Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Combining Substrate Specificity Analysis with Support Vector Classifiers Reveals Feruloyl Esterase as a Phylogenetically Informative Protein Group

  • Roberto Olivares-Hernández,

    Affiliation Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

  • Hampus Sunner,

    Affiliation Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

  • Jens C. Frisvad,

    Affiliation Center for Microbial Biotechnology, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

  • Lisbeth Olsson,

    Affiliation Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

  • Jens Nielsen,

    Affiliation Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

  • Gianni Panagiotou

    Affiliation Center for Microbial Biotechnology, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Combining Substrate Specificity Analysis with Support Vector Classifiers Reveals Feruloyl Esterase as a Phylogenetically Informative Protein Group

  • Roberto Olivares-Hernández, 
  • Hampus Sunner, 
  • Jens C. Frisvad, 
  • Lisbeth Olsson, 
  • Jens Nielsen, 
  • Gianni Panagiotou



Our understanding of how fungi evolved to develop a variety of ecological niches, is limited but of fundamental biological importance. Specifically, the evolution of enzymes affects how well species can adapt to new environmental conditions. Feruloyl esterases (FAEs) are enzymes able to hydrolyze the ester bonds linking ferulic acid to plant cell wall polysaccharides. The diversity of substrate specificities found in the FAE family shows that this family is old enough to have experienced the emergence and loss of many activities.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In this study we evaluate the relative activity of FAEs against a variety of model substrates as a novel predictive tool for Ascomycota taxonomic classification. Our approach consists of two analytical steps; (1) an initial unsupervised analysis to cluster the FAEs substrate specificity data which were generated by cultivation of 34 Ascomycota strains and then an analysis of the produced enzyme cocktail against 10 substituted cinnamate and phenylalkanoate methyl esters, (2) a second, supervised analysis for training a predictor built on these substrate activities. By applying both linear and non-linear models we were able to correctly predict the taxonomic Class (∼86% correct classification), Order (∼88% correct classification) and Family (∼88% correct classification) that the 34 Ascomycota belong to, using the activity profiles of the FAEs.


The good correlation with the FAEs substrate specificities that we have defined via our phylogenetic analysis not only suggests that FAEs are phylogenetically informative proteins but it is also a considerable step towards improved FAEs functional prediction.


Microorganisms are estimated to make up more than one-third of Earth's biomass [1]. They play essential roles in the cycling of nutrients, interact intimately with animals and plants, and directly influence Earth's climate. Fungi are one of the most ancient and diverse groups of eukaryotic organisms [2]. While their fossil remains extend back to 600 mya [3], the origin of fungi may be estimated, by phylogenetic reconstruction using a molecular clock, to be 1.5 bya or, before [4]. The recognition, delimitation and typification of fungi have been formidable problems since the discovery of these organisms. Despite the great variability in form and function- many fungi are saprobes, others are pathogens or mutualistic symbionts of plants and insects [5]- systematic studies based upon morphology and life cycle resulted, by the mid 20th century, in a manageable number of major phyla.

Ascomycota (most yeasts and molds), Basidiomycota (mushrooms, smuts and rusts), Zygomycota, Chytridiomycota, and a number of taxa regarded as more ancestral forms constituted the group of organisms that were considered to be true fungi [5]. The Ascomycota are a large and important group of fungi, distinguished from other fungi by a saclike ascus containing haploid ascospores [5]. The Ascomycota encompass over 32,000 species, amounting for 40% of all described fungi [6][7] and its members form symbiotic, parasitic, and saprobic associations with green algae cyanobacteria and other organisms [5]. Ascomycota present a challenge to taxonomists because few morphological characters appear to be phylogenetically informative. Phylogenetic trees obtained from sequences of individual and multiple sets of genes do not show clustering as per class, order and family either. As a result, conflicting classification schemes have been proposed for the higher categories of Ascomycota [8][9].

Until recently, our understanding of the fungal Tree of Life has been based on two approaches, which basically differ in number of species and genes considered: (i) few genes and large number of species and (ii) large number of genes and few species. Regarding the first approach unfortunately the rationale behind the selection of these protein coding genes is not always clear, and discrepancies and incongruence between individual gene trees may result in unresolved phylogenetic trees [10][11]. In the second approach, a large selection of genes and/or proteins are concatenated and used for inferring phylogenetic relationships, thereby increasing the phylogenetic signal considerably [12][15]. However, this approach does not take into consideration the evolutionary history of each individual gene and it depends on the availability of complete genome data. Therefore, newly discovered fungi can not be easily taxonomically classified based on sequences of individual genes.

In this study we evaluate the relative activity of feruloyl esterases (FAEs, E.C. against a variety of model substrates as a novel predictive tool of the Ascomycota taxonomic classification. Several fungal FAEs, responsible for cleaving the ester-link between the polysaccharides main chain of xylans and monomeric or dimeric ferulic acid, have been purified and partially characterized [16]. These enzymes exhibit different hydrolysis profiles against a wide range of model substrates, depending on: (a) changes in the type and the number of substitutions on the benzene ring, (b) changes in the distance between the ester bond and the benzene ring, and (c) change of the aliphatic region from saturated to unsaturated [17]. We examined the relationships between Ascomycota and FAE and to what extent the substrate specificity of FAEs is a biomarker of the known taxonomy. The described method does not depend on molecular sequences but on the whole enzymatic FAEs activity of a given fungal cell culture.

