Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Analysis of the BarA/UvrY Two-Component System in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

  • Lucas Binnenkade ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lucas Binnenkade, Jürgen Lassak

    Affiliation Department of Ecophysiology, Max-Planck-Institut für Terrestrische Mikrobiologie, Marburg, Germany

  • Jürgen Lassak ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lucas Binnenkade, Jürgen Lassak

    Current address: Department Biologie I, Microbiology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Martinsried, Germany

    Affiliation Department of Ecophysiology, Max-Planck-Institut für Terrestrische Mikrobiologie, Marburg, Germany

  • Kai M. Thormann

    Affiliation Department of Ecophysiology, Max-Planck-Institut für Terrestrische Mikrobiologie, Marburg, Germany

Analysis of the BarA/UvrY Two-Component System in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

  • Lucas Binnenkade, 
  • Jürgen Lassak, 
  • Kai M. Thormann


The BarA/UvrY two-component system is well conserved in species of the γ-proteobacteria and regulates numerous processes predominantly by controlling the expression of a subset of noncoding small RNAs. In this study, we identified and characterized the BarA/UvrY two-component system in the gammaproteobacterium Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Functional interaction of sensor kinase BarA and the cognate response regulator UvrY was indicated by in vitro phosphotransfer studies. The expression of two predicted small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), CsrB1 and CsrB2, was dependent on UvrY. Transcriptomic analysis by microarrays revealed that UvrY is a global regulator and directly or indirectly affects transcript levels of more than 200 genes in S. oneidensis. Among these are genes encoding key enzymes of central carbon metabolism such as ackA, aceAB, and pflAB. As predicted of a signal transduction pathway that controls aspects of central metabolism, mutants lacking UvrY reach a significantly higher OD than the wild type during aerobic growth on N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) while under anaerobic conditions the mutant grew more slowly. A shorter lag phase occurred with lactate as carbon source. In contrast, significant growth phenotypes were absent in complex medium. Based on these studies we hypothesize that, in S. oneidensis MR-1, the global BarA/UvrY/Csr regulatory pathway is involved in central carbon metabolism processes.


The genus Shewanella belongs to the γ-proteobacteria and is characterized by a remarkable respiratory diversity. An enormous range of alternative terminal electron acceptors can be used in the absence of oxygen, including nitrogen- and sulfur-containing compounds and soluble or insoluble metal oxides such as Fe(III) and Mn(III/IV) [1], [2]. This respiratory flexibility is thought to enable species of the genus to thrive in redox-stratified environments [3]. Shewanella species have been isolated from a wide range of different habitats, and members of this genus have been implicated in diverse roles such as causative agents of food spoilage, opportunistic pathogens or, on the other hand, as potential agents in bioremediation or microbial fuel cells [4], [5], [6], [7]. However, to fully capitalize on the biotechnological potential of Shewanella, it is necessary to understand how members of this genus respond to changing environmental conditions. Accordingly, a number of studies have addressed regulatory systems underlying metabolic and respiratory processes in this genus, in particular that of the species S. oneidensis MR-1.

Key regulatory systems that have been characterized in other species of the γ-proteobacteria, such as the enteric bacteria, can be readily identified in Shewanella. However, despite a high degree of conservation at the amino acid level in the regulatory components, the output was demonstrated to be remarkably different from systems previously described in other bacteria. In Escherichia coli, FNR and the Arc two-component system are major regulators in the adaptation of the metabolism to changing oxygen levels [8], [9], [10]. In S. oneidensis MR-1, the corresponding orthologous systems, EtrA and ArcS/HptA/ArcA, only have a minor role in that process [11], [12], [13], and the corresponding regulons differ significantly between S. oneidensis MR-1 and E. coli [12], [13], [14], [15]. Interestingly, the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) is thought to mainly regulate the metabolic adaptation during the shift to anaerobic conditions in Shewanella in response to cAMP levels [16], [17]. In E. coli, the cAMP/CRP regulation cascade has become the paradigm system for catabolite repression in Gram-negative bacteria [18].

Another global regulating unit that is well conserved among γ-proteobacteria is the BarA/UvrY (E. coli) or GacS/GacA (Pseudomonas) two-component system [19]. BarA/GacS is a membrane-located sensor kinase that autophosphorylates upon perception of a signal and transfers a phosphoryl group to the cognate response regulator UvrY/GacA. Intermediates of the Krebs cycle or acetate and formate have been demonstrated to stimulate the regulating cascade in P. fluorescens and E. coli, respectively. However, it remains to be shown if these compounds are the direct signal [20], [21]. Phosphorylation of the response regulator is thought to result in dimerization and binding to the corresponding target promoter region [22], [23], [24]. Notably, BarA/UvrY (GacS/GacA) has been demonstrated to act predominantly, or even exclusively [25], via control of expression of several small RNA molecules (Csr or Rsm). Upon expression, these sRNAs effectively bind and thereby antagonize the effect of translational regulator proteins (CsrA or RsmA/E) that often block the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of corresponding target genes. In E. coli, another protein, CsrD, is involved in the regulatory cascade by specifically targeting the regulatory RNAs for degradation by RNase E [26]. The output of the BarA/UvrY (GacS/GacA) and homologous regulatory systems is highly diverse. It controls the production of extracellular factors, such as exoenzymes or toxins, quorum sensing, motility, and diverse metabolic functions. Thus, for many bacterial species, BarA/UvrY (GacS/GacA) is critical for regulation and coordination of pathogenicity and group behaviors [19].

Genome annotation and bioinformatic analyses in S. oneidensis MR-1 indicate the presence of putative orthologs to BarA, UvrY, CsrA and the Csr sRNAs [5], [27], [28]. This strongly suggests the existence of a BarA/UvrY/Csr pathway in Shewanella. In this study, we used phosphotransfer studies to demonstrate that the S. oneidensis orthologs to BarA and UvrY constitute a two-component system and transcriptomic studies to identify the UvrY regulon. We further provide evidence that at least two putative sRNAs are regulated by UvrY and BarA, and finally that the pathway regulates carbon metabolism in Shewanella.


Identification of a BarA/UvrY two-component system in S. oneidensis MR-1

To identify potential orthologs to the E. coli BarA/UvrY or the Pseudomonas GacS/GacA systems in S. oneidensis MR-1, we performed a bioinformatic analysis on the genetic data available. Based on homology, SO_3457 and SO_1860 emerged as the most likely candidates. SO_3457, annotated as hybrid histidine kinase, is 2790 bp in length and encodes a protein of 929 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 103 kDa. At the amino acid level, SO_3457 shares 44% identity and 64% similarity to BarA of E. coli. SO_3457 is predicted to have two N-terminal transmembrane domains followed by a cytoplasmic HAMP domain, a histidine kinase A domain, an ATPase domain, a receiver domain, and a C-terminal histidine phosphotransfer domain (Fig. 1). This domain architecture equals that of BarA/GacS sensor kinases identified in other species. SO_3457 is likely transcribed in an operon with the downstream gene SO_3458, predicted to encode a conserved hypothetical protein of 199 amino acids.

Figure 1. Domain organization of S. oneidensis MR-1 BarA (SO_3457; upper panel) and UvrY (SO_1860, lower panel).

White vertical bars mark the positions of transmembrane domains. HAMP, HAMP signal transduction domain; HisKa, histidine kinase dimerization domain; HATPase, histidine kinase ATPase domain; Rec, receiver domain; Hpt, histidine-containing phosphotransfer domain; HTH, helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif.

