Motility provides specific adhesion patterns and improves Listeria monocytogenes invasion into human HEp-2 cells

Listeria monocytogenes is motile at 22°C and non-motile at 37°C. In contrast, expression of L. monocytogenes virulence factors is low at 22°C and up-regulated at 37°C. Here, we studied a character of L. monocytogenes near surface swimming (NSS) motility and its effects on adhesion patterns and invasion into epithelial cells. L. monocytogenes and its saprophytic counterpart L. innocua both grown at 22°C showed similar NSS characteristics including individual velocities, trajectory lengths, residence times, and an asymmetric distribution of velocity directions. Similar NSS patterns correlated with similar adhesion patterns. Motile bacteria, including both pathogenic and saprophytic species, showed a preference for adhering to the periphery of epithelial HEp-2 cells. In contrast, non-motile bacteria were evenly distributed across the cell surface, including areas over the nucleus. However, the uneven distribution of motile bacteria did not enhance the invasion into HEp-2 cells unless virulence factor production was up-regulated by the transient shift of the culture to 37°C. Motile L. monocytogenes grown overnight at 22°C and then shifted to 37°C for 2 h expressed invasion factors at the same level and invaded human cells up to five times more efficiently comparatively with non-motile bacteria grown overnight at 37°C. Taken together, obtained results demonstrated that (i) NSS motility and correspondent peripheral location over the cell surface did not depend on L. monocytogenes virulence traits; (ii) motility improved L. monocytogenes invasion into human HEp-2 cells within a few hours after the transition from the ambient temperature to the human body temperature.


