A common procedure in human cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) adoptive transfer immunotherapy is to expand tumor-specific CTLs ex vivo using CD3 mAb prior to transfer. One of the major obstacles of CTL adoptive immunotherapy is a lack of CTL persistence in the tumor-bearing host after transfer. The aim of this study is to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of stimulation conditions on proliferation and survival of tumor-specific CTLs.
Tumor-specific CTLs were stimulated with either CD3 mAb or cognate Ag and analyzed for their proliferation and survival ex vivo and persistence in tumor-bearing mice. Although both Ag and CD3 mAb effectively induced the cytotoxic effecter molecules of the CTLs, we observed that Ag stimulation is essential for sustained CTL proliferation and survival. Further analysis revealed that Ag stimulation leads to greater proliferation rates and less apoptosis than CD3 mAb stimulation. Re-stimulation of the CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs with Ag resulted in restored CTL proliferative potential, suggesting that CD3 mAb-induced loss of proliferative potential is reversible. Using DNA microarray technology, we identified that survivin and ifi202, two genes with known functions in T cell apoptosis and proliferation, are differentially induced between Ag- and CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs. Analysis of the IFN-γ signaling pathway activation revealed that Ag stimulation resulted in rapid phosphorylation of STAT1 (pSTAT1), whereas CD3 mAb stimulation failed to activate STAT1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that pSTAT1 is associated with the promoters of both survivin and ifi202 in T cells and electrophoresis mobility shift assay indicated that pSTAT1 directly binds to the gamma activation sequence element in the survivin and ifi202 promoters. Finally, silencing ifi202 expression significantly decreased T cell proliferation.
Citation: Zimmerman M, Yang D, Hu X, Liu F, Singh N, Browning D, et al. (2010) IFN-γ Upregulates Survivin and Ifi202 Expression to Induce Survival and Proliferation of Tumor-Specific T Cells. PLoS ONE 5(11): e14076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014076
Editor: Niels Olsen Saraiva Câmara, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Received: July 8, 2010; Accepted: October 30, 2010; Published: November 22, 2010
Copyright: © 2010 Zimmerman et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (CA133085 to K.L.) and the American Cancer Society (RSG-09-209-01-TBG to K.L.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Data from extensive studies of human cancer patients and animal models in the last two decades strongly support the existence of an intrinsic cancer immunosurveillance system that in the absence of external manipulation functions to protect the host against tumor development , . In human cancer patients, a high level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immunological effecter molecules in the tumor microenvironment is often correlated with prolonged survival, decreased disease recurrence and delayed metastasis , , . Consistent with these observations, cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) immunotherapy has been shown to effectively suppress tumor development in certain cancer patients , , , , , , . Adoptive CTL transfer immunotherapy provides the opportunity to overcome intrinsic immune suppression and tolerance mechanisms by enabling the ex vivo selection and expansion of highly tumor-reactive CTLs and has emerged as one of the potentially effective treatments for patients with metastatic cancer. However, a major obstacle to the development of effective CTL adoptive transfer immunotherapy for patients with cancer and other diseases has been the lack of persistence of the transferred CTLs in the host , , , . Although telomere lengthening and telomerase activity have been linked to CTL function and persistence , , , the molecular mechanisms underlying the lack of persistence of the tumor-reactive CTLs in the tumor microenvironment is largely unknown. Studies in human cancer patients with a nonmyeloblative but lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen before CTL adoptive transfer failed to improve CTL persistence following transfer , suggesting that factors that were intrinsic to the CTLs, perhaps the conditioning of CTLs prior to adoptive transfer, might be responsible for the lack of CTL persistence in vivo.
One of the procedures of CTL adoptive transfer immunotherapy is ex vivo expansion of the tumor-specific CTLs with CD3 mAb prior to adoptive transfer , . Because adequate stimulation mediates T cell function and survival  and polyclonal stimulation through the TCR/CD3 complex has the potential to induce T cell anergy and apoptosis , , we hypothesized that expanding the tumor-specific CTLs with CD3 mAb prior to adoptive transfer, although effective for T cell expansion, might not optimally condition the CTLs to survive in vivo after transfer. To test this hypothesis, we used experimental metastasis and CTL adoptive transfer mouse models to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor-specific CTL persistence in the tumor microenvironment. Our results suggest that the IFN-γ-signaling pathway may play a critical role in mediating CTL persistence in an autocrine manner by directly regulating survivin and ifi202 expression during T cell activation.
Female BALB/c (H-2d) mice were used in all studies and were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). Mice were housed in the Medical College of Georgia animal facility. Experiments and care/welfare were in agreement with federal regulations and an approved protocol (Protocol # 05-12-728*B) by the MCG/IACUC committee.
The cell line CMS4, kindly provided by Dr. A. Deleo (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg, PA), is a primary soft tissue sarcoma of BALB/c (H-2d) origin. CMS4-met is a highly metastatic subline derived from CMS4 tumor cell line as described . 5KC is a T cell hybridoma  kindly provided by Dr. P. Kraj (Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA). P815 was obtained from ATCC and used as a negative control cell line for CTL specificity.
Tumor-specific CD8+ CTLs
CD8+ CTLs reactive against the CMS4 tumor cells were established from wild-type (wt) BALB/c mice as previously described . Briefly, mice were immunized with viable CMS4 tumor cells (5×105 cells given s.c. on one flank) coadministered with anti-CTLA-4 mAb [affinity-purified hamster anti-mouse clone UC10-4F-11, hybridoma line provided by J. Bluestone (University of California, San Francisco, CA)] at 100 µg/inoculation/mouse given i.p. on days 0, 3, and 6 post-tumor transplant. Mice that were exposed to this regimen and failed to develop primary tumors were re-challenged on the contralateral flank with tumor cells in the absence of CTLA-4 mAb. Splenic CD8+ cell lines were derived from re-challenged mice, which showed little to no additional tumor growth. CTL cultures (2×105 cells per well) were propagated in vitro in 24-well plates by stimulation with irradiated (200 Gy) CMS4-met tumor cells (1×105 cells per well) as a source of cognate Ag, irradiated (20 Gy) syngeneic BALB/c splenocytes (5×106 cells per well) as feeder cells and IL-2 (60 IU/ml. Tecin, Hoffman-LaRoche, Nutley, NJ). CTLs were purified from dead tumor cells and spleen cells at the end of the stimulation cycle over a Ficoll gradient and re-stimulated weekly with freshly prepared irradiated tumor cells and irradiated spleen cells. For CD3 mAb stimulation, 24-well plates were coated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAbs (BD biosciences) at 1 µg/well in 250 µl PBS overnight at 4°C. CTLs were then seeded in the mAb-coated plates as in the tumor-stimulated CTLs. IL-2 (60 IU/ml) was also added to the culture.
In vitro cytotoxicity assays
CTL cytotoxicity was assessed by 51Cr-release assays as previously described . Briefly, target cells were labeled with Na251CrO4 (ICN Biomedical). CTLs were recovered from culture by centrifugation over a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient. CTLs and radiolabeled target cells were then coincubated in 96-well, U-bottom plates at various effector/target ratios. After incubation for 18 hr, supernatants were collected using a Supernatant Collection System (Skatron Co., Sterling, VA). Radioactivity was quantitated using a γ-counter. Percent specific 51Cr-release was calculated according to the following formula: % specific lysis = [(experimental cpm-spontaneous cpm)/(total cpm-spontaneous cpm)] x 100%. Total 51Cr-release was obtained by adding 0.2% Triton X-100 (final concentration) to the wells. Data are reported as the mean ± SD of triplicate wells, and representative of one of two separate experiments.
