Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Evidence for a Fourteenth mtDNA-Encoded Protein in the Female-Transmitted mtDNA of Marine Mussels (Bivalvia: Mytilidae)

Evidence for a Fourteenth mtDNA-Encoded Protein in the Female-Transmitted mtDNA of Marine Mussels (Bivalvia: Mytilidae)

  • Sophie Breton, 
  • Fabrizio Ghiselli, 
  • Marco Passamonti, 
  • Liliana Milani, 
  • Donald T. Stewart, 
  • Walter R. Hoeh
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

A novel feature for animal mitochondrial genomes has been recently established: i.e., the presence of additional, lineage-specific, mtDNA-encoded proteins with functional significance. This feature has been observed in freshwater mussels with doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA (DUI). The latter unique system of mtDNA transmission, which also exists in some marine mussels and marine clams, is characterized by one mt genome inherited from the female parent (F mtDNA) and one mt genome inherited from the male parent (M mtDNA). In freshwater mussels, the novel mtDNA-encoded proteins have been shown to be mt genome-specific (i.e., one novel protein for F genomes and one novel protein for M genomes). It has been hypothesized that these novel, F- and M-specific, mtDNA-encoded proteins (and/or other F- and/or M-specific mtDNA sequences) could be responsible for the different modes of mtDNA transmission in bivalves but this remains to be demonstrated.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We investigated all complete (or nearly complete) female- and male-transmitted marine mussel mtDNAs previously sequenced for the presence of ORFs that could have functional importance in these bivalves. Our results confirm the presence of a novel F genome-specific mt ORF, of significant length (>100aa) and located in the control region, that most likely has functional significance in marine mussels. The identification of this ORF in five Mytilus species suggests that it has been maintained in the mytilid lineage (subfamily Mytilinae) for ∼13 million years. Furthermore, this ORF likely has a homologue in the F mt genome of Musculista senhousia, a DUI-containing mytilid species in the subfamily Crenellinae. We present evidence supporting the functionality of this F-specific ORF at the transcriptional, amino acid and nucleotide levels.

Conclusions/Significance

Our results offer support for the hypothesis that “novel F genome-specific mitochondrial genes” are involved in key biological functions in bivalve species with DUI.

Introduction

Apart from the nucleus, mitochondria are the only known organelles with their own DNA in animal cells. Given the abundance of animal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in animal tissues, strict maternal inheritance, the different evolutionary rates of its genes and the absence (or very low level) of recombination [1][3], this genome has come to be considered a reliable and robust marker for phylogenetic and population genetic studies as well as a model for the study of genome evolution [3], [4]. Comparative mitochondrial genomics has revealed that animal mtDNAs are very conserved in terms of gene content [4]. These small circular and typically intron-less molecules encode 2 ribosomal RNAs, 22 transfer RNAs and 13 protein subunits of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes and ATP synthase. The other subunits of the electron transport system (i.e., ∼65 subunits in mammals) as well as all the proteins and factors involved in other mitochondrial functions, such as mtDNA replication and mtDNA expression, are nuclear-encoded [4], [5]. However, with the increasing number of published mitochondrial genome sequences, examples of species that deviate from the gene content norm have been described in different animal groups including multiple species lacking one of the standard mitochondrial protein-coding genes [3]. In contrast, additional mitochondrial protein-coding genes, usually found in mtDNAs of the closest unicellular relatives of animals (e.g., mutS, dnaB, atp9, tatC in protists), have only been identified and annotated in the mitochondrial genomes of non-bilaterian animals (i.e., Cnidaria and Porifera; [3]).

One intriguing observation that emerged from sequencing studies of whole animal mtDNAs is the occurrence of numerous open reading frames (ORFs) of unknown function that are present in closely related species but for which homologues cannot be determined among more distantly related species [3], [6][11]. In bacterial and eukaryotic nuclear genomes, unique proteins that do not have recognizable homologues in other organisms (or that exist only in very closely related organisms) are commonly called “lineage-specific”, “taxonomically restricted” or “orphan” genes [12][14]. Interestingly, these lineage-specific genes have been shown to be involved in key biological functions and important adaptive processes [13][15]. For example, it has been demonstrated that species-specific differences in tentacle formation in the cnidarian genus Hydra correlate with expression of a taxonomically restricted gene encoding a small secreted protein of ∼85–105 amino acids [13]. Thus, the lineage-specific open reading frames that occur in animal mitochondrial genomes could potentially have functional significance. Lineage-specific mtDNA-encoded proteins are already known to play a role in sex determination in angiosperm plants exhibiting cytoplasmic male sterility [16]. Recently, we demonstrated the expression of two novel, sex-associated mtDNA-encoded proteins, the F- and M-ORFs, in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) [11]. Although bioinformatics tools have not allowed us to characterize these genes, we have found that the female-transmitted ORF protein is not only present in mitochondria but, more surprisingly, it is also present on the nuclear membrane and in the nucleoplasm of eggs [17]. These results established novel features for animal mitochondrial genomes: the presence of additional, lineage-specific, mtDNA-encoded proteins with functional significance and the involvement of mtDNA-encoded proteins in extramitochondrial functions. Interestingly, this discovery has been made in the only known animal group that does not transmit its mtDNA exclusively maternally [18], [19].

Unlike the system of strict maternal inheritance described in other animal species, bivalves belonging to the orders Mytiloida, Veneroida and Unionoida instead possess a system of doubly uniparental inheritance (DUI) of mtDNA [18], [19]. Specifically, DUI is a “mother-to-daughter” and “father-to-son” mtDNA inheritance system where females transmit their mt genomes (F mtDNA) to both sons and daughters, and males transmit their mt genomes (M mtDNA) to their sons [20][23]. Female offspring are typically homoplasmic ( = containing one mt genome) and male offspring are heteroplasmic [21], [23] but see [24], [25]. In marine mussels Mytilus spp., male somatic tissue contains predominantly the mtDNA of the mother (F genome) but male gametes contain exclusively the mtDNA of the father (M genome) [26], [27]. In contrast, the M-type genome is predominant in male somatic tissues of the marine clam Venerupis philippinarum, and also exclusive in male gametes [28]. Remarkably, amino acid sequence divergences between sex-associated mtDNAs can reach 20% (uncorrected p-distance) in marine mussels Mytilus and up to 50% in freshwater mussels [29][31]. The latter observation is likely due, in part, to the relative stability and antiquity of the unionoid bivalve F and M genomes, i.e., these two mt genomes have been separately transmitted for >200 my.

The newly identified F- and M-ORFs in freshwater mussels are not the only mitochondrial novelties with functional significance in these bivalves. It has been proposed that the C-terminus coding extension of the COX2 protein (Mcox2e), which is unique to freshwater mussel M genomes [32][36], could represent an “M-specific label” for sperm mitochondria that determines their fate in the fertilized eggs (as observed in Mytilus [37], [38]). In the marine mussel Mytilus spp., it has been proposed that the primary candidate for sequences that control the mode of inheritance of the two mitochondrial genomes would reside in the first variable domain (VD1) of the control region (CR) [39], [40]. The Mytilus CR can be divided in three domains based on indels and nucleotide variation [39], [40] (see also Figure 1): the first variable domain (VD1), which is the longest region of the CR, followed by a highly conserved middle domain (CD) and then a second variable domain (VD2), which is the shortest region of the CR. While the average DNA divergence between F and M genomes over the whole molecule may reach ∼20%, CD has diverged by only 1.5%, VD2 by about 15%, whereas VD1 is the most divergent part of the entire mt genome with DNA divergences averaging 50% [39][41]. Clearly, VD1 is under different, potentially sex-specific selective constraints, suggesting that it could play different roles in the F and M genomes [39], [40].

thumbnail
Figure 1. A typical Mytilus mitochondrial genome.

All genes are encoded on the same strand. Gene identities: nd1-6 and nd4l, NADH dehydrogenase subunits 1–6 and 4L; cytb, cytochrome b; cox1-3, cytochrome c oxidase subunits I–III; atp6-8, ATP synthase subunit 6 and 8 (protein-coding genes in white); 12SrRNA and 16SrRNA, small and large subunits of ribosomal RNA (in light gray). Transfer RNA genes are depicted by one-letter amino acid codes (in gray). The red and blue lines at the inner periphery of the ring represent EST sequences for the F and M mt genomes of M. edulis/M. galloprovincialis, respectively. Schematics of the structure of a typical F-type (left) and M-type (right) control regions, which are located between the 16SrRNA and trnY genes, are shown. The F-ORF-VD1 is identified in the F-type control region. CR, control region; CD, conserved domain; VD1, variable domain 1; VD2, variable domain 2 [39], [40]. The mean size of each domain of the CR is shown. *The “standard” F-type CR of M. trossulus, which is a F/M recombinant CR, is not presented.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.g001

An interesting difference between marine mussels and freshwater mussels is that only in the former group have F mt genomes periodically experienced “role-reversal events” and invaded the male route of inheritance, resulting in the formation of new M mt genomes [42][44]. These new M mt genomes (known as recently masculinized M types) are essentially recombinants composed of an F genome's coding and control regions with an additional CR from a so-called “standard M” genome inserted into the F-type CR [30], [45][47]. It has therefore been suggested that the incorporation of sequences from the CR of a standard M genome into an F genome could be responsible for the paternal transmission route of the recombinant mtDNA genome [18], [30], [39], [47], [48]. However, attempts to confirm mitochondrial sequences and/or mt encoded proteins that are responsible for the different modes of mtDNA transmission under DUI have not been successful.

