Factors related to lower limb performance in children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Background The literature identifies several factors that are associated with lower limb performance (LLP). However, there is little consensus on which factors have the major associations with LLP. Objective Examine, analyze and summarize the scientific evidence on the factors associated with the performance of LLP in children and adolescents of both sexes aged between 7 and 17 years. Design This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and was registered in PROSPERO. Data sources A systematic literature search of five electronic databases (i.e., SPORTDiscus, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS) with date restrictions was conducted (2010 to 2021). Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Eligibility criteria included (i) a study published between 2010 and 2021; (ii) a research study with observational design; (iii) a study analyzing LLP; and (iv) a sample composed of young people between 7 and 17 years old (regardless of sex). Analyses Literature analysis was carried out in English and Portuguese between 2018 and 2021, “blindly” by two researchers. For data sorting, Rayyan® was used. Data extraction and evidence analysis were performed “blindly”, using the Loney scale. The minimum items for observational studies were analyzed by the STROBE checklist. Meta-analyses were conducted based on age group (Childhood [7 to 11 Yrs] and Adolescence [12 to 17 Yrs]) and puberty stages (i.e., Prepupertal and Pubertal). The heterogeneity between the samples of the studies was assessed using the “Cochran’s Q” and “I^2” statistics. Meta-regression analyses were performed to check the factors related to heterogeneity of the studies and to check the associations between chronological age and LLP. Results The literature search resulted in 1,109,650 observational studies of which 39 were included in this review. Through Meta-analysis and Meta-regressions, it was possible to indicate that advancing chronological age related to increased LLP (p<0.01), and that in relation to puberty stages pubertal subjects had higher LLP than their pre-pubertal peers (p<0.01). Discussion The main findings of the present systematic review suggest that as chronological age advances (childhood to adolescence), neuromuscular systems mature and this may be due to advancing puberty, which is also associated with an increase in LLP. Conclusion The factors associated with lower limbs performance are still inconsistent in the literature. However, advancing chronological age and stage of puberty are both associated with increased lower limbs performance. Trial registration ID-PROSPERO-CRD42020137925.


Introduction
For children and adults, lower limbs performance (LLP) is considered a significant component for high performance in several sports (e.g,basketball, volleyball, football, karate, etc.) [1][2][3][4]. In addition, LLP is seen as an extremely important factor in determining physical fitness (i.e., competence in performing muscle work in a way that does not require high effort), and contributes to the performance of daily activities such as running, walking, sitting, and being able to get-up [5][6][7]. During childhood and adolescence, because of these relationships, LLP can be used as an indicator of motor performance and functional health (locomotors functions) [8,9]. the guidelines of the EQUATOR Reports (Improving the Quality and Transparency of Health Research). It was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: n˚CRD42020137925). In addition, this review strictly complied with all the criteria required by the AMSTAR check list (i.e., tool developed to judge the methodological quality of systematic reviews) [28].

Identification of studies and search strategy
In order to systematically define the initial details of the research strategy for the production of this review, the scheme described by the Joanna Briggs Institute was adopted, where the structure helps in defining the steps to be followed for the construction of the systematic review [29]. The method recommends the prior definition of the study population, the study interventions and the design of studies that are part of the review [29]. Thus, the population of the present study was defined as young people aged between 7 and 17 years old; the intervention considered was the evaluation of the LLP and the types of studies considered were observational.
For searches of academic articles in the databases, descriptors registered on the DEC's and MeSH platforms were used primarily, the descriptors were connected through the Boolean operators OR / AND. It should be noted that the usual terms referring to the descriptors were also connected during the searches. Thus, the search strategy used was: Child OR Children AND Adolescent OR Adolescents OR Teenagers AND Performance AND Potency Muscle AND Explosive force AND Muscle Power. The searches were performed with the same word grid translated into Portuguese.
The aforementioned search strategy word grid was used in four phases of the present study (2nd semester 2018, 1st semester 2019, 2nd semester 2019, 1st semester 2020, details in the results section). However, the results were not satisfactory, which led the research team to review the methodology of the present study. After a thorough review, the word grid of the search strategy underwent changes in the Boolean operators: Child AND Children OR Adolescent AND Adolescents AND Teenagers OR Performance AND Potency Muscle OR Explosive force OR Muscle Power. The searches were performed with the same grid of words translated into Portuguese. The updated word grid in the search strategy was used in two more stages of the study (2nd semester 2020, 1st semester 2021, details in the results section), and the results were satisfactory.

