The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Anticholinergic plants of the family Solanaceae have a long history of use as medicines, poisons, and recreational drugs. Though they were the intoxicating substances of choice throughout Europe for centuries, their use for these purposes has declined with the globalisation of other recreational drugs. The present study sought to examine the level of knowledge surrounding these plants among individuals who had used other hallucinogenic plants or mushrooms in Slovenia. Participants were questioned in regards to the anticholinergic Solanaceae that are known to grow wild in Slovenia:
Perhaps best known for its range of useful crop plants such as tomatoes, potatoes, eggplants, and bell peppers, the Solanaceae is a widespread and popular botanical family. In addition to their uses for food, however, this family also contains plants that are rich in alkaloids that make them incredibly deadly. Among these plants, a small sub-group are known to be not only toxic, but also hallucinogenic.
These plants, sometimes called nightshades or hexing herbs, have been used in Europe for as long as history has been recorded, finding use as recreational substances [
These cognitive effects allowed these plants to become important recreational substances throughout Europe, thus being employed to induce intentional altered states of consciousness for amusement; indeed, there are known to be surprisingly few native hallucinogenic plants in Europe, so though these plants are potentially deadly, they were widely employed [
That being said, in the modern day, a seemingly endless body of knowledge is available to anyone with the resources to connect to the internet. As access to this "novel global knowledge" has increased, local traditional knowledge seems to have come to play less of a role for many. The boundary between these two forms of knowledge, however, is perhaps not so clear. Though some would argue that ethnobotanical studies should seek to ascertain whether knowledge is traditional or newly gained through modern media, others would argue that the very notion of "traditional" knowledge as many of us hold it is fundamentally flawed in its manner of trying to pin the ever-changing face of knowledge systems down to a single static moment in time [
However, we can appreciate that the knowledge of today will be viewed as the tradition of tomorrow. Whether handed down by a shaman over generations or through a university professor or the internet, the knowledge that a group holds about certain plants speaks volume as to their importance and role within the culture. As such, even "new" knowledge is of importance within an ethnobotanical (and indeed more widely within an anthropological) framework.
As the plants presently discussed function as hallucinogens, it is also worth noting their use in ritual. Though they are known to have been used recreationally throughout Europe for centuries, very little knowledge about their use in ceremonial manners has been passed down, and thus their modern uses among pagan groups have required creative elements of reconstruction and novel innovation [
The following article provides a glimpse into the world of varying and hybridised sources of knowledge through the aforementioned anticholinergic plants of the Solanaceae. Within Slovenia, these are
Participants who had previously used hallucinogenic plants and mushrooms were recruited through a combination of advertisements on social media and posters located throughout the capital city of Slovenia as well as through word of mouth. The interviews for the current study were connected with those for another project involving a general survey of the use of hallucinogenic plants and mushrooms in Slovenia, and as such, so too were the recruitment materials [
In order to ensure informed consent, participants were told of the purpose of the study and how results would be shared, as well as that they would be able to retract their answers prior to publication should they wish it. Participants were informed that their names would be kept anonymous, and those being interviewed in person were asked if they were comfortable being audio recorded during the process. For those wishing to fill out electronic questionnaires, these were sent by email along with instructions. These questionnaires also served as the basis of the structured interviews that were given to the participants. Those to be interviewed in person gave consent verbally while those filling out the questionnaires did so implicitly in accordance with the submitting of the information.
Our institution does not have an ethical review board for ethnographic research, as it is not required. All research was, however, carried out in accordance with the principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki and to the highest possible level of ethical rigour.
Individuals who participated were told both the Latin and Slovene names of the plants in question and asked to provide their knowledge based solely upon that. Name was chosen for this purpose as many may have heard of the plants from family, in the media, or in books, but not had the skills to identify them by seeing a photograph or voucher specimen. For each plant, participants were asked a series of questions pertaining to general knowledge and knowledge acquisition, potential uses, as well as their natural environment and appearance.
