Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Effect of Pharmaceutical Potential Endocrine Disruptor Compounds on Protein Disulfide Isomerase Reductase Activity Using Di-Eosin-Oxidized-Glutathion

  • Danièle Klett,

    Affiliation Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unit « Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements », Nouzilly, France

  • Claire Cahoreau,

    Affiliation Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unit « Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements », Nouzilly, France

  • Mélanie Villeret,

    Affiliation Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unit « Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements », Nouzilly, France

  • Yves Combarnous

    combarno@tours.inra.fr

    Affiliation Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unit « Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements », Nouzilly, France

Effect of Pharmaceutical Potential Endocrine Disruptor Compounds on Protein Disulfide Isomerase Reductase Activity Using Di-Eosin-Oxidized-Glutathion

  • Danièle Klett, 
  • Claire Cahoreau, 
  • Mélanie Villeret, 
  • Yves Combarnous
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Protein Disulfide Isomerase (PDI) in the endoplasmic reticulum of all cells catalyzes the rearrangement of disulfide bridges during folding of membrane and secreted proteins. As PDI is also known to bind various molecules including hormones such as estradiol and thyroxin, we considered the hypothesis that adverse effects of endocrine-disrupter compounds (EDC) could be mediated through their interaction with PDI leading to defects in membrane or secreted proteins.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Taking advantage of the recent description of the fluorescence self quenched substrate di-eosin-oxidized-glutathion (DiE-GSSG), we determined kinetically the effects of various potential pharmaceutical EDCs on the in-vitro reductase activity of bovine liver PDI by measuring the fluorescence of the reaction product (E-GSH). Our data show that estrogens (ethynylestradiol and bisphenol-A) as well as indomethacin exert an inhibition whereas medroxyprogesteroneacetate and nortestosterone exert a potentiation of bovine PDI reductase activity.

Conclusions

The present data indicate that the tested EDCs could not only affect endocrine target cells through nuclear receptors as previously shown, but could also affect these and all other cells by positively or negatively affecting PDI activity. The substrate DiE-GSSG has been demonstrated to be a convenient substrate to measure PDI reductase activity in the presence of various potential EDCs. It will certainely be usefull for the screening of potential effect of all kinds of chemicals on PDI reductase activity.

Introduction

Endocrine-disrupting compounds are commonly considered as molecules acting either by mimicking or by blocking the transcriptionnal activation of hormone nuclear receptors such as those for estrogens, androgens, progestagens, thyroid hormones etc [1], [2]. Nevertheless, other pathways are now taken into consideration because these hormones can affect nuclear receptors indirectly [3] or act through non-genomic pathways [4] or can bind to non-receptor cellular proteins [5].

In the frame of the european Food & Fecundity project (http://foodandfecundity.factlink.net/180095.1/), one of the main strategic objectives was to identify pharmaceutical products as potential endocrine disruptors of reproductive function and to determine their adverse effects and mechanisms of action in in-vitro and in-vivo systems. A prioritization list of seven pharmaceutical products bearing a potential of affecting human fecundity by entering the food chain has been created on the basis of production volume, recognized presence in environment and documented effect(s) on reproduction [6]. The main drug of concern in this respect was 17α-ethinylestradiol that is the estrogenic component of most contraceptive pills.

Besides, it has been reported that Protein Disulfide Isomerase which catalyzes oxidative folding of proteins [7] in the endoplasmic reticulum has also been found to be a high-capacity binding protein for 17β-estradiol [5]. It was also found by the same authors that 17β-estradiol displayed an inhibitory effect on isomerase activity of PDI using scrambled RNA as substrate [5]. Taking this information into account, we considered the hypothesis that EDCs could exert part of their effects by affecting PDI properties. We have thus undertaken a study of the influence of estrogens as well as other pharmaceuticals of interest on another enzymatic function of PDI, i.e. its disulfide reductase activity.

