Evidence of Circadian Rhythm, Oxygen Regulation Capacity, Metabolic Repeatability and Positive Correlations between Forced and Spontaneous Maximal Metabolic Rates in Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens

Animal metabolic rate is variable and may be affected by endogenous and exogenous factors, but such relationships remain poorly understood in many primitive fishes, including members of the family Acipenseridae (sturgeons). Using juvenile lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens), the objective of this study was to test four hypotheses: 1) A. fulvescens exhibits a circadian rhythm influencing metabolic rate and behaviour; 2) A. fulvescens has the capacity to regulate metabolic rate when exposed to environmental hypoxia; 3) measurements of forced maximum metabolic rate (MMRF) are repeatable in individual fish; and 4) MMRF correlates positively with spontaneous maximum metabolic rate (MMRS). Metabolic rates were measured using intermittent flow respirometry, and a standard chase protocol was employed to elicit MMRF. Trials lasting 24 h were used to measure standard metabolic rate (SMR) and MMRS. Repeatability and correlations between MMRF and MMRS were analyzed using residual body mass corrected values. Results revealed that A. fulvescens exhibit a circadian rhythm in metabolic rate, with metabolism peaking at dawn. SMR was unaffected by hypoxia (30% air saturation (O2sat)), demonstrating oxygen regulation. In contrast, MMRF was affected by hypoxia and decreased across the range from 100% O2sat to 70% O2sat. MMRF was repeatable in individual fish, and MMRF correlated positively with MMRS, but the relationships between MMRF and MMRS were only revealed in fish exposed to hypoxia or 24 h constant light (i.e. environmental stressor). Our study provides evidence that the physiology of A. fulvescens is influenced by a circadian rhythm and suggests that A. fulvescens is an oxygen regulator, like most teleost fish. Finally, metabolic repeatability and positive correlations between MMRF and MMRS support the conjecture that MMRF represents a measure of organism performance that could be a target of natural selection.