Both types of data gathering were carried out between September 2018 and December 2019.
67 individuals participated in this study, with ages ranging from 18–60 with a mean age of 28 (SD = 8.45).
51 of these individuals identified their biological sex as male, while 16 identified as female. All female participants and 50 of the male participants identified as cisgender, while one of the male participants identified as non-binary.
60 of the participants defined their sexuality as heterosexual, while 3 stated they were bisexual, 2 homosexual, one pansexual, and one undefined.
63 of the 68 participants listed their nationality as Slovenian, one as French/Slovenian, and one as Serbian/Slovenian. 2 of the participants were not Slovenian (one from Russia and one from Serbia), but both live within the country. One of the participants grew up in Croatia near the border and moved to Slovenia later in life.
34 of the participants live in Ljubljana (the capital city) or the surrounding area in central Slovenia. 11 live in Gorenjska, 10 live in Primorska, 6 live in Dolenjska, one lives in Štajerska, and one lives in Prekmurje. Additionally, 2 participants are currently international students, though they are originally from Slovenia.
On average, each participant believed they knew 1.6 of the 4 plants when given the Latin and Slovene names. 16 of the individuals did not recognise any of the plants by name, 17 recognised one, 15 recognised 2, 14 recognised 3, and 5 recognised all 4 plants by name.
For ease of viewing, the most frequent responses for each of the following plants have been summarised in
N = 67.
Number to recognise the name | 44 | 40 | 15 | 11 |
Number to have used it | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
Number to know people who used it | 10 | 20 | 1 | 2 |
How first learned of | From family (9) | Internet (9) | University classes (5) | University classes (2) |
Knowledge of plant | Toxic (12) | Toxic (5), many media cases of deaths from it (5) | Nightshade family (2), contains scopolamine (2) | Chemically similar to |
Knowledge of use | Recreational/psychoactive drug (8) | Recreational use (34) | European witchcraft (5) | European witchcraft (2) |
Physical and habitat description | Blue-black-purple berries (9) | Trumpet/bell-like flowers (10) | Yellow-white/black flowers (3) | Flowers that are purple and bell-shaped/look like |
Potential misidentifications |
When asked how they had first learned about this plant, responses were varied. The most common means of hearing about this plant (accounting for 9 individuals) involved a range of responses pertaining to grandparents, parents, or older siblings warning them about the plant when they were children and telling them that it was incredibly poisonous. The next most common means, accounting for 7 of the individuals, was through a university course, either pharmacology or botany. Books accounted for 3 more while the internet was the source for 2 of the individuals. 3 had also heard about the plant through friends who had tried the plant or who knew of people who had tried it and had horrific stories about the experience. One individual knew about this plant as a result of its use in homeopathy.
In terms of what they knew about the plant, its toxicity was most commonly listed, being mentioned by 12 of the participants. 4 mentioned that it contained atropine, while an additional 2 mentioned that the fruit contained atropine. 2 stated that it had similar alkaloids to
Among participants, 25 knew of uses for this plant; they listed a variety, with the most common use (listed 8 times) being as a recreational or psychoactive drug; the berries were specified for this use multiple times, though one participant also mentioned the flowers. It was then said among 6 individuals that it used to be used by witches, with one person specifying they would use the root to make ointments that they inserted into their vaginas. 5 individuals said that it used to be used cosmetically as eye drops to dilate the pupils. The next most common uses were listed 3 times, and were that the plant used to be used medicinally, or that it used to be used as a poison. Listed twice was that its berries used to be (or still are) used to strengthen alcohol, that it used to be used as a ritual sacrament in Slovenia, and that it is used in homeopathy, with one of the participants stating that it is useful for fevers. Additional items listed included that shamans used to use it to connect to wolf spirits, that it was used for treating asthma and dermatitis, that prostitutes used to use it so they would not recognise their clients, that it was an antidote to nerve gas, that it is an industrial source for the extraction of atropine, that it prevents heart ischemia, and that it is used in modern eye examinations to dilate the pupils.
