Correction: Prooxidative Potential of Photo-Irradiated Aqueous Extracts of Grape Pomace, a Recyclable Resource from Winemaking Process

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158197.].


Introduction
Grape is the largest fruit crop in the world. The annual production worldwide amounts to almost 70 million tons and around 80% is used to make wine [1], indicating that waste materials or byproducts obtained from winemaking process could be a valuable resource to be recycled. The waste from winemaking process can be divided into three categories, i.e., pomace, clarification sediment such as lees, and yeast sediment. Regarding grape pomace, for instance, it was reported that over 16 million tons of byproducts were produced [2]. As one sphere of beneficial use of waste materials or byproducts obtained from winemaking process, a recent study showed that grape pomace appeared to have the great potential as source of natural antioxidant and antimicrobial agents [3].
Our previous study revealed that photo-irradiation of the aqueous extract from grape pomace obtained from a winemaking process exerted bactericidal effect on Staphylococcus aureus due to highly reactive hydroxyl radial (•OH) formation [4]. The grape pomace obtained from a winemaking process could be a substantial resource of polyphenolic compounds [5]. Since it has been reported that some polyphenolic compounds such as gallic acid, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and proanthocyanidin exerts bactericidal activity upon photo-irradiation [6][7][8], it is speculated that polyphenolic compounds in the aqueous extract from grape pomace would be responsible for the bactericidal activity upon photo-irradiation.
The purpose of the present study was to assess the chemical composition in the aqueous extracts of grape pomace by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS). In addition, prooxidative profile and potential indicated by •OH generation induced by photo-irradiation were compared to those of commercially available grape seed extract as an authentic polyphenol product and (+)-catechin as a pure polyphenolic compound.

Materials and Methods Reagent
Reagents were purchased from the following sources: 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) from Labotec (Tokyo, Japan); catalase (from bovine liver) from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan); 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine N-oxyl (TEMPOL) from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), (+)-catechin from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). GSE (Leucoselect 1 ) was obtained from Indena (Milan, Italy). According to the manufacture, Leucoselect 1 is a grape seed extract with a well-defined chemical composition such as catechinmonomers and -oligomers, which was completely elucidated by instrumental analyses such as high performance LC-MS. This was also confirmed in a previous study in which Leucoselect 1 was subjected to a LC-MS analysis showing that the calculated concentrations of (+)-catechin and (-)-epicatechin were 12.1% (wt/wt) and 6.6% (wt/wt), respectively [9]. All other reagents used were of analytical grade. membrane filtration (φ0.22 μm) the supernatant was subjected to total polyphenol determination by Folin-Denis method in which gallic acid was used as a standard [10]. The aqueous extract solution (hereafter termed as GPE for grape pomace extract) was stored at -20°C until assayed. In use, GPE was adjusted to contain designated concentrations of total polyphenol with pure water.

Light source
According to our previous studies [4,6], an experimental device equipped with a light emitting diode with a wavelength of 400 nm (NHH105UV, Lustrous Technology, Shiji, Taiwan) was used. The output power of the LED measured using a power meter (FieldMate, Coherent, Santa Clara, CA) was set to be 400 mW per LED corresponding to an irradiance of 130 mW/ cm 2 at a distance of 15 mm from the LED. A four-clear-sided methacrylate plastic cuvette containing the sample was placed in the experimental device. LED-light irradiation was performed toward both sides of the plastic cuvette (total irradiance: 260 mW/cm 2 ).

