Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Testing the Emergence of New Caledonia: Fig Wasp Mutualism as a Case Study and a Review of Evidence

  • Astrid Cruaud ,

    cruaud@supagro.inra.fr

    Affiliation INRA-UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, Montferrier-sur Lez, France

  • Roula Jabbour-Zahab,

    Affiliation INRA-UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, Montferrier-sur Lez, France

  • Gwenaëlle Genson,

    Affiliation INRA-UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, Montferrier-sur Lez, France

  • Stefan Ungricht,

    Affiliation ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

  • Jean-Yves Rasplus

    Affiliation INRA-UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, Montferrier-sur Lez, France

Testing the Emergence of New Caledonia: Fig Wasp Mutualism as a Case Study and a Review of Evidence

  • Astrid Cruaud, 
  • Roula Jabbour-Zahab, 
  • Gwenaëlle Genson, 
  • Stefan Ungricht, 
  • Jean-Yves Rasplus
PLOS
x

Abstract

While geologists suggest that New Caledonian main island (Grande Terre) was submerged until ca 37 Ma, biologists are struck by the presence of supposedly Gondwanan groups on the island. Among these groups are the Oreosycea fig trees (Ficus, Moraceae) and their Dolichoris pollinators (Hymenoptera, Agaonidae). These partners are distributed in the Paleotropics and Australasia, suggesting that their presence on New Caledonia could result from Gondwanan vicariance. To test this hypothesis, we obtained mitochondrial and nuclear markers (5.3 kb) from 28 species of Dolichoris, used all available sequences for Oreosycea, and conducted phylogenetic and dating analyses with several calibration strategies. All our analyses ruled out a vicariance scenario suggesting instead that New Caledonian colonization by Dolichoris and Oreosycea involved dispersal across islands from Sundaland ca 45.9-32.0 Ma. Our results show that successful long-distance dispersal of obligate mutualists may happen further suggesting that presence of intimate mutualisms on isolated islands should not be used as a priori evidence for vicariance. Comparing our results to a review of all the published age estimates for New Caledonian plant and animal taxa, we showed that support for a vicariant origin of the island biota is still lacking. Finally, as demonstrating a causal relationship between geology and biology requires independent evidence, we argue that a priori assumptions about vicariance or dispersal should not be used to constrain chronograms. This circular reasoning could lead to under or overestimation of age estimates.

Introduction

The New Caledonia archipelago (Grande Terre, Loyalty Islands, Isle of Pines, and a number of smaller islands) is isolated in the southwest Pacific. These islands are roughly located 1220 km east of Australia, 1700 km north of New Zealand, 1000 km south of the Solomon Islands, and about 400 km southwest of the Vanuatu archipelago [1]. New Caledonia, and especially Grande Terre, is known as a biodiversity hotspot due to its diverse, endemic, and threatened biota [2], [3]. Until recently, the high level of diversity, the old age of New Caledonia's geological basement and the presence of some ancient groups were taken as evidence that Grande Terre (hereafter shortly named “New Caledonia”) was a Gondwanan refuge where plants (e.g. Amborella [4], Nothofagus [5], Araucaria [6], Ficus [7]) and vertebrates (e.g. the Kagu flightless bird from the monotypic family Rhynochetidae [8]) have survived for more than 90 Myr [1]. However, recent geological evidence suggest that the New Caledonian region experienced complete submersion until ca 37 Ma [9], [10], [11] and no mainland area was above sea level between the Cretaceous and the Late Eocene [12]. This implies that the present day biota of New Caledonia must comprise neo-endemics evolved from Cenozoic transoceanic dispersers [1]. However, to explain an apparent mosaic assemblage of taxa of different ages, some biogeographers questioned a complete submersion of the island [13], [14] and some proposed that old taxa could have survived on ephemeral habitats until New Caledonia's emersion [15], [16]. Therefore, New Caledonia is immersed in a controversy over the age and origin of its biota.

Among the emblematic and putative Gondawanan groups occurring in New Caledonia are the fig trees (Ficus, Moraceae) and their associated pollinators (Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae) [7]. New Caledonia hosts 24 endemic Ficus species all belonging to the section Oreosycea (subgenus Pharmacosycea) and pollinated by wasps from the genus Dolichoris [17], some of them endangered, threatened by habitat destruction [18]. Corner [19] hypothesized that the Coral Sea area including today's main island of New Caledonia was the radiation centre of this group of monoecious fig trees. In New Caledonia, evolutionary radiation of Oreosycea figs as well as their pollinators were accompanied by high ecological and morphological disparity among species (habit, fruit position, leaf shape; head shape, mandible size) [19], [20]. Oreosycea fig trees and their pollinators are distributed in the Paleotropics and Australasia, suggesting vicariance resulting from the break-up of east-Gondwanaland [7] (see materials and methods and Table S1, for the detailed taxonomy and distribution). Moreover, available age estimates (ca 70-45 Ma for the figs [21] and 95-46 Ma for the wasps [22]) are contemporaneous with the opening of the Tasman Sea that started 83 Ma and ended 52 Ma [11], [23], [24]. Here, we propose to test whether a vicariance scenario could explain the presence of both partners on New Caledonia. Answering this question is of particular importance to debates concerning New Caledonia's history. First, figs are a major resources for tropical ecosystems [25], and one can suppose that the biogeographical history of numerous frugivores is linked to those of fig-pollinator mutualists. Second, pollinating fig wasps are mostly associated to a single species of Ficus and neither partner can reproduce without the other. Successful dispersal of obligate mutualisms requires to quickly find one another after independent dispersal [26]. Theoretically [27] and intuitively, mutualisms appear less prone to successful dispersion over long distance than single species. Consequently, they might be viewed as evidence of ancient vicariance. Moreover, testing a vicariance scenario may also shed light on the dispersal ability of mutualisms.

