, was performed on sections of embryonic hearts prepared from E10.5 Ezh2fl/fl and Ezh2-cKO embryos. Both control and Ezh2 mutant hearts exhibited comparable pattern of staining (Fig. 4M & N). Thus, the cardiac jelly formation did not account for the deficient EMT seen in the Ezh2 mutant hearts.

Tbx2 was downregulated in the AV myocardium of Ezh2 mutant hearts

Since the cardiac phenotypes observed in the Ezh2-cKO mutant mice such as defective EC formation and OFT septation were similar to those observed in mice homozygous for Tbx2 and NFACTc1, both of which were shown to be important for specification and differentiation of endocardial cushion [35], [36], [37], we first examined the expression of NFATc1 in the AV canal in both control and Ezh2-cKO hearts at E10.5. The staining of NFATc1 showed no significant difference between these two groups (Fig. 5A & B). We next examined Tbx2 expression in these hearts at two developmental stages, E10.5 and E12.5, respectively. The expression of Tbx2, which was mainly localized in the AV myocardium of the EC region, was significantly decreased by ∼50% in the Ezh2 mutant hearts compared with that in the control hearts at both embryonic stages examined (Fig. 5 C, D, E, F, G, arrows. n = 3/group, p<0.05). Thus, the reduction in Tbx2 expression in the Ezh2-cKO heart could be a contributing factor in the development of deficient ECs, and subsequently, of cardiovascular malformation.

Figure 5. Decreased Tbx2 expression in the AV myocardium of Ezh2 mutant mice.

(A–B) Double immunofluorescence staining of the sagittal sections of E10.5 embryos with anti-NFATc1 antibody (red) and anti-alpha-SMA (green) revealed no change in the number of NFATc1+ endothelial cells in Ezh2-cKO hearts compared with that in littermate control hearts. (C–F) Double-immunofluorescence staining of the sagittal sections of E10.5–12.5 embryos with anti-Tbx2 antibody (red) and anti-alpha-SMA (green) revealed greatly reduced Tbx2+:α-SMA+ (arrows) primary myocardial cells of the atrioventricular canal in Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ hearts, compared with that of the littermate control hearts. Dotted lines outlined the valve primordia. The number of Tbx2+:α-SMA+ cells was counted in three randomly selected fields of Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ and control hearts of E10.5 or E12.5 embryos. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI, as shown in blue. G shows the statistical analysis of Tbx2+:α-SMA+ cells between these two groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 3 for each group. *, p<0.05. Magnification, 20×. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation and increased apoptosis in the compact and trabecular myocardium of Ezh2 null hearts

Given the observed decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation in the compact zone of Ezh2-cKO hearts at E10.5 (Fig. 3C″&D″), we further characterized the molecular phenotypes in the myocardium of Ezh2 mutant hearts compared with that of littermate controls at a later stage, E16.5. In the mutant hearts, the trabeculae were not well defined (Fig. 6A & B, arrows), and the compact zone of the ventricular wall was thinner (Fig. 6A & B, bars), indicating defective myocardial maturation. Next, cardiomyocyte proliferation was examined by pH 3 staining. The number of cardiomyocytes entering the mitotic phase was significantly higher in control hearts (Fig. 6C & D, ∼16/field, n = 3) than in Ezh2 mutant hearts (∼5/field, n = 3, p<0.05, Fig. 6I). Consistent with this observation, the number of total dividing cardiomyocytes was reduced in mutant hearts (Fig. 6E & F, arrows, ∼62/field, n = 3) compared with that in control hearts (∼98/field, n = 3, p<0.05, Fig. 6J). These observations further indicated that Ezh2 is an important regulator of cardiomyocyte division, in line with the reports of involvement of Ezh2 in regulating the cell cycle in other tissues/cell lines [13], [17]. We also examined apoptosis in Ezh2 mutant and control hearts at this stage using TUNEL assay, and observed a significant difference in the number of apoptotic cardiomyocytes between these two groups (Fig. 6G, H & K, arrows; mutant ∼2.5/field vs. control 0.5/field, n = 3/group, p<0.05). Taken together, these findings demonstrate Ezh2's essential role in cardiomyocyte proliferation and survival.

Figure 6. Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice exhibited defective formation of myocardial compact zone and trabeculation.