SO_1860 is 645 bp in length, encoding a protein of 214 amino acids annotated as a response regulator with an N-terminal receiver and a C-terminal helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain. At the amino acid level, SO_1860 shares 70% identity and 82% similarity to UvrY of E. coli. SO_1860 is likely to be the first gene in an operon with the downstream genes SO_1861 and SO_1862, predicted to encode a subunit of an exinuclease and a phosphatidylglycerophosphate synthetase, respectively. This gene order is also present for uvrY in E. coli and for gacA in Pseudomonas species. Notably, orthologs to both sensor kinase SO_3457 and response regulator SO_1860 are present in all Shewanella species sequenced so far (Table S1).

While UvrY is highly conserved between S. oneidensis MR-1 and E. coli and resides in similar genetic context, the putative BarA is less well conserved. Also the genetic context in both species is different. We therefore determined whether the two components identified in S. oneidensis MR-1 in fact constitute a cognate sensor histidine kinase/response regulator system. To this end, we conducted in vitro phosphotransfer studies on purified proteins to further determine whether functional interactions occur between BarA and UvrY [23]. The cytoplasmic region of BarA (aa 181–929) was purified by using a recombinant N-terminal His tag fusion and UvrY by using a recombinant N-terminal GST fusion. We tested the activity of the purified sensor kinase by incubation with [γ-32P]ATP and subsequent SDS-PAGE separation (Fig. 2; Fig. S1). BarA was readily phosphorylated, indicating autophosphorylation activity of the kinase region. In contrast, GST-UvrY was not phosphorylated upon incubation with [γ-32P]ATP. We also tested whether GST-UvrY can be phosphorylated using [γ-32P]-acetyl phosphate, however no phosphorylation occurred (data not shown). Incubation of BarA and GST-UvrY together in the presence of [γ-32P]ATP resulted in significant phosphotransfer to GST-UvrY. No phosphotransfer occurred when a GST-UvrY variant was used in which the predicted site of phosphorylation was substituted [GST-UvrY(D54N)], indicating specific phosphorylation at the predicted aspartic acid residue. Based on the results of these in vitro studies, we concluded that SO_3457/BarA acts as a sensor kinase for SO_1860/UvrY in S. oneidensis MR-1.

Figure 2. In vitro interaction of BarA and UvrY.

A) Autoradiographic analysis of BarA autophosphorylation. B) Autoradiographic analysis of phosphotransfer between BarA(181–929) and UvrY. Purified BarA181–929, UvrY, or UvrY(D54N) were added to the reactions as indicated and incubated for 60 s.

Identification of sRNAs CsrB1 and CsrB2

If SO_3457 and SO_1860 constitute the Shewanella BarA/UvrY pathway, then it should regulate the expression of Csr/RsmA sRNAs like other BarA/UvrY (or GacS/GacA) pathways [25], [29], [30], [31]. These sRNAs, in turn, antagonize the activity of the mRNA-binding regulator CsrA(RsmA). A CsrA ortholog, SO_3426, has already been annotated in S. oneidensis MR-1 due to its striking conservation levels (93% identity to E. coli CsrA). The presence of two csrB genes, csrB1 (420 bp) and csrB2 (421 bp), encoding putative corresponding regulatory sRNAs, has been predicted previously in the intergenic regions between SO_1615/SO_1616 and SO_1616/SO_1617, separated by SO_1616 encoding a transposase (Fig. 3) [28]. The prediction was based on numerous CsrA-binding AGGA/ARGGA motifs mainly occurring in single-stranded regions of the sRNA's secondary structure (Fig. S2). Furthermore, a putative UvrY/GacA-binding box (TGTAAGN6CTTACA) [32], [33], [34] was identified upstream of the putative csrB1 and csrB2 genes [28].

Figure 3. Analysis of the predicted sRNAs CsrB1 and CsrB2.

A) Northern analysis of csrB1 and csrB2 transcripts. 15 µg total RNA isolated from S. oneidensis MR-1 LB cultures at late exponential growth phase were separated on a denaturing agarose gel. As a positive control, an unlabeled PCR product was used as s corresponding probe for csrB1 or csrB2 (DNA control). B) Genetic organization of the S. oneidensis MR-1 csrB locus. The predicted csrB1 and csrB2 genes are displayed in black, the surrounding genes in white. The csrB1 and csrB2 genes are separated by SO_1616, encoding a transposase. White vertical bars indicate the positions of predicted UvrY-binding boxes, black arrows putative transcripts. C) Putative UvrY-binding boxes upstream of csrB1 and csrB2.

To determine if the two hypothetical sRNA-encoding genes csrB1 and csrB2 are transcribed and to determine the corresponding transcript length, we performed Northern blot analysis on total RNA using probes complementary to the corresponding gene. Total RNA was prepared from cells at late exponential phase grown in complex media. With either probe, distinct signals were observed (Fig. 3), strongly indicating expression of both predicted sRNAs. The major transcript of csrB1 had a size of approximately 450 bp, nicely corresponding to the predicted size of 420 bp. In contrast, the transcript of csrB2 occurs evenly in at least three different sizes at approximately 700, 600, and 450 bp. The transcript sizes exclude the occurrence of a large transcript including the transposase gene SO_1616 with a predicted size of 1203 bp and indicate that both sRNAs are transcribed separately. To determine whether the rather large transcript of csrB2 is initiated from the transposase gene, we performed RT-PCR using primers bracketing the gap between SO_1616 and csrB2. No product was obtained (data not shown), indicating that no transcription of csrB2 occurs from SO_1616.

Putative CsrB1 and CsrB2 are regulated by BarA/UvrY

To determine if csrB1 is transcribed at lower levels than csrB2, as suggested by Northern analysis, we performed q-RT-PCR using total RNA that was prepared from cells at different growth phases during aerobic growth in complex medium (Fig. 4). In wild-type cells, transcript levels of csrB1 were significantly lower than those of csrB2 (by a factor of 3–10), as was already indicated by the Northern analysis. The expression pattern of csrB2 displayed only minor changes throughout growth while the csrB1 transcription level increased during late exponential/early stationary phase. To determine whether csrB1 and csrB2 are regulated by the potential BarA/UvrY two-component system, we constructed in-frame deletions in uvrY (ΔuvrY), barA (ΔbarA), and in both (ΔbarAΔuvrY). Re-integration of the deleted gene section resulted in the wild-type phenotype, indicating that the observed mutant phenotypes were due to the deletion of the targeted genes (data not shown). The mutant and wild-type strains grew equally well in complex LB medium. In all growth phases examined, the expression levels of both csrB1 and csrB2 were drastically decreased by a factor of >100 to low levels in all mutants strains compared to those of the wild type (Fig. 4B). However, differences in csrB1 levels depending on the growth phase still occurred (data not shown). This regulation pattern strongly indicates that csrB1 and csrB2 are controlled by both BarA and UvrY. Thus, taken together with the phosphotransfer studies, we concluded that BarA is the cognate sensor kinase for UvrY.

Figure 4. Analysis of csrB1 and csrB2 expression.

A) Growth phase-dependent csrB expression in complex medium. Total RNA was prepared from cells at the indicated time points and used to calculate the transcript copy number by q-RT-PCR. The error bars display the standard deviation. B) Decrease in expression of csrB1 and csrB2 in uvrY and barA mutants. Total RNA was prepared from cells of the appropriate mutant strain at late exponential phase, and the mRNA levels of csrB1 and csrB2 were quantified by q-RT-PCR. The error bars display the standard deviation.