We obtained nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences (5.3 kb) from all major lineages of the genus Dolichoris and gathered all the Oreosycea sequences published so far. We conducted phylogenetic analyses on both datasets, though due to undersampling of fig species we only used the fig wasp dataset to conduct relaxed molecular dating analyses with several calibration strategies. Since the review by Grandcolas et al. [1], including 11 taxa, a great number of studies including New Caledonian groups have been published (see Table S4). We then conducted an up to date review of all dated, molecular-based phylogenies incorporating New Caledonian taxa and compared these age estimates to our results.

Materials and Methods

Taxonomic sampling and laboratory protocols

Oreosycea figs and their associated pollinators are distributed in the Paleotropics, Australasia (mostly New Caledonia and Papua) and South-East Asia [17], [19]. A few species are known from Africa and Madagascar [28] and only one species occurs in Australia [29]. The detailed taxonomy and distribution of Oreosycea fig trees is provided in Table S1. The section is divided into two subsections: Glandulosae and Pedunculatae [30]. The sub-section Glandulosae contains two groups of fig trees: the «Ficus austrocaledonia group» that comprises 27 species restricted to Pacific Islands (among which 24 are endemic to New Caledonia, 2 to Solomon Islands and 1 to Vanuatus), and the «Ficus nervosa group» that contains 23 species from India to the Solomon Islands. The Subsection Pedunculatae includes nine species, three of which are widely distributed from India and Continental Asia to Wallace line and Australia.

We included 28 species of Dolichoris representing three times the number of described species and about 33% of the world estimated diversity (Rasplus, unpublished). Twenty-one of these species are new to science (numbered sp. 01 to sp. 21). They pollinate 23 of the 59 Oreosycea known species. Sixteen Dolichoris species pollinate Ficus belonging to the F. austrocaledonica group, fourteen of which are endemic to New Caledonia. Nine Dolichoris species pollinate figs of the F. nervosa group and three species figs of the sub-section Pedunculatae. None of these species were endangered or protected species. Field studies have been funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR project “BioNEOCAL” to J.Y. Rasplus). Eight species belonging to the genera Ceratosolen, Pegoscapus, Pleistodontes and Tetrapus (Agaonidae) were used as outgroups [31]. To test the relationship of Blastophaga (s.s.) with the genus Dolichoris [31], Blastophaga psenes, the type species of the genus, was also included in our analyses. All material was collected alive and fixed in 95% EtOH. Vouchers are deposited at CBGP (Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations), Montferrier-sur-Lez, France. A list of all sampled species is given in Table S2. Extraction, amplification and sequencing protocols follow Cruaud et al. [31], [32]. Our final dataset was composed of six concatenated gene regions: 1) two nuclear genes: F2 copy of elongation factor-1a (EF-1a, 516 bp) and wingless (Wg, 403 bp); 2) two mitochondrial genes: cytochrome oxidase I (COI, 1449 bp) and cytochrome b (Cytb, 744 bp); and, 3) two nuclear ribosomal genes: 28S rRNA (D2–D3 and D4–D5 expansion regions, 1405 bp) and 18S rRNA (variable regions V3–5, 772 bp). All sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table S2). The Oreosycea phylogeny was reconstructed from all the sequences available in GenBank. The final dataset was comprised of ITS (891 bp), ETS (528 bp) and G3pdh (769 bp) sequences from 11 Oreosycea species and 8 outgroup species. F. carica which is pollinated by Blastophaga psenes was also included (Table S3).

Phylogenetic and dating analyses

Protein-coding genes and hypervariable regions were aligned using ClustalW 1.81 default settings [33]. The alignment of rRNA sequences was based on secondary structure models [31], [34], [35]. The most appropriate model of gene evolution for each data subset (mitochondrial genes, EF-1a, rRNA stems and loops for wasps and ETS, ITS and G3pdh for figs) was identified using the Akaike information criterion implemented in MrAIC.pl 1.4.3 [36]. Phylogenetic trees were estimated using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods. Analyses were conducted on a 150 cores Linux Cluster at CBGP. We performed ML analyses and associated bootstrapping using the MPI-parallelized RAxML 7.0.4 [37]. GTRCAT approximation of models was used for ML bootstrapping [38] (1000 replicates). Bayesian analyses of phylogenetic relationships and dating analyses were conducted using BEAST v 1.5.4 [39]. Indeed, recent studies have shown that models assuming independent molecular rates in adjacent branches perform better than those assuming a degree of rate autocorrelation especially on extended taxon sampling [40] (but see [41]). Due to insufficient sampling in the fig dataset, dating analyses were conducted only on the fig wasp dataset. Several calibration strategies have been examined to assess their effect on estimating the age of New Caledonian colonisation. Two Agaonid fossils belonging to the genera Tetrapus and Pegoscapus dated to the Burdigalian (20.4-16.0 Ma) have been described from the Dominican amber [42]. We first used these fossils to specify prior age distributions for the corresponding nodes (crown groups) by using 1) uniform (15.0–30.0 Ma), 2) normal (mean = 20; stdev = 3.0; 95% highest posterior density intervals (HPD) = 15.0–24.9 Ma) and 3) lognormal (offset = 15; log(mean) = 1.0; log(stdev) = 1.0; 95% HPD = 15.5–29.1 Ma) distributions successively. We then combined these fossil calibrations with geological information by specifying priors for the node grouping taxa endemic to Vanuatu islands. We implemented two distributions: 1) a lognormal prior distribution (offset = 0; log(mean) = 1.0; log(stdev) = 1.0; 95% HPD = 0.5–14.1 Ma) and 2) a normal prior distribution (mean = 2.0; stdev = 0.5; 95% HPD = 1.18–2.82 Ma). The shapes of the distributions used allowed for different degrees of uncertainty in fossil estimates, geological estimates and timing of island colonisation, which may impact the results. With the exception of a Yule tree prior, default priors were used for all parameters. Two runs of 60 000 000 generations were performed with sampling every 6000 generations. The two separate runs were then combined using LogCombiner ver. 1.5.4. We ensured convergence for each parameter using both TRACER ver. 1.5 and AWTY [43]. Following the removal of 10% burn-in, the sampled posterior trees were summarized using TreeAnnotator ver. 1.5.4 to generate a maximum clade credibility tree and calculate the mean ages, 95% highest posterior density intervals and posterior probabilities (PP).