Introduction
Motility is a huge advantage for bacterial pathogens as it provides the ability to get favorable environments and cognitive targets [1][2][3].Flagellar motility is essential for virulence of many pathogenic bacteria and particularly enteric pathogens including Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Clostridium difficile, Helicobacter pylori, Campylobacter jejuni, and Listeria monocytogenes [4][5][6][7][8].Some enteric pathogens such as H. pylori need flagellar motility continuously during infection and cannot persist within the mammalian host without being motile and competent for chemotaxis [1,8] Others such as L. monocytogenes and enteropathogenic Yersinia spp are motile when grow in the environment but lose flagella upon adaptation to the host conditions [9,10].However even for L. monocytogenes and pathogenic Yersinia that lose their flagella at latter stages of infection, chemotaxis and flagellar motility are essential for early colonization of the gastrointestinal tract [7,11] From the point of view of pathogenesis strategies, the role of motility in the course of pathogen interactions with the surface is of the highest importance [12][13][14].Interactions of motile bacteria with the surface can be divided into a few stages: (i) landing, i.e. exit of the bacterium from the liquid bulk that is characterized by changes in flagella rotation or tumbling frequency comparatively with the behavior of bacteria within the bulk of the liquid; (ii) near-surface swimming (NSS) when short-term interactions with the surface prepare the bacterium for stopping; (iii) stopping characterized by prolonged interactions between the bacterium and the surface; (iv) docking, i.e. adhesion to the surface, or, alternatively, separation and return to the bulk in dependence on efficiency of interactions with the surface [15][16][17][18].
There are a few distinct movement modes including swimming, swarming, gliding, sliding and twitching [19].Swimming and swarming are performed via rotation of the flagella bundle while other motility modes use other surface structures and mechanisms [14,[20][21][22].Swimming is defined as motility of individual bacterial cells moving in the liquid environment that is performed via distinct patterns such as run-tumble, run-reverse or run-reverse-flick depending on the arrangement of bacterial flagella and/or other structures [23][24][25].Swimming bacteria approach the surface under a relatively big impact angles and upon approaching the surface they slow down, change the position of the body and keep near surface "nose down" swimming with the pitch angle of about 10˚and the flagellar bundle directed away from the surface [16].Swarming is defined as the motility in association with other bacterial cells in a thin film of liquid over a moist surface [14,20,23].Swarming bacteria keep their bodies parallel to the surface with average angle as low as 0.7˚ [24,[25][26][27][28]. Recently, we have demonstrated that E. coli strains with distinct modes of the landing and NSS motility demonstrate different adhesion patterns to the surface of epithelial cells [29].The E. coli strain moving in the parallel to the surface "horizontal" mode accumulated along the cell-cell border of the epithelial cell monolayer while the strain moving with high impact angles evenly distributed over the cell surface [29].To support these observations and investigate an impact of motility-driven bacterial distribution over surface on virulence, we applied developed methods to analyze motility and adhesion patterns of another enteric pathogen, L. monocytogenes.
The food-borne human pathogen L. monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular parasite that enters the body with contaminated food, crosses the intestinal barrier and colonizes internal organs including the liver, spleen, brain, placenta, and fetus by exploiting an ability to invade and multiply in nonprofessional phagocytes [30].L. monocytogenes invasion into epithelial cells and other nonprofessional phagocytes requires products of the inlAB locus, the internalin-family surface proteins InlA and InlB [31].The inlAB operon is a part of the L. monocytogenes virulence regulon and its expression is dependent on growth temperature activating at the temperature of the human body of 37˚C [32].
L. monocytogenes has four to six flagella per cell that move in a manner similar to E. coli and other peritrichous bacteria [33].Activity of the L. monocytogenes flagellar genes is temperature dependent, and the bacterium is motile at temperatures below 30˚C but is not flagellated and non-motile at 37˚C [10,33].Thus, the switch from ambient to physiological temperature downregulates flagella and upregulates the L. monocytogenes virulence regulon [10,34].Still, flagellar motility was shown to be essential for L. monocytogenes epithelial cell invasion and intestine infection [7,[35][36][37].
Besides L. monocytogenes, the genus Listeria includes 20 species, which are all but one saprophytic, i.e. obtaining nourishment from the products of organic breakdown and decay [38].The saprophyte species L. innocua is the closest to L. monocytogenes species in terms of the genetic distance [39].In contrast to L. monocytogenes, L. innocua is flagellated and motile at both ambient and human body temperatures [40].
Marquis and O'Neil demonstrated that it is motility rather than flagella themselves that improves L. monocytogenes invasion into epithelial cells [7].To understand how motility affects L. monocytogenes interactions with the host cell and to establish correlations between motility and adhesion patterns, we analyzed Listeria spp motility at the NSS stage and corresponding adhesion patterns in dependence on the surface type.Further, we evaluated effects of motility on efficiency of L. monocytogenes invasion into human cells in dependence on invasion factor production.

Bacterial strains and cultivation conditions
The L. monocytogenes strain EGDe [39] and the L. innocua strain SLCC 3379 (serovar 6a) were used.Bacteria routinely cultivated on the Brain Heart Infusion (BHI, BD, USA) medium at 22˚C.For the experiment, the isolated colony from the fresh plate was seeded into the BHI broth and grown at 22˚C or 37˚C with shaking at 180 rpm min -1 overnight.

Cell culture
The Human Epithelial type 2 (HEp-2) cells derived from larynx adenocarcinoma were cultivated in the DMEM (Paneko, Russia) medium supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA) without antibiotics at 37˚C in an atmosphere of 5% CO 2 .