(A–D & I) Double immunofluorescence staining of the coronal sections of E16.5 hearts with anti-pH 3 antibody (red) and anti-cTnT antibody (green) revealed a reduced number of double pH 3+:cTnT+ cells (arrows) in Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ embryos. (A & B) The left ventricular free wall (bar) was thinner and trabeculation (arrows) was not well formed in E16.5 Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ hearts, compared with that of the littermate controls. C & D show A & B (20×) at a higher magnification (40×). I, the number of double pH 3+:cTnT+ cells was counted from at least three randomly selected fields of each sample and was significantly reduced in E16.5 Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ hearts. n = 3/group. *, p<0.05. (E, F & J) Double-immunofluorescence staining of the coronal sections of E16.5 hearts with anti-Ki67 antibody (red) and anti-cTnT antibody (green) revealed a reduced number of double Ki67+:cTnT+ cells (arrows) in Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ hearts relative to the littermate controls. Magnification, 20×. J, the number of Ki67+: cTnT+ cells were counted from at least three randomly selected fields of each sample and was significantly reduced in E16.5 Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ hearts. n = 3/group. *, p<0.05. (G, H & K) Double-immunofluorescence analysis of TUNEL (red) and anti-cTnT antibody (green) stained coronal sections of E16.5 hearts revealed an increase in the number of double TUNEL+:cTnT+ cells (arrows) in Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ hearts. Magnification, 20×. K, the number of TUNEL+:cTnT+ cells were counted from at least three randomly selected fields and showed significantly increased in E16.5 Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ hearts. n = 3/group. *, p<0.05). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI and shown in blue. All data were presented as means ± SD. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Ezh2 regulated the expression of Hey2 gene

To further identify potential Ezh2-dependent genetic pathways that regulate cardiac development, we generated gene profiling data from E16.5 RNA from control and Ezh2-cKO heart s (n = 3/group) to look for up- or down-regulation of candidate factors critical for cardiac morphogenesis, including the EC development. In the Ezh2 mutant hearts, there was no significant decrease in the transcription level of a number of factors that have been shown to be critical for heart development, i.e., as Foxp1, Tgfb2, BMP2/BMP4, Tbx1, Tbx5, Foxm1, GATA4, 5, 6 (Table 1). However, Hey2, a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)-containing transcription factor that is required for AV canal development [38], was significantly decreased by ∼40% (p = 0.022, data not shown); the decrease in expression of Hey2 in the Ezh2 mutant hearts was further confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 7A, n = 3/group, p = 0.006). The Hey2 mRNA level was also significantly reduced in the Ezh2−/− embryoid bodies (data not shown). The Ezh2-mediated Hey2 expression appeared to be specific because Hey1 and Heyl, the other two members of Hey family, and all other hes transcripts were expressed normally (Table 1). Hey2 and other Hey family members were identified as Notch signaling targets [39], [40], [41]; however, in the Ezh2 mutant hearts, the major components of Notch signaling pathway displayed no significant decrease in the transcription level (Table 1). Instead, Notch4 was even significantly upregulated (Table 1). These data suggest Notch pathway-independent regulation of Hey2 by Ezh2.

Figure 7. Ezh2 regulated Hey2 expression.

(A) RT-qPCR confirmed downregulation of Hey2 expression in the Ezh2 mutant hearts. n = 3 per group. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. (B) Ezh2 directly bound to the CpG island upstream of the Hey2 gene. Upper panel: A putative CpG island was located in its 5′ cis-regulatory region (as indicated by the smaller square), spanning exon 1 of Hey2 gene. Arrows indicate the locations of oligos for ChIP assay. Lower panel: PCR on ChIP DNA showed direct binding of Ezh2 to the CpG island. Pulldown with IgG served as a control. (C) Ezh2 potentiated Hey2 promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner. (D) Functional interaction between Ezh2 and Notch in the activation of target promoters. Transfection was performed using HeLa cells as described in Materials and Methods. The doses of plasmids used in the transactivation assays are indicated. The data shown were obtained from at least two independent assays with each carried out in duplicate. The group with Ezh2 “0” and Notch2-ic “0” in D is the control. The number shown above each bar indicates the fold change of that particular group.

Table 1. No significant decrease in the expression of Notch signaling molecules and major factors that are important for cardiac development between control and Ezh2 mutant hearts.

