Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Selective Loss of Cysteine Residues and Disulphide Bonds in a Potato Proteinase Inhibitor II Family

  • Xiu-Qing Li ,

    xiu-qing.li@agr.gc.ca

    Affiliation Potato Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Fredericton, Canada

  • Tieling Zhang,

    Affiliations Potato Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Fredericton, Canada, Department of Plant Science, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada

  • Danielle Donnelly

    Affiliation Department of Plant Science, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada

Selective Loss of Cysteine Residues and Disulphide Bonds in a Potato Proteinase Inhibitor II Family

  • Xiu-Qing Li, 
  • Tieling Zhang, 
  • Danielle Donnelly
PLOS
x

Abstract

Disulphide bonds between cysteine residues in proteins play a key role in protein folding, stability, and function. Loss of a disulphide bond is often associated with functional differentiation of the protein. The evolution of disulphide bonds is still actively debated; analysis of naturally occurring variants can promote understanding of the protein evolutionary process. One of the disulphide bond-containing protein families is the potato proteinase inhibitor II (PI-II, or Pin2, for short) superfamily, which is found in most solanaceous plants and participates in plant development, stress response, and defence. Each PI-II domain contains eight cysteine residues (8C), and two similar PI-II domains form a functional protein that has eight disulphide bonds and two non-identical reaction centres. It is still unclear which patterns and processes affect cysteine residue loss in PI-II. Through cDNA sequencing and data mining, we found six natural variants missing cysteine residues involved in one or two disulphide bonds at the first reaction centre. We named these variants Pi7C and Pi6C for the proteins missing one or two pairs of cysteine residues, respectively. This PI-II-7C/6C family was found exclusively in potato. The missing cysteine residues were in bonding pairs but distant from one another at the nucleotide/protein sequence level. The non-synonymous/synonymous substitution (Ka/Ks) ratio analysis suggested a positive evolutionary gene selection for Pi6C and various Pi7C. The selective deletion of the first reaction centre cysteine residues that are structure-level-paired but sequence-level-distant in PI-II illustrates the flexibility of PI-II domains and suggests the functionality of their transient gene versions during evolution.

Introduction

Many enzymes and proteins such as members of the potato proteinase inhibitor II superfamily have disulphide bonds (disulphide bridge, SS-bond) formed between the thiol groups of cysteine residues. Although the amino acid residue methionine also contains sulphur, methionine cannot form disulphide bonds. The disulphide bond, usually formed between different regions or peptides, is relatively strong. Its typical bond dissociation energy is 60 kcal/mole. This is approximately 71% of the strength of a typical peptide backbone carbon-carbon bond (dissociation energy of 83–85 kcal/mole). Disulphides perform diverse functions in proteins, from maintaining the folding and stability of proteins to preserving bioactive structure essential to specific protein function [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].

Analysis of naturally occurring variants can reveal insights into the natural selection and evolution of disulphide bond-containing proteins. Disulphide bonds were thought to be generally very well conserved in proteins [6]. However, a recent large scale analysis on structural features in homologous protein domain families of known 3-D structures reported that only 54% of disulphide bonds compared between homologous pairs are conserved [7]. The same study also found that the elimination of a disulphide in a homologue need not always result in more stable interactions between equivalent residues, and about 35% of the poorly conserved disulphides show gaps in their alignment [7]. The non-conserved disulphides have variable structural features that were thought to be associated with differentiation or specialisation of protein function [7].

In globular proteins, there is a strong preference for relatively shorter connections; the average separation for cysteine residues within a disulphide bond is 15 residues [6]. The loss of a disulphide bond in a globular protein is sometimes from losing both [6], or only one, of the two cysteine residues [8]. In an antithrombin deficiency family, the disruption of a disulphide bond due to the loss of a cysteine residue left a free cysteine residue and an unconstrained C-terminus [8].

After the loss of a cysteine residue, a new pairing can sometimes occur between the remaining cysteine residues in the protein. For example, a mutated anti-Mullerian hormone type II (AMHRII) receptor gene encoding a protein lacking one of the cysteine residues leads to persistent Mullerian duct syndrome in human males [9]. In the wild type protein, the C5 cysteine residue forms a bridge with the C8 cysteine residue. However, AMHRII contains no C8 cysteine residue. Instead, its C5 cysteine residue is predicted to form a disulphide bridge with a C (non-exist in other similar proteins analyzed) that is directly adjacent to C3 [9].

Behe and Snoke [10] proposed models for simulating evolution of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues such as the case of disulphide bonds using a conceptually simplest route-point mutation system in duplicated genes. These authors consider a situation in which the intermediate steps to a new protein are neutral and involve non-functional products. This view was challenged by Lynch [11] who proposed a neofunctionalization model assuming that the intermediate step towards a two-residue adaptation is non-debilitating with respect to the original function and effectively neutral. Clearly, protein evolution involving disulphide bonds is still actively debated, and illustrations of natural variants can promote understanding of natural selection and evolutionary process(es) of genes encoding disulphide bond-containing proteins.