Review of studies including New Caledonian taxa

We reviewed the literature on dated, molecular-based phylogenies incorporating New Caledonian taxa in order to assess whether biological data contradict or agree with geological evidence of a complete submersion of New Caledonia until ca 37 Ma. As often as possible, and when available or applicable, we tried to report both mean stem and crown ages with their 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals. Indeed, one must keep in mind that the age of the stem group is the time of divergence of the given group from its sister taxon and the age of the crown group is the time of the deepest bifurcation within the given group [44]. Therefore, a colonisation event can be inferred at any time between the stem and the crown ages and the most conservative window of possible colonisation times is given by the upper 95% HPD interval of the first estimate and the lower 95% HPD interval of the second estimate (e.g. [45]). To be conservative, when authors reported variation on age estimates, we always kept the oldest estimate. All studies that used the emergence of New Caledonia (ca 37 Ma) as calibration point were discarded.

Results

Phylogenetic and dating analyses

Bayesian and ML tree topologies were similar, only differing in the support of few clades and we arbitrarily chose to map node support values on the bayesian topologies (Figure 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Maximum clade credibility trees obtained for Oreosycea fig trees (a) and chronogram showing the timing of evolution of their pollinating wasps (b).

The chronogram showing the timing of evolution of Dolichoris fig wasps is derived from the sixth calibration set shown in Table 1. Grey bars around mean node ages (Ma) indicate the 95% HPD intervals. The geological time-scale is shown at the bottom. Bootstrap supports (higher than 65) and posterior probabilities (higher than 0.90) are indicated at nodes. The delineation of biogeographical regions follows Kreft [88] Afr: Africa, Ar-Sin: Arabo-Sindic; Aus: Australia, Ind-Chi: Indo-China, Ind: India, Med: Mediterranean; NC: New Caledonia, NG: New Guinea, Phi: Philippines, Sul: Sulawesi, Sun: Sundaland, Van: Vanuatu. Stars indicate probable misidentifications of host Ficus in Genbank. Dolichoris and Oreosycea species are highlighted in bold blue.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030941.g001

All Dolichoris species clustered in a strongly supported clade (BP = 87; PP = 1.00). The Afrotropical species D. flabellatus was recovered sister to the remaining Dolichoris with strong support (BP = 71; PP = 1.00). The next node should be considered a polytomy of five subclades as supports for relationships are weak: 1) Blastophaga psenes (Arabo-sindic, Mediterranean); 2) D. malabarensis; 3) D. vasculosae (both Indo-China, Sundaland, Sulawesi, Philippines); 4) the pollinators of the F. nervosa group (Indo-China, Sundaland, Sulawesi, Philippines, New Guinea); and 5) Dolichoris from New Caledonia and Vanuatu. Dolichoris species from Vanuatu and Loyalty Islands are deeply nested within a strongly supported clade of Dolichoris endemic to Grande Terre (BP = 100; PP = 1.00).

Oreosycea was not recovered as monophyletic but instead formed two groups, a result already observed by Weiblen [46] and Rønsted et al. [47]. The F. albipila group (F. albipila (Indo-China, Sundaland, New Guinea, Australia) and F. dicranostyla (Africa)) appeared only distantly related to the remaining Oreosycea (BP = 81; PP = 1.00). F. nervosa (Indo-China), F. callosa (Indo-China, Sundaland, Sulawesi, Philippines) and F.vasculosa (Indo-China, Sundaland, Sulawesi, Philippines), were recovered sister to a well supported clade grouping species from New Caledonia, New Guinea and Sulawesi. BEAST results showed that all gene regions greatly deviate from a strict clock model (ucld.stdev greater than 1.0 for each marker) and that there is no strong evidence of rate autocorrelation in our phylogeny (covariance values spanning zero). As expected, fossil and geological calibrations chosen as well as the method for applying constraints to the nodes have a great impact on divergence time estimates (Table 1). The less informative the priors (uniform), the wider the credibility intervals of the posterior estimates. A normal distribution assuming a colonisation of Vanuatu Archipelago just after the emergence of the present islands ca 2 Ma [48] gives younger estimates (about 10 Myr younger). The split between New Caledonian Dolichoris and their closest relatives was estimated to a mean age ranging from 54.9 to 31.3 Ma. The most recent common ancestor of the New Caledonian diversification was estimated to a mean age ranging from 40.3 to 22.8 Ma. The colonisation of New Guinea occurred later with a mean stem age ranging from 32.2 to 18.4 Ma and a mean crown age ranging from 21.1 to 11.9 Ma. All these estimates were in agreement with previous results based on independent datasets [22].