A third putative sRNA of S. oneidensis MR-1, CsrC, was predicted to be encoded between mutM and SO_4727. However, this region contains only four conserved AGGA/ARGGA motifs that are typical for sRNAs of the Csr/Rsm family [28], [35]. To determine whether transcription occurs from the predicted gene, q-RT-PCR was also performed using primers complementary to the corresponding gene region. Significant transcription of putative csrC was observed (data not shown). However, in contrast to csrB1 and csrB2, the transcription level of the predicted csrC sRNA was not affected by the absence of BarA and/or UvrY (data not shown) which was inconsistent with a role in a BarA/UvrY regulatory system. Based on these results we concluded that at least two predicted sRNAs, CsrB1 and CsrB2, are likely components of a BarA/UvrY/Csr regulatory cascade in S. oneidensis MR-1.

The regulon of UvrY in S. oneidensis MR-1

BarA/UvrY and orthologous systems have been demonstrated to represent global regulatory systems in γ-proteobacteria [19]. To elucidate the potential role of this system in Shewanella, we determined the impact of a uvrY deletion on the transcriptome of S. oneidensis MR-1 by microarray analysis. Total RNA was prepared from cells of the wild type and the ΔuvrY strain grown aerobically in LB medium to early stationary phase (OD600 of 4.0) and used for transcriptomic analysis by microarrays. The expression data obtained from microarray analysis was subsequently confirmed by q-RT-PCR on 5 genes displaying different levels of regulation (r2 = 0.949) (Fig. S3). According to the statistical analysis (P<0.05), 208 genes had significantly different transcriptional levels (log2≥1). Among these 208 genes, 80 genes were significantly up-regulated (listed in Table S2) and 128 genes were significantly down-regulated (listed in Table S3). About half of these regulated genes (103) encode proteins of unknown function and are particularly overrepresented among those upregulated in ΔuvrY. Other major functional groups of differently regulated genes encode proteins that are predicted to be involved in amino acid and carbohydrate transport and metabolism as well as energy production and conversion. Among the latter is, for example, AckA which is required for substrate level phosphorylation under anaerobic conditions in S. oneidensis MR-1 [36]. Other key enzymes of central carbon metabolism positively regulated by UvrY are AceA/AceB, instrumental for the glyoxalate cycle, and PflA and PflB, involved in the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA and formate. A large gene cluster encoding numerous glycosyl transferases (SO_4193 – SO_3171) is downregulated in the ΔuvrY mutant, indicating positive control of this putative operon by BarA/UvrY. The proteins encoded by this cluster are thought to be involved in cell envelope synthesis or exopolysaccharide production [37]. Further functional groups comprise gene products that function in signal transduction (regulators and enzymes involved in production and turnover of secondary messenger molecules), however, none of these have been characterized in detail.

UvrY mutants have distinct growth phenotypes

A loss of BarA/UvrY and homologous regulation systems has not been linked to distinct growth phenotypes so far. In some species, mutants in BarA/UvrY have a temporary growth advantage and are dominant in long-term survival [38], [39], [40]. However, the occurrence of ackA, aceAB, and pflAB among the genes under positive control of UvrY in S. oneidensis MR-1 suggested a role of the BarA/UvrY two-component system in regulation of the central carbon metabolism in S. oneidensis MR-1. Therefore, we compared growth of a ΔuvrY mutant to that of the wild type under aerobic and anaerobic conditions with different carbon sources: complex LB medium and 4M mineral medium with either N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) or lactate as carbon source. In S. oneidensis MR-1, which is unable to grow on glucose, the glycolytic carbon source NAG is converted via the Entner-Doudoroff pathway while the gluconeogenic lactate enters the central metabolism at the stage of pyruvate [41], [42]. In complex LB media, no growth phenotype occurred under aerobic and anaerobic conditions (Fig. 5A,D). However, when the strains were grown in mineral medium with NAG as carbon source, the ΔuvrY mutants grew faster than the wild type (186±5.8 min vs. 233±8.8 min doubling time) and reached a significant higher OD600 (3.5±0.1 vs. 1.96±0.1). Notably, under anaerobic conditions with fumarate as terminal electron acceptor, the opposite effect was observed. The ΔuvrY mutants grew more slowly (1140±93 min vs. 1036±80 min) and reached a lower OD600 (0.18±0.03 vs. 0.25±0.01). With lactate as the carbon source, both strains grew at a similar rate, however, the ΔuvrY mutant entered the exponential growth phase earlier under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The OD600 reached by both strains was similar (1.9±0.4 vs. 1.67±0.27 under aerobic conditions; 0.23±0.01 vs. 0.25±0.01 under anaerobic conditions). To determine whether the increase in optical density could be attributed to cell numbers, we performed growth experiments with 1∶1 mixtures of wild-type and ΔuvrY mutants, in which one of two strains was constitutively expressing gfp. Cells were then enumerated by fluorescent microscopy at time points at which significant differences in OD were determined in single species cultures. An approximate 3∶2 ratio of ΔuvrY-mutant to wild-type cells occurred after 48 hours of aerobic growth with NAG (57.7±7.1% to 42.3±7.1%) and 24 hours with lactate (59.0±5.5% to 41±5.5%) as carbon source (Fig. S4B). Microscopic analysis did not reveal any significant differences with respect to cell morphologies, strongly indicating that the difference in optical density is at least in part due to the number rather than size or shape of the cells. A growth advantage of the ΔuvrY mutant over the wild type also occurred with acetate under aerobic conditions (data not shown). These growth characteristics suggested that BarA/UvrY might be involved in regulation of metabolism of both glycolytic or gluconeogenic carbon sources. To further determine whether this regulation is mediated through the sRNAs csrB1 and csrB2, we performed aerobic growth experiments with NAG or lactate using a ΔcsrB1ΔcsrB2 mutant. The growth characteristics of the ΔcsrB1ΔcsrB2 mutant equaled those of ΔuvrY mutant (Fig. S4A), indicating the existence of a BarA/UvrY/Csr regulatory pathway in Shewanella.

Figure 5. Aerobic and anaerobic growth of S. oneidensis wild type and ΔuvrY mutant in different media.

The upper panel (A–C) displays growth under aerobic conditions, the lower panel (D–F) under anaerobic conditions. The corresponding electron donors and acceptors are indicated. Growth of the wild type is displayed in black, that of ΔuvrY in grey. In order to better highlight the differences in growth behavior, growth was plotted at a linear scale. The error bars display the standard deviation. NAG, N-acetylglucosamine.

Activity of the GacA/UvrY system during growth on different carbon sources

The observed growth phenotypes in S. oneidensis MR-1 ΔuvrY mutants suggested that BarA/UvrY activity and expression of csrB1 and csrB2 depends on the carbon source. To determine the expression levels of the two sRNAs we performed q-RT-PCR on total RNA that was prepared during early and late exponential growth phase of wild-type cells grown in LB and 4M mineral medium with NAG or lactate as carbon source (Fig. 6). Under all conditions, expression of csrB2 exceeded that of csrB1 by a factor of about 10. Compared to growth in LB medium, the expression levels of both sRNAs was increased by a factor of 3 to 4 during growth in mineral medium, as has been recently observed in E. coli [43]. During late exponential phase the expression levels of the sRNAs increased with both lactate (1.3-fold) and NAG (2-fold) as carbon sources. As expected, in a ΔuvrY mutant expression of csrB1 and csrB2 dropped to low levels under all conditions (data not shown). Thus, in S. oneidensis MR-1, activity of the BarA/UvrY two-component system is directly or indirectly dependent on the carbon source and might be controlled by concentrations of intermediates or end products of central metabolism.