To date, much of the work on marine mussels, Mytilus spp., has focused on F vs. M-specific mtDNA motifs in the CR as potential features that could determine whether a genome will follow the maternal or the paternal mode of inheritance [39], [40], [45], [46]. Herein, we re-investigated all complete (or nearly complete) F, standard M and recently masculinized M mytilid mt genomes and control regions previously sequenced for the presence of ORFs that could have functional importance in these bivalves. Our results confirm the presence of a novel F genome-specific ORF of significant length (>375 nt), located in VD1, that most likely has functional significance in marine mussels (Mytilus spp.). The identification of this ORF in the relatively closely related Mytilus edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. trossulus and in the more distantly related, also DUI-containing, M. californianus [49] and M. coruscus (evidence from GenBank) suggests that it has been maintained in the mytilid lineage (subfamily Mytilinae) for ∼13 million years [50]. Furthermore, this ORF likely has a homologue in the F mt genome of Musculista senhousia, a DUI-containing mytilid species in the subfamily Crenellinae [51]. Our results offer support for the hypothesis that “novel mt genome-specific genes” are involved in key biological functions, such as mtDNA transmission, in bivalve species with DUI.

Results and Discussion

Identification of open reading frames (ORFs) in the control regions of Mytilus mt genomes

To assess whether F and M mitochondrial control regions (CR) could possess ORFs that could have functional importance in Mytilus bivalves, we first investigated complete mtDNAs previously sequenced for the Mytilus edulis species complex (i.e., M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. trossulus of the subfamily Mytilinae). Our results indicate that the VD1 of the F-type CR contains one conserved ORF (F-orf-vd1) of substantial length (>100aa). F-orf-vd1 has complete start and stop codons and is located on the same strand as all other mtDNA-encoded genes (Figure 1 and Tables 1 and 2). The predicted length of the F-ORF-VD1 protein is 163 amino acids (aa) for M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis and 153aa for M. trossulus. Interestingly, F-ORF-VD1 was also detected in the F-type CR sequences of the more distantly related species M. californianus (129aa) and M. coruscus (127aa). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the F-ORF-VD1 region represents a new Mytilus mitochondrial gene with biological significance. In contrast to the F-type CR, conserved ORFs of similar sizes were not found in any of the M-type VD1 regions (Figure 1 and Tables 1 and 2). Assessing homology using a combination of sequence and position similarity, M-type ORFs of 94aa and 112aa were found in M. edulis VD1, ORFs of 21 and 42aa were found in M. galloprovincialis and ORFs of 73aa and 74aa were found in M. trossulus VD1 (Tables 1 and 2). Notably, ORFs of different sizes (24aa to >100aa) were identified within each species in the other complete M-type VD1 sequences available in GenBank, including the more distantly related M. californianus (30 and 32aa) (Figure S1). Moreover, analysis of these M-type ORF sequences using the testcode algorithm [52], which recognizes potential protein-coding sequences by evaluating the distribution of nucleotides at the third codon positions within a reading frame, suggests that they are non-coding (Table 3; probability of coding <30%). The gene-finding program Glimmer3 [53], which uses an interpolated Markov model scoring algorithm that computes the log-likelihood that a given interval on a DNA sequence was generated by a model of coding versus non-coding DNA, also failed to identify these M-type ORFs as putative protein-coding genes (data not shown). Contrary to the testcode algorithm that does not provide reliable results for sequences <200 bp [52], Glimmer3 is highly precise and sensitive to find protein-coding genes as small as 90 bp and usually detects >98% of genes in prokaryotic genomes with a limited number of false positive predictions [53]. It is also a very effective gene finder for eukaryotic genomes [54], and its accuracy to identify unannotated genes has been convincingly demonstrated by laboratory experiments [53]. For example, Glimmer3 predicted 16 out of 17 new proteins confirmed by protein-based experiments on the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus [53]. Only the 13 typical mitochondrial protein-coding genes were successfully identified in the Mytilus M genomes using Glimmer3 (no additional ORF were found on the coding strand). These results support previous inferences that the M-type VD1 might function at the DNA or RNA level because of the presence of potential tRNA-like secondary structures in this domain [39], [40].

thumbnail
Table 1. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of mytilid species with DUI used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. General Characteristics of F and M ORFs in the VD1 domain of the Mytilus spp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.t002

The situation for the F-type VD1 is remarkably different. Specifically, “full length” F-ORF-VD1s were found in all M. californianus VD1 (n = 3), in all but 3 (12/15) M. trossulus VD1 and in all but 8 (41/49) of the M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis VD1 that have been completely sequenced to date (Figure S2) [39], [40], [45], [46], [55][57]. It is worth noting, however, that all three “truncated” vs. “full-length” M. trossulus F-ORF-VD1s (i.e., those with109aa instead of 153aa) and 7 of the 8 truncated M. edulis/M. galloprovincialis F-ORF-VD1 (84 to 144aa instead of 163aa) were found in recombinant CR sequences that consist of both F-type and M-type CR segments or in duplicated F-type CRs [40], [46], [56]. In M. trossulus, all three truncated ORF sequences were due to a guanine base deletion at position 295 (out of 462 nt) in a segment consisting of a stretch of 5 Gs in “full length” M. trossulus F-orf-vd1 sequences (Figure S2). However, this deletion was absent in all partially sequenced M. trossulus F-type VD1 available in GenBank (n = 156), which correspond to the first 407 nt of the F-orf-vd1 and, when translated, to the first 135aa of the F-ORF-VD1 without any stop codon. These observations raise the possibility that the 3 truncated M. trossulus F-orf-vd1 sequences might represent sequencing errors. In the case of M. edulis/M. galloprovincialis, all “truncated” F-orf-vd1 sequences observed in recombinant CR sequences were also found to occur only in sperm, i.e., these haplotypes were consistently absent from females [46], suggesting that they could represent recently-masculinized CR sequences (see below). A unique “truncated” F-orf-vd1 sequence, due to a nucleotide insertion in a non-recombinant CR sequence, has been found in the complete M. edulis F genome (Figure S2), which was obtained from cloning experiments [58][60]. Multiple rounds of cloning or a sequencing error could explain this particular exception.

Support for identifying F-orf-vd1 as a protein-coding gene

Support at the transcriptional level.

The maintenance of “full length” F-orf-vd1 regions in the closely related Mytilus edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. trossulus as well as in the more distantly related M. californianus and M. coruscus, which represents ∼13 million years of Mytilus mussel evolution [50], strongly argues in favor of functionality for this open reading frame. The hypothesis that the F-type but not the M-type VD1 encodes a protein is consistent with previous observations that F and M VD1 are under different selective regimes and likely explains why the intergenomic DNA divergences between F and M VD1 are the highest for Mytilus mitochondrial genomes [39], [40]. As listed in Table 2, the mean DNA divergences between aligned portions of the putative F-orf-vd1 and the M-type VD1 within each species exceed by far those observed for the recently identified, rapidly evolving atp8 gene [61]. The maintenance of a functional ORF only in the F lineage would explain not only the high intergenomic divergences but also support the hypothesis that VD1 has a sex-specific function [39], [40], [45], specifically, that the F-ORF-VD1 is a novel mitochondrial protein with a F-specific function in Mytilus mussels. In support for such a role, testcode predictions of protein coding function for the F-orf-vd1sequences are, with the exception of M. coruscus (probability of coding = 30%), all very high (Table 3). The gene-finding program Glimmer3 [53] also predicts the protein coding nature of the F-orf-vd1 sequences. The program attributes a score to each orf, providing a consistent scale to compare coding potential scores of different orfs [53]. For example, the Mytilus edulis F-orf-vd1 presents a higher coding potential score (8.99) than the typical mitochondrial protein-coding genes cox1-cox2-cox3, cob, nd3-nd4l, and atp8 (3.93 to 8.26), and a lower score than nd1-nd2-nd4-nd5-nd6, and atp6 (9.23 to 10.77). The reason why testcode classified the M. coruscus F-orf-vd1 sequence as non-coding and the M. californianus and M. senhousia F-orfs as having 77% probability of coding could be explained by the high variability of this putative gene (see below). Indeed, fast-evolving genes are often rated as non-coding by the testcode algorithm, presumably because the mechanisms generating diversity are stronger than the ones encouraging consistent codon preference [52].

