Polymer Photovoltaic Cells with Rhenium Oxide as Anode Interlayer

The effect of a new transition metal oxide, rhenium oxide (ReO3), on the performance of polymer solar cells based on regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and methanofullerene [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) blend as buffer layer was investigated. The effect of the thickness of ReO3 layer on electrical characteristics of the polymer solar cells was studied. It is found that insertion of ReO3 interfacial layer results in the decreased performance for P3HT: PCBM based solar cells. In order to further explore the mechanism of the decreasing of the open-circuit voltage (Voc), the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is used to investigate the ReO3 oxidation states. Kelvin Probe method showed that the work function of the ReO3 is estimated to be 5.13eV after thermal evaporation. The results indicated the fact that a portion of ReO3 decomposed during thermal evaporation process, resulting in the formation of a buffer layer with a lower work function. As a consequence, a higher energy barrier was generated between the ITO and the active layer.


Introduction
Organic solar cells are promising candidates for clean energy and have the advantages of flexibility and low production cost, compared to their inorganic counterparts [1][2]. Significant effort has been made toward improving the performance of organic solar cells. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of polymer solar cells based on a blend of regioregular poly (3-hexylthiophene) (rr-P3HT) and methanofullerene [6,6]-phenyl C 61 -butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) has reached 5% [3]. Indium tin oxide (ITO) is used as the transparent hole collecting anode. Works on the cell structure modification and insertion of buffer layer material between ITO and the active layer have been reported to improve the short circuit current density (J sc ) in the polymer solar cell. The efficiency of polymer photovoltaic cells is greatly improved when poly(ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) doped with poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS) is used as a buffer layer. The function of PEDOT: PSS is to prevent electron leakage from the bulk heterojunction (BHJ) acceptor to the anode, to enhance photo-generated hole extraction, and to planarize the ITO surface. Nevertheless, recently many researchers have found that PEDOT: PSS also has many disadvantages. For example, they are highly acidic (PH~1) and corrosive to the ITO anode [3]. Spin coated PEDOT: PSS films have large microstructure and electrical inhomogeneities, yielding inconsistent morphologies and electrical conductivity in different regions [4]. These effects may lead to inhomogeneous charge extraction. Furthermore, the using of PEDOT: PSS causes the decreasing of the stability of devices [5][6]. These limitations motivate the development of a more effective interfacial layer to replace the PEDOT: PSS for optimum performance. Previously, T.J. Marks et al have reported a cross-linked blend of poly [9, 9-dioctylfluorene-co-N-[4-(3-methylpropyl)]-diphenylamine] (TFB) +4, 4'-bis [(p-trichlorosilylpropylphenyl) phenylamino] biphenyl (TPDSi 2 ) as anode interfacial layer to replace the PEDOT: PSS [7]. Several metal oxides (NiO, V 2 O 5 , MoO 3 ) have also been demonstrated as efficient buffer layers in the polymer photovoltaic cells [8][9]. However, their toxicity and high evaporation temperature hinders their practical application in organic electronics. In this work, a PEDOT: PSS/ rhenium oxide (ReO 3 ) complex layer was designed and applied as anode buffer layer. ReO 3 can be evaporated at a lower temperature (~340°C) than MoO 3 and V 2 O 5 , alleviating the drawbacks of metal oxides in a practical manufacturing process induced by a high evaporation temperature [10]. Moreover, it is said that the ReO 3 material has a high work function of about 6.0 eV [11]. The performance of polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells is investigated and compared with traditional devices using PEDOT: PSS as a buffer layer.

Substrate preparation
ITO-coated glass with a sheet resistance of 10 O/ square was used for device fabrication. The routine cleaning procedure included sonication in a solution of detergent, deionised (DI) water, and isopropyl alcohol in sequence.