NSS motility observation and characterization
The observation and characterization of Listeria spp motility was generally performed as described earlier [29].Bacteria were grown in the BHI broth at 22˚C or 37˚C overnight.Then the culture was diluted with fresh BHI (1:9 culture and BHI, respectively) and incubated at the same temperature for 7 h.When the effect of the temperature shift was analyzed, overnight culture was diluted and then incubated at 22˚C for 5 h.After that the obtained bacterial suspension was separated into two samples, one of which was kept under the same conditions, while another was moved to 37˚C, and samples were grown for 2 h more for the total time of incubation to be 7 h.
For NSS motility observation, the culture grown for 7 h was diluted up to the optical density OD 600 = 2.0 that corresponded to the cell density of 1x10 9 cfu ml -1 and the diluted culture was placed into the PLA microfluidic chamber with a straightforward channel 30 μm deep and 10 mm wide.A glass coverslip was rubbed to the surface of the chamber.A series of 30 second video images of moving bacteria were recorded at a speed of 30 frames per second by a bright field microscopy with the Zeiss Axio Scope A1 microscope (objective Achroplan 40x/0.65)equipped with a digital camera DCM510 with CMOS chip 5Mpx (China) that provided the resolution up to 2560 x 1920 px.At least 5 videos were recorded for each sample, all experiments were repeated at least 3 times.The observation was carried out at the vicinity of the channel bottom.Approximately 10 seconds of the video stream were cut for video processing and analysis.The videos were processed using the Plasma 4.0 software, which was developed to analyze active microparticles [41].The Plasma 4.0 software provided a statistical subtraction of the background, Fourier filtering of the image, frame-by-frame identification of the location of each of the bacteria to obtain coordinates of the bacteria, their trajectories, velocities, and mean-square displacements <Δr2(t)>.We took into account trajectories longer than 10 frames to eliminate false detections, specifically the blurry circles with short trajectories less than 10 frames that present throughout the preprocessing stage.

Quantification of bacterial adhesion to the plastic surface
2 ml of the overnight culture grown and diluted up to OD 600 = 2.0 as described above were added to wells of the 24-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, cat.no.142475) and incubated at the same temperature, at which the culture had been grown.After 15 or 60-minute incubation, the liquid medium and non-adsorbed bacteria were removed, the wells were washed three times with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by gentle adding, manual swirling and removing of the medium.The adhered bacteria were scraped with a sterile cotton swab and resuspended in 2 ml PBS.Decimal dilutions of the suspension were plated on the BHI agar; plates were incubated at 37˚C to count bacterial colonies 24 h later.The efficiency of adhesion was calculated as a percentage of adhered bacteria to the number of bacteria used to inoculate the well.

Visualization of bacterial adhesion to the plastic surface by light microscopy
To analyze patterns of bacterial adhesion to the plastic surface, a 1 cm 2 piece of plastic was put on the bottom of the well of the 24-well plate and the culture was added and processed as described above.After gentle washing, bacteria were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde (pH 7.2) for 10 minutes, washed again three times with sterile PBS, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.Bacteria were visualized using epifluorescence microscopy at a 1000-fold magnification using a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 microscope (objective Achroplan 100x/1.25 oil ph3) equipped with a DCM510 digital camera.

Quantification of bacterial adhesion to the surface of HEp-2 cells and characterization of adhesion patterns by light microscopy
HEp-2 cells were grown in 24-wells plates up to 70% confluence.Then 1 ml of the overnight culture grown at the temperature pointed in the text with the OD 600 = 2.0 was added to the cell monolayer.After15 or 60 minutes, bacterial suspension was removed and cells were thoroughly washed with PBS three times as described above.Then, 100 μL 1% TritonX-100 was added, cells were incubated for 15 seconds before 900 μL PBS was added.Decimal dilutions of cell lysates were plated to count the number of cell-bound bacteria as described above.Visualization of the adhesion patterns was performed after fixation of the cell monolayer with adhered bacteria with formaldehyde and staining with Hoechst 33342 as described above for bacteria adhered to the plastic surface.

Quantification of bacterial positioning over the cell surface
The relative distance of the adhered bacterium from the nucleus was determined using the light microphotographs as shown at the S1 Fig. Processing of images was performed as follows: 1) we identified the position of the bacteria and cell borders; 2) radial lines were drawn from the nominal cell center through the bacterium to the cell border; 3) the line lengths from the nucleus edge to the cell edge were divided into deciles and bacterial positions were prescribed to the particular decile.All bacteria over the cell nucleus were prescribed to the first decile.Totally 10 microphotos taken with a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 microscope equipped with a DCM510 digital camera at a 1000-fold magnification were analyzed for each sample.