Experimental lung metastasis model
Female BALB/c (H-2d) mice were obtained from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). CTL adoptive transfer immunotherapy was carried out essentially as previously described . Briefly, CMS4-met tumor cells (2.5×105 cells/mouse) were injected into mice i.v. in 100 µl HBSS. CTLs were stimulated for 4 days and purified from the culture mixture as described above and injected to the tumor-bearing mice three days later. Mice were sacrificed at the time points indicated. Lungs were inflated with a 15% solution of India ink, resected, and fixed in Fekete's solution (60% ethanol, 10% formaldehyde, and 5% glacial acetic acid). The number of lung nodules was enumerated in all four lobes in a single-blinded fashion. Values exceeding 250 nodules were considered too numerous to count accurately and, therefore, were reported as ≥250.
Lungs were excised from tumor-bearing mice and fixed in 10% formalin. Sections were cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, tumor-bearing lungs, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Persistence of adoptively-transferred CTLs in vivo
CMS4-met tumor cells (2×105/mouse) were injected i.v. into naive mice. Five days later, CTLs were labeled with CFSE using the CellTrace™ CFSE Proliferation Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. CFSE-labeled CTLs (1×106/mouse) were injected i.v. into tumor-bearing mice. Four days later, lungs were removed and digested with an enzyme mixture containing hyaluronidase (0.1 mg/ml), collagenase (1 mg/ml), and DNase I (30 U/ml), all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, to generate single cell suspensions. The cell suspensions were then analyzed by flow cytometry to detect CFSE-positive cells.
Proliferation and apoptosis assay
CTLs were labeled with CFSE as described above. CFSE-labeled CTLs were then stimulated with either the H-2Ld-resticted peptide AH1 (SPSYVYHQF)  as antigen and irradiated spleen cells as feeder cells or with the CD3 mAb plus CD28 mAb and recombinant IL-2 as described above. Cells were stained with Annexin V-Alex Fluor 647 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) and PI three days after stimulation and analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell proliferation was then analyzed with Modfit program (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME) to compare the division times of the cells under both stimulation conditions.
3H thymidine incorporation assay
CTLs were mixed with irradiated CMS4-met cells and splenocytes as described above and seeded in flat-bottom 96-well plates at a density of 5×104 CTLs/well in 100 µl medium. Mixtures of irradiated tumor cells and splenocytes without CTLs were used as the background control. For CD3 stimulation, CTLs at the same density were seeded in CD3 and CD28 mAb-coated 96-well plates. Approximately 24 hrs later, 3H-thymidine (10 µCi/well) was added to the cell cultures and incubated for another 24 hrs. Cells were harvested and counted for 3H thymidine incorporation 3H thymidine incorporation (CPM counts) was calculated by the formula: CPM counts of the culture mixture of irradiated tumor cells, feeder cells and CTLs mixture – CPM counts of the culture mixture of irradiated tumor cell and feeder cells. Cell growth rate was also measured by MTT assay (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Cells were seeded in 96-well plates in 100 ml culture medium for approximately 48 h. MTT (10 ml) were then added and cultured for another 2–3 h. Cells were lysed with detergent and measured at OD570 according to the manufacturer's instruction.
Scramble shRNA (Cat# sc-108080) and ifi202-specific shRNA-expressing lentiviral particles were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotech (Cat# sc-40698-V). 5KC cells were transduced with the viral particles and selected for stable lines with puromycin according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis was carried out as previously described . For isolation of total RNA from stimulated CTLs, tumor-stimulated CTLs were purified with CD8 mAb-conjugated magnet beads (Invitrogen) and lysed for total RNA. CD3 mAb-stimulated cells were harvested from the plates and lysed for total RNA. The cDNA was then used as templates for PCR amplification of various genes using gene-specific primers. The following parameters were used: 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 60°C, and 1 min at 72°C. PCR amplification for all genes was first performed using 30 cycles. The PCR reactions were then repeated using less or more cycles for optimal amplification. PCR primers are listed in table 1.
Western Blot Analysis
Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) plus proteinase and phosphotase inhibitor cocktails (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) for 60 min on ice. Proteins were separated on a 4–20% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gel, and transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Anti-survivin (Santa Cruz Biotech), anti-pSAT1 (BD biosciences), anti-STAT1 (BD biosciences), and anti-β-actin mAb (Sigma) were used as the primary Abs, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-mouse or rabbit (Amersham-Pharmacia, Sunnyvale, CA) IgGs. Antiserum to p202 protein, which detects both the p202a and p202b proteins has been described . Immunodetection was performed using the ECL Plus kit (Amersham-Pharmacia).
Cell surface marker analysis
Cells were incubated with biotin-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γR mAb (BD biosciences), followed by incubation with PE/Cy5-conjugated Streptavidin (BD Biosciences, CA). Control preparations were incubated with the appropriate fluorescently labeled isotype-matched IgG. The stained cells were washed and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Genome-wide gene expression analysis
Total RNA was isolated from cells using Trizol (invitrogen) and used for cDNA probe preparation. cDNA probes were synthesized using the FairPlay microarray labeling kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The cDNA probes were then labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 monofunctional reactive dye (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The appropriate Cy3 and Cy5 labeled probes were combined and used to probe the processed mouse oligo microarray chips (approximately 36,000 sequences of transcripts). Fluorescent images were captured using a Genepix 4000 (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). Both image and signal intensity data were loaded into a database supported by the Center for Information Technology (CIT) of NIH. Cy3:Cy5 intensity ratios from each gene were calculated and subsequently normalized to ratios of overall signal intensity from the corresponding channel in each hybridization. The normalized data were then extracted from the database as text files, and analyzed using computer software JMP (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All microarray data are MIAME compliant and are deposited in GEO database (accession # GSE22890).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
ChIP assays were carried out essentially according to protocols from Upstate (Lake Placid, NY) as previously described . Briefly, cells (approximately 3×106 per assay) were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for 10 min at 37°C, lysed in SDS lysis buffer on ice for 10 min, and sonicated with a 60 Sonic Dismembrator (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The lysate was pre-cleared with a mixture of 0.04% sheared salmon sperm DNA, 0.1% BSA, and agarose-protein A beads (Upstate) for 60 min at 4°C. The pre-cleared supernatants were then incubated with anti-pSTAT1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotech) or mouse IgG mAb (5 µg antibody per assay) overnight at 4°C. A mixture (approximately 25 µl per assay) of shared DNA, BSA, and agarose-protein A beads was then added to the lysate and incubated at 4°C for 60 min. The beads were then extensively washed. The protein-DNA complexes were eluted from beads and the crosslinking was reversed. The DNA was purified from the eluted solution and used for PCR.