Here we explore the usefulness of the varied degree of hydrolysis towards these model substrates of FAEs to gain a more complete understanding of the relationships among fungal class, order, and family. We illustrate that the application of biostatistics and novel data-handling frameworks has a strong role in the extraction of biologically meaningful information from moderate-size data sets. In this study we demonstrate for the first time, with the use of advanced machine learning tools, that the substrate specificity of just one enzyme class, the FAEs, accurately reflects organismal relationships.

Results and Discussion

Evaluation of single gene phylogeny using known and putative FAEs-amino acid sequences

A BLASTP search [18] was performed against all the fungal proteins in the non-redundant database of NCBI (, and the Broad Institute ( using default parameters, with the 10 available amino acid sequences of the previously characterized fungal FAEs as input [19]. All hits above an E-value of 10−40 were discarded and unique and non-identical hits were retrieved. The blast analysis identified 149 unique proteins, mostly in the taxonomic classes of Eurotiomycetes (61) and Sordariomycetes (53) but several also of Dothideomycetes (15), Agaricomycetes (11), Leotiomycetes (5), Neocallimastigomycetes (3) and Ustilaginomycetes (1). To investigate the phylogenetic history of the putative FAEs proteins, we carried out a phylogenetic analysis of the sequences from the above representative taxonomic classes by arranging them in a Minimum Evolution Cladogram (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Phylogeny of putative fungal proteins selected by BLAST from NCBI and the Broad Institute using 10 known FAE amino acid sequences as the BLAST query (sequences indicated by a dagger, †).

149 unique putative proteins with a blast expect value ∼10−40 to any of the queries were aligned and a maximum likelihood phylogeny constructed as the consensus cladogram having at least 70% support in 100 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap support (%) is shown at internal nodes. For each sequence, the organism, accession number and taxonomic class are shown. For biochemically characterized FAEs, the type A–D, is also indicated. Sequences have been colored according to taxonomic class.

The four current classes of FAE sequences [16] have different evolutionary origin. This is evident from the cladogram of all the sequences found in the BLAST searches, which is divided into a number of distinct major clades, each with at least 85% bootstrap support. These major clades are numbered I–V from north to south.

In clade I, 7 aspergilli FAEs sequences form a well-confirmed group nested with the one sequence of the penicillium genus. This clade received bootstrap support values of 79% and 76% in two phylogenetic trees and included the three biochemically characterized members, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus awamori and Aspergillus tubingensis FAEs. The latter have been classified according to Crepin et al., [16] as type A (sequence similarity to lipases, induction on wheat bran, ability to hydrolyse the MFA, MSA, and MpCA, ability to release 5-5′-di-ferulic acid). Also some higher-order relationship is recovered with significant support in clade I, since all the members belong to the class of Eurotiomycetes. However, a putative FAE sequence from Laccaria bicolor belonging to the Agaricomycetes class shows high similarity with the above Eurotiomycetes sequences.

Clade II consists of an equal mix of Sordariomycetes (29 sequences) and sequences from each of the other main taxonomic classes, predominantly from Eurotiomycetes (15 sequences), intermixed with only minor clades belonging to a single taxonomic class. The clade also contains the only Ustilaginomycetes sequence found in this analysis. To some extent, sequences from the same taxonomic class cluster together, but there is a little intra-specific structure in the phylogeny, which means that hardly any taxonomic class-specific signatures could be attributed to the FAEs sequences. Similarly to clade I, the biochemically characterized sequences of clade II belong to a single FAE type. The FAEs from both Penicillium funiculosum and Neurospora crassa are type B (a sequence similarity to Carbohydrate Esterase Family 1, induction on sugar beet pulp, ability to hydrolyse the MFA, MpCA, and MCA, no ability to release di-ferulic acids).

The only sequence of FAE class D used as BLAST query (Q9Y871 from Piromyces equi) does not produce any significant hits in the blast search (data not shown) and appears in the dendrogram as a terminal node. The other sequences from the Neocallimastigomycetes class also appear as singular leaf nodes and are not more closely related to each other than to the rest of the sequences. These anaerobic rumen fungi are also ecologically and physiologically very different from other fungi.

The analysis of the next two clades, III and IV, demonstrate that it is not possible to determine the phylogenetic origin of a FAE based on the amino acid sequence of the protein. Clade III is composed of sequences from Eurotiomycetes, Sordariomycetes and Leotiomycetes in two clades supported by bootstrap values of 89% and 81%, respectively. Furthermore, as seen in Figure 1 the genes in clade III have branches longer than those of the genes in the other clades, indicating a higher rate of evolution. Clade IV has bootstrap values of 92%, 98% and 99% in the three clades and includes putative FAE from four taxonomic classes. A group of proteins from Fusarium, Phaeospheria, Pyrenophora and Magnaporthe occupies the bottom position of this clade. The additional interesting point in clade IV is the concomitant presence of sequences biochemically characterized as type B and type C. This finding indicates that information obtained by the substrate specificity and biochemical characterization of the FAE enzymes is not reflected in the primary amino acid sequence. All the biochemically characterised enzymes in the topmost part of clade IV belong to the Eurotiomycetes-only cluster of 15 sequences, of which four are described as FAE B sequences and two as FAE C. Together with the only characterised non-Eurotiomycetes sequence in the intermediate tree (FOXT_12213, FAE class C) the phylogeny shows that, for this branch, the sequence difference between the two specificities is small.