To probe if Ezh2 could directly regulate Hey2 expression, we revealed the presence of a CpG island in the 5′ flanking sequence of Hey2 gene using a bioinformatics tool (EMBL-EBI). This CpG island is 932 bp, and spans exon 1 of the Hey2 gene (Fig. 7B, upper panel, smaller box), thus rendering Hey2 as a potential target for Ezh2. To investigate if Ezh2 could directly bind to this CpG island, ChIP assays were performed on WT hearts using anti-Ezh2 antibody, or as a control, IgG for pulldown; PCR was then performed using the precipitated genomic DNA (gDNA) in combination with primers designed to bind in the region flanking the first half of the CpG island, which is immediately upstream of the TIS of Hey2 gene (Fig. 7B, upper panel, arrows). Robust binding of Ezh2 on the targeted region of CpG island was observed, but not for the control (IgG-precipitated) gDNA (Fig. 7B, lower panel). To explore if Ezh2 had any impact on the activity of the Hey2 promoter, transactivation assays were carried out on HeLa cells transfected with the Hey2-Luc reporter construct, which harbors the first 455 bp of the CpG island, along with either an empty vector or increasing dosages of Ezh2. As shown in Fig. 7C, Ezh2 potentiated Hey2-Luc activity up to ∼28 fold in a dose-dependent fashion.

The Notch pathway is also known to positively regulate Hey2 expression. To elucidate if there was any functional interaction between Ezh2 and Notch signaling, various dosages of the vector encoding the active domain of Notch2 (Notch2-ic) was transfected into HeLa cells with or without Ezh2. Notch2-ic activated Hey2 promoter to a much less degree (up to ∼3 fold, Fig. 7D, upper panel) than Ezh2, and a slight synergy between Notch2-ic and Ezh2 was observed. We also tested the potential crosstalk between Ezh2 and Notch using the Notch reporter pJT123A, which contains only CBF binding sites. As expected, Notch2-ic substantially increased the activity of the Notch reporter up to ∼158 fold (Fig. 7D, lower panel), and Ezh2, at the tested dosage (0.5 µg), also activated this Notch reporter to a comparable level as Hey2-Luc. Unexpectedly, Ezh2 and Notch2-ic exerted a substantial synergistic effect on the pJT123A reporter (up to ∼229 fold at the two lowest doses of Ezh2 and Notch2-ic tested). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that there is a functional interaction between Ezh2 and the Notch pathway, particularly on the tested Notch reporter.


As a chromatin remodeling enzyme, Ezh2 is involved in a variety of cellular events and in development of certain tissues/organs and functions by regulating target gene expression. Here we reported a particular contribution of Ezh2 to normal cardiovascular development using the approach of cardiac-specific cre-mediated ablation of Ezh2 in murine hearts.

Our data revealed that Ezh2 is critical for the atrial and ventricular septation process and for normal formation of OFT, as demonstrated by a wide spectrum of cardiovascular anomalies observed in the Ezh2 deficient hearts. The existence of structural malformations such as AVCD, and perimembranous VSD in the Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice suggested defects in the EC formation, while the muscular VSD possibly resulted from decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation and/or increased apoptosis. Indeed, Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice exhibited hypoplastic ECs with normal development of extracellular matrix. The decrease in Sox9+ and Snai1+ cells, combined with the reduction of SMA+ cells in the EC region of Ezh2 mutant hearts, suggested that the transition from the endothelial phenotype to mesenchymal phenotype was not completed in the absence of Ezh2, and/or that the initiation of EMT was impaired in the presence of the decreased Snai1expression, given the critical role Snai1 plays in activating EMT [33]. However, the deficient EC development of Ezh2 null hearts should be a consequence of the combined effects of decreased cell proliferation, increased apoptosis and impaired EMT, although the individual role that each of these three aspects plays in the defective EC formation remains to be dissected. It has to be pointed out that the Ezh2 deficiency-associated cell proliferation defect and increased apoptosis observed in the EC region was not specific for ECs. Instead, it was a part of a global effect; similar alterations were also present in the other regions of the mutant hearts, such as in the ventricular walls and septum. Therefore, Ezh2 regulates cardiomyocyte proliferation and survival in different regions of the developing heart and at different stages of its development.