Protein-DNA Interaction Assay
Electrophoresis mobility shift assays (EMSA) were carried out as previously described . The end-labeled probes were incubated with nuclear extracts (20 µg) in the binding buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 50 mM NaCl, 4% Glycerol, and 0.05 mg/ml poly(dI-dC).poly(dI-dC)] for 20 min at room temperature. For specificity controls, unlabeled probe was added to the reaction at a 1∶100 molar excess. Anti-pSTAT1 mAb (Santa Cruz Biotech) was also included to identify pSTAT1-specific DNA binding. Anti-pSTAT1 was incubated with the nuclear extracts for 30 min on ice before addition of labeled probes. DNA-protein complexes were separated by electrophoresis in 6% polyacrylamide gels in 45 mM Tris borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.3. The gels were dried and exposed to a phosphoimage screen (Molecular Dynamics) and the images were acquired using a Strom 860 imager (Molecular Dynamics). The EMSA probe sequences are listed in Table 1.
Cognate Ag and CD3 mAb stimulation leads to different tumor rejection efficacy
Conventional CTL adoptive transfer cancer immunotherapy requires ex vivo expansion of tumor-specific CTLs with CD3 mAb before the CTLs are transferred to the patients , , . However, the adoptively transferred CTLs often failed to persist in the patients , . Although CD8+ T cells can be re-stimulated to rapidly expand using CD3 mAb, Ag-specific T cells often gradually stop responding to re-stimulation and enter a “senescence-like” state . Therefore, we hypothesized that the lack of persistence of adoptively transferred CTLs in the host might be due, at least in part, to the stimulation conditions of the CTLs before adoptive transfer. To test this hypothesis, we used a well-established CTL adoptive transfer and experimental lung metastasis mouse model , ,  to examine the effects of stimulation conditions on CTL persistence. These CTLs were specific for CMS4-met sarcoma tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner in vitro and exhibited potent tumor rejection efficacy against transplanted CMS4-met tumors in vivo (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, mice receiving CTL adoptive transfer immunotherapy also exhibited potent immunity against tumor re-challenge (Fig. 1B), suggesting the development of immunological memory in the tumor-challenged mice. Next, tumor-specific CTLs were stimulated with CD3 mAb in the presence of a co-stimulation signal (CD28 mAb) or with the cognate Ag (tumor cells) and analyzed for tumor rejection efficacy in vivo. As shown in Fig. 1C, the tumor-stimulated CTLs effectively rejected the transplanted tumor, whereas the CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs exhibited poor anti-tumor efficacy even at a higher dose (Fig. 1C). Histological analysis of the tumor-bearing mouse lungs revealed that metastatic foci in the lungs are effectively destroyed by tumor-stimulated CTLs (Fig. 1D, a1&2), but not by CD3 mAb-expanded CTLs (Fig. 1D, b1&2). Taken together, our data suggest that ex vivo activation conditions at least partially determine tumor rejection efficacy in vivo.
A. Lytic sensitivity of CMS4-met tumor cells to tumor-specific CTLs. Left panel: in vitro CTL cytotoxicity assay. Lytic sensitivity was assessed by 51Cr release. Tumor cell line P815 was used as a negative target control for CTL specificity. Right panel: photomicrographs of representative individual lungs of mice without (No CTL) and with (+CTL) CTL adoptive immunotherapy. B. Anti-tumor immunological memory. Mice that received tumor cell transplantation and CTL adoptive transfer immunotherapy (tumor-challenged) as shown in A and naive mice were challenged approximately 90 days after CTL immunotherapy with the CMS4-met tumor cells and analyzed for lung metastasis. The number of tumor nodules were quantified and shown at the right. Each dot represents total tumor nodule counts from a single mouse. C. Tumor-activated CTLs exhibited much greater tumor rejection efficacy than CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs. CMS4-met tumor cells were injected i.v. into mice. Three days later, saline (Control, no CTL) or tumor-specific CTLs were injected into the tumor-bearing mice i.v. at the doses indicated. CTLs were either stimulated with irradiated tumor cells or with CD3 mAbs and were adoptively transferred to the tumor-bearing mice. Shown are photomicrographs of individual lungs of mice (top panel). Bottom panel: quantification of total pulmonary nodules of individual mice as shown in top panel. Each dot represents the total tumor nodule counts from a single mouse. D. Histological analysis of lung metastasis. CMS4-met cells were injected into naïve mice iv, three days later, tumor cell-stimulated (a1 and a2) and CD3 mAb-stimulated (b1 and b2) CTLs were injected into the tumor-bearing mice, respectively. Lungs were excised one (a1 and b1) and three (a2 and b2) days after CTL adoptive transfer and subject to histological analysis with H&E staining.
Both cognate Ag and CD3 mAb can effectively activate CTLs
Suboptimal stimulation of T cells can lead to anergy or senescence in vivo , , . To determine whether the poor efficacy of CD3 mAb-expanded CTLs to reject the established tumor is due to induction of T cell anergy or senescence, CTLs were stained for cell surface expression levels of CD69 and CD25, two markers of T cell activation, at various time points after stimulation. Tumor cell-stimulated CD8+ CTLs exhibited a greater degree of CD25 activation but a lesser degree of CD69 activation compared to CD3-stimulated CTLs (Fig. 2A). However, the overall CD69 and CD25 activation kinetics are qualitatively similar between the Ag- or CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs. Thus either tumor cells or CD3 mAb effectively activated the CTLs.
A. Activation markers CD69 and CD25 expression kinetics. CTLs were stimulated with either tumor cells or CD3 mAb for the indicated time points. Cells were stained with CD8-specific mAb plus CD69- or CD25-specific mAbs, respectively. The CD8-positive cells were gated and measured for CD69 and CD25 mean fluorescent intensity (MFI). B. Analysis of expression levels of effector molecules of the cytotoxic pathways. CTLs were stimulated with either irradiated tumor cells or CD3 mAb and harvested at the indicated time points. RT-PCR analysis was carried out using gene-specific PCR primers as indicated. LTβ is also used as a normalization control.
To determine whether the poor tumor rejection efficacy of the CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs is due to lack of activation of cytotoxic effecter mechanisms, we compared activation of the cytotoxic pathways in the tumor-specific CTLs. The expression kinetics of key effecter molecules (perforin, granzyme A and granzyme B) of the perforin pathway, the Fas/FasL (FasL) cytotoxic effecter pathways, the IFN-γ (IFN-γ), TNFα and lymphotoxin (LTα, LTβ and LIGHT) signaling pathways are all very similar in CTLs under the two stimulation conditions (Fig. 2B). Taken together, our data suggest that the decreased tumor rejection efficacy of CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs is not due to defects in activation of the anti-tumor cytotoxic effecter mechanisms.
Cognate Ag stimulation is required to maintain the CTL proliferative potential
Our above observations suggest that the poor efficacy of the CD3 mAb-activated CTLs to reject tumor is not due to the activation status of the CTLs. This raises the possibility that this inability might be due to lack of persistence of the CTLs after transfer. To test this possibility, we labeled tumor- and CD3 mAb-activated CTLs with CFSE tracking dye prior to transfer into tumor-bearing mice. Four days after CTL transfer, we excised tumor-bearing lungs and made single cell suspensions. The survival of adoptively transferred CTLs was examined by analysis of the CFSE-positive CTLs in the lung tumor. The rationale is that if CTLs survive in the tumor microenvironment, they can be detected as CFSE-positive cells. Analysis of cell suspensions from the tumor-bearing lungs revealed that indeed the tumor cell-activated CTLs are present in the tumor-bearing lungs (Fig. 3A&B), in contrast, much less CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs remain in the tumor-bearing lungs.