One of the disulphide bond-containing protein families is the potato proteinase inhibitor type II (PI-II, or Pin2, for short) superfamily, which is found in most solanaceous plants and participates in plant development, wound response, and defence [12]. Each PI-II domain, or repeat at the primary sequence level, contains eight cysteine residues (8C), and two domains (usually non-identical) forming a functional proteinase inhibitor II protein with eight disulphide bonds [13], [14]. The sequence of the PI-II repeats is quite variable; only the eight cysteine residues involved in the disulphide bonds and a single proline residue are strictly conserved in each domain in different type II proteinase inhibitors identified in solanaceous species (http://www.sanger.ac.uk//cgi-bin/Pfam/getacc?PF02428). The proper folding is important to the proteinase inhibition activity [15]. Each eight-cysteine-residue sequence region was usually termed a domain, but amino acid sequences of the domain are different. The functional protein needs two such non-identical domains to fold together to form the eight disulphide bonds and the two reaction centres. PI-II belongs to one of ten recognized types of plant proteinase inhibitors [16].

The PI-II protein has a double-head-like structure with one reaction centre at each head [13], [17]. Each head mainly consists of five amino acids in an array at the primary sequence level [15], [18]. This array has two conserved cysteine residues with three amino acid residues between them. These two conserved cysteine residues pair with the two counterpart cysteine residues in another domain to form two disulphide bonds. However, the three internal amino acid residues can be modified through genetic engineering. In Nicotina alata, artificial deletion of two disulphide bonds reveals that one of the bonds is essential for protein binding to trypsin while the other bond markedly decreases the timescale of motion [19].

The primary sequence-level domains of the PI-II peptide interact to form double-headed proteins although the two primary domains can be encoded from two discontinuous parts of the gene [13], [15], [17], [20]. This is different from the relatively well studied globular proteins [6]. In PI-II, there are several unknown features, including the pattern by which disulphide bond partners may lose cysteine residues at the reaction centres, and whether this loss was random or selective. Furthermore, it is not known whether the intermediate versions were functional during this evolutionary process.

The two cysteine residues of the five amino acid residue array at each of the two reaction centres are apparently essential as they are always present in reported natural variants [15]. The three amino acid residues between the two cysteine residues often differ between homologs; this is important for both function and specificity [15]. The amino acid sequence of the first reaction centre in potato PI-II is “CTLEC”, and the second reaction centre is “CPRNC”. Transcript sequence information for solanaceous plants has increased rapidly due to new developments in DNA sequencing. This increases the possibility of finding new variants of PI-II.

We have previously reported the constitutive expression of a PI-II superfamily gene (cDNA C463) cloned from potatoes [21]. Now, in the current study, we found that one of eight cysteine residue pairs is missing in the predicted protein encoded by C463, and further bioinformatic analysis of all available potato gene sequences led to the identification of PI-II potato genes with one or two cysteine residue pairs missing in their encoded proteins. We named these genes Pi7C and Pi6C, and their encoded proteins Pi7C and Pi6C (for the missing one or two pairs of cysteine residues, respectively). Here, we report on these Pi7C and Pi6C genes, describe the PI-II domain flexibility, and investigate the evolutionary selection process that lead to the emergence of these two genes.

Results

cDNA cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of Pi7C

The DNA sequence of the cDNA clone C463 (Pi7Ca, GenBank accession EF469204) from the diploid potato clone (DC) 11379-03 showed 88% identity (BLASTn Expect = 3e-38) in March 2007 to the tomato auxin-induced proteinase inhibitor type II gene (ARPI TR8, gi|408007 for genomic DNA, and gi|405581 for mRNA) [22], [23]. However, this C463 DNA sequence did not show significant similarity to any known potato genes in BLASTn and BLASTX searches in March 2007, not even to the known PI-II gene of potato [20]. Only one potato mRNA (gb|EU368949.1) was found in BLASTn GenBank Nucleotide Collection (nr/nt) on December 24, 2010 (99% identity, Expect = 0.0). A BLASTp search using the known potato PI-II (ABR29625) detected C463 Pi7Ca as a distant (Identities = 66/159, 42%) but significantly similar (Expect = 2e-23) protein on December 24, 2010.

The cDNA clone C463 contained a full length open reading frame. The mRNA-encoded peptide was 152 amino acids long. Both its starting (NH2-terminal) and ending (COOH-terminal) regions were similar to the ARPI protein, but the internal region was quite different from ARPI with an identity of 92% (24 aa), 66% (101 aa), and 93% (27 aa) for the leader, middle, and tail regions, respectively. In PSI- and PHI-BLAST analysis, the amino acid sequence (152 aa) showed two proteinase inhibitor-II domains at the primary sequence level with similarity to the tomato ARPI peptide (Q43710.1, Identities = 107/154 (70%), Expect = 9e-45, on December 24, 2010) and PI-II from several Nicotiana species with the greatest to N. cavicola PI-II gb|ABA42891.1 (56% identity, Expect = 5e-4, on December 24, 2010). The first 24 or 22 amino acids of the Pi7Ca-encoded product were nearly identical to the signal peptide of ARPI targeting signal peptide with differences only in three amino acids. The similarity analysis on both the DNA sequence and the decoded-protein sequence suggested that the C463 clone is in the family of a type II proteinase inhibitor. For this reason, the cDNA C463's identified gene from the DC was called Pi7Ca.