At the bottom of the phylogeny, clade V contains 24 sequences of which none have been biochemically characterised to date. This clade consists of a mix of taxonomic classes representative of the phylogeny and similar to that of clade II and IV.

Based on our analysis it could be claimed that in the most recent ancestor prior to the divergence of Ascomycota to different taxonomic classes there were at least four FAEs. Additionally, it is evident from the phylogenetic analysis that the amino acid sequences of FAEs is not an efficient descriptor to cluster the different Ascomycota strains based on their taxonomic class that they belong to.

Functional characterization of the feruloyl esterase cocktail produced by different Ascomycota

In order to test our hypothesis that the FAE specificity is a phylogenetically informative feature we selected 34 Ascomycota strains from our fungal collection. The strains used in this study belong to three different classes (Dothideomycetidae, Eurotiomycetes, Sordariomycetes), four orders (Capnodiales, Pleosporales, Eurotiales, Hypocreales), and six families (Mycosphaerellaceae, Pleosporaceae, Trichocomaceae, Incertae sedis, Nectriaceae, Hypocreaceae) while as Table 1 indicates they cover a wide range of different genera, including Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium, Trichoderma, etc. All the strains were cultivated at the same FAE-inducible substrate, namely brewer's spent grain (BSG) until sufficient fungal growth was observed. Subsequently, the enzyme cocktail produced by each organism was screened for FAE enzymatic activity against a number of model substrates commonly used for this class of enzymes [17]. The characterization of each strain was based on the ability of the respective FAE cocktail to release phenolic acids from 10 substituted cinnamate and phenylalkanoate methyl esters. We use the word “cocktail” even though the specific strains evaluated in our study have not been sequenced and hence precise determination of the number of FAEs in each strain is not possible. However, a careful inspection of Figure 1 supports our assumption that more than one FAEs are present in each strain (e.g. there are 9, 7 and 2 putative FAE genes for Aspergillus niger CBS513.88, Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus nidulans, respectively, while 6 and 7 for Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium verticillioides, respectively, and 4 for Penicillum marneffei), Thus the observed enzymatic activities are a combined effect of multiple FAEs and relaxed specificity of the enzymes. The structures of each substrate, which are diversified by the substitutions on the benzene ring, are shown in Figure 2. Since the optimization of the FAE production for each strain was beyond the scope of this study the values in Figure 2 indicating the enzyme activity are normalized (0–1), however, the raw data can be found in File S1. For each strain an arbitrary value of 1 was given to the substrate that the particular strain was shown the highest activity in U/mg of total protein, and the values for the rest of the substrates were scaled based on this. With the exception of methyl-4-hydroxy benzoate, indicated with green font in Figure 2, towards which no strain presented any activity against, for all the other methyl esters (red font) at least one strain was able to produce a FAE mixture that showed hydrolytic activity against the substrates. As can be observed from Figure 2, the ability to produce diverse types of FAEs, necessary to hydrolyze the esteric bond of substrates with minor structural alterations, varies for each microorganism. From the studied strains, on the on hand there were Ascomycota with broad FAE-substrate promiscuity, like Alternaria arborescens, Ulocladium consortiale and Aspergillus foetidus, which showed activity against 7 of the 10 tested substrates. On the other hand, several of the other Aspergillus strains presented very narrow substrate specificity with more impressive member of this group of “narrow-minded” strains the Acremonium sp. which could produce FAEs acting only against methyl-4-hydroxy cinnamate and methyl-3,4-dihydroxy cinnamate (Figure 2). These two substrates, in addition to methyl-3-hydroxy cinnamate and methyl-4-hydroxy-3-methoxy cinnamate could be considered as the easiest to be hydrolyzed by FAEs since almost all the strains demonstrated a general preference for them. Since there are no other reports on strain characterization based on the substrate specificity of a produced FAEs mixture, we can compare our findings only with studies on isolated FAEs. In such a study Topakas et al., [17] characterized the substrate specificity of two Fusarium, two Sporotrichum, and two Aspergillus FAEs and in agreement with our findings concluded that, with the exception of the AnFaeA, the four aforementioned substrates contain the required substitutions on the benzene ring for correct alignment of the substrate ester bond in the FAE respective active sites so there is a preference for them.

Figure 2. Relative feruloyl esterase activity of the 34 Ascomycota against 10 model substrates.