Figure 6. Expression levels of csrB1 and csrB2 system during growth with different carbon sources.

Total RNA was prepared from cells growing in different media at early and late exponential phase as indicated below. The total RNA was then used to calculate the number of csrB1 and csrB2 transcripts by q-RT-PCR. NAG, N-acetylglucosamine.


In this study, we have provided evidence that S. oneidensis MR-1 possesses a BarA/UvrY/Csr regulatory pathway. The corresponding Shewanella orthologs were identified by bioinformatic approaches, and we applied in vitro phosphotransfer studies to determine functional interactions between sensor kinase SO_3457 (now BarA) and and response regulator (now UvrY). We demonstrated that, under in vitro conditions, BarA readily autophosphorylates and transfers the phosporyl group to UvrY. As expected, no phosphotransfer was observed when the predicted phosphorylation site, aspartate residue 54, was substituted. However, under these conditions, a lower level of phosphorylated BarA occurred. Since the protein levels were not affected, this indicates a loss of the phosphate from BarA and suggests that in the presence of the mutated response regulator UvrY(D54N) the phosphorylation of the sensor kinase might be destabilized. To our knowledge, this has not been observed before. In concert with genetic studies, the in vitro phosphotransfer studies showed that SO_3457/BarA is the cognate sensor kinase for SO_1860/UvrY. We also demonstrated that in S. oneidensis MR-1, UvrY positively regulates at least two sRNAs, csrB1 and csrB2. Also the corresponding CsrA ortholog can be readily identified in Shewanella, so that all major components of the regulatory pathway are present.

BarA/UvrY/Csr and orthologous pathways have been implicated in regulating global carbon metabolism, secondary metabolism, exoproduct formation, and pathogenicity in numerous species of the γ-proteobacteria [19]. To determine the corresponding regulon in Shewanella, we performed global transcriptomic analysis on a uvrY mutant. Recently, the transcriptome of a Pseudomonas fluorescens PF-5 ΔgacA mutant was analyzed under similar conditions [44]. 635 genes had different transcript levels in the mutant at late exponential growth phase. Thus, more than 10% of the annotated genes are under direct or indirect control of the UvrY ortholog GacA in this species. The most pronounced changes occurred in the regulation of genes involved in iron acquisition and homeostasis, TonB-signaling and ECF sigma factors, and secondary metabolism and exoenzymes. In P. aeruginosa, the expression of about 240 genes was affected in the absence of GacA or the corresponding sRNAs RsmYZ [25]. The study revealed that, in this species, genes encoding virulence factors, secretion systems and type IV pili are controlled by GacS/GacA/Rsm, the system orthologous to BarA/UvrY/Csr. These findings underline the crucial role of this regulatory cascade in secondary metabolism and pathogenicity in Pseudomonas. A similar study was carried out on a uvrY mutant of the insect pathogen Photorhabdus luminescens [45]. In this species, UvrY directly and indirectly controls the expression of more than 500 genes involved in flagellum synthesis, synthesis of the quorum-sensing autoinducer AI-2, iron transport, resistance, antibiotic synthesis, degradation, and virulence. It is thought that UvrY plays in important role in adaptation of P. luminescens inside the insect as a uvrY mutant is negatively affected in killing of insect cells and exhibits a reduced growth on insect cells cultures [45]. In contrast to Pseudomonads or Photorhabdus luminescens, a rather small set of genes is regulated by UvrY in the plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa, comprising just 27 genes [46]. However, several among these genes encode important factors required to elicit disease symptoms on grapevines.

Thus, with the exception of two putative toxin transport systems (SOA_0047 – SOA_0050; SO_4318) that are potential virulence factors, UvrY controls a different set of genes in the S. oneidensis MR-1 compared to those of pathogenic species. Our transcriptome analysis revealed that among the genes controlled by this pathway, some encode key enzymes of global carbon metabolism. Similar regulation patterns to those observed in S. oneidensis MR-1 have been reported for non-pathogenic strains of E. coli, where genes involved in gluconeogenesis, glycolysis, pentose-phosphate and glyoxylate shunts, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and the biosynthesis of glycogen and the exopolysaccharide poly-β-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine are regulated by the BarA/UvrY/Csr system [47], [48], [49], [50], [51]. In addition, BarA/UvrY mediates efficient switching between glycolytic and gluconeogenic carbon sources in E. coli [40]. Notably, few genes display striking changes in transcription levels in S. oneidensis MR-1 uvrY mutants. It has been hypothesized that, as opposed to pathogens such as Pseudomonas, Photorhabdus, or Xyllela species, in non-pathogenic E. coli strains the BarA/UvrY/Csr system rather has a modulating than a more decisive regulating role [19]. Our findings for S. oneidensis MR-1 support this hypothesis.

BarA/UvrY/Csr and orthologous systems have previously been demonstrated to regulate primary and secondary metabolism. However, our present study is, to our knowledge, the first report that directly links the BarA/UvrY two-component system to pronounced growth phenotypes in dependence of the carbon source. Thus, our present study implicates that, in S. oneidensis MR-1, the impact of BarA/UvrY on the control of central carbon fluxes is more pronounced than in other species examined so far. If BarA/UvrY plays a similar role in regulating secondary metabolism as demonstrated in other species such as E. coli or Pseudomonas sp., it is conceivable that, in S. oneidensis MR-1, BarA/UvrY controls the conversion of glycolytic NAG into storage compounds or cell material, such as exopolysaccharides. Accordingly, our transcriptomic analysis has identified several glycosyl transferases that are under positive control of UvrY in S. oneidensis MR-1. In addition, this species possess genes that are annotated to be involved in glycogen metabolism [5], [52]. Thus, we hypothesized that, during growth on NAG, wild-type cells might produce glycogen or exopolysaccharides while the uvrY mutant might use this carbon source exclusively for growth. Staining by iodine, congo red, or calcofluor white did not identify a difference between the wild type and a uvrY mutant (data not shown). Thus, potential exopolysaccharides and/or storage compounds are yet to be identified. Under anaerobic conditions, S. oneidensis MR-1 oxidizes N-acetylglucosamine and lactate to carbon dioxide and acetate as the main product, and energy conservation primarily occurs by substrate-level phosphorylation [1], [36], [53], [54], [55]. Our transcriptomic studies indicate that a key enzyme in this process, the acetate kinase AckA [36], is regulated by UvrY. It remains to be demonstrated whether growth phenotypes under anaerobic conditions may be attributed to differences in expression levels of ackA or genes encoding other enzymes of carbon metabolism.