Scanning electron microscopy
For SEM, cell cultures with adhered bacteria were washed and fixed as described above.SEM was performed using the Camscan S2 microscope (Cambridge Scientific Instruments, Witchford, UK) in the secondary electron imaging (SEI) mode with a 10 nm optical resolution and an operating voltage of 20 kV.The images were captured using the MicroCapture software (SMA, Moscow, Russia).

Cell invasion
Bacteria were prepared as for the adhesion assay and 1 ml was added to 70% HEp-2 cell monolayer at the OD 600 = 2 that corresponded to MOI (multiplicity of infection) � 100: 1 (bacteria: cells).Bacteria were incubated with cells for 15 or 60 minutes, then the bacterial suspension was removed, cells were washed with PBS three times and the fresh DMEM medium supplemented with 100 μg ml -1 gentamicin was added to remove extracellular bacteria.After 1 h incubation, the medium was removed, cells were gently washed with PBS three times, lysed with TritonX-100 as described above and decimal dilutions of cell lysates were plated on BHI agar to count colonies formed by intracellular bacteria.The efficiency of invasion was evaluated as the percentage of intracellular bacteria to the total number of bacteria added to the well.

ELISA
To evaluate amounts of surface-bound InlB, 100 μl overnight bacterial culture grown under conditions described in the text were added to wells of a 96-well plate.The plates were incubated at 37˚C overnight, washed three times with 250 μl of TTBS (Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20), and then free bounding sites were blocked by adding 200 μl 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) dissolved in TTBS.After 30 minutes incubation, the blocking buffer was removed and 100 μl conjugate of the rabbit polyclonal InlB specific antibodies with horseradish peroxidase (anti-InlB-HRP; [42]) diluted 1:4000 in the blocking buffer was added.Bacteria were incubated with anti-InlB-HRP at room temperature with shaking at 140 rpm for 1 hour.Then, wells were washed with TTBS 6 times and HRP enzymatic activity was revealed using 100 μl TMB substrate (Bio-Rad).To cease the reaction, 100 μl 2 M sulfuric acid was added.The optical density was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm using the iMark plate photometer (Bio-Rad).InlB amounts were detected relatively to the calibration curve that was developed using the purified protein [42].

Statistics
All experiments were repeated at least three times.The mean and standard deviation (SD) values were calculated from the entire data set where applicable.Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with the post hoc Tukey's test.The homogeneity of variance assumption was tested using Levene's test.Statistical differences were considered significant when the p-value was <0.05.

