The cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa, is able to proliferate in a wide range of freshwater ecosystems and to produce many secondary metabolites that are a threat to human and animal health. The dynamic of this production and more globally the metabolism of this species is still poorly known. A DNA microarray based on the genome of M. aeruginosa PCC 7806 was constructed and used to study the dynamics of gene expression in this cyanobacterium during the light/dark cycle, because light is a critical factor for this species, like for other photosynthetic microorganisms. This first application of transcriptomics to a Microcystis species has revealed that more than 25% of the genes displayed significant changes in their transcript abundance during the light/dark cycle and in particular during the dark/light transition. The metabolism of M. aeruginosa is compartmentalized between the light period, during which carbon uptake, photosynthesis and the reductive pentose phosphate pathway lead to the synthesis of glycogen, and the dark period, during which glycogen degradation, the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, the TCA branched pathway and ammonium uptake promote amino acid biosynthesis. We also show that the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, such as microcystins, aeruginosin and cyanopeptolin, occur essentially during the light period, suggesting that these metabolites may interact with the diurnal part of the central metabolism.
Citation: Straub C, Quillardet P, Vergalli J, de Marsac NT, Humbert J-F (2011) A Day in the Life of Microcystis aeruginosa Strain PCC 7806 as Revealed by a Transcriptomic Analysis. PLoS ONE 6(1): e16208. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016208
Editor: Christian Schönbach, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan
Received: September 18, 2010; Accepted: December 8, 2010; Published: January 19, 2011
Copyright: © 2011 Straub et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work has been funded by the ANR (French governemental agency for the research). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Microcystis aeruginosa is one of the most common bloom-forming cyanobacteria in freshwater ecosystems, and is widely distributed on the five continents. Members of this genus are known to be able to synthesize numerous secondary metabolites, including microcystins, which are hepatotoxins frequently involved in animal and human poisoning , . The genomes of two M. aeruginosa strains (PCC 7806 and NIES-843) have recently been sequenced , , revealing their high plasticity, due in part to the presence of numerous, long, repeated sequences and transposase genes.
The annual life cycle of M. aeruginosa is characterized by two distinct phases. The first is a benthic phase, during which it lives on sediment during the Winter and the early Spring, and the second a planktonic phase, during which it lives in the water column during Summer and Autumn . During this second phase, M. aeruginosa cells are organized in colonies, which carry out daily vertical migrations in the water column . These vertical migrations are due to hydrodynamic processes, and also to the ability of these microorganisms to regulate their buoyancy , . One of the most spectacular effects of this process is the accumulation of M. aeruginosa colonies in the top few centimeters of the water column in the early morning, and their subsequent progressive disappearance from the surface over the course of the day. The light exposure of M. aeruginosa cells can be very limited due to these vertical migrations and to low light levels in the water column when high cyanobacterial biomass reduces water transparency.
This limited exposure to light can have very important consequences for the metabolism of this photosynthetic microorganism, and may have resulted in adaptative mechanisms to ensure the optimal use of the light available. For example, two recent publications have suggested that M. aeruginosa is better able to tolerate lack of light than green algae , . However, little firm information is available about the metabolism of this species during the light/dark cycle. Microarray technology, which provides an overall view of gene expression over time, is one of the best ways to obtain such data. Several recent publications on three cyanobacterial species, Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 , , Cyanothece sp. strain 51142  and Prochlorococcus marinus strain MED4  have demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach.
In the present work we set out to construct a microarray based on the genome of M. aeruginosa strain PCC 7806 in order to study the dynamics of gene expression in this cyanobacterium during the light/dark cycle.
Strain and culture conditions
Microcystis aeruginosa strain PCC 7806 (hereafter designated M. aeruginosa), provided by the Pasteur Culture Collection of Cyanobacteria (Institut Pasteur of Paris), was grown in BG11 medium  containing 2 mM of NaNO3 and 10 mM of NaHCO3. Cultures were placed in an incubator (INFORS AG, Switzerland) continuously sparged with 1% (v/v) CO2 in air, at 22°C, shaken (90 rpm), and exposed to 12 h-12 h light-dark cycles. The photosynthetic photon flux density during the light period (50 µmol photons.m−2.s−1; cool white OSRAM L 18/640) was measured using a LICOR LI-185B quantum/radiometer/photometer equipped with a LICOR LI-193SB spherical sensor.
Two independent experiments, each with three biological replicates, were conducted. in 1L Erlenmeyer flasks. To train the circadian clock before sampling, the cultures were incubated for 10 days under the same experimental conditions. Cell growth was followed by monitoring the OD750 using a Uvikon 933 VIS-US spectrophotometer (Kontron Instruments).