Device fabrication and characterization
The procedure for the solar cell device fabrication is described as follows. The patterned ITOcoated glass was ultra-sonicated with acetone, isopropanol, and de-ionized water for 10 min. The PEDOT: PSS layer of about 25 nm thickness was obtained by spin coating at 3000 rpm for 40 s from an aqueous solution (Baytron P VP Al 4083) on ITO coated glass substrates, followed by baking at 120°C for 5 minutes in air. ReO 3 (Aldrich, purity 99.9%) was thermally evaporated onto PEDOT:PSS in 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 3 nm thick under a vacuum of about 1×10 −6 Torr. The blend of P3HT: PCBM (1:0.8 weight-ratio) chlorobenzene solution was spin coated at 1000 rpm for 60 s. The P3HT: PCBM coated substrates were heated at 150°C in a nitrogen atmosphere for 10 min to remove residual solvent before transferring to a vacuum system. Finally, 100nm thickness Al was thermally deposited on top of the active layer under a vacuum of about 1×10 −6 Torr. A control device using PEDOT: PSS as anode buffer layer is also fabricated for comparsion. The active layer area of the device was 0.09 cm 2 . The un-encapsulated devices were measured in the ambient atmosphere (25±5°C, 35±5% relative humidity) under intensity of 100 mW/cm 2 white light illuminations by using a 300 W solar simulator (Thermal Oriel 91160) with an AM1.5 G filter. The light intensity was calibrated with an Oriel mono-Si reference cell (CROWNTECH PVM 272 certificated by NREL). I-V curves were swept with a Keithley 2400 source meter from -1 to +1 V in steps of 10 mV with a speed of 0.1 s per step until stable efficiency. The WF of the ITO substrate coated with ReO 3 interlayer was evaluated by Kelvin probe method in the air using a KP 020 Ambient Kelvin Probe system. The XPS spectra was recorded using a Kratos Axis Ultra DLD spectrometer employing a monochromated Al-Kα X-ray source (hv = 1486.6 eV), hybrid (magnetic / electrostatic) optics and a multi-channel plate and delay line detector (DLD). All XPS spectra were recorded using an aperture slot of 300 Ã 700 microns. Survey spectra were recorded with a pass energy of 160 eV, and high resolution spectra with a pass energy of 40 eV. In both wide and narrow scans, the C 1s peak at 285.0 eV of adventitious surface hydrocarbons was used to reference charge-induced binding energy shifts in the sample. The molecular structure of the materials used in the experiment and the schematic device structure are shown in Fig 1.