Review of studies including New Caledonian taxa

Our review includes 47 studies focusing on 54 different taxa (6 vertebrates, 24 arthropods, 24 plants) with different levels of endemicity (species, genus, family) (see Table S4 for details). Figure 2 summarizes the estimates of crown and/or stem divergence times obtained for each taxon. In about 75% of the groups in which divergence ages have been estimated using different markers, dating methods, and calibration points, both crown and stem mean ages postdate New Caledonia emergence (ca 37 Ma). About 16% of the groups had mean stem ages that predate New Caledonia emergence but their mean crown ages date back at most to 41.1 Ma. For five groups, the literature only reports stem ages, and three of them, namely Amborella trichopoda, Oncotheca balansae, and Beauprea montana, exceed 80 Ma.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Review of the divergence time estimates for 50 New Caledonian clades.

Taxon names refer to the list provided in Table S4. “Dolichoris 2” refers to the present study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030941.g002

Discussion

Timing of arrival in New Caledonia

Vicariance hypothesis predicts that the stem Dolichoris estimate should be older than the separation of Zealandia from Gondwana ca 80 Ma [23]. However, our dating analyses revealed that the split between New Caledonian species and their closest relatives is more recent. With the exception of the most uninformative calibration strategy (single calibration with uniform distribution, [49], [50]), even the upper confidence limit of our age estimate (76.5 Ma) rules out the latter hypothesis. Therefore, Dolichoris and their host figs have probably colonised New Caledonia by dispersal and not by lineage survival on islands formed by tectonic breakup of Gondwana.

A vicariance scenario is not supported by any of the age estimates published to date. Indeed, a post Bartonian (ca 40.3 Ma) colonisation cannot be rejected for any extant taxa (Figure 2 and Table S4), corroborating the observations of Grandcolas et al. (2008). Moreover, in most groups, both the colonisation and the diversification are relatively recent, contradicting the view that the native biota of New Caledonia is primarily a product of a long isolation [51], [52].

Even if three hypothetical vicariant groups, Amborella trichopoda, the subfamily Oncothecaceae and the genus Beauprea, seem to challenge other evidence, the available data appear uninformative with regard to their New Caledonian history. Although the genus Beauprea and the subfamily Oncothecaceae contain 13 and two species respectively, the published estimates are only based on one extant species per taxon allowing the estimation of stem ages only. Therefore, including other extant species, fossils or yet undiscovered species belonging to these groups is required to draw more compelling conclusions. The monotypic family Amborellaceae is likely a product of one of the oldest lineage-splitting events in all angiosperms [4] and has an extremely restricted present-day distribution. It seems therefore unlikely that it is the sole member of its lineage ever to have evolved [53]. Consequently, this phylogenetic relict, often referred to when arguing for a Gondwanan origin of the New Caledonian biota, should not be considered as informative [1], [54].

Some authors argued that the age estimates for the New Caledonian colonisation are underestimated because analyses are based on inaccurate fossil or biogeographic calibration priors [16], [55]. For example, Heads [16], [55] underlines that authors should not rely on the fossil record to set maximum age constraint on a given clade. It has been shown that using fossil evidence as «hard» minimum bounds (point calibrations) can result in underestimation of divergence times [49], [56]. However, the recently developed methods we used are able to incorporate calibration uncertainty using «soft» priors with parametric distributions [49], [57]. It has been also shown that taxa can be older than the land they inhabit (e.g. [58]), which is why using the formation of islands as hard maximum bounds is inappropriate in some cases. To date, Dolichoris species are known only from the southern part of the Vanuatu archipelago that emerged ca 2 Ma (Tanna and Anatom islands, [48]). For this reason, the use of a normal prior distribution centered at 2 Ma and covering a narrow range with 95% probability (1.18–2.82 Ma) for the node grouping Vanuatu endemics would appear justified. However, Vanuatu's ecosystems have formed during the last ca 25 Myr [59], [60] and we cannot rule out an older colonisation of the archipelago by the fig wasp mutualism. The biodiversity of the archipelago is still poorly known and endemics might have existed further north, on older islands. Therefore the use of a lognormal prior with a rigid minimum bound of zero and covering a wider range (0.5–14.1 Ma with 95% HPD), provides a more conservative calibration approach. This strategy resulted in 10 Myr older estimates for the New Caledonian colonisation (Table 1). This shows that a priori assumptions about the biogeographical history of lineages can have important effects on divergence time estimates. Even if geological events, such as the formation of islands, can offer plausible instances of maximum age bounds, these bounds must be chosen carefully. Using a too recent dispersal event as constraint on the origin of a given clade can result in underestimation of the age of all the lineages. Conversely and although this is advocated by some authors as the only accurate method to date New Caledonian colonisation [55], [61], constraining chronograms according to the ages of putative vicariance events would prevent vicariance falsification and could result in overestimation of divergence ages. Here, even under the most conservative dating strategy, our analyses show that the colonisation of New Caledonia by Dolichoris postdates the break-up of Gondwanaland. Moreover, even if some of the published analyses could be refined using more appropriate calibration strategies, it is striking that not one supports a vicariance scenario. Therefore, in the light of our study and the published evidence, we suggest that the most credible hypothesis is that New Caledonian biota is comprised of descendents of Cenozoic waif dispersers.

Origin of New Caledonian colonisation

Most New Caledonian taxa share sister group relationships to taxa occurring in Australia, New Guinea, and New Zealand (see Table S4 and [55]). However, the origin of the lineages ancestral to New Caledonian endemics was rarely discussed in the studies we reviewed. Reconstruction of ancestral areas or inferences based on the closest outgroup node give ambiguous and contrasting results. This suggests that further analyses with representative sampling are still needed, to avoid reconstruction bias [54].