Samples were taken in the middle of the exponential-growth phase (OD750 0.6 to 0.8) of the cultures over a period of 24 h (all times are expressed in terms of a 24-h clock): at T0 (00:00, the middle of dark period), T1 (05:30, i.e. 30 min before the transition from dark to light), T2 (06:30, i.e. 30 min after the transition from dark to light), T3 (07:30, i.e. 90 min after the transition from dark to light), T4 (12:00, the middle of the light period), T5 (18:30, i.e. 30 min after the transition from light to dark) and finally T6 (24:00, the middle of the dark period) (Supporting Information S1). T6 of this cycle corresponds to T0 of the next 24-h cycle. For each time point, 50 ml of the cultures of each replicate were collected, and centrifuged (15000 g, 2 min, 4°C). The cell pellets were then frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until used for RNA extraction. In the first experiment, samples were collected only at times T0, T2, T4, T5 and T6, whereas in the second experiment all the time points were sampled.
Total RNA was isolated and purified using the kit RiboPure™-Bacteria (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cell pellets were resuspended in 750 µl RNAwiz, and 500 µl Zirconia Beads were added. The bacterial cells were lysed for 200 s (10×20 s with 1 min intervals on ice) in a FastPrep FP120 (Qbiogene) at speed 5 m.s−1. DNase I treatment was not performed. RNA concentrations were quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies), and the quality of the RNA extracts was checked using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, RNA 6000 Nano reagents and RNA Nano Chips (Agilent Technologies) according to the Manufacturer's instructions.
cDNA synthesis and Cy-dye labeling
Five µg of the purified total RNA was used for the random priming of cDNA synthesis and fluorescence labeling (Cy3 or Cy5 dye, Amersham, GE Healthcare) using the SuperScript™ Indirect cDNA Labeling System (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Indirect labeling relies on the incorporation of aminoallyl-modified nucleotides into cDNA derived from the target RNA. The aminoallyl side chains were then used to label the cDNA with either Cy3 or Cy5. The efficiency of the labeling procedure was analyzed by a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop technologies). The labeled cDNA was used immediately for hybridization to a microarray.
Construction of Microcystis aeruginosa microarrays
The transcriptomic study was performed using an Agilent 4X44K two-color microarray (Agilent technologies). Each slide contained 4 arrays each with 44,000 spots. Specific oligonucleotides (60-mers) were designed for 5085 protein-coding genes corresponding to 96% of the total predicted protein-coding genes in the annotated genome of the M. aeruginosa . Oligonucleotide probes for each gene were designed by the eArray protocol (Agilent technologies). Five, four, three, two and one oligonucleotide probes were defined for 68%, 9%, 11%, 9% and 3% of genes, respectively. Each oligonucleotide was randomly printed in duplicate across one array by means of the SurePrint technology (Agilent Technologies).
Hybridization and scanning of DNA microarrays
Hybridization was performed according to the protocol for the two-color microarray-based gene expression analysis recommended by Agilent Technologies. Briefly, Cy3-labeled cDNAs (150 pmol) from the control culture (T0) was mixed with Cy5-labeled cDNAs (150 pmol) from other time points (T1 to T6), and they were hybridized to one array. The color-swapped cDNA samples (i.e. the same samples with the reverse combination of dye labels) were hybridized to the other array on the same glass slide. The resulting mixture was hybridized to an array at 65°C for 17 h. Following hybridization, each slide was washed as recommended by Agilent. After the slide had been air dried, it was scanned using a GenePix 4200AL scanner (Axon Instruments, Union City, Calif.) at 5 µm resolution. The signal intensity of each spot and its local background were determined using GenePix Pro software (Version 6, Axon Instruments). The net signal intensity was calculated by subtracting the median signal intensity of all the pixels within the local background area from the median signal intensity of all the pixels within the spot area. All the spot areas recognized by the automatic alignment function of the GenePix Pro were confirmed visually. The flagged spots were not used for subsequent data analysis.
Microarray data analyses
Any bias in signal intensity between the two fluorescent dye channels in a microarray was normalized by locally weighted linear regression analysis or Lowess normalization  using MIDAS (freely available from http://www.tm4.org/midas.html). For all normalizations, the smoothing parameter was set to 0.33. Low-intensity spots (Cy3 or Cy5 intensity <2500) were filtered and then, pairs of flip-dye data were subjected to a flip-dye consistency check in which data outside of a two standard-deviations cut-off were removed. The relative expression level of a gene at a given time point was calculated as log2 (Cy5/Cy3), where Cy5 and Cy3 were normalized signal intensities from experimental and control cDNAs.
Several probes (usually, five) were designed for each protein-coding gene, and as two independent experiments were performed in triplicate (biological replicates) and swapping two colors (CY-3/CY-5, CY-5/CY-3, technical replicates), it follows that the transcript abundance obtained for each gene at each sampling time was based on 12 to 60 measurements.
Statistical analyses of the data were performed using the Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) algorithms  in MeV (http://www.tm4.org/mev.html), on the median of log2-transformed signal ratios (fold change) of the replicate spots. This analysis was done gene by gene (time point TX/T0 tested against time point T0/T0; One class analysis), but also by taking into account all the genes in the same analysis (Multi class analysis). SAM analysis uses repeated permutations of the data to find out whether the expression of any genes is significantly related to the response. The data for each gene are permuted, and a t-test is computed for both the original and the permuted data for each gene. One valuable feature of SAM is that it gives estimates of the False Discovery Rate (FDR), which is the proportion of genes likely to have been picked out by chance as being significant. Stringent parameters were applied for this criteria because we chose a delta value so that estimated FDR was equal to zero. Finally, a gene was considered as presenting a significant variation in its transcript abundance when it was found significant by SAM analysis (One class or Multi class) for at least one sampling time.