Results and Discussion
The J-V characteristics curve for the devices under an intensity of 100 mW/cm 2 white light illumination with different thickness of ReO 3 layer is shown in Fig 2. The detailed results are also given in Table 1. The J-V curve for device with ITO/PEDOT: PSS as buffer layer is also shown for comparison. The device with PEDOT: PSS buffer layer provides a significant improvement in the device performance. The PCE is 4.15%, with J sc = 13.54 mA/cm 2 , V oc = 0.60 V, and FF = 51.1%. Furthermore, the insertion a 0.2 nm ReO 3 layer between PEDOT: PSS and the active layer results in the decrease in J sc of 12.64 mA/cm 2 . The V oc decreases to 0.58V, and FF of 46.4%. The overall PCE is therefore 3.40%. The PCE of the device with 1 nm ReO 3 is 2.9%, with J sc = 12.04 mA/cm 2 , V oc = 0.55V, and FF = 43.8%. Consequently, the PCE decreases significantly, rising from 4.15% to 2.9%, a 30% decrease compared with the control devices. Fig 2b  shows the incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) curves (or the external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra) of devices with different thickness of ReO 3 interfacial layer. The IPCE spectra of photovoltaic cells compare very well with those previously reported for P3HT: PCBM blend films. The IPCE results are in agreement with the measured performance. Interestingly, the reported work function of the ReO 3 and PEDOT: PSS is about 6.0 eV and 5.2 eV, respectively. Theoretically, the performance of the device using ReO 3 should be better than that of the control device. The observed result is very different from what we have expected. Therefore, we also fabricated devices consisting only ReO 3 (without PEDOT: PSS) as a buffer layer. The PCE of the optimum device with 10 nm ReO 3 layer is 2.8%, with J sc = 13.6 mA/cm 2 , V oc = 0.45V, and FF = 53.6%. For organic BHJ solar cells, their maximum value of V oc max depends on the characteristics of the organic/metal contacts. The maximum V oc for the devices with ohmic contacts is governed by the energy difference between the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the acceptor and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the donor. On the other hand, in the case of non-ohmic contacts, V oc max is given by the difference in work functions between the anode and the cathode, which follow the metal-insulator-metal model [12]. In our devices, the donor and acceptor materials are the same for all devices. The difference in work functions between the anode (F ITO = 4.7eV) and the cathode (F Al = 4.28 eV) is 0.42 eV, which is much closer to the measured V oc = 0.45V. To clarify the origin of the V oc decrease in the devices, the optical absorption for ReO 3 film with different thickness on quartz substrate was measured by an ultraviolet-visible spectrometer. The results are shown in Fig 3. The absorption spectrum is very similar. The average optical transmittance was higher than 98% in the visible range (380-780nm). This small difference could not attribute to more than 30% V oc decrease in our experiment. Therefore, the only possible explanation for the observed phenomena may be caused by reduction in the efficiency of the carrier collection at electrodes. We suspected that a decomposition reaction of ReO 3 was happened during thermally evaporation, resulting in the formation of a buffer layer with a lower work function. As a consequence, a higher energy barrier was generated between the    Fig 4d is located at 42.2 and 44.6 eV. More highly resolved (narrow) scans over the Re 4f 7/2, 5/2 spin-orbit coupling doublet peak (40-52 eV) regions were subsequently acquired. So de-convolution was carried out to deduce oxidation states of Re. Deconvolution of the narrow scan profiles for the samples was done using the XPS PEAK program. Shirley (non-linear) baselines, 70% Gaussian/ 30% Lorentzian synthetic peaks were used and a set of constraining criteria applied to provide a measure of objectivity to the deconvolutions. A brief description of the criteria required is as follows: First, the peak areas of the synthetic Re 4f spin-orbit coupling doublets are constrained to be 1.33 (the ratio of the relative degeneracy given by 2J +1 of the 4f 7/2 and 4f 5/2 peaks (where J the spin orbit coupling In comparison with the standard XPS data from NIST database website, deconvolution showed the O 1s narrow scan to be made up from the contributions of three O 1s components. [14] This indicated that rhenium oxides was present in at least 3 oxidation states in the sample. The lower binding energy components indicate the presence of Re (IV) oxides located at 530.6 eV while the higher binding energy component, located at 531.2 eV and 531.9 eV respectively, proves the presence of higher oxidation states of Re(VI) and Re(VII). Our study showed that the rhenium oxide (ReO 3 ) is not thermally stable. The XPS spectrum shows conclusively that a series of oxidation state Re oxides are existed on the substrates. Thus, we infer that partial thermal evaporated ReO 3 may tend to decompose into ReO 2 and Re 2 O 7 under our experimental conditions following the expected disproportionation thermal decomposition route: The presence of Re 2 O 7 in the substrate might be explained due to volatilization. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is also used to investigate the thermal evaporated ReO 3 . Fig 5 shows the TGA results of ReO 3 (a) and ReO 3 (c), respectively. The TGA analysis reveals that under inert atmosphere, the onset decomposition temperature (Td, 5% weight loss) for ReO 3 (a) and ReO 3 (c) were 452 and 423°C, respectively. After that rapid weight loss is observed. It implies that some reactions were taken place during thermal evaporation process.
All evidences indicated that ReO 3 with poor thermal stability is not adequate as potential anode buffer layer for the fabrication process of organic photovoltaic devices.

Conclusion
In conclusion, we have investigated polymer photovoltaic devices based on P3HT: PCBM blend using ReO 3 as interfacial buffer layer. The effect of thickness of ReO 3 on electrical characteristics of the device was also studied. A J sc of 13.6 mA/cm 2 , V oc of 0.45 V, and a PCE of 2.8% were obtained for optimum device under simulated AM1.5G 100 mW/cm 2 intensity in air. Compared with traditional device using PEDOT: PSS as buffer layer, insertion of ReO 3 interfacial layer result in the decreased performance for P3HT: PCBM solar cells. XPS and Kelvin Probe results revealed that a portion of ReO 3 decomposed into ReO 2 during thermal evaporation process, resulting in the formation of a buffer layer with a lower work function. As a result, a higher energy barrier was generated between the ITO and the active layer. Our results also revealed that the WF of the ReO 3 material might be overestimated.