29 Jul 2010: Festa RA, McAllister F, Pearce MJ, Mintseris J, Burns KE, et al. (2010) Correction: Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein (Pup) Proteome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLOS ONE 5(7): 10.1371/annotation/bf95b2c0-4085-417b-a2b2-7a85ffe77a9e. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/bf95b2c0-4085-417b-a2b2-7a85ffe77a9e View correction
Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the first known post-translational small protein modifier in prokaryotes, and targets several proteins for degradation by a bacterial proteasome in a manner akin to ubiquitin (Ub) mediated proteolysis in eukaryotes. To determine the extent of pupylation in Mtb, we used tandem affinity purification to identify its “pupylome”. Mass spectrometry identified 55 out of 604 purified proteins with confirmed pupylation sites. Forty-four proteins, including those with and without identified pupylation sites, were tested as substrates of proteolysis in Mtb. Under steady state conditions, the majority of the test proteins did not accumulate in degradation mutants, suggesting not all targets of pupylation are necessarily substrates of the proteasome under steady state conditions. Four proteins implicated in Mtb pathogenesis, Icl (isocitrate lyase), Ino1 (inositol-1-phosphate synthase), MtrA (Mtb response regulator A) and PhoP (phosphate response regulator P), showed altered levels in degradation defective Mtb. Icl, Ino1 and MtrA accumulated in Mtb degradation mutants, suggesting these proteins are targeted to the proteasome. Unexpectedly, PhoP was present in wild type Mtb but undetectable in the degradation mutants. Taken together, these data demonstrate that pupylation regulates numerous proteins in Mtb and may not always lead to degradation.
Citation: Festa RA, McAllister F, Pearce MJ, Mintseris J, Burns KE, Gygi SP, et al. (2010) Prokayrotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein (Pup) Proteome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS ONE 5(1): e8589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008589
Editor: Anil Kumar Tyagi, University of Delhi, India
Received: November 17, 2009; Accepted: December 9, 2009; Published: January 6, 2010
Copyright: © 2010 Festa et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants GM67945, HG3456, and HG3616 awarded to S.P.G., and AI065437, HL092774 and a Center for AIDS Research Pilot Project grant (A1027742-17) awarded to K.H.D. M.J.P. received support from 5T32AI07189-25 and R.A.F. was the recipient of a Jan T. Vilcek Fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Most individuals who are infected with Mtb do not develop tuberculosis. However, despite effective control of Mtb growth in healthy individuals, Mtb is rarely sterilized from the body . Although numerous aspects of the immune system are responsible for slowing the growth of Mtb, the antimicrobial molecule nitric oxide (NO) appears to be essential for this process (reviewed in ). In a previous effort to identify new targets for tuberculosis therapy, Mtb mutants were screened for hyper-susceptibility to NO . This screen identified two previously uncharacterized proteins, Mycobacterium proteasomal ATPase (Mpa) and proteasome accessory factor A (PafA). Proteasome protease activity encoded by prcBA appears to be essential for optimal in vitro growth of Mtb , ,  but not the non-pathogenic relative M. smegmatis , .
Follow up studies revealed that PafA attaches a small protein, Pup, to at least three substrates to target them for degradation by the Mtb proteasome , . Pup binds to Mpa at a ratio of 1∶6 , , , , which is thought to lead to protein unfolding for delivery into the proteasome core protease, although the latter has not been definitively demonstrated. Importantly, pupylation and proteasome function are essential for the virulence of Mtb for reasons that remain a mystery, , .
Pupylation is currently the only known post-translational protein-to-protein modification system in prokaryotes. Pup attaches to substrate lysines (K, Lys) via isopeptide bonds in a manner reminiscent of ubiquitin (Ub) and ubiquitin-like modifier (Ubl) conjugation to proteins in eukaryotes (reviewed in ). Proteins targeted for proteasomal degradation in eukaryotes are usually tagged with polyubiquitin chains , , . Regulatory complexes associated with proteasomes recognize polyubiquitin chains, and remove and recycle Ub monomers for additional ubiquitylation reactions . We do not know if Pup forms chains, or if it is recycled like Ub. Importantly, the only common feature between Ub and Pup appears to be a di-glycine motif (GG, Gly-Gly) at or near their C-termini. Ub attaches to substrate Lys via a C-terminal Gly carboxylate. Unlike Ub, Pup attaches to substrate Lys by a carboxylate group at a C-terminal glutamine (Q, Gln); however this Gln is deamidated prior to ligation  by deamidase of Pup (Dop) . Thus the former Gln becomes a glutamate (Glu, E) and it is not known which carboxylate, the alpha or gamma, forms the isopeptide bond with substrate Lys (“GGE∼K”). Although the details of pupylation are unclear, PafA is sufficient to ligate deamidated Pup to substrates in vitro .
In a previous study, two-dimensional (2D) SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the proteomes of wild type and proteasome-defective Mtb nearly overlapped; only two proteins, FabD (malonyl CoA-acyl carrier protein acyltransferase) and PanB (3-methyl-2-oxobutanoate hydroxymethyltransferase), were conspicuously dependent on Mtb proteasome activity for turnover under routine culture conditions or in the presence of acidified nitrite, a source of NO . Both proteins were found to be pupylated . In addition, we previously determined that Mpa, the presumed proteasomal ATPase, is also a degradation substrate of the proteasome  and is pupylated . At the time, these results led us to hypothesize that either the Mtb proteasome had few substrates, or that other proteins were not as robustly turned over as FabD and PanB under these conditions.