For the substrate at which each strain shows the highest activity an arbitrary value was set to 1 and the activity against all the other substrates were scaled based on this. The red font in the structure indicates that at least one of the examined strains showed activity against this substrate, whereas, the green font indicates that none of the strains has demonstrated activity. Substrate (1): methyl-2-hydroxy cinnamate, (2): methyl-4-hydroxy benzoate, (3): methyl-3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamate, (4): methyl-4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy cinnamate, (5): methyl-4-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzoate, (6): methyl-4-hydroxy cinnamate, (7): methyl-3,4-dihydroxy cinnamate, (8): methyl-4-hydroxy phenyl acetate, (9): methyl-3-hydroxy cinnamate, (10) methyl-4-hydroxy-methoxy cinnamate.

Table 1. Taxonomic classification of the 34 Ascomycota used in this study.

Clustering of Ascomycota based on the FAEs substrate specificity

The FAE relative specificities against 10 substituted cinnamate and phenylalkanoate methyl esters were used to cluster our dataset of 34 Ascomycota strains. Clustering is an unsupervised data analysis technique in machine learning that attempts to group the objects based on their common traits; in this case the substrate specificity profiles. Given that there is no initial bias or predefined output, unsupervised methods are not prone to false correlations. Clustering is thus a useful technique for navigating in a dataset, evaluating its diversity and the regularities among its components and getting an overview of the information carried by the variables that describe it. The identified clusters can then form the basis for deriving a hypothesis for the development of a predictive model for new data of the same type.

As it is shown in Figure 3, the 34 Ascomycota strains were distributed into 6 clusters, where each cluster has a characteristic profile of substrate specificity. Cluster 0 contains only one strain (Penicillium montanense) which is characterized by specificity on substrate 8 (methyl-4-hydroxy phenyl acetate). This specie is associated to conifer trees [20], unlike the other species of Penicillium included in this study. Cluster 1 contains four strains with a selective profile towards substrates 3 (methyl-3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamate), 4 (methyl-4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy cinnamate) and 10 (methyl-4-hydroxy-methoxy cinnamate). Both Trichoderma strains are found in this cluster, whereas the other two strains belong to the same taxonomic Class, Order and Family (Penicillium neopurpurogenum and Aspergillus foetidus). Cluster 2 is composed of three strains –two of which are the Aspergillus brasiliensis and Aspergillus thermomutatus (Eurotiomycetes, Eurotiales, Trichocomaceae)- that show a strong selectivity to substrate 7 (methyl-3,4-dihydroxy cinnamate). In the same cluster we also find the Cladosporium herbarum. Cluster 3 is the largest of the six, with 11 members which are characterized by a wide specificity profile, with high activity on substrate 9 (methyl-3-hydroxy cinnamate) and lower activities to 6 (methyl-4-hydroxy cinnamate), 7 (methyl-3,4-dihydroxy cinnamate) and 10. This cluster can be further divided in two sub-clusters: in the north one we find the four Alternaria strains clustered together with the two Ulocladium. These six strains taxonomically belong to the same Class (Dothideomycetes), Order (Pleosporales) and Family (Pleosporacae). In the south sub-cluster the genus of Fusarium together with the genus of Acremonium is met. The three Fusarium and the two Acremonium strains belong to the same taxonomic Class (Sordariomycetes) and Order (Hypocreales) but different Families (Nectriaceae and Incertae sedis). Lastly, Clusters 4 and 5 consist of the majority of Aspergillus and Penicillium strains, and the Cladosporium cladosporioides strain. Cluster 4 is characterized by high activity on substrate 7 and lower activities on substrates 6 and 9. Members of Cluster 5 have a wide specificity profile towards a lot of substrates, with high relative activity on at least two of them. It should be noted that Penicillia related to both Eupenicillium and Talaromyces are present in Cluster 4 and 5 despite the fact that they are phylogenetically distantly related, as they do often occupy the same plant niches [21].

Figure 3. Clustering of 34 Ascomycota strains (in rows) based on the produced enzyme cocktail against 10 substituted cinnamate and phenylalkanoate methyl esters (in columns, S1 to S10 correspond to substrates as given in Table 2).

In parenthesis next to the strain names, a three-letter code is given that corresponds to the Class-Order-Family the strain belongs to. The full names for Class, Order and Family are provided in Table 1. Different strengths of red correspond to the degree of activity on the respective substrate in relation to the activities on the rest of the substrates.

From the above analysis we can conclude that there is a range of characteristic selectivity profiles of the 34 Ascomycota strains towards the ten tested substrates. In most cases, strains of the same taxonomic rank have very similar substrate specificity profiles. Exceptions are the Cladosporium strains that do not seem to share a common pattern and the P. montanense that forms a separate cluster, from the other Penicillium species. These other Penicillium species, and Cladosporium species are more prominent in deciduous forests, especially on leaf litter [21]. A dendrogram such as the one shown in Figure 3 can assist us in predicting the selectivity profile of a yet untested strain, based on its phylogenetically classification. For example, a new strain of the Fusarium genus is expected to have the selectivity profile of the south part of Cluster 3.

At the same time, Figure 3 gives us information about the relatedness of the substrates in respect to the FAE specificity. Substrates 6 and 7 are very similar to each other and so are substrates 9 and 10, with the level of activity against these substrates to be linked (e.g when a strain is showing lower activity against substrate 7 in comparison with another strain, it will also show lower activity against substrate 6). On the other hand, substrate 8 seems to have a very unique mode of binding, as a strain that is specific to it, does not show (significant) activity on any of the other tested substrates.