Interestingly, corroborative evidence for the protein-coding nature of F-orf-vd1 was also obtained from BLASTN searches against dbEST (Expressed Sequence Tag division, EST_others). For example, for the more extensively studied M.edulis/M. galloprovincialis, a total of 366 and 194 ESTs were aligned to the complete F and M mt genomes with nucleotide identity >96%, respectively (out of 24,611 ESTs from >20 different polyadenylated cDNA libraries; [62][66]). The ESTs cover 14,994 bp (89.6%) of the F mt genome and 9,868 bp (59.3%) of the M mt genome. Figure 1 reports the M. edulis/M. galloprovincialis F and M ESTs mapped on the completely sequenced Mytilus mtDNA. The majority of ESTs (n = 168 for the F genome and n = 156 for the M genome) are derived from 16S and 12S rRNAs, suggesting a higher expression level and/or a higher stability compared to other mt genes. Given that ESTs come from multiple cDNA libraries constructed using different methods [62][66], and because it is absent in both F and M mt genomes and thus less likely to be the result of the trimming of low quality sequences or the cloning procedure (e.g., [66], [67]), the lack of ESTs corresponding to the F- and M-type nad4L gene suggests that this transcript might be expressed at low levels and/or might be rapidly degraded in M. edulis/M. galloprovincialis. Similarly, the absence of several tRNA-like ESTs for both F and M genomes could be explained by their removal from mature polyadenylated transcripts [67], [68]. Furthermore, the typical utilization of Mytilus somatic tissues in cDNA library preparations [62][66] can explain the lower coverage of the M mt genome by M-type ESTs, given that somatic tissues predominantly contain and express the F-type mtDNA [26].

Remarkably, the EST analysis yielded 11 significant hits for M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis F-orf-vd1 sequences whereas neither the second variable domain (VD2) of the F-type control region nor the M-type VD2 was present in ESTs (Figure 1; the 11 hits are AJ626121, AJ626242, AJ626130, AJ626120, AJ626205, AJ626443, AJ626444, AJ626129, AJ626131, AJ623360, AJ624518). Because only the last 270 bp of F-orf-vd1 are covered by EST sequences (Figure 1), one could argue that these transcripts represent by-products from an unprocessed polycistronic transcript precursor. However, the observation that 6 other mitochondrial genes (i.e., cox1, cob, nad1, nad2, nad4, and nad5) were not represented by “full-length ESTs” containing the entire gene, i.e. only partial transcripts were found in dbEST (data not shown), suggests a reduced enrichment in full-length cDNAs in Mytilus libraries. Moreover, since the VD1-like ESTs have been obtained by oligo-dT priming of mussel mRNA [64], [65], they are expected to originate from polyadenylated mature transcripts. Taking together, these findings suggest that the F-type VD1 is expressed in the Mytilus mitochondrial proteome. On the other hand, since we also found significant hits for F-type CD (3 hits) and part of M-type VD1 and CD sequences (2 hits) (see Figure 1), the possibility remains that all of these polyadelynated transcripts function at the RNA level. Polyadenylated transcripts derived from a putative non-coding region have previously been reported in the oyster Crassostrea gigas [67]. The authors hypothesized that this intergenic segment located between the atp6 and nd2 genes could represent the mitochondrial control region, which is polyadenylated at a high level in several mammal species [67][70]. However, it appears that this intergenic segment in C. gigas actually contains the “formerly reported as missing” atp8 gene in these bivalves [61]. Interestingly, the polyadenylated mitochondrial CR sequences observed in mammals have been proposed to be multi-functional molecules serving as primers for mtDNA replication, regulators for replication and translation processes through rRNA binding as well as protein-coding mRNAs [68][73]. For example, Nakamichi et al. [73] reported a CR transcript in humans that could code for a peptide of 76 amino acids. The possibility thus remains that CR transcripts in Mytilus function in different ways, i.e., that F-orf-vd1 functions at both RNA and protein levels (or at the protein level only) and that other CR transcripts function at the RNA level. Another hypothesis would be that the M-type VD1 also functions at the protein level but that its function is supported by smaller ORFs such as those found in the M-type VD1 domain of M. californianus. Further data collection and investigation will be essential to clarify the functional role of these CR transcripts and ORFs.

Support at the amino acid level.

The analysis of the taxonomic distribution of the F-ORF-VD1 in mytilid mussels is one other important step in the assessment of its potential functional role as a protein. To establish whether the F-ORF-VD1 is taxonomically restricted to the genus Mytilus or if it is an evolutionary feature of mytilid mussels, we screened for the presence of F-specific ORFs in the newly sequenced mitochondrial genome of the DUI-containing mytilid Musculista senhousia from the subfamily Crenellinae (Passamonti et al. submitted). Within the Bivalvia, mytilid mussels form a monophyletic group where Musculista and Mytilus are invariably clustered together, while freshwater mussels (Unionoida), including the species Venustaconcha ellipsiformis, are confirmed basal and fully separated from all other autolamellibranchiate lineages, including the Mytilidae ([31], [74]; Plazzi & Passamonti unpublished). Interestingly, we found one relatively large unassigned region specific to the F genome of M. senhousia (UR2 = 543 bp) preceding the control region and containing an ORF of considerable length (121aa). The M. senhousia F-ORF possesses complete start and stop codons, is located on the same strand as all other mtDNA-encoded genes, and has a probability of coding of 77% (Tables 2 and 3).

At the amino acid level, comparisons among predicted sequences for Mytilus spp. F-ORF-VD1 and the M. senhousia F-ORF revealed this putative gene as the least conserved in the Mytilus F lineage, with aa sequence identities ∼1.5–2.5 times lower than those obtained for the highly variable ATP8 protein, and among the least conserved in mytilid mussels (Table 4). For example, 24% amino acid identities are observed for the F-specific ORFs between the distantly related Mytilus edulis and Musculista senhousia species, whereas 18% amino acid identities are observed for ATP8 (and 74% for COX1). Figure 2 shows the alignment of all mytilid F-specific ORFs. The greatest similarity among all species is principally found within a stretch of 60 residues in the middle of the protein sequence. As expected for a rapidly evolving protein, sequence differences between the F-ORF from M. senhousia and the F-ORF-VD1 from Mytilus spp. are more pronounced (Figure 2). These results suggest that, if they are functionally equivalent proteins, constraints on M. senhousia F-ORF and Mytilus F-ORF-VD1 are imposed at higher levels of protein structure rather than the amino acid sequence level. In support of this hypothesis, the amino acid compositions of the M. senhousia F-ORF and Mytilus F-ORF-VD1 are slightly different (Figure 3A), but their compositions of chemically equivalent amino acids (i.e., with similar properties) are similar (Figure 3B) and comparable to what is observed for the fast-evolving mtDNA-encoded protein ATP8 (Figure 3C & D). In contrast, the translated M-ORF found in the VD1 domain of M genomes shows high variability with regards to amino acid composition (Figure 3E & F). These results, which can be explained by the presence of frameshifts, premature stop codons and important differences in length in M-ORF sequences, are in agreement with the hypothesis that only the mytilid F-ORF codes for a functional protein. If the F-ORF would not be functional at the protein level, one would expect the presence of within- and between-species “coding disablements”, such as the numerous frameshift mutations and premature stop-codons seen in M-ORF sequences. Furthermore, amino acid compositional similarities among mytilid species (or even between F-ORF sequences and protein-coding genes within a same genome) would not be expected from non protein-coding sequences since they are not subject to selective pressure to preserve protein structure and function [75]. In this latter case, however, similar mtDNA nucleotide bias and common evolutionary history could at least partly explain the observed results [75][77]. For example, it has been demonstrated that amino acid frequencies in proteins or in translations of randomly selected non-coding sequences are changing in response to the genomic change in G+C (or A+T) content, that is GC-rich codons and corresponding amino acids will increase in frequency in proteins and translated non-coding sequences in genomes with increasing G+C content, whereas AT-rich codons and corresponding amino acids will increase in frequency in proteins and translated non-coding sequences in genomes with increasing A+T content [75], [76]. A+T contents are relatively similar for both F-ORF-VD1 and ATP8 in Mytilus spp. (52–57% for the F-ORF-VD1 and 58–59% for ATP8), whereas Musculista values are higher with 68% A+T for the F-ORF and 68.9% for ATP8. Proportions of AT-rich codons and corresponding FYMINK amino acids [75] are slightly higher in Musculista for the F-ORF (25.6% vs. 13–21.7% for Mytilus) but comparable for ATP8 (26% vs. 26–28.5% for Mytilus). Although preliminary, these results indicate a potential correlation between DNA composition and amino acid compositional similarities of F-ORF sequences but they do not rule out the hypothesized protein-coding function of the F-ORF in mytilid mussels. In addition and of significant relevance here is our observation that a single, conserved predicted transmembrane helix (TMH) is present in the N terminal portion of all mytilid F-ORF proteins (Figure 4), suggesting that this putative gene would assume the underlying DNA composition of the mtDNA to the extent that this does not interfere with the secondary structure and biochemical function of the protein. Like typical animal mitochondrial genes, which all encode TMH proteins of the oxidative phosphorylation system in the inner mitochondrial membrane [4], [5], the F-ORF protein could be an element of the electron transport chain or ATP synthase complex in mytilid mussels. However, the recent finding that F-ORF proteins likely play a role in sex determination in unionoid bivalves indicates that the mytilid F-ORF proteins could also have a non-oxidative phosphorylation function [17]. Although our results suggest stabilizing selection on the F-ORF region's amino acid composition and secondary structure and support the protein-coding hypothesis, further protein-based analyses will be necessary to characterize the biological significance of the mytilid ORFs, and to verify if they are functionally equivalent. Additional complete mt genomes, from mytilid and non-mytilid bivalves, are needed to elucidate the number, taxonomic distribution, and evolution of uncharacterized ORFs in this group of molluscs.

thumbnail
Figure 2. T-COFFEE alignment of the translated F-specific ORF sequences of mytilid mussels.