Eligibility of the studies criteria
The evaluation of the eligibility of the studies was carried out independently by two researchers (P.F.A-N. and V.M.M.O.), using the electronic research platforms: PubMed, CINAHL, SPORT Discus, Google Scholar and SCOPUS (when available, the advanced search feature was used), between January 2018 and February 2021. The searches were made in both English and Portuguese. Intitaly, studies were considered for inclusion based on titles and abstracts. This procedure was organized in three separate steps: the first aimed to search the digital databases, while the second and third were aimed at identifying new publications. For the selection of works, the following eligibility criteria were adopted: (i) a study published between 2010 and 2021; (ii) a research study with observational design; (iii) a study analysing LLP; and (iv) a sample composed of young people between 7 and 17 years old (regardless of sex).

Data extraction
Data sorting occurred with the aid of the online tool Rayyan QCRI 1 [30]. Rayyan QCRI 1 is an open source application that allows the author, collaborators and research supervisor to have access to the systematic review data, ensuring the blindness of researchers during searches and data extraction [30]. The extraction of data and analysis of the quality of the evidence, were carried out "blindly" by two different researchers (P.F.A-N. and V.M.M.O.), each performed the recording of the main data from the studies. Subsequently, all researchers gathered the main results of the articles included in this review; it should be noted that only the data referring to LLP were maintained after data extraction.

Criteria for risk of bias assessment
The risk assessment of biases was carried out in a "blind" way, by three different researchers (I. K.S., P.M.S.D. and B.G.A.T.C.), using the quality scale of observational studies proposed by Loney et al. [31]. The final results of the evaluations were optimized and discussed by all the researchers involved (P. 2) The sample base and the sample size were not adequate. 3) Objective, adequate and standardized criteria for the outcome were not used. 4) The outcome was measured in a skewed manner. 5) Results are not given with a confidence interval when appropriate. 6) The study does not expose practical applicability. 7) The study has no reproducibility for other samples from different populations.

Analysis of the basic requirements that must be part of an observational study
It was verified whether the studies contained in the sample met the requirements required by STROBE (i.e., List of minimum items that must be integrated into observational studies) [32].

Analyses and synthesis of results
The effects of interventions that compared LLP among young people of different maturation stages [Pre-pubertal x Pubertal] and different age groups [7 to 17 years] were measured by the difference in standardized means and grouped using random effect models. The heterogeneity between the studies was assessed using the "Cochran's Q" and "I^2" statistics. Studies were considered heterogeneous when: I^2> 50% [33]. Subgroup meta-analysis (considering sample sex, LLP assessment protocol and biological maturation assessment protocol)] and metaregression (considering sample size, chronological age and age group) were used to assess possible sources of heterogeneity. Meta-regression was performed to determine whether chronological age (7 to 17 years) and age group (childhood (chronological age: 7 to 11 yrs) and adolescence (chronological age: 12 to 17 yrs)) were influencing LLP.
The agreement values of the studies in relation to the STROBE criteria were indicated in percentiles. The relative value of 100% was taken into account for the total number of items on the chek list. Subsequently, the relative value of items in which the studies were in accordance with the chek in list STROBE was calculated. The Kappa reliability index was calculated among the evaluators, to verify the degree of reliability in relation to the criteria of the bias analysis scale. The magnitude used was: absent [34] Table 1 shows the number of articles found in each database according to the search criteria, by semester, during the data collection period. The first 4 semesters correspond to the first research strategy, and the last two semesters correspond to the data resulting from the adjusted research grid (See Section: Identification of Studies and Search Strategy). Thus, in the year 2019 and in the first stage of the year 2020 the searches took as the starting date the day of the previouse search. In the second half of 2020, searches considered the time interval identified in the search strategy (2010 to 2020), and in 2021 searches were made taking as the starting date the day of the previous search.