Introduction
Animal metabolic rate is variable and may be influenced by both endogenous factors (e.g. circadian rhythm, individual physiological traits) and exogenous factors (e.g. oxygen availability). A surge of research interest continues to uncover the mechanistic basis of variability in metabolic rate [1], and metabolic rate is now one of the most widely measured physiological traits in animals [2]. In many aquatic animals, measurements of oxygen consumption rate (MO 2 ) provide a robust proxy for aerobic metabolic rates. Under static conditions, measurements of MO 2 are typically repeatable in individual animals, suggesting that metabolic rate may be an organismal trait [3], although the repeatability tends to decline over time [2].
Circadian rhythms in physiology and behaviour have evolved to allow animals to anticipate changes in the light-dark environment that are tied to the rotation of Earth. Circadian rhythms reflect endogenous rhythms that are self-sustained, unlike exogenous rhythms that depend on external factors, including changing light levels [4]. Circadian rhythms play a tremendous role in most organisms; ranging from decentralized regulation of the daily timing of mitosis [5] to influencing the migration of animals [6]. Circadian rhythms have been described in details in several teleost fishes [4,5,7,8]. For example, circadian rhythms influencing metabolic rate and behaviour have been documented in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus [9] and puffer fish Takifugu obscurus [10]. In contrast, in many primitive fishes, the influence of circadian rhythms on metabolism and behaviour remains largely unknown.
Standard metabolic rate (SMR) is a basic maintenance requirement measured as the minimum rate of oxygen consumption of postprandial unstressed animals at rest [11]. Long-term energy demands for swimming, food acquisition and treatment, regulation owing to environmental perturbation, and reproduction are additional to standard metabolism [11]. These demands are met within the range set by the maximum metabolic rate (MMR) [11].
Animal metabolic physiology is often influenced by exogenous factors, including environmental hypoxia. Hypoxia occurs in a wide range of aquatic systems [12], and the severity, frequency of occurrence, and spatial scale of hypoxia have increased in the last few decades, primarily due to anthropogenic activity [13,14]. There are two distinct metabolic responses to environmental hypoxia: 1) oxygen independent respiration in which the metabolic rate remains constant in spite of changing oxygen availability; and 2) oxygen dependent respiration in which the metabolic rate varies with oxygen availability [15]. The two responses are commonly termed oxygen regulation and oxygen conformity, respectively. The vast majority of literature suggests that most teleost fish are oxygen regulators [16][17][18][19][20], capable of maintaining both MMR and SMR down to certain oxygen thresholds [21,22]. In contrast, it remains controversial if oxygen regulation or conformity occurs in a number of primitive fishes exposed to hypoxia. For example, among members of the family Acipenseridae (sturgeons), previous studies have reported conflicting results stating that the metabolic rate remains constant or tends to increase [23][24][25][26] (i.e. oxygen regulator) or decrease [27][28][29][30] (i.e. oxygen conformer) when Acipenserids are exposed to environmental hypoxia. Using Adriatic sturgeon Acipenser naccarii, McKenzie et al. [31] suggested that swimming A. naccarii are oxygen regulators, whereas immobile A. naccarii are oxygen conformers. Knowing whether species are oxygen regulators or conformers is important to understand the capacity of fish to respond to environmental changes [20] and to assess assumptions for disparate metabolic theories in ecology [19].
Intraspecific variation in animal metabolic rate may correlate with endogenous factors, including behavioural or life history traits [32,33]. For example, Niitepõld and Hanski [34] found positive correlations between MMR and life span in a species of butterfly. In fish, MMR is typically measured in the laboratory using either a critical swimming protocol [35] or a chase protocol [36]. Using the latter protocol, Norin and Malte [3] reported that MMR is repeatable over several weeks. Assuming repeatability and heritability, MMR may represent a measure of organism performance [3], and it is possible that the trait is subjected to natural selection and could evolve over time. Little is known, however, about potential correlations between forced MMR (MMR F ; e.g. measured using the chase protocol) and spontaneous MMR (MMR S ) measured in volitionally performing fish. For example, is there a positive relationship between MMR F and MMR S such that an individual fish with an unexpectedly high MMR F also has an unexpectedly high MMR S ? Clarifying potential correlations between MMR F and MMR S is important, because from an evolutionary point of view, selection regimes may not always operate on a trait's maximal value, but rather on the spontaneous use of the trait [37,38]. If MMR F and MMR S are correlated, measurements of MMR F could function as a predictor of MMR S in individual fish.
Using juvenile lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens), we employed intermittent flow respirometry and video analysis to test four hypotheses: 1) A. fulvescens exhibit a circadian rhythm influencing metabolic rate and behavior; 2) A. fulvescens has the capacity to regulate metabolic rate when exposed to environmental hypoxia; 3) measurements of MMR F are repeatable in individual fish, and 4) MMR F is positively correlated with MMR S .
Our results reveal that the metabolic rate of A. fulvescens is influenced by a circadian rhythm, and A. fulvescens has the capacity to regulate SMR when exposed to environmental hypoxia, demonstrating oxygen regulation. In contrast, MMR F tends to decrease with increasing levels of hypoxia. Measurements of residual body mass corrected MMR F are repeatable in individual A. fulvescens; and residual body mass corrected MMR F and MMR S are correlated positively, but only in A. fulvescens exposed to an environmental stressor including hypoxia or 24 h of light.

Ethics statement
All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care Committee at the University of Manitoba, Canada (Approval ID: AUP-F11-004) under the guidelines of the Canadian Council of Animal Care. No animals were sacrificed, all efforts were taken to ameliorate animal suffering and undue stress, and there was no mortality during any of the tests.

Experimental animals
A total of 70 juvenile A. fulvescens (body mass: 30.5161.21 g (mean 6 S.E.); age: 1+; sex: unknown) obtained from Grand Rapids Fish Hatchery (Grand Rapids, MB, Canada) were kept at 1761uC in flow-through holding tanks at the University of Manitoba, Canada. The light regime was 12 h light: 12 h dark (12L:12D). A. fulvescens were fed daily using a mixture of bloodworm (San Francisco Bay Brand, Newark, CA, USA) and sinking trout pellet (Martin Mills Ltd., Elmira, ON, Canada).

