Human lung epithelial BEAS-2B cells exhibit characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells

BEAS-2B was originally established as an immortalized but non-tumorigenic epithelial cell line from human bronchial epithelium. Because of general recognition for its bronchial epithelial origin, the BEAS-2B cell line has been widely used as an in vitro cell model in a large variety of studies associated with respiratory diseases including lung carcinogenesis. However, very few studies have discussed non-epithelial features of BEAS-2B cells, especially the features associated with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which represent a group of fibroblast-like cells with limited self-renewal and differentiation potential to various cell lineages. In this study, we compared BEAS-2B with a human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hMSCs) cell line, hMSC1, which served as a representative of hMSCs in terms of expressing common features of hMSCs. It was observed that both BEAS-2B and hMSC1 shared the same expression profile of surface markers of hMSCs and exhibited similar osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential. In addition, like hMSC1, the BEAS-2B cell line exhibited suppressive activities on proliferation of mitogen-activated total T lymphocytes as well as Th1 lymphocytes, and IFNγ-induced expression of IDO1, all thus demonstrating that BEAS-2B cells exhibited an almost identical characteristic profile with hMSCs, even though, there was a clear difference between BEAS-2B and hMSCs in the effects on type 2 macrophage polarization. Most importantly, the hMSCs features of BEAS-2B were unlikely a consequence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Therefore, this study provided a set of evidence to provoke reconsideration of epithelial origin of BEAS-2B.


The nude mice tumorigenicity assay
Nude mice were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC) (Beijing, China). Each of 3-or 4-week old female BALB/c nude mice was injected with 2×10 6 cells subcutaneously in the middle of dorsum of upper limb. The mice were examined for tumor growth twice a week after inoculation for at least three months. The animal use protocols for this assay were approved by the NIFDC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

The flow cytometry assay for detecting cell surface markers
BD Stemflow hMSC Analysis Kit was employed to detect expression of cell surface markers using FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) following the procedures reported in a previous study [26]. The data was collected and analyzed by FCS Express V3 software.

Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis
Genomic DNA of BEAS-2B was extracted by using Dnaeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen), and then amplified by direct PCR for examining the expression of 9 STR loci, i.e. the loci of Amelogenin, CSF1PO, D13S317, D16S539, D5S818, D7S820, THO1, TPOX, vWA. The PCR products were separated and detected via capillary electrophoresis using ABI Prism 3130 followed by data analysis with GeneMarker software. The profile of PCR products was then used to validate cell identity and determine existence of cross-contamination between different cell lines.

Western blotting analysis
The procedures for conventional Western blotting were followed to monitor changes in expression of relevant proteins in different cell lines with or without treatments. Briefly, cell lysates were prepared using RIPA buffer containing proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), separated in 8-12% PAGE gel and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. The signals were detected using ECL Advance Western Blotting Detection Kit (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ).

Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation
The abilities of hMSC1 or BEAS-2B to differentiate into adipocytes and osteocytes were tested by using STEMPRO Differentiation Kit following the procedures described in a previous report [26]. Briefly, the cells growing in approximately 80% confluence were incubated at 37˚C, 5% CO 2 in each well of a 24-well cell culture plate with each differentiation induction medium for 21 days, then fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 30 min and stained with 0.3% Oil Red O solution for 50 min for testing adipogenesis or with 2% Alizarin Red S solution for 5 min for testing osteogenesis. After thorough washing with water, the images from each staining were taken under a light microscope. In each differentiation assay, the cells growing in each regular complete medium were used as the negative control.

Inhibition of Th1 lymphocyte proliferation by hMSC1 or BEAS-2B cells
Fresh PBMCs were co-cultured with hMSC1 or BEAS-2B cells at 1:5 ratio in RPMI 1640 complete medium for 18 hours and then stimulated with 25 ng/mL PMA, 1 μg/mL Ionomycin, and 10 μg/mL Brefeldin A together for another 5 h. Then, the CD3 + CD8 − IFN-γ + cells were gated using BD-Calibur flow cytometer with relevant antibodies to determine the amount of Th1 lymphocytes [27]. The data was analyzed by FCS Express V3 software.