Characterization of the studies included in the present review
In relation to the main outcomes of the studies conclusions included in this systematic review, the level of physical activity is identified as a determining factor for LLP in individuals of both sexes in 8% (n = 3) of the studies (see Table 2). In other words, subjects with a higher level of physical activity had higher LLP capacity. In addition, 18% (n = 8) of the articles indicated that advanced biological maturation significantly influenced the LLP of male subjects, while 3% (n = 1) of studies found a similar result in female subjects and 8% (n = 3) of the texts had similar conclusions for subjects of both sexes. However, another 6% (n = 2) of authors stated that, for females, biological maturation was not a determining factor for LLP. It was observed that 3% (n = 1) of the articles affirm that puberty and the levels of steroid hormones were determinant for LLP in female individuals and 3% (n = 1) of papers indicated similar result in male athletes. In contrast 3% (n = 1) of studies indicated that only steroid

PLOS ONE
Lower limb performance in children and adolescents: A systematic review with meta-analysis There was significant variance in the continuous vertical jump test for 5 seconds in relation to puberty. Thus, the process of increasing LLP in pubertal subjects is greater than in post-pubertal. • Analysis of body composition.
• LLP test: Horizontal jump. LLP in G2 and G3 was significantly higher among subjects with normal and late maturation stages. Thus LLP is influenced by puberty, in individuals in more advanced stages and with a chronological age above 12 years.
• Analysis of puberty (X-ray of hand and wrist) Silva and Oliveira [19] • 128 female adolescents.
• LLP test: Vertical thrust. There was no difference in the strength of lower limbs between the groups (non-matured and matured). Thus, maturation did not influence the LLP of female adolescents.
• LLP test: Horizontal jump. Male subjects had superior LLP compared to female subjects, regardless of age group. In addition, advanced chronological age was associated with increased LLP in males. • LLP test by Standing long jump. In general, young people living in rural environments had better physical fitness than young people living in urban environments. However, for LLP, the environment in which they live did not show any significant associations. Age: children from 7 to 12 years old, and teenagers from 13 to 16 years old.
• Check if the environment in which you live (Urban vs. Rural) was associated with physical fitness.
• LLP test: Horizontal jump. Girls and boys active in extracurricular exercise programs showed better LLP when compared to their peers. • Age: between 11 and 14 years old.
• Groups: practitioners and nonpractitioners of extracurricular exercise programs.
• LLP test: Analyzed the isokinetic strength of the knee joint using a dynamometer.
• Verified the relationship between puberty and the strength of the knee joint Aouichaoui et al. [22] • 391 young athletes (208 boys and 183 girls).
Chronological age, body weight, height and fat free weight were indicated as predictors of LLP performance. • Age: between 7 and 13 years.
• LLP test: vertical jump (intermitents for 30-s). Young people inserted in a modality that allowed more sports stimuli showed superiority in LLP, compared to those inserted in a specific modality such as soccer.
Hoshikawa et al. [40] • 24 soccer players and 11 subjects from the control group, both male.
• LLP test: Analyzed the dynamic force during knee extension and flexion at 1.05 rad / s with a dynamometer.
After 6 months, participation in competitive football training did not increase LLP.
• Age: 12 and 13 years old • Evaluated the sample at baseline moments and after 6 months.
With the advancement of puberty, the knee extension strength increased (p <0.05). The strength of the hamstring / quadriceps ratio decreased from pre-pubertal to pubertal stages (p <0.05). Suggesting, imbalances between the hamstrings and the strength of the quadriceps that seemed to arise with the advancement of puberty.
• 12 months of follow-up, carrying out evaluations every four months.
(Continued ) Intragroup LLP did not change significantly (p> 0.05). Indoor soccer group were superiore compared to the handball group, in the pre-and postintervention conditions in relation to LLP.
• Groups: Indoor Soccer and Handball.
• 12 weeks of training and sports gestures related to futsal and handball sports.
Age, weight, trunk height, waist circumference, fatfree mass and leg muscle volume were significant predictor of LLP in boys. Body weight was the best predictor of LLP in girls. • Age: between 13 and 17 years old.
• LLP test: Horizontal jump. The LLP of the investigated students were predominantly located in the "weak" level, in both sexes. • Age: between 7 and 10 years.
• LLP test: vertical jump. The levels of maturation, testosterone and estradiol played an important role in the physical aspects and in the performance of motor skils of LLP in adolescents (both sex).
• Analysis of puberty (bone age predictive equation).
• Testosterone and estradiol analysis.
Peak torque (pT) and peak torque development rate (pRDT) were not related to LLP (p> 0.05). Dynamic pT and pRTD, normalized for body mass, were related to LLP in all tests (r = 0.38-0.66, p <0.05).