BLAST search against the non-human EST databases in GenBank identified 62 highly similar ESTs of potato, mainly from S. tuberosum ‘Shepody’ [24], ‘Kennebec’, and ‘Bintje’ (http://jcvi.org/potato/) in March 2007. Four different sequences (Pi7Ca, Pi7Cb, Pi7Cc, and Pi7Cd) of Pi7C, each encoding a 152-amino-acid peptide, were identified. An updated BLASTp search added another member (gi|165906348) (named, Pi7Ce) on December 24, 2010. Pi7Ca was from the DC, Pi7Cb and Pi7Cc from ‘Shepody’, Pi7Cd from ‘Kennebec’, and Pi7Ce from ‘Zhongshu No. 3’. They all encoded two domains. The tomato PI-II (ARPI) has three PI-II domains. Therefore, all the potato Pi7C proteins are different from the tomato PI-II in having one fewer domain. The amino acid sequence alignment showing the cysteine residue deletion on the two domains is shown in Figure 1.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Amino acid sequence alignment of the conserved PI-II-like domains between different species.

PiII: Potato Proteinase Inhibitor II; TM: tomato (Solanum lycopersicum (formerly Lycopersicon esculentum); NA: Nicotiana alata; NT: tobacco (N. tabacum); CA: pepper (Capsicum annuum); ST: potato (S. tuberosum) cultivar Bintje; Ke: from potato (S. tuberosum) cultivar Kennebec. DC: the diploid line 11379-03, a mainly S. tuberosum- and S. phureja and S. stenotomum-derived material. Sh: potato (S. tuberosum) cultivar Shepody; Zh: S. tuberosum cultivar Zhongshu No. 3. The protein names and GIs are described in File S1. The reaction centre CTLEC and CPRNC of standard 8C PI-II (PiII-ST) in potato were written in dark blue. The conserved cysteine residues were highlighted either in yellow for the primary-sequence-level Domain 1 or in light greenish blue for the primary sequence-level Domain 2. The bold or bold-underlined amino acids are the ones showing the polymorphisms discussed in the text. Note that the 1st C and 2nd C in the first domain and the 4th C and 6th C in the second domain are missing in some genes and that the 7C-domain regions are more conserved than the upstream and the inter-domain regions among Pi7C alleles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.g001

Identification and feature analysis of Pi6C

When Pi7Cd (gi|13613799) was used in a BLAST search against the “est_others” database in GenBank, 10 similar ESTs (such as gi|12587033, gi|21916076) could be decoded into a peptide of 156 amino acids. The peptide carried two putative PI-II domains with six cysteine residues (6C) per domain (Figure 1). The 1st and 2nd cysteine residues of the first domain and the 4th and 6th cysteine residues of the second domain were absent (Figure 1).

Novel feature of Pi7C at the primary sequence level

Comparison of the conserved primary sequences between Pi7C and other PI-II domains allowed the discovery that each of the two Pi7C domains had only seven cysteine residues (7C), instead of the standard eight cysteine residues (8C). Since each PI-II functional protein is formed by two non-identical domains, the Pi7C protein is expected to miss one cysteine residue per domain and two cysteine residues (i.e., one pair) for the protein, compared with the conserved Pi8C protein. The two non-identical Pi7C domains are on the same peptide. This Pi7C encoded peptide did not have the first cysteine residue of the first domain, nor the sixth cysteine residue of the second domain. As underlined in Figure 1, the first cysteine residue (letter C) of Pi7Ca-DC and Pi7Cb-Sh was replaced by aspartate (letter D). The sixth C in the second domain was replaced by serine (letter S). The absence of two cysteine residues with their corresponding disulphide bonds is expected to cause protein structural change.

Domain numbers in Pi6C, Pi7C, and related PI-II peptides

Many PI-II peptides have multiple domains. For example, N. sylvestris PI-II (gi|76446054) has six PI-II domains, tomato PI-II ARPI (gi|405581) has three, but Pi6C and Pi7C have only two domains. The standard PI-II peptide (protein gi|AAA53278) of potato also has two PI-II domains. None of the potato ESTs picked up in the BLASTn search of March 2007 showed a different domain number. Of course, this result does not rule out the possibility of domain number variants within species because we did not analyze all paralogs of PI-II genes in all species. Further research is required to verify whether reduction in domain number is an evolutionary tendency from the ancestral species to the current tetraploid agricultural potato cultivars.

Conservation among Pi7C members

The availability of different Pi7C members permits analysis of which regions are more conserved than others along the Pi7C peptide. The amino acid length (152 amino acids) and the 7C were well conserved between the members, with polymorphism mainly upstream of the first domain and the inter-domain region. The leader-like first 13 amino acids (data not shown), the core domain regions, and the end area after the second domain, were 100% conserved among the Pi7C members analyzed. The results suggest the following: 1) The first and second domains may interact closely to work together for the gene's function; 2) The leader sequence and the region after the second domain are important functionally and were therefore conserved; 3) The length of the outside of the proteinase inhibitor domain region is also important, suggesting that the sequence outside the domain region also contributes to maintaining the structure of the Pi7C protein. The amino acid sequences, except the 8 C's, are not highly conserved between different 8C PI-II genes (Figure 1).

