Scoping Review of the Zika Virus Literature

The global primary literature on Zika virus (ZIKV) (n = 233 studies and reports, up to March 1, 2016) has been compiled using a scoping review methodology to systematically identify and characterise the literature underpinning this broad topic using methods that are documented, updateable and reproducible. Our results indicate that more than half the primary literature on ZIKV has been published since 2011. The articles mainly covered three topic categories: epidemiology of ZIKV (surveillance and outbreak investigations) 56.6% (132/233), pathogenesis of ZIKV (case symptoms/ outcomes and diagnosis) 38.2% (89/233) and ZIKV studies (molecular characterisation and in vitro evaluation of the virus) 18.5% (43/233). There has been little reported in the primary literature on ZIKV vectors (12/233), surveillance for ZIKV (13/233), diagnostic tests (12/233) and transmission (10/233). Three papers reported on ZIKV prevention/control strategies, one investigated knowledge and attitudes of health professionals and two vector mapping studies were reported. The majority of studies used observational study designs, 89.7% (209/233), of which 62/233 were case studies or case series, while fewer (24/233) used experimental study designs. Several knowledge gaps were identified by this review with respect to ZIKV epidemiology, the importance of potential non-human primates and other hosts in the transmission cycle, the burden of disease in humans, and complications related to human infection with ZIKV. Historically there has been little research on ZIKV; however, given its current spread through Australasia and the Americas, research resources are now being allocated to close many of the knowledge gaps identified in this scoping review. Future updates of this project will probably demonstrate enhanced evidence and understanding of ZIKV and its impact on public health.


Introduction
Zika virus (ZIKV) was first identified in rhesus monkeys in the Zika forest of Uganda in 1947 and has circulated in Africa and Asia relatively unnoticed for sixty years [1]. It is a Flavivirus transmitted by Aedes spp. mosquitoes, particularly Aedes aegypti, and infection is frequently asymptomatic. Clinical manifestations include rash, mild fever, arthralgia, conjunctivitis, myalgia, retro-orbital pain, headache and cutaneous maculopapular rash [2]. The epidemiology of ZIKV changed in 2007 when an outbreak occurred on Yap Island of the Federated States of Micronesia; this was the first report of infection outside of Africa or Asia. In 2013-2014 outbreaks occurred in New Caledonia, French Polynesia, the Cook Islands, Easter Island, Vanuatu, Samoa, Brazil (2015) and currently (March 2016) 31 countries in the Americas have reported autochthonous transmission [3]. With the geographic spread, a previously unreported clinical pattern began to emerge with an increase in cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (French Polynesia) and a rise in infants born with microcephaly in Brazil [4].
A systematic summary of the global scientific knowledge regarding ZIKV and effective prevention and control measures is required to support evidence-informed decision making concerning this emerging public health issue. Scoping reviews are a synthesis method designed to address broad, often policy-driven research questions [5][6][7] by identifying all the relevant evidence concerning the issue and producing summaries of the findings [5,6,8]. Scoping reviews, similar to systematic reviews, follow a structured protocol for the identification and characterisation of the literature in a manner that is both reproducible and updateable [5,6,9]. Unlike a systematic review, a scoping review is well-suited to the identification of evidence on a broad topic, but does not include a quality assessment or in depth data extraction stage that would be required for meta-analysis of studies. Systematic reviews may be prioritized as a next step based on the results of a scoping review if adequate research exists on specific questions of interest [9,10]. Another important output of a scoping review is the identification of where evidence is lacking or non-existent to help direct future research and use of resources.

Objective
In response to the current ZIKV outbreaks and changes in its epidemiology, a scoping review was conducted to capture all published literature addressing the following aspects of ZIKV: 1) ZIKV infection in humans, any host or vector-pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, conditions for virus transmission, and surveillance for ZIKV, 2) studies on ZIKV-pathogenesis, transmission and molecular mechanisms, 3) prevention strategies to prevent ZIKV infections and/or control of ZIKV harbouring vectors, and 4) societal knowledge, perception and attitudes towards ZIKV.