Three of more identical amino acids within a column are highlighted in blue. Conservation (Cons.) score values and quality (Qual.) of the alignment are indicated. Dashes (–) denote a missing residue at this position in comparison with other sequence(s). Mca, M. californianus; Mco, M. coruscus; Med, M. edulis; Mga, M. galloprovincialis; Mse, M. senhousia; Mtr, M. trossulus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Amino acid composition of mytilid F-specific ORFs, protein-coding gene ATP8 and putative M-ORF-VD1.

(A) Overall amino acid composition of Mytilus spp. F-ORF-VD1 and M. senhousia F-ORF protein sequences. (B) Composition of chemically equivalent amino acids of Mytilus spp. F-ORF-VD1 and M. senhousia F-ORF protein sequences. (C) Overall amino acid composition of Mytilus spp. F-ATP8 and M. senhousia F-ATP8 protein sequences. (D) Composition of chemically equivalent amino acids of Mytilus spp. F-ATP8 and M. senhousia F-ATP8 protein sequences (M. coruscus atp8 sequence is not available in GenBank). (E) Overall amino acid composition of the putative Mytilus spp. M-ORF-VD1 (*mean values for several M-ORF-VD1 GenBank sequences for each species). (F) Composition of chemically equivalent amino acids of the putative Mytilus spp. M-ORF-VD1 (such ORF has not been found in M. senhousia). Amino acid composition is reported as percentage. Mca, M. californianus; Mco, M. coruscus; Med, M. edulis; Mga, M. galloprovincialis; Mse, M. senhousia; Mtr, M. trossulus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Comparisons of Mytilus spp. F-ORF-VD1 and M. senhousia F-ORF hydropathy profiles.

(A) Profiles for each species were calculated by the method of Kyte and Doolittle [104]. Numbers below profiles designate amino acid positions in each protein. Predicted transmembrane domains according to TMpred [102] (all with significant scores >500) are shown in light gray (It has to be noted that a single TMH in the N terminal portion of each F-ORF proteins has also been identified using HMMTOP [101]). (B) T-COFFEE alignment of the translated N terminal portions of mytilid F-specific ORF sequences. Predicted transmembrane domains according to TMpred [102] are shown in light gray. (C) Kyte and Doolittle profiles for the F-ORF protein alignment with the homologous amino acid sites in the same position on the x axis. The predicted transmembrane domain according to TMpred [102] is shown in light gray. Mca, M. californianus; Mco, M. coruscus; Med, M. edulis; Mga, M. galloprovincialis; Mse, M. senhousia; Mtr, M. trossulus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.g004

thumbnail
Table 4. Interspecies comparisons in the mytilid F lineage (Mytilus spp. and Musculista senhousia) for the fast evolving F-ORF-VD1 & F-ORF and ATP8 genes: % amino acid identities.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.t004

Support at the nucleotide level.

Due to alignment issues, nucleotide-level analyses were performed using the more similar Myilus spp. F-orf-vd1 sequences (i.e., we excluded Musculista senhousia). Comparisons of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (Ks), nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (Ka) and Ka/Ks ratios within and between Mytilus species also provide evidence that F-orf-vd1 encodes a functional protein: within species Ka/Ks ratios are higher than between species Ka/Ks ratios, which are usually well below 1 and thus indicate purifying selection (Table 5). A lower between-species Ka/Ks is a common finding for mtDNA-encoded protein genes in animals and is explained by the elimination of mildly deleterious polymorphisms from populations before fixation [78][80]. Such results would not be expected for non-protein coding sequences. A more exhaustive analysis was undertaken to test the null hypothesis of neutrality and search for the signature of purifying and/or positive selection by calculating the Ka/Ks ratio at each codon site with the SELECTON program using a Bayesian approach [81]. In essence, neutrality is indicated by Ka/Ks = 1, purifying selection by Ka/Ks<1, and positive selection is usually invoked as a possible explanation for rare cases where the pattern Ka/Ks>1 is observed. The idea is that substitutions at synonymous sites are largely selectively neutral relative to the intensity of selection at nonsynonymous sites and very low proportion of amino acid replacement can be interpreted as a reflection of purifying selection maintaining a functional protein. By contrast, under positive selection, rapid replacement of an amino acid is advantageous to the organism; hence, nonsynonymous mutations are fixed at a rate higher than that of neutral synonymous ones [81], [82]. According to our results, the MEC selection model was significantly preferred than the null model M8a (AICc score for MEC is 8195.54 while AICc score for M8a is 13981.56) and suggested 35 putative positively selected residues. For the full alignment and Bayesian Ka/Ks ratios obtained from the models, see Figure S3. Specifically, Mytilus spp. COX1 residues were all found to be under strong purifying selection whereas of the 165 amino acid positions in the F-ORF-VD1 alignment portion, 125 residues (76%) were found under purifying selection, 5 (3%) were under neutral selection and 35 (21%) were found to possess a Ka/Ks>1, indicating positive selection. However, the inference of positive selection was not considered statistically significant for any particular residue. Most of the unconserved 35 positions were located in the C-terminal portion of the protein (54%), whereas 23% of them were found within the more conserved stretch of 60 residues in the middle of the protein sequence (see Figure 2) and 17% were found in the TMH portion of the Mytilus spp. F-ORF-VD1 (data not shown). Overall, our results suggest that even if most of the sites are subjected to purifying selection, which is suggestive of a functional constraint, the presence of several sites with Ka/Ks>1 indicate that the F-orf-vd1 is a fast evolving gene in the Mytilus F genome. As recently proposed for the highly variable atp8 gene in these species [83], relaxed purifying selection coupled with the compensation-draft feedback process [80] could cause the faster evolution of F-orf-vd1. Specifically, the compensation-draft feedback process postulates that fixation of a mildly deleterious mutation favors compensatory mutations within the same or interacting polypeptides, which in turn can result in fixation of new mildly deleterious mutations by genetic draft due to the linked, non-recombining genes in mitochondrial DNA [80]. The compensation-draft feedback process could have been initiated by selection for an F-specific function for the F-ORF-VD1.

thumbnail
Table 5. DNA comparisons in the Mytilus F lineage for the fast evolving F-orf-vd1 gene: selective pressures at synonymous and nonsynonymous sites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.t005

Interestingly, the newly discovered F and M lineage-specific proteins in freshwater mussel species are also among the fastest evolving proteins coded by freshwater mussel mitochondrial genomes [11], [17]. These findings suggest that mt lineage-specific genes or DNA regions are potential targets for positive selection and thus they might play an important role in bivalve speciation (i.e, mitochondrial populations of the same species could quickly diverge, and possibly become reproductively isolated because of mitochondrial-nuclear incompatibilities; [84]).

Novel mtDNA-encoded genes in bivalve species with DUI

Assuming a single origin of DUI [31], [85], [86], the F lineage specific ORFs in both marine and freshwater mussels could represent homologous genes. However, as is the case for the novel, F- and M-specific, mtDNA-encoded proteins in freshwater mussels [11], [17], the precise function of the F-ORF-VD1 protein in marine mussels remains unclear. In freshwater mussels, no significant amino acid sequence similarity with known proteins was found for the F-ORF using BLAST Tools, but the estimated tertiary structure of the F-ORF from the species Venustaconcha ellipsiformis is consistent with involvement of this novel mitochondrial protein in DNA replication and/or DNA binding [17]. In the present study, sequence similarity searches for Mytilus F-ORF-VD1 using PSI-BLAST [87] against non-redundant protein sequences and SWISSPROT databases also failed to detect significant sequence similarity with known proteins. However, searching against the Protein Data Bank (PDB; [88]) revealed that the M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis F-ORF-VD1 exhibit relatively weak sequence similarity (E-value of 0.004) to an archaebacterial DNA helicase, suggesting that it could be a DNA-binding protein involved in regulation of mitochondrial DNA replication and/or transcription as might be the case for the F-ORF in freshwater mussels. To our knowledge, helicase genes have never been reported in animal mitochondrial DNA [3], [89]. However, a putative helicase has been reported in the mitochondrial genome of the plant Marchantia polymorpha [90]. Moreover, the possibility of open reading frames in the mitochondrial control region playing a role in the replication and/or transcription process has been previously reported in some mammals [6] and Paramecium [91]. It is also worth noting that many of the “unusual” protein-coding genes discovered in invertebrate mitochondrial genomes contain amino acid patterns characteristic of interaction with DNA [3], [8], [92], [93]. However, at this moment, it is not possible to confirm the hypothesis that the F-specific ORFs in marine and freshwater mussels are homologous due to their highly divergent nature and incomplete knowledge regarding their phylogenetic distribution.