The direct signal perceived by BarA/UvrY/Csr and orthologous pathways is still obscure. Expression of the pathways' sRNAs was observed to increase with cell density in a number of species in complex media [33], [56], [57], [58]. However, only csrB1 was observed to display changing expression levels depending of the growth phase in complex medium, while csrB2 is constantly expressed at a similar level independent of the growth phase. This indicates that crsB1 and csrB2 may be regulated differently in S. oneidensis MR-1. In contrast to other Shewanella species, such as S. putrefaciens CN-32, the two sRNAs are not adjacent but are separated by a transposase which might influence their expression. For Pseudomonas species it was demonstrated recently that other regulators, such as PsrA, IHF, MvaT, and MvaU, influence the expression in concert with the UvrY homolog GacA [24], [25]. In Erwinia carotovora, rsmB(csrB) expression is under negative control of RsmC, KdgR, and hexR [59], [60], [61]. Thus, it is conceivable that the expression of csrB1 and csrB2 is under direct control of other regulators in S. oneidensis MR-1 as well. In addition, studies on P. fluorescens revealed a strong positive correlation between expression of the Rsm sRNAs and pools of the TCA cycle intermediates 2-oxoglutarate, succinate, and fumarate [20]. If similar stimuli are responsible for the activation of the Shewanella BarA/UvrY system, the expression levels of csrB1 and csrB2 would be expected to be significantly different during growth with glycolytic NAG and gluconeogenetic lactate as carbon sources. However, this was not observed. Recent studies on the corresponding E. coli system suggested that formate and acetate primarily act as stimuli [21], and these compounds are also candidates to activate the BarA/UvrY system in Shewanella.

Notably, it is yet unclear how species of the genus Shewanella regulate the selection of carbon sources and carbon flux. Based on this study, it may be hypothesized that, in Shewanella, BarA/UvrY has adopted this role. All major components of the two-component system and downstream regulatory units can be readily identified in other Shewanella species. Thus, this study provides the basis for numerous future studies. Further mutant characterization, also including CsrA and the putative sRNAs CsrB1 and CsrB2, combined with carbon flux analysis and determination of enzyme activities will help to better understand the impact of the BarA/UvrY/Csr regulatory system on the global metabolism of S. oneidensis MR-1 and other Shewanella species.

Materials and Methods

Growth conditions and media

Bacterial strains used in this study are summarized in Table 1. Escherichia coli strains were routinely grown in LB medium at 37°C. For strain WM3064, 2,6-diamino-pimelic acid (DAP) was added to the medium to a final concentration of 300 µM. Shewanella oneidensis strains were routinely grown at 30°C in LB. For solidification, agar was added to a final concentration of 1.5% (w/v). Growth experiments were carried out in 4M mineral medium [62] supplemented with 40 mM N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) or 40 mM lactate as carbon sources with orbital shaking and repeated at least three independent times. Anaerobic growth was assayed in LB or in 4M mineral medium with 40 mM of the appropriate carbon source. 40 mM fumarate was added as terminal electron acceptor. To remove oxygen from media, the culture tubes were stoppered, sealed, and flushed with nitrogen gas for several minutes with periodic shaking [63]. Precultures were grown to late exponential phase in 20 ml of the corresponding media (LB, 4M-NAG or 4M-lactate). Appropriate volumes of the precultures were used for inoculation of the main cultures (50 ml) to an OD600 of 0.05. Where necessary, media were supplemented with 50 µg·ml−1 kanamycin sulfate, 10 µg·ml−1 chloramphenicol, and/or 100 µg·ml−1 ampicillin sodium salt.

To determine cell numbers during growth of ΔuvrY cells compared to those of the wild type, mixed cultures containing 1∶1 ratios of wild type and mutant were used. Precultures of the wild type and ΔuvrY mutant were grown to late exponential phase in 4M-medium containing 40 mM NAG or 40 mM lactate. To distinguish the cell type, one of the strains in the cultures was constitutively expressing gfp. To exclude that gfp expression affects growth rate and cell number, we determined the cell numbers from two different mixtures (wt-gfp/ΔuvrY or wt/ΔuvrY-gfp). The ratio of the corresponding strains was determined in the beginning to ensure a 1∶1 ratio and at appropriate time points by fluorescent microscopy using a using an upright Zeiss Image MI (Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with Cascade 1 K camera (Visitron Systems, Puchheim, Germany) and a Zeiss Plan Apochromat 100x/1.4 objective. At least 180 cells per slide were counted.

Vector and strain constructions

DNA manipulations were performed according to standard protocols [64], [65] or following the manufacturers' instructions. Kits for the isolation of chromosomal DNA, the isolation of plasmids and the purification of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were purchased from HISS Diagnostics GmbH (Freiburg, Germany). Enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs (Frankfurt, Germany) and Fermentas (St Leon-Rot, Germany). Strains and plasmids used in this study are summarized in Table 1. Sequencing of DNA was carried out at Eurofins MWG GmbH, Ebersberg, Germany.

Markerless in-frame deletion mutants of S. oneidensis MR-1 were constructed essentially as reported earlier [13] using the suicide vector pNPTS-138-R6KT and appropriate primer pairs (Table S4). For confirmation of phenotypes induced by in-frame deletions, the S. oneidensis MR-1 genotype was restored by replacing the in-frame deletion by the wild-type copy of the gene following the deletion strategy.

A ΔSO_1860/ΔuvrY strain constitutively expressing gfp was constructed by using a modified Tn7 delivery system as reported earlier [66]. Briefly, the plasmid pUC18-R6KT-miniTn7T-egfp was used for tagging S. oneidensis ΔuvrY by three-parental mating from the DAP-auxotroph E. coli WM3064 and E. coli WM3064 harboring the helper plasmid pTNS2.

Genes and gene fragments to be overexpressed were amplified from template genomic DNA using appropriate primers (Tab. S1). Site-directed mutagenesis (D54N) in SO_1860/uvrY was achieved using overlap extension PCR as previously described [67]. The PCR fragment harboring barA181–929 was ligated into pBAD-HisA (Invitrogen) to result in a N-terminal His-tag fusion, uvrY and uvrY(D54N) were cloned into pGEX4T-1 (GE-Healthcare) yielding N-terminal fusions to glutathione S-transferase (GST).

RNA extraction from S. oneidensis MR-1

Cells at the appropriate growth phase were harvested by centrifugation at 4600×g for 15 min at 4°C, and the cell sediments were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Total RNA was extracted from S. oneidensis MR-1 cells using the hot phenol method [68]. Residual chromosomal DNA was removed using Turbo DNA-free™ (Applied Biosystems) following the manufacturer's instructions. The purified RNA was then used for transcriptomic profiling by microarray analysis, quantitative Real Time PCR (q-RT PCR), and Northern analysis.

Northern analysis of csrB1 and csrB2 transcripts

15 µg total RNA extracted from the S. oneidensis wild type strain at late exponential growth phase (OD600 4.0) was separated in denaturating gel electrophoresis and transferred to an Amersham Hybond™-N+ nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany). Nucleic acids were covalently bound to the membrane by UV-cross linking at 254 nm for 3 minutes. For the detection of csrB1 and csrB2 transcripts digoxygenin (DIG)-labeled DNA probes were synthesized using the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Hybridization was carried out using the DIG Nucleic Acid Detection Kit (Roche Mannheim) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Signals were detected using the CDP-Star® reagent (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and documented using an Immunoblot Imager LAS 4000 (FujiFilm, Düsseldorf, Germany).

Transcriptomic analysis

Microarray analysis was performed by febit biomed GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany) using arrays containing three 50mer probes for each annotated gene of S. oneidensis MR-1. For each strain, three independent RNA samples obtained from three independent experiments were analyzed. Array design, handling, expression profiling, and data analysis has been described in detail previously [13]. The raw data and normalized data are available under Gene Expression Omnibus under accession GSE24994. After verification of the normal distribution of the measured data, parametric t-test (unpaired, two-tailed) was carried out for each gene separately, to detect genes that show a differential expression between the compared groups. The resulting P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment [69], [70]. For significant statistical measurements, an adjusted P-value<0.05 (5%) cut-off was applied. All data obtained is MIAME compliant.