Although we did not investigate particularly whether the OFT cushion that derived from cardiac neural crest cells was affected in the Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ mutant, the presence of DORV, PTA and defective semilunar valve leaflets of OFT indicated defective cardiac neural crest-derived mesenchyme, although these anomalies were not as prevalent as the other cardiac phenotypes. Our results were in line with the observation that Nkx2.5+ cardiac progenitors contributed to the formation of both the AV and OFT cushions [42]. Indeed, using Nkx2.5-cre to delete BMP4 also caused defective OFT septation with impaired neural crest-derived smooth muscle [43]. Our observations pointed to the possibility that Ezh2 was present in the cardiac neural crest cells and was required for outflow tract formation. To fully understand the function of Ezh2 in the cardiac neural crest formation, specification and/or migration, alternative strategies such as the Wnt1-cre system, in which Cre recombinase expression is driven by the Wnt1 promoter and enhancer and has often been used to conditionally delete target gene(s) in the neural crest lineage [44], [45], should be employed.

We further examined two factors that are involved in the AV canal development and outflow tract formation, Tbx2 and NFATc1, by immunostaining. We showed no significant change in NFATc1, a factor which is critical in promoting the loss of endothelial phenotype, but Tbx2 was significantly downregulated in the AV canal myocardium of the Ezh2-cKO. Given that the Tbx2 knockout embryos exhibited AV canal defects and outflow tract misalignment [35], the reduction in Tbx2 expression in the AV myocardium of Ezh2 null mice could be a factor that facilitated development of the cardiac anomalies observed in Ezh2-cKO mice. Intriguingly, a significant reduction in Tbx2 expression was only observed in the AV canal myocardium, but not in the other areas such as the ventricular wall and septum (data not shown). How Ezh2 regulates Tbx2 expression specifically in the myocardium of AV canal remains open for further investigation.

Notch signaling is important for normal cardiac development, as evidenced by a number of studies in which mutation of Notch signaling component(s) caused cardiac defects [46]. Activation of Notch signaling elements such as Notch 4 promoted EMT [47]. In our study, we noticed a significant upregulation of Notch4 transcription in the Ezh2 mutant hearts relative to the WT controls. Despite this increase, however, EMT in the Ezh2-cKO hearts was not enhanced but instead was underdeveloped; this effect was opposite to the consequence of elevated Notch 4 activity. Also, a number of proposed downstream targets in the Notch signaling pathway that we examined were not significantly increased either in the Ezh2 mutant hearts. These findings collectively suggested that 1) the increase of Notch 4 was not sufficient to significantly increase the expression of Notch target genes in the absence of Ezh2, and 2) the heart defects observed in the mutant Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice was not due to the increased Notch signaling activity.

In the current study we identified Hey2 as a downstream target of Ezh2. Hey2 was highly expressed in the embryonic cardiovascular system [48], and correspondingly, knockout of Hey2 in mice caused cardiovascular anomalies (variable phenotypes, depending upon the strain) and perinatal death; [49], [50], [51]. Hey2 was also involved in regulating apoptosis [52]. The observations associated with Hey2 knockout included thinner ventricular wall, defects of cardiac septation and outflow tract formation, accompanied with decreased proliferation, which were similar to the defects observed in the Ezh2 deficient murine hearts. Hey2 was proposed to have an important role in the formation of ECs [51]; however, its specific function in the EC development, i.e., EMT, cell proliferation or survival of EC region, remains to be determined. The significant decrease in the expression level of Hey2 gene in the Ezh2 mutant heart could be an important factor that contributed to the development of cardiovascular malformations.

Although Hey2 was first identified together with other hairy-related bHLH transcription factors as direct targets of the Notch signaling pathway [41], a number of recent studies suggested that Notch signaling was dispensable for the regulation of Hey2 expression in certain tissues/organs such as chick heart and the caudal presomitic mesoderm [53], [54]. A FGF signaling molecule, FGF17, also regulated Hey2 gene expression in the pillar cells of the organ of Corti independent of Notch signaling [55]. In the Notch1 null ventricular myocardium, the Hey2 level was also not significantly affected [56]. Our finding of downregulation of Hey2 expression in the Ezh2-deficient hearts suggested that Hey2 was a downstream target of Ezh2 and that this regulation was independent of both Notch signaling activity and FGF17 because no significant decrease in the transcripts of Notch signaling components or FGF17 was observed in the Ezh2 null embryonic hearts. The direct binding of Ezh2 to the CpG island located in the cis-regulatory sequence of the Hey2 gene and activation of the Hey2 promoter by Ezh2 raised the likelihood that Ezh2 directly regulates Hey2 expression. Our observation that Ezh2 regulated Hey2 gene expression adds another layer of complexity to our understanding of this pathway, at least in the developing heart. Of particular interest in the future is to probe whether Hey2 and Ezh2 can cooperatively govern cardiovascular developmental program in vivo.