• LLP test by vertical jump and jump against movement
Athletes with advanced puberty showed higher concentrations of lean mass and superiorr LLP (p <0.05). Puberty interacted with lean mass (η 2 p = 0.753). Lean mass showed a local effect (ƒ 2 ) higher than that of puberty for LSS.
• Puberty analyzed by the peak growth rate.
• Controlled the covariate sex by ANCOVA test.
• LLP Analyzed by dynamometer: peak values of isokinetic-concentric torque of the hamstrings (H) and quadriceps (Q), as well as the conventional strength relationships of H: Q and angular velocities of 60, 180 and 300˚�s -1 The absolute isokinetic-concentric muscle strength was significantly higher (p <0.001) in the soccer group aged 12 and 16, compared to the control group, for knee flexors and extensors. No significant differences were found between soccer players and the 14-year-old control group for the muscle groups of Q and H. • Age: 12 to 16 years • Analyzed whether soccer training was associated with LLP.
(Continued ) hormones were determinants for LLP in individuals of both sexes. Regarding the biomechanical experience in performing jumps (task specificity) for the use of the LLP, 8% (n = 3) of the studies found that it is a significant factor, while another 8% (n = 3) indicated that it is an irrelevant factor for LLP. Anthropometric characteristics (8% of texts (n = 3)), sex (6% of texts (n = 2)), advanced chronological age (12% of texts (n = 6)) and body morphology (6% of texts (n = 2)) were also identified as factors associated with higher levels of LLP (See Table 2).

Data groupings
In Fig 3 studies are grouped dependant on available means and standard deviations data of LLP by sex and age group. Thus, two groups were formed: Childhood (formed from data from subjects aged 7 to 11 years) and adolescence (formed from data from subjects aged 12 to 17 years). It was found that, with respect to the overall effect, the adolescence group had higher LLP when compared to the childhood group (Fig 3A). This was verified by subgroup analyses which showed that this occured regardless of sex and the jumping protocol used to analyze LLP (Fig 3B and 3C). However, the data grouped in Fig 3 shows a very high heterogeneity, indicating that although the overall effect favors the adolescent group, there are perculiarities in the studies that require caution when analyzing this finding. Given the heterogeneity of the results found in the data grouping in Fig 3, a meta-regression analyses was performed to explain the reasons for the wide heterogeneity among the studies grouped by age group. Thus, it was indicated the high heterogeneity among the studies could be accounted for by the variety of sample sizes of the surveys (which ranged from 24 to 2758 subjects) and the variety of chronological age of the samples grouped by age groupings, which ranged from 7 to 11 years for childhood and from 12 to 17 years for adolescence (See Table 3).
In addition, Fig 4 displays the metaregression analysis that encompassed the studies that compared LLP in different chronological age groups (ranging from 7 to 17 years), indicating that chronological age was related to increased LLP in males (Point estimate: 1. 9; Standard error: 0.04, 95% CI: 1.7; 2.0; Z: 39.1; p<0.001) and females (Point estimate: 0.3; Standard error: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.3; 0.4; Z: 10.1; p<0.001), and that chronological age explained the heterogeneity among the studies grouped in Fig 3 by 70% for males and 68% for females.
In Fig 5 studies were grouped by those studies which had means and standard deviations of LLP when analysing by stage of biological maturation (pre-pubertal and pubertal). Thus, the overall effect of the analyses indicated that subjects during puberty had superior LLP when • Analysis of puberty by X-ray of the hand and wrist.
• Sample segregated at puberty: early, medium and late.
• LLP test: Squat jump. Sexual maturation was related to LLP (r = 0.61, p <0.0001). Young people with advanced sexual maturity showed superiorite LLP in relation to those with late sexual maturation.
• Analysis of puberty (predictive equation for sex maturation).
• LLP test by squat jump and countermovement jump The individual differences that occured during puberty influenced the development of LLP in adolescent basketball athletes. In addition, the increase in LLP was related to the increase in body weight.
• Longitudinal follow-up of 3 years, evaluations took place at intervals of 6 months.
• Analysis of puberty by peak heigth velocity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258144.t002 compared to their pre-pubertal peers (Fig 5A). However, subgroup analyses indicated that for male subjects the result remained similar to the global one identified (Fig 5B), while for female subjects there was no significant difference between the subgroups (Fig 5C). For the aforementioned analyses, the levels of heterogeneity between the studies were acceptable (<25%). Fig 6 reports the analysis of biases of the analysed studies. In general ( Fig 6A) and individually (Fig 6B), studies presented a high risk for not presenting confidence intervals appropriate for their studies. Thus, 10% of studies indicate d high methodological quality (i.e., low risk in all criteria of the Loney scale [31]), while 59% displayed moderate methodological quality (i.e., high risk or uncertain risk in one or two items of the Loney scale [31]), and 31% indicated low methodological quality (i.e., high risk or uncertain risk in three or more items on the Loney scale [31]). When analyzing each item in the Loney [31], 80% of the analyzed articles indicated low risk of bias for subjects related to the sample, the outcome and the reproducibility of the research. However, 80% of the studies did not present the confidence intervals in the statistical analysis and about 46% of the authors did not indicate practical applicability for the study results. In addition, the percent agreement of the studies with the STROBE requirements for observational studies are shown in the figures, which was used to help interpret the basic Table 3. Meta-regression analyses to justify the heterogeneity found among the studies in the meta-analyses regarding the different age groups (childhood and adolescence).