The time point T0 consisted in examining one sample against itself (T0/T0), so that the log2-transformed signal ratio for each gene is expected to be near the value 0. As a control, we have checked using SAM that at time T0, no gene displayed a mean variation of their expression level that was significantly different from 0.
During the normalization step, a strong dye bias (CY-3/CY-5 data very different from CY-5/CY-3 data) was found for the genes displaying very high expression values (Table S1). These values were eliminated from the analysis by applying a flip dye consistency check after the normalization step, a function provided by the MIDAS software. As a result, 70 genes were eliminated from the analysis. For 258 genes, data were only available at certain time sampling points, whereas a complete time series data was obtained for 4757 genes. Very good overall reproducibility of the results was found for these genes, as illustrated for example for hypD in Supporting Information S1.
To obtain an overview of the global pattern of gene expression during the 24-h light/dark cycle, we performed a principal component analysis (PCA) on the transcript abundance values of the 4757 genes (displaying a complete time series data) obtained for each replicate at each sampling time. The projection of these points onto the plane defined by the first two axes accounting for 45.8% of the total variance (Fig. 1), displayed a spatial ordination of the samples during the light/dark cycle. For each sampling time, all the replicates of the two independent experiments were grouped together and clearly separated from those for the other sampling times. Moreover, the spatial ordination of these points described a clockwise circle beginning at 00:00 and finishing at 24:00.
The projection of the samples onto the two most informative axes (Axis 1 and 2) is shown and the inertia value of each axis is provided. At each sampling time, all replicates are represented by the same symbols and grouped in the same ellipse. The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle.
Temporal dynamics of the transcriptome
From the statistical analyses, it appeared that the transcript levels of 1344 genes varied significantly at least at one sampling time during the light/dark cycle, which is equivalent to 25% of the M. aeruginosa protein-coding genes identified in the genome. The complete data set is provided in Table S2. We found also that among these 1344 genes, 40% displayed a zenith (peak-up) or a nadir (peak down) in their transcript abundance at 07:30 (i.e. 1h30 after the transition from dark to light) knowing that most of them were characterized by a maximum transcript abundance (Fig. 2A). For most of these genes, changes could already be observed at 06:30, 30 min after the lights had been switched on. At 12:00, the number of genes differentially expressed steadily decreased, and then remained stable untill 18:30 (i.e. 30 min after the transition from light to dark). In the middle of the night (24:00), around 100 genes still displayed significant variations in their expression relative to T0. Overall, the maximum or minimum values of the expression of all the genes usually occurred at 07:30, with a second peak at 18:30 (Fig. 2B). This indicates that light/dark (or dark/light) transition triggers major changes in the expression of the M. aeruginosa genome.
A. Number of genes displaying an increase (Up genes) or a decrease (Down genes) in their transcript abundance during the light/dark cycle. B. Number of genes displaying a zenith of their transcript abundance (Peak up) or the nadir of their transcript abundance (Peak down) during the light/dark cycle. The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle.
Transcriptome analysis and clusters of orthologous genes (COG) categories
The 1344 genes displaying significant variations during the light/dark cycle were further sorted using COG (cluster of orthologous genes) categories . It was possible to assign a COG category to 853 (63%) of these 1344 genes. On the basis of their pattern of expression during the light/dark cycle, the COG-assigned genes could be divided into 4 groups (Fig. 3).
A. Genes peaking both at 7:30 and 18:30. B. Genes only peaking at 7:30. C. Genes showing maximum expression throughout the light period. D. Gene only peaking at12:00. For each COG (cluster of orthologous genes) category, we estimated the percentage of genes (belonging to this category) displaying a zenith (Peak up) or a nadir of their transcript abundance (Peak down) during the light/dark cycle. The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle.
The first group (29% of the COG-assigned genes) contained genes that peaked at both 07:30 and 18:30 (Fig. 3A). These genes belonged to five COG categories (C: Energy production and conversion; E: Amino acid transport and metabolism; F: Nucleotide transport and metabolism; G: Carbohydrate transport and metabolism and K: Transcription), and among them, the highest transcript levels were obtained for genes involved in photosynthesis and energy metabolism.
The second group (36% of the COG-assigned genes) contained genes that peaked only at 07:30 (Fig. 3B). Genes in this group belonged to nine COG categories (H: Coenzyme metabolism; I: Lipid metabolism; J: Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; M: Cell envelope biogenesis, outer membrane; N: Cell motility and secretion; P: Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; T: Signal transduction mechanisms; U: Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport and V: Defense mechanisms;) and among them, the highest transcript levels were found for genes involved in lipid metabolism and translation processes.