LC-ESI-MS analysis for chemical composition of GPE
For LC-ESI-MS analysis, since water soluble fraction was not suitable for MS analysis because of apprehensiveness of contamination in the ionization chamber, a direct analysis of GPE could not be carried out. Instead, 100 ml of GPE was concentrated to dryness in vacuo, and extracted twice with 10 ml of methanol (MeOH) followed by centrifugation at 9, 000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was further concentrated to dryness in vacuo, and the resultant dried residue was dissolved in MeOH to be 100 mg/ml followed by passage through a filter (polyvinylidene difluoride; pore size, 0.2 μm). The resultant sample was injected into the electrospray ion source of a QSTAR Elite ESI quadruple time-of-flight mass spectrometer (AB Sciex; Framingham, MA, USA) coupled to Agilent 1200 series (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation was undertaken on an Inertsil ODS-4 (3.0 × 250 mm, GL Sciences, Tokyo, Japan) at 40°C. With regard to gradient elution, solvent A was water with 2 mM ammonium acetate, and B was methanol with 2 mM ammonium acetate. Gradient elution was 0-30 min and 5-100% B. Flow rate was 0.5 ml/min, the injection volume was 5 μl, and UV detection was carried out by a photodiode array detector. ESI-MS was recorded for 30 min in the m/z region from 100 to 2000 Da with the following instrument parameters: ion spray voltage = 5500 V, source gas = 50 l/min, curtain gas = 30 l/min, declustering potential = 50V, focusing potential = 250 V, temperature = 450°C, and detector voltage = 2300 V. LC-MS analysis was undertaken by high-resolution ESI-MS (R 10,000; tolerance for mass accuracy = 5 ppm). As standards, (+)-catechin (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) and (-)-epicatechin (Sigma-Aldrich) were used.

Total polyphenol determination of MeOH soluble and insoluble fractions of GPE
Since LC-ESI-MS analysis as described above revealed that phenolic compounds were contained in MeOH soluble fraction, total polyphenol concentrations of MeOH soluble and insoluble fractions of GPE were compared. An aliquot (50 ml) of GPE was concentrated to dryness in vacuo, and extracted twice with 10 ml of MeOH followed by centrifugation at 8, 000 rpm for 10 min to obtain supernatant and precipitate. The supernatant was further concentrated to dryness in vacuo, and the resultant dried residue was reconstituted in pure water to be 20 ml as a MeOH soluble fraction. The precipitate obtained after centrifugation was reconstituted in pure water to be 20 ml as a MeOH insoluble fraction. Total polyphenol concentrations in the two fractions were determined by Folin-Denis method as described above.

ROS generation of photo-irradiated MeOH soluble and insoluble fractions of GPE
Hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and •OH generation of photo-irradiated MeOH soluble and insoluble fractions of GPE were examined as described in our previous study [4]. For H 2 O 2 determination, 500 μl each of the MeOH soluble and insoluble fractions placed in a plastic cuvette was irradiated with LED light for 0, 5, and 10 min. Immediately after the irradiation, H 2 O 2 concentration was determined by a colorimetric method based on the peroxide-mediated oxidation of Fe 2+ followed by the reaction of Fe 3+ with xylenol orange [11]. For •OH determination in photo-irradiated fractions was performed using an ESR spin trapping technique. An aliquot (483 μl) of the sample was mixed with 17 μl of DMPO in a plastic cuvette to reach a final concentration of 300 mM for DMPO. Then, the mixed sample was irradiated with LED light for 15, 30, and 60 s. For a negative control, each mixed sample kept in a light-shielding box for 60 s was subjected to ESR determination of •OH. After irradiation, the sample was transferred to a quartz cell for ESR spectrometry, and the ESR spectrum was recorded on an X-band ESR spectrometer (JES-FA-100; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The measurement conditions for ESR were as follows: field sweep, 331.89-341.89 mT; field modulation frequency, 100 kHz; field modulation width, 0.1 mT; amplitude, 200; sweep time, 2 min; time constant, 0.03 s; microwave frequency, 9.420 GHz; and microwave power, 4 mW. TEMPOL (2 μM) was used as a standard to calculate the concentration of spin-trapped radicals, and the ESR spectrum of manganese (Mn 2+ ) held in the ESR cavity was used as an internal standard. All tests were performed in triplicate.