With the discovery of Pup, we were better able to comprehensively identify putative proteasomal substrates by purifying proteins that were covalently attached to Pup in Mtb. Here, our goals were to determine (1) if there were targets of pupylation in addition to FabD, PanB and Mpa; (2) if Pup formed chains like Ub; and (3) if pupylated proteins were necessarily proteasome targets. Based on results presented here and elsewhere , , we have now found a total of 58 pupylation targets, revealing a much broader role for Pup in protein regulation than previously expected . In addition, no Pup chains were identified, suggesting poly-pupylation is not required for proteolysis or other physiological processes. Interestingly, several pupylation targets did not show increased steady state levels in degradation-defective mutants under the conditions tested. Finally, our study revealed clues that may suggest a link between proteasome-dependent proteolysis and Mtb pathogenesis.
Mass Spectrometry Identifies Numerous Pupylated Proteins in Mtb
We used a tandem affinity purification (TAP) approach to isolate proteins covalently associated with Pup in Mtb under routine culture conditions (see Materials and Methods). This technique has successfully identified Ub and Ub-related modifier conjugated substrates in eukaryotes (reviewed in , , ). Using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) we identified 604 proteins including Pup (Table S1), representing ∼15% of the total predicted proteome of Mtb strain H37Rv , . Due to the high sensitivity of MS/MS it is likely that numerous proteins are not genuine pupylation targets but co-purified with true pupylated substrates. We also predict that the pupylome changes depending on the culture conditions, thus we will refer to the proteins identified under routine culture conditions as the “RCC pupylome”.
The Pup site of attachment was identified for 55 proteins, including the previously characterized FabD (Tables 1, S2) . Two proteins had also been identified as pupylation targets in the non-pathogenic saprophyte M. smegmatis (Ino1, SodA); the same Lys in Ino1 was modified in both mycobacterial species  (Table 1). All linkages were GGE∼K as described for previously identified pupylation targets. There was no evidence of Pup∼Pup conjugates suggesting Pup does not form chains, however, it is possible that Pup∼Pup conjugates are present beyond the level detection, or form only under certain conditions.
Of the 55 proteins with identifiable pupylation sites, most appeared to only have one site of Lys modification. Three exceptions included FabG4 (probable 3-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein reductase) and Bcp (probable bacterioferritin co-migratory protein), each with two pupylation sites; and HspX (alpha crystallin homologue), which could have any of four of eight Lys pupylated (Table 1, S2). HspX was particularly striking as it is among the smallest proteins (16.3 kD) identified in our analysis. It was not clear if a single polypeptide could have different Lys occupied by Pup at the same time because peptides with possible pupylation sites were also found in unmodified form (Table S1).
The location of the modified Lys did not appear to favor a particular region (e.g. N- or C-termini) of the target proteins, and a conspicuous motif near the modified Lys was not identified. It is perhaps not surprising that a robust motif that indicates a favored Lys for pupylation was not found. With the exception of the eukaryotic small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) family of proteins (reviewed in ), conserved motifs surrounding modified residues have not been observed for Ub or other Ubls.
Pupylation Targets Include Proteins from Eight Functional Classifications
Genes in Mtb are assigned to one of 11 functional classifications, including stable RNAs, insertion sequences and phages . All proteins identified in the RCC pupylome fall into one of seven classifications (Table 2). Notably absent were “proteins of unknown function” and “PE (proline-glutamate) and PPE (proline-proline-glutamate) proteins”; PE/PPE genes are numerous in Mtb, are predicted to encode secreted proteins, but their role in Mtb biology is poorly understood . It is possible that the predicted extra-cytoplasmic membrane localization of PE/PPE proteins explains the lack of representation by this protein family in the RCC pupylome, which did not include culture supernatants or completely solubilized membranes.
Members of three classifications appeared to be over-represented in the RCC pupylome when compared to their representation in the entire genome. These included “intermediary metabolism”, “lipid metabolism”, and “detoxification/virulence” (Table 2). Detoxification/virulence proteins included the chaperonins GroES, GroEL1 and GroEL2; pupylation sites were identified for GroES and GroEL2 (Tables 1, S2). We previously reported that the proteasomal ATPase Mpa is itself a target of pupylation and proteasomal degradation , , and have now identified the pupylation site (Tables 1, S2). Interestingly, several other proteins associated with proteasome function (PafA and Dop) were also identified (Table S1) , , . However, we have not been able to confirm that these proteins are covalently modified with Pup.
“Cell wall processes and membrane proteins” were under-represented compared to the predicted proteome devoted to this classification. This is likely due to experimental bias and we presume much of the membrane and its components were lost during processing. Of the proteins in this class with confirmed pupylation sites, none was a predicted secreted or integral membrane protein.
Identification of Four New Candidate Proteasome Substrates
To determine if proteins identified by TAP/MS were likely proteasome degradation substrates, we cloned 41 genes listed in Table S1, including 18 of the 27 genes encoding transcriptional regulators. None of these genes was induced (or repressed) in mpa or pafA mutant Mtb as determined by microarray analysis (R.A.F., K.H.D, manuscript in preparation). Each was cloned downstream of a heterologous promoter and ribosome-binding site (RBS) with a His6 epitope encoded at the C-terminus (see Methods; Table S3). Plasmids were used to transform wild type, pafA and mpa null mutant strains of Mtb, and steady state levels of putative substrates were examined by detection of the His6-epitope by immunoblotting. Of the 41 constructs, eight plasmids (pSYMP-Rv0681, -phoY2, -hspX, -ino1, -leuD, -fadE24, -tsf, and -cmaA2) resulted in undetectable recombinant protein or very few transformants of all three Mtb test strains, although TAP/MS had previously shown that three of the test proteins (HspX, Ino1, Tsf) were pupylated in the RCC pupylome (Table 1). The inability to detect recombinant protein may suggest the test proteins are unstable or toxic when overproduced.