A. CTL persistence in vivo after adoptive transfer. Tumor cell- or CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs were labeled with CFSE and injected into tumor-bearing mice. Four days later, lungs were excised from control mice (no CTL transfer, top left panel), and mice that received CD3 mAb- (top right panel) or tumor cell-stimulated- (bottom panel) CTLs, respectively. Lungs were digested into single cell suspension and analyzed for CFSE-positive cells by flow cytomotery. B. The percent of CFSE-positive cells as measured in A were quantified. Column, mean; bar, SD. ** p<0.001. n = 5 mice. C. Kinetics of CTL proliferation after activation. CTLs were stimulated with tumor cells or CD3 mAb and analyzed for 3H-thymidine incorporation over a 6-day period. D. Persistence of proliferation potential of CTLs after repeated stimulation. CTLs were stimulated with irradiated tumor cells or CD3 mAb every 7 days for a total of 4 rounds. 3H-thymidine incorporation was measured at day 2 after each re-stimulation.
The lack of persistence of the CD3 mAb-activated CTLs in the tumor-bearing hosts suggests that these CTLs either failed to proliferate or simply died in vivo , . To determine whether cognate Ag or CD3 mAb induce different proliferation profiles of the tumor-specific CTLs, we examined the proliferation kinetics of the tumor-specific CTLs after activation. The tumor cell-stimulated and CD3 mAb-activated CTLs exhibited almost identical proliferation kinetics, however, the proliferation rate is greater in the tumor cell-stimulated CTLs than the CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs (Fig. 3C). More importantly, CTLs exhibited sustained proliferation after repeated Ag stimulation, whereas repeated stimulation with CD3 mAb resulted in the quick decline of the proliferation potential of the CTLs (Fig. 3D).
Activation of T cells often results in activation-induced cell death . To determine whether antigen- and CD3 mAb-stimulated cells exhibit different apoptosis rates, the CFSE-labeled CTLs were stimulated with either the AH1 peptide or CD3 mAb and analyzed for cell division and apoptosis. AH1 peptide is the peptide that contains the epitope recognized by the CTLs used in this study . Use of peptide instead of tumor cells reduces the background for apoptosis analysis. Consistent with what was observed in 3H incorporation analysis, antigen stimulation induced faster proliferation rates than CD3 mAb stimulation (Fig. 4A). However, antigen-stimulated CTLs exhibited less apoptosis than CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs (Fig. 4B). Thus, antigen stimulation leads to greater proliferation and less apoptosis of the tumor-specific CTLs in vitro.
A–B. Proliferation profiles of tumor-specific CTLs. CTLs were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with either antigen or CD3 mAb. CTLs were analyzed for CFSE intensity 3 days after stimulation. Representative proliferation profiles are shown in A. Each division population was then quantified and presented in B. The percentage of cells in each division population is indicated at the top of the bars. C–D. Analysis of apoptosis of antigen- and CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs. The stimulated CTLs as described in A–B were stained with Annexin V and analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative apoptosis profiles are shown in C. The percentage of apoptotic cells as shown in C were quantified and presented in D. Column, mean; bar, SD.
To determine whether the reduced proliferation potential of the CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs is reversible, we stimulated the CTLs with CD3 mAb for two rounds, and then re-stimulated the CTLs with tumor cells. CTLs were then analyzed for proliferation in vitro and tumor rejection efficacy in vivo. It is clear that re-stimulation of CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs with antigen can restore the proliferation potential of the CTLs (Fig. 5A). Consistent with the restored proliferation potential, CD3 mAb-stimulated cells exhibited potent anti-tumor cytotoxicity in vivo after re-stimulation with the cognate Ag (Fig. 5B). Thus, we conclude that CD3 mAb stimulation does not result in senescence and the reduced proliferation potential of the CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs is reversible.
A. The loss of proliferation potential of CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs is reversible. The tumor-specific CTLs were re-stimulated with CD3 mAb for 2 times, followed by re-stimulation with tumor cells. Proliferation was measured by analyzing 3H-thymidine incorporation 2 days after the second tumor cell re-stimulation. Column, mean; bar, SD. B. The decreased anti-tumor cytotoxicity of CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs can be enhanced by antigen re-stimulation. CTLs were stimulated with tumor cells (Pre-tumor cell) or CD3 mAb (pre-CD3 mAb) every 7 days for 2 rounds, followed by re-stimulation with tumor cells twice more rounds before adoptive transfer. Shown are photomicrographs of individual lungs of mice. The number of tumor nodules was quantified and shown in the bottom panel. Each dot represents total tumor nodule counts from a single mouse.
Ifi202 and survivin are differentially induced by cognate Ag or CD3 mAb
Our data suggest that cognate Ag or CD3 mAb stimulation results in different proliferation potentials and susceptibility to apoptosis of the tumor-specific CTLs (Fig. 3&4). To gain a better understanding of the molecular basis of the different proliferative potentials of CTLs, we conducted genome-wide gene expression profiling of the CTLs after stimulation with tumor cells or CD3 mAb, respectively. DNA microarray analysis revealed that, although their anti-tumor efficacy is dramatically different in vivo, the gene expression kinetics of the tumor-specific CTLs stimulated with tumor cells or CD3 mAbs are surprisingly very similar (Fig. 6). The expression levels of a total of 11964 (out of 36212 genes on the array chip) were identified to be altered at least 2 fold at either 3 or 24 h after stimulation with tumor cells or CD3 mAb. However, only 392 genes (3.3%) of the 11964 genes were uniquely regulated by cognate Ag stimulation, and only 438 genes (3.7%) of the 11964 genes were differentially regulated by CD3 mAb stimulation (Fig. 6B). Taken together, our data suggest that cognate Ag and CD3 mAb induce overall similar gene expression profiles in the tumor-specific CTLs. Nevertheless, a small group of genes are uniquely associated with cognate Ag or CD3 mAb-induced activation.
A. CTLs were either stimulated with tumor cells or with CD3 mAb for the indicated time and analyzed for the genome-scale gene expression profiles using DNA microarray. Genes whose expression levels are changed by at least 2 fold (either up-regulated or down-regulated) at either time point or with either stimulation were selected. Cluster 3.0 program was used to analyze the gene expression patterns in a one-dimensional hierarchical clustering to generate gene dendrograms based on the pair-wise calculation of the Pearson coefficient of normalized fluorescence ratios as measurements of similarity and linkage clustering. The clustered data were loaded into TreeView program and displayed by the graded color scheme. B. Differential gene expression profiles between tumor cell-stimulated and CD3 mAb-activated CTLs. Genes whose expression levels were either up-regulated or down-regulated more than 2 fold in tumor cell-activated CTLs but not in CD3 mAb-activated CTLs were selected as tumor cell-regulated unique genes. Genes whose expression levels were either up-regulated or down-regulated more than 2 fold in CD3 mAb-activated CTLs, but not in tumor cell-stimulated CTLs, were selected as CD3 mAb-regulated unique genes. By these selection criteria, 93% genes are expressed at similar levels between tumor cell- or CD3 mAb-activated CTLs. Approximately 3.3% (a total of 392 genes/transcripts) are antigen-regulated unique genes and 3.7% (a total of 438 genes/transcripts) are CD3 mAb-regulated unique genes.
