Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Imprint of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on Tree-Ring Widths in Northeastern Asia since 1568


We present a new tree-ring reconstruction of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) spanning 1568–2007 CE from northeast Asia. Comparison of the instrumental AMO index, an existing tree-ring based AMO reconstruction, and this new record show strongly similar annual to multidecadal patterns of variation over the last 440 years. Warm phases of the AMO are related to increases in growth of Scots pine trees and moisture availability in northeast China and central eastern Siberia. Multi-tape method (MTM) and cross-wavelet analyses indicate that robust multidecadal (∼64–128 years) variability is present throughout the new proxy record. Our results have important implications concerning the influence of North Atlantic sea surface temperatures on East Asian climate, and provide support for the possibility of an AMO signature on global multidecadal climate variability.


The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) is a mode of natural climate variability occurring in the North Atlantic Ocean. AMO has a principal expression in mean sea surface temperatures (SST) anomalies north of the equator with a period of 65–80 years and an amplitude of ∼0.4°C on a multidecadal timescale [1], [2]. The AMO is thought to be induced by Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) variations and associated ocean heat transport fluctuations [1], [3]. It exerts significant influences on global and regional climates [2], [3], such as North American and European summer rainfall regimes [4][6], African [7], [8] and northeastern Brazilian rainfall patterns [9], [10], and the frequency of severe Atlantic hurricanes [7]. In addition, the AMO alternately obscures and exaggerates the global increase in temperatures due to human-induced global warming [11], [12].

Although AMO is a feature of the North Atlantic Ocean basin, recent studies suggest that it is also related to multidecadal variability of Asian and Indian monsoons [13][17]. Through comprehensive observational analyses and ensemble experiments with atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs), it was found that twarm-phase AMO leads to warmer winters in much of China, resulting in less precipitation in coastal areas of southern China and more precipitation in northern China [17]. Wang et al. [16] extended these analyses to examine the seasonal dependence of the AMO influence on Asian monsoon. Their results indicated that warm-phase AMO causes increases in air temperature in East Asia and rainfall in Northeast China in all four seasons. In addition, positive phases of AMO induce strong Southeast and East Asian summer monsoons, and a late withdrawal of the Indian summer monsoon [15]. All these studies have together demonstrated a probable influence of Atlantic SST anomalies on Asian climate on multidecadal timescales.

However, only two full cycles of the AMO (from warm to cool phases) are represented in instrumental records. Thus, it is difficult to fully understand the low-frequency characteristics of AMO and mechanisms of its longer-term influence on East Asian climate [18], [19].

Several high-resolution proxies have been developed and used to assess longer-term annual to multidecadal variability in areas surrounding the North Atlantic, but none have looked at the longer-term (multicentennial) characteristics of AMO in East Asia [1], [19][21]. In this study, a climate signal with consistent AMO properties has been identified in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) tree-ring widths from trees growing in central eastern Siberia and northeastern China over the past 440 years (1568–2007 CE). This proxy reconstruction suggests a secular influence of AMO on moisture availability in the region. Perhaps most importantly, it provides support to the potential global nature of multidecadal climate variability related to AMO. The reconstruction is compared with both the instrumental AMO record and an existing multicentennial tree-ring reconstruction of AMO [20] to evaluate the AMO signal reliability.


A total of 191 tree-ring width records from moisture-sensitive Scots pine from six localities in northeastern Asia were assembled for this analysis (Fig. 1, Table 1). Four chronologies from Zhigansk, Khotugn, Tschita and Taksimo in central Siberia, Russia [22] were obtained from the International Tree Ring Data Bank (ITRDB; Two new chronologies were generated from 72 individual Scots pine trees from Mangui and Mengkeshan in northeastern China. To preserve the low-frequency variability, all raw tree-ring series were standardized by fitting them to negative exponential curves or linear regressions with negative or zero slopes. A nested approach as described in [23], which takes into account the decreasing number of chronologies back in time, was used to develop the longest possible proxy record. The first principle component of the chronologies (PC1) was employed to compare with the instrumental and Gray et al. (2004) tree-ring based AMO records. The standard chronologies were used in all the following analysis.

Figure 1. Map of correlation between annual mean precipitable water and annual AMO index (1948–2007) across northeast Asia.

Country boundaries for Russia, Mongolia, and northeast China are shown on the map. It is plotted by the NOAA/ESRL Physical Science Division, Boulder Colorado ( Letters on the map represent different tree-ring sampling sites: A – Zhigansk, B –Khotugn, C – Tschita, D – Taksimo, E – Mangui, F – Mengkeshan. Triangles, circles, and squares represent sampling sites, PDSI points, and weather stations, respectively. Differents colors represent different correlation coefficients marked as the legend at the bottom of the map. The figure on a contour represents the correlation coefficient of this contour.