Recombinant Icl (isocitrate lyase) and MtrA (Mtb response regulator A) accumulated in the mpa and pafA mutants, suggesting they are targets for proteasomal degradation (Fig. 1A). Both proteins had identifiable pupylation sites (Table 1). Icl is involved in the glyoxylate shunt pathway, which allows Mtb to utilize fatty acids or acetate as a carbon source  and is required for persistent infection of mice , . MtrA is a response regulator that appears to be essential for Mtb growth in vitro as attempts to delete mtrA have been unsuccessful . Over-expression of mtrA in Mtb results in slowed growth in cultured macrophages and mice, but not in broth culture . The physiological relevance of artificial over-production of this transcriptional regulator remains to be determined. Although we found recombinant MtrA-His6 is more stable in proteasome-defective mutants, we do not know if endogenous MtrA accumulates in mpa or pafA mutants, or if pupylation affects MtrA activity.
(A) Immunoblots using antibodies to His5 show that recombinant Icl-His6 and MtrA-His6 accumulate in proteasome-defective Mtb strains. (B) Polyclonal rabbit antibodies raised against Ino1-His6 detect accumulated endogenous Ino1 in pafA and mpa mutants compared to wild type Mtb H37Rv. PhoP-His6 is undetectable in mpa and pafA mutants. (C) PhoP-His6 is undetectable in mpa and pafA mutants. (D) Region of 2D SDS-PAGE gels that shows a unique spot in mpa mutant soluble cell lysates that was identified by MALDI-TOF MS as PhoH2. (E) Polyclonal rabbit antibodies raised against PhoH2-His6 detect endogenous PhoH2 in pafA and mpa mutants but not wild type Mtb H37Rv (left). Antibodies to His5 detect PhoH2-His6 synthesized in the pafA and mpa mutants but not wild type Mtb transformed with pSYMP-phoH2-His6 (right). Lower panel is a longer exposure of the same blot. Dihydrolipoamide acyltransferase (DlaT) is the loading control for all panels. All data are representative of at least two independent experiments from biological replicates.
We were interested in determining if Ino1 was a proteasome substrate since it was identified in both M. smegmatis  and Mtb (Table 1) as a pupylated protein. Ino1 catalyzes the first committed step of inositol synthesis and is essential for the growth and virulence of Mtb . Because recombinant, over-produced Ino1-His6 was undetectable in Mtb we raised polyclonal antibodies to Mtb Ino1 to examine endogenous Ino1 levels. Like MtrA and Icl, Ino1 accumulated in the pafA and mpa mutant Mtb strains, and thus appears to be a proteasome substrate (Fig. 1B). The pupylated species, Pup∼Ino1, appears to accumulate in the mpa mutant (Fig. 1B, asterisk) similarly to Pup∼FabD .
In contrast to MtrA, the two-component response regulator PhoP was surprisingly less stable in the pafA and mpa mutants. In fact, PhoP-His6 was undetectable in the mutant strains (Fig. 1C). We speculate that PhoP interacts with another protein that is a pupylated proteasome substrate; this protein may function to target PhoP to another protease. Thus the accumulation of this hypothetical protein in a pafA or mpa mutant would reduce PhoP levels in these strains.
In addition to proteins identified by TAP/MS, we re-examined 2D-SDS-PAGE gels from a previous study  and identified a faint protein spot that was in lysates from an mpa mutant (Fig. 1D), but not wild type Mtb. This protein, PhoH2, was found in the RCC pupylome, is similar to PhoH from other organisms, and is predicted to bind ATP (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/TubercuList/). Although PhoH2 is annotated as a “phosphate starvation induced protein”, its actual function is unknown. Early attempts to ectopically express phoH2 in mycobacteria resulted in toxicity to mpa and pafA mutants under normal growth conditions therefore we raised polyclonal antibodies to PhoH2-His6 to examine endogenous protein. PhoH2 accumulated robustly in the pafA and mpa mutants (Fig. 1E, left) in a manner similar to FabD, PanB , and Ino1 (Fig. 1B). We eventually succeeded in ectopic expression of phoH2-His6 using the plasmid described for the other test substrates, and observed similar results with the recombinant protein (Fig. 1E, right).
Several Proteins Do Not Show Changes in Steady State Levels in Degradation Mutants under Standard Growth Conditions
Most of the recombinant proteins tested, including five shown to be pupylation substrates by TAP/MS (Table 1), demonstrated little to no change in steady state levels under the conditions tested (Fig. 2A, S1). Interestingly, over-exposure of immunoblots revealed what appears to be a pupylated form of Rv2859c, a possible amidotransferase (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/TubercuList/). The abundance of both the pupylated and unmodified form of Rv2859c are similar between wild type and mpa mutant Mtb (Fig. 2A, last panel), suggesting the pupylated form of this protein is not necessarily targeted for degradation under these conditions.
(A) Five pupylation substrates do not show increased steady state levels in proteasome-defective Mtb. Adk, FabG4, Mkl, DesA1 and Rv2859c were all epitope tagged with His6 at the C-termini. FabG4-His6 is predicted to have a MW of 48 kD, corresponding with the top band; a lower MW species appears in all strains tested, perhaps indicating proteolytic processing or an alternative translation initiation site after the predicted start codon. DlaT loading control is shown below each anti-His5 immunoblot (IB). (B) Purification of His6-tagged Adk, DesA1, Mkl, and FabG4 from wild type and mpa Mtb strains did not identify pupylated proteins. The upper band is the presumed full length FabG4 (without Pup). (C) IB analysis shows that endogenous ClpP1/2 and PknG do not accumulate in proteasome defective Mtb under routine culture conditions. Equivalent cell numbers from cultures grown to an optical density (ODA580) = 1.5 were analyzed. DlaT is the loading control for all samples.