Review protocol, team and expertise
To ensure the scoping review methods were reproducible, transparent and consistent, a scoping review protocol was developed a priori. The protocol, list of definitions, search algorithms, abstract screening form and data characterization and utility form (DCU) are available upon request. The location of the repository of relevant articles and the dataset resulting from this review is available upon request.
The review team consisted of individuals with multi-disciplinary expertise in epidemiology, microbiology, veterinary public health, knowledge synthesis and information science.

Scoping review descriptive statistics
Of the 820 abstracts and titles screened for relevance, 270 were considered potentially relevant primary research/data and the full article was obtained, data was extracted and categorized for 233 relevant primary research articles in English or French, Fig 1. Research was scarce and sporadic after the virus was first isolated in 1947, until the outbreak on Yap Island, Micronesia in 2007; the majority of primary research on ZIKV has been published since 2011, 73.0% (170/ 233) , Fig 2. The general characteristics of the included articles are described in Table 1. Most included articles were peer-reviewed 63.9% (149/233) and in English 91.0% (212/233). Fifteen articles were in languages other than French and English (Spanish (7), Portuguese (3), Chinese (3), Russian (1), and German (1)) and Fig 1. The largest body of research is now from the Americas 34.87% (81/233), followed by Australasia 24.9% (58/233) and Africa, 24.0% (56/233), the remaining research was fairly evenly distributed over the other continents. The articles mainly covered three topic categories: epidemiology of ZIKV (surveillance and outbreak investigations) 56.6% (132/233), pathogenesis of ZIKV (case symptoms/ outcomes and diagnosis) 38.2% (89/233) and ZIKV studies (molecular characterisation and in vitro evaluation of the virus) 18.5% (43/233). There has been little reported in the primary literature on ZIKV vectors (12/233), ZIKV surveillance (13/233), diagnostic tests (12/233) and transmission (10/233). Three papers reported on ZIKV prevention/control strategies [30][31][32], one investigated knowledge and attitudes of health professionals [33] two vector mapping studies [34,35] and one ZIKV transmission model were reported [36]. The majority of studies used observational study designs, 89.7% (209/233) of which 62/233 were case studies or case series, while fewer (24/233) used experimental study designs.
In the 233 included articles, human populations were the most frequently reported (191/ 233) with 15 studies focusing solely on pediatric populations (<16 years old), Table 2. Blood was the most common sample (179/191) used to evaluate ZIKV infection or seropositivity in humans, Table 2. Monkeys were the most frequently studied non-human hosts (7/13) followed by three recent studies (4 citations) on bats from which none report ZIKV isolation, Table 2. Mice were used for the majority of animal model experiments (13/15) while monkeys were used in 4/15 studies, Table 2.

ZIKV virus studies
A small number of studies examined the attributes of ZIKV, Table 3. Early reports describe a 40 mμ, spherical shaped virus [37] that infects the nucleus of cells [27]. Others examined the antigenic relatedness of various Flaviviruses [26,38]. The virus growth, replication and survival in human cell lines [39] and in vivo (mice) was investigated [40] and the pathogenesis in mice has also been described [38,41,42]. The evaluation of a mouse model for virus propagation is described in three studies [42][43][44]; the mouse model was also used in 13 studies to identify and propagate ZIKV. In one report, researchers describe the use of chick embryos and inoculation of the yolk sac for virus propagation as being comparable to intracerebral inoculation of mice [45]. Earlier studies were identified that examined the cross neutralization tests and cross complement fixation tests on a number of new and known viruses to examine their relatedness [45] and used a monkey model to show there was no cross-immunity with yellow-fever and ZIKV [46].