Among the 67 participants, only 10 personally knew people who had made use of the plant, usually for recreational purposes, though one individual’s family uses the plant as a homeopathic medicine and one individual stated that their grandmother ate the berries when she was young as she thought they looked appealing. One individual did not know anyone personally, but had heard a story about a ritual that took place recently in Croatia where people ingested this plant and one of them fell into a fire and died.
Only 11 people claimed to know what
Among the individuals to know of this plant, the internet was the most common way of first hearing about it; this accounted for 9 individuals, with one of these specifying Erowid and one online documentaries. The next most common way of learning about this plant was through friends, with 8 of the participants first having heard of it in this manner. University courses were how 5 people found out about this plant, while books were mentioned by 4 individuals. Each stated by 3 individuals were public knowledge, knowing of people who had used it, and hearing about it in the news. Also mentioned were a trip guide, grandparents, and urban legends; additionally, one participant had learned of this plant while being told about
In regards to what they knew of this plant, one thought that it is endemic to Slovenia, and one that it grows here both wild and as an ornamental. 3 individuals knew that it is from the family Solanaceae, 4 that it contains scopolamine, 2 that it contains alkaloids, and one that it contains anticholinergic substances. Each listed once were its use in ophthalmology, in anaesthesia, to dilate pupils, and in "mind control". 5 participants described the plant as being very poisonous while a further 2 stated that it was dangerous. One stated that only overdose on the plant is toxic, while another stated that the plant is so toxic that humans cannot safely touch it. Another participant mentioned that the plant is so dangerous that police often remove it from the cities. 5 people mentioned that it has caused some deaths over the years that have made their way into the news, with 2 of these individuals specifying cases where the victims drowned. Another participant also stated that there are many stories of people taking this plant and things going wrong. One other stated it is not a smart thing to try. Indeed, 2 participants stressed that it has severe side effects, while 3 stated that it can make you go blind; in one of these cases, it was a participant’s friend who was unable to see for nearly a week after taking the plant. It was also thought to cause permanent psychological damage by 4 participants. One individual stated it is bad for short-term memory and thus causes confusion, while another stated it is soothing to the body and slows the heart, and another that it has effects on the autonomic system. One called it a strong psychedelic and 4 others stated it was hallucinogenic, with one of them specifying the seeds as the hallucinogenic part and one stating that the hallucinations are very real and difficult to discern from reality. An additional participant stated that it can cause you to lose touch with reality. One stated that it is psychoactive, 2 that it is a deliriant, and one that it was either a deliriant or dissociative. One stated it has no spiritual use as a result of its effects, while another felt it would be easy to get the seeds on the internet. 2 individuals commented on the legality, both believing it to not be illegal in Slovenia. One noted that it has a close relative in South America that is sometimes added to ayahuasca.
37 of the participants knew of uses for this plant, with by far the most frequently listed being recreational use, stated by 34 participants. All parts of the plant were implicated in all possible manners of preparation for this use, but the most often mentioned method of doing this was by eating the seeds, as stated by 10 of these 34 participants. Among those to list the recreational usage of this plant, one said that it is used as a stimulant and one said that it is used by drug users to help with their withdrawal symptoms. The next most commonly listed uses involved medicinal applications, listed by 12 people. 3 of them stressed its use as an anaesthetic, though 2 of them noted that this is not a modern use, with one stating that pure scopolamine is now used. Listed each once were its use against coughs, nausea, bronchitis, diarrhoea, and in ophthalmology to dilate pupils. One participant also listed it as a soothing medicine while 2 noted it could be used to make a medicinal tea. One knew only that it was medicinal, while one participant specifically claimed the plant has no medicinal applications. Each listed 5 times were this plant’s use as a garden ornamental and its use in European witchcraft; among the latter, one participant elaborated that the root used to be used to make ointments that witches would apply to their vaginas with broom handles. 2 individuals stated that a tea of the plant’s seeds can induce vivid dreams, with one also stating it aids sleep. One said it is a component of "evil breath", a powder they say is used in Colombia to drug people with, while one said that when one hallucinates on this plant it will help them find other hallucinogenic plants; indeed, a further individual stressed that its traditional use was for divination. One participant said that this plant is ritually used elsewhere in the world, and another stated that it was used in the wine of ancient Greece. One person interviewed had once heard from an old woman that this plant used to be used by mothers in Slovenia to make their babies quiet, and another had heard that when planted near a vegetable garden it will keep small animals away. One knew that the plant had uses, but could not recall what they were.