Although the His6 epitope did not previously hinder the degradation of several test substrates  (Fig. 1), we cannot rule out that the His6 tag negatively affects the stability of certain proteins in Mtb. Additionally, over-production of certain substrates may overwhelm the proteasome system, masking any differences in protein stability. Because we were unable to detect differences in the steady state stability of Adk (probable adenylate kinase), FabG4 (3-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein reductase), Mkl (possible ribonucleotide-transport ATP-binding protein), or DesA1 (stearoyl-ACP destaturase) in total cell lysates, we purified the epitope-tagged proteins using affinity chromatography from wild type and mpa mutant Mtb to determine what proportion of these proteins was pupylated. Although we were able to purify the recombinant proteins from Mtb (Fig. 2B), we were unable to detect pupylated species of these proteins (not shown) despite MS data showing they are indeed targets of pupylation (Table 1). This suggests that these proteins are pupylated at extremely low levels or that the epitope tag on each prohibits efficient pupylation.
We also used available antibodies to examine the endogenous levels of two proteins identified in the pupylome, ClpP (caseinolytic protease) and PknG (protein kinase G). Neither protein was found to have a confirmed pupylated site therefore it was not clear if these were actual targets of pupylation. However, we chose to examine the endogenous levels of these proteins because both are predicted to be essential either for Mtb viability or pathogenesis , . Mtb encodes two ClpP orthologues, ClpP1 and ClpP2, which appear to be encoded in an operon. TAP/MS identified both ClpP1 and ClpP2 (Table S1). ClpP proteases are similar to proteasomes in that they form chambers and require ATP for regulated proteolysis (reviewed in ). Unlike proteasomes, which are only found in bacteria of the class Actinomycetes, ClpP proteases are found in all bacteria sequenced to date. Polyclonal antibodies to ClpP1/2 detected a single band in Mtb lysates (Fig. 2C, left). ClpP1 and ClpP2 are similar in molecular weight (22 and 24 kD, respectively) therefore we could not determine which of the two proteins, if not both, was detected. Nonetheless, we did not observe a difference in the steady state levels of this protein among the wild type and mutant Mtb strains. We also examined the steady state levels of PknG in wild type and proteasome defective Mtb strains. PknG is a serine-threonine kinase that is required for Mtb survival in cultured macrophages . Similar to ClpP1/2, we did not detect a difference in steady state PknG levels among the Mtb strains (Fig. 2C, right).
Enzymes of the Fatty Acid Synthase II (FASII) Pathway Are Differentially Regulated by the Pup-Proteasome System
Every protein encoded in the fatty acid synthase II (FASII) elongation cycle operon (FabD, AcpM, KasA, KasB, AccD6) was identified in the pupylome (Table S1), suggesting that nearly all proteins in this pathway are targets of pupylation, or that unpupylated FASII enzymes co-purified with pupylated proteins. As discussed earlier, FabG4, which is part of the FASII pathway but genetically unlinked, was shown to be pupylated on either of two Lys (Table 1), but not a proteasome substrate under normal culture conditions (Fig. 2A). FabD is encoded by the first gene in the FASII operon and is a robust degradation substrate , . Unlike FabD, KasA and KasB (beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthases 1 and 2, respectively) steady state levels were not noticeably different between the wild type and mpa and pafA strains (Fig. 3A, S1). We purified KasA-His6 and KasB-His6 from M. smegmatis for anti-Pup immunoblot analysis and observed a specific Pup-reactive protein in the KasB pull down (Fig. 3B), but not in the KasA sample (not shown). We then determined if Pup∼KasB was present in Mtb. As a positive control for the pull down of pupylated substrate, we purified Rv2859c-His6, which has a known pupylation site and for which a pupylated species could be detected in total cell lysates (Fig. 2A). As expected, we detected Pup∼Rv2859c in the wild type and mpa Mtb strains, but not in the pafA (pupylation-deficient) mutant (Fig. 3C). To our surprise, although Pup∼KasB was present in wild type Mtb, it was not detected in either the pafA or the mpa mutant (Fig. 3C). This suggested that a defect in Mpa function and/or proteolysis by the proteasome results in either abrogated pupylation, or possibly increased “de-pupylation” of KasB. Taken together, it appears that the Pup-proteasome pathway differentially affects enzymes of the FASII pathway.
(A) Anti-His5 immunoblot of FASII pathway enzymes that are confirmed or putative pupylation targets have differing steady state levels in proteasome-defective Mtb. The same KasA and KasB samples are also shown with the loading controls in Fig. S1. KasA (MW = 43 kD) migrates more slowly than KasB (MW 46 kD); similar observations were previously reported . The membrane was stripped and endogenous FabD was examined with FabD antibodies. (B) KasB-His6 is positive for pupylation. Pup antibodies show a specific Pup-reactive protein (*) from KasB-His6 purified from M. smegmatis. The protein above the indicated band (*) is non-specific and recognized in all samples from M. smegmatis. All data are representative of at least two independent experiments from biological replicates. (C) Pup∼KasB (*) is undetectable in the pafA and mpa mutants. His6-tagged Rv2859c and KasB were purified from Mtb and analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies to Pup, stripped, and then re-examined with antibodies to His5. Due to the unexpected result for the mpa mutant, we confirmed that the mpa strain was pupylation proficient by anti-Pup immunoblotting (not shown). The higher MW species appears to specifically co-purify with Pup∼KasB and is recognized by the Pup antibody. Equivalent cell numbers were analyzed and all experiments are representative of two replicates.
In this study we identified the pupylation sites of 55 proteins in Mtb, including the previously identified FabD and Mpa . Using the same pull-down techniques for identifying Pup∼FabD and Pup∼PanB , we determined that KasB is also pupylated (Fig. 3). We presume the degradation substrate PhoH2 is also pupylated, bringing our current pupylome total to 58 proteins. Three proteins have more than one pupylation site, but we did not identify Pup chains. To date, we have identified seven likely proteasome substrates, including FabD, PanB, Mpa ; and the newly identified PhoH2, Icl, MtrA, and Ino1.