Interestingly, our results suggest an ancient colonisation of New Caledonia by Oreosycea and Dolichoris (ca 45.9-32.0 Ma) at a time when New Guinea was not yet formed and Sulawesi was divided in two islands [62]. The ancestors of the New Caledonian mutualists probably occurred somewhere in Sundaland and colonised independently New Caledonia and later Southern Sulawesi and New Guinea (ca 26.4-15.9 Ma). At least two colonisation route hypotheses can be proposed:

Hypothesis 1. From Sundaland directly to Australia and to New Caledonia.

Although it cannot be definitively ruled out, this hypothesis is weakened by 1) the long distance between Sundaland and Northern Australia during the Eocene and early Oligocene, which makes transoceanic dispersal of figs and figwasps less likely (but see [54]); 2) the presence of only one Oreosycea species in Australia (F. albipila), furthermore not related to the New Caledonian clade [19], [47]. F. albipila is a widely distributed fig tree and its presence in Australia could be explained by its high dispersal capacities [29].

Hypothesis 2. From Sundaland to North Sulawesi, Philippines, Halmahera and New Caledonia through a series of shorter overwater dispersal events between islands.

During the Eocene, distances between Sundaland, North Sulawesi, Philippines and Halmahera were relatively short [63] and may have enabled dispersal of the mutualists. About 45-43 Ma two subduction systems started and generated the Inner and the Outer (Vitiaz) Melanesian arcs [64]. All along the Vitiaz arc, an archipelago of volcanic islands probably occurred during the Eocene from north of present Papua to Vanuatu archipelago [65]. Further south, the Vitiaz arc was connected to New Caledonia by the Loyalty Ridge and the d'Entrecasteaux Ridge [11], [66]. Both the topology of our trees and the timing of New Caledonian colonisation suggest that these arcs have served as stepping stones for the eastward spread of Dolichoris and Oreosycea.

The stepping stones hypothesis predicts that close relatives of New Caledonian taxa should be present on the intermediate islands of the Vitiaz Arc. Indeed, two species of Oreosycea morphologically closely related to the New Caledonian species (F. magwana and F. bubulia [30], Table S1) occur in the Solomon Islands but we failed to collect and include them in our analyses. If the latter hypothesis is correct, their associated Dolichoris should be recovered sister to the New Caledonian clade by further phylogenetic analyses. Solomon Islands flora and fauna are still poorly known [51] and we suggest that taxa from this region, almost never included in studies, may be pivotal to our understating of the origin of New Caledonian fig mutualists. Once in New Caledonia, Dolichoris reached Vanuatu and Loyalties, ruling out the hypothesis that the current Loyalty islands have inherited their biota from previous ephemeral islands that dated back to Cretaceous [16].

Co-dispersion of mutualists

Ficus are among the first trees to recolonize isolated islands after volcanic eruption [67], [68] and their fruits are dispersed by several hundreds of vertebrate species [25]. Among them pigeons [69], [70] and flying floxes [71], [72] are the most likely dispersers of figs in the Pacific region. Ducula and Ptilinopus, two genera of pigeons present in New Caledonia, retain seeds longer than do most other frugivorous birds [73]. Pteropus bats often fly long distances between islands and fig seeds have been demonstrated to pass intact through their guts [74].

Fig trees cannot reproduce without pollinating wasps and consequently have to be pollinated during their life spans to sucessfully colonized a new range. Life spans of fig trees are poorly known but they vary from a few tens of years to over 2000 years in banyan figs [75]. One of the oldest verified specimen of angiosperm is a fig tree (F. religiosa) planted in 288 BC in Sri Lanka [76]. Therefore agaonid pollinators have had to cross great distance within an extremely small window of time (at most a few hundred of years) in order to colonize New Caledonia and establish. Agaonidae are short-lived wasps [77], [78] blown by the wing to carry pollen between trees [79], [80]. They are capable of long distance dispersal and can reach fig trees separated by a few hundreds of kilometres of ocean or desert [81], [82]. In Borneo, Dolichoris and Platyscapa species are the agaonid wasps that flight the highest, reaching 60 meters, above the canopy [80]. As a result of turbulence and drag from tree crowns, wind-speeds increase with height above the canopy for the first few tens of metres [83]. Therefore, it is not surprising to find Dolichoris species as New Caledonian colonizers. The potential dispersal range of Dolichoris must be wide and distances of hundred of kilometers could be no barrier.

Conclusion

In studies to distinguish between vicariance and/or dispersal in order to better explain the present-day distribution of biological groups, one must be cautious of circularity of argument [84]. This point seems of great importance here because the rejection of a complete submersion of New Caledonia is based on the presence of supposed Gondwanan groups on the island [14]. However, this circular logic is not based on scientific reasoning [1], [54]. Demonstrating causal relationships between geological phenomena and biological observations requires that geological and biological evidence are assessed independently [85]. Here, independently of any assumption about New Caledonian geological history, and using several calibration strategies, we provided evidence of an ancient dispersal for the fig wasp mutualism, a supposedly Gondwanan old group. This is the second example of a successful colonization of New Caledonia by mutualist partners. Indeed, dispersal to the island was already observed twice in the Phyllanthus/Epicephala obligate association [86], [87]. Therefore, while the presence of intimate mutualists on isolated islands might be viewed as evidence for vicariance our results highlight the fact that successful long-distance co-dispersal may occasionally happen. Finally, in reviewing the literature we showed that support for vicariant origins of any New Caledonian taxa is lacking. Therefore, biological data do not contradict but agree with geological evidence of a complete submersion of the island until ca 37 Ma.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Taxonomy and distribution of Oreosycea fig species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030941.s001

(DOC)

Table S2.