L. monocytogenes and L. innocua demonstrated similar velocity profiles at the NSS stage
Here, we compared motility patterns of two Listeria species: the pathogenic species L. monocytogenes strain EGDe (further designated as Lm) and the saprophytic species L. innocua strain SLCC 3379 (further designated as Linn).Linn was grown at 22˚C.Lm was grown at two temperatures, 22˚C and 37˚C.Lm grown at 22˚C was motile, while Lm grown at 37˚C was nonmotile (further designated as non-motile Lm) that is in agreement with temperature-dependent regulation of L. monocytogenes motility [10,33,34,40].
Bacterial motility was followed at the NSS stage, which is the last and the most important stage before stopping and surface adhesion (docking) take place.The data sets used in the calculations included 10 independent observational areas video-recorded for 10 seconds.Experimental conditions allowed monitoring of 450-500 bacteria moving within the observation plane during 10 seconds.The concentration of bacteria simultaneously in the field of view ranged 1-2 10 −3 bacteria per μm  The median velocities of motile bacteria were 20 μm/s (CI 95 19.6-20.4) and 25 μm/s (CI 95 24.8-25.5)for Lm and Linn, respectively that was more than two-times higher than the median velocity of taken as a control of Brownian movement non-motile Lm, which was 9 μm/s (CI95 8.8-9.2) (p<0.01)(Fig 1A).The median residence times demonstrated by motile Lm and Linn were similar (0.62 s (CI 95 0.6-0.65);and 0.53s (CI 95 0.52-0.54),respectively) and more than three-times shorter than the residence time of non-motile Lm (2 s (CI95 1.9-2.1);p<0.01).The median distances, i.e. the distance that individual bacteria ran within the layer before leaving, were slightly longer for motile than non-motile bacteria (8 μm (CI 95 7.8-8.2);8.1 μm (CI 95 8-8.4); and 6 μm (CI 95 5.9-6.1)for Lm, Linn, and non-motile Lm, respectively; p<0.01).Individual trajectories of motile bacteria were relatively linear compared to the individual trajectory of non-motile Lm (S1 Fig) .Taken together, these data demonstrated that average parameters of motility were similar for motile bacteria of pathogenic and saprophytic species and were distinct for motile and non-motile bacteria.
The velocity profile distribution for motile bacteria has a normal (Gaussian) character (Linn) or was close to a normal distribution (Lm) (Fig 2A).Velocity profile of non-motile Lm deviated from the normal distribution due to a noticeable prevalence of bacteria with velocities from zero to 7 μm s -1 that is in line with the absence of active motility.The distribution of instantaneous velocity directions was symmetric for non-motile Lm and asymmetric for motile bacteria (Fig 2B).Such an asymmetry suggested a coordinated motility of the individual cells [43,44].
To further characterize bacterial motility and to support the suggestion about the predominance of the directed type of motility over a chaotic component of the motion, we calculated the dependence of the mean square displacement (MSD) on time (t).For the non-motile Lm culture, a typical for the classical Brownian dynamics linear MSD time-dependence was found (Fig 1D).For motile Lm and Linn displacement MSD was proportional to the time taken to the power 1.5 (~t 1.5 ) that points to active movement in horizontal plane.
Taken together, obtained results indicate that pathogenic and saprophytic Listeria spp exhibit similar motility patterns, which are distinct from the patterns demonstrated by the control culture of non-motile Lm.

Motile Listeria spp demonstrated similar adhesion patterns while adhesion efficiencies were individual
Using the light microscopy, we analyzed adhesion patterns of non-motile and motile Listeria spp at early stages of interactions with the surface, 15 and 60 minutes after bacterial suspension was applied to a 24 well plate (Fig 3).After 15 minutes, motile bacteria of both species adhered primarily as randomly distributed single cells.Adhesion patterns of motile pathogenic and saprophytic Listeria spp were very similar after both 15 and 60 minutes suggesting that motility driven adhesion patterns do not depend on virulence traits.Non-motile bacteria were often observed as small aggregates including up to 10 cells.The plastic surface and short observation time did not allow cell division, so these groups could result rather from sedimentation of floccules formed within the liquid bulk.Taking into account all the aforementioned points, it might be suggested that motility prevented bacterial flocculation within the liquid bulk.
To quantify adhesion efficiencies, adhesion coefficients, i.e. the ratio of bacteria adhered to the plastic surface to bacteria added to the well, were calculated (Fig 3D).15 minutes post addition, the adhesion coefficient of motile Lm was at least 4.5 times less than non-motile Lm (p<0.05).Adhesion efficiency of Linn and non-motile Lm differed insignificantly (p = 0.42.).Upon prolongation of the incubation up to 60 minutes, the adhesion coefficients increased for all bacteria tested with the highest increment observed for non-motile Lm.The difference between non-motile and motile bacteria increased up to 6.2-and 2.9-times for motile Lm and Linn, respectively (p<0.05 for all).Thus, motile Listeria spp demonstrated similar adhesion patterns especially at the early stage of observation meanwhile adhesion efficiencies were individual.