Five of proteins with confirmed pupylation sites were not differentially turned over between wild type and proteasome-defective Mtb (Fig. 2). It is notable that three of the six known degradation substrates, FabD, PanB and PhoH2, were identified by comparing the steady state proteomes of wild type and degradation defective Mtb by 2D-SDS-PAGE; the two proteomes appeared nearly identical . These data are also consistent with the observation that numerous anti-Pup reactive proteins are present in Mtb, and the abundance of most of these proteins does not change in a degradation mutant . However, the lack of accumulation of pupylated substrates in a degradation-defective strain might be due to negative feedback regulation, where a defect in proteolysis results in reduced pupylation.
There are several possible explanations for why recombinant pupylation targets are not proteasome substrates. First, the reasons may be technical; it is possible that over-production of certain proteins overwhelms the Pup-proteasome system, masking any observable differences in proteolysis of these substrates. It is also possible that the His6-epitope prevents pupylation or degradation of certain proteins. Additionally, not all proteins may be pupylated to the same degree; for all of the test substrates, we do not know what percentage of each protein is pupylated. We also predict that certain proteins are differentially pupylated (and degraded) under specific conditions. Other proteins may be required to deliver a pupylated substrate to the proteasome, and these co-factors may not be expressed under the conditions tested. Finally, not all pupylated proteins may be targets of proteasomal degradation, a potentially exciting observation. Ub and related modifiers have numerous activities in eukaryotes , controlling processes from signal transduction to regulating enzyme activity, in addition to targeting proteins for degradation, therefore, we speculate that Pup has widespread, degradation-independent importance in bacterial physiology. How and why certain proteins are more efficiently targeted for pupylation and/or proteolysis are questions currently under investigation.
It is striking that the steady state level of one protein, FabD, is strongly regulated by pupylation while other confirmed (KasB, FabG4) and presumed (KasA) pupylated proteins in the same pathway are not rapidly turned over under the same conditions. Perhaps most intriguing is the observation that not only does Pup∼KasB not accumulate in an mpa mutant, but Pup∼KasB appears to be present at extremely low to undetectable levels in this strain (Fig. 3C). We do not yet understand the significance of this result, but we speculate that the absence of Mpa either reduces the pupylation of KasB, or increases the removal of Pup. It is also possible that Mpa protects Pup∼KasB from proteolysis by another protease.
Because proteasome function is essential for Mtb pathogenesis , , , ,  we predicted the identification of proteasomal degradation substrates may give clues to link proteasome-dependent proteolysis and virulence. The inability to turn over potentially hundreds (or even a handful) of proteins could greatly compromise bacterial survival when adapting to a new environment, such as the inside of an activated macrophage. It is unknown what effect, if any, the accumulation of metabolic enzymes, such as FabD, PanB, Ino1, Icl or PhoH2, has during an infection. Our data show that several virulence-associated proteins are regulated by proteasomal degradation. The transcriptional response regulator MtrA is pupylated and appears to be a proteasome substrate. Over-expression of MtrA attenuates Mtb in macrophages and mice  thus the accumulation of MtrA in a proteasome mutant could potentially contribute to the weakened virulence of proteasome-defective Mtb. In contrast to MtrA, the global regulator PhoP was less stable in the pafA and mpa mutants. PhoP is essential for the virulence of numerous pathogens, including Mtb , , , , . PhoP is required for Mtb growth in both macrophages and mice , . A point mutation in the DNA binding domain of PhoP in the avirulent Mtb strain H37Ra is thought to account for part of its attenuation compared to the virulent parent strain H37Rv , . The cause of attenuation of a phoP Mtb mutant is unclear, although PhoP appears to impact numerous aspects of Mtb biology, including lipid metabolism , , , early and enduring hypoxic responses , respiration, and virulence gene expression , . The lack of PhoP in the pafA and mpa mutants thus suggests an important role for proteasome activity on Mtb pathogenesis. A long-term goal will be to determine why PhoP stability is decreased in proteasome-defective Mtb.
Although our study has shed light on several aspects of the Pup-proteasome system, numerous additional questions have been raised. For example, how does a single ligase, PafA, target at least 58 or potentially hundreds of proteins for pupylation in Mtb? In eukaryotes, Ub ligases are numerous in order to provide specificity to ubiquitylation; how is specificity imparted in the Pup system? What signals in addition to Pup are required to target proteins for proteolysis? Does Pup play non-degradative roles in the cell? There is little doubt that considerable effort will be needed to determine how so many processes targeted by pupylation impact the physiology of Mtb.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, Media
All strains, primers and plasmids are listed in Table S3. For cloning and transformations we used E. coli DH5α (Gibco, BRL). For protein synthesis we used E. coli ER2566 . All Mtb work was performed in a Biosafety Level 3 (BSL3) suite. Mtb H37Rv was used for all Mtb studies. mpa and pafA mutants are described elsewhere . E. coli strains were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) Broth (Difco). Mtb strains were grown on 7H11 Middlebrook agar supplemented with oleic acid, dextrose and catalase (Middlebrook OADC, Difco) or in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) supplemented with 0.2% glycerol, 0.05% Tween-80, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.2% dextrose and 0.085% sodium chloride. Mtb cultures were grown without shaking in 75 cm2 vented flasks in humidified incubators with or without 5% CO2. For Mtb, kanamycin and hygromycin were used as needed at 50 µg/ml each. For E. coli, kanamycin and hygromycin were used at 100 and 150 µg/ml, respectively. Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was used at a final concentration of 1 mM.
For the identification of pupylated targets in Mtb, a tandem affinity tagged version of Pup (pMN-His6-Strep-Pup), was constructed. Mtb phoH2, ino1, and fabD were cloned into pET24b(+) for the purification of His6-FabD, Ino1-His6, and PhoH2-His6 for antibody production (see Table S3 for primers used for cloning).