Estimated structural level change in Pi6C and Pi7C

Pi6C and Pi7C are likely different in structure from the standard PI-II due to the deletion of disulphide bond(s). The location of cysteine residue changes in Pi6C and Pi7C are illustrated on the standard PI-II domain at the protein structural level (pfam02428.12) (Figure 2). Both Pi6C and Pi7C lack the 1st cysteine residue (C1) on the first domain and the 6th cysteine residue (IIC6) on the second domain. These two cysteine residues in PI-II peptides pair to form a disulphide bond. In Pi6C and Pi7C, this bond would not exist. In Pi6C, the 2nd cysteine residue (C2) of the first domain and the 4th cysteine residue (IIC4) on the second domain were also absent. These two cysteine residues are paired in PI-II. Their absence in Pi6C should cause the absence of this disulphide bond. In Pi6C, the absence of both the C1-IIC6 and the C2-IIC4 bonds may cause the long chain from the N-terminal up to the C3 location to change its folding. The structure of the left head (pink coloured part in Figure 2), normally in the standard PI-II, would largely be destroyed/changed in Pi6C.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Indication of the cysteine-residue-missing locations of Pi7C protein on the standard structure of potato type II proteinase inhibitor (PI-II, pfam02428.12).

The graph is turned in a way that the missing cysteine residues can be labelled. The double-headed structure formed jointly by two domains. C1, C2, C3: The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cysteine residues in the first domain (at the primary-sequence level). IIC4, IIC6, IIC7: the 4th, 6th, and 7th cysteine residues in the second domain (at the primary-sequence level). Centre 1: The 1st reaction site (5 a.a., from C1 to C2, inclusive; marked in light yellow). Centre 2: The second reaction site (5 a.a. from IIC1 to IIC2, inclusive; marked in light yellow). S: The T (threonine) on the 2nd reaction centre was replaced by S (serine) in the 7C domain members (Pi7Ca, Pi7Cb, Pi7Cc, Pi7Cd, and Pi7Ce). The brown color indicates the disulphide bonds formed between paired cysteine residues. Note that without C1-IIC2 bond and C2-IIC4 bond, the 1st reaction site no longer exists and the structure of the protein will be considerably changed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.g002

The reaction centres were also substantially changed in Pi6C and Pi7C. The first PI-II reaction centre would largely lose activity due to the absence of the one (C1) or both pairs of cysteine residues (C1, C2) of the centre (Figure 2). This PI-II reaction centre in the tomato PI-II ARPI gene is CTKEC, but it became DAKEC in Pi7C, and WTKES in Pi6C. The second reaction centre in Pi6C is still intact, while in Pi7C it also mutated from the supposed CTKEC to CSKEC (the yellow region on the right blue head in Figure 2). In Pi6C, if the long chain from the N-terminal to the C3 area folded to the second reaction head, it would affect both function and specificity of the second reaction centre (Figure 2). Therefore, Pi6C has one centre knocked out and another centre could be affected, while Pi7C has one centre likely knocked out and one partially changed at the sequence level.

Phylogenetic analysis of Pi6C and Pi7C and related PI-II peptides

In the phylogenetic trees of the amino acid sequences, there were clearly two large clusters, in either the Maximum Likelihood tree or the Neighbour Joining tree (Figures 3, 4). One cluster was the standard PI-II members of 8C-PI-II proteins from tobacco (N. cavicola), pepper (C. annuum), tomato (formerly Lycopersicum esculentum now Solanum lycopersicum in GenBank), and potato (S. tuberosum). The other cluster, well separated as a new family, was all the natural variants with 7C or 6C domains, exclusively in potato (diploid and tetraploid) (Figures 3 and 4). When the tobacco (N. cavicola) was used as an outgroup, the 7C/6C cluster is close to ARPI-8C (Figure S1). The Pi6C and Pi7C forms two parallel groups, both related to the tomato ARPI on the phylogenetic tree, suggesting that Pi6C gene is likely not allelic to Pi7C gene in this cultivar Kennebec. Since none of the potato cDNA sequences with relatively high similarities to tomato ARPI can be decoded to a 8C-domain or to three PI-II domains either in our laboratory or GenBank, ARPI may not have a counterpart in the potato genotypes analyzed, or the counterpart is no longer expressed, or has been replaced by Pi6C or Pi7C.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Protein Maximum Likelihood unrooted phylogenetic tree of PI-II genes and Pi7C and Pi6C natural variants.

Pi7Ca-DC: Pi7C gene (EF469204) from the potato diploid clone 11379-03 that is essentially a Solanum tuberosum but with a background contribution from S. phureja and S. stenotomum. Other cultivars, Shepody, Kennebec, Zhongshu No. 3, are all tetraploid. Note that the Pi7C/Pi6C family cluster is separated from the standard 8C PI-II superfamily.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Protein NJ-1000 bootstraps phylogenetic tree (unrooted) of PI-II genes and Pi7C and Pi6C natural variants.