Comparison of •OH generation in photo-irradiated GPE and polyphenols
Firstly, concentration effect of GPE, GSE, and (+)-catechin on DMPO-OH (a spin adduct of DMPO and •OH) generation was examined. GPE was diluted with pure water to contain designated concentrations of total polyphenol. Both GSE and (+)-catechin were dissolved in pure water to make designated concentrations. An aliquot (483 μl) of the sample was mixed with 17 μl of DMPO in a plastic cuvette to reach a final concentration of 300 mM for DMPO. Then, the mixed sample was irradiated with LED light for 1 min followed by the ERS analysis as described above.
Secondly, photo-irradiation time effect on DMPO-OH formation was examined. GPE, GSE, and (+)-catechin samples were mixed with DMPO as described above (final concentrations of GPE, GSE, (+)-catechin, and DMPO were 0.25 mg total polyphenol, 1 mg, 1 mg, and 300 mM, respectively), and was subjected to LED-light irradiation for designated time period followed by the ESR analysis as described above.
Thirdly, since irradiation time effect experiment as described above revealed that DMPO-OH level in all tested samples reached a plateau at irradiation time of around 1 min, it was examined if •OH was continuously generated during LED-light irradiation for longer than 1 min. In this experiment, DMPO was added to GPE, GSE, and (+)-catechin samples irradiated in advance with LED light for up to 2 hr (final concentrations of GPE, GSE, (+)-catechin, and DMPO were 0.25 mg total polyphenol, 1 mg, 1 mg, and 300 mM, respectively). Immediately after addition of DMPO, the sample was further irradiated with LED light for 1 min. Then ESR analysis was performed as described above.
Finally, to examine why DMPO-OH level reached a plateau, the following two experiments were conducted. One was examination of decay of DMPO-OH after LED-light irradiation for 1 min. GPE, GSE and (+)-catechin samples were irradiated with LED light for 1 min in the presence of DMPO as described above, and then time course changes in DMPO-OH level were monitored under a light shielding condition for up to 10 min. The other was examination of DMPO-OH generation under following there conditions; 1) each sample with 300 mM DMPO was irradiated with LED light for 1 min, and kept under the light shielding condition for 1 min, 2) each sample with 300 mM DMPO was irradiated with LED light for 2 min, and 3) each sample without DMPO was irradiated with LED light for 1 min, and further irradiated in the presence of 300 mM DMPO for 1 min. Then ESR analysis was performed as described above. In the two experiments, final concentrations of GPE, GSE, and (+)-catechin were 0.25 mg total polyphenol, 1 mg, and 1 mg, respectively. All tests were performed in triplicate.

Bactericidal assay
Staphylococcus aureus JCM 2413 purchased from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms, RIKEN BioResource Center (Wako, Japan) was used. A bacterial suspension was prepared in sterile physiological saline from a culture grown on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ) aerobically at 37°C overnight. In a plastic cuvette, 483 μl of sample was mixed with 17 μl of the bacterial suspension to reach final concentration of approximately 10 7 colony forming units (CFU)/ml for the bacteria. Then, the samples were exposed to LED light for 10 min. After irradiation, 50 μl of the sample was mixed with an equal volume of sterile catalase solution (5000 U/ml phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4)) to eliminate the effect of generated H 2 O 2 . A 10-fold serial dilution of the mixture was prepared using sterile physiological saline, and 10 μl of the diluted solution was seeded onto a BHI agar plate. The agar plates were cultured in the same way as described above for 2 days, and the CFU/ml was determined. In addition, each sample with the bacterial suspension that was kept for 10 min under a light shielding condition instead of being exposed to LED light was subjected to the same procedure. All tests were performed in triplicate.

Scavenging activity against •OH generated by a Fenton reaction
The assay used in this study was essentially identical to that described in a previous paper [12]. In brief, 50 μl of 2 mM H 2 O 2 , 50 μl of 89 mM DMPO, 50 μl of sample, and 50 μl of 0.2 mM FeSO 4 were placed in a test tube and mixed. Each mixture was transferred to an ESR spectrometry cell and the DMPO-OH spin adduct was quantified 60 s after the addition of FeSO 4 . The measurement conditions for ESR were essentially identical to those described above.

Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were undertaken using Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test and Student's t test for pairwise comparisons between multiple groups and comparison between two groups, respectively. Regarding the statistical significance in the CFU/ml obtained in the bactericidal assay assessed by Tukey-Kramer multi-comparison test, the analysis was performed following logarithmic conversion. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was also performed to determine if prior-irradiation time and post-irradiation time were significantly affected the DMPO-OH level. P<0.05 was considered significant.

LC-ESI-MS analysis for chemical composition of GPE
The MS and UV spectra of each peak were compared with those of known compounds using existing databases, the Dictionary of Natural Products (http://dnp.chemnetbase.com/). A representative LC chromatogram with estimated chemical structural formulas obtained from MeOH soluble fraction of GPE is shown in Fig 1. The fraction contained phenolic compounds including (+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin, catechin dimers, and polyphenolic glucosides.