For over-production of putative pupylation targets in Mtb we used a modified form of pMN402, which has green fluorescent protein (gfp) encoded downstream of a mycobacterial heat shock protein promoter (hsp60p) and a consensus bacterial RBS . Transformation of pMN402-derivatives that had gfp replaced with genes of interest often resulted in toxicity to Mtb, most likely due to strong over-expression of the cloned gene from the hsp60p and robust translation from the consensus RBS. To reduce protein synthesis by this plasmid, a short coding sequence ending with a consensus RBS and a start codon was cloned downstream of the gfp RBS and start codon. Genes of interest were cloned starting with the second start codon. We predicted the final plasmid expressed a transcript encoding a short peptide followed by the test substrate (all final constructs were designated “pSYMP”). As a result few of the test substrates were toxic to Mtb. Genes were amplified with primers that encoded a His6 epitope at the 3′ termini.
All primers were from Invitrogen. All plasmids were sequenced by GENEWIZ (South Plainfield, NJ) to confirm the veracity of the cloned sequences. Transformation was carried out using standard techniques for E. coli . Wild type, pafA and mpa mutant strains of Mtb were transformed with test plasmids using electroporation . Mtb transformants arose after 2–3 weeks and three colonies from each transformation were picked into 200 µl 7H9 broth with antibiotics in 96 well plates. After one week at 37°C, these starter cultures were inoculated into 5 ml 7H9 in vented 25 cm2 flasks (Corning), in duplicate, for further growth. After another week cultures were frozen or used for immunoblot analysis.
Purification of the RCC Pupylated Substrates
0.5 l WT Mtb containing pMN-His6-Strep-Pup was grown to an OD580 of ∼1.0. Bacteria were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in 14 ml of denaturing lysis buffer B (The QiaExpressionist manual, Qiagen) and 1 ml aliquots of cells were transferred to bead beating tubes each with 250 µl of zirconia silica beads (BioSpec Products). Cells were lysed by bead beating in a BioSpec Mini Bead Beater. Samples were clarified by centrifugation and were then passed through a 0.2 µ filter. The lysate was incubated with 1.5 ml of Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) for 2 h at 4°C with agitation. The agarose was collected in a polypropylene column and washed with denaturing wash buffer. The matrix was then washed with 1 column volume plus 10 ml of native wash buffer. Proteins were eluted with 3.5 ml native elution buffer. The eluate was incubated with 1 ml of Strep-Tactin Superflow (Qiagen) for 2 h at 4°C with agitation. The column was washed three times with 5 ml of Strep wash buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4/300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) and proteins were eluted in six 500 µl fractions with Strep elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4/300 mM NaCl/2.5 mM desthiobiotin, pH 8.0). 40 µl of elution two was visualized on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel stained with Biosafe Coomassie Blue (Bio-Rad). The entire lane was excised for tandem MS/MS analysis.
For identification of proteins pulled down by TAP we used in-gel proteolysis and LC-MS/MS analysis. The gel lane was divided into six bands, each of which was cut into ∼1 mm cubes and transferred into 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. The procedure for in-gel digestion was as described previously . Briefly, the proteins were digested overnight with trypsin at 37°C in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Peptides were extracted with 50% acetonitrile, 5% formic acid, dried by vacuum centrifugation and desalted using handmade StageTips containing C18 resin . Peptides were eluted with 50% acetonitrile, 5% formic acid into glass inserts, and dried in a Speed-Vac.
The samples were analyzed on an LTQ Orbitrap XL hybrid mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher) coupled to an Agilent 1100 series binary pump. Dried peptides were reconstituted in 8 µl 5% acetonitrile, 5% formic acid of which 4 µl was loaded onto a hand-pulled fused silica microcapillary (125 µm×15 cm, packed with Magic C18AQ, Michrom Bioresources) using a Famos autosampler (LC Packings). Loaded peptides were separated across a 45 m linear gradient of 10–37% solvent B (0.125% formic acid, 99.875% acetonitrile). Solvent A comprised 0.125% formic acid, 3% acetonitrile. Data were collected in a data-dependent mode using the TOP10 strategy where one full high resolution MS scan was acquired in the orbitrap followed by 10 MS/MS scans in the linear ion trap from the top 10 most intense ions.
RAW files were converted to mzXML files using the program ReAdW (http://sashimi.sourceforge.net/software_glossolalia.html). MS/MS spectra were searched using the SEQUEST search algorithm (version 27, revision 12) against an Mtb protein database  using a mass tolerance of 50 ppm and a static modification of 57.02146 Da (carboxyamidomethylation). The search parameters for post-translational modifications comprised dynamic modifications of 243.085522 Da on Lys (GGE) and 15.99491 Da on methionine (oxidation). Partial Trypsin was specified with a maximum of two missed cleavages.
Protein hits were filtered at the peptide level to contain less than 0.22% false positives, estimated by the number of decoy hits using in-house software and filtering based on dCn, XCorr, ppm, charge state and peptides per protein. The protein false positive rate was estimated to be 1.47%.
PhoH2 was identified by the Columbia Proteomics Core Facility from spots found in 2D gels prepared by kendricklabs.com .
Protein Purification and Immunoblot Analysis
FabD-His6 and Ino1-His6 were purified under native conditions; PhoH2-His6 was purified under denaturing conditions as described elsewhere (The QiaExpressionist). PhoH2-His6 was excised from a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Antibodies to PhoH2 and FabD were made by Sigma-Genosys; antibodies to Ino1 were made by Covance. All rabbit antibodies were diluted in 1% skim milk in TBST (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4/125 mM NaCl/0.05% Tween 20). Secondary antibodies (GE-Healthcare) were diluted in 1% milk/TBST. To examine epitope tagged protein levels each strain was grown under standard conditions until stationary phase (optical density at A580 between 1–2; all samples were OD matched). All cultures were processed exactly as described elsewhere . For immunoblot analysis, cell lysates were separated by 10 or 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and blocked in 3% bovine serum albumin/TBST and incubated with monoclonal Penta-His (His5) antibodies (Qiagen) or secondary antibodies (GE-Healthcare) in 1% milk/TBST.