Our work further revealed that the crosstalk between Ezh2 and the Notch pathway existed, at least on the promoters we tested. Different levels of synergy between Ezh2 and Notch were observed using different target promoters, indicating that the degree of crosstalk between them may be context dependent. It appears that Ezh2 may indirectly activate the target promoter via the Notch-dependent pathway, because together with Notch2-ic, Ezh2 elevated a Notch reporter that presumably does not have any potential Ezh2 binding element(s). However, in Ezh2 null mice, there was no significant change in the transcription level of most Notch downstream targets; thus, the in vivo relevance of the functional interaction between Ezh2 and Notch signaling observed in the promoter assays remains to be clarified. It will be interesting to explore whether Ezh1could compensate for the loss of Ezh2, and thereby, cooperate with Notch to maintain the normal expression of the Notch signaling target genes. However, it is unlikely that Ezh1 could replace the function of Ezh2 in normal cardiac morphogenesis (see below).

Our microarray data showed that knockout of Ezh2 in heart upregulated more genes (>600) than it downregulated (<200) (Table S1 & S2, and data not shown), which is consistent with the current belief that Ezh2 functions primarily as a repressor of target gene expression. The major function of Ezh2 is to trimethylate H3K27. As expected, deletion of the floxed SET domain of Ezh2 using Nkx2.5-cre resulted in a substantial decrease in H3K27Me3 in the heart. The residual H3K27Me3 that was still seen after Ezh2 deletion was probably due to the presence of Ezh2 in the cells where Nkx2.5-cre was inactive. Alternatively, the residual H3K27Me3 could be ascribed to Ezh1, which was not affected by the cardiac-specific deletion of Ezh2. Ezh1 was able to provide partial functional compensation for the loss of Ezh2 in the maintenance of stem cell identity [18], however, the severe cardiovascular phenotypes and 100% immediate postnatal demise of Ezh2fl/fl:Nkx2.5-cre+ mice argued that very little or no functional redundancy between Ezh1 and Ezh2 exists in the context of cardiac structural morphogenesis.

Finally, another interesting aspect is how Ezh2 activity is regulated and how that regulation affects cardiogenesis. One of the major regulatory mechanisms that modulate Ezh2 function is posttranslational modification, i.e. phosphorylation [57], [58]. More recently, Ezh2 was identified as a target of SUMO modification [59], a covalent conjugation process that is mediated by a series of enzymes and is emerging as an important regulator of cardiac development and function [60], [61]. How these modulations affect Ezh2 function, and consequently, impinge on embryonic heart development is an interesting topic to explore in the future.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Significantly up-regulated genes in the Ezh2 mutant hearts at E16.5 as analyzed by microarray (n = 3 for WT and Ezh2-cKO, respectively). The threshold of fold change was set at>or = 1.5.


Table S2.

Significantly down-regulated genes in the Ezh2 mutant hearts at E16.5 as analyzed by microarray (n = 3 for WT and Ezh2-cKO, respectively). The threshold of fold change was set at<or = 0.75.



The authors would like to thank Dr. James T. Willerson for the support of the work.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LC JW. Performed the experiments: LC YM EYK WY LQ JW. Analyzed the data: LC JW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RJS. Wrote the paper: LC JW.