CFSE staining-based lymphocyte proliferation assay
For testing lymphocyte proliferation, the procedures reported in a previous study were followed [26]. Briefly, 1×10 6 PBMCs isolated freshly using Ficoll solution and suspended in 1 ml PBS containing 5% FBS were incubated with 5 μM CFSE at room temperature for 5 min. After thorough washing with PBS containing 5% FBS, the CFSE-labeled PBMCs were then co-cultured with BEAS-2B cells or hMSC1 in 5:1 ratio for 7 days at 37˚C and 5% CO 2 in each well of a 12-well cell culture plate in RPMI-1640 complete medium containing 10 μg/ml PHA. After incubation, all lymphocytes were collected and the inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation was determined by gradual reduction of CFSE signal over the incubation period as detected by BD-Calibur flow cytometer. The data was further analyzed by FCS Express V3 software.

Induction of type 2 macrophage polarization
Fresh PBMCs were used for isolating CD14 + monocytes, which were sorted by anti-CD14 MicroBeads (Miltenyi). The CD14 + monocytes with over 90% purity were plated in 6-well cell culture plates with 0.5-1×10 6 cells per well, and co-incubated with 2×10 5 hMSC1 or BEAS-2B cells for 3-4 days. After staining with FITC-conjugated CD14 and APC-conjugated CD206, the macrophages were then tested for the expression of CD206 by flow cytometry. The data was collected and analyzed with FCS Express V3 software.

Quantitative RT-PCR
The quantitative RT-PCR was employed to detect mRNA expression of Slug and Snail in BEAS-2B cells after treatment with RepSox or TGF-β1 [28]. Briefly, 1 μg of total RNA isolated by Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) from the cells were reverse-transcribed by using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). The qRT-PCR assay was performed by using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II kit (Takara, Dalian, China) and the LightCycler 96 Real-time PCR system (Roche). The levels of Slug and Snail mRNAs were normalized to the level of GAPDH mRNA. The primers used for examining the expression of Slug, Snail and GAPDH were used: Slug, CCAAACTACAGCGAACTGGA and GTGGTATGACAGGCATGGAG; Snail, CTCTTTCCTCG TCAGGAAGC and GGCTGCTGGAAGGTAAACTC; GAPDH, GGTCTCCTCTGACTTCAACA and GTGAGGGTCTCTCTCTTCCT.

Statistical analysis
The data collected from flow cytometry were expressed as means±SEM of at least three separate experiments. The comparison between group means was assessed using one-way analysis of variance with Newman-Keuls posttest in GraphPad Prism 6 Software (San Diego, CA). The difference with p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