To test is specific proteins were pupylated in mycobacteria, the gene encoding the protein of interest was expressed from pSYMP in M. smegmatis or Mtb. M. smegmatis was grown in 250 ml 7H9 and processed as described in the QiaExpressionist manual for purification under denaturing conditions. For Mtb, equivalent cell numbers based on A580 readings (typically 17 optical density units) were collected by centrifugation, washed with PBS/0.05% Tween-80, and resuspended in 3 ml native lysis buffer (QiaExpressionist). Bacteria were lysed by bead beating and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation. The supernatants were then filtered through a 0.22 µ nylon filter and incubated with 30 µl NiNTA agarose for 2 h at 4°C on a rotator. The agarose was washed four times with native wash buffer then eluted in 60 µl native elution buffer. 20 µl 4 5 protein sample buffer was added to eluates and samples were analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies to His5.
Steady state levels of many RCC pupylome proteins do not differ between wild type, pafA and mpa mutants. Immunoblots of equivalent cell numbers from cultures grown to an optical density (ODA580) = 1.5 were analyzed. All blots were stripped with 0.2 N sodium hydroxide and incubated with antibodies to DlaT, the loading control (lower panel for each blot).
(1.44 MB PDF)
Peptide profile of the pupylome.
(1.33 MB XLS)
Mtb peptides with pupylation sites.
(0.07 MB DOC)
We are grateful to A. Darwin for critical review of this manuscript. We thank E. Rubin for helpful conversations; R. Bryk and C. Nathan, A. Goldberg, and J. Pieters for generous gifts of polyclonal antibodies to DlaT, ClpP1/2, and PknG, respectively.
Conceived and designed the experiments: RAF FM MJP JM SPG KHD. Performed the experiments: RAF FM MJP KEB KHD. Analyzed the data: RAF FM MJP JM SPG KHD. Wrote the paper: RAF FM MJP KHD.
- 1. Hernandez-Pando R, Jeyanathan M, Mengistu G, Aguilar D, Orozco H, et al. (2000) Persistence of DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in superficially normal lung tissue during latent infection. Lancet 356: 2133–2138.
- 2. Nathan C, Ehrt S (2003) Nitric Oxide and Tuberculosis. In: Rom W, Garay S, editors. In Tuberculosis, second edition. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, N. Y.
- 3. Darwin KH, Ehrt S, Weich N, Gutierrez-Ramos J-C, Nathan CF (2003) The proteasome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required for resistance to nitric oxide. Science 302: 1963–1966.
- 4. Gandotra S, Schnappinger D, Monteleone M, Hillen W, Ehrt S (2007) In vivo gene silencing identifies the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome as essential for the bacteria to persist in mice. Nat Med 13: 1515–1520.
- 5. Darwin KH, Ehrt S, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Weich N, Nathan CF (2003) The proteasome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required for resistance to nitric oxide. Science 302: 1963–1966.
- 6. Sassetti CM, Boyd DH, Rubin EJ (2003) Genes required for mycobacterial growth defined by high density mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol 48: 77–84.
- 7. Burns KE, Liu WT, Boshoff HI, Dorrestein PC, Barry CE 3rd (2009) Proteasomal protein degradation in Mycobacteria is dependent upon a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein. J Biol Chem 284: 3069–3075.
- 8. Knipfer N, Shrader TE (1997) Inactivation of the 20S proteasome in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol Microbiol 25: 375–383.
- 9. Pearce MJ, Mintseris J, Ferreyra J, Gygi SP, Darwin KH (2008) Ubiquitin-like protein involved in the proteasome pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 322: 1104–1107.
- 10. Striebel F, Imkamp F, Sutter M, Steiner M, Mamedov A, et al. (2009) Bacterial ubiquitin-like modifier Pup is deamidated and conjugated to substrates by distinct but homologous enzymes. Nat Struct Mol Biol.
- 11. Sutter M, Striebel F, Damberger FF, Allain FH, Weber-Ban E (2009) A distinct structural region of the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) is recognized by the N-terminal domain of the proteasomal ATPase Mpa. FEBS Lett 583: 3151–3157.
- 12. Chen X, Solomon WC, Kang Y, Cerda-Maira F, Darwin KH, et al. (2009) Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein pup is intrinsically disordered. J Mol Biol 392: 208–217.
- 13. Liao S, Shang Q, Zhang X, Zhang J, Xu C, et al. (2009) Pup, a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein, is an intrinsically disordered protein. Biochem J in press.
- 14. Lamichhane G, Raghunand TR, Morrison NE, Woolwine SC, Tyagi S, et al. (2006) Deletion of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasomal ATPase homologue gene produces a slow-growing strain that persists in host tissues. J Infect Dis 194: 1233–1240.
- 15. Darwin KH (2009) Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein, Proteasomes, and Pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 485–491.
- 16. Chau V, Tobias JW, Bachmair A, Marriott D, Ecker DJ, et al. (1989) A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein. Science 243: 1576–1583.
- 17. Hershko A, Ciechanover A (1998) The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 67: 425–479.
- 18. Hough R, Rechsteiner M (1986) Ubiquitin-lysozyme conjugates. Purification and susceptibility to proteolysis. J Biol Chem 261: 2391–2399.
- 19. Hershko A, Rose IA (1987) Ubiquitin-aldehyde: a general inhibitor of ubiquitin-recycling processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84: 1829–1833.
- 20. Pearce MJ, Arora P, Festa RA, Butler-Wu SM, Gokhale RS, et al. (2006) Identification of substrates of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome. EMBO J 25: 5423–5432.
- 21. Denison C, Kirkpatrick DS, Gygi SP (2005) Proteomic insights into ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Curr Opin Chem Biol 9: 69–75.
- 22. Kirkpatrick DS, Denison C, Gygi SP (2005) Weighing in on ubiquitin: the expanding role of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Cell Biol 7: 750–757.