Table 1. Site information and general statistics of six Scots pine tree-ring chronologies in northeast Asia.

Correlations between the six chronologies and the monthly instrumental AMO index calculated from North Atlantic SST anomalies [4], [24] were determined using Pearson correlation coefficients. Palmer Drought Severity Indices (PDSI) during warm (1930–1960) and cold (1970–1990) AMO phases [20] from six nearby climate stations also was compared to the PC1 series to assess the impact of AMO on local moisture conditions. PDSI is a prominent and often used index of meteorological drought to measure departures from local mean moisture conditions [25]. To identify the major periodicities present in our PC1 proxy record, a multi-tape method (MTM) spectral analysis [26] was performed. In addition, a cross wavelet analysis was employed to determine common power and relative phases of our PC1 record and the instrumental and reconstructed AMO [20] records in the time-frequency domain [27]. The Morlet wavelet (with ω0 = 6) was used in this analysis and the wavelet power significance was tested at the 95% confidence level against a red-noise background [28].


Correlation coefficients between the instrumental AMO series and individual tree-ring chronologies used to develop the new reconstruction show weak (Zhigansk), moderate (Khotugn and Mengkeshan), and strong (Taksimo, Tschita and Mangui) responses of tree growth to long term changes in North Atlantic SST (Table 2). PC1 of the six East Asian chronologies exhibits correlations of 0.37 and 0.70 with the annual and 11-year moving average AMO instrumental index (1856–2007), and correlations of 0.25 (Fig. 2) and 0.44 with the annual and 11-year moving average of the tree-ring based AMO reconstruction (1568–1990) [20], separately. The East Asian PC1 series, the AMO instrumental index, and the existing tree-ring based AMO record from the Atlantic rim exhibit similar annual and multidecadal patterns of variation over the past 152 years (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the AMO warm and cool phases of the East Asian series and the reconstruction from the Atlantic rim exhibit good correspondence except for the 18th century over the last 423 years (Fig. 3). The interval from the late1700s to the early 1800s seems to be a quasi-quiescent period of the AMO, which does not differ significantly from the series mean [20]. These results suggest that the variability observed in the instrumental AMO series imprint on tree-ring widths and that the warm AMO phases increase radial growth of Scots pine forests in northeast Asia.

Figure 2. Cross correlation between the tree-ring record from northeast Asia and Gray et al. (2004) AMO reconstruction.

Blue horizontal line represents a 95% significance level tested by Pearson correlation analysis.

Figure 3. Comparisons of the intrumental, reconstructed (this study) and Gry et al. (2004) reconstructed AMO index on annual and 11-year moving average basis.

(A) Annual comparison of instrumental AMO index [4] (blue line), the reconstructed proxy series from this study (black line), and [20] tree-ring based AMO reconstruction (red line). (B–D) The above three records smoothed with an 11-year low-pass filter. Red and blue shaded areas represent warm and cold AMO phases respectively. All series (A–D) were normalized by their means and standard deviations. (E) Sample depth in number of cores for the six tree-ring width chronologies.

Table 2. Correlation coefficients of monthly AMO index and six tree-ring chronologies (1856–2007).

MTM analysis of the East Asian PC1 series reveals pronounced variability at interannual (2.9–2.1 years) and multidecadal (33 and 73 years) time scales (Fig. 4A). The existing AMO reconstruction from the Atlantic rim [20] exhibited significant periods over a wide band from ∼40–128 year (Fig. 4B). However, the spectra for these two series showed very similar periodicities, with overlaps at 73, 2.9 and 2.1 years, while the AMO reconstruction from Atlantic rim has more long-periods such as 93, 60 and 44 year. A cross-wavelet transform of the East Asian PC1 series and the instrument AMO index shows a persistent and significant multidecadal signal centered on the roughly 70-year band almost throughout the whole instrumental period (1856–2007) (Fig. 5A). Cross-wavelet analysis tests the coherence between time series in the time-frequency domain. Similarly, the East Asian PC1 series also displays a strong coherence with the existing reconstruction in a band from ∼64–128 yr over the period 1568–1990 (Fig. 5B). These phase relationships indicate that the East Asian PC1 series and both the instrumental AMO index and the previous reconstruction are almost in phases in the sectors with significant common power. These also are confirmed by visual comparison of the series in Fig. 3. Additionally, there are short periods of significant common power in the 20- to 40- year bands between the two series from the late 1570s to the early 1620s. This may correspond to the shorter periodicity that [29] and [19] recently attributed to the AMO. MTM and cross-wavelet analysis support the probable link between this proxy series and multidecadal Atlantic SST variability.