Genotypes used are as the same in Figure 3. Note that the Pi7C/Pi6C family cluster is separated from the standard 8C Pi-II superfamily.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.g004

Ka/Ks value analysis

When ARPI, Pi6C, and Pi7Ca nucleotide sequences were analyzed for Ka/Ks ratios, a positive selection (Ka/Ks = 2.3937) was found for the evolution from the ancestor of ARPI and Pi6C to Pi6C. There was a mild negative selection (Ka/Ks = 0.6062) from the ancestor of ARPI and Pi6C to ARPI. The evolution from the ancestor of the three genes to Pi7Ca was also under positive selection (Ka/Ks = 1.5215). When the nucleotide sequences of the coding regions of all the proteins in this study are used, a positive selection from the ancestor to Pi6C was 1.6216 with a moderate negative selection (Ka/Ks = 0.6399) for the tomato ARPI (See Node 6 in Table S1 and Figure S2). Strong positive selections have been detected for Pi7Ce (Ka/Ks = 5.9259) and Pi7Cc (Ka/Ks = 2.5474) (See Node 8 Branch 2 and Node 9 Branch 1, respectively, in Table S1 and Figure S2).

Discussion

Natural PI-II variants with a loss of cysteine residues at the first reaction centre

It was formerly believed that there were no natural variants for the cysteine residues at either of the two reaction centres on PI-II, likely because of the essential role of the disulphide bonds for reaction centre structure [15]. In this study, the recently available expressed gene sequences allow us to identify five variants with 7 cysteine residues and one variant with 6 cysteine residues in the domain. Each of these natural variants had a full open reading frame, conserved N-end and C-end regions, and was expressed in the potato plants. These natural variants with only 7C or 6C in each domain form a new PI-II family within the PI-II superfamily.

Selective loss of cysteine residues and disulphide bonds and functionality of intermediate versions of the genes

In all six 7C/6C natural variants, the missing cysteine residues and disulphide bonds were all at the first reaction centre (Figure 2). Also, the lost cysteine residues were always in pairs, despite being distantly separately at the primary nucleotide sequence level in their genes (Figure 1). There were no remaining free cysteine residues in Pi7C and Pi6C protein members. This fact suggests that the loss of disulphide bonds is likely selective, not random, because both missing bonds are at the first reaction centre, although it is unknown why the second reaction centre was more conserved than the first centre during evolution. The results favour the possibility that the second reaction centre plays a more housekeeping role than the first reaction centre does for the PI-II protein. It is unclear whether the loss of the first cysteine residues for the missing bonds was random or selective at this stage, but the loss of the second cysteine residues was clearly not random as they were the mates of the first ones. It also indicates that intermediate versions of the genes or proteins were affected by selection pressure; not a neutral process.

Evolutionary order of 6C domain and 7C domain compared to 8C domain

Tuber-bearing Solanum species are derived from non-tuberous species [25]. In the present study, Pi7C and Pi6C domains are identified exclusively in potato. The PI-II domains in other analyzed solanaceous plants are all of a typical Pi8C-type. Therefore, it is plausible to conclude that the Pi7C and Pi6C domains are derived from these typical 8C domains. The Pi7C members within cultivated diploid and tetraploid potatoes also suggest that the novel 7C domain is still differentiating to produce different alleles; likely partially influenced by agricultural selection in cultivated potatoes. The Pi7C and Pi6C domains are specific to the S. tuberosum potato, according to the information we have to date. Further study is required to investigate whether these domains in PI-II proteins exist in other Solanum species. If the Pi7C or Pi6C domain/genes can be found only in tuberous potato species, it would be interesting to determine whether there was a causal relationship, or simply a co-occurrence, between the loss of a pair of cysteines and the development of stem tubers.

Pi6C and Pi7C: Functional genes or pseudogenes

The Pi7C gene is probably functional; all four Pi7C alleles have a full length open reading frame, active expression, and greater conservation within the domain regions than within the inter-domain regions. Similarly, the Pi6C gene is probably also functional with its full open reading frame and active expression. Although the transgenic approach sometimes cannot clarify the function of the gene tested, this approach has been used to confirm proteinase inhibitor functions, including potato plant resistance to insects [26] or detection of their role in seed development [27]. The proteins of Pi7C and Pi6C are cell wall-embedded and complicated our in vitro expression essay. Therefore, transgenic knockout or down-regulation using RNA interference technology or antisense technology might confirm the function of Pi6C and Pi7C in potato plants.

Survival and differentiation of novel members in a gene family

The distribution of novel members of a gene family in populations is strongly influenced by selection pressure. In Brassica species, the male fertility-restorer genes for two male sterility systems (nap and pol) are alleles or haplotypes of the same locus. Which restorer gene is more frequently present in a given species or population is a reflection of their need to restore cytoplasmic male sterility in the species or population [28]. In the present study, the novel potato Pi6C was found in one of five potato genotypes while Pi7C occurred in all five. The parental intermediate versions for Pi6C and Pi7C were not found in these genotypes, likely due to selective loss because they had weaker beneficial response to selection than the Pi6C and Pi7C.