List of Dolichoris and outgroup species included in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030941.s002

(DOC)

Table S3.

List of Oreosycea and outgroup species included in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030941.s003

(DOC)

Table S4.

Details of studies included in the review of New Caledonia's biogeography.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030941.s004

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Philippe Birnbaum (CIRAD, France) and Da-Rong Yang (XTBG, China) for contributing samples. We also thank Alexandre Dehne Garcia and Arnaud Estoup (CBGP, Montpellier) for providing access to CBGP cluster computers. We are grateful to Philippe Grandcolas (MNHN, Paris) and Elizabeth Murray (UC, Riverside) for her careful reading of this manuscript and thoughtful suggestions for revisions. We would like to thank the efforts of Steven A. Trewick and one anonymous reviewer to improve the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AC JYR. Performed the experiments: RJZ GG. Analyzed the data: AC JYR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SU. Wrote the paper: AC JYR.

References

  1. 1. Grandcolas P, Murienne J, Robillard T, Desutter-Grandcolas L, Jourdan H, et al. (2008) New Caledonia: A very old Darwinian island? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 3309–3317.
  2. 2. Kier G, Kreft H, Lee TM, Jetz W, Ibisch PL, et al. (2009) A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 9322–9327.
  3. 3. Pascal M, Richer de Forges B, Le Guyader H, Simberloff D (2008) Mining and other threats to the New Caledonia biodiversity hotspot. Conserv Biol 22: 498–499.
  4. 4. Smith SA, Beaulieu JM, Donoghue MJ (2010) An uncorrelated relaxed-clock analysis suggests an earlier origin for flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 5897–5902.
  5. 5. Cook LG, Crisp MD (2005) Not so ancient: the extant crown group of Nothofagus represents a post-Gondwanan radiation. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 272: 2535–2544.
  6. 6. Setoguchi H, Osawa TA, Pintaud JC, Jaffre T, Veillon JM (1998) Phylogenetic relationships within Araucariaceae based on rbcL gene sequences. Am J Bot 85: 1507–1516.
  7. 7. Corner EJH (1963) Ficus in the Pacific Region. In: Gessitt JL, editor. Pacific Basin biogeography. pp. 233–243. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu.
  8. 8. Cracraft J (2000) Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous–Tertiary mass extinction event. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 268: 459–469.
  9. 9. Aitchison JC, Clarke L, Meffre S, Cluzel D (1995) Eocene arc-continent collision in New Caledonia and implications for regional Southwest Pacific tectonic evolution. Geology 23: 161–164.
  10. 10. Pelletier B (2006) Geology of the New Caledonia region and its implications for the study of the New Caledonian biodiversity. In: Payri C, Richer de Forges B, editors. Compendium of marine species from New Caledonia Documents Scientifiques et Techniques de l'IRD II7. pp. 19–32.
  11. 11. Schellart WP, Lister GS, Toy VG (2006) A Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic reconstruction of the Southwest Pacific region: Tectonics controlled by subduction and slab rollback processes. Earth-Sci Rev 76: 191–233.
  12. 12. Collot J, Herzer RH, Lafoy Y, Géli L (2009) Mesozoic history of the Fairway - Aotea Basin: implications regarding the early stages of Gondwana fragmentation. Geochem Geophy Geosy 10: Q12019.
  13. 13. Morat P, Veillon JM, MacKee HS (1984) Floristic relationships of New Caledonian rainforest phanerogams. In: Radovsky FJ, Raven PH, Sohmer SH, editors. Biogeography of the tropical Pacific: Bishop Museum Special Publication No. 72. Honolulu: pp. 71–128.
  14. 14. Lowry PP (1998) Diversity, endemism, and extinction in the flora of New Caledonia: a review. In: Peng CI, Lowry PP, editors. pp. 181–206. Rare, threatened, and endangered floras of Asia and the Pacific rim Academica Sinica Monograph 16 Institute of Botany, Taipei.
  15. 15. Ladiges PY, Cantrill D (2007) New Caledonia-Australian connections: biogeographic patterns and geology. Aust Syst Bot 20: 383–389.
  16. 16. Heads M (2008) Panbiogeography of New Caledonia, south-west Pacific: basal angiosperms on basement terranes, ultramafic endemics inherited from volcanic island arcs and old taxa endemic to young islands. J Biogeogr 35: 2153–2175.
  17. 17. Berg CC, Corner EJH (2005) Moraceae - Ficus. Flora Malesiana, Ser. I, 17/2. Leiden.
  18. 18. Ungricht S (2004) The endemic fig trees of New Caledonia: Quantitative assessment of collections for taxonomy, floristics and conservation. 165 p. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Montpellier II.
  19. 19. Corner EJH (1970) Ficus subgen. Pharmacosycea with reference to the species of New Caledonia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 259: 383–433.
  20. 20. Wiebes JT (1979) The fig wasps genus Dolichoris Hill (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae). Proc Kon Ned Akad v Wetensch 82: 181–196.
  21. 21. Rønsted N, Weiblen GD, Cook JM, Salamin N, Machado CA, et al. (2005) 60 million years of co-divergence in the fig-wasp symbiosis. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 272: 2593–2599.
  22. 22. Lopez-Vaamonde C, Cook JM, Rasplus J-Y, Machado CA, Weiblen G (2009) Molecular dating and biogeography of fig-pollinating wasps. Mol Phylogenet Evol 52: 715–726.
  23. 23. Neall VE, Trewick SA (2008) The age and origin of the Pacific islands: a geological overview. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 3293–3308.