The other two groups included genes representing only a small number of COG categories. The third group (10% of the COG-assigned genes) contained genes displaying high transcript levels throughout the light period (Fig. 3C). These genes belonged to three COG categories (L: DNA replication, recombination and repair; O: Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones and Q: Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism). The fourth group contained genes belonging to only one COG category (D: Cell division and chromosome partitioning), and displaying high transcript levels in the middle of the light period (Fig. 3D).
Finally, 25% of the COG-assigned genes belonged to categories R and S, which are poorly characterized.
Carbon transport and energy metabolism
Most of the genes with expression peaks at both 07:30 and 18:30 are involved in carbon transport and energy metabolism processes (COG categories C and G). A more detailed analysis shows that transcript abundance of the ccm (carbon dioxide concentrating mechanism) and rbc (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase) genes peaked soon after the transition from dark to light and then rapidly decreased after the transition from light to dark (Fig. 4A). Similar patterns of expression were found for most of the genes encoding the ndh (NADH dehydrogenase subunits) and for the atp genes (ATP synthase subunits) (Figs. 4C and 4D). On the other hand, the opposite pattern of expression was found for genes involved in the respiratory terminal oxidase system (cta genes), such as the genes encoding three cytochrome c oxidase subunits and the protoheme IX farnesyltransferase (Fig. 4B).
A. Carbon dioxide concentrating mechanism genes (ccm genes) and ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase genes (rbc genes). B. Respiratory terminal oxidases, cytochrome c oxidases and protoheme IX farnesyltransferase genes (cta and cyd genes). C. ATP synthase genes (atp genes). D. NADH dehydrogenase genes (ndh genes). The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle.
Only four pet genes (cytochrome b6f complex) displayed significant variations in their transcript abundance. For the petCA gene cluster, the maximum transcript level occurred at 07:30 (Supporting Information S1), while the petBD gene cluster peaked at 12:30 and 18:30 (Supporting Information S1). Like petBD, but unlike petAC, cydA and cydB (cytochrome bd-I quinol oxidase) displayed their lowest transcript levels in the morning, and their highest ones in the afternoon (Fig. 4B). Finally, the hoxEFUYH (bidirectional hydrogenase) and the hypCD genes (maturation of the enzyme) displayed similar patterns of expression, with transcript levels peaking at the beginning of the dark period (Table S2).
Eleven photosystem I genes (psa) and 20 photosystem II genes (psb) have been identified in M. aeruginosa. These include psbD, psbD2, psbQ, psbW, psb27 and psb29, which displayed significant changes in their transcript patterns with maximum values at 06:30 or 07:30 (Fig. 5). On the other hand, psaK2 transcript abundance was very low at 05:30 and 06:30, but peaked at 12:00. The psbU gene displayed a single transcript abundance peak, which occurred at the beginning of the dark period (18:30).
The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle.
Finally, when considering the TCA cycle, four genes (isocitrate dehydrogenase(icd), citrate synthase (gltA), succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit (sdhA) and succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur protein subunit (sdhB)) among the seven genes described in the M. aeruginosa genome for this pathway, displayed significant changes in their transcript abundance, with maximum transcript abundance values during the night and minimum values just at the beginning of the light period (Fig. 6).
Nitrogen and phosphate transport and metabolism
The transportation and metabolism of nitrate and phosphate are very important for freshwater cyanobacteria as these nutrients are generally growth limiting in continental aquatic ecosystems. While the transcript levels of narB (nitrate reductase) did not significantly change during the light-dark cycle, the expression of the nirA (nitrite reductase) and nrt (nitrate/nitrite transport) genes both peaked soon after the light was switched on (Fig. 7A). In contrast, the expression of the three ammonium permease genes occurred later (amt1 and amt2: max value at 12:00; amt3: max value at the beginning of the dark period) (Fig. 7B). The same pattern of expression as for amt3 was found for the genes involved in the transport and synthesis of glutamate (gltS and gltBD, respectively) or of glutamine (glnH and glnA, respectively), as well as for the gltA (citrate synthase) and icd (isocitrate dehydrogenase), two genes required for the synthesis of 2-oxoglutarate, and for the glnB gene that codes for the signal transduction PII protein, which is known to coordinate nitrogen and carbon metabolism (Fig. 7B and Table S2).
A. Nitrite reductase (nirA) and the nitrate/nitrite transport (nrt) genes. B. Ammonium permease (amt), transport and synthesis of glutamate (glt) and glutamine (gln) genes. The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle.
It is worth noticing that gltBD (NADH-dependent glutamate synthase subunits) and glsF (ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase) display opposite patterns of expression, with a high level of glsF transcripts observed from 06:30 to 12:00 followed by a decrease during the dark period, which is when the gltBD transcripts reached their maximum value. Like the nirA and nrt genes, the transcript levels of argJ (a bifunctional enzyme involved in the first step of the arginine biosynthetic pathway from glutamate) display a sharp increase followed by a decrease during the light-dark cycle, peaking at 07:30 (Fig. 7B and Table S2).