Respirometry
Four static respirometers (each 0.83 l) and a mixing pump were submerged in a 100 l opaque tank, filled with freshwater maintained at 1760.1uC. Oxygen content (% air saturation; O 2sat ) of the water in the tank was controlled using two air stones combined with a stream of nitrogen bubbles [39]. Depending on the experiment, water in the tank was maintained at an oxygenation level between 100% and 30% O 2sat .
Respirometers were made of transparent glass tubing and were designed to allow a degree of spontaneous activity of A. fulvescens, including body undulations with tail excursions.90u relative to the body axis. Respirometers were situated in a sound isolated room with no other ongoing experiments to minimize any disturbance of the fish.
Measurements of MO 2 (mg O 2 h 21 ) were carried out every 9 min using computerized intermittent flow respirometry allowing long term (.48 h) repeated measurements [40]. Each respirometer was fitted with two outlet and two inlet ports as described previously [41]. The repeated respirometric loops consisted of a 4 min flushing phase during which a pump flushed the respirometer with ambient water through one set of ports. The second set of  ports and a pump secured re-circulation of water in the respirometer in a closed circuit phase for 5 min, divided into a waiting phase (2 min) and a measurement phase (3 min).
Oxygen partial pressure was measured at 1 Hz by a fiber optic sensor (Fibox 3 connected to a dipping probe; PreSens, Regensburg, Germany) located in the re-circulated loop. The flush pump was controlled by AutoResp software (version 2.1.3; Loligo Systems, Tjele, Denmark) that also calculated the MO 2 in the measurement phase using the oxygen partial pressure and standard equations [42,43]. Preliminary testing demonstrated that the duration of the measurement phase (3 min) ensured that the coefficient of determination (r 2 ) associated with each MO 2 measurement was always.0.95, similar to previous studies [44]. Corrections of background respiration (i.e. microbial respiration) followed Jones et al. [45].

Experimental protocols
A. fulvescens were selected randomly and fasted for 48 h to ensure a post absorptive state prior to experimentation. Subsequently, A. fulvescens were introduced to the respirometers and acclimated for 20 h. The light regime during the fasting and acclimation periods was 12L:12D, which included 0.5 h of gradually shifting light intensity from light to darkness and vice versa. Light intensities were 3.0 and 0.0 mmol s 21 m 22 in daylight and darkness, respectively. Starting at 16:00 h on the next day, MO 2 data were collected for the following 24 h.
Measurements of MO 2 over 24 h comprised three test groups: 1) control (100% O 2sat ; 12L:12D); 2) treatment A (30% O 2sat ; 12L:12D); and 3) treatment B (100% O 2sat ; 24L). The oxygen content in treatment A (30% O 2sat ) corresponded to approximately 6.2 kPa. Data collection for the three test groups was carried out in a random fashion and each test group included 10-12 individuals. After each 24 h trial, MMR F was measured as described below.

Standard metabolic rate (SMR) and maximum metabolic rates (MMR F and MMR S )
For each test group, SMR in individual fish was estimated as the average of the lowest 10 MO 2 values collected over 24 h. This method to estimate SMR was employed because it provides measurements that are repeatable in individual fish [3].
MMR F was measured immediately after each 24 h trial at the corresponding O 2sat level (i.e. 100% or 30% O 2sat ) inside the respirometer. MMR F was elicited using a standard chase protocol [36]. Briefly, individual A. fulvescens were transferred to a circular trough and chased to exhaustion, similar to previous studies on Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrhynchus) and shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) [46]. Upon exhaustion, identified by no further response after 5 min of manual stimulation, A. fulvescens were transferred (,20 s) to the respirometer where MO 2 measurements started immediately. MMR F was the highest of three consecutive MO 2 measurements.
In addition, following the same chase protocol, MMR F was measured in 36 A. fulvescens exposed to 100%, 90%, 80% or 70% O 2sat inside the respirometer. A total of 8-12 A. fulvescens were tested at each of the four O 2sat levels. Measurements of MMR F in 100% O 2sat were repeated after 4.5 h to examine the short term repeatability of MMR F in individual fish. These two measurements were termed initial and final MMR F .
Finally, for each test group (i.e. control and treatments A and B), MMR S was estimated as the single highest measurement of MO 2 (i.e. one respirometric loop) in volitionally performing individual fish during the complete 24 h trial (i.e. after acclimation). These data were used to test for correlations between MMR F and MMR S in individual fish (see Data analysis).