  24. 24. Trewick SA, Paterson AM, Campbell HJ (2007) Hello New Zealand. J Biogeogr 34: 1–6.
  25. 25. Shanahan M, So S, Compton S, Corlett R (2001) Fig-eating by vertebrate frugivores: a global review. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76: 529–570.
  26. 26. Nobre T, Eggleton P, Aanen DK (2010) Vertical transmission as the key to the colonization of Madagascar by fungus-growing termites? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277: 359–365.
  27. 27. Mack KML (2011) Selective feedback between dispersal distance and the stability of mutualism. Oikos. in press.
  28. 28. Berg CC, Wiebes JT (1992) African fig trees and fig wasps. Amsterdam: Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. pp. 1–298.
  29. 29. Corner EJH (1985) Essays on Ficus. Allertonia 4: 125–168.
  30. 30. Berg CC (2002) Ficus subgenus Pharmacosycea section Oreosycea (Moraceae) in the Solomon islands, Fiji and the new Hebrides. Blumea 47: 299–314.
  31. 31. Cruaud A, Jabbour-Zahab R, Genson G, Cruaud C, Couloux A, et al. (2010) Laying the foundations for a new classification of Agaonidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), a multilocus phylogenetic approach. Cladistics 26: 359–387.
  32. 32. Cruaud A, Jabbour-Zahab R, Genson G, Couloux A, Yan-Qiong P, et al. (2011) Out-of-Australia and back again: the worldwide historical biogeography of non-pollinating fig wasps (Hymenoptera: Sycophaginae). J Biogeogr 38: 209–225.
  33. 33. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson JT (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignement through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680.
  34. 34. Gillespie JJ, Johnston JS, Cannone JJ, Gutell RR (2006) Characteristics of the nuclear (18S, 5.8S, 28S and 5S) and mitochondrial (12S and 16S) rRNA genes of Apis mellifera (Insecta: Hymenoptera): structure, organization and retrotransposable elements. Insect Mol Biol 15: 657–686.
  35. 35. Gillespie JJ, Munro JB, Heraty JM, Yoder MJ, Owen AK, et al. (2005) A secondary structural model of the 28S rRNA expansion segments D2 and D3 for chalcidoid wasps (Hymenoptera : Chalcidoidea). Mol Biol Evol 22: 1593–1608.
  36. 36. Nylander JAA (2004) MrAIC.pl. Program distributed by the author. 1.4.3 ed. Upssala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
  37. 37. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690.
  38. 38. Stamatakis A (2006) Phylogenetic models of rate heterogeneity: A High Performance Computing Perspective. 8 p. International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2006), Rhodes Island, Greece.
  39. 39. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7: 214–221.
  40. 40. Linder M, Britton T, Sennblad B (2011) Evaluation of bayesian models of substitution rate evolution - Parental guidance versus mutual independence. Syst Biol 60: 329–342.
  41. 41. Lepage T, Bryant D, Philippe H, Lartillot N (2007) A general comparison of relaxed molecular clock models. Mol Biol Evol 24: 2669–2680.
  42. 42. Penalver E, Engel MS, Grimaldi DA (2006) Fig wasps in Dominican amber (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae). Am Mus Novit 3541: 1–16.
  43. 43. Nylander JAA, Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL (2008) AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for grafical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24: 581–584.
  44. 44. Magallón S, Sanderson MJ (2001) Absolute diversification rates in Angiosperm clades. Evolution 55: 1762–1780.
  45. 45. Poux C, Madsen O, Marquard E, Vieites DR, de Jong WW, et al. (2005) Asynchronous colonization of Madagascar by the four endemic clades of primates, tenrecs, carnivores, and rodents as inferred from nuclear genes. Syst Biol 54: 719–730.
  46. 46. Weiblen GD (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of functionally dioecious Ficus (Moraceae) based on ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Am J Bot 87: 1342–1357.
  47. 47. Rønsted N, Weiblen G, Clement WL, Zerega NJC, Savolainen V (2008) Reconstructing the phylogeny of figs (Ficus, Moraceae) to reveal the history of the fig pollination mutualism. Symbiosis 45: 45–55.
  48. 48. Keppel G, Lowe AJ, Possingham HP (2009) Changing perspectives on the biogeography of the tropical South Pacific: influences of dispersal, vicariance and extinction. J Biogeogr 36: 1035–1054.
  49. 49. Yang Z, Rannala B (2006) Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Mol Biol Evol 23: 212–226.
  50. 50. Marshall (2008) A simple method for bracketing absolute divergence times on molecular phylogenies using multiple fossil calibration points. Am Nat 171: 726–742.
  51. 51. Thorne RF (1969) Floristic relationships between New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 255: 595–602.
  52. 52. Morat P (1993) The terrestrial biota of New Caledonia. Biodivers Lett 1: 69–71.
  53. 53. Carpenter KJ (2005) Stomatal architecture and evolution in basal angiosperms. Am J Bot 92: 1595–1615.
  54. 54. Crisp MD, Trewick SA, Cook LG (2011) Hypothesis testing in biogeography. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 66–72.
  55. 55. Heads M (2010) Biogeographical affinities of the New Caledonian biota: a puzzle with 24 pieces. J Biogeogr 37: 1179–1201.
  56. 56. Graur D, Martin W (2004) Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision. Trends Genet 20: 80–86.
  57. 57. Ho SYW, Phillips MJ (2009) Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Syst Biol 58: 367–380.