Zika Vectors
Known ZIKV vectors are all mosquitos; no evidence was identified for any other type of vector. Table 4 reports on the 26 mosquito vector studies that tested 45 different mosquito species for either a natural infection with ZIKV or evaluated the mosquito species for vector competence to transmit ZIKV. Eighteen species of mosquitos were found to be positive for ZIKV during epidemiological sampling in Africa and Asia from 1956 to 2015 and eight were evaluated experimentally for vector competence, Table 4. Ae. aegypti 15/26, and Ae. africanus 10/26 were investigated most often. Ae. albopictus, a species of particular interest as a possible vector for ZIKV in North America, was evaluated for vector competence in one study and as a naturally infected vector of ZIKV in two studies. Experimental studies examining vector competence and feeding activity under laboratory conditions (24-29 C and 75-95% relative humidity) mainly focused on Ae. aegypti and provided data on infection rates, dissemination rates, transmission rates, minimum infection rate, entomologic inoculation rate or mean biting rate, Table 5. Studies on Ae. aegypti demonstrated that individual mosquitos held under laboratory conditions transmitted ZIKV 33-100% of the time and transmission of the virus occurred irrespective of whether the mosquito was engorged with a blood meal [90]. In one experiment infected Ae. aegypti transmitted ZIKV to a rhesus monkey 72 days post mosquito infection [89]. Mitigation by biological control was investigated in one experiment where the researcher examined the transferability of mosquito resistance to ZIKV between species (Ae. aegypti and Ae. formosus), however they concluded the resistance gene is complex and not easily manipulated [31].
Active mosquito surveillance programs were reported in three studies in Uganda, Senegal and Burkina Faso between 1946 and 1986, where routine samples were collected [35,94,97]. Studies that conducted surveillance activities or prevalence surveys of mosquitos for ZIKV were identified from Africa and Asia and several species were implicated as possible vectors including Ae. aegypti (5 studies) and Ae. albopictus (1 study), Table 6. The results of the studies in Table 6 were not necessarily conducted when ZIKV was actively circulating.
Several epidemiological studies examining risk factors for mosquito abundance, human exposure to mosquitos and conditions for ZIKV infected mosquitos were identified by the scoping review. Observations include some mosquito species such as Ae. aegypti are well suited to urban environments, are often trapped within homes [87] and are able to reproduce in water containers which are frequently found in homes. For example, on Yap Island during the 2007 outbreak 87% of the homes were found to have mosquito infested water containers [85,100]. Biting behaviour of mosquitos was shown to increase in the two months following rainfall and decreased at temperatures less than 13°C [97]. A study conducted in Senegal found the forest canopy and forest ground areas were more likely to yield ZIKV positive mosquitoes [91]. From 13 species of mosquitos examined, Ae. furcifer showed significant temporal variation and Ae. luteocephalus and Ae. taylori showed a significant correlation between biting and infection rates with a one month lag time [91]. A vector mapping model based on mosquito data collected in Senegal between 1972 and 2008 demonstrated ZIKV was not correlated with the incidence of other viruses, the abundance of mosquitos, mean temperature or humidity [35]. However, ZIKV was shown to increase 12% (95% CI = 5%-21%) for each additional inch of rain above the baseline, was positively correlated with Chikungunya virus at a 6 year lag time, and was correlated with Ae. fuciferi and Ae. taylori at a 13 year lag time [35]. The minimum infection rate for Ae. furcifer and Ae. taylori was 80% (95% CI = 41%-94%) lower than for Ae. luteocephalus [35]. Non-human hosts of ZIKV Zika virus was first isolated in 1947 in a rhesus sentinel monkey used for yellow fever surveillance [1]. Subsequent studies in Africa to evaluate potential hosts of ZIKV examined a number of small mammals in the Zika forest and bats in Uganda, but failed to identify ZIKV or seroreactivity to ZIKV in any sample,  [28,105]. One study, published in two papers, on the orangutans in the Sabah region of Malaysia reported a higher seroprevalence among free-ranging orangutans compared to the semi-captive group and higher seroprevalence among humans than orangutans [22,23]. They hypothesize that ZIKV among orangutans may be incidental infections from mosquitos that had contact with viremic humans or another sylvatic cycle [22,23]. At this time it has been experimentally demonstrated that infected mosquitos can transmit ZIKV to mice and monkeys under controlled laboratory conditions [89]. However, no studies were identified that examined the relative importance of non-human primates or other potential hosts compared to humans in the transmission cycle of ZIKV. Pathogenesis of ZIKV infection in rhesus monkeys has been described for two animals; the initial sentinel monkey developed fever and was viremic on day 3 of the fever. The second monkey who was subcutaneously challenged with ZIKV showed no signs of disease, but was viremic on days 4-5 and tested seropositive 30 days after exposure [1,44]. Mice were primarily used across 13 laboratory studies published between 1952 and 1976 to study pathogenesis, Table 3. 45 studies examined the ZIKV characteristics: genotype, molecular characterisation, pathogenic attributes and virus propagation in mice.