Extracted total RNA was applied as template for random-primed First Strand cDNA Synthesis using Bioscript™ (Bioline) following the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was used as template for quantitative RT-PCR (Real Time 7300 PCR Machine, Applied Biosystems) using the Sybr Green detection system (Applied Biosystems). The signals were standardized to recA, with the CT (cycle threshold) determined automatically by the Real Time 7300 PCR software (Applied Biosystems), and the total number of cycles was set to 40. Samples were assayed at least in duplicate. The efficiency of each primer pair was determined using four different concentrations of S. oneidensis MR-1 chromosomal DNA (10 ng·l−1, 1.0 ng·l−1, 0.1 ng·l−1, and 0.01 ng·l−1) as a template in quantitative PCRs.

Overproduction and purification of recombinant proteins

E. coli strains carrying the corresponding protein expression plasmids (either pBAD-HisA or pGEX4T1) were grown overnight with orbital shaking (200 rpm) in SOB medium. The cultures were then used for reinoculation of 500 ml SOB medium at an OD600 of 0.1. At an OD600 of 0.5, expression from pBAD-HisA constructs was induced by the addition of L-arabinose to a final concentration of 0.2% (w/v) and expression from pGEX4T1 constructs by the addition of isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 1 mM. Subsequently, the cells were incubated for 4 h at 37°C.

For purification of recombinant proteins, cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (PMSF), 0.5 mg/ml lysozyme) and lysed by three passages through a French Press (SLM-AMINCO/Spectronic) at 1240 bar (18,000 psi). The lysate was centrifuged at 35,000×g for 1 h at 4°C, and the supernatant was filtered (0.45 µm). The purification was performed by affinity chromatography at 4°C following the manufacturer's instructions in a batch procedure using either 1 ml Ni-NTA Superflow (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for His6-Proteins or 1 ml GST-Bind™ resin (Novagen) for GST fusion proteins. Elution fractions containing purified protein were pooled and dialyzed overnight at 4°C against TGMNKD buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mm KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol) prior to use for further assays. The total protein concentration was determined via the Bio-Rad Protein assay (Bio-Rad Labratories GmbH, Munich, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Radiolabeled in vitro autophosphorylation and phosphotransfer assays

In vitro phosphorylation BarA was carried out in TGMNKD buffer containing 0.5 mM [γ32P]ATP (14.8 GBq mmol−1; Amersham) and 10 µM of the corresponding protein in 50 µl total volume for 30 min at room temperature. Aliquots of 10 µl were quenched with 2 µl of 5× Laemmli sample buffer (0.313 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8 at 25°C), 10% SDS, 0.05% bromophenol blue and 50% glycerol) [71], [72]. Phosphotransfer reactions with purified BarA, UvrY, and UvrYD54N were performed by first autophosphorylating 10 µM BarA for 5 min as above. An aliquot was removed for an autophosphorylation control. An equivalent volume containing response regulator at equal concentration was then added to the reaction and incubated for 1 min. Both reactions were then quenched with 5× Laemmli sample buffer (kinase final concentration: 2.5 µM).

To determine autophosphorylation of UvrY by acetyl phosphate, 10 µM of the protein were incubated in TGMNKD buffer with an equivalent volume of acetyl [32P]-phosphate for 10, 30, 60, and 120 min at room temperature [72]. The reaction was quenched with 5× Laemmli sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 20% glycerol, 4% SDS, 10% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.02% bromphenol blue). Radioactive acetyl phosphate was generated by incubating the following reaction: 1.5 units of acetate kinase (Sigma), TKM buffer (2.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 6 mM potassium acetate, 1 mM MgCl2), and 10 µl of [γ-32P]ATP (14.8 GBq·mmol−1; Amersham Biosciences) in a total volume of 100 µl. The reaction was incubated for 2 h at room temperature. To remove the acetate kinase, the reaction was subjected to centrifugation in a Microcon YM-10 centrifugal filter unit (Millipore) for 1 h. The flow-through was collected and stored at 4°C.

For analysis of the autophosphorylation or the phosphotransfer reaction, 10 µl samples were loaded without prior heating on a 15% polyacrylamide gel, and separated by denaturating sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Subsequently, gels were exposed to a PhosphorImager screen overnight, and images were detected on a Typhoon Trio PhosphorImager (Amersham Biosciences, GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany). Gels were subsequently stained by Coomassie dye (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) to visualize proteins.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

in vitro interaction of BarA and UvrY. A) Autoradiographic analysis of BarA phosphorylation. Upper panel: autoradiographic image, lower panel: corresponding PAGE after Coomassie staining. B) Upper panel: Autoradiographic analysis of phosphotransfer between BarA(181–929) and UvrY. The idicated components were added to the reaction. Lower panel: corresponding PAGE after Coomassie staining.


Figure S2.

Secondary structures of putative sRNAs CsrB1 and CsrB2. The corresponding sequences as predicted by Kulkarni et al. (2006) were used for secondary structure prediction by CentroidFold (; Sato et al., 2009). The color panel displays the probability of base pairing from 0 (blue) to 1 (red). Kulkarni, P. R., X. Cui, J. W. Williams, A. M. Stevens, and R. V. Kulkarni. 2006. Prediction of CsrA-regulating small RNAs in bacteria and their experimental verification in Vibrio fischerii. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:3361–3369. Sato, K., M. Hamada, K., Asai, and T. Mituyama. 2009. CENTROIDFOLD: a web server for RNA secondary structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:W277–280.


Figure S3.

Comparison of transcriptional changes in ΔuvrY mutants as determined by microarrays and q-RT-PCR. Values of transcriptional level changes (log2) of 5 selected genes were plotted next to (A) and against each other (B). The gene identities are indicated in A.


Figure S4.

A) Growth comparison of S.oneidensis MR-1 wild type, ΔuvrY, and ΔcsrB1ΔcsrB2 mutants. Displayed is growth under aerobic conditions with N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) as carbon source (upper panel) or lactate (lower panel). The corresponding strains are indicated. In order to better highlight the differences in growth behaviour, growth was plotted at a linear scale. The error bars display the standard deviation. B) Ratio of ΔuvrY and wild-type cells grown in mixed cultures. To distinguish the two strains, one of the strains was constitutively expressing gfp.


Table S1.

Putative orthologs of BarA and UvrY in Shewanella species.


Table S2.

Significantly upregulated genes in Δ uvrY .


Table S3.

Significantly downregulated genes in Δ uvrY .



The authors would like to thank Penelope Higgs for critically reading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JL LB KMT. Performed the experiments: LB JL. Analyzed the data: JL. Wrote the paper: KMT JL LB.