We next focused on genes with known functions in cellular proliferation and/or apoptosis. Two such genes: ifi202 and survivin, were identified. Western blotting and RT-PCR analysis confirmed that the degree of up-regulation of both ifi202 and survivin are greater in tumor-activated CTLs than in CD3 mAb-activated CTLs (Fig. 7A). Because expression of ifi202 is predicted to be up-regulated by IFN-γ , , , we next sought to determine whether differential ifi202 activation is due to different IFN-γR levels in the CTLs after tumor cells or CD3 mAb stimulation. Flow cytometry analysis indicates that IFN-γR is highly expressed in the CTLs and stimulation resulted in decreased IFN-γR level in the CTLs. However, tumor cell- and CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs expressed similar levels of IFN-γR (Fig. 7B). IFN-γ was activated in the CTLs after stimulation and the IFN-γ activation kinetics are similar under the two activation conditions (Fig. 7C). Thus, the observed difference in expression levels of ifi202 between tumor cell- and CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs are unlikely due to a difference in IFN-γR levels expressed by the CTLs. IFN-γ binding to the IFN-γR leads to STAT1 phosphorylation. The phosphorylated STAT1 dimerizes and translocates to the nucleus to activate target genes . To determine whether STAT1 is differentially activated in CTLs, we examined STAT1 phosphorylation kinetics in the CTLs after activation. Western blotting analysis revealed that STAT1 is quickly activated in tumor cell-stimulated CTLs, but not in CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs (Fig. 7C). Taken together, our data suggest that the cognate Ag stimulation induces STAT1 activation, whereas CD3 mAb is unable to activate STAT1 and thus results in defective IFN-γ signaling in the CTLs, which might be responsible, at least in part, for the lack of ifi202 and survivin up-regulation in the activated CTLs.
A. RT-PCR and Western blotting analysis of ifi202 and survivin expression level during CTLs activation. CTLs were stimulated with either tumor cells or CD3 mAb for the indicated time and analyzed by RT-PCR (left panel) and Western blotting (right panel). B. Cell surface IFN-γR staining of CTLs. CTLs were either un-stimulated (0 h) or stimulated with tumor cells or CD3 mAb for 24 h, respectively. The CTLs were then double stained with anti-CD8- and anti-IFN-γR-specific mAbs. The figure is representative of three IFN-γR staining profiles of CD8+ cells. Bottom panel: the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of IFN-γR was quantified and shown as mean±SD. Column: mean; bar, SD. P<0.001. C. STAT1 is preferentially activated in tumor cell-activated CTLs. CTLs were activated as in A and analyzed for IFN-γ transcript level by RT-PCR (left panel) and for phosphorylated STAT1 level by Western blotting analysis (right panel). The Western blot shown is representative of two separate experiments.
STAT1 directly regulates survivin and ifi202 expression
Our above observations indicate that survivin expression in the tumor-specific CTLs is not only differentially induced by tumor cells and CD3 mAb stimulation (Fig. 7A) but also correlated with STAT1 activation (Fig. 7C), suggesting that survivin might also be a target gene of the IFN-γ signaling pathway. To test this hypothesis, we used the T cell line 5KC  to examine the role of the IFN-γ signaling pathway on survivin expression. Flow cytometry analysis indicates that IFN-γR is highly expressed on the cell surface of 5KC cells, and treatment of 5KC cells with recombinant IFN-γ induced STAT1 phosphorylation (pSTAT1) and increased STAT1 expression (Fig. 8A). Furthermore, IFN-γ treatment also increased ifi202 and survivin expression (Fig. 8A). Thus, 5KC T cells resemble the tumor-specific CTLs in terms of IFN-γ signaling and survivin and ifi202 expression, and thus is a model system to study regulation of ifi202 and survivin expression. pSTAT1 is a transcription factor that binds to a consensus sequence termed Gamma Activation Sequence or GAS (TTC(n2-4)GAA) . To determine whether pSTAT1 binds directly to the survivin gene promoter, we identified the survivin gene sequence from the mouse genome sequence database. Analysis of the promoter region of the survivin gene using the MacVector program identified a GAS element located between -1287 to -1279 relative to the survivin gene transcription initiation site (Fig. 8B). Analysis of pSTAT1 association with the chromatin region containing this GAS element using ChIP revealed that pSTAT1 is associated with this region of the chromatin in 5KC cells (Fig. 8B). To determine whether pSTAT1 binds directly to this GAS DNA element of the survivin promoter, we synthesized oligonucleotides containing this GAS element and made a double-stranded probe. Incubation of nuclear extract derived from IFN-γ-treated 5KC cells and analysis of pSTAT1 and the GAS probe interaction using EMSA showed that pSTAT1 binds specifically and directly to this GAS element (Fig. 8B). Taken together, our data suggest that survivin is a direct target gene of the IFN-γ signaling pathway during T cell activation.
A. IFN-γ induces ifi202 and survivin expression in T cells. T cell line 5KC was stained for IFN-γR protein level (top panel), and treated with IFN-γ for the time indicated and analyzed for STAT1 activation (middle panel) and induction of ifi202 and survivin (bottom panel). B. IFN-γ-activated STAT1 (pSTAT1) binds to the survivin promoter region. Top left panel: survivin promoter structure. Number above the bar indicates nucleotide positions relative to survivin transcription initiation site. The GAS element location and the ChIP PCR region are indicated under the bar. Bottom left panel: ChIP analysis of pSTAT1 association with the survivin promoter. 5KC cells were treated with IFN-γ for approximately 24 h and analyzed by ChIP with pSTAT1-specific mAb and survivin promoter-specific PCR. Right panel: EMSA of pSTAT1 and the GAS element of the survivin promoter. Nuclear extracts were prepared from untreated (lanes 2 and 8) and IFN-γ-treated (lanes 3–7 and 9) 5KC cells. Nuclear extracts were incubated in the presence of isotype control IgG mAb (lane 4), anti-pSTAT1 mAb (lane 5), excess cold probe (lane 6) and mutant cold probe (lane 7). Lanes 1–7: probe of survivin promoter GAS element. Lanes 8 and 9: probe of IRF8 GAS element. C. IFN-γ-activated STAT1 binds to the ifi202 5′-regulatory region. Top panel: ifi202 regulatory region structure. Number above the bar indicates nucleotide positions relative to ifi202 transcription initiation site. The GAS elements and the ChIP PCR-amplified regions are indicated under the bar. Bottom panel: ChIP analysis of pSTAT1 association with the survivin promoter. 5KC cells were treated with IFN-γ for approximately 24 h and analyzed by ChIP with pSTAT1-specific mAb and ifi202 gene-specific PCR.