Results

Preliminary control experiments were carried out in order to check whether reduction of DiE-GSSG by another enzyme than PDI or its cleavage by various proteases or conformational changes could interfere in the assay (see figure S1 in supplementary data). We found that on a molar basis, thioredoxin exhibited less than 0.1% reductase activity on DiE-GSSG compared to PDI. Likewise, Glutathion Reductase either in the presence of 1 mM NADPH or 33 µM DTeT was unable to reduce DiE-GSSG. Several proteolytic enzymes (trypsin, thrombin, collagenase-dispase, leucine-aminopeptidase and carboxypeptidase) were tested and found to be without any effect on DiE-GSSG fluorescence. Moreover, neither 0.1% Tween nor 0.5 M concentrations of sodium chloride or ammonium sulfate had any direct effect on DiE-GSSG fluorescence. All these negative controls indicate that the reductase assay using DiE-GSSG as a substrate is highly specific for PDI (see supplementary material).

Figure 1A shows the kinetics of DiE-GSSG reduction catalyzed by bovine liver PDI. A dose-dependent inhibition of PDI by EE2 can be evidenced through the measurement of the initial rate of the reaction. Figure 1B shows that the kinetics of DiEGSSG reduction by PDI as followed by EGSH fluorescence is insensitive to the presence of ethanol up to 10% (v/v). In figure 1A, the maximum ethanol concentration (for EE2 1 µM) is less than 0.01%. The estrogens E2 and DES exhibited similar effects as EE2 as shown in figure 2. Indeed, figure 2 reports the effects of increasing concentrations of the various estrogenic EDCs under study (E2, EE2, DES) on the initial velocity of PDI activity using DiE-GSSG and DTeT as co-substrates. Interestingly, the three estrogenic molecules exhibit a significant inhibitory effect on PDI activity starting at concentrations as low as 10−8 M. BPA was also found to exert a partial (20%) inhibitory effect on PDI reductase activity but only at concentrations higher than10−4 M (not shown).

thumbnail
Figure 1. PDI-catalyzed reduction of di-eosin oxidized-glutathion (DiE-GSSG) in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of ethynylestradiol (EE2).

A/ Kinetics of PDI-catalyzed reduction of DiE-GSSG in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of ethynylestradiol (EE2). PDI activity is determined using initial velocity of the reaction as measured through the abolishment of fluorescence self quenching in 2.4 µM DiE-GSSG when it is reduced into two molecules of E-GSH in the presence of 33 µM DTeT. B/ Comparison of Kinetics of PDI-catalyzed reduction of DiE-GSSG as in A/ in the absence (○) or presence (•) of 10% (v/v) ethanol in the 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 8.0.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009507.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. Dose-dependent inhibition of PDI reductase activity by the estrogenic compounds E2 (○), DES (•) and EE2 (□).

PDI activities represent initial velocities determined by kinetics of DiE-GSSG reduction as described in fig. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009507.g002

Figure 3 shows the effects of three non-estrogenic potential EDCs, MPA, 19-NT and IMT, on PDI activity. Only IMT exhibits an inhibitory effect which is however much less important than that of estrogenic molecules (fig. 2). By contrast, the two non-estrogenic steroids MPA and 19-NT exhibit a potentiation effect on PDI reductase activity but only above 10−5 M for 19NT.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Dose-dependent effect of MPA (○), 19-NT (▴) and IMT(⋄) on PDI reductase activity.

PDI activities represent initial velocities determined by kinetics of DiE-GSSG reduction as described in fig. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009507.g003

In addition we checked that 10−4 M bacitracin that is a known inhibitor of PDI activity [8], [9] also exhibited such an inhibitory activity in this protocol (not shown).

Discussion

Protein Disulfide Isomerase (PDI) is a multifunctional enzyme mainly found in the endoplasmic reticulum of eukaryotes where its main function is to catalyze the rearrangement (isomerization) of disulfide bridges during folding of membrane and secreted proteins. Its concentration in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum is known to be very high [10] and it has been reported to act as a high capacity reservoir for various ligands including hormones such as estradiol (E2) and thyroxine (T3) [5], [11]. This ability of PDI to bind a large number of different molecules prompted us to search whether potential encocrine disruptor compounds (EDCs) could exert an influence on its reductase activity. For this matter, we used the recently described fluorescence self-quenched substrate DiE-GSSG [12] that is easier to synthesize and exhibits a much higher signal than the previously described substrate di-aminobenzoyl-GSSG [13].