Irrespective of a common vs. independent origins for the F-specific ORFs in marine and freshwater mussels, there are at least three possibilities for their source: (i) a gene homologous to ancestral bacterial protein-coding genes, (ii) a duplicated and diverged mitochondrial gene or (iii) a transfer from the nucleus to the mitochondrion [93], [94]. Again, because of their relatively fast evolutionary rate, the F-specific ORF sequences have probably changed to such an extent that their historical antecedents are no longer recognizable at the aa sequence level. Based on currently available data, the F-ORF in freshwater mussels has persisted for >200 my [11], [17]. As is the case for F-ORF-VD1 in Mytilus spp. and F-ORF in M. senhousia, the sequence similarity is low among distantly related freshwater mussels species, but selection has maintained at least one aspect of the secondary structure of the protein: one predicted TMH in the N-terminal portion of the protein [11], [17]. However, the amino acid divergences and differences in amino acid composition between the mytilid ORFs and the F-ORF protein of the freshwater mussel species Venustaconcha ellipsiformis are much more pronounced than between the Mytilus spp. F-ORF-VD1 and the M. senhousia F-ORF (Figure S4). Again, further protein-based analyses will be necessary to characterize the biological significance and critically evaluate the hypothesized functional equivalence of the F-specific ORFs in bivalves.

The study of masculinized genomes to identify sequences responsible for mitochondrial transmission mode

As mentioned earlier, a phenomenon that characterizes marine mussels is that female-transmitted mt genomes have periodically experienced “role-reversal events” and invaded the male route of inheritance, resulting in the formation of new M mt genomes [42][44]. Previous sequencing studies have demonstrated that all “recently-masculinized” or RM-mitotypes examined to date in mytilid mussels are recombinants composed of an F genome's genes and CR plus an additional M-type CR [30], [45][47]. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that recombination with the introduction of a “Standard Male” or SM-type CR into an otherwise female type mt genome could be the first step in the masculinization process [48]. However, to establish that a genome is masculinized, one needs to demonstrate that the genome is the exclusive mtDNA molecule in the sperm of the male from which it was extracted [40], [47]. Indeed, RM-type sequences obtained from male gonad DNA extractions could be artifacts due to somatic tissue contamination. This logic makes the fully sequenced “C genome” of M. galloprovincialis, which was extracted from spermatozoa that were forced to swim through a Percoll™ solution to remove of any debris from somatic cells, the only verified masculinized genome sequenced to date [47]. We will thus mainly refer to this sequence in the section below.

Because the first variable domain VD1 has been identified as the most likely site for sequences that could control the mode of inheritance of the mitochondrial genome [39], [40], examination of RM-type VD1 sequences is essential to address the hypothesis that these sequences could determine maternal vs. paternal inheritance. The control region of the recently masculinized, male-transmitted “C genome” of M. galloprovincialis is composed of an F-type VD1 followed by an M-type CD, an M-type VD2 and a truncated M-type VD1 (i.e., VD1F/CDM/VD2M/ΔVD1M) [40], [47]. After VD1F, the segment “CDM/VD2M/ΔVD1M” is repeated tandemly three times. The third repeat unit is followed by one complete CDM and one F/M recombinant VD2 (Figure 5).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Schematics of the structure of a typical F-type (above), recently-masculinized (center, according to Venetis et al. [47]) and typical M-type (below) control regions.

The F-ORF-VD1 is identified in the F-type control region. The amino acids that constitute the putative transmembrane helix are indicated in boldface type and bigger characters. The stretch of ∼60 residues showing the greatest similarity among the species is underlined. Dashes (–) denote the missing amino acid residues in the truncated F-ORF-VD1. CD, conserved domain; VD1, variable domain 1; VD2, variable domain 2 [39], [40]. *The “standard” F-type CR of M. trossulus, which is a F/M recombinant CR, is not presented.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.g005

From an “ORF point of view”, the M. galloprovincialis “C genome” is different from the standard F-type mtDNA of the same species in having a truncated (at the C-terminus) F-ORF-VD1 protein (139aa instead of 163aa; Figure 5). It has to be noted that the deleted protein region does not involve the conserved 60aa stretch observed among mytilid species. We have shown that standard F genomes consistently possess a “full length” F-ORF-VD1 (with one exception that could represent a sequencing error), suggesting the hypothesis that a “full length” F-ORF-VD1 is (i) necessary for maternal transmission and/or (ii) its presence could interfere with male transmission. Further evidence in support of this hypothesis is that, except for the singular sequence mentioned above, all truncated F-ORF-VD1 sequences have been found in recombinant CR sequences and are consistently absent from females (i.e., these haplotypes occur only in sperm and could represent recently masculinized CR sequences). The presence of a truncated F-ORF-VD1 in recently masculinized genomes thus suggests that, to enable paternal transmission, a standard F genome must gain a new M functionality (i.e., gain M-type CR sequences) as well as lose an F functionality (i.e., the disruption of F-ORF-VD1). One hypothesis is that the disruption of F-ORF-VD1 occurs first and subsequently this disruption would facilitate F/M recombination, which has been proposed as the first step in the masculinization process [48]. An alternative hypothesis would be that the deletions in the F-ORF-VD1 regions of RM genomes are a consequence of masculinization. If the F-ORF-VD1 is required only for F mt function, its presence in a paternally-transmitted M genome would allow its degeneration. However, we still do not know enough about the recombination process and developmental genetics of DUI to speculate on where and when recombination is likely occurring, though it might happen during spermatogenesis when the five so-called “mega-mitochondria” form in the mid-piece of a spermatozoon by fusion of several smaller mitochondria [37], [95]. Because of the apparently dynamic nature of DUI in marine mussels, the “Standard Male” genomes in all Mytilus examined to date are likely the product of previous role reversal events. To reject the hypothesized primacy of F-ORF-VD1 disruption in the masculinization process, one would need to look for paternally transmitted mt genomes containing a complete F-ORF-VD1. The data available to date, however, show that F-ORF-VD1 is eventually lost in “Standard Male” genomes, reinforcing the hypothesis that this gene has an F genome-specific function.

Although speculative, we propose that F-ORF-VD1 has been maintained in mytilid mitochondrial CRs to participate in the regulation of mt transmission and/or the regulation of F genome replication and transcription. This hypothesis is consistent with the recent suggestions that the RM-type genome sequenced for Mytilus trossulus, which was inferred to be a recently masculinized genome because of its extraction from a male gonad [30], would be in fact the F genome of M. trossulus [40], [83]. This particular genome indeed contains a complete F-ORF-VD1, which is consistent with the hypothesis of maternal transmission. However, further data collection and analyses will be essential to clarify the functional role of this putative F-specific protein and to elucidate the mechanisms of mt genome-specific mtDNA transmission in bivalve species with DUI.

Conclusion

A fundamental question regarding doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA in bivalves is whether there are F- and/or M-specific mtDNA sequences that control the mode of inheritance of the mitochondrial genomes. Our results demonstrate that there is a systematic difference between maternally and paternally transmitted mytilid genomes: a fourteenth mtDNA-encoded protein, i.e., F-ORF-VD1, is likely present in the former but absent in the latter. Interestingly, this putative additional protein has been found in the first variable domain VD1 of the mitochondrial control region, which is the portion of the CR that was previously suspected to contain the elements responsible for the differing modes of mt transmission in DUI-containing bivalves [39], [40]. We present multiple lines of evidence suggesting that a functional protein is coded for by F-ORF-VD1: (i) the gene region has been maintained in the Mytilus lineage (subfamily Mytilinae) for at least 13 million years and our results suggest that a mytiline F-ORF homologue is present in Musculista senhousia (subfamily Crenellinae), (ii) the gene region has been classified as coding by testcode and Glimmer analyses, (iii) the gene region is actively transcribed in Mytilus, (iv) the putative protein's secondary structure has been conserved, (v) the putative protein's amino acid composition are relatively similar and (vi) the gene region's Ka/Ks ratios indicate relaxed purifying selection, which would not be expected for a non-protein coding sequence. Although it is admittedly speculative, we propose that F-ORF-VD1 is essential for the maternal transmission of the F mitochondrial genome in mytilid mussels. Despite the fact that the function(s) of the F-ORF-VD1 protein remains to be determined, our findings suggest that the functional repertoire of animal mitochondrial genomes is greater than previously thought and that novel mitochondrial ORFs, with key biological functions, await discovery in other animal groups.