Figure 4. Multi-taper method spectrums for this proxy series from 1564–2007 (A) and the tree-ring AMO reconstruction from Atlantic rim [20] (B).

Significance was tested at three levels (99%, 95% and 90%) against a red-noise background. Digital values are the significant periods at 99% confidence level.

Figure 5. Cross wavelet transforms of this proxy series and the AMO index [4] (upper panel) and [20] tree-ring based AMO index (lower panel).

The 95% significance level against red noise is shown as a black contour. The relative phase relationship is shown as arrows (with in-phase pointing right, anti-phase pointing left, and tree-ring index leading AMO by 90° pointing straight down).


Tree-ring time series from northeast Asia exhibit a coherent, AMO-like pattern of variability over the last 440 years. Although a mechanism for AMO influence on East Asian climate is not fully understood, findings reported here support other observational and modeling studies that have demonstrated multidecadal Asia monsoon variability is related to the AMO [15][17]. Winters tend to be warmer and wetter than normal in northeast China during positive phases of the AMO [17], which induces negative surface pressure anomalies across the North Atlantic to extend eastward to Eurasia and facilitate a weaker Mongolian High, and thus a subdued East Asian winter monsoon. Positive phases of AMO also are characterized by elevated air temperatures in East Asia and increased rainfall in northeast China in all four seasons [16]. These influences may arise from warming Eurasian middle and upper troposphere that result in weakened Asian winter monsoons but enhanced summer monsoons. All of these patterns together suggest that positive AMO phases may lead to moister conditions and longer growing seasons (warmer falls) in northeast Asia, which is supported by the comparisons of PDSI over the latest warm and cold AMO phases at six sampling sites (Table 3). An opposite pattern appears in negative phases of the AMO. In addition, precipitable water, a measure of moisture availability, is a total amount of water vapor in a column of the atmosphere, measured as if all fell to the ground as precipitation. It may affect temperature and precipitation, which in turn affects tree growth. Despite the low correlation coefficients, this point is also confirmed by spatial correlation fields between annual mean precipitable water and the instrumental AMO index (1948–2007) in this region (Fig. 1).

Table 3. Comparison of PDSI for the warm and cold AMO phases at six nearby sampling sites.

The results of correlation analyses between tree-ring chronologies and climatic factors indicate that both temperature and precipitation influence Scots pine growth at northeast Asia (not shown here), while the precipitation has less influence on tree-ring widths than temperature in this area especially for Khotugn and Mengkeshan. Also, the precipitation in the previous autumn and winter is important to tree growth, while the temperature have the similar influence during the previous autumn and current growing season. The cross correlation between the tree-ring record from northeast Asia and Gray et al. (2004) AMO reconstruction indicates that the maximum correlation (0.26) occurred at lag one year (Fig. 2). This may imply that the temperature or precipitation change of the AMO will affect the following tree growth in northeast Asia, or which may result from the strong first-order autocorrelation in this tree-ring record.

Further research is needed to explore how multidecadal variability in East Asian climate related to the AMO may have contingent effects on interannual to decadal climate variations and ecosystem processes. Recent studies of both Pacific and Atlantic Ocean climate teleconnections in western North America found that warm phases of the AMO synchronized sub-continental-scale patterns in droughts and forest fires across the western U.S [6], [30]. While both the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Pacific Dedacal Oscillation (PDO) were the main drivers of interannual to decadal patterns in droughts and fires, AMO conditionally changed the strength and spatial influence of ENSO and PDO effects at multidecadal time scales.

This is the first Asian AMO-like proxy series spanning the last four centuries. The proxy series confirms and extends previous observational and modeled analyses in which it was found that the AMO plays a role in the multidecadal variability in East Asian climate. Furthermore, our results support that the AMO continues with its quasi-cycle of roughly 70 (65–80) years as well as shown in other proxy series [1], [19][21]. Thus, the present AMO proxy record has important implications for explaining past climate change and forecasting future climate anomalies in northeast Asia.


We are appreciative of the field assistance received from the Tahe, Mohe, Mangui and Huzhong Forestry Bureaus.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XW. Performed the experiments: YZ LS. Analyzed the data: YZ LS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XC. Wrote the paper: XC PB. Interpreted data and revised important content: PB.