BEAS-2B was validated as an immortalized non-tumorigenic human cell line expressing SV40 Large T antigen
The BEAS-2B cell line was established originally via immortalization of human bronchial cells using adenovirus12-SV40 hybrid virus [1]. In the original report, after characterizing the expression of SV40 Large T antigen (SV40-LT) and CK8 and CK18, both of which were assumed to be the epithelial proteins, the cell line was then accepted as a non-tumorigenic lung epithelial cell line. However, our characterizations revealed the BEAS-2B cells exhibiting characteristics of both epithelial and mesenchymal cells in both cell morphology and expression of marker proteins (Figs 1 and 3). In our characterizations, two mesenchymal cell lines, hMSC1 and WI-38, and two lung epithelial cancer cell lines, NCI-H1703 and A549, were included. Consistent to the original report, BEAS-2B was validated as a SV40-LT expressing cell line without tumorigenicity when inoculated in nude mice (Fig 1B and 1C).
However, in the test of marker proteins, it was found in Western blotting that the BEAS-2B cells were positive for CK8 and CK18 expression, but negative for α-SMA, collagen I and fibronectin, which are three proteins abundantly expressed in hMSCs. In comparison, the A549 cells were also positive for CK8 and CK18 while NCI-H1703 cells were negative for these two proteins. In addition, while the WI-38 cells were negative for CK8 and CK18, moderately positive for α-SMA but slightly positive for collagen I and fibronectin, the hMSC1 cells were positive for all marker proteins ( Fig 1B). In addition, we also detected the expression of Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) in BEAS-2B and A549 cells with the positivies being 35.38% and 51.12%, respectively. However, the EpCAM expression was hardly detectable in NCI-H1703, hMSC1 and WI-38 cells ( Fig 1D). Putting all together, the new characterizations validated the original findings that BEAS-2B represented a non-tumorigenic cell line expressing SV40-LT, CK8, CK18, and EpCAM as well. However, it failed to support a conclusion that BEAS-2B was absolutely of epithelial origin as the expression of CK8, CK18 and even EpCAM were found in both epithelial and mesenchymal cells.

The BEAS-2B cell line used in our studies shared an identical genetic fingerprint with the same cell line deposited in ATCC
To assure the BEAS-2B cell line used in our studies was identical with or originated from the same cell line deposited in American Tissue Collection Center (ATCC), we employed a short tandem repeat (STR) assay to examine genetic fingerprint of BEAS-2B using a 9-loci STR panel covering the loci of Amelogenin, CSF1PO, D13S317, D16S539, D5S818, D7S820, THO1, TPOX, and vWA (Fig 2), the same loci also employed by ATCC when reporting the identity of the same cell line. Through an online STR matching analysis using DSMZ profile database from www.dsmz.de/fp/cgi-bin/str.html, an evaluation value (EV) of 97% was obtained from the comparison between the BEAS-2B line deposited in ATCC and the line of ours ( Table 1).
As the two cell lines can be considered identical if the EV greater than 90%, we thus confirmed the BEAS-2B cell line used in our studies was identical to the cell line deposited in ATCC.

The BEAS-2B cell line shared an identical profile in cell surface markers with hMSCs
The BEAS-2B cell line has been frequently used as an in vitro non-tumorigenic lung epithelial model in a large variety of studies associated mostly with lung carcinogenesis with a few of them using it in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) studies [9]. However, no attempts in all the studies, even in EMT studies, have been made to further characterize the cell line for expressing the definitive mesenchymal surface markers. In this study, a group of positive and negative surface markers commonly used to define hMSCs was utilized to characterize BEAS-2B cells. It was then observed via flow cytometry assay that the BEAS-2B cell line shared an identical surface marker profile with hMSCs as both BEAS-2B and hMSC1 expressed positive surface markers CD44, CD73, CD90 and CD105 with over 99% positivity, but almost did not express negative surface markers CD11b, CD19, CD34, CD45 and HLA-DR with less than 1% positivity (Fig 3). Meanwhile, we examined these surface markers on both A549 and NCI-H1703 cells as well. It was found that the two epithelial cell lines almost did not express CD11b, CD19, CD34, CD45 and HLA-DR as well. However, even though over 95% of the A549 cells expressed CD44 and CD73, but less than 50% of the cells were positive for CD90 and less than 2% positive for CD105 (Fig 3). In NCI-H1703 cells, the expression for CD90, CD73, CD105 and CD44 were 99.75%, 88.71%, 13.46%, and 0.3%, respectively (Fig 3). Since all the surface markers chosen in this test were often used together to define mesenchymal stem cells, it was then strongly suggested that the surface marker profile of BEAS-2B appeared more like mesenchymal stem cells rather than epithelial cells.