Materials and Methods

Complete mitochondrial genome sequences used in this study are listed in Table 1. Complete F- and M-type CR sequences of M. californianus (AF090831 [55]; AY515226-27 and EU826123-24 [40]) and the F-type CR sequence of M. coruscus (AF315574; Barna and Showman unpublished) have also been used. Because the complete M. trossulus F and M mt genomes sequenced by Zbawicka et al. [96] are introgressed mtDNAs from M. edulis, we used the genomes more recently sequenced by Zbawicka et al. [97] as the “ancestral M. trossulus” F and M mtDNAs.

Examination of ORFs was performed with ORF Finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gorf/) using the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code. Sequence similarity searches were performed in GenBank using BLASTX and PSI-BLAST [87] against the following databases on September 2010 (GenBank release 179.0): (i) non-redundant protein sequences, (ii) SWISSPROT (SWISSPROT release 2010_09), (iii) protein data bank and (iv) environmental samples. We also performed sequence similarity searches using BLASTN against expressed sequence tags (EST others) [98]. T-COFFEE version 8.93 [99] was used to align amino acid sequences and aa alignments were used as a template to align the corresponding codons. Graphical presentation of conserved positions in the alignment was done using Jalview [100].

The coding potential of ORFs was examined using Fickett's testcode algorithm [52] and Glimmer 3 [53]. Transmembrane helices as well as other ORF features of were characterized using HMMTOP [101], TMpred [102] and PredictProtein [103]. Hydropathy profiles were calculated using the method of Kyte and Doolittle [104]. Protein structure and function predictions were made using I-TASSER, a state-of the-art hierarchical protein structure modeling approach that is based on the secondary-structure enhanced profile-profile threading alignment [105], [106]. Amino acid composition for chemically equivalent amino acids was obtained following Taylor [107]: acidic amino acids (D and E); aromatic (H, F, W and Y); basic (R, H, and K); charged (R, D, E, H and K); hydrophilic (D, E, K, N, Q and R); hydrophobic (A, C, F, I, L, M, V, W and Y); neutral (G, Q, H, S and T); non-polar (A, C, G, I, L, M, F, P, V, W and Y); and polar (R, N, D, E, Q, H, K, S and T).

MEGA 4.0 [108] was used to estimate nucleotide and amino acid divergences among putative ORFs. The number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (Ks) and the number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (Ka) for the entire F-orf-vd1 sequences within and between Mytilus spp. were also calculated using MEGA 4.0. Site-specific selection, i.e. the estimation of Ka/Ks ratios at each codon site, was studied with the SELECTON server 2.4 (http://selecton.tau.ac.il/index.html) using a Bayesian inference approach [81]. Specifically, the analysis was performed by means of a comparison between a null model assuming no positive selection (M8a; [109]) and a model that allows positive selection (MEC, which treats amino-acid replacements differently by allowing a position with radical replacements to obtain higher Ka value than a position with more moderate replacement; [110]). As data sources we used the codon-aligned partial cox1 and complete F-orf-vd1 Mytilus spp. sequences (M. senhousia was excluded due to alignment issues) and the inferred ML phylogenetic tree. For our models (MEC vs. M8a), likelihood was tested by Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) score comparison [111]. The MEC model is considered the more justified if its AICc score is lower than the score of the alternative model. For each position, a confidence interval defined by the 5th and 95th percentiles of the posterior distributions inferred for the position was estimated. For positions with an inferred Ka/Ks>1, the inference of positive selection is considered reliable when the lower bound of the confidence interval is larger than 1.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Examples of M- ORF-VD1 sequences in GenBank.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.s001

(DOC)

Figure S2.

Full length and Truncated F- ORF-VD1 in GenBank.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.s002

(DOC)

Figure S3.

Full alignment and Bayesian Ka/Ks ratios obtain from the MEC model – “SELECTON analysis”.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.s003

(DOC)

Figure S4.

(A) Comparisons of Mytilus edulis F-ORF-VD1 and Venustaconcha ellipsiformis F-ORF hydropathy profiles. Profiles were calculated by the method of Kyte and Doolittle [104]. Numbers below profiles designate amino acid positions in each protein. Predicted transmembrane domains according to TMpred [102] are shown in light gray. (B) Alignment of the translated F-orf-vd1 M. edulis and F-orf V. ellipsiformis sequences. Identical amino acids are highlighted in black. Chemically equivalent amino acids are in gray. Dashes (–) denote a missing residue at this position in comparison with other sequence(s). (C) Overall amino acid composition (left) and composition of chemically equivalent amino acids (right) of Mytilus spp. F-ORF-VD1, M. senhousia F-ORF and V. ellipsiformis F-ORF protein sequences. Amino acid composition is reported as percentage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019365.s004

(TIF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SB WRH. Performed the experiments: FG LM MP. Analyzed the data: SB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FG LM MP WRH. Wrote the paper: SB FG MP DTS WRH. Discussed the data: SB FG MP DTS WRH.