Behaviour
A. fulvescens in the respirometers were recorded (25 frames s 21 ) dorsally using a UEye camera (model UI-1640SE-C-GL; IDS, Woburn, MA, USA) equipped with a CCTV lens (model HF6M-2; Spacecom, Whittier, CA, USA). The software UEye Cockpit (version 3.90; IDS, Woburn, MA, USA) was used to download recordings to a PC. Two Scene illuminators (model S8030-30-C-IR; Guangdong, China) provided infra-red light for nocturnal recordings. All recordings were synchronized with the respirometric loops (to the nearest 1 s). For each A. fulvescens, behavioural data were collected over a 45 s time interval during the measurement phase of the respirometric loop (i.e. once every 9 min.). Behavioural data included total activity (i.e. % of time moving),

Data analysis
MO 2 data were body mass adjusted following previous studies [47]. Metabolic rates from the three test groups were calculated over 1 h intervals [48], with two exceptions, because the light intensity was gradually changing over 0.5 h periods at 21 h and 9 h. Therefore, the two 1 h intervals associated with 21 h and 9 h were each divided into two: 0.5 h with changing light intensities and 0.5 h with constant light intensity. The compiled data were used to compare metabolic rates over 24 h within the three test groups (i.e. control and treatments A and B). Behavioural data were compiled in the same fashion.
Metabolic and behavioural variables were compared within each test group across the time interval from 16:00 to 23:00 h using a repeated measure (RM) one way ANOVA. Relationships between behaviour and metabolic rates were investigated using least squares linear regression.
To test for metabolic differences, SMR, MMR F and MMR S measurements were compared between the three test groups using a one way ANOVA. MMR F data from the four oxygen treatments (100 -70% O 2sat ) were analyzed using least square linear regression to examine the effect of decreasing oxygen levels on MMR F . The method recommended by Norin and Malte [3] was used to examine repeatability of the MMR F measurements. All values of MMR F and body mass were log 10 -transformed prior to the analysis. Mass-independent data of MMR F were expressed as residual values using the relationship between body mass and MMR F . Fish with higher than expected MMR F have positive residuals and fish with lower than expected MMR F have negative residuals. Repeatability of the two sets of residuals (initial and final) was estimated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) [3].
Using metabolic rate data from the three test groups, MMR S of each individual fish was extracted to test for correlations between individual MMR F and MMR S . The comparison of individual  MMR F and MMR S was carried out in the same fashion as the repeatability analysis described above.
Log 10 transformations of data prior to statistical analysis were employed to meet assumptions of normal distribution of data and homogeneity of variance. If the assumptions were met, ANOVA or RM ANOVA were employed depending on design as described above. If significant, the tests were followed by pairwise multiple comparisons using the Holm-Sidak method.
If data transformations did not permit the use of parametric testing, ANOVA on ranks or RM ANOVA on ranks (Friedman) were employed depending on design as described above. The tests were followed by pairwise multiple comparisons using Dunn's method to take unequal sample sizes into account.
Tests were carried out using SigmaStat 3.01 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA) and SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Results were considered significant if a,0.05. All values are reported as means 6 S.E. unless noted otherwise.

Results
For all the experiments, there were no indications that the health status of the test animals changed during any of the tests.

Body mass adjustments
There were no differences between test groups (i.e. control, treatments A and B) in terms of body mass and SMR measured as mg O 2 h 21 (both P.0.05). Consequently, SMR data were pooled, and the relationship between log 10 SMR and log 10 body mass was described using a linear equation [3,47]. The slope of the relationship was 1.0060.12 indicating that a 1.0 body mass scaling coefficient was appropriate for the SMR data. A 1.0 body mass scaling coefficient is consistent with two previous studies on green sturgeon Acipenser medirostris [47,49]. Because the 1.0 body mass scaling coefficient was appropriate for the SMR data, the same coefficient was used for the MO 2 data collected over time (Fig. 1). MMR F measured as mg O 2 h 21 did not differ between the control group and treatment B (P.0.05), but MMR F from treatment A was lower than both the control group