Number of studies
Genotype reported:

Molecular characterisation:
Phylogeny was reported (e.g. dentogram, tree) 26 Virus was reported to be partially or fully sequenced 25 Evolution of the virus discussed 12 Examined proportion of nucleotide identities among strains and/or codon adaptation and fitness  transmission and to propagate ZIKV, Table 8 [1,38,42,44]. Pathogenesis of ZIKV infection in mice mainly consists of degeneration of nerve cells, wide-spread softening of the brain and often porencephaly [38,42], with little effect on other major organs [38]. In one experiment challenged rats, guinea pigs and rabbits did not show signs of illness, however, the rabbits became seropositive while the guinea pigs died [38]. No ZIKV could be identified in the guinea pigs to indicate the virus had a role in the deaths [38].

ZIKV in humans
Epidemiology. Studies investigating the epidemiology of ZIKV in humans (120/233) provided prevalence estimates (46) or summarized an outbreak situation (74) from 1952-2016 and included the following healthy populations: general and pediatric populations, blood donors and military personnel and acute viral fever patients as indicated in Table 9. The majority of the prevalence surveys and outbreak reports were from the Americas (44), Asia/Australasia (42) and Africa (30); some reported for more than one region. Risk factors for testing ZIKV positive were examined in three studies. On Yap Island, a study found men 77% [95% CI, 72% to 83%] were more likely to have IgM antibodies against ZIKV virus compared to women 68% [95% CI, 62% to 74%], which was a relative risk of 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0 to 1.2] [100]. Higher density housing was significantly associated with increased risk of arbovirus infections in Kenya (1970) [109]. A recent study from Zambia found that indoor residual spraying had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.81, 95% CI [0.66, 0.99] and having an iron sheet roof on the home was protective against being ZIKV seropositive. However, increasing age, farming and having a grass roof significantly increased the risk of being ZIKV seropositive [110].
Clinical Symptoms, Complications and Pathogenesis. Clinical symptoms associated with ZIKV illness in humans is reported in 72 studies and described in Table 10, including the first experimentally challenged human case recorded in Nigeria (1956) [88] to present cases in South America and the Caribbean region. Thirty four studies report travel related cases in individuals returning from various affected countries. Thirty five studies report on complications with ZIKV, Table 11. Publications that described the clinical features of ZIKV infection in      Table 10 for averages across studies. In a recent study, researchers found an association with more severe symptoms in patients that were co-infected with malaria [131]. Six studies reported co-infections with dengue and/or chikungunya [74,116,117,144,146,199], one study reported co-infection with Influenza B and another with Human Immunodeficiency Virus [81,189]. Some of these studies provide evidence for the viremic period, suggested which samples and diagnostic tests to use at various stages of infection and the possible range of incubation periods, however, only one study investigated the immune response in humans [200]. , investigated the role of cytokines and chemokines in the pathogenesis of ZIKV infected patients from the acute stage ( 10 days after symptom onset) to convalescent stage (> 10 days after disease onset) [200].
Complications associated with ZIKV infection in humans are reported in Table 11. The research and attention concentrated on all potential complications of ZIKV has increased