Since eosin fluorescence in DiE-GSSG is quenched because of the vicinity of eosin-goups at the N-termini of oxidized glutathion (GSSG), it was important to check that reduction by another enzyme than PDI or proteolysis or conformational change of GSSG could not interfere in the assay. Thioredoxin exerted a very marginal DiE-GSSG reducing activity (0.1%) compared to PDI. This observation indicates that the b and b' domains of PDI [14] play an important role in addition to the thioredoxin-like a and a' domains to permit efficient reducing activity on DiE-GSSG. Glutathion Reductase was found to be devoid of activity whatever reducing co-substrate was used (1 mM NADPH or 33 µM DteT). None of the tested or proteases provoked any change in DiE-GSSG fluorescence. All these data indicate that DiE-GSSG is a highly specific substrate for the measurement of PDI reductase activity.

The most interesting observation was that the three estrogenic molecules that have been tested (E2, EE2 and DES) exerted an inhibitory effect on PDI reductase activity. This inhibition was observed with concentrations as low as 1–10 nM. These very low concentrations were unexpected as a Kd of 2.1 µM had been previously determined for the binding of E2 to rat PDI [5]. A possible origin of the observed discrepancy is that these authors studied recombinant rat PDI expressed in E. coli [[15], [16]] whereas bovine liver PDI was used in the present study. It can be suspected that the redox potential in endoplamic reticulum environment, less reductive than that in bacteria, is of utmost importance for the correct folding of PDI and consequently recombinant PDI expressed in E.coli might be unappropriate.

An inhibitory effect of micromolar concentrations of E2 on the isomerase activity of the recombinant rat PDI in the RNA refolding assay had been observed [5]. In the present work, we followed the reductase activity of bovine liver PDI instead of its isomerase activity. Therefore, it could also be that estrogens exert their effects on these two activities of PDIs at different concentrations. Nevertheless, in both cases estrogens have been shown to interact with PDI and to inhibit its activities. Numerous EDC affecting reproduction are estrogenic molecules such as EE2, DES, BP-A etc… [17][19]. The observation of diminished PDI reductase activity in the presence of physiological concentrations of estrogens indicates that these hormones might have an inhibitory effect on the synthesis and secretion of proteins including by cells not expressing estrogen receptors. It must also be taken into consideration that PDI can be found at the surface of plasma membrane where it is thought to exert various functions [20]. Circulating estrogens could thus be expected to play a role at this level.

The data in the present paper also show that non-estrogenic steroids such as the progestagen MPA and the androgen 19NT not only do not exhibit any inhibiting effect on PDI reductase activity but, in contrast, exert unexpected potentiation effects.

Previous papers have reported interaction of PDI with estrogenic molecules such as estradiol [5], [21][23] or bisphenol-A [24], [25]. It has also been shown to interact with other hormones such as T3 [11] and many other molecules. In the present report, we have focused on the in vitro effects of potential endocrine disrupters of reproduction on the reductase activity of PDI.

Endocrine disruptor compounds (EDC) are suspected to affect human and animal health with possible consequences for development and evolution. Indeed, they act either through hormone receptors, particularly nuclear receptors [26] or epigenetically through various mechanisms [4]. Considering the large amount of PDI in all cells as well as its crucial role in the correct folding of membrane and secreted proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, it is of concern that all the EDCs tested in present work exhibited negative (estrogens, indomethacin) or positive (progestagen, androgen) effects on its reductase activity. These data strongly suggest that EDCs could affect not only endocrine target cells through nuclear receptors but also all cells through PDI and consequently by affecting folding of proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Defective protein folding has been described as a basis for human disease [4], [27][29] and should thus be taken into consideration in the study of detrimental effects of EDCs.

Extrapolation of the present data to in vivo exposures is obviously difficult. Obviously, each individual potential EDC tested in the present study is not expected to reach a sufficient concentration in vivo to exert by itself a significant effect on PDI activity. Nevertheless, owing to the large number of molecules able to interact with PDI, additive or even synergistic effects can be envisionned and could lead to significant in vivo effects.