Prediction of the class, order, and family by applying diverse classifiers

The FAE relative specificities of the 34 Ascomycota of Table 1 were evaluated as descriptors for developing a model to predict the taxonomic ranks (Class, Order, Family) for each strain. The observation of the natural clustering of the samples shown above was a guide towards whether it is feasible to build an accurate predictor of the taxonomy based on the given information. Four different models were used to classify the 34 organisms. The strains were grouped in different classes based on the evolutionary tree for each taxonomic category. Two categories of classifiers were applied: linear (Logistic and Linear Perceptron) and non-linear models (SMO and Multilayer perceptron). In Table 2 the performance of the linear and non-linear models is shown. The first conclusion is that the Support Vector classifier, using the relative FAE substrate activities, shows the best performance (Table 2) and the models correctly classify (>85% correct classification) the 34 strains according to the taxonomic Class, Order and Family that they belong to. In Table 2 the performance of linear and non-linear models using a MLP classifier is also compared. In the case of MLP, the linear model performs slightly better compared to the non-linear cases, with 82.4% versus 79.4% correct predictions of the taxonomic Class and 76.4% versus 67.7% correct predictions of the taxonomic Family, respectively, while no difference was observed in the prediction accuracy of the taxonomic Order (82.4%). This is not surprising since it is quite possible a problem initially thought as highly complex that can actually be solved by linear as well as non-linear techniques, like neural networks [22][23]. Nevertheless, these results must be taken in a conservative manner as the over-fitting using MLP models, is always possible.

Table 2. Performance of the different classification methods across the taxonomical categories.

As mentioned above, the 34 strains were classified in three different taxonomic Classes: Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, and Sordariomycetes. Using the SMO models, it was possible to correctly classify 29 out of the 34 strains (Table 2). The missclassfied strains belong to the Dothideomycetes (Cladosporium herbarum and Cladosporium cladosporioides) and Eurotiomycetes (Penicillium montanense, Penicillium neopurpurogenum and Penicillium neopinophilum) taxonomic Classes, while all the 7 Sordariomycetes were correctly predicted. In the case of the classification according to the taxonomic Order, the SMO model classified correctly the 30 out of the 34 strains reaching the impressive 88.2% of correct classification. The misclassified strains belong to the taxonomic Order of the Capnodiales (Cladosporium herbarum and Cladosporium cladosporioides) and the Eurotiales (Penicillium montanense and Penicillium neopurpurogenum) but a 100% correct classification was achieved for the Pleosporales and the Hypocreales strains. For the classification based on the taxonomic Order it is possible that the inability to correctly classify the Capnodiales strains was due to the very small number of the members of the particular Order. For the case of classifying the strains according to their taxonomic Family, the SMO model predicted again correctly the 30 out of the 34 strains. The four misclassified were again the strains Cladosporium herbarum and Cladosporium cladosporioides (Mycosphaerellaceae), followed by Penicillium neopurpurogenum (Trichocomaceae) and Acremonium zeae (Incertae sedis). In summary, it appears that the diverse substrate specificity of the FAE family is a phylogenetically informative feature. It is therefore possible to train SMO models of high accuracy, using the relative activities of FAEs, to classify strains according to their Class, Order or Family. It was also observed that Cladosporium herbarum and Cladosporium cladosporioides strains were constantly misclassified for all the methods of classification (see File S2). In the case of Class, the model assigned these two strains to the taxonomic Class of Eurotiomycetes and in the case of taxonomic Order, to the Hypocreales. Similarly, Penicillium montanense and Penicillium neopurpurogenum are misclassified in almost all the methods, with two exceptions (see File S2).

In this context, after having obtained initial or preliminary classification results for a given biological system, one is often left weighting the possibility of embarking on a larger and more systematic study using additional samples. While the 34 strains were carefully selected to cover most of the genus with human interest either as industrial producers of useful compounds or harmful parasites (e.g Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium) they only belong to three namely Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, and Sordariomycetes, of the ten known Classes that the Pezizomycotina subphylum is organized. It is of great importance in order to demonstrate the broad applicability of our classification method to include members also from Arthoniomycetes, Laboulbeniomycetes, Lecanoromycetes, Leotiomycetes, Lichinomycetes, Orbiliomycetes, and Pezizomycetes. If we further attempt to include members grouped in a different Order for each Class and subsequently of different Family, the final number of strains will increase exponentially requiring a revision of the experimental set up. A microfermentation platform based on 96-well plates will definitively be more suitable for such an extensive study even though this cultivation approach in fungi suffers from other limitations (aeration, agitation, reproducibility, etc). However certain Orders, such as Eurotiales and Dothidiales should be well represented, as they have already given many promising candidates for enzyme production, and cover many ecological niches. Other Orders, especially the yeasts, including Saccharomycetales and Schizosaccharomycetales, are generally less chemically differentiated and produce few extracellular enzymes, and should be deemphasized. Another challenge of attempting a large scale evaluation of our hypothesis would be the high-throughput determination of the FAE activity. While in our study we used 10 model substrates to monitor the substrate specificity of FAEs there are more than 30 substrates where FAEs have demonstrated activities [17] and is general belief that there are many more to be discovered.