References

  1. 1. Birky CW Jr (2001) The inheritance of genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts: Laws, mechanisms, and models. Annu Rev Genet 35: 125–148.
  2. 2. Elson JL, Lightowlers RN (2006) Mitochondrial DNA clonality in the dock: can surveillance swing the case? Trends Genet 22: 603–607.
  3. 3. Gissi C, Iannelli F, Pesole G (2008) Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity 101: 301–320.
  4. 4. Boore JL (1999) Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucl Acids Res 27: 1767–1780.
  5. 5. Garesse R, Vallejo CG (2001) Animal mitochondrial biogenesis and function: a regulatory cross-talk between two genomes. Gene 263: 1–16.
  6. 6. Saccone C, Attimonelli M, Sbisà E (1987) Structural elements highly preserved during the evolution of the D-loop-containing region in vertebrate mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 26: 205–211.
  7. 7. Endo K, Noguchi Y, Ueshima R, Jacobs HT (2005) Novel repetitive structures, deviant protein-encoding sequences and unidentified ORFs in the mitochondrial genome of the brachiopod Lingula anatine. J M Evol 61: 36–53.
  8. 8. Shao Z, Shannon G, Chaga OY, Lavrov DV (2006) Mitochondrial genome of the moon jelly Aurelia aurita (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa): A linear DNA molecule encoding a putative DNA-dependant DNA polymerase. Gene 381: 92–101.
  9. 9. Cameron SL, Johnson KP, Whiting MF (2007) The mitochondrial genome of the screamer louse Bothriometopus (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera): Effects of extensive gene rearrangements on the evolution of the genome. J Mol Evol 65: 589–604.
  10. 10. Flot J-F, Tillier A (2007) The mitochondrial genomes of Pocillopora (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) contains two variable regions: The putative D-loop and a novel ORF of unknown function. Gene 401: 80–87.
  11. 11. Breton S, Doucet-Beaupré H, Stewart DT, Piontkivska H, Karmakar M, et al. (2009) Comparative mitochondrial genomics of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) with Doubly Uniparental Inheritance of mtDNA: gender-specific Open Reading Frames (ORFs) and putative origins of replication. Genetics 183: 1575–1589.
  12. 12. Wilson GA, Bertrand N, Patel Y, Hughes JB, Feil EJ, et al. (2005) Orphans as taxonomically restricted and ecologically important genes. Microbiology 151: 2499–2501.
  13. 13. Khalturin K, Anton-Erxleben F, Sassmann S, Wittlieb J, Hemmrich G, et al. (2008) A novel gene family controls species-specific morphological traits in Hydra. PLoS Biol 6: e278.
  14. 14. Khalturin K, Hemmrich G, Fraune S, Augustin R, Bosch TCG (2009) More than just orphans: are taxonomically-restricted genes important in evolution? Trends Genet 25: 404–413.
  15. 15. Monchois V, Abergel C, Sturgis J, Jeudy S, Claverie J-M (2001) Escherichia coli ykfE ORFan gene encodes a potent inhibitor of C-type lysozyme. J Biol Chem 276: 18437–18441.
  16. 16. Chase CD (2007) Cytoplasmic male sterility: a window to the world of plant mitochondrial-nuclear interactions. Trends Genet 23: 81–90.
  17. 17. Breton S, Stewart DT, Shepardson S, Trdan RJ, Bogan AE, et al. (2010) Novel protein genes in animal mtDNA: a new sex determination system in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida)? Mol Biol Evol..
  18. 18. Breton S, Doucet-Beaupré H, Stewart DT, Hoeh WR, Blier PU (2007) The unusual system of doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA: isn't one enough? Trends Genet 23: 465–474.
  19. 19. Passamonti M, Ghiselli F (2009) Doubly Uniparental Inheritance: two mitochondrial genomes, one precious model for organelle DNA inheritance and evolution. DNA and Cell Biol 28: 1–12.
  20. 20. Skibinski DOF, Gallagher C, Beynon CM (1994) Mitochondrial DNA inheritance. Nature 368: 817–818.
  21. 21. Skibinski DOF, Gallagher C, Beynon CM (1994) Sex-limited mitochondrial DNA transmission in the marine mussel Mytilus edulis. Genetics 138: 801–809.
  22. 22. Zouros E, Ball AO, Saavedra C, Freeman KR (1994) Mitochondrial DNA inheritance. Nature 368: 818.
  23. 23. Zouros E, Ball AO, Saavedra C, Freeman KR (1994) An unusual type of mitochondrial inheritance in the blue mussel Mytilus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 7463–7467.
  24. 24. Obata M, Kamiya C, Kawamura K, Komaru A (2006) Sperm mitochondrial DNA transmission to both male and female offspring in the blue mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Dev Growth Differ 48: 253–261.
  25. 25. Obata M, Sano N, Kawamura K, Komaru A (2007) Inheritance of two M type mitochondrial DNA from sperm and unfertilized eggs to offspring in Mytilus galloprovincialis. Dev Growth Differ 49: 335–344.
  26. 26. Dalziel AC, Stewart DT (2002) Tissue-specific expression of male-transmitted mitochondrial DNA and its implications for rates of molecular evolution in Mytilus mussels (Bivalvia: Mytilidae). Genome 45: 348–355.
  27. 27. Venetis C, Theologidis I, Zouros E, Rodakis GC (2006) No evidence for presence of maternal mitochondrial DNA in the sperm of Mytilus galloprovincialis males. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 273: 2483–2489.
  28. 28. Ghiselli F, Milani L, Passamonti M (2011) Strict sex-specific mtDNA segregation in the germline of the DUI species Venerupis philippinarum (Bivalvia Veneridae). Mol Biol Evol 28: 949–961.
  29. 29. Mizi A, Zouros E, Moschonas N, Rodakis GC (2005) The complete maternal and paternal mitochondrial genomes of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis: Implications for the doubly uniparental inheritances mode of mtDNA. Mol Biol Evol 22: 952–967.
  30. 30. Breton S, Burger G, Stewart DT, Blier PU (2006) Comparative analysis of gender-associated complete mitochondrial genomes in marine mussels (Mytilus spp.). Genetics 172: 1107–1119.
  31. 31. Doucet-Beaupré H, Breton S, Chapman EG, Blier PU, Bogan AE, et al. (2010) Mitochondrial phylogenomics of the Bivalvia (Mollusca): Searching for the origin and mitogenomic correlates of doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA. BMC Evol Biol 10: 50.
  32. 32. Curole JP, Kocher TD (2002) Ancient sex-specific extension of the cytochrome c oxidase II gene in bivalves and the fidelity of doubly-uniparental inheritance. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1323–1328.
  33. 33. Curole JP, Kocher TD (2005) Evolution of a unique mitotype-specific protein-coding extension of the cytochrome c oxidase II gene in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida). J Mol Evol 61: 381–389.
  34. 34. Chakrabarti R, Walker JM, Stewart DT, Trdan RJ, Vijayaraghavan S, et al. (2006) Presence of a unique male-specific extension of C-terminus to the cytochrome c oxidase subunit II protein coded by the male-transmitted mitochondrial genome of Venustaconcha ellipsiformis (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). FEBS Lett 580: 862–866.
  35. 35. Chakrabarti R, Walker JM, Chapman EG, Shepardson SP, Trdan RJ, et al. (2007) Reproductive function for a C-terminus extended, male-transmitted cytochrome c oxidase subunit II protein expressed in both spermatozoa and eggs. FEBS Lett 581: 5213–5219.
  36. 36. Chapman EG, Piontkivska H, Walker JM, Stewart DT, Curole JP, et al. (2008) Extreme primary and secondary protein structure variability in the chimeric male-transmitted cytochrome c oxidase subunit II protein in freshwater mussels: evidence for an elevated amino acid substitution rate in the face of domain-specific purifying selection. BMC Evol Biol 8: 165–181.
  37. 37. Cao L, Kenchington E, Zouros E (2004) Differential segregation patterns of sperm mitochondria in embryos of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Genetics 166: 883–894.
  38. 38. Cogswell AT, Kenchington EL, Zouros E (2006) Segregation of sperm mitochondria in two- and four-cell embryos of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis: Implications for the mechanism of doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA. Genome 49: 799–807.
  39. 39. Cao L, Kenchington E, Zouros E, Rodakis GC (2004) Evidence that the large noncoding sequence is the main control region of maternally and paternally transmitted mitochondrial genomes of the marine mussel (Mytilus spp.). Genetics 167: 835–850.
  40. 40. Cao L, Ort BS, Mizi A, Pogson G, Kenchington E, et al. (2009) The control region of maternally and paternally inherited mitochondrial genomes of three species of the sea mussel genus Mytilus. Genetics 181: 1045–1056.
  41. 41. Burzyński A, Smietanka B (2009) Is interlineage recombination responsible for low divergence of mitochondrial nad3 genes in Mytilus galloprovincialis? Mol Biol Evol 26: 1441–1445.
  42. 42. Hoeh WR, Stewart DT, Saavedra C, Sutherland BW, Zouros E (1997) Phylogenetic evidence for role-reversals of gender-associated mitochondrial DNA in Mytilus (Bivalvia: Mytilidae). Mol Biol Evol 14: 959–967.
  43. 43. Zouros E (2000) The exceptional mitochondrial DNA system of the mussel family Mytilidae. Genes Genet Syst 75: 313–318.
  44. 44. Stewart DT, Breton S, Blier PU, Hoeh WR (2009) Masculinization events and doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA: A model for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of gender-asssociated mtDNA in mussels. In: Pontarotti P, editor. Evolutionary Biology from Concept to Application II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 163–173.
  45. 45. Burzyński A, Zbawizka M, Skibinski DO, Wenne R (2003) Evidence for recombination of mtDNA in the marine mussel Mytilus trossulus from the Baltic. Mol Biol Evol 20: 388–392.
  46. 46. Burzyński A, Zbawizka M, Skibinski DO, Wenne R (2006) Doubly uniparental inheritance is associated with high polymorphism for rearranged and recombinant control region haplotypes in Baltic Mytilus trossulus. Genetics 174: 1081–1094.
  47. 47. Venetis C, Theologidis I, Zouros E, Rodakis GC (2007) A mitochondrial genome with a reversed transmission route in the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Gene 406: 79–90.
  48. 48. Theologidis I, Saavedra C, Zouros E (2007) No evidence for absence of paternal mtDNA in male progeny from pair matings of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Genetics 176: 1367–1369.
  49. 49. Ort BS, Pogson GH (2007) Molecular population genetics of the male and female mtDNA molecules of the California sea mussel, Mytilus californianus. Genetics 177: 1087–1099.
  50. 50. Chichvarkhin A, Kartavtsev I, Kafanov AI (2000) Genetic connections between some species of Mytilidae (Mollusca : Bivalvia) from the northern part of the Pacific ocean. Genetika 36: 1206–1220.