Pi6C and Pi7C formation

The loss of paired cysteine residues located quite distantly at the primary sequence level suggests that the mutations did not occur in a single step. These cysteine residues are in pairs at the protein level (Figure 2), but gene mutation must be at the DNA level where the corresponding regions of the two cysteine residues are quite far apart (Figure 1). The DNA sequences of these two regions are quite different, suggesting that they were not changed simply by segment duplication or deletion. After one cysteine residue was lost, the unpaired cysteine residue would have caused paring issues for cysteine residues in other regions. For this reason it is very likely that the protein could not function well with an unpaired cysteine residue in PI-II. Relative stability of the protein would have been regained only when the counterpart cysteine residue of the pair was also lost. This process is likely to be a step-by-step adjustment in response to selection pressure during evolution. It is known that pseudo genes usually do not react to selection and will likely rapidly accumulate mutations, except occasionally some segments may be picked up into functional genes through recombination [29]. Most of the successive versions of the gene during the generation of Pi6C or Pi7C must have had somewhat beneficial functions for the plants during this mutation process in order for selection to occur and to avoid disruption of the open reading frames. In other words, they were rarely pseudo genes. The ratio of non-synonymous substitutions (Ka) to the rate of synonymous substitutions (Ks) can be used as an indicator of selective pressure acting on a protein-coding gene [30], [31]. A Ka/Ks ratio greater than 1.0 is usually indicative of positive selection pressure. The evolution from the ancestor to Pi6C and Pi7C clearly occurred under positive selection with Ka/Ks ratios (1.5215–2.3937) much greater than 1.0 (See Results). As the emergence of Pi7C and Pi6C genes was clearly under positive selection, their intermediate gene versions are very likely to have been functional. The functional-to-functional evolution inferred from the analysis of these novel genes in the PI-II gene family may provide insights into the evolutionary process of many other genes.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

Potato diploid clone 11379-03 (DC) (essentially a S. tuberosum L.) [32] was used in this study. DC was derived from a number of crosses between different subspecies of the S. tuberosum group (S. stenotomum, S. phureja, and S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum), and was developed at the Potato Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Fredericton. Plant samples used for RNA isolation were collected from field-grown DC plants.

Potato cDNA library construction and DNA sequencing

Plants of the DC used in cDNA library construction, were grown at the Benton Breeding Station of the Potato Research Centre. RNA was extracted according to Li et al. [33]. A cDNA library, LIPTC, was constructed with the lambda Uni-ZAP XR vector–Bluescript SK phagemid system and protocol with insertion sites EcoRI and XhoI (Stratagene, Vancouver, Canada) using mRNA of the main mass (storage parenchyma-perimedulla excluding the central pith) of immature tubers 85 days after planting. Random cDNA phagemid clones were sequenced from the 5′end, and some were confirmed with 3′end using the Applied Biosystems (ABI) BigDye Ready Reaction (Cat. # 4303152, California, USA) and an ABI DNA sequencer system. Assignment of putative function of the ESTs/genes was based on their homology with known genes in a BLAST search using the most recent releases of GenBank. For eliminating the errors associated with single-run EST sequencing, only the polymorphisms confirmed by at least one other EST were used for detailed analysis.

Identification of the putative PI-II cDNA and bioinformatic analysis

A cDNA clone with serial number C463 (the allele later called Pi7Ca in this article) in our laboratory in AAFC was identified as a putative PI-II and then re-sequenced in both directions with an ABI DNA sequencer. Nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acid sequences using http://insilico.ehu.es/translate [34]. The protein sequence was used in “position-specific iterated and pattern-hit initiated BLAST” (PSI- and PHI-BLAST) [35], [36] to identify similar proteins and conserved known domains, which were then aligned to show the existence or absence of cysteine residues. The File S1 presents the tabulated list of proteins (or the source mRNA IDs for the translated amino acid sequences) that were used in this alignment. The domain's known structure was viewed with Cn3D 4.1 (an NCBI's helper application, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/CN3D/cn3d.shtml). The amino acid alignment between PI-II members was exported to a FASTA file and further treated with BiEdit Sequence Alignment Editor (version 7.0.5.3) [37] (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html).

Phylogeny analysis

Protein sequences were used in phylogenetic analysis. The protein sequences were downloaded from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) if they had an available ID in GenBank. For expressed sequences without available GenBank ID, the cDNA sequences were translated into protein sequences using the insilico.ehu.es website (http://insilico.ehu.es/translate) [34]. In addition to the known PI-II proteins with 8-cysteines in each domain in potato (S. tuberosum) and its close relatives tomato (S. lycopersicum) and pepper (C. annuum), all the abnormal PI-II sequences were used in phylogenetic analysis as long as their amino acid sequences showed at least one cysteine residue missing. The tobacco (N. cavicola) was used as an outgroup in one of the trees because it has sufficient similarity with both Pi7C and PI-II genes to allow the phylogenetic tree to stay within a reasonable size. Their amino acid sequence phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using BioEdit [37] using amino acid sequences (File S2). Two approaches were used in reconstructing the phylogenetic tree: One was Clustal [38]-ProML option—conducting the ClustalW Multiple Alignment (File S3) and then reconstructing the Protein Maximum Likelihood tree (File S4). The other approach was to use the “ClustalW Multiple Alignment” and 1000 “bootstraps NJ tree” option to do alignment and then generate the phylogenetic tree (File S5) with Protdist Neighbor Phylogenetic Tree Option (PROTDIST version 3.5c) (an option in BioEdit). The outtree files were saved as .txt files and then opened with TreeView (win32) 1.6.6. (http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html) and then saved as graphics.