In addition to the biological relevance, increasing the size of the dataset is the best way to avoid overfitting of the algorithm with the rule-of-thumb to have at least 30 times as many training cases as there are weights in the network (10 times in our study); however for noise-free data, 5 times as many training cases as weights may be sufficient. Furthermore, in machine learning, building empirical scaling models called learning curves is a natural way to study classification accuracy as a function of the training set size. Learning curves estimate the empirical error rate as a function of training set size for a given classifier and dataset. These learning curves are usually well characterized by inverse power-laws:The variables are the expected error rate e(n) given n training samples, the learning rate a, the decay rate α, and the Bayes error b which is the minimum error rate achievable. The advantage of this approach is that one avoids making assumptions about the distribution generating the dataset or the distribution of the classification errors. This inverse-power-law learning behaviour appears to be universal and is observed for many classifiers and types of datasets and it could be a possible way also in our proof-of-concept study to predict the performance of the classifier when trained with additional samples (will the accuracy of the SMO improve significantly? Is the effort to collect additional samples worthwhile?).

Even though the focus of our discussion up to this point has been the prediction of the taxonomy using the different reaction specificities of FAEs, the above results can also be seen vice versa. In cases where the taxonomy of the strains is well defined with reliable morphological features a prediction of the functionality of the FAEs cocktail present in each strain could be made possible. During the last decade, FAEs have gained increased attention in the area of biocatalytic transformations for the synthesis of hydroxycinnamic acid esters with medicinal and nutritional applications. Feruloylation of D-arabinose by a FAE and its potential application as anti-mycobacterial agent has recently been demonstrated [24]. Furthermore, the potential of a FAE as a synthetic tool of various phenolic esters and their inhibitory effect on LDL (Low-Density-Lipoproteins) oxidation has been investigated in vitro in relation to prevention of atherosclerosis [25]. Since FAE synthetic activity is observed in the same structures where hydrolytic activity is feasible, our study could provide researchers and industries with an additional tool to select microbial sources of FAEs for suitable reactions and applications.

The molecular functions of enzymes are the result of a complex evolutionary interplay between environmental constraints, requirements for organismal fitness, and the functional malleability of a particular enzyme scaffold. Within these constraints, existing enzymes are recruited during evolution to perform new or modified functions, while often maintaining some aspects of the ancestral function. In addition to the study of conservation patterns in FAE sequences, we have examined the patterns of conservation and variation in enzyme function by analyzing the substrate specificity of FAEs produced by a large number of ascomycota. The clustering created by the 149 FAEs amino acid sequences retrieved from NCBI did not reflect the phylogeny of the organisms in which they occur. On the contrary our analysis on the conservation of the enzymatic activity against substrate substructures in ascomycota, focusing on the FAEs family, precisely determines aspects of taxonomy, as Class, Order and Family. As such, it provides a view of conservation and divergence different from the view afforded by more common types of studies focused on enzyme sequences and structures. While our data set of ascomycota strains and the FAEs associated substrates is relatively large, it is still limited as new reactions for this promiscuous enzyme family are discovered through the isolation and biochemical characterization of novel FAEs. In addition isolation of novel FAEs could be made based on ecological consideration based on the question: where are feruloyl esterases likely to be encountered? Furthermore, our results can be updated and improved by expanding our analysis to more fungal taxa and although it is beyond the scope of this study a valuable extension would be the correlation of the conservation patterns we see in FAEs substrates with the conservation patterns in their respective sequences. This could guide us to identify conserved motifs in the FAEs sequences that are directly connected with functional characteristics of the respective enzyme and to develop models that are able to elucidate the underlying structural characteristics that determine substrate specificities.

Materials and Methods


All names are mentioned under their anamorph name in all tables and figures, except Fig. 1. Some of the Penicillium species and one Aspergillus species have not yet been described: P. apiculatum, P. neopurpurogenum, P. neopinophilum, P. thujae, P. telluricum and Aspergillus bahamensis. P. apiculatum, P. macrosporum ( = Talaromyces macrosporus), P. neopinophilum and P. neopurpurogenum are all phylogenetically closely related to Talaromyces, and P. asperosporum, P. montanense, P. purpurescens, P. telluricum and P. thujae are related to each other and the genus Eupenicillium.Talaromyces and Eupenicillium are phylogenetically very distantly related despite their common Penicillium genus [26][27]. The overall classification followed that of Kirk et al. [26].

Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

The sequences were aligned using default parameters [29]. The phylogeny was reconstructed in PhyML version 3.0-exporté (2009-07-06) [30] using JTT as the amino acid substitution model, estimating amino acid frequency and proportion of invariable sites. One hundred bootstraps were made starting from a maximum parsimony tree. All branches with less than 70% bootstrap support were collapsed and the tree was visualized using ATV/Archaeopteryx [31]. Sequence similarity was assessed using ClustalW2, available at [].

Strains and Cultivation Conditions

From the fungal collection at the Center for Microbial Biotechnology-DTU 34 strains (IBT numbers) were used in the present study (Table 1). The stock culture was maintained on potato-dextrose-agar (PDA) at 4°C.