The availability of the new substrate PDI DiE-GSSG [12] offers a rapid and easy way to test all suspected molecules for their eventual effect on PDI activity. Since neither Thioredoxin nor Glutathion Reductase reduce DiE-GSSG in the presence of NADPH or DTeT, this substrate appears to be highly specific for PDI. This assay should thus be used as a screen to detect molecules that, individually or synergisticallly, would be potentially harmful for cell function by affecting protein folding.

Materials and Methods

17β-estradiol (E2), 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), diethylstilbestrol (DES), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 19-nor-testosterone (19NT), bacitracin, indomethacin (IMT), bisphenol A (BPA), dithioerythreitol (DTeT), eosin 5-isothiocyanate, oxidized glutathion (GSSG), Protein Disulfide Isomerase (E.C. 5.3.4.1) from bovine liver (PDI), Thioredoxin (E.C 1.6.4.5) from spirulina and Glutahtion Reductase (E.C 1.6.4.2) from S. cerevisiae as well as the proteolytic enzymes trypsin, thrombin, collagenase-dispase, leucine-aminopeptidase and carboxypeptidase were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Isle-d'Abeau, France) and were of the highest available grades. All steroids were initially disolved in ethanol and serially diluted in the 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 8.0 used for the kinetics.

The PDI substrate, di-eosin-oxidized glutathion (diE-GSSG), was synthesized and purified as previously described [12] with minor modifications. After final purification on sephadex G50 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) in water, aliquots of eluted DiE-GSSG were freeze-dried and kept in the dark until use.

PDI reductase activity was measured through abolishment of fluorescent self quenching when DiE-GSSG is reduced into two molecules of E-GSH. Initial velocities in fluorescence increase (λexc = 518 nm; λem = 545 nm) were recorded using a Spectra-Max Gemini spectrofluorimeter (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CAL USA) and analyzed with SoftMaxPro program. Concentrations of the reagents at t0 were 200–333 nM for PDI, 2.4 µM for DiE-GSSG, 33 µM for DTeT and 0.1 nM to 100 µM for the various molecules under study (E2, EE2, DES, MPA, 19NT and IMT).

Supporting Information

File S1.

Control experiments showing the effects of reductive enzymes and proteolytic enzymes on DiE-GSSG fluorescence (λexc = 518 nm; λem = 545 nm)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009507.s001

(0.19 MB DOC)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YC. Performed the experiments: DK MV YC. Analyzed the data: YC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CC YC. Wrote the paper: YC.