The BEAS-2B cells shared a similar potential with hMSCs on both osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation
Encouraged by the findings of expressing a full profile of surface markers of hMSCs, we then speculated that the BEAS-2B cells might also exhibit similarities with hMSCs on differentiation potentials and immunomodulatory activities. Next, we examined the in vitro ability of BEAS-2B cells to differentiate into osteocytes and adipocytes in comparison with hMSC1. The results showed that, similar to hMSC1, BEAS-2B exhibited a strong capability of differentiating into osteocytes and adipocytes after each differentiation induction (Fig 4A). In the meantime, we also examined the differentiation activities of both A549 and NCI-H1703 cells. It was found that, after differentiation induction, whereas the A549 cells exhibited a scarce differentiation potential for both adipocytes and osteocytes, the NCI-H1703 cells were resistant to both osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation as the cells died when exposing to the differentiation   medium for longer than three days (Fig 4B). It was then suggested again that the BEAS-2B cells behaved more like hMSCs rather than lung epithelial cells.

The BEAS-2B cells shared the same immunomodulatory properties with hMSCs on inhibiting proliferation of both total T lymphocytes and Th1 subpopulation
After testing the differentiation potential, we next examined the possible immunomodulatory activities of BEAS-2B cells in comparison with hMSC1. In the new experiments, the BEAS-2B cells were co-cultured with the PHA-activated PBMCs, then, either total T lymphocytes measured via a CFSE-based staining or the Th1 subgroup of CD4 + T lymphocytes represented by CD3 + CD8 -IFNγ + lymphocytes were examined. Interestingly, we found that the BEAS-2B cells exerted a similarly significant inhibition on proliferation of both total T lymphocytes and Th1 lymphocytes (Fig 5A, 5B and 5C). Meanwhile, we also performed the co-culturing experiments to test the proliferation of Th1 lymphocytes for both A549 and NCI-H1703 cells. It was found that the A549 cells exhibited a much lower inhibitory effect on Th1 than both BEAS-2B and hMSC1, while the NCI-H1703 cells showed almost no such inhibitory effect (Fig 5B and  5C).
Since the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) protein was believed to play a key role after activation by IFNγ or by other proinflammatory molecules in mediating immunomodulation by hMSCs, we next examined the IFNγ-induced IDO1 expression via Western blotting in BEAS-2B, A549 and NCI-H1703 cells in comparison with hMSC1. It was observed that both BEAS-2B and hMSC1 produced a tremendous amount of IDO1 after IFNγ induction, whereas the A549 cells produced a much lower amount, and the NCI-H1703 cells showed no detectable amount, of IDO1 expression (Fig 5D). Thus, the findings from the immunomodulation testing and IDO1 tests demonstrated that the BEAS-2B cells behaved again more like hMSCs than epithelial cells.

BEAS-2B did not exhibit promoting effect on M2 macrophage polarization
After demonstrating the shared activities by BEAS-2B and hMSC1 on T lymphocytes, we next conducted a separate co-culturing experiment to reveal the possible activity of BEAS-2B in modulating macrophage polarization/differentiation. We first isolated human CD14 + monocytes from fresh PBMCs and then co-cultured the monocytes with BEAS-2B cells or hMSC1. At the end of the co-culturing, we examined the changes in expression of CD206, a common surface marker of all types of M2 macrophages, in CD14 + cells [29]. It was shown that hMSC1 induced a dramatic increase in the proportion of CD14 + /CD206 + M2 macrophages; whereas BEAS-2B cells did not show such an effect (Fig 6A and 6B). In the meantime, we also conducted the same assay for both A549 cells and NCI-H1703 cells. The new findings showed that, like BEAS-2B cells, NCI-H1703 did not promote M2 macrophage polarization, while A549 showed a moderate capability of inducing M2 polarization (Fig 6A and 6B).
Given the original report as well as our validated finding that BEAS-2B was positive for SV40 LT antigen (Fig 1B), we then attempted to interpret that the failed inhibition of BEAS-2B on M2 macrophage polarization could be attributable to the expression of SV40 Large T antigen. To test this hypothesis, we performed a lentivirus-mediated transfection on hMSC1 to derive new hMSC1-SV40LT cells stably expressing SV40 LT antigen (Fig 6C), and then examined the effect of hMSC1-SV40LT cells on M2 macrophage polarization in comparison with hMSC1-Control transfected with empty vector. As a result, the hMSC1-SV40LT cells became almost incapable of promoting M2 polarization (Fig 6D and 6E), thus supporting the hypothesis that the incapability of BEAS-2B on M2 macrophage polarization was a consequence of the expression of SV40 LT antigen.