Ka/Ks value analysis

The ratios of the rates of non-synonymous substitutions (Ka) to the rates of synonymous substitutions (Ks), as described by Liberles [30], [31] were calculated using the Ka/Ks Calculator Tool http://services.cbu.uib.no/tools/kaks. The input nucleotide sequences were the mRNA region encoding the proteins used in phylogenetic tree analysis (File S6). The Ka/Ks Calculator Tool calculated the multiple sequence alignment and the phylogenetic tree from these input sequences, translated the DNA-sequences to protein, calculated the alignment, transformed it back to DNA, and aligned it on codon boundaries for Ka/Ks calculation. This alignment was used to calculate a phylogenetic tree using a least squares distance method with Jukes and Cantors distances on the DNA. For additional detail, the reader is referred to http://services.cbu.uib.no/tools/kaks/docs/kaksfields#phyl0.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Protein NJ-1000 bootstraps phylogenetic tree, rooted using the tobacco PiII8C as the outgroup, of PI-II genes and Pi7C and Pi6C natural variants. Genotypes used are the same in Figure 3. Note that the tomato ARPI is close to the Pi7C/Pi6C family.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

A phylogenetic tree of mRNA sequences that encode PI-II and Pi7C/6C proteins, reconstructed by the Ka/Ks Calculator Tool ( http://services.cbu.uib.no/tools/kaks ).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s002

(TIF)

Table S1.

Ka/Ks values for each node of the tree in Figure S2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s003

(DOC)

File S1.

The IDs and plant species of proteins or the source mRNA sequences used in Figure 1 .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s004

(TXT)

File S2.

The input amino acid sequences for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s005

(TXT)

File S3.

The ClustalW Multiple Alignment file of amino acid sequences used in phylogenetic tree reconstruction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s006

(DOC)

File S4.

The tree file for Figure 3 “Protein Maximum Likelihood unrooted phylogenetic tree of PI-II genes and Pi7C and Pi6C natural variants.”

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s007

(DOC)

File S5.

The tree file for Figure 4 “ Protein NJ-1000 bootstraps phylogenetic tree (unrooted) of PI-II genes and Pi7C and Pi6C natural variants.”

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s008

(DOC)

File S6.

The input file of the mRNA coding sequences for Ka/Ks analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018615.s009

(TXT)

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Muhammad Haroon for his technical assistance in RNA preparation, cDNA library construction, and DNA sequencing, Dr. Marc Fortin for his involvement in the early stages of this study, and Professor David Liberles for assistance in Ka/Ks ratio analysis and suggestions in phylogenetic tree reconstruction.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XQL. Performed the experiments: TLZ XQL. Analyzed the data: XQL. Wrote the paper: XQL. Contributed to the manuscript: DD.