  1. 1. Wu JC, Child JS (2004) Common congenital heart disorders in adults. Curr Probl Cardiol 29: 641–700.
  2. 2. Brutsaert DL (2003) Cardiac endothelial-myocardial signaling: its role in cardiac growth, contractile performance, and rhythmicity. Physiol Rev 83: 59–115.
  3. 3. Olson EN (2004) A decade of discoveries in cardiac biology. Nat Med 10: 467–474.
  4. 4. Person AD, Klewer SE, Runyan RB (2005) Cell biology of cardiac cushion development. Int Rev Cytol 243: 287–335.
  5. 5. Fouse SD, Shen Y, Pellegrini M, Cole S, Meissner A, et al. (2008) Promoter CpG methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation in parallel with Oct4/Nanog, PcG complex, and histone H3 K4/K27 trimethylation. Cell Stem Cell 2: 160–169.
  6. 6. Esteller M (2007) Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer: the DNA hypermethylome. Hum Mol Genet 16 Spec No 1: R50–59.
  7. 7. Tanay A, O'Donnell AH, Damelin M, Bestor TH (2007) Hyperconserved CpG domains underlie Polycomb-binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 5521–5526.
  8. 8. Pasini D, Bracken AP, Jensen MR, Lazzerini Denchi E, Helin K (2004) Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase activity. EMBO J 23: 4061–4071.
  9. 9. Cao R, Zhang Y (2004) SUZ12 is required for both the histone methyltransferase activity and the silencing function of the EED-EZH2 complex. Mol Cell 15: 57–67.
  10. 10. Wilkinson FH, Park K, Atchison ML (2006) Polycomb recruitment to DNA in vivo by the YY1 REPO domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 19296–19301.
  11. 11. Shi B, Liang J, Yang X, Wang Y, Zhao Y, et al. (2007) Integration of estrogen and Wnt signaling circuits by the polycomb group protein EZH2 in breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol 27: 5105–5119.
  12. 12. Lee ST, Li Z, Wu Z, Aau M, Guan P, et al. (2011) Context-Specific Regulation of NF-kappaB Target Gene Expression by EZH2 in Breast Cancers. Mol Cell 43: 798–810.
  13. 13. Bracken AP, Pasini D, Capra M, Prosperini E, Colli E, et al. (2003) EZH2 is downstream of the pRB-E2F pathway, essential for proliferation and amplified in cancer. EMBO J 22: 5323–5335.
  14. 14. Conerly ML, MacQuarrie KL, Fong AP, Yao Z, Tapscott SJ (2011) Polycomb-mediated repression during terminal differentiation: what don't you want to be when you grow up? Genes Dev 25: 997–1003.
  15. 15. Chase A, Cross NC (2011) Aberrations of EZH2 in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17: 2613–2618.
  16. 16. Li X, Gonzalez ME, Toy K, Filzen T, Merajver SD, et al. (2009) Targeted overexpression of EZH2 in the mammary gland disrupts ductal morphogenesis and causes epithelial hyperplasia. Am J Pathol 175: 1246–1254.
  17. 17. Fussbroich B, Wagener N, Macher-Goeppinger S, Benner A, Falth M, et al. (2011) EZH2 depletion blocks the proliferation of colon cancer cells. PLoS One 6: e21651.
  18. 18. Shen X, Liu Y, Hsu YJ, Fujiwara Y, Kim J, et al. (2008) EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency. Mol Cell 32: 491–502.
  19. 19. Wu ZL, Zheng SS, Li ZM, Qiao YY, Aau MY, et al. (2010) Polycomb protein EZH2 regulates E2F1-dependent apoptosis through epigenetically modulating Bim expression. Cell Death Differ 17: 801–810.
  20. 20. O'Carroll D, Erhardt S, Pagani M, Barton SC, Surani MA, et al. (2001) The polycomb-group gene Ezh2 is required for early mouse development. Mol Cell Biol 21: 4330–4336.
  21. 21. Ezhkova E, Lien WH, Stokes N, Pasolli HA, Silva JM, et al. (2011) EZH1 and EZH2 cogovern histone H3K27 trimethylation and are essential for hair follicle homeostasis and wound repair. Genes Dev 25: 485–498.
  22. 22. Wyngaarden LA, Delgado-Olguin P, Su IH, Bruneau BG, Hopyan S (2011) Ezh2 regulates anteroposterior axis specification and proximodistal axis elongation in the developing limb. Development 138: 3759–3767.