A three-step cultivation procedure was employed. In the first step, each fungus was grown on PDA plates for 4 days at 30°C. In the second step, 20 ml deionised sterile water, was added to a PDA plate and aliquots (10 ml) of the spore suspension were used to inoculate Erlenmeyer flasks (250 ml) containing 20 g/L glucose and 100 ml of medium solution containing (g/l): KH2PO4 2, (NH4)2SO4 1.4, Urea 0.3, MgSO4 • 7H2O 0.3, CaCl2 0.3, peptone 0.75, yeast extract 0.25, FeSO4 • 7H2O 0.005, MnSO4 • H2O 0.0015, ZnSO4 • 7H2O 0.0014, CoCl2 0.002. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 5. The flasks were incubated at 30°C for 28 h in an orbital shaker (150 rpm) for mycelium production.

In the third step, an inoculum of mycelium suspension (5%, v/v) was added to the enzyme production medium in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks (100 ml medium) and incubated at 30°C for 6 days in an orbital shaker (200 rpm). The carbon source at this step was 20 g/L Brewer's spent grain. Cultures were carried out in duplicate.

Chemicals and Enzyme Assays

Methyl-2-hydroxy cinnamate, methyl-4-hydroxy benzoate, methyl-3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamate, methyl-4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy cinnamate, methyl-4-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzoate, methyl-4-hydroxy cinnamate, methyl-3,4-dihydroxy cinnamate, methyl-4-hydroxy phenyl acetate, methyl-3-hydroxy cinnamate, and methyl-4-hydroxy-methoxy cinnamate were purchased from Apin Chemicals Ltd. (Abingdon, UK) and Sigma-Aldrich (Denmark A/S), respectively.

The esterase activities in the supernatant of the fungal cultivations were assayed using the above substrates and the release of the acids measured by HPLC as previously described [32], except that incubations were performed at 40°C for 60 min. All assays were prepared and analyzed in duplicate, with 10% standard error for each set of results. The amount of free acid released was quantified against standard curves. One unit of activity (1U) is defined as the amount of enzyme (mg) or milliliter of culture supernatant releasing 1 µmol of free acid per minute under the defined conditions.

The total amount of protein in the supernatant was measured according to the Bradford method.

Hierarchical Clustering

Hierarchical clustering was performed with the vcluster program from the Cluto clustering toolkit v.2.1.1 ( The selected algorithm is based on the application of a direct clustering technique. In a direct clustering, the desired k-way clustering solution is computed by simultaneously finding all k clusters. In terms of quality, for small values of k as it is in our case, the direct approach leads to better clusters than those obtained by repeated bisections or the agglomerative approach.

We optimized the following clustering criterion function:Where k is the total number of clusters, Si is the set of objects assigned to the ith cluster, v and u represent two objects and sim(v, u) is the similarity between two objects, which is computed using the cosine function.

The number of clusters was set to six, equal to the number of Ascomyota families in the dataset. This produced a good ratio between internal similarities (average similarity between the objects in each cluster) and external similarities (average similarity of the objects of each cluster and the rest of the objects).


Four different classifiers were applied to each of the four distinct datasets where the organisms were grouped according to three taxonomic categories: Class, Order and Family. The classifiers were selected from the WEKA toolbox for the classification procedure [33]. As an exploratory strategy we applied two non-linear classifiers: Multilayer Perceptron and Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO); and two linear classifiers: Logistic regression and Multilayer Perceptron in a linear form.

Multilayer Perceptron is a back-propagation artificial neural network. Two scenarios can be covered in the network, linear models if zero hidden layers are applied and non-linear models for 1 hidden layer or more. The optimal parameters for Multilayer Perceptron are shown in Table 3. Learning rate is the parameter that controls the step size when weights of the hidden neurons are iteratively adjusted, and the momentum is the weight applied during updating which, sometimes, gives the ability to escape from local minimum. Logistic regression is a multinomial regression model and it is used for prediction by fitting data to a logistic curve.

Table 3. Optimal parameters for the Multilayer Perceptron for the different taxonomic categories.

SMO is a non linear method developed for training Support Vector Machines [34]. Table 4 lists the optimal parameters for this classifier. The complexity coefficient is an upper limit that restricts the influence of the support vectors on the shape of the regression function controlling the trade-off between the prediction error ε (which it is a fix value of 1E-12) and the tube's flatness. Polynomial kernel was used to train the support vector machines.

Table 4. Optimized parameters for the Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO) for the different taxonomic categories.

There is no consensus regarding which is the best cross-validation method, therefore, for every classifier two methods of validation were compared as part of the classification procedure, leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation and 10 fold cross-validation (TF). Both are holdout methods that aim to reserve a fraction of the data for testing and use the rest for training. LOO omits one data object from the training set at each step of the training whereas TF holds 1/10 of the data. The omitted object is used to validate the performance of the model constructed from the remaining ones.

Supporting Information

File S1.

Feruloyl esterase activity in mU/mg of total protein of the 34 Ascomycota against a number of cinnamate and phenyl alkanoate methyl esters.

(0.03 MB XLS)

File S2.