Of the participants, 20 knew someone who had used this plant before. The stories invariably involved terrible trips with long-lasting effects. One person even said they had a friend who continued having hallucinations for 2 weeks after using the plant. One person had a friend who had sold the seeds before. Also mentioned were knowing someone who drowned after taking it and knowing someone who took it and then woke up naked in a ditch in the neighbouring country of Hungary. 2 people mentioned that their friends had permanent damage done by this plant, one stating that it triggered psychosis and one that their friend who took it has never been quite right since.
31 of the participants claimed to have some knowledge of
For participants who knew of this plant, university classes were the most frequent way of first being introduced to it, being listed by 5 individuals, one specifying botany classes and one specifying pharmacognosy classes. The internet was listed by 4 individuals while books were listed by 3.
In terms of what they knew about this plant, 2 individuals stated that it is in the nightshade family. One said that hyoscyamine is named after this plant, while 2 mentioned that it contains scopolamine. Each mentioned once were that it causes terrible trips, that it is poisonous and hallucinogenic, that it is psychoactive, that it is a deliriant, and that it contains alkaloids. One individual also described the plant as having a gentle yet masculine spirit.
When listing the ways in which this plant is used, the most commonly stated was that it used to be used in European witchcraft; 5 individuals stated this, with one specifying that witches would make an ointment of the root that they would apply to their vaginas with a broom handle. One said that the plant used to be used in ointments in Slovenia. 3 individuals stated it to be medicinal, with one specifying that it works as an anaesthetic. 3 participants said it can be used as a recreational substance, with one specifying it works as a hallucinogen. One of these participants said the leaves of the plant can be made into an ointment with
Among the participants to know of this plant, only one knew someone who has actually used it. This participant is also the one who had previously used it themself. One participant noted that though they do not personally know anyone who took this plant, they did watch a documentary in which 2 individuals take it.
8 participants claimed to know about the appearance or habitat of
For how they had first heard of this plant, 2 participants stated they heard about it through university classes, with one specifying that it was due to botany classes. One first heard about it through books, and one first heard about it from an acquaintance.
2 participants commented on this plant’s family affiliation, one noting it falls in the nightshade family and one noting it is a member of the Solanaceae. 5 individuals stated that this plant is chemically similar to
In terms of uses for this plant, 2 individuals noted that the rhizome used to be used by witches to make an ointment that they applied to their vaginas to help them fly. One stated that it is used in modern pharmaceuticals, and one that it used to be used as a medicine. One said that the leaves are tied around the waist of people in order to protect them from evil spirits.
Only one individual knew of others who had taken this plant, and they stated they know of a couple of cases of people taking it and then ending up in psychiatric hospitals for a while.