Three ABC-type phosphate transporter genes (pst) displayed only slight variations in their transcript abundance, which was characterized by a slight increase between 00:00 and 07:30, followed by a decrease. In contrast, the two phosphate regulator genes phoB (a two-component system response regulator of a phosphate sensing system) and phoU (a phosphate uptake regulator) displayed contrasting patterns of expression, with a marked decrease in phoB transcript levels at 12:00 and 18:30, whereas those of phoU increased during the night (18:30 and 24:00) (Table S2).
Cell division and chromosome partitioning
The transcript levels of most COG category D genes (D: Cell division and chromosome partitioning) were high in the middle of the light period. However, their pattern of expression was essentially due to variations in the transcript levels of genes either with unknown functions or only indirectly related to cell division. The transcript abundance of only one gene that may be involved in chromosome partitioning (MIC_1479) peaked in the middle of the light period (Table S2). The transcript abundance of ftsH, which encodes a protein essential for cell division and classified as COG category O, peaked at 5:30, just before the dark/light transition, whereas ftsK/spoIIIE, which encodes a putative cell division protein, and minD which encodes a septum site-determining protein peaked at 6:30, just after the dark/light transition. Similarly, genes encoding rod shape-determining proteins (mreB; mreC, belonging to the COG category M) displayed a transcript abundance peak at 07:30 (Table S2).
COG analysis of the genes belonging to category Q (Q: Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism) has shown that most of the genes involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites displayed high transcript levels throughout the light period. More detailed analysis showed that all the genes involved in the biosynthesis of microcystins (mcy genes), with the exception of mcyB and mcyD, were characterized by an increase in their transcript abundance shortly after the light was switched on (at 06:30 and 07:30, respectively), then remained stable or declined slightly until night began (18:30), and finally displayed a sharp decrease when the light was turned off (Fig. 8A). The mcyB and mcyD genes displayed the same overall transcription patterns, but the changes were not statistically significant due to wide variations in the values obtained for the different replicates. The transcription patterns of the genes involved in the biosynthesis of both aeruginosin and cyanopeptolin were generally similar to those of the microcystin genes, with only a slight difference for the mcnA and mcnB genes, which displayed a single transcript abundance peak just after the transition from dark to light (06:30), followed by a decrease (Fig. 8B and 8C). Similarly, the transcript levels of the genes required for the biosynthesis of the patellamide-like microcyclamide, also rose just after the transition from dark to light (06:30 and 07:30), and then fell during the light period (Fig. 8D). Finally, the two PKS I gene clusters (PKSI modular/PKSIII and PKSI iterative) did not show any significant variation in their transcript levels during the light/dark cycle (Table S2).
Regulation of the light/dark cycle (Circadian clock and sigma factors)
The day/night variations in the abundance of transcripts of numerous genes suggest that they are influenced by both light and an endogenous circadian rhythm. This prompted us to look at the dynamics of the genes involved in the circadian clock (kai genes). Whereas the transcript levels of the kaiA gene showed no significant modifications during the light/dark cycle, the transcription patterns of the kaiB and kaiC genes and of the two-component sensor histidine kinase sasA gene (KaiC-interacting protein), were very similar (Fig. 9A). In contrast, the rpaA gene, which together with sasA forms a two-component regulatory system involved in circadian clock regulation, did not display any significant changes in transcript abundance (Table S2). Finally, kaiB1, a paralog of the kaiB gene, displayed an inverse pattern of expression to kaiB and kaiC (Fig. 9A), with a low value at the onset of the light period and a high value at the onset of the dark period.
A. Circadian clock genes (kai and sas genes). B. Sigma factors. The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle.
Sigma factors could also significantly influence the light/dark expression of numerous cyanobacterial genes. Among the sig genes identified in the genome of M. aeruginosa PCC 7806, four sigma factors, sigB, sigD, sigE and sigH, displayed significant changes in their transcript levels during the light/dark cycle (Fig. 9B). Very similar patterns of transcript abundance were observed for sigB and sigE, with minimum values at 07:30 and maximum values at 18:30. The transcript profiles for sigD and sigH differed both from each other, and from those of sigB and sigE (Fig. 9B).
As far as we are aware, this study is the first to provide data about the overall expression of the M. aeruginosa genome during a light/dark cycle. More than 25% of the genes displayed significant variations in their transcript abundance during the 24 h cycle, most of which occurred following the dark/light transition. Similar results were reported by Stöckel et al. , who found that nearly 30% of the genes of Cyanothece sp. strain 51142 exhibited cycling behavior, and that most of them were involved in core metabolic processes (photosynthesis, respiration, energy metabolism…). On the other hand, for Prochlorococcus marinus strain MED4, which has a much smaller genome (≈1700 kb) than either Cyanothece or Microcystis (≈5000 kb), Zinser et al.  estimated that 80% of the genes displayed cyclic expression during the diel cycle. The core genome of Prochlorococcus has been estimated to consist of >1200 genes , which corresponds to more than 70% of the MED4 genome, which means that most of the genes expressing cyclic variations in MED4 belong to the core genome. Similarly, only 176 of the 1344 genes displaying significant variations in the study reported here were specific to Microcystis (i.e. were not found in any of the other twelve cyanobacterial genomes in the study of Frangeul et al. ). Collectively, these findings indicate that in cyanobacteria most of the genes displaying cyclic variations during a dark/light cycle belong to the core genome, and so are involved in basic metabolic processes. This also suggests that in cyanobacterial genera with large genomes, such as Microcystis or Cyanothece, numerous genes are likely to be involved in light-independent adaptation processes. However, as found in Cyanothece , , our findings showed that light/dark transitions play an important role in the metabolism of Microcystis.