  51. 51. Passamonti M (2007) An unusual case of gender-associated mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy: the mytilid Musculista senhousia (Mollusca Bivalvia). BMC Evol Biol 7: S7.
  52. 52. Fickett JW (1982) Recognition of protein coding regions in DNA sequences. Nucl Acids Res 10: 5303–5318.
  53. 53. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL (2007) Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23: 673–679.
  54. 54. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL (1999) Improved microbial gene identification with Glimmer. Nucl Acids Res 27: 4636–4641.
  55. 55. Beagley CT, Okimoto R, Wolstenholme DR (1999) Mytilus mitochondrial DNA contains a functional gene for a tRNASer (UCN) with a dihydrouridine arm-replacement loop and a pseudo- tRNASer (UCN) gene. Genetics 152: 641–652.
  56. 56. Rawson PD (2005) Nonhomologous recombination between the large unassigned region of the male and female mitochondrial genomes in the mussel, Mytilis trossulus. J Mol Evol 61: 717–732.
  57. 57. Filipowicz M, Burzyński A, Smietanka B, Wenne R (2008) Recombination in mitochondrial DNA of European mussels Mytilus. J Mol Evol 67: 377–388.
  58. 58. Skibinski DOF, Edwards CA (1987) Mitochondrial DNA variation in marine mussels (Mytilus). In: Tiews K, editor. Proceedings of the world symposium on selection, hybridization and genetic engineering in aquacultures I. Berlin: Heeneman. pp. 209–226.
  59. 59. Hoffmann RJ, Boore JL, Brown WM (1992) A novel mitochondrial genome organization for the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Genetics 131: 397–412.
  60. 60. Boore JL, Medina M, Rosenberg LA (2004) Complete sequences of the highly rearranged molluscan mitochondrial genomes of the scaphopod Graptacme eborea and the bivalve Mytilus edulis. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1492–1503.
  61. 61. Breton S, Stewart DT, Hoeh WR (2010) Characterization of a mitochondrial ORF from the gender-associated mtDNAs of Mytilus spp. (Bivalvia: Mytilidae): identification of the “missing” ATPase 8 gene. Marine Genomics 3: 11–18.
  62. 62. Gracey AY, Chaney ML, Boomhower JP, Tyburczy WR, Connor K, et al. (2008) Rhythms of gene expression in a fluctuating intertidal environment. Curr Biol 18: 1501–1507.
  63. 63. Tanguy A, Bierne N, Saavedra C, Pina B, Bache're E, et al. (2008) Increasing genomic information in bivalves through new EST collections in four species: development of new genetic markers for environmental studies and genome evolution. Gene 408: 27–36.
  64. 64. Venier P, Pallavicini A, De Nardi B, Lanfranchi G (2003) Towards a catalogue of genes transcribed in multiple tissues of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Gene 314: 29–40.
  65. 65. Venier P, De Pittà C, Pallavicini A, Marsano F, Varotto L, et al. (2006) Development of mussel mRNA profiling: can gene expression trends reveal coastal water pollution? Mutation Res 602: 121–134.
  66. 66. Venier P, De Pittà C, Bernante F, Varotto L, De Nardi B, et al. (2009) MytiBase: a knowledgebase of mussel (M. galloprovincialis) transcribed sequences. BMC Genomics 10: 72.
  67. 67. Curole JP, Meyer E, Manahan DT, Hedgecock D (2010) Unequal and genotype-dependent expression of mitochondrial genes in larvae of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Biol Bull 218: 122–131.
  68. 68. Ojala D, Crews S, Montoya J, Gelfand R, Attardi G (1981) A small polyadenylated RNA (7S RNA), containing a putative ribosome attachment site, maps near the origin of human mitochondrial DNA replication. J Mol Biol 150: 303–314.
  69. 69. Nakamachi N, Rhoads DD, Hayashi J-I, Kagawa Y, Matsumura T (1998) Detection, localization and sequence analyses of mitochondrial regulatory region RNAs in several mammalian species. J Biochem 123: 392–398.
  70. 70. Slomovic S, Laufer D, Geiger D, Schuster G (2005) Polyadenylation and degradation of human mitochondrial RNA: the prokaryotic past leaves its mark. Mol Cell Biol 25: 6427–6435.
  71. 71. Sbisa E, Nardelli M, Tanzariello F, Tullo A, Saccone C (1990) Transcript Mapping of Ascidian mtDNA With EST Data The complete and symmetric transcription of the main non coding region of rat mitochondrial genome: In vivo mapping of heavy and light transcripts. Curr Genet 17: 247–253.
  72. 72. Sbisa E, Tullo A, Nardelli M, Tanzariello F, Saccone C (1992) Transcription mapping of the Ori L region reveals novel precursors of mature RNA species and antisense RNAs in rat mitochondrial genome. FEBS Lett 296: 311–316.
  73. 73. Nakamichi N, Ito M, Maeda T, Matsumura T (2000) Detection and cDNA cloning of H-strand mitochondrial regulatory region RNAs in cultured human cells and human tissues. Cytotechnology 33: 175–188.
  74. 74. Plazzi F, Passamonti M (2010) Towards a molecular phylogeny of Mollusks: bivalves' early evolution as revealed by mitochondrial genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 57: 641–657.
  75. 75. Echols N, Harrison P, Balasubramanian S, Luscombe NM, Bertone P, et al. (2002) Comprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenes. Nucl Acids Res 30: 2515–2523.
  76. 76. Singer GAC, Hickey DA (2000) Nucleotide bias causes a genomewide bias in the amino acid composition of proteins. Mol Biol Evol 17: 1581–1588.
  77. 77. Schmitz J, Ohme M, Zischler H (2002) The complete mitochondrial sequence of Tarsius bancanus: evidence for an extensive nucleotide compositional plasticity of primate mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol 19: 544–553.
  78. 78. Hasegawa M, Cao Y, Yang Z (1998) Preponderance of slightly deleterious polymorphisms in mitochondrial DNA: nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio is much higher within species than between species. Mol Biol Evol 15: 1499–1505.
  79. 79. Rand DM, Kann LM (1998) Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 102/ 103: 393–407.
  80. 80. Oliveira DCSG, Raychoudhury R, Lavrov DV, Werren JH (2008) Rapidly evolving mitochondrial genome and directional selection in mitochondrial genes in the parasitic wasp Nasonia (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Mol Biol Evol 25: 2167–2180.
  81. 81. Stern A, Doron-Faigenboi A, Erez E, Martz E, Bacharach E, et al. (2007) Selecton: advanced models for detecting positive and purifying selection using a Bayesian inference approach. Nucl Acids Res 35: W506–W511.
  82. 82. Meiklejohn CD, Montooth KL, Rand DM (2007) Positive and negative selection on the mitochondrial genome. Trends Genet 23: 259–263.
  83. 83. Smietanka B, Burzyński A, Wenne R (2010) Comparative genomics of marine mussels (Mytilus spp.) gender associated mtDNA: rapidly evolving atp8. J Mol Evol 71: 385–400.
  84. 84. Lane N (2009) On the origin of bar codes. Nature 462: 272–274.
  85. 85. Hoeh WR, Stewart DT, Guttman SI (2002) High fidelity of mitochondrial genome transmission under the doubly uniparental mode of inheritance in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Evolution 56: 2252–22561.
  86. 86. Theologidis I, Fodelianakis S, Gaspar MB, Zouros E (2008) Doubly uniparental inheritance (DUI) of mitochondrial DNA in Donax trunculus (Bivalvia: Donacidae) and the problem of its sporadic detection in Bivalvia. Evolution 62: 959–970.
  87. 87. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Scäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 25: 3389–3402.
  88. 88. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucl Acids Res 28: 235–242.
  89. 89. Burger G, Gray MW, Lang FB (2003) Mitochondrial genomes: anything goes. Trends Genet 19: 709–716.
  90. 90. Koonin EV (1993) A common set of conserved motifs in a vast variety of putative nucleic acid-dependent ATPases including MCM proteins involved in the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication. Nucl Acids Res 21: 2541–2547.
  91. 91. Pritchard AE, Seilhamer JJ, Cummings DJ (1986) Paramecium mitochondrial DNA sequences and RNA transcripts for cytochrome oxidase subunit I, URF1, and three ORFs adjacent to the replication origin. Gene 44: 243–253.
  92. 92. Pont-Kingdon GA, Okada NA, Macfarlane JL, Beagley CT, Watkins-Sims CD, et al. (1995) A coral mitochondrial MutS gene. Nature 375: 109–111.
  93. 93. Pont-Kingdon GA, Okada NA, Macfarlane JL, Beagley CT, Watkins-Sims CD, et al. (1998) Mitochondrial DNA of the coral Sarcophyton glaucum contains a gene for a homologue of bacterial MutS: a possible case of gene transfer from the nucleus to the mitochondrion. J Mol Evol 46: 419–431.
  94. 94. Burger G, Lang FB, Braun HP, Marx S (2003) The enigmatic mitochondrial ORF ymf39 codes for ATP synthase chain b. Nucl Acids Res 31: 2353–2360.
  95. 95. Longo FJ, Dornfeld EJ (1967) The fine structure of spermatid differentiation in the mussel, Mytilus edulis. J Ultrastruct Res 20: 462–480.
  96. 96. Zbawicka M, Burzyński A, Wenne R (2007) Complete sequences of mitochondrial genomes from the Baltic mussel Mytilus trossulus. Gene 406: 191–198.
  97. 97. Zbawicka M, Burzyński A, Skibinski D, Wenne R (2010) Scottish Mytilus trossulus mussels retain ancestral mitochondrial DNA: complete sequences of male and female mtDNA genomes. Gene 456: 45–53.
  98. 98. Benson D, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman D, Ostell J, Wheeler D (2004) GenBank: update. Nucl Acids Res 32: D23–D26.
  99. 99. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J (2000) T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302: 205–217.
  100. 100. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clam M, Barton GJ (2009) Jalview version 2 – a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25: 1189–1191.
  101. 101. Tusnády GE, Simon I (2001) The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics 17: 849–850.
  102. 102. Hoffmann K, Stoffel W (1993) TMpred. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 374: 166.
  103. 103. Rost B, Yachdav G, Liu J (2004) The PredictProtein Server. Nucl Acids Res 32: W321–W326.
  104. 104. Kyte J, Doolittle RF (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157: 105–132.
  105. 105. Wu S, Skolnick J, Zhang Y (2007) Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biology 5: 17.
  106. 106. Zhang Y (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 40.
  107. 107. Taylor WR (1986) The classification of amino acid conservation. J Theor Biol 119: 205–218.
  108. 108. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596–1599.
  109. 109. Swanson WJ, Nielsen R, Yang Q (2003) Pervasive adaptive evolution in mammalian fertilization proteins. Mol Biol Evol 20: 18–20.
  110. 110. Doron-Faigenboim A, Pupko T (2007) A combined empirical and mechanistic codon model. Mol Biol Evol 24: 388–397.
  111. 111. Akaike H (1974) New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat Contr Ac19: 716–723.