Motility determined Listeria spp positioning at the surface of the HEp-2 cells
Next question we addressed was patterns of bacterial adhesion to the surface of human cervical adenocarcinoma epithelial HEp-2 cells.Non-motile Lm were distributed randomly over the cell monolayer surface including area over nuclei (Fig 4A).Formless aggregates were observed similar to aggregates on the plastic surface suggesting the same gravity-stimulated sedimentation of flocs formed by non-motile bacteria within the liquid bulk.In contrast, both motile Lm and Linn were predominantly located at the cell periphery.The difference in the number of Percentage of bacteria at cell periphery was higher for motile bacteria comparatively to nonmotile.
To get more clear evidences on bacterial distribution over cell surface, we used scanning electron microscopy (SEM).SEM supported a view of relatively uniform distribution of nonmotile bacteria, which were often represented by small flocs over cell surface including areas over the cell nucleus (Fig 5).Motile bacteria of both pathogenic and saprophytic species were less numerous and their distribution was uneven with areas of increased bacterial concentration that located mainly at the cell periphery with the increasing number of bacteria toward the cell edge and the cell-cell border.

Motility improved L. monocytogenes invasion into epithelial cells in the course of transition from the ambient temperature to the human body temperature
For L. monocytogenes as a facultative intracellular parasite, it is important that adhesion leads to cell invasion.Invasion of non-motile Lm and motile Lm into HEp-2 cells was compared using the gentamicin test.Gentamicin was added to the culture 15 and 60 minutes past bacterial addition to leave alive only intracellular bacteria.After 15-minute adhesion, the invasion efficiencies of non-motile Lm and motile Lm were low and similar (2.0 x 10 −5 % and 5.9 x We suggested that the low invasion efficiency of motile Lm could be due to repression of the virulence regulon in bacteria grown at the ambient temperature.To up-regulate the virulence regulon and particularly to increase expression of the invasion factors InlA and InlB required for active invasion into epithelial cells, we transfer the motile Lm culture to the temperature of 37˚C, that is the temperature of the human body.Up-regulation of invasion factors

Discussion
Here we characterized Listeria spp motility at the NSS stage, i.e. the stage when the bacterium moving close to the surface to have short physical contacts with it.Pathogenic L. monocytogenes (Lm) and its closest saprophytic species L. innocua (Linn) demonstrated similar characteristics of motility thus suggesting that motility patterns did not depend on virulence traits.
Following individual trajectories, we observed the anisotropy of the motion vector distribution (Fig 2B) that suggested a certain coordination of moving cells.This coordination could appear as a result of inelastic cell-cell collisions and transient motility of paired cells.Such pair-wise interactions of bacterial cells are not possible in the bulk where bacteria avoid each other but appear to be possible in the course of NSS near the surface [43,44].
To reveal a role of the NSS motility type for further interactions of bacteria with the surface, we compared adherence patterns of motile and non-motile Listeria spp docking at the plastic surface or at the surface of epithelial HEp-2 cells.Motile bacteria showed a clear difference in adhesion patterns depending on the surface type.Both pathogenic and saprophytic Listeria spp adhered to the surface as single or double cells evenly distributed over the plastic surface but preferentially adhered at the HEp-2 cell periphery avoiding surface over the cell nucleus.The last result is in line with results obtained by Misselwitz and co-workers who demonstrated for another foodborne pathogens Salmonella Typhimurium that the NSS motility results in preferential binding at sites of prominent topology, i.e. the base of rounded-up cells and membrane ruffles [15].Similar adhesion at topologically prominent sites we observed for the E. coli strain M17 [29].However, E. coli M17 preferentially adhered as sites where physical obstacles were found independently whether these were plastic or cell surface, while motile Listeria were distributed evenly over the plastic surface.Besides physical obstacles, unevenness of Listeria distribution over the cell surface might be due to sensitivity to other surface properties such as nanoscale changes in the surface slip or interactions with surface receptors [45].Still, similarity of adhesion patterns demonstrated by motile Lm and Linn evidences against receptor interactions at the stopping stage and suggested that only NSS characteristic but not virulence properties are responsible for the observed irregularity over cell surface.
Our results demonstrated that temperature-dependent up-regulation of the virulence regulon and particularly the invasion factor InlB is a key feature to give an advantage in cell invasion for motile L. monocytogenes over non-motile bacteria.When motile and non-motile L. monocytogenes expressed the invasion factor InlB at the same level, motile Lm* invaded host cells up to 8-times more efficiently comparatively with non-motile Lm.These results suggested that motility driven bacterial location at the cell periphery was important for further events required for L. monocytogenes active invasion into epithelial cells.Particularly, peripheral location might be important for interactions with cell surface receptors important for invasion that are located at the cell edge.Indeed, E-cadherin, which is cognitive receptor of the invasion factor InlA is an essential component of adherence junctions [46].The InlB receptor c-Met is largely distributed in dynamic insoluble plasma membrane fractions, known as lipid rafts, which have a tendency to move to the cell periphery and tight junctions [47,48].Thus, obtained results suggested that motility-driven bacterial accumulation at the cell periphery is advantageous for the pathogenic L. monocytogenes as it can improve the receptor-dependent cell invasion.
The 2 h shift of the L. monocytogenes culture grown at the ambient temperature to the temperature of the human body was enough to improve invasion factor expression while bacterial motility maintained.This period is comparable with the time required for contaminated food to enter the intestine suggesting that the mechanisms involving upregulation of invasion factor together with the motility maintenance might be active in the human infection.
Taken together, obtained results demonstrated that the Listeria spp NSS motility does not depend on virulence traits.Similar motility and adhesion patterns of the pathogenic species L. monocytogenes and its saprophytic counterpart L. innocua excludes a role of virulence factors in the uneven bacterial distribution over cell surface suggesting that it is specific NSS motility that defined Listeria spp prevailed distribution at the cell periphery.Such a peripheral location improved L. monocytogenes invasion into human cells under conditions of temperaturedependent up-regulation of virulence factors.Obtained results suggested that motility-driven bacterial accumulation at the cell periphery can be advantage for pathogens, interacting with receptors located at apical junctions.
2 .Main characteristics of bacterial motility are shown in Fig 1, including individual instantaneous velocities (Fig 1A), characteristic distances, representing lengths of bacterial paths, which were calculated as major diagonals of polygons circumscribed around bacterial trajectories (Fig 1B), residence time, i.e. a time that an individual bacterium stayed within the horizontal layer (microscope field of view) before leaving (Fig 1C) and mean square displacements (MSD) on time (t) (Fig 1D).