  1. 1. Delworth TL, Mann ME (2000) Observed and simulated multidecadal variability in the Northern Hemisphere. Climate Dynamics 16: 661–676.
  2. 2. Kerr RA (2000) A North Atlantic climate pacemaker for the centuries. Science 288: 1984–1985.
  3. 3. Knight JR, Allan RJ, Folland CK, Vellinga M, Mann ME (2005) A signature of persistent natural thermohaline circulation cycles in observed climate. Geophysical Research Letters 32: L20708.
  4. 4. Enfield DB, Mestas-Nuñez AM, Trimble PJ (2001) The Atlantic multidecadal oscillation and its relation to rainfall and river flows in the continental U.S. Geophysical Research Letters 28: 2077–2080.
  5. 5. Sutton RT, Hodson DLR (2005) Atlantic Ocean Forcing of North American and European Summer Climate. Science 309: 115–118.
  6. 6. McCabe GJ, Palecki MA, Betancourt JL (2004) Pacific and Atlantic Ocean influences on multidecadal drought frequency in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 4136–4141.
  7. 7. Zhang R, Delworth TL (2006) Impact of Atlantic multidecadal oscillations on India/Sahel rainfall and Atlantic hurricanes. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L17712.
  8. 8. Shanahan TM, Overpeck JT, Anchukaitis KJ, Beck JW, Cole JE, et al. (2009) Atlantic Forcing of Persistent Drought in West Africa. Science 324: 377–380.
  9. 9. Folland CK, Colman AW, Rowell DP, Davey MK (2001) Predictability of northeast Brazil rainfall and real-time forecast skill, 1987–98. Journal of Climate 14: 1937–1958.
  10. 10. Knight JR, Folland CK, Scaife AA (2006) Climate impacts of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L17706.
  11. 11. Kravtsov S, Spannagle C (2008) Multidecadal Climate Variability in Observed and Modeled Surface Temperatures. Journal of Climate 21: 1104–1121.
  12. 12. Zhang R, Delworth TL, Held IM (2007) Can the Atlantic Ocean drive the observed multidecadal variability in Northern Hemisphere mean temperature? Geophysical Research Letters 34: L02709.
  13. 13. Feng S, Hu Q (2008) How the North Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation may have influenced the Indian summer monsoon during the past two millennia. Geophysical Research Letters 35: L01707.
  14. 14. Goswami BN, Madhusoodanan MS, Neema CP, Sengupta D (2006) A physical mechanism for North Atlantic SST influence on the Indian summer monsoon. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L02706.
  15. 15. Lu R, Dong B, Ding H (2006) Impact of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on the Asian summer monsoon. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L24701.
  16. 16. Wang Y, Li S, Luo D (2009) Seasonal response of Asian monsoonal climate to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. Journal of Geophysical Research 114: D02112.
  17. 17. Li S, Bates GT (2007) Influence of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on the winter climate of East China. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 24: 126–135.
  18. 18. Wang S, Zhu J, Cai J (2004) Interdecadal variability of temperature and precipitation in China since 1880. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 21: 307–313.
  19. 19. Fortin D, Lamoureux SF (2009) Multidecadal hydroclimatic variability in northeastern North America since 1550 AD. Climate Dynamics 33: 427–432.
  20. 20. Gray ST, Graumlich LJ, Betancourt JL, Pederson GT (2004) A tree-ring based reconstruction of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation since 1567 A.D. Geophysical Research Letters 31: L12205.
  21. 21. Poore RZ, DeLong KL, Richey JN, Quinn TM (2009) Evidence of multidecadal climate variability and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation from a Gulf of Mexico sea-surface temperature-proxy record. Geo-Marine Letters 29: 477–484.
  22. 22. Rigling A, Waldner PO, Forster T, Braker OU, Pouttu A (2001) Ecological interpretation of tree-ring width and intraannual density fluctuations in Pinus sylvestris on dry sites in the central Alps and Siberia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 18–31.
  23. 23. D'Arrigo R, Wilson R (2006) On the Asian expression of the PDO. International Journal of Climatology 26: 1607–1617.
  24. 24. Kaplan A, Cane MA, Kushnir Y, Clement AC, Blumenthal MB, et al. (1998) Analyses of global sea surface temperature 1856–1991. Journal of Geophysical Research 103: 18,567–518,589.
  25. 25. Dai A, Trenberth KE, Qian T (2004) A global dataset of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870–2002: Relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. Journal of Hydrometeorology 5: 1117–1130.
  26. 26. Mann ME, Lees JM (1996) Robust estimation of background noise and signal detection in climatic time series. Climatic Change 33: 409–445.
  27. 27. Grinsted A, Moore JC, Jevrejeva S (2004) Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 11: 561–566.
  28. 28. Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 79: 61–78.
  29. 29. Hubeny JB, King JW, Santos A (2006) Subdecadal to multidecadal cycles of Late Holocene North Atlantic climate variability preserved by estuarine fossil pigments. Geology 34: 569–572.
  30. 30. Kitzberger T, Brown PM, Heyerdahl EK, Swetnam TW, Veblen TT (2007) Contingent Pacific-Atlantic Ocean influence on multi-century wildfire synchrony over western North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 543–548.