Joint pain
(usually wrist, fingers, ankles or knees affected, some reports of low back pain. Pain lasts typically less than a week, but there are reports of intermittent arthralgia for 1-2 months). Rash (common description: diffuse pink maculopapular rash which covered the face, neck, trunk and upper arms, occasionally this is reported as "itchy", typically appeared around day 2 of illness and faded around day 5, although there are cases where the rash lasted up to 2 weeks.). Conjunctivitis (red eyes)-mostly reported to occur in both eyes.
Muscle pain (reported to range from mild to severe and last 2-7 days).
Headache (mild headache often the first symptom and is reported to last 2-4 days).
Retro-orbital pain. Edema (usually in hands/fingers or ankles/feet) duration approximately 7 days.). Lymphadenopathy-duration up to 2 weeks. Often reported in cervical area. significantly in the last few months; we identified that many official reports and papers published the same information multiple times. A number of small case series or case studies investigating complications with ZIKV have demonstrated a chronological association between ZIKV infection in pregnant women and development of microcephaly in the fetus, ZIKV infection in fetuses and newborns from mothers exposed to ZIKV at various points during pregnancy, and ZIKV preceding neurological conditions, mainly Guillain-Barre syndrome in adults, Table 11. A significant increase in microcephaly has been reported in Brazil and a good deal of research and scrutiny of the existing data is on-going to determine the degree that ZIKV is contributing to microcephaly cases. Two studies discuss the criteria used to categorize infants as positive for microcephaly and the potential impact on the numbers reported in Brazil [247,248]; one study shows evidence of an increase in microcephaly in Brazil starting in 2012 prior to ZIKV arriving in the Americas [248]. Other birth defects have also been noted including a number of ocular abnormalities and hydrops fetalis [48,201]. Hopefully on-going cohort studies will provide better evidence for the role ZIKV plays in birth defects and fetal death.

Malaise
Outside of Brazil, no other country has noted the increase in microcephaly at the time of writing (March 1, 2016), however several countries in the Americas and Australasia have noted an increase in Guillain-Barré Syndrome coinciding with a ZIKV outbreak, Table 11 [146,242,246].
Transmission. ZIKV is known to be transmitted by mosquitos; however there is also increasing evidence that intrauterine transmission and sexual transmission via semen may occur, Table 12. It has also been suggested that transmission by blood transfusion is possible, although no cases have been reported [71]. Two studies examined the efficacy of amotosalen combined with UVA light treatment of plasma and recommended that it was effective to deactivate ZIKV [30,32].
Testing for ZIKV infection. Serum samples were most commonly used to diagnose ZIKV infection, but other samples including saliva, nasopharyngeal swabs, urine, semen, amniotic fluid and breast milk have also been used to detect ZIKV infection with RT-PCR, Table 13. There were very few studies (9) that evaluated a diagnostic test for ZIKV and of those only 33% reported data on test performance and none reported on a commercial test, Table 14. Of note, several studies captured in this review discuss potential cross-reactivity of some dengue serology tests during the acute phases of ZIKV infection, therefore laboratories and physicians need to follow readily available guidelines [249] so appropriate samples are taken for accurate diagnosis [208,211,212,227].
From the studies (n = 76) where details of cases and diagnosis were reported, RT-PCR was most frequently used (68.4%) followed by serology (40.8%) and virus isolation (3.9%); one study conducted a serum cytokine analysis [200]. Among the studies that used serology (n = 31), IgM was used in 80.6% of studies, IgG in 41.9% and plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT) in 67.7%. Four studies published before 1982 used hemagglutination-inhibition tests, complement fixation tests and neutralization tests [127,204,232,233].