  1. 1. Myers CR, Nealson KH (1988) Bacterial manganese reduction and growth with manganese oxide as the sole electron acceptor. Science 240: 1319–1321.
  2. 2. Nealson KH, Scott J (2003) Ecophysiology of the genus Shewanella. In: Dworkin M, editor. The Prokaryotes: An Evolving Electronic Resource for the Microbial Community. New York, USA: Springer-NY, LLC. pp. 1133–1151.
  3. 3. Ziemke F, Brettar I, Höfle MG (1997) Stability and diversity of the genetic structure of a Shewanella putrefaciens population in the water column of the Central Baltic. Aquat Microb Ecol 13: 63–74.
  4. 4. Hau HH, Gralnick JA (2007) Ecology and biotechnology of the genus Shewanella. Annu Rev Microbiol 61: 237–258.
  5. 5. Heidelberg JF, Paulsen IT, Nelson KE, Gaidos EJ, Nelson WC, et al. (2002) Genome sequence of the dissimilatory metal ion-reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis. Nat Biotechnol 20: 1118–1123.
  6. 6. Bretschger O, Obraztsova A, Sturm CA, Chang IS, Gorby YA, et al. (2007) Current production and metal oxide reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 wild type and mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 7003–7012.
  7. 7. Logan BE (2009) Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 375–381.
  8. 8. Green J, Crack JC, Thomson AJ, LeBrun NE (2009) Bacterial sensors of oxygen. Curr Opin Microbiol 12: 145–151.
  9. 9. Kiley PJ, Beinert H (1998) Oxygen sensing by the global regulator, FNR: the role of the iron-sulfur cluster. FEMS Microbiol Rev 22: 341–352.
  10. 10. Malpica A, Pena-Sandoval GR, Rodriguez C, Franco B, Georgellis D (2006) Signaling by the Arc two-component system provides a link between the redox state of the quinone pool and gene expression. Antioxid Redox Signal 8: 781–795.
  11. 11. Maier TM, Myers CR (2001) Isolation and characterization of a Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1 electron transport regulator etrA mutant: reassessment of the role of EtrA. J Bacteriol 183: 4918–4926.
  12. 12. Gralnick JA, Brown CT, Newman DK (2005) Anaerobic regulation by an atypical Arc system in Shewanella oneidensis. Mol Microbiol 56: 1347–1357.
  13. 13. Lassak J, Henche AL, Binnenkade L, Thormann KM (2010) ArcS, the cognate sensor kinase in an atypical Arc system of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 3263–3274.
  14. 14. Beliaev AS, Thompson DK, Fields MW, Wu L, Lies DP, et al. (2002) Microarray transcription profiling of a Shewanella oneidensis etrA mutant. J Bacteriol 184: 4612–4616.
  15. 15. Gao H, Wang X, Yang ZK, Palzkill T, Zhou J (2008) Probing regulon of ArcA in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 by integrated genomic analyses. BMC Genomics 9: 42.
  16. 16. Charania MA, Brockman KL, Zhang Y, Banerjee A, Pinchuk GE, et al. (2009) Involvement of a membrane-bound class III adenylate cyclase in regulation of anaerobic respiration in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J Bacteriol 191: 4298–4306.
  17. 17. Saffarini DA, Schultz R, Beliaev A (2003) Involvement of cyclic AMP (cAMP) and cAMP receptor protein in anaerobic respiration of Shewanella oneidensis. J Bacteriol 185: 3668–3671.
  18. 18. Fic E, Bonarek P, Gorecki A, Kedracka-Krok S, Mikolajczak J, et al. (2009) cAMP receptor protein from escherichia coli as a model of signal transduction in proteins–a review. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 17: 1–11.
  19. 19. Lapouge K, Schubert M, Allain FH, Haas D (2008) Gac/Rsm signal transduction pathway of gamma-proteobacteria: from RNA recognition to regulation of social behaviour. Mol Microbiol 67: 241–253.
  20. 20. Takeuchi K, Kiefer P, Reimmann C, Keel C, Dubuis C, et al. (2009) Small RNA-dependent expression of secondary metabolism is controlled by Krebs cycle function in Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Biol Chem 284: 34976–34985.
  21. 21. Chavez RG, Alvarez AF, Romeo T, Georgellis D (2010) The physiological stimulus for the BarA sensor kinase. J Bacteriol 192: 2009–2012.
  22. 22. Goodman AL, Merighi M, Hyodo M, Ventre I, Filloux A, et al. (2009) Direct interaction between sensor kinase proteins mediates acute and chronic disease phenotypes in a bacterial pathogen. Genes Dev 23: 249–259.
  23. 23. Pernestig AK, Melefors O, Georgellis D (2001) Identification of UvrY as the cognate response regulator for the BarA sensor kinase in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 276: 225–231.
  24. 24. Humair B, Wackwitz B, Haas D (2010) GacA-controlled activation of promoters for small RNA genes in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 1497–1506.
  25. 25. Brencic A, McFarland KA, McManus HR, Castang S, Mogno I, et al. (2009) The GacS/GacA signal transduction system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa acts exclusively through its control over the transcription of the RsmY and RsmZ regulatory small RNAs. Mol Microbiol 73: 434–445.
  26. 26. Suzuki K, Babitzke P, Kushner SR, Romeo T (2006) Identification of a novel regulatory protein (CsrD) that targets the global regulatory RNAs CsrB and CsrC for degradation by RNase E. Genes Dev 20: 2605–2617.
  27. 27. Daraselia N, Dernovoy D, Tian Y, Borodovsky M, Tatusov R, et al. (2003) Reannotation of Shewanella oneidensis genome. OMICS 7: 171–175.
  28. 28. Kulkarni PR, Cui X, Williams JW, Stevens AM, Kulkarni RV (2006) Prediction of CsrA-regulating small RNAs in bacteria and their experimental verification in Vibrio fischeri. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 3361–3369.
  29. 29. Sahr T, Bruggemann H, Jules M, Lomma M, Albert-Weissenberger C, et al. (2009) Two small ncRNAs jointly govern virulence and transmission in Legionella pneumophila. Mol Microbiol 72: 741–762.
  30. 30. Teplitski M, Al-Agely A, Ahmer BM (2006) Contribution of the SirA regulon to biofilm formation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Microbiology 152: 3411–3424.
  31. 31. Teplitski M, Goodier RI, Ahmer BM (2003) Pathways leading from BarA/SirA to motility and virulence gene expression in Salmonella. J Bacteriol 185: 7257–7265.
  32. 32. Valverde C, Heeb S, Keel C, Haas D (2003) RsmY, a small regulatory RNA, is required in concert with RsmZ for GacA-dependent expression of biocontrol traits in Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Mol Microbiol 50: 1361–1379.
  33. 33. Kay E, Dubuis C, Haas D (2005) Three small RNAs jointly ensure secondary metabolism and biocontrol in Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 17136–17141.
  34. 34. Lenz DH, Miller MB, Zhu J, Kulkarni RV, Bassler BL (2005) CsrA and three redundant small RNAs regulate quorum sensing in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 58: 1186–1202.
  35. 35. Gardner PP, Daub J, Tate JG, Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, et al. (2009) Rfam: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D136–140.
  36. 36. Hunt KA, Flynn JM, Naranjo B, Shikhare ID, Gralnick JA (2010) Substrate-level phosphorylation is the primary source of energy conservation during anaerobic respiration of Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1. J Bacteriol 192: 3345–3351.
  37. 37. Kouzuma A, Meng XY, Kimura N, Hashimoto K, Watanabe K (2010) Disruption of the putative cell surface polysaccharide biosynthesis gene SO3177 in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 enhances adhesion to electrodes and current generation in microbial fuel cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 4151–4157.
  38. 38. Bull CT, Duffy B, Voisard C, Defago G, Keel C, et al. (2001) Characterization of spontaneous gacS and gacA regulatory mutants of Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strain CHAO. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 79: 327–336.