PLOS ONE
Lower limb performance in children and adolescents: A systematic review with meta-analysis methodological requirements of each study included in this systematic review. Thus, four studies showed agreement between 27 and 30%, four articles showed agreement between 33 and 39%, five studies showed agreement between 45 and 48%, ten studies showed agreement between 50 and 56%, three studies showed agreement above 70%, six studies agreement between 80 and 87% and six studies showed agreement above 90% with the STROBE requirements ( Fig 3B). It is noteworthy that the Kappa coefficient reliability index among the three evaluators was �0.723 (p = 0.02), which indicates good compatibility in relation to the bias analysis and in relation to the STROBE analysis.
Regarding the most frequently omitted STROBE by the studies, failure to explain the study hypothesis, this occurred in~90% of the articles,~86% of the studies did not state the research design in the manuscript title,~75% of the studies omitted the sample recruitment process, 65% did not report whether confounding factors were controlled for during study procedures, and~88% did not address possible efforts to minimize biases during the research.

Discussion
The objective of this systematic review was to analyse factors associated with performance of lower limbs (LLP) in young boys and girls aged between 7 and 17 years.
The main findings indicated that advancing chronological age related to increased LLP, and that pubertal youth demonstrated higher LLP than their pre-pubertal peers. In addition, among the individual results of the studies gathered in the present review, it was found that body morphology was related to LLP. In this sense, our findings suggest that as chronological age advances (childhood to adolescence) a maturation of biological systems occurs and that consequently the phenomena triggered (i.e., growth spurt, increase in androgenic hormones, increase in lean mass levels, etc.) by puberty was associated with LLP.
When we grouped the studies by age group the results suggested that the transition between childhood and adolescence is related to LLP, where adolescents have superior values to their peers who are in childhood. However, the grouping of data pointed out a high heterogeneity (I 2 >50%), to try to identify the tail of the heterogeneity we performed subgroup analyses considering the jumping protocols used to analyze LLP, however the heterogeneity was reduced by less than 10% in the male and female groups, still being above 50%. Thus, the different jumping protocols used to analyze LLP do not seem to have influenced the high heterogeneity among the studies.
When performing meta-regression analyses to identify the factors that might be associated with high heterogeneity, it was found that variability in sample size among the pooled studies (which ranged from 24 to 2758 subjects) and variability in chronological age in the Childhood (from 7 to 11 years) and Adolescence (from 12 to 17 years) groups were associated with high heterogeneity. Through a new meta-regression we identified that advancing chronological age was associated with increased LLP, and that this association explained the heterogeneity across studies by 70% for males and 68% for females.
In this sense, based on the present systematic review when disregarding sex (male and female) the stage of puberty may have beeen a factor associated with LLP. Thus, for both sexes, pubescent subjects showed higher levels of LLP than prepubescent subjects. However, when considering the male and female subgroups for protocol for the analysis of biological maturation, it was found that male pubertal subjects perform better in LLP than their prepubertal peers, regardless of the protocol used (i.e., skeletal age and sexual maturation). Howere no differences were found in females subgroups (i.e., skeletal age, sexual maturation and menarche). This can be explained by the fact that peak biological maturity in female subjects occured about two to three years earlier compared to their male peers [18,61,62]. In addition, there were a low number of studies in each analyzed subgroup, it is suggested that by increasing the sample size in the subgroups, the results could have pointed to significant differences.
The heterogeneity, although among the studies was acceptable, we must consider that the grouped studies used different indirect protocols (i.e., equations, age at menarche and secondary sexual characteristics) to identify the stages of puberty. When assessing puberty by indirect methods, at the end of the analyses the tools generate numerical scores that group subjects into puberty levels that can vary in three stages for skeletal age (1: late or pre-pubertal. 2: average or pubertal. 3: early or post-pubertal), in two stages for age at menarche (1: pre-pubertal. 2: pubertal), and in up to 5 stages for secondary sexual characteristics (1: pre-pubertal. 2 to 4: pubertal. 5: post-pubertal) [3,13,18,19]. This variety in methods of classification may have influenced the results of the present study.