  23. 23. Su IH, Basavaraj A, Krutchinsky AN, Hobert O, Ullrich A, et al. (2003) Ezh2 controls B cell development through histone H3 methylation and Igh rearrangement. Nat Immunol 4: 124–131.
  24. 24. Caretti G, Di Padova M, Micales B, Lyons GE, Sartorelli V (2004) The Polycomb Ezh2 methyltransferase regulates muscle gene expression and skeletal muscle differentiation. Genes Dev 18: 2627–2638.
  25. 25. Han P, Hang CT, Yang J, Chang CP (2011) Chromatin remodeling in cardiovascular development and physiology. Circ Res 108: 378–396.
  26. 26. van Weerd JH, Koshiba-Takeuchi K, Kwon C, Takeuchi JK (2011) Epigenetic factors and cardiac development. Cardiovasc Res 91: 203–211.
  27. 27. Moses KA, DeMayo F, Braun RM, Reecy JL, Schwartz RJ (2001) Embryonic expression of an Nkx2-5/Cre gene using ROSA26 reporter mice. Genesis 31: 176–180.
  28. 28. Gordadze AV, Peng R, Tan J, Liu G, Sutton R, et al. (2001) Notch1IC partially replaces EBNA2 function in B cells immortalized by Epstein-Barr virus. J Virol 75: 5899–5912.
  29. 29. Curry CL, Reed LL, Golde TE, Miele L, Nickoloff BJ, et al. (2005) Gamma secretase inhibitor blocks Notch activation and induces apoptosis in Kaposi's sarcoma tumor cells. Oncogene 24: 6333–6344.
  30. 30. Wang J, Zhang H, Iyer D, Feng XH, Schwartz RJ (2008) Regulation of cardiac specific nkx2.5 gene activity by small ubiquitin-like modifier. J Biol Chem 283: 23235–23243.
  31. 31. Wang J, Li A, Wang Z, Feng X, Olson EN, et al. (2007) Myocardin sumoylation transactivates cardiogenic genes in pluripotent 10T1/2 fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 27: 622–632.
  32. 32. Kim EY, Chen L, Ma Y, Yu W, Chang J, et al. (2011) Expression of sumoylation deficient nkx2.5 mutant in nkx2.5 haploinsufficient mice leads to congenital heart defects. PLoS One 6: e20803.
  33. 33. Niessen K, Fu Y, Chang L, Hoodless PA, McFadden D, et al. (2008) Slug is a direct Notch target required for initiation of cardiac cushion cellularization. J Cell Biol 182: 315–325.
  34. 34. Akiyama H, Chaboissier MC, Behringer RR, Rowitch DH, Schedl A, et al. (2004) Essential role of Sox9 in the pathway that controls formation of cardiac valves and septa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 6502–6507.
  35. 35. Harrelson Z, Kelly RG, Goldin SN, Gibson-Brown JJ, Bollag RJ, et al. (2004) Tbx2 is essential for patterning the atrioventricular canal and for morphogenesis of the outflow tract during heart development. Development 131: 5041–5052.
  36. 36. de la Pompa JL, Timmerman LA, Takimoto H, Yoshida H, Elia AJ, et al. (1998) Role of the NF-ATc transcription factor in morphogenesis of cardiac valves and septum. Nature 392: 182–186.
  37. 37. Shirai M, Imanaka-Yoshida K, Schneider MD, Schwartz RJ, Morisaki T (2009) T-box 2, a mediator of Bmp-Smad signaling, induced hyaluronan synthase 2 and Tgfbeta2 expression and endocardial cushion formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 18604–18609.
  38. 38. Niessen K, Karsan A (2008) Notch signaling in cardiac development. Circ Res 102: 1169–1181.
  39. 39. Fischer A, Gessler M (2007) Delta-Notch–and then? Protein interactions and proposed modes of repression by Hes and Hey bHLH factors. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 4583–4596.
  40. 40. Diez H, Fischer A, Winkler A, Hu CJ, Hatzopoulos AK, et al. (2007) Hypoxia-mediated activation of Dll4-Notch-Hey2 signaling in endothelial progenitor cells and adoption of arterial cell fate. Exp Cell Res 313: 1–9.
  41. 41. Iso T, Kedes L, Hamamori Y (2003) HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol 194: 237–255.
  42. 42. Ma Q, Zhou B, Pu WT (2008) Reassessment of Isl1 and Nkx2-5 cardiac fate maps using a Gata4-based reporter of Cre activity. Dev Biol 323: 98–104.