Although expression of the ifi202 is predicted to be up-regulated by IFN-γ , it is not fully understood how IFN-γ regulates ifi202 expression. We analyzed the 5′-regulatory region of the ifi202 gene and identified 7 potential GAS elements in the upstream 5000 nucleotide sequence relative to the potential ifi202 gene transcription initiation site (Fig. 8C). ChIP analysis indicated that pSTAT1 is associated with the promoter region near the transcription start site (Fig. 8C). Thus, IFN-γ-activated STAT1 is also directly associated with the ifi202 5′-regulatory region to regulate ifi202 expression.
Silencing ifi202 expression decreased T cell proliferation
It is known that increased expression of ifi202 inhibits apoptosis , , . We observed here a positive correlation between p202 protein level and CTL persistence (Fig. 7). To determine whether the p202 protein mediates T cell proliferation and survival, we silenced the ifi202 expression with ifi202-specific shRNA (Fig. 9A). It is clear that silencing ifi202 expression significantly inhibited 5KC T cell proliferation (p<0.01). Thus, ifi202 plays a direct role in T cell proliferation and/or survival.
A. Silencing of ifi202 expression by ifi202-specific shRNA. 5KC cells were transduced with scramble shRNA-expressing lentiviral particles (5KC.scramble) and ifi202-specific shRNA (5KC.ifi202.shRNA), respectively. The transduced cells were selected with puromycin for stable lines and analyzed for ifi202 expression by RT-PCR. B. Silencing ifi202 expression decreased T cell proliferation. 5KC.scramble and 5KC.ifi202.shRNA cells were seeded in 96-well plates at the indicated density in the presence of IFN-γ (100 U/ml) for approximately 48 h and analyzed by MTT assay. ** p<0.01. C. Cells were seeded in a 96-well plate as described in B at a density of 3×103 cells/well and measured for 3H incorporation. ** p<0.01.
It is a well-established concept that T cells require Ag and co-stimulation signals for activation and proliferation. It has also been shown that a third molecular signal such as IL-2 is required for optimal T cell activation and proliferation . In this study, we observed that stimulation of tumor-specific CTLs through the TCR/CD3 complex and co-stimulation molecule CD28 resulted in suboptimal proliferation and subsequent loss of proliferative potential. This activation-induced non-responsiveness is apparently not due to lack of IL-2 production by the activated CTLs since recombinant IL-2 is included in the culture medium. Furthermore, this non-responsive state is reversible by Ag stimulation, suggesting that the non-responsive CTLs are not senescent. It is known that re-stimulation of T lymphocytes through the TCR/CD3 complex also induces activation-induced cell death (AICD) and AICD is mediated by Fas/FasL-mediated apoptosis . In this study, we observed that FasL is quickly up-regulated in both Ag- and CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs (Fig. 2B) and a portion of the proliferating CTLs are apoptotic (Fig. 4C). It seems that CD3 mAb stimulation results in less proliferation and more apoptosis than Ag stimulation, which might at least partially explain the decreased tumor rejection efficacy of the CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs.
To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying CD3 mAb stimulation-induced non-responsiveness of the tumor-specific CTLs, we carried out genome-wide gene expression analysis and observed that ifi202 and survivin, two genes with known function in apoptosis and proliferation, are differentially expressed between Ag- and CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs. Ifi202 is an IFN-inducible protein and plays a role in the regulation of apoptosis , , . Inhibition of the endogenous ifi202 increased susceptibility to apoptosis induction , and overexpression of ifi202 in cells induced to undergo p53-dependent apoptosis significantly delayed this process , suggesting that ifi202 functions as an apoptosis inhibitor. In this study, we observed that ifi202 is quickly up-regulated in tumor-specific CTLs after antigenic stimulation. Therefore, the lack of ifi202 up-regulation in CD3 mAb-stimulated CTLs might contribute to the lack of CTL persistence in the tumor microenvironment (Fig. 3A) and decreased tumor rejection efficacy in vivo (Fig. 1).
Survivin expression is strictly regulated in T cells and plays an essential role in T cell maturation, survival and proliferation , , , , , , . Survivin-deficient cells exhibited cell cycle arrest and increased cell death , and blocking survivin suppressed T cell proliferation and led to apoptosis . These observations thus suggest that survivin plays an important role in T cell maturation, activation and apoptosis. Consistent with these observations, Ag-reactive T cells expressing survivin exhibited long-term survival and displayed enhanced anti-tumor activity . In this study, we observed that survivin is rapidly up-regulated in tumor-specific CTLs after antigenic stimulation. Up-regulation of survivin is associated with sustained proliferation potential of the CTLs and is correlated with tumor-specific CTL persistence in the tumor microenvironment and tumor rejection efficacy in vivo. CD3 mAb stimulation apparently activated the tumor-specific CTLs (Fig. 2A) and the cytotoxic effecter mechanisms (Fig. 2B). However, CD3 mAb-activated tumor-specific CTLs failed to up-regulate survivin, which might explain, at least partially, why CD3 mAb-activated tumor-specific CTLs failed to persist in cancer patients after adoptive transfer .
The above studies strongly suggest that the expression of survivin is tightly regulated during T cell activation. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of survivin expression are not entirely clear. Our study indicates that survivin is directly regulated by IFN-γ. Engagement of the IFN-γR leads to receptor α-chain dimerization, association of β-chains, transphosphorylation of the receptor-associated JAK kinases, and ultimately to phosphorylation and dimerization of STAT1, which is then translocated to the nucleus as an active transcription factor . Therefore, STAT1 is a key mediator of the IFN-γ-initiated signaling pathway. We demonstrated that IFN-γ-activated STAT1 binds directly to a GAS element in the survivin promoter region to activate survivin expression (Fig. 8). IFN-γ is secreted by activated T cells (Fig. 7C). Thus, survivin expression during T cell activation is regulated by the activated T cell-secreted IFN-γ in an autocrine manner. Our data indicate that IFN-γ can quickly induce STAT1 phosphorylation in antigen-activated CTLs but not in CD3 mAb-activated CTLs (Fig. 7C). Therefore, the lack of survivin up-regulation in CD3 mAb-activated CTLs is likely due to the lack of STAT1 activation. The molecular mechanism underlying the failure of CD3 mAb to induce STAT1 activation remains to be determined. Nevertheless, our results indicate a novel role of IFN-γ during T cell activation: regulating survivin expression to maintain CTL proliferation potential and suppress apoptosis.
It has been shown that CD8+ effector cells expressing survivin and bcl-xL exhibit greater proliferation rates and long-term survival advantages. The survivin and bcl-xL-expressing T cells also exhibit greater tumor rejection efficacy . We also observed that survivin up-regulation is associated with increased proliferation and enhanced tumor rejection efficacy. Furthermore, our data suggest that survivin expression in T cells is regulated by IFN-γ. Therefore, survivin-mediated T cell proliferation potential might be a general phenomenon. The role of bcl-xL in regulating tumor-specific CTL proliferation and tumor rejection efficacy is not investigated in this study.