The mesenchymal properties of BEAS-2B cells was not likely a consequence of EMT
Given the similarities shared by BEAS-2B and hMSC1 in surface marker profile, differentiation potential, and immunomodulatory activities, it was thus concluded that the BEAS-2B cells exhibited an almost identical profile of hMSCs. However, it was unclear whether the exhibited properties were originally possessed before cell line derivation or acquired during long in vitro cell culturing/passaging. Considering that BEAS-2B has served as an extremely popular cell line in various in vitro studies, it was not impossible that the mesenchymal properties of the cells could be acquired via the mechanism of EMT during long in vitro culturing even its origin was of epithelial nature. If the EMT happened to be the case, it could be most likely induced by TGF-β1, which exists in fetal bovine serum in most in vitro cell culture system, as the TGF-β1 signaling represents the most well-known inducer of EMT [30]. Next, we attempted to determine whether the EMT could be the contributing mechanism to the acquisition of mesenchymal properties of BEAS-2B by consecutively treating the cells with either TGF-β1 or RepSox, a selective TGF-β1 signaling inhibitor, before analyzing the cells for the mesenchymal properties. Unexpectedly, after consecutive treatment for 5 days with 2-20 nM RepSox, a dosage range reported previously of being able to inhibit TGF-β1 signaling activity and subsequent inhibition of EMT [31], the expression of CK8 and fibronectin, a epithelial marker and a common matrix protein of fibroblasts, respectively, was significantly reduced, whereas the expression of mesenchymal marker vimentin was elevated, and all these changes were clearly in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 7A). The RepSox treatment also induced an elevation in E-Cadherin, but this effect was not dose-dependent. In the meantime, the RepSox treatment did not cause significant changes in expression of epithelial marker CK18 as well as Twist, Slug, and Snail, which are the three key transcriptional factors involved in TGF-β signaling and EMT, as detected by Western blotting (Fig 7A) or quantitative RT-PCR (Fig 7D). Most importantly, RepSox did not induce any change on CD73, CD44, CD90, CD105, the key hMSCs surface markers (Fig 7B).
In a parallel experiment, the treatment with 2-20ng/ml TGF-β1 did not induce any change in the expression of CK8, CK18, and vimentin, but showed a significant increase in fibronectin and a reduction in E-cadherin (Fig 7C). Although the expression of both Slug and Snail, as detected by quantitative RT-PCR, was elevated, the expression of Twist, as examined by Western blotting, was dramatically reduced in a dose-dependent manner after the TGF-β1 treatment (Fig 7C and 7E). Similar to the RepSox treatment, no changes were observed in CD73, CD44, CD90, CD105 following the treatment with TGF-β1 ( Fig 7B). Thus, all the observations did not support the speculation that the mesenchymal properties of BEAS-2B were acquired through the mechanism of EMT.