References

  1. 1. Kavlock RJ, Daston GP, DeRosa C, Fenner-Crisp P, Gray , et al. (1996) Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop. Environ Health Perspect 104: Suppl 4715–40.
  2. 2. Toppari J (2008) Environmental endocrine disrupters. Sex Dev 2: 260–7.
  3. 3. Tabb MM, Blumberg B (2006) New modes of action for endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Mol Endocrinol 20: 475–82.
  4. 4. Crews D, McLachlan JA (2006) Epigenetics, evolution, endocrine disruption, health, and disease. Endocrinology 147: S4–10.
  5. 5. Primm TP, Gilbert HF (2001) Hormone binding by protein disulfide isomerase, a high capacity hormone reservoir of the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 276: 281–6.
  6. 6. Piersma AH PV, Cagampang F, Luijten M, Tomenko V (2005) Prioritization list of pharmaceutical products (PPs) bearing a potential of affecting human fecundity. Food and Fecundity contract n° 2004-513953:
  7. 7. Gruber CW, Cemazar M, Heras B, Martin JL, Craik DJ (2006) Protein disulfide isomerase: the structure of oxidative folding. Trends Biochem Sci 31: 455–64.
  8. 8. Roth RA (1981) Bacitracin: an inhibitor of the insulin degrading activity of glutathione-insulin transhydrogenase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 98: 431–8.
  9. 9. Mandel R, Ryser HJ, Ghani F, Wu M, Peak D (1993) Inhibition of a reductive function of the plasma membrane by bacitracin and antibodies against protein disulfide-isomerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 4112–6.
  10. 10. Abell BA, Brown DT (1993) Sindbis virus membrane fusion is mediated by reduction of glycoprotein disulfide bridges at the cell surface. J Virol 67: 5496–501.
  11. 11. Guthapfel R, Gueguen P, Quemeneur E (1996) Reexamination of hormone-binding properties of protein disulfide-isomerase. Eur J Biochem 242: 315–9.
  12. 12. Raturi A, Mutus B (2007) Characterization of redox state and reductase activity of protein disulfide isomerase under different redox environments using a sensitive fluorescent assay. Free Radic Biol Med 43: 62–70.
  13. 13. Raturi A, Vacratsis PO, Seslija D, Lee L, Mutus B (2005) A direct, continuous, sensitive assay for protein disulphide-isomerase based on fluorescence self-quenching. Biochem J 391: 351–7.
  14. 14. Hatahet F, Ruddock LW (2007) Substrate recognition by the protein disulfide isomerases. FEBS J 274: 5223–34.
  15. 15. Gilbert HF, Kruzel ML, Lyles MM, Harper JW (1991) Expression and purification of recombinant rat protein disulfide isomerase from Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 2: 194–8.
  16. 16. Walker KW, Lyles MM, Gilbert HF (1996) Catalysis of oxidative protein folding by mutants of protein disulfide isomerase with a single active-site cysteine. Biochemistry 35: 1972–80.
  17. 17. Vosges M, Braguer JC, Combarnous Y (2008) Long-term exposure of male rats to low-dose ethinylestradiol (EE2) in drinking water: effects on ponderal growth and on litter size of their progeny. Reprod Toxicol 25: 161–8.
  18. 18. van Meeuwen JA, van den Berg M, Sanderson JT, Verhoef A, Piersma AH (2007) Estrogenic effects of mixtures of phyto- and synthetic chemicals on uterine growth of prepubertal rats. Toxicol Lett 170: 165–76.
  19. 19. Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, Rubin BS, Soto AM (2009) Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev 30: 75–95.
  20. 20. Pendurthi UR, Rao LV (2008) Role of tissue factor disulfides and lipid rafts in signaling. Thromb Res 122: Suppl 1S14–8.
  21. 21. Klappa P, Stromer T, Zimmermann R, Ruddock LW, Freedman RB (1998) A pancreas-specific glycosylated protein disulphide-isomerase binds to misfolded proteins and peptides with an interaction inhibited by oestrogens. Eur J Biochem 254: 63–9.
  22. 22. Fu XM, Zhu BT (2009) Human pancreas-specific protein disulfide isomerase homolog (PDIp) is an intracellular estrogen-binding protein that modulates estrogen levels and actions in target cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 115: 20–9.
  23. 23. Tsibris JC, Hunt LT, Ballejo G, Barker WC, Toney LJ, et al. (1989) Selective inhibition of protein disulfide isomerase by estrogens. J Biol Chem 264: 13967–70.
  24. 24. Hiroi T, Okada K, Imaoka S, Osada M, Funae Y (2006) Bisphenol A binds to protein disulfide isomerase and inhibits its enzymatic and hormone-binding activities. Endocrinology 147: 2773–80.
  25. 25. Hashimoto S, Okada K, Imaoka S (2008) Interaction between bisphenol derivatives and protein disulphide isomerase (PDI) and inhibition of PDI functions: requirement of chemical structure for binding to PDI. J Biochem 144: 335–42.
  26. 26. Jacobs MN (2004) In silico tools to aid risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Toxicology 205: 43–53.
  27. 27. Thomas PJ, Qu BH, Pedersen PL (1995) Defective protein folding as a basis of human disease. Trends Biochem Sci 20: 456–9.
  28. 28. Kim PS, Arvan P (1998) Endocrinopathies in the family of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) storage diseases: disorders of protein trafficking and the role of ER molecular chaperones. Endocr Rev 19: 173–202.
  29. 29. Dobson CM (1999) Protein misfolding, evolution and disease. Trends Biochem Sci 24: 329–32.