When considering articles that were not part of the meta-analysis, due to the non-information of the central tendency measures of the maturational groups, this variability in the estimation of pubertal status contradicts the findings, demonstrating the absence of a consensus on the relationship of puberty with LLP [3,19,24,35,36,40,47,48,53,54]. We emphasize that one must also consider confounding factors related to the puberty process that may also influence or relate to LLP, such as body morphology for example.
It is known that with the advancement of puberty there will increase the physiological stimuli that promote the secretion of androgenic hormones such as testosterone and estradiol [3,18,24,63]. In subjects of both sexes the increased levels of hormones may favor lean mass gain [64,65]. However, there is a strong interaction of adequate nutrition and the level of physical training in relation to reaching the apex this is favoring [10]. In this context, the level of physical activity and time of exercise can also provide the subjects with a greater biomechanical experience in performing jumps, and other specific movements of sports that have the predominance of the lower limbs such as running and kicking, for example [66]. Thus, according to the review carried out by the present study (See Table 2), it was possible to suggest that the mastery of the technique (i.e., biomechanical factors linked to the vertical jump or the counter-movement jump) was associated with the specific training of the sport to which the subjects were part of (i.e., volleybal, basketball, soccer, etc.) as well as the level of physical activity, [21, 37, 39, 41-42, 45, 49].
Regarding the quality of the articles contained in the present review, the sampling power and reproducibility indicated low levels of bias (See Fig 6B), suggesting that the outcomes of the research results contained in this review were appropriate. However, most of the studies analysed by the present review did not present the confidence intervals (CI) of their findings. It is known that CIs are used to indicate the reliability of an estimate [67]. Thus, among similar estimates, those that indicate a narrowe CI indicate more reliable results in relation to those with a wider CI [67]. Moreover, 36% of the articles brought together in this review, did not indicate a practical applicability for their results. Research without practical applicability does not offer objectivity, which can make it unfeasible for the professional field and unattractive for readers [68].
Within this perspective, the analyses of the present study also indicated that a significant amount of studies included in this review (59%, see Fig 6B), presented less than 70% of the essential items for an observational study, and this may suggest caution when interpreting the findings identified. Methodological flaws can be easily committed when the requirements involved in the design of a research study are not understood, which can skew the results to inadequate estimates [32,[69][70][71].
The present study has among its strengths the fact that the methodology has been turned to the analysis of observational studies, which are seldome explored in systematic review articles. Identifying that there are several divergences in relation to the methodologies used in these studies, is useful in encouraging future studies to seek a higher methodological quality in relation to the criteria required for this type of scientific research. In addition, this review contributes to the work of health and sport professionals, in helping them explain what factors should be analysed and / or stimulated to favor the LLP in children and adolescents.
However, the present study has the following limitations: (i) The set of descriptors used in the methodology has a limited scope; (ii) Despite the relevance, the databases used may not have been enough for the collection of studies available on the subject.

Conclusion
It is concluded that the factors associated with lower limbs performance in youths of both sexes in the age group between 7 and 17 years old are still inconsistent in the literature. However, both advancing chronological age and stage of puberty are associated with increased lower limbs performance. In addition, the studies reviewed suggest that the level of physical activity, body morphology and hormonal factors are additional factors associated with the lower limbs performance.