- 23. Rosas-Acosta G, Russell WK, Deyrieux A, Russell DH, Wilson VG (2005) A universal strategy for proteomic studies of SUMO and other ubiquitin-like modifiers. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 56–72.
- 24. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, et al. (1998) Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393: 537–544.
- 25. Camus JC, Pryor MJ, Medigue C, Cole ST (2002) Re-annotation of the genome sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Microbiology 148: 2967–2973.
- 26. Johnson ES (2004) Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 355–382.
- 27. Gey van Pittius NC, Sampson SL, Lee H, Kim Y, van Helden PD, et al. (2006) Evolution and expansion of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE and PPE multigene families and their association with the duplication of the ESAT-6 (esx) gene cluster regions. BMC Evol Biol 6: 95.
- 28. Festa RA, Pearce MJ, Darwin KH (2007) Characterization of the proteasome accessory factor (paf) operon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 189: 3044–3050.
- 29. Honer Zu Bentrup K, Miczak A, Swenson DL, Russell DG (1999) Characterization of activity and expression of isocitrate lyase in Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 181: 7161–7167.
- 30. McKinney JD, Honer zu Bentrup K, Munoz-Elias EJ, Miczak A, Chen B, et al. (2000) Persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages and mice requires the glyoxylate shunt enzyme isocitrate lyase. Nature 406: 735–738.
- 31. Munoz-Elias EJ, McKinney JD (2005) Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate lyases 1 and 2 are jointly required for in vivo growth and virulence. Nat Med 11: 638–644.
- 32. Zahrt TC, Deretic V (2000) An essential two-component signal transduction system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 182: 3832–3838.
- 33. Fol M, Chauhan A, Nair NK, Maloney E, Moomey M, et al. (2006) Modulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis proliferation by MtrA, an essential two-component response regulator. Mol Microbiol 60: 643–657.
- 34. Movahedzadeh F, Smith DA, Norman RA, Dinadayala P, Murray-Rust J, et al. (2004) The Mycobacterium tuberculosis ino1 gene is essential for growth and virulence. Mol Microbiol 51: 1003–1014.
- 35. Walburger A, Koul A, Ferrari G, Nguyen L, Prescianotto-Baschong C, et al. (2004) Protein kinase G from pathogenic mycobacteria promotes survival within macrophages. Science 304: 1800–1804.
- 36. Yu AY, Houry WA (2007) ClpP: a distinctive family of cylindrical energy-dependent serine proteases. FEBS Lett 581: 3749–3757.
- 37. Hochstrasser M (2009) Origin and function of ubiquitin-like proteins. Nature 458: 422–429.
- 38. Darwin KH, Lin G, Chen Z, Li H, Nathan CF (2005) Characterization of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasomal ATPase homologue. Mol Microbiol 55: 561–571.
- 39. Walters SB, Dubnau E, Kolesnikova I, Laval F, Daffe M, et al. (2006) The Mycobacterium tuberculosis PhoPR two-component system regulates genes essential for virulence and complex lipid biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol 60: 312–330.
- 40. Martin C, Williams A, Hernandez-Pando R, Cardona PJ, Gormley E, et al. (2006) The live Mycobacterium tuberculosis phoP mutant strain is more attenuated than BCG and confers protective immunity against tuberculosis in mice and guinea pigs. Vaccine 24: 3408–3419.
- 41. Gonzalo Asensio J, Maia C, Ferrer NL, Barilone N, Laval F, et al. (2006) The virulence-associated two-component PhoP-PhoR system controls the biosynthesis of polyketide-derived lipids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 281: 1313–1316.
- 42. Perez E, Samper S, Bordas Y, Guilhot C, Gicquel B, et al. (2001) An essential role for phoP in Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. Mol Microbiol 41: 179–187.
- 43. Groisman EA (1997) A green light for virulence gene expression. Nat Med 3: 1190–1191.
- 44. Chesne-Seck ML, Barilone N, Boudou F, Gonzalo Asensio J, Kolattukudy PE, et al. (2008) A point mutation in the two-component regulator PhoP-PhoR accounts for the absence of polyketide-derived acyltrehaloses but not that of phthiocerol dimycocerosates in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra. J Bacteriol 190: 1329–1334.
- 45. Lee JS, Krause R, Schreiber J, Mollenkopf HJ, Kowall J, et al. (2008) Mutation in the transcriptional regulator PhoP contributes to avirulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra strain. Cell Host Microbe 3: 97–103.
- 46. Gonzalo-Asensio J, Soto CY, Arbues A, Sancho J, del Carmen Menendez M, et al. (2008) The Mycobacterium tuberculosis phoPR operon is positively autoregulated in the virulent strain H37Rv. J Bacteriol 190: 7068–7078.
- 47. Frigui W, Bottai D, Majlessi L, Monot M, Josselin E, et al. (2008) Control of M. tuberculosis ESAT-6 secretion and specific T cell recognition by PhoP. PLoS Pathog 4: e33.
- 48. Chong S, Garcia GA (1994) A versatile and general prokaryotic expression vector, pLACT7. Biotechniques 17: 686, 688, 690–681.
- 49. Scholz O, Thiel A, Hillen W, Niederweis M (2000) Quantitative analysis of gene expression with an improved green fluorescent protein. p6. Eur J Biochem 267: 1565–1570.
- 50. Sambrook J, Maniatis T, Fritsch E (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
- 51. Hatfull GF, Jacobs WR J (2000) Molecular Genetics of Mycobacteria. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
- 52. Li X, Gerber SA, Rudner AD, Beausoleil SA, Haas W, et al. (2007) Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of alpha-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 6: 1190–1197.
- 53. Rappsilber J, Ishihama Y, Mann M (2003) Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Anal Chem 75: 663–670.
- 54. Schaeffer ML, Agnihotri G, Volker C, Kallender H, Brennan PJ, et al. (2001) Purification and biochemical characterization of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis beta-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthases KasA and KasB. J Biol Chem 276: 47029–47037.