References

  1. 1. Fahnoe DC, Johnson GD, Herman SB, Ahn K (2000) Disulfide bonds in big ET-1 are essential for the specific cleavage at the Trp21-Val22 bond by soluble endothelin converting enzyme-1 from baculovirus/insect cells. Arch Biochem Biophys 373: 385–393.
  2. 2. Van Vlijmen HWT, Gupta A, Narasimhan LS, Singh J (2004) A Novel Database of Disulfide Patterns and its Application to the Discovery of Distantly Related Homologs. J Mol Biol 335: 1083–1092.
  3. 3. Betz SF (1993) Disulfide bonds and the stability of globular proteins. Protein Sci 2: 1551–1558.
  4. 4. Perlman JH, Wang W, Nussenzveig DR, Gershengorn MC (1995) A disulfide bond between conserved extracellular cysteines in the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor is critical for binding. J Biol Chem 270: 24682–24685.
  5. 5. Knudsen SM, Tams JW, Wulff BS, Fahrenkrug J (1997) A disulfide bond between conserved cysteines in the extracellular loops of the human VIP receptor is required for binding and activation. FEBS Lett 412: 141–143.
  6. 6. Thornton JM (1981) Disulphide bridges in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 151: 261–287.
  7. 7. Thangudu RR, Manoharan M, Srinivasan N, Cadet F, Sowdhamini R, et al. (2008) Analysis on conservation of disulphide bonds and their structural features in homologous protein domain families. BMC Struct Biol 8:
  8. 8. Fitton HL, Walker ID, Jones L, Brown K, Carrell RW, et al. (1997) Five antithrombin variants, four associated with thrombosis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 8: 145–148.
  9. 9. Belville C, Maréchal JD, Pennetier S, Carmillo P, Masgrau L, et al. (2009) Natural mutations of the anti-Müllerian hormone type II receptor found in persistent Müllerian duct syndrome affect ligand binding, signal transduction and cellular transport. Human Mol Genet 18: 3002–3013.
  10. 10. Behe MJ, Snoke DW (2004) Simulating evolution by gene duplication of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues. Protein Sci 13: 2651–2664.
  11. 11. Lynch M (2005) Simple evolutionary pathways to complex proteins. Protein Sci 14: 2217–2225.
  12. 12. Pena-Cortes H, Liu X, Sanchez-Serrano J, Schmid R, Willmitzer L (1992) Factors affecting gene expression of patatin and proteinaes-inhibitor-II gene families in detached potato leaves: implications for their co-expression in developing tubers. Planta 186: 495–502.
  13. 13. Greenblatt HM, Ryan CA, James MN (1989) Structure of the complex of Streptomyces griseus proteinase B and polypeptide chymotrypsin inhibitor-1 from Russet Burbank potato tubers at 2.1 A resolution. J Mol Biol 205: 201–228.
  14. 14. Barta E, Pintar A, Pongor S (2002) Repeats with variations: accelerated evolution of the Pin2 family of proteinase inhibitors. Trends Genet 18: 600–603.
  15. 15. Beekwilder J, Schipper B, Bakker P, Bosch D, Jongsma M (2000) Characterization of potato proteinase inhibitor II reactive site mutants. Eur J Biochem 267: 1975–1984.
  16. 16. Ryan CA (1990) Proteinase inhibitors in plants: genes for improving defenses against insects and pathogens. Ann Rev Phytopathol 28: 425–449.
  17. 17. Barrette-Ng IH, Ng KK, Cherney MM, Pearce G, Ryan CA, et al. (2003) Structural basis of inhibition revealed by a 1∶2 complex of the two-headed tomato inhibitor-II and subtilisin Carlsberg. J Biol Chem 278: 24062–24071.
  18. 18. Krystek S, Stouch T, Novotny J (1993) Affinity and specificity of serine endopeptidase-protein inhibitor interactions. Empirical free energy calculations based on X-ray crystallographic structures. J Mol Biol 234: 661–679.
  19. 19. Schirra HJ, Guarino RF, Anderson MA, Craik DJ (2010) Selective removal of individual disulfide bonds within a potato type II serine proteinase inhibitor from Nicotiana alata reveals differential stabilization of the reactive-site loop. J Mol Biol 395: 609–626.
  20. 20. Jongsma MA, Bakker PL, Stiekema WJ, Bosch D (1995) Phage display of a double-headed proteinase inhibitor: Analysis of the binding domains of potato proteinase inhibitor II. Mol Breed 1: 181–191.
  21. 21. Zhang T, Fortin M, Donnelly D, Li XQ (2008) Constitutive expression of a new proteinase inhibitor II family gene in potato. J Huazhong Agri Univ 27: 10–16.
  22. 22. Young RJ, Scheuring CF, Harris-Haller L, Taylor BH (1994) An auxin-inducible proteinase inhibitor gene from tomato. Plant Physiol 104: 811–812.
  23. 23. Taylor BH, Young RJ, Scheuring CF (1993) Induction of a proteinase inhibitor II-class gene by auxin in tomato roots. Plant Mol Biol 23: 1005–1014.
  24. 24. Flinn B, Rothwell C, Griffiths R, Lague M, DeKoeyer D, et al. (2005) Potato expressed sequence tag generation and analysis using standard and unique cDNA libraries. Plant Mol Biol 59: 407–433.
  25. 25. Hawkes JG (1988) The evolution of cultivated potatoes and their tuber-bearing wild relatives. Die Kulturpflanze (Genet Resour Crop Evol) 36: 189–208.
  26. 26. Abdeen A, Virgos A, Olivella E, Villanueva J, Aviles X, et al. (2005) Multiple insect resistance in transgenic tomato plants over-expressing two families of plant proteinase inhibitors. Plant Mol Biol 57: 189–202.
  27. 27. Sin SF, Yeung EC, Chye ML (2006) Downregulation of Solanum americanum genes encoding proteinase inhibitor II causes defective seed development. Plant J 45: 58–70.
  28. 28. Li XQ, Jean M, Landry BS, Brown GG (1998) Restorer genes for different forms of Brassica cytoplasmic male sterility map to a single nuclear locus that modifies transcripts of several mitochondrial genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 10032–10037.
  29. 29. Miyata T, Yasunaga T (1981) Rapidly evolving mouse alpha-globin-related pseudo gene and its evolutionary history. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78: 450–453.
  30. 30. Anisimova M, Liberles DA (2007) The quest for natural selection in the age of comparative genomics. Heredity 99: 567–579.
  31. 31. Liberles DA (2001) Evaluation of methods for determination of a reconstructed history of gene sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 18: 2040–2047.
  32. 32. Li XQ, De Jong H, De Jong DM, De Jong WS (2005) Inheritance and genetic mapping of tuber eye depth in cultivated diploid potatoes. Theor Appl Genet 110: 1068–1073.
  33. 33. Li XQ, Zhang M, Brown GG (1996) Cell-specific expression of mitochondrial transcripts in maize seedlings. Plant Cell 8: 1961–1975.
  34. 34. Bikandi J, San Millan R, Rementeria A, Garaizar J (2004) In silico analysis of complete bacterial genomes: PCR, AFLP-PCR and endonuclease restriction. Bioinformatics 20: 798–799.
  35. 35. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 25: 3389–3402.
  36. 36. Altschul SF, Wootton JC, Gertz EM, Agarwala R, Morgulis A, et al. (2005) Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices. FEBS J 272: 5101–5109.
  37. 37. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41: 95–98.
  38. 38. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res 25: 4876–4882.