Discussion
In this scoping study we identified 233 primary research papers, reports, theses and conference proceedings on ZIKV published between 1952 and March 1, 2016. There is evidence that the Asian lineage of ZIKV, which had been historically shown to be circulating in Malaysia  showed a consistent pattern of widespread brain calcifications, ventricular enlargement secondary to cortical/subcortical atrophy, excessive and redundant scalp skin in 11 (31%) cases, also suggests acute intrauterine brain injury, indicating an arrest in cerebral growth.
(Continued) 42 cases of GBS and increased incidence of neurological complications were reported associated with the ZIKV outbreak in the Pacific Islands. 37/42 GBS cases reported having a viral syndrome 6 (4-10) days before the onset of GBS. GBS symptoms peaked at 6 (4-9) days and by 3 months after discharge, 24 (57%) patients were able to walk without assistance. All GBS patients were hospitalized, median 11days (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)   Historically ZIKV was not known to cause severe illness in humans and for the first 60 years since its initial identification in Uganda (1947) there were only a few accounts of illness caused by ZIKV. These were mainly in laboratory workers who inadvertently became exposed to the virus. Epidemiological studies in this time period were mainly conducted in Africa and evaluated populations for seropositivity to ZIKV, but not active infection. In most countries where the population was tested for ZIKV, researchers found a proportion of the population had been exposed. This proportion varied widely and was likely affected by the types of samples and tests used, a variety of climatic factors, vectors present and their abundance, and other competing viruses circulating in the area. ZIKV can circulate at the same time as other viruses e.g. dengue and Chikungunya, sharing the same vector, however there is no evidence that exposure, infection or immunity to one virus impacts the outcome of a ZIKV infection or provides protection.
During the recent outbreaks from 2007 to present, reporting of data concerning clinical characteristics of ZIKV has significantly increased. Based on the Yap Island outbreak, 18% of exposed individuals are likely to experience symptoms, thus there is likely substantial underreporting of ZIKV infections as 80% of infected individuals may be asymptomatic [100]. Symptoms are usually mild and very similar to other co-circulating viruses (dengue and chikungunya), which makes diagnosis based on clinical symptoms challenging [173]. The World Health Organization released its interim case definition for ZIKV as a person presenting with clinical symptoms: rash or fever and one or more of arthralgia, arthritis or conjunctivitis and a positive IgM with epidemiological link (probable case) or a sample positive for ZIKV RNA or IgM with a positive PRNT for ZIKV vs. other flaviviruses [256]. However clinical identification of ZIKV is difficult due to similarities with other co-circulating viruses (e.g. dengue and chikungunya) and testing is currently the responsibility of specialized laboratories [257]. Potential complications reported following ZIKV infection are of great concern to the public health community. Associations with birth defects and neurological complications have been reported relatively recently causing the World Health Organization to issue an alert for precautionary measures and intense investigation to close the knowledge gaps associated with ZIKV potential to cause birth defects; mainly microcephaly [4,[258][259][260]. Reports of increased incidence of GBS and other neurological complications were noted in the French Polynesian and New Caledonia outbreaks [137,223,246] and have since been noted in several countries in South and Central America [117,173]. Currently Brazil, El Salvador, Venezuela, Colombia and Suriname have reported an increased incidence and Puerto Rico and Martinique have reported ZIKV associated cases of GBS [117,237,261]. A number of studies are underway to try to understand who is at high risk of developing GBS and other neurological symptoms following ZIKV infection [245]. Although birth defects such as microcephaly linked to ZIKV have been reported in Brazil and possibly from French Polynesia [148], it is not known why microcephaly has not been reported by other affected countries. This may be a matter of population size, a lag time between ZIKV spread and the birth of affected infants, and a lack of awareness that ZIKV may impact fetal development. Hopefully the retrospective and prospective studies underway in Brazil and other ZIKV affected countries will improve our understanding of the role of ZIKV in causing microcephaly, other birth defects and negative pregnancy outcomes as this is a current knowledge gap.