Discussion
Epithelial cells and mesenchymal cells are two cell types in terms of cell biology properties developed along embryonic differentiation. Both cell types co-exist in almost all types of tissues including epithelial tissues. There is always technical difficulty to separate epithelial cells from mesenchymal cells during isolation and establishment of primary epithelial cells. Therefore, without extensive characterization, a newly established cell line could be easily wrongly recognized for its cell type identity. Based on the present observations, the BEAS-2B cell line may represent such an example of wrong recognition.
The BEAS-2B cell line was originally established as a human non-tumorigenic lung epithelial cell line derived from a human lung tissue and has been extensively used as an in vitro nontumorigenic lung epithelial model in a large variety of studies in association with lung carcinogenesis for over 30 years. However, very few studies have challenged its non-epithelial properties since the cell line was originally accepted as an epithelial cell line following the initial evidence to support the epithelial origin. In the present study, we have extended characterization for this cell line to pursue its mesenchymal properties. After a comprehensive comparison with hMSCs in both phenotypes and biological functions, we demonstrated for the first time that BEAS-2B cells exhibited an almost identical profile of hMSCs. It was further believed that the mesenchymal features of BEAS-2B are of intrinsic nature rather than acquired through the process like EMT during long in vitro exposure to TGFβ1-containing cell culture system.
At the beginning, our new investigations for mesenchymal properties of BEAS-2B were encouraged by an unintentional finding that BEAS-2B expressed a group of definitive surface markers of hMSCs, which was proposed by ISCT in 2006 as part of a minimal criteria for defining hMSCs of different tissue origins [16]. The BEAS-2B cell line used in our experiments has been validated as a non-tumorigenic and SV40-LT expressing cell line with an identical fingerprint to the same cell line deposited in the ATCC.