Comparison of •OH generation in photo-irradiated GPE and polyphenols
Concentration effect of GPE, GSE, and (+)-catechin on •OH generation during LED-light irradiation for 1 min is summarized in Fig 6. Very slight concentration dependency in DMPO-OH concentration was observed in GPE up to 0.25 mg/ml of total polyphenol, but no increase in      min, and the result of the two way ANOVA is summarized in Table 1. The two-way ANOVA showed a significant prior-irradiation time effect on DMPO-OH generation. Indeed, in GPE (0.25 mg/ml of total polyphenol) and GSE (1.0 mg/ml), slight decreases in DMPO-OH levels were observed with prior-irradiation time, and the levels reduced by around 30% in the both samples irradiated in advance for 2 hr as compared with those without prior-irradiation. DMPO-OH levels in (+)-catechin (1.0 mg/ml) did not significantly change, and almost the same level was kept even after irradiated in advance for 2 hr.    Table 2. The two-way ANOVA showed no significant post-irradiation time effect on DMPO-OH levels. Indeed, DMPO-OH generated by photo-irradiation was relatively stable at least for 10 min regardless of the initial levels.    LED-light irradiation alone showed somewhat bactericidal activity. That is, LED-light irradiation of pure water for 10 min showed approximately 1 log reduction of viable bacterial count (CFU/ml) when compared with the pure water group without LED-light irradiation. LED-light irradiation of GPE for 10 min significantly killed the bacteria in a concentration dependent manner, and 0.063 and 0.25 mg total polyphenol/ml of GPE achieved 1 and 2 log reduction of viable bacterial count, respectively, compared with that of photo-irradiated pure water group. Photo-irradiated GPE and (+)-catechin also showed bactericidal effect in a concentration dependent manner, but their effects did not exceed that of GPE.