Cyanobacteria are known to be able to perform oxygenic photosynthesis and respiration simultaneously , but a contrast between night and day was obvious in the transcript abundance of the genes involved in photosynthesis and of those involved in respiration. Indeed, the ccm and rbc genes (oxygenic photosynthesis) displayed maximum transcript abundance after the switch to light (06:30 and 07:30), whereas the cta genes (respiration), displayed maximum transcript abundances when the dark period began (18:30). Similar results were found for rbcL in Prochlorococcus  and Cyanothece  during a light-dark cycle. In the same way, most of the genes coding for components of oxidative phosphorylation, such as NADH dehydrogenase (ndh genes) and ATP synthase (atp genes), were up-regulated at the beginning of the light period, as reported in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 , . In cyanobacteria, ATP and NADPH are used in many metabolic processes including CO2 fixation. In particular, NADPH appears to be used preferentially for carbon fixation processes, rather than for respiration , . On the other hand in cyanobacterial thylakoids, the main respiratory electron transport activity into the plastoquinone pool involves the succinate dehydrogenase genes (sdh) . These genes, and others from the TCA branched pathway, displayed the same pattern of transcription as those involved in respiration (data not shown). Finally, the responses of bidirectional hydrogenase genes (HoxFUYH and hypCD) support the hypothesis that these enzymes may be involved in fermentation or respiration, rather than in photosynthesis (see the review of Tamagnini et al. ).
With regard to nutrient uptake, if, as expected, carbon metabolism occurs at the beginning of the light period, this makes it even more surprising to find ammonium assimilation occurring at the end of the light period and during the first few hours of the night. Ammonium assimilation has been clearly shown to occur in cyanobacteria (e.g. , ). In Spirulina platensis, Boussiba  found that ammonium uptake proceeded at the same rate in light and in darkness. In contrast, our result suggests that the assimilation of carbon and of ammonium occur at different times, like CO2 and N2 fixation in Cyanothece sp. ATCC 51142  and in Trichodesmium sp. strain IMS-101 . The preferential assimilation of ammonium during the night could be explained by the ecological conditions that drive the cell biology of Microcystis. This species is known to perform vertical migrations in the water column, and to be located lower down in the water column during the first few hours of the dark period . However, while an increase of phosphorus concentrations with depth has been well documented for many lakes, nothing suggests that ammonium concentrations display similar changes.
Altogether, these data suggest that light is not the sole trigger for the transcription of genes involved in photosynthesis and respiration. Indeed their transcription may also be under the control of an endogenous circadian clock, which makes it possible to anticipate their regulation in order to ensure an optimum efficiency of the processes when the changes in environmental conditions arise. The circadian clock is an endogenous biological timing mechanism found in almost all organisms , however Cyanobacteria are the simplest organisms known to exhibit circadian rhythms. The kaiABC genes have been identified as essential genetic components for circadian oscillation in most cyanobacteria . We did indeed find oscillations in the transcript abundance of the kaiB and kaiC genes, whereas there was no such significant variation for the kaiA gene, a regulator of kaiBC transcription , during the light/dark cycle. This is consistent with previous findings showing that the transcript levels of kaiBC displayed high amplitude oscillations, whereas the oscillations of the kaiA mRNA were characterized by a lower amplitude . In addition to the kaiABC locus, M. aeruginosa also possesses two paralogs of kaiB, and one of kaiC located at other loci. One of the kaiB paralogs exhibited strong periodicity, with an inverse pattern to that of the kaiABC locus, but it is not known to what extent this kaiB paralog is involved in the circadian clock process. These data do not allow us to pinpoint which specific genes of M. aeruginosa are light induced or circadian controled. A recent paper  on Cyanothece suggests on the basis of new analytical methods that most of the genes displaying peak expression in the middle of the light period are light responsive, whereas those that are up-regulated at the onset of the dark period are circadian controled. Whether this holds true for M. aeruginosa or not remains to be experimentally demonstrated.
With regard to the sigma factors, we found interesting conflicting results in the transcript abundances of the sigD and sigE genes. As reported by Imamura and Asayama , in cyanobacteria sigD contributes to the light-induced transcription of the psbA2 and psbA3 genes. This is consistent with the finding that psbA2 transcript abundance peaks at 05:30. More generally, the transcription pattern of the sigD gene, which peaks at 05:30, seems to suggest that the SigD function could be crucial for all genes displaying a light-induced transcription in cyanobacteria . With regard to the sigB and sigE genes, the fact that the transcripts peak at 18:30 is consistent with the putative function of these sigma factors in the regulation of nitrogen metabolism (Imamura & Asayama, 2009). Indeed, as we show in the present study, many genes involved in nitrogen metabolism (amt3, glnA, gltS…) display similar transcript abundance patterns to the sigB and sigE genes. However, our findings on the transcription of mcy genes and of some other genes involved in the production of secondary metabolites, do not confirm the hypothesis that SigD and SigE are involved in regulating these NRPS genes.