7 participants claimed to know what this plant looks like or how it grows. 2 commented on the flowers, one saying they are like those of
In terms of the number of plants participants were able to identify by name, there was a fair degree of similarity between knowing 1, 2, or 3 plants, but with a large drop in numbers for those claiming to know all 4 of the plants, with less than 8% of the study group stating they recognised all of the plants under investigation (meanwhile, about 3 times as many people were unable to identify any of the plants). Those who tended to have the most detailed knowledge about these plants and to recognise the largest number by name were those who had undertaken university level studies and had courses in botany or pharmacognosy where they had learned of these plants, suggesting that "traditional" knowledge has been greatly eroded and largely replaced with academic learning when it comes to these plants. Indeed, a small number of people were even able to name the family in which these plants are classified and a fair few were able to comment to varying degrees of specificity on the alkaloids that they are best known for. This not only displays a shift from "traditional" to "modern" knowledge acquisition, but also highlights the shifting nature of the knowledge itself from applied to academic; where once use knowledge and skills would have prevailed, factual knowledge divorced from practicality has largely come to take its place. One of the few facts to be passed down "traditionally" through generations about these plants were their toxicity rather than their wealth of uses. Indeed, the spread of Western medicine and the globalised movement of recreational drugs has made many of the uses of these plants essentially obsolete, especially given their potentially dangerous side effects.
Even between the plants there were clear differences in how individuals had learned about them.
The most recognised as a recreational substance was
Knowledge was not infallible in this study; many individuals described plants that were quite obviously not those being researched. 6 people described
During interviews, it became apparent that at least 9 individuals to recognise
In addition to obvious issues of identification, a great deal of non- or pseudo-factual information was stated as fact. For example, many participants mentioned that these plants were once used as ointments applied to the vaginas of European witches with brooms. Though this is indeed a widely held belief, it is not actually proven that such ointments were used, and even less proven that they were used by being introduced into the vagina [
One participant mentioned that
It is also worth noting that in many cases participants may have failed to provide information, thinking that their other responses implied it. For example, more individuals stated that these plants can be used as recreational substances than that they are psychoactive. Whether this reflects an assumption that stating a plant can be used recreationally means it is psychoactive or that the individuals were unfamiliar with the concept of psychoactivity is unclear.
Though ethnobotanical fieldwork has historically been based upon field interviews, participants in the present research were given the option to be interviewed in person or to complete an online questionnaire. Just as "traditional" knowledge evolves, so too do societal norms, and research methods must also grow to keep pace. As in-person interviews and field work were not necessary for this type of research, it allowed a greater number of individuals to participate, many of whom would not have elected to do so in a face-to-face interview for reasons of privacy or convenience. This impersonal form of data gathering may also have served to lessen social desirability bias in responses, though also limited the interviews to a very structured format. Overall, approximately 60% of participants elected to fill out a questionnaire rather than participating in a live interview.
The mentioning of Erowid (a harm-reduction web resource that also offers an index of pertinent web forums) also brings up the question of how knowledge is transmitted through the internet. With web forums such as Reddit being very popular, it further raises the issue of when knowledge is "traditional" or not. In using web forums, individuals are not merely reading about information written by a source, but actively interacting with another individual. This essentially mirrors the intergenerational passage of knowledge within families. Yet most would not consider knowledge gained through a web forum to be "traditional". If a person’s grandmother were to teach them about traditional uses of plants through such a medium, would it be more or less traditional than getting the information from another person? We all have our own traditions, and the notion of "traditional" knowledge needs further investigation and consideration within the field of ethnobotany, especially as it applies to the modern spread of knowledge through resources that were unavailable (and, indeed, unimaginable) to previous generations.
Overall, knowledge of these plants was very lacking among users of hallucinogenic plants and mushrooms in Slovenia, showing that the "traditional" use of these plants as recreational substances has declined. Each plant was unique:
Though the knowledge of the uses of these anticholinergic Solanaceae plants is clearly not very detailed among hallucinogenic plant and mushroom users in Slovenia, some does exist, largely arising from education and use of the internet rather than oral legacies passed through families. Though largely dangerous when used as recreational substances, some tradition and knowledge surrounding these plants has been passed down. Indeed, increased education about these plants and their traditional uses may be valuable, if for no other reason than to ensure youths are aware of the dangers these plants pose.