It has been well-demonstrated that IFN-γ plays an essential role in suppressing tumor development , ,  and that IFN-γ signaling on tumor cells is important for IFN-γ-mediated anti-tumor activity. It is also known that IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling on host immune cells is essential for the development of anti-tumor lytic effecter cells . Type I IFNs have also been shown to provide a third signal directly to CTLs via a STAT4-dependent pathway for CTL survival, function and IFN-γ production . However, how IFN-γ regulates effecter cells is not well-defined. It is known that co-stimulation is required for T cell proliferation, survival and differentiation. Co-stimulation induces expression of bcl-xL and survivin and thus promotes cell survival , . In this study, we observed that stimulation of tumor-specific CTLs with CD3 mAb in the presence of a costimulation signal from CD28 failed to maintain CTL proliferation in vitro and persistence in vivo. In contrast, stimulation with tumor cells maintained CTL proliferation potential and persistence. Furthermore, CTL-produced IFN-γ directly up-regulates survivin and ifi202 expression in an autocrine manner. Therefore, it seems that IFN-γ might function as a “third signal” to mediate CTL proliferation and survival , . Our data suggest that IFN-γ might execute its anti-tumor function, at least partially, through regulating survivin and ifi202 expression to maintain T cell persistence in the tumor microenvironment. We demonstrated that IFN-γ activates STAT1 to directly regulate survivin and ifi202 expression during Ag-mediated T cell activation. Up-regulation of survivin might be essential for CTL proliferation potential and persistence in the tumor microenvironment, whereas up-regulation of ifi202 might prevent or delay apoptosis of activated T cells. Thus, our observations suggest a novel function of the IFN-γ signaling pathway in maintaining CTL persistence and might aid in designing survivin and ifi202-based strategies to maintain CTL persistence to enhance CTL function in cancer immunotherapy.
We thank Dr. Jeanene Pihkala for her excellent technical assistance in flow cytometry analysis of cells, and Kimberly Smith for histological analysis of tumor tissues.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MZ DB VG SA KL. Performed the experiments: MZ DY XH FL PC. Analyzed the data: MZ NS PC DC KL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NS DB DC. Wrote the paper: MZ VG DC SA KL.
- 1. Shankaran V, Ikeda H, Bruce AT, White JM, Swanson PE, et al. (2001) IFN-γ and lymphocytes prevent primary tumour development and shape tumour immunogenicity. Nature 410: 1107–1111.
- 2. Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD (2004) The Three Es of Cancer Immunoediting. Annu Rev Immunol 22: 329–360.
- 3. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, et al. (2006) Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science 313: 1960–1964.
- 4. Strater J, Hinz U, Hasel C, Bhanot U, Mechtersheimer G, et al. (2005) Impaired CD95 expression predisposes for recurrence in curatively resected colon carcinoma: clinical evidence for immunoselection and CD95L mediated control of minimal residual disease. Gut 54: 661–665.
- 5. Camus M, Tosolini M, Mlecnik B, Pages F, Kirilovsky A, et al. (2009) Coordination of intratumoral immune reaction and human colorectal cancer recurrence. Cancer Res 69: 2685–2693.
- 6. Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP, Yang JC, Morgan RA, Dudley ME (2008) Adoptive cell transfer: a clinical path to effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 299–308.
- 7. Leen AM, Rooney CM, Foster AE (2007) Improving T cell therapy for cancer. Annu Rev Immunol 25: 243–265.
- 8. Mukherji B, Guha A, Chakraborty NG, Sivanandham M, Nashed AL, et al. (1989) Clonal analysis of cytotoxic and regulatory T cell responses against human melanoma. J Exp Med 169: 1961–1976.
- 9. Boon T, Coulie PG, Van den Eynde BJ, van der Bruggen P (2006) Human T cell responses against melanoma. Annu Rev Immunol 24: 175–208.
- 10. Schumacher TN, Restifo NP (2009) Adoptive T cell therapy of cancer. Curr Opin Immunol 21: 187–189.
- 11. June CH, Blazar BR, Riley JL (2009) Engineering lymphocyte subsets: tools, trials and tribulations. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 704–716.
- 12. Appay V, Douek DC, Price DA (2008) CD8+ T cell efficacy in vaccination and disease. Nat Med 14: 623–628.
- 13. Yee C, Thompson JA, Byrd D, Riddell SR, Roche P, et al. (2002) Adoptive T cell therapy using antigen-specific CD8+ T cell clones for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: in vivo persistence, migration, and antitumor effect of transferred T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16168–16173.
- 14. Robbins PF, Dudley ME, Wunderlich J, El-Gamil M, Li YF, et al. (2004) Cutting edge: persistence of transferred lymphocyte clonotypes correlates with cancer regression in patients receiving cell transfer therapy. J Immunol 173: 7125–7130.
- 15. Rolle CE, Carrio R, Malek TR (2008) Modeling the CD8+ T effector to memory transition in adoptive T-cell antitumor immunotherapy. Cancer Res 68: 2984–2992.
- 16. Wrzesinski C, Paulos CM, Kaiser A, Muranski P, Palmer DC, et al. (2010) Increased intensity lymphodepletion enhances tumor treatment efficacy of adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells. J Immunother 33: 1–7.
- 17. Shen X, Zhou J, Hathcock KS, Robbins P, Powell DJ Jr, et al. (2007) Persistence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in adoptive immunotherapy correlates with telomere length. J Immunother 30: 123–129.
- 18. Fauce SR, Jamieson BD, Chin AC, Mitsuyasu RT, Parish ST, et al. (2008) Telomerase-based pharmacologic enhancement of antiviral function of human CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol 181: 7400–7406.
- 19. Parish ST, Kim S, Sekhon RK, Wu JE, Kawakatsu Y, et al. (2847-2854)
- 20. Curtsinger JM, Mescher MF (2010) Inflammatory cytokines as a third signal for T cell activation. Curr Opin Immunol 22: 333–340.
- 21. Wesselborg S, Janssen O, Kabelitz D (1993) Induction of activation-driven death (apoptosis) in activated but not resting peripheral blood T cells. J Immunol 150: 4338–4345.
- 22. Lee PP, Yee C, Savage PA, Fong L, Brockstedt D, et al. (1999) Characterization of circulating T cells specific for tumor-associated antigens in melanoma patients. Nat Med 5: 677–685.
- 23. Ryan MH, Bristol JA, McDuffie E, Abrams SI (2001) Regression of extensive pulmonary metastases in mice by adoptive transfer of antigen-specific CD8(+) CTL reactive against tumor cells expressing a naturally occurring rejection epitope. J Immunol 167: 4286–4292.
- 24. White J, Pullen A, Choi K, Marrack P, Kappler JW (1993) Antigen recognition properties of mutant Vβ3+ T cell receptors are consistent with an immunoglobulin-like structure for the receptor. J Exp Med 177: 119–125.
- 25. Yang D, Stewart TJ, Smith KK, Georgi D, Abrams SI, et al. (2008) Downregulation of IFN-γR in association with loss of Fas function is linked to tumor progression. Int J Cancer 122: 350–362.
- 26. Liu K, Caldwell SA, Greeneltch KM, Yang D, Abrams SI (2006) CTL Adoptive Immunotherapy Concurrently Mediates Tumor Regression and Tumor Escape. J Immunol 176: 3374–3382.
- 27. Yang D, Ud Din N, Browning DD, Abrams SI, Liu K (2007) Targeting lymphotoxin β receptor with tumor-specific T lymphocytes for tumor regression. Clin Cancer Res 13: 5202–5210.