Fig 4 .
Fig 4. Adhesion to the surface of epithelial cells HEp-2.(A)-adhesion patterns of Lm, non-motile Lm and Linn over the HEp-2 epithelial cell monolayer 60 minutes post bacterial addition to the cell monolayer; white arrows point bacterial cell positions.(B)-adhesion efficiencies showed as a percentage of adhered bacteria to the number of added bacteria; (C)-distribution of bacteria relatively to the cell nucleus (see Materials and methods).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290842.g004

Fig 6 .
Fig 6.L. monocytogenes invasion efficiency into HEp-2 cells in dependence on motility and InlB production.(A)invasion efficiencies of Lm and non-motile Lm, bacteria were co-incubated with HEp-2 cells 15 or 60 minutes before gentamicin was added.(B)-InlB production levels: InlB was detected on the bacterial surface using ELISA as described in Matetrials and Methods.(C)-individual trajectories of Lm* bacteria grown at 22˚C and shifted to 37˚C for two h; (D)-distribution of individual velocities for Lm (rose; grown at 22˚C), non-motile Lm (blue, grown at 37˚C), and Lm* (yellow; grown at 22˚C followed by the 2h shift to 37˚C) cultures; (E)-invasion efficiencies of Lm* and non-motile Lm, bacteria were co-incubated with HEp-2 cells 15 or 60 minutes before gentamicin was added.Lm-the culture was grown at 22˚C overnight, bacteria were motile; InlB production was low; non-motile Lm-the culture was grown at 37˚C overnight, bacteria were non-motile; InlB production was high; Lm*-the culture was grown at 22˚C overnight and then shifted to 37˚C, bacteria were motile; InlB production was high.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290842.g006