BEAS-2B cells resemble human mesenchymal stem cells
From the characterization of marker proteins of both mesenchymal cells and epithelial cells, BEAS-2B was found to be identical to hMSC1 in the profile of all surface marker proteins used to define hMSCs. Meanwhile, the surface marker profiles of NCI-H1703 and A549 cells were largely different from both BEAS-2B and hMSC1, particularly different in CD105 (Fig 3). In addition to the surface markers, the BEAS-2B cells also expressed CK8 and CK18, which were assumed to be epithelial marker proteins in original report [9], but did not express α-SMA, fibronectin and collagen I, which are the proteins abundant in mesenchymal cells [32]. However, it was found in our studies that CK8 and CK18 were not unique to epithelial cells as hMSC1 also expressed these two proteins ( Fig 1B) and several other hMSCs cell lines from different donors in our studies expressed CK8 and CK18 as well (S1 Fig). A similar situation was also seen in the expression of EpCAM, which was found positive in BEAS-2B and A549 cells, but negative in NCI-H1703 cells (Fig 1D). In addition, the undetectable expression of α-SMA, fibronectin and collagen I in BEAS-2B was not likely to exclude the possibility of its mesenchymal features because BEAS-2B was established from the transformation by SV40-LT, which was found from our limited observations to be able to suppress the expression of α-SMA, fibronectin and collagen I proteins in hMSCs cells including hMSC1 (S2 Fig). Nevertheless, the identical profile to the MSCs surface markers strongly supports the possession of mesenchymal features of BEAS-2B.
From the characterization on multi-lineage differentiation potential, BEAS-2B and hMSC1 were found to share an almost identical potential in both osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, whereas A549 exhibited a substantial potential for adipogenesis, but much lower potential for osteogenesis, whereas the NCI-H1703 cells possessed almost no potential for both of them (Fig 4). The difference existing between A549 and NCI-H1703 may be interpreted by the difference in malignancy; low malignant epithelial cells, like NCI-H1703, possess no or very low differentiation potential, and high malignant epithelial cells, such as A549, behave more like cancer stem cells thus exhibiting certain level of differentiation potential. Since A549 was not a de novo MSCs line, its differentiation potential is believed to be acquired during its malignant progression. But even though, the differentiation potential of A549 should be much lower than that of hMSC1. Nevertheless, the findings on the equivalence in differentiation potential between BEAS-2B and hMSC1 add a separate piece of evidence to support the possession of mesenchymal stem cell features by BEAS-2B.
From the characterization on immunomodulatory activities, the BEAS-2B cells also exhibited an almost identical immunomodulation profile with hMSC1. In comparison, the immunomodulation profile for A549 and NCI-H1703 was much different from both BEAS-2B and hMSC1. Whereas the A549 cells exhibited a much lower capability of inhibiting the activated lymphocytes and a much lower production of the IFNγ-induced IDO1 than both BEAS-2B and hMSC1, the NCI-H1703 cells showed an even lower ability than A549 to suppress the activated lymphocyte proliferation and no expression of the IFNγ-induced IDO1. Following the same logic, the difference in immunomodulation profile between A549 and NCI-H1703 could also be interpreted by the difference in malignancy between the two cancer lines, in which A549 represented a more malignant cells having acquired a certain level of immunomodulation, which further contributed to the increased malignancy of the cells, while the NCI-H1703 cells had not progressed sufficiently to acquire the capability of immunomodulation.
In summary, with the new evidence showing almost identical profiles in surface markers, differentiation potential and immunomodulation between hMSC1 and BEAS-2B, it is thus believed that the BEAS-2B cells should be accepted as a bona fide mesenchymal stem cells.
While considering the possibility of intrinsically possessed mesenchymal features by BEAS-2B, it needs to exclude the possibility that the mesenchymal features of BEAS-2B could be acquired during long in vitro exposure to the factors that promote EMT as the EMT has been well accepted as a common mechanism for epithelial cells to acquire mesenchymal features [33,34]. TGFβ1 represents a well-characterized EMT inducer and exists in FBS in large amount. As the BEAS-2B has served as a very common in vitro cell model used frequently in various in vitro studies and the medium for growing BEAS-2B has long been changed from serum-free medium to FBS-containing medium, it is thus necessary to exclude the possibility that the mesenchymal features of BEAS-2B could be acquired after long in vitro exposure to TGFβ1-containing FBS via the process of EMT [30]. Indeed, the new results from the experiments using TGFβ1 or RepSox, did not fully support the possibility of EMT, as both the supporting and non-supporting evidence to the mechanism of EMT were seen. Most importantly, the treatment with either RepSox or TGF-β1 did not induce any changes in expression of CD73, CD44, CD90, and CD105, the definitive hMSCs surface markers. These findings thus excluded the EMT mechanism, meanwhile, further supported that BEAS-2B was of intrinsic rather than acquired mesenchymal features. The possible wrong recognition of BEAS-2B as an epithelial cell line could be very likely an outcome of incomplete characterization at the time of cell line establishment and no further characterization thereafter.
If the BEAS-2B is eventually validated as an essential hMSC cell line, it would be necessary to review the designs and results derived from a large amount of studies reported previously using BEAS-2B as an in vitro cell model, and all the findings based on the assumption of epithelial essence of BEAS-2B should be re-directed to the findings associated with hMSCs features. From the points of MSCs, the newly revealed mesenchymal features of BEAS-2B may be of great importance in the field of hMSCs studies.
MSCs has emerged as the most frequent type of stem cells used in both preclinical and clinical stages of stem cell therapies [35,36]. However, the quality evaluation of hMSCs still remains to be a big challenge mainly because of the lack of stable hMSCs reference cell line [37]. Various quality factors within the quality evaluation testing, such as the quality of PBMCs used for evaluating immunomodulatory activities of hMSCs, the quality of testing reagents and testing medium, may affect quality evaluation of hMSCs products [37]. Therefore, to eliminate the interferences from various factors, it is extremely important to establish a reference cell line. BEAS-2B may represent such a reference cell line.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated for the first time that BEAS-2B cells line may represent a bona fide hMSCs cell line rather than epithelial cell line. Further validation tests are warranted for clarifying its intrinsic mesenchymal identity as well as for reinterpreting previous findings achieved from using BEAS-2B as an in vitro epithelial model. Meanwhile, the mesenchymal properties may give BEAS-2B a unique advantage over primary hMSCs for being a valuable hMSCs cell line in the field of quality control studies of hMSCs.