Bactericidal assay
Scavenging activity against •OH generated by a Fenton reaction Although GSE and (+)-catechin also showed scavenging activity, only around 30% of •OH was scavenged by the two even at the concentration of 0.5 mg/ml.  Discussion LC-ESI-MS analysis revealed that polyphenolic compounds including catechin monomers, dimers, trimers, and polyphenolic glucosides were contained in MeOH soluble fraction of GPE (Figs 1 and 2). Catechin dimers and trimers which correspond to m/z 579 and 867, respectively, are also known as proanthocyanidins. Since proanthocyanidins are noteworthy for their potent antioxidative potential [11] and both antioxidant and prooxidant activities likely derive from the oxidation of phenolic hydroxyl groups, it is expected that their ability to generate ROS upon photo-irradiation would be also potent. Since MeOH insoluble fraction was not suitable for MS analysis because of apprehensiveness of contamination in the ionization chamber, chemical composition of the fraction could not be analyzed. Instead, a spectrophotometric analysis showed that total polyphenol content of MeOH soluble fraction was much higher than that of MeOH insoluble fraction (Fig 3), suggesting that MeOH soluble fraction would be a major contributor for prooxidative potential of GPE. Indeed, both H 2 O 2 and •OH generation in photo-irradiated MeOH soluble fraction were much higher than those in photo-irradiated MeOH insoluble fraction (Figs 4 and 5). Nonetheless, although total polyphenol concentration in MeOH insoluble fraction was about 1/4 of that in MeOH soluble fraction, H 2 O 2 yields in MeOH insoluble fraction were 1/2 to 2/3 of those in MeOH soluble fraction, suggesting that polyphenols in MeOH insoluble fraction could have an ability to exert potent prooxidant activity. A further analysis for chemical composition MeOH insoluble fraction will be performed in the future. Taken these into consideration, it is suggested that polyphenolic compounds in GPE would be pivotal players as we hypothesized.
In comparison with GSE that is an authentic polyphenol product and (+)-catechin, prooxidative profiles of GPE were similar to those of GSE and (+)-catechin. That is, 1) •OH generation expressed as DMPO-OH concentration during 1 min of photo-irradiation reached a plateau at a certain concentration in all three samples tested (Fig 6), 2) in the experiment where the effect of photo-irradiation time on DMPO-OH generation was examined, DMPO-OH levels in all the samples reached a plateau at around 1 min of irradiation (Fig 7), 3) in the experiment where the effect of prior-irradiation time on the DMPO-OH generation was examined, the DMPO-OH levels reduced by only 30% in GPE and GSE after 2 hr of prior-irradiation, and the level unchanged in (+)-catechin after 2 hr (Fig 8). These results indicate that although •OH was continuously generated in all the samples at least up to 2 hr, resultant DMPO-OH did not increase after around 1 min of photo-irradiation. To explain the discrepancy between •OH and DMPO-OH generation, the decay of DMPO-OH was examined (Fig 9). Since DMPO-OH generated by photo-irradiation was relatively stable at least for 10 min regardless of the initial levels, the decay of DMPO-OH was not involved in the mechanism by which DMPO-OH level indicate LED-light irradiation with DMPO for 1 min, and no LED-light irradiation with DMPO for 1 min, and LED-light irradiation without DMPO for 1 min, respectively, DMPO-levels in all the three samples almost unchanged (Fig 10), suggesting that DMPO-OH would be degraded by newly formed •OH and/or be reduced to a cyclic hydroxyl amine by electrons and protons derived from photo-oxidized polyphenols. In the latter case, the cyclic hydroxylamine is ESR silent [13]. In Fig 7 for instance, this would have reduced the level of DMPO-OH in GPE from around 2 μM to 1.3 μM after photo-irradiation for 10 min.
Bactericidal activity of photo-irradiated GPE, GSE, and (+)-catechin seemed to well reflect their prooxidative potentials in terms of •OH generation. That is, bactericidal effect of photoirradiated samples was in the order of GPE > GSE (+)-catechin (Fig 11), which was in accordance with •OH generation by photo-irradiated samples as shown in Fig 6. Although polyphenols are noteworthy for their antioxidant activity, attention has recently been paid to their prooxidative potential. For instance, it was reported that an important anticancer and antibacterial mechanisms of polyphenols is mediated through ROS generation, which is a characteristic feature of prooxidative properties of polyphenolic compounds, leading to cancer and bacterial cell death [14,15]. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that photooxidation of phenolic hydroxyl group of polyphenolic compounds results in reduction of oxygen molecule to form H 2 O 2 which in turn is photolyzed to generate •OH [4,6,7]. Since antioxidant activity of polyphenolic compounds is also mediated by the auto-oxidation of phenolic hydroxyl group [16,17], prooxidative potential and antioxidative potential of polyphenolic compounds seem to like two sides of a coin. Indeed, as was the case with •OH generation by photo-irradiated samples, scavenging activity of GPE against •OH generated by the Fenton reaction was higher than that of GSE and (+)-catechin (Fig 12). This would be attributable to their antioxidant activity. Getting back to prooxidative potential, as shown in Fig 6, a slight decrease in the DMPO-OH concentration was found in GPE with 0.5 mg/ml of total polyphenol, and no increases in 2.0 mg/ml of GSE, and 2.0 mg/ml of (+)-catechin. When the concentration is over 0.25 mg/ml total polyphenol in GPE, for instance, the antioxidant activity might prevail against •OH generation of photo-irradiated GPE resulting in the decreased or the static yield. Indeed, in our previous study in which ROS generation was examined in photo-irradiated proanthocyanidin [7], a bell-shaped yield was obtained for •OH.
In the present study, prooxidative properties of only one grape variety, Niagara, were examined. Since Niagara is a grape variety for white wine, it was of our interest to examine a grape variety for red wine. Thus, we conducted additional experiments in which grape pomace of a grape variety Zweigelt that was subjected to a vinification process of red wine was used. In the experiments, total polyphenol concentration of Zweigelt GPE was adjusted to 0.5 mg/ml, and •OH and H 2 O 2 generation were compared with those of Niagara GPE with 0.5 mg/ml total polyphenol. As a result, •OH and H 2 O 2 generation from photo-irradiated ZGPE were lower than those from photo-irradiated NGPE by approximately 60 and 50%, respectively (S1 Fig), suggesting that difference in variety and harvest conditions of grapes would affect prooxidative potential. To confirm this, we will try to compare prooxidative potential of multiple samples in the future.
From these, photo-irradiated GPE, one of the representative waste materials or byproducts obtained from winemaking process, could be used for a novel disinfection technique, and its prooxidative potential upon photo-irradiation would be attributable to polyphenolic compounds contained in GPE. Regarding the GPE used in the present study, the prooxidant activity in terms of •OH generation upon photo-irradiation could be retained for at least a couple of hours, and more potent than that of an authentic polyphenol product, GSE, and a pure polyphenolic compound, (+)-catechin.