  39. 39. Eriksson AR, Andersson RA, Pirhonen M, Palva ET (1998) Two-component regulators involved in the global control of virulence in Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11: 743–752.
  40. 40. Pernestig AK, Georgellis D, Romeo T, Suzuki K, Tomenius H, et al. (2003) The Escherichia coli BarA-UvrY two-component system is needed for efficient switching between glycolytic and gluconeogenic carbon sources. J Bacteriol 185: 843–853.
  41. 41. Pinchuk GE, Rodionov DA, Yang C, Li X, Osterman AL, et al. (2009) Genomic reconstruction of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 metabolism reveals a previously uncharacterized machinery for lactate utilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2874–2879.
  42. 42. Yang C, Rodionov DA, Li X, Laikova ON, Gelfand MS, et al. (2006) Comparative genomics and experimental characterization of N-acetylglucosamine utilization pathway of Shewanella oneidensis. J Biol Chem 281: 29872–29885.
  43. 43. Jonas K, Melefors O (2009) The Escherichia coli CsrB and CsrC small RNAs are strongly induced during growth in nutrient-poor medium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 297: 80–86.
  44. 44. Hassan KA, Johnson A, Shaffer BT, Ren Q, Kidarsa TA, et al. (2010) Inactivation of the GacA response regulator in Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5 has far-reaching transcriptomic consequences. Environ Microbiol 12: 899–915.
  45. 45. Krin E, Derzelle S, Bedard K, Adib-Conquy M, Turlin E, et al. (2008) Regulatory role of UvrY in adaptation of Photorhabdus luminescens growth inside the insect. Environ Microbiol 10: 1118–1134.
  46. 46. Shi XY, Dumenyo CK, Hernandez-Martinez R, Azad H, Cooksey DA (2009) Characterization of regulatory pathways in Xylella fastidiosa: genes and phenotypes controlled by gacA. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2275–2283.
  47. 47. Romeo T, Gong M, Liu MY, Brun-Zinkernagel AM (1993) Identification and molecular characterization of csrA, a pleiotropic gene from Escherichia coli that affects glycogen biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, cell size, and surface properties. J Bacteriol 175: 4744–4755.
  48. 48. Romeo T (1998) Global regulation by the small RNA-binding protein CsrA and the non-coding RNA molecule CsrB. Mol Microbiol 29: 1321–1330.
  49. 49. Sabnis NA, Yang H, Romeo T (1995) Pleiotropic regulation of central carbohydrate metabolism in Escherichia coli via the gene csrA. J Biol Chem 270: 29096–29104.
  50. 50. Baker CS, Morozov I, Suzuki K, Romeo T, Babitzke P (2002) CsrA regulates glycogen biosynthesis by preventing translation of glgC in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 44: 1599–1610.
  51. 51. Wang X, Dubey AK, Suzuki K, Baker CS, Babitzke P, et al. (2005) CsrA post-transcriptionally represses pgaABCD, responsible for synthesis of a biofilm polysaccharide adhesin of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 56: 1648–1663.
  52. 52. Leaphart AB, Thompson DK, Huang K, Alm E, Wan X-F, et al. (2006) Transcriptome profiling of Shewanella oneidensis gene expression following exposure to acidic and alkaline pH. J Bacteriol 188: 1633–1642.
  53. 53. Scott JH, Nealson KH (1994) A biochemical study of the intermediary carbon metabolism of Shewanella putrefaciens. J Bacteriol 176: 3408–3411.
  54. 54. Tang YJ, Hwang JS, Wemmer DE, Keasling JD (2007) Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 fluxome under various oxygen conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 718–729.
  55. 55. Tang YJ, Meadows AL, Kirby J, Keasling JD (2007) Anaerobic central metabolic pathways in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 reinterpreted in the light of isotopic metabolite labeling. J Bacteriol 189: 894–901.
  56. 56. Cui Y, Chatterjee A, Chatterjee AK (2001) Effects of the two-component system comprising GacA and GacS of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora on the production of global regulatory rsmB RNA, extracellular enzymes, and harpinEcc. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14: 516–526.
  57. 57. Weilbacher T, Suzuki K, Dubey AK, Wang X, Gudapaty S, et al. (2003) A novel sRNA component of the carbon storage regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Molecular Microbiology 48: 657–670.
  58. 58. Gudapaty S, Suzuki K, Wang X, Babitzke P, Romeo T (2001) Regulatory interactions of Csr components: the RNA binding protein CsrA activates csrB transcription in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 183: 6017–6027.
  59. 59. Cui Y, Mukherjee A, Dumenyo CK, Liu Y, Chatterjee AK (1999) rsmC of the soft-rotting bacterium Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora negatively controls extracellular enzyme and harpin(Ecc) production and virulence by modulating levels of regulatory RNA (rsmB) and RNA-binding protein (RsmA). J Bacteriol 181: 6042–6052.
  60. 60. Liu Y, Jiang G, Cui Y, Mukherjee A, Ma WL, et al. (1999) kdgREcc negatively regulates genes for pectinases, cellulase, protease, HarpinEcc, and a global RNA regulator in Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. J Bacteriol 181: 2411–2421.
  61. 61. Mukherjee A, Cui Y, Ma W, Liu Y, Chatterjee AK (2000) hexA of Erwinia carotovora ssp. carotovora strain Ecc71 negatively regulates production of RpoS and rsmB RNA, a global regulator of extracellular proteins, plant virulence and the quorum-sensing signal, N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone. Environ Microbiol 2: 203–215.
  62. 62. Thormann KM, Duttler S, Saville RM, Hyodo M, Shukla S, et al. (2006) Control of formation and cellular detachment from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms by cyclic di-GMP. J Bacteriol 188: 2681–2691.
  63. 63. Balch WE, Wolfe RS (1976) New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid (HS-CoM)-dependent growth of Methanobacterium ruminantium in a pressureized atmosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 32: 781–791.
  64. 64. Sambrook K, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press.
  65. 65. Pospiech A, Neumann B (1995) A versatile quick-prep of genomic DNA from gram-positive bacteria. Trends Genet 11: 217–218.
  66. 66. Gödeke J, Paul K, Lassak J, Thormann KM (2010) Phage-induced lysis enhances biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. ISME J 5: 613–626.
  67. 67. Aiyar A, Xiang Y, Leis J (1996) Site-directed mutagenesis using overlap extension PCR. Methods Mol Biol 57: 177–191.
  68. 68. Aiba H, Adhya S, de Crombrugghe B (1981) Evidence for two functional gal promoters in intact Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem 256: 11905–11910.
  69. 69. Hochberg Y (1988) A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75: 800–802.
  70. 70. Klipper-Aurbach Y, Wasserman M, Braunspiegel-Weintrob N, Borstein D, Peleg S, et al. (1995) Mathematical formulae for the prediction of the residual beta cell function during the first two years of disease in children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Med Hypotheses 45: 486–490.
  71. 71. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685.
  72. 72. Jagadeesan S, Mann P, Schink CW, Higgs PI (2009) A novel “four-component” two-component signal transduction mechanism regulates developmental progression in Myxococcus xanthus. J Biol Chem 284: 21435–21445.
  73. 73. Miller VL, Mekalanos JJ (1988) A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires toxR. J Bacteriol 170: 2575–2583.
  74. 74. Venkateswaran K, Moser DP, Dollhopf ME, Lies DP, Saffarini DA, et al. (1999) Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus Shewanella and description of Shewanella oneidensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 2: 705–724.
  75. 75. Choi KH, Gaynor JB, White KG, Lopez C, Bosio CM, et al. (2005) A Tn7-based broad-range bacterial cloning and expression system. Nat Methods 2: 443–448.