Guidelines have been developed for the diagnosis of ZIKV infection in humans and based on the studies captured in this review RT-PCR is most common on serum samples and is recommended for samples collected within the first 7 days of symptoms. Many studies were identified that used other samples (saliva, nasopharyngeal swabs, urine, cerebral spinal fluid, semen, amniotic fluid and breast milk) and RT-PCR to identify ZIKV RNA which would be indicative of ZIKV infection. Studies on some of these other sample types may offer a longer or later window of sampling for identification of the virus RNA with RT-PCR, but none have been widely used within primary research studies to date. The identification of ZIKV RNA in various types of bodily fluids raises questions of human to human transmission via saliva, semen and breast milk. At this time only sexual transmission via semen has been reported. ZIKV has been identified in semen up to 72 days post symptoms; however, this is based on a small number of observations and further research is needed to confirm and better understand this finding. Given the potential for ZIKV survival in semen for a long period of time, current guidelines suggest precautions are taken for up to 6 months following possible exposure to ZIKV to try to prevent some of the growing number of sexually transmitted cases reported from Europe and North America [215,221,227,[262][263][264]. Intrauterine transmission has also been shown to be highly plausible. The first case study was from French Polynesia in women who were already infected at time of delivery and infection was confirmed in both mothers and newborns; the newborns recovered from ZIKV infection without complications [222]. Studies from Brazil and other countries have now provided further evidence for the impact of ZIKV on fetuses in utero as several studies have reported ZIKV in amniotic fluid and deceased fetuses and infants with severe birth defects [55,80,172,214,222,240,251]. The implications of ZIKV infection during gestation and variability in the severity of birth defects depending on when maternal ZIKV exposure occurs during pregnancy are current knowledge gaps that are the focus of research progressing in the Americas [48,52,55,234,240,259]. Based on the first few case series of women exposed to ZIKV during pregnancy with documented fetal/infant outcomes, the data suggest ZIKV infection up to 20 weeks of gestation may be the highest risk for negative outcomes such as fetal death or birth defects [48,52,55,234,240,259]. Transmission by blood transfusion is also possible, although there are currently no documented cases of this type of transmission. There are studies from French Polynesia indicating the possible risk of transfusion due to subclinical viremic blood donors. Two studies demonstrated the efficacy of photochemical treatment of plasma to prevent plasma transfusion-transmitted ZIKV and potentially other arboviruses [30,32,71]. Only 56 publications on ZIKV preceded the 2007 Yap Island outbreak, which was the first time that wide spread illness due to ZIKV was documented. This research was primarily published in Africa and focused on vectors, hosts, and understanding the virus rather than on the burden of illness in humans. These articles provide evidence for the vector competence of several mosquito species to be infected with ZIKV and their ability to transmit ZIKV. They also suggest that non-human primates can be infected with ZIKV and may have a role in its transmission cycle. However, there is not enough evidence to conclude whether non-human primates are a reservoir or incidental host of ZIKV [23]. Very few surveys have been conducted on other animal species and the literature doesn't suggest other potential reservoirs including bats. Thus, identification of the reservoirs or potential spectrum of hosts for ZIKV remains a knowledge gap.
Molecular evaluation of ZIKV through time has been carried out in a few studies and suggest that ZIKV emerged in Uganda around the 1920s and demonstrated little preference for host or vector during its spread through west and central Africa and Asia [68,83]. They demonstrated that the ZIKV cycle may be 1-2 years compared to 5-8 year cycles seen by other viruses [68]. To date a significant change in the ZIKV genome that lead to increased pathogenesis in humans, increased virulence or spread to new competent vectors has not been described in the literature. Although given the range of vectors shown to be competent for ZIKV transmission, it is possible that ZIKV recently started cycling in a vector species it historically had not. Further research on the evolution of ZIKV and competent vectors may explain this knowledge gap.
Mitigation strategies to prevent or control ZIKV were the topic of one experimental study examining the complexity of a resistance gene in Ae. aegypti formosus and concluded that the resistance to ZIKV in this mosquito was complex and not easily transferred to other mosquito species [31]. Although general mosquito mitigation is outside the scope of this review, it is relevant to the prevention of ZIKV and other mosquito transmitted diseases.
This scoping review identified and characterized the global literature on ZIKV (up to March 1 st , 2016) and identified several knowledge gaps with respect to its epidemiology, the burden of disease in humans and complications related to ZIKV infection. Historically there has been little research on this virus, however, given the current spread of ZIKV through Australasia and the Americas, significant research resources have been allocated to closing many of the knowledge gaps identified in this scoping review. Future updates of this review will likely demonstrate enhanced evidence and understanding of ZIKV and its impact on public health.