The table shows the strains that were misclassified (in red) and correctly classified across the different taxonomies and classifiers. These results are based on Table 5.

(0.11 MB DOC)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GP. Performed the experiments: GP. Analyzed the data: ROH HS LO JN GP. Wrote the paper: ROH JCF GP.


  1. 1. Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (1998) Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 6578.
  2. 2. Hawksworth DL (2001) The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1–5 million species estimated revisited. Mycological Research 105: 1422–1432.
  3. 3. Yuan X, Xiao S, Taylor TN (2005) Lichen-like symbiosis 600 million years ago. Science 308: 1017–1020.
  4. 4. Heckman DS, Geiser DM, Eidell BR, Stauffer RL, Kardos NL, et al. (2001) Molecular evidence for the early colonization of land by fungi and plants. Science 293: 1129–1133.
  5. 5. Alexopoulos CJ, Mims CW, Blackwell M (1996) Introductory mycology. 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons.
  6. 6. Honegger R (1991) Functional aspects of the lichen symbiosis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42: 553–578.
  7. 7. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Ainsworth & Bisby's Dictionary of the fungi. Wallingford: 10th ed. , CAB International.
  8. 8. Barr ME (1990) Prodromus to nonlichenized, pyrenomycetous members of class Hymenoascomycetes. Mycotaxon 39: 43–184.
  9. 9. Eriksson O, Hawksworth DL (1993) Outline of the Ascomycetes. Syst Ascomycet 12: 1–257.
  10. 10. Tehler A, Little DP, Farris JS (2003) The full length phylogenetic tree from 1551 ribosomal sequences of chitinous fungi. Mycol Res 107: 901–916.
  11. 11. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (2003) Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the Saccharomyces complex determined from multigene sequence analysis. FEMS Yeast Res 3: 417–432.
  12. 12. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Caroll SB (2003) Genome scale approaches to resolving incongruence inmolecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798–804.
  13. 13. Kuramae EE, Robert V, Snel B, Weib M, Boekhout T (2006) Phylogenomics reveal a robust fungal tree of life. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 1213–1220.
  14. 14. Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME, Stajich JE, Butler G (2006) A fungal phylogenu based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6: 99.
  15. 15. Robbertse B, Reeves JB, Schoch CL, Spatafora JW (2006) A phylogenomic analysis of the Ascomycota. Fungal Genet Biol 43: 715–725.
  16. 16. Crepin VF, Faulds CB, Connerton IF (2004) Functional classification of microbial feruloyl esterases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63: 647–652.
  17. 17. Topakas E, Christakopoulos P, Faulds CB (2005) Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic feruloyl esterases: characterization of their substrate specificity for methyl phenylalkanoates. J of Biotechnology 115: 355–366.
  18. 18. Altschul SE, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–402.
  19. 19. Benoit I, Danchin EG, Bleichrodt RJ, de Vries RP (2008) Biotechnological applications and potential of fungal feruloyl esterases based on prevalence, classification and biochemical diversity. Biotechnology Letters 30: 387–96.
  20. 20. Chrisensen M (1962) A new Penicillium from coniferous forest soils. Mycologia 54: 573–577.
  21. 21. Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson T-H (2007) Compendium of soil fungi. IHW-Verlag, Eching.
  22. 22. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall.
  23. 23. Fausset L (1994) Fundamentals of Neural Networks. New York: Prentice Hall.
  24. 24. Vafiadi C, Topakas E, Alderwick LJ, Besra GS, Christakopoulos P (2007) Chemoenzymatic synthesis of feruloyl D-arabinose as a potential anti-mycobacterial agent. Biotechnol Lett 29: 1771–1774.
  25. 25. Vafiadi C, Topakas E, Alissandratos A, Faulds CB, Christakopoulos P (2008) Enzymatic synthesis of butyl hydroxycinnamates and their inhibitory effects on LDL-oxidation, J Biotechnol 133: 497–504.
  26. 26. LoBuglio KF, Taylor JW (1993) Molecular taxonomy of Talaromyces and Penicillium species in subgenus Biverticillium. In: Reynolds DR, Talor JW, editors. The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. Oxon: CAB Interantional. pp. 115–120.
  27. 27. Peterson SW (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of Penicillium species based on on ITS and LSU-DRNA nucleotide sequences. In: Samson RA, Pitt JI, editors. Integration of modern taxonomic methods for Penicillium and Aspergillus classification. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publ.. pp. 163–178.
  28. 28. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Dictionary of the fungi, CAB International, Wallingford.
  29. 29. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792–7.
  30. 30. Desper R, Gascuel O (2002) Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J Comput Biol 9: 687–705.
  31. 31. Zmasek CM, Eddy SR (2001) ATV: display and manipulation of annotated phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 383–384.
  32. 32. Kroon PA, Faulds CB, Brezillon C, Williamson G (1997) Methyl phenylalkanoates as substrates to probe the active sites of esterases. Eur J Biochem 248: 245–251.
  33. 33. Witten IH, Frank E (2005) Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
  34. 34. Platt J (1998) Machines using Sequential Minimal Optimization, In B. Schoelkopf and C. Burges and A. Smola Editors.