- 28. Yang D, Thangaraju M, Greeneltch K, Browning DD, Schoenlein PV, et al. (2007) Repression of IFN regulatory factor 8 by DNA methylation is a molecular determinant of apoptotic resistance and metastatic phenotype in metastatic tumor cells. Cancer Res 67: 3301–3309.
- 29. Choubey D, Lengyel P (1993) Interferon action: cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of the interferon-inducible 52-kD protein that is encoded by the Ifi 200 gene from the gene 200 cluster. J Interferon Res 13: 43–52.
- 30. McGough JM, Yang D, Huang S, Georgi D, Hewitt SM, et al. (2008) DNA methylation represses IFN-γ-induced and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1-mediated IFN regulatory factor 8 activation in colon carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Res 6: 1841–1851.
- 31. Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF, Yang JC, Hwu P, et al. (2002) Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 298: 850–854.
- 32. Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Topalian SL, et al. (2005) Adoptive cell transfer therapy following non-myeloablative but lymphodepleting chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 23: 2346–2357.
- 33. Zhou J, Shen X, Huang J, Hodes RJ, Rosenberg SA, et al. (2005) Telomere length of transferred lymphocytes correlates with in vivo persistence and tumor regression in melanoma patients receiving cell transfer therapy. J Immunol 175: 7046–7052.
- 34. Effros RB, Allsopp R, Chiu CP, Hausner MA, Hirji K, et al. (1996) Shortened telomeres in the expanded CD28-CD8+ cell subset in HIV disease implicate replicative senescence in HIV pathogenesis. AIDS 10: F17–F22.
- 35. Caldwell SA, Ryan MH, McDuffie E, Abrams SI (2003) The Fas/Fas ligand pathway is important for optimal tumor regression in a mouse model of CTL adoptive immunotherapy of experimental CMS4 lung metastases. J Immunol 171: 2402–2412.
- 36. Driessens G, Kline J, Gajewski TF (2009) Costimulatory and coinhibitory receptors in anti-tumor immunity. Immunol Rev 229: 126–144.
- 37. Mescher MF, Popescu FE, Gerner M, Hammerbeck CD, Curtsinger JM (2007) Activation-induced non-responsiveness (anergy) limits CD8 T cell responses to tumors. Semin Cancer Biol 17: 299–308.
- 38. Deeths MJ, Kedl RM, Mescher MF (1999) CD8+ T cells become nonresponsive (anergic) following activation in the presence of costimulation. J Immunol 163: 102–110.
- 39. Effros RB, Pawelec G (1997) Replicative senescence of T cells: does the Hayflick Limit lead to immune exhaustion? Immunol Today 18: 450–454.
- 40. Chen J, Panchanathan R, Choubey D (2008) Stimulation of T cells up-regulates expression of Ifi202, an interferon-inducible lupus susceptibility gene, through activation of JNK/c-Jun pathway. Immunol Lett 118: 13–20.
- 41. Xin H, D'Souza S, Jorgensen TN, Vaughan AT, Lengyel P, et al. (2006) Increased expression of Ifi202, an IFN-activatable gene, in B6.Nba2 lupus susceptible mice inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis. J Immunol 176: 5863–5870.
- 42. Choubey D, Panchanathan R (2008) Interferon-inducible Ifi200-family genes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Lett 119: 32–41.
- 43. Borden EC, Sen GC, Uze G, Silverman RH, Ransohoff RM, et al. (2007) Interferons at age 50: past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6: 975–990.
- 44. Kanno Y, Levi BZ, Tamura T, Ozato K (2005) Immune cell-specific amplification of interferon signaling by the IRF-4/8-PU.1 complex. J Interferon Cytokine Res 25: 770–779.
- 45. Xin H, Pramanik R, Choubey D (2003) Retinoblastoma (Rb) protein upregulates expression of the Ifi202 gene encoding an interferon-inducible negative regulator of cell growth. Oncogene 22: 4775–4785.
- 46. Veeranki S, Choubey D (2010) Systemic lupus erythematosus and increased risk to develop B cell malignancies: role of the p200-family proteins. Immunol Lett 133: 1–5.
- 47. Dhein J, Walczak H, Baumler C, Debatin KM, Krammer PH (1995) Autocrine T-cell suicide mediated by APO-1/(Fas/CD95). Nature 373: 438–441.
- 48. Koul D, Lapushin R, Xu HJ, Mills GB, Gutterman JU, et al. (1998) p202 prevents apoptosis in murine AKR-2B fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 247: 379–382.
- 49. D'Souza S, Xin H, Walter S, Choubey D (2001) The gene encoding p202, an interferon-inducible negative regulator of the p53 tumor suppressor, is a target of p53-mediated transcriptional repression. J Biol Chem 276: 298–305.
- 50. Kobayashi Y, Yukiue H, Sasaki H, Fukai I, Yokoyama T, et al. (2002) Developmentally regulated expression of survivin in the human thymus. Hum Immunol 63: 101–107.
- 51. Kornacker M, Verneris MR, Kornacker B, Scheffold C, Negrin RS (2001) Survivin expression correlates with apoptosis resistance after lymphocyte activation and is found preferentially in memory T cells. Immunol Lett 76: 169–173.
- 52. Okada H, Bakal C, Shahinian A, Elia A, Wakeham A, et al. (2004) Survivin loss in thymocytes triggers p53-mediated growth arrest and p53-independent cell death. J Exp Med 199: 399–410.
- 53. Song J, So T, Cheng M, Tang X, Croft M (2005) Sustained survivin expression from OX40 costimulatory signals drives T cell clonal expansion. Immunity 22: 621–631.
- 54. Xing Z, Conway EM, Kang C, Winoto A (2004) Essential role of survivin, an inhibitor of apoptosis protein, in T cell development, maturation, and homeostasis. J Exp Med 199: 69–80.
- 55. Zhao B, Song A, Haque R, Lei F, Weiler L, et al. (2009) Cooperation between molecular targets of costimulation in promoting T cell persistence and tumor regression. J Immunol 182: 6744–6752.
- 56. Song J, Lei FT, Xiong X, Haque R (2008) Intracellular signals of T cell costimulation. Cell Mol Immunol 5: 239–247.
- 57. Boehm U, Klamp T, Groot M, Howard JC (1997) Cellular responses to interferon-γ. Annu Rev Immunol 15: 749–795.
- 58. Winter H, Hu HM, McClain K, Urba WJ, Fox BA (2001) Immunotherapy of melanoma: a dichotomy in the requirement for IFN-γ in vaccine-induced antitumor immunity versus adoptive immunotherapy. J Immunol 166: 7370–7380.
- 59. Fallarino F, Gajewski TF (1999) Cutting edge: differentiation of antitumor CTL in vivo requires host expression of Stat1. J Immunol 163: 4109–4113.
- 60. Curtsinger JM, Valenzuela JO, Agarwal P, Lins D, Mescher MF (2005) Type I IFNs provide a third signal to CD8 T cells to stimulate clonal expansion and differentiation. J Immunol 174: 4465–4469.
- 61. Parry RV, Rumbley CA, Vandenberghe LH, June CH, Riley JL (2003) CD28 and inducible costimulatory protein Src homology 2 binding domains show distinct regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Bcl-xL, and IL-2 expression in primary human CD4 T lymphocytes. J Immunol 171: 166–174.