  58. 58. Brandley MC, Wang Y, Guo X, de Oca ANM, Feria Ortiz M, et al. (2010) Bermuda as an evolutionary life raft for an ancient lineage of endangered lizards. PLoS ONE 5: e11375.
  59. 59. Peate DW, Pearce JA, Hawkesworth CJ, Colley H, Edwards CMH, et al. (1997) Geochemical variations in Vanuatu Arc lavas: the role of subducted material and a variable mantle wedge composition. Journal of Petrology 38: 1331–1358.
  60. 60. Kirchman JJ, Franklin JD (2007) Comparative phylogeography and genetic structure of Vanuatu birds: Control region variation in a rail, a dove, and a passerine. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43: 14–23.
  61. 61. Heads M (2005) Dating nodes on molecular phylogenies: a critique of molecular biogeography. Cladistics 21: 62–78.
  62. 62. Hall R (1997) Cenozoic tectonics of SE Asia and Australasia. In: Howes JVC, Noble RA, editors. Petroleum Systems of SE Asia and Australasia. Jakarta: Indonesian Petroleum Association. pp. 47–62.
  63. 63. Honza E, Fujioka K (2004) Formation of arcs and backarc basins inferred from the tectonic evolution of Southeast Asia since the Late Cretaceous. Tectonophysics 384: 23–53.
  64. 64. Quarles van Ufford A, Cloos M (2005) Cenozoic tectonics of New Guinea. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 89: 119–140.
  65. 65. Petterson MG, Babbs T, Neal CR, Mahoney JJ, Saunders AD, et al. (1999) Geological–tectonic framework of Solomon Islands, SW Pacific: crustal accretion and growth within an intra-oceanic setting. Tectonophysics 301: 35–60.
  66. 66. Crawford AJ, Meffre S, Symonds PA (2003) 120 to 0 Ma tectonic evolution of the southwest Pacific and analogous geological evolution of the 600 to 220 Ma Tasman Fold Belt System. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 372: 383–403.
  67. 67. Compton SG, Thornton IWB, New TR, Underhill L (1988) The colonization of the Krakatau Islands by fig wasps and other Chalcids (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 322: 459–470.
  68. 68. Shanahan M, Harrison JD, Yamuna R, Koen W, Thornton IWB (2001) Colonisation of an island volcano, Long Island, Papua New Guinea, and an emergent island, Motmot, in its caldera lake. V. Figs (Ficus spp.), their dispersers and pollinators. J Biogeogr 28: 1365–1377.
  69. 69. Steadman DW (1997) The historic biogeography and community ecology of Polynesian pigeons and doves. J Biogeogr 24: 737–753.
  70. 70. McConkey KR, Meehan HJ, Drake DR (2004) Seed dispersal by Pacific Pigeons (Ducula pacifica) in Tonga, Western Polynesia. Emu 104: 369–376.
  71. 71. McConkey KR, Drake DR (2007) Indirect evidence that flying foxes track food resources among islands in a Pacific Archipelago. Biotropica 39: 436–440.
  72. 72. Utzurrum RCB, Heideman PD (1991) Differential ingestion of viable vs nonviable Ficus seeds by fruit bats. Biotropica 23: 311–312.
  73. 73. Lambert FRL (1989) Pigeons as seed predators and dispersers of figs in a Malaysian lowland forest. Ibis 131: 521–527.
  74. 74. Shilton LA, Altringham JD, Compton SG, Whittaker RJ (1999) Old World fruit bats can be long-distance seed dispersers through extended retention of viable seeds in the gut. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 266: 219–223.
  75. 75. Harrison RD (2005) Figs and the diversity of tropical rainforests. Bioscience 55: 1053–1064.
  76. 76. Lewington A, Parker E (1999) Fig: Sacred tree of the Old World. Ancient Trees: Trees that Live for 1000 Years. In: Lewington A, Parker E, editors. London: Collins and Brown. pp. 161–165.
  77. 77. Kjellberg F, Doumesche B, Bronstein JL (1988) Longevity of a fig wasp (Blastophaga psenes). Proc Kon Ned Akad v Wetensch 91: 117–122.
  78. 78. Dunn DW, Yu DW, Ridley J, Cook JM (2008) Longevity, early emergence and body size in a pollinating fig wasp – implications for stability in a fig–pollinator mutualism. J Anim Ecol 77: 927–935.
  79. 79. Compton SG, Ellwood MDF, Davis AJ, Welch K (2000) The flight heights of chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) in a lowland bornean rain forest: Fig wasps are the high fliers. Biotropica 32: 515–522.
  80. 80. Harrison RG, Rasplus JY (2006) Dispersal of fig pollinators in Asian tropical rain forests. J Trop Ecol 22: 631–639.
  81. 81. Ahmed S, Compton SG, Butlin RK, Gilmartin PM (2009) Wind-borne insects mediate directional pollen transfer between desert fig trees 160 kilometers apart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 20342–20347.
  82. 82. Pemberton CE (1934) Fig wasps established on Kauai. Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc 8: 379.
  83. 83. Kumagai T, Kuraji K, Noguchi H, Tanaka Y, Tanaka K, et al. (2001) Vertical profiles of environmental factors within tropical rainforest, Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia. J For Res 6: 257–264.
  84. 84. Waters JM, Craw D (2006) Goodbye Gondwana? New Zealand biogeography, geology, and the problem of circularity. Syst Biol 55: 351–356.
  85. 85. Bishop P (1995) Drainage rearrangement by river capture, beheading and diversion. Prog Phys Geog 19: 449–473.
  86. 86. Kawakita A, Kato M (2009) Repeated independent evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the Phyllantheae-Epicephala association. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 276: 417–426.
  87. 87. Kawakita A, Kato M (2004) Evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in New Caledonian Phyllanthus (Euphorbiaceae). Am J Bot 91: 410–415.
  88. 88. Kreft H, Jetz W (2010) A framework for delineating biogeographical regions based on species distributions. J Biogeogr 37: 2029–2053.