  43. 43. Liu W, Selever J, Wang D, Lu MF, Moses KA, et al. (2004) Bmp4 signaling is required for outflow-tract septation and branchial-arch artery remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 4489–4494.
  44. 44. Danielian PS, Muccino D, Rowitch DH, Michael SK, McMahon AP (1998) Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase. Curr Biol 8: 1323–1326.
  45. 45. Jiang X, Rowitch DH, Soriano P, McMahon AP, Sucov HM (2000) Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development 127: 1607–1616.
  46. 46. High FA, Epstein JA (2008) The multifaceted role of Notch in cardiac development and disease. Nat Rev Genet 9: 49–61.
  47. 47. Noseda M, McLean G, Niessen K, Chang L, Pollet I, et al. (2004) Notch activation results in phenotypic and functional changes consistent with endothelial-to-mesenchymal transformation. Circ Res 94: 910–917.
  48. 48. Leimeister C, Externbrink A, Klamt B, Gessler M (1999) Hey genes: a novel subfamily of hairy- and Enhancer of split related genes specifically expressed during mouse embryogenesis. Mech Dev 85: 173–177.
  49. 49. Gessler M, Knobeloch KP, Helisch A, Amann K, Schumacher N, et al. (2002) Mouse gridlock: no aortic coarctation or deficiency, but fatal cardiac defects in Hey2 −/− mice. Curr Biol 12: 1601–1604.
  50. 50. Donovan J, Kordylewska A, Jan YN, Utset MF (2002) Tetralogy of fallot and other congenital heart defects in Hey2 mutant mice. Curr Biol 12: 1605–1610.
  51. 51. Sakata Y, Koibuchi N, Xiang F, Youngblood JM, Kamei CN, et al. (2006) The spectrum of cardiovascular anomalies in CHF1/Hey2 deficient mice reveals roles in endocardial cushion, myocardial and vascular maturation. J Mol Cell Cardiol 40: 267–273.
  52. 52. Liu Y, Yu M, Wu L, Chin MT (2010) The bHLH transcription factor CHF1/Hey2 regulates susceptibility to apoptosis and heart failure after pressure overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298: H2082–2092.
  53. 53. Rutenberg JB, Fischer A, Jia H, Gessler M, Zhong TP, et al. (2006) Developmental patterning of the cardiac atrioventricular canal by Notch and Hairy-related transcription factors. Development 133: 4381–4390.
  54. 54. Leimeister C, Dale K, Fischer A, Klamt B, Hrabe de Angelis M, et al. (2000) Oscillating expression of c-Hey2 in the presomitic mesoderm suggests that the segmentation clock may use combinatorial signaling through multiple interacting bHLH factors. Dev Biol 227: 91–103.
  55. 55. Doetzlhofer A, Basch ML, Ohyama T, Gessler M, Groves AK, et al. (2009) Hey2 regulation by FGF provides a Notch-independent mechanism for maintaining pillar cell fate in the organ of Corti. Dev Cell 16: 58–69.
  56. 56. Timmerman LA, Grego-Bessa J, Raya A, Bertran E, Perez-Pomares JM, et al. (2004) Notch promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition during cardiac development and oncogenic transformation. Genes Dev 18: 99–115.
  57. 57. Wu SC, Zhang Y (2011) Cyclin-dependent Kinase 1 (CDK1)-mediated Phosphorylation of Enhancer of Zeste 2 (Ezh2) Regulates Its Stability. J Biol Chem 286: 28511–28519.
  58. 58. Cha TL, Zhou BP, Xia W, Wu Y, Yang CC, et al. (2005) Akt-mediated phosphorylation of EZH2 suppresses methylation of lysine 27 in histone H3. Science 310: 306–310.
  59. 59. Riising EM, Boggio R, Chiocca S, Helin K, Pasini D (2008) The polycomb repressive complex 2 is a potential target of SUMO modifications. PLoS ONE 3: e2704.
  60. 60. Wang J, Chen L, Wen S, Zhu H, Yu W, et al. (2011) Defective sumoylation pathway directs congenital heart disease. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 91: 468–476.
  61. 61. Wang J (2011) Cardiac function and disease: emerging role of small ubiquitin-related modifier. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 3: 446–457.