From a more general standpoint, this first transcriptomic study of a Microcystis species has shown that the metabolism of this cyanobacteria is clearly compartmented between the light period, during which carbon uptake, photosynthesis, and the reductive pentose phosphate pathway permit the synthesis of glycogen, and the dark period during which glycogen degradation, the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, the TCA cycle and ammonium uptake permit amino acid biosynthesis. This organization of the central metabolic pathways is very similar to that described in Cyanothece sp. strain ATCC 51142 , a unicellular marine diazotrophic species, suggesting that many cyanobacterial species may share the same central metabolic organization. More specifically, Microcystis is able to produce secondary metabolites, particularly microcystins. The fact that all the genes involved in the biosynthesis of microcystin, and also that of aeruginosin and to some extent that of cyanopeptolin, displayed the same expression pattern with clear upregulation during the light period suggests that these metabolites are essentially produced during the light period and that they may interact with the diurnal part of the central metabolism.
Another question to address is the representativeness of all the results presented in this study compared to the conditions encountered by the Microcystis cells in natural environments. Even if we have chosen to apply a moderate light irradiance to the cultures, to reproduce at the best the natural irradiance conditions, two main differences persist. The first one is the absence of progressive increase and decrease in the light intensity during the transition from dark to light and light to dark, respectively. Such experimental conditions could provoke a stress and explain that for several genes (atpA and atpG, for example) a decrease in transcript abundance was temporarily observed at 06:30. Another difference with natural conditions concerns the continuous exposition of the cells to light for 12 hours, whereas in natural aquatic ecosystems, Microcystis cells are only located at the top of the water column during the first hours of the day, before to be mixed in this water column and to have a discontinuous access to the light during the rest of the day. Interestingly, in spite of these limitations, our study clearly shows that a large part of the carbon and energy metabolism is performed in the first hours of the light period, suggesting the existence of an adaptative process controlling the daily cycle of M. aeruginosa in natural ecosystems.
List of genes with missing data. The second column, gene or gene info, shows either the gene name or brief information about the gene, and the fourth column gives the number of missing data (i.e. the value is one when data are missing data at one sampling time; this value is two when data are missing at two sampling times…). Except for the 70 genes, which have been eliminated by the flip dye consistency check, all the other genes were taken into account in the analyses.
Complete data set of our transcriptomic results. The second column, gene or gene info, shows either the gene name or brief information about the gene. The fold change (Tx/T0) is given for each gene at each sampling time. The last column (STAT) gives the result of the statistical analysis (sig: significant variation of the gene transcript abundance; ns: non significant variation of the gene transcript abundance).
1. Design of our experiment. The figure shows the various sampling times during the light (yellow)/dark (gray) cycle. T1: 0:00; T2: 5:30; T3: 6:30; T4: 7:30; T5: 12:00; T6: 18:00; T7: 24:00. 2. Variations in the transcript abundance values obtained for one gene (hypD) during the light/dark cycle. For the six biological replicates (R1 to R6), all the fold change values obtained at each sampling time for the five oligonucleotide probes designed in this gene were plotted in the figure. The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle. 3. Significant variations in the transcript abundance of genes encoding cytochrome b6f complex (pet genes) during the light/dark cycle. A: transcript abundance of the petBD gene cluster and B: transcript abundance of the petCA gene cluster. The gray shaded part of the figure represents the dark period of the light/dark cycle.
We would like to thank the Génopole of Institut Pasteur for their technical assistance. Monika Ghosh is acknowledged for improving the English version of the article.
Conceived and designed the experiments: CS PQ JV NTdM JFH. Performed the experiments: CS PQ JV. Analyzed the data: CS PQ JV NTdM JFH. Wrote the paper: CS PQ NTdM JFH.
- 1. Briand JF, Jacquet S, Bernard C, Humbert JF (2003) Health hazards for terrestrial vertebrates from toxic cyanobacteria in surface water ecosystems. Vet Res 34: 361–378.
- 2. Kuiper-Goodman T, Falconer I, Fitzgerald J (1999) Human health aspects. In: Chorus I, Bartram J, editors. Toxic cyanobacteria in water. E & FN Spon. London and New-York: pp. 41–111.
- 3. Frangeul L, Quillardet P, Castets AM, Humbert JF, Matthijs HCP, et al. (2008) Highly plastic genome of Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806, a ubiquitous toxic freshwater cyanobacterium. BMC Genomics 9: 274.
- 4. Kaneko T, Narajima N, Okamoto S, Suzuki I, Tanabe Y, et al. (2007) Complete genomic structure of the bloom-forming toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843. DNA Res 14: 247–256.
- 5. Reynolds CS, Rogers DA (1976) Seasonal variations in the vertical distribution and buoyancy of Microcystis aeruginosa Kiitz. Emend. Elenkin in Rostherne Mere. Hydrobiologia 48: 17–29.
- 6. Rabouille S, Thébault JM, Salençon MJ (2003) Simulation of carbon reserve dynamics in Microcystis and its influence on vertical migration with Yoyo model. CR Biol 326: 349–361.
- 7. Reynolds CS, Walsby AE (1975) Water-blooms. Biol Rev 50: 437–481.
- 8. Ibelings BW, Mur LR, Kinsman R, Walsby AE (1991) Microcystis changes its buoyancy in response to the average irradiance in the surface mixed layers. Arch Hydrobiol 120: 385–401.
- 9. Tan X, Kong F, Zeng Q, Cao H, Qian S, et al. (2007) Seasonal variation of Microcystis in Lake Taihu and its relationships with environmental factors. J Env Sci 21: 892–899.
- 10. Wu ZX, Song LR (2008) Physiological comparison between colonial and unicellular forms of Microcystis aeruginosa Kütz. Phycologia 47: 98–104.
- 11. Hihara Y, Kamei A, Kanehisa M, Kaplan A, Ikeuchi M (2001) DNA microarray analysis of cyanobacterial gene expression during acclimation to high light. Plant Cell 13: 793–806.
- 12. Gill RT, Katsoulakis E, Schmitt W, Taroncher-Oldenburg G, Misra J, et al. (2002) Genome-wide dynamic transcriptional profiling of the light-to-dark transition in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. J Bacteriol 184: 3671–3681.
- 13. Stöckel J, Welsh EA, Liberton M, Kunnvakkam R, Aurora R, et al. (2008) Global transcriptomic analysis of Cyanothece 51142 reveals robust diurnal oscillation of central metabolic processes. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105: 6156–6161.
- 14. Zinser ER, Lindell D, Johnson ZI, Futschik ME, Steglich C, et al. (2009) Choreography of the transcriptome, photophysiology, and cell cycle of a minimal photoautotroph, Prochlorococcus. PLoS One 4: e5135.
- 15. Rippka R, Deruelles JB, Waterbury M, Herdman M, Stanier RY (1979) Genetics assignments, strain stories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol 11: 1–61.
- 16. Quackenbush J (2002) Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet 32: s496–501.
- 17. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98: 5116–5121.
- 18. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV (2000) The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 33–36.
- 19. Kettler GC, Martiny AC, Huang K, Zucker J, Coleman ML, et al. (2007) Patterns and implications of gene gain and loss in the evolution of Prochlorococcus. PloS Gen 3: e231.
- 20. Toepel J, McDermott JE, Summerfield TC, Sherman LA (2009) Transcriptionnal analysis of the unicellular, diazotrophic cyanobacterium Cyanothece sp. ATCC 51142 grown under short day/night cycles. J Phycol 45: 610–620.
- 21. Vermaas WFJ (2001) Photosynthesis and respiration in cyanobacteria.1–7.
- 22. Kucho K, Okamoto K, Tsuchiya Y, Nomura S, Nango M, et al. (2005) Global analysis of circadian expression in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. J Bacteriol 187: 2190–2199.
- 23. Cooley J, Howitt CA, Vermaas WFJ (2000) Succinate:quinol oxidoreductases in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: presence and function in metabolism and electron transport. J Bacteriol 182: 714–722.
- 24. Tamagnini P, Leitão E, Oliveira P, Ferreira D, Pinto F, et al. (2007) Cyanobacterial hydrogenases: diversity, regulation and applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31: 692–720.
- 25. Tandeau de Marsac N, Lee HM, Hisbergues M, Castets AM, Bédu S (2001) Control of nitrogen and carbon metabolism in cyanobacteria. J Appl Phycol 13: 287–292.
- 26. Muro-Pastor MI, Reyes JC, Florencio FJ (2005) Ammonium assimilation in cyanobacteria. Photosynth Res 83: 135–150.
- 27. Boussiba S (1989) Ammonia uptake in the alkalophilic cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis. Plant Cell Physiol 30: 303–308.
- 28. Finzi-Hart JA, Pett-Ridge J, Weber PK, Popa R, Fallon SJ, et al. (2009) Fixation and fate of C and N in the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium using nanometer-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106: 6345–6350.
- 29. Pittendrigh CS (1993) Temporal organization: reflections of a Darwinian clock-watcher. Annu Rev Physiol 55: 16–54.
- 30. Brunner M, Schafmeier T (2006) Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of the circadian clock of cyanobacteria and Neurospora. Gene Dev 20: 1061–1074.
- 31. Ishiura M, Kutsuna S, Aoki S, Iwasaki H, Andersson CR, et al. (1998) Expression of a gene cluster kaiABC as a circadian feedback process in cyanobacteria. Science 281: 1519–1523.
- 32. Elvitigala T, Stöckel J, Guosh BK, Pakrasi HB (2009) Effect of continuous light on diurnal rhythms in Cyanothece sp. ATCC 51142. BMC Genomics 10: 226.
- 33. Imamura S, Asayama M (2009) Sigma factors for cyanobacterial transcription. Gene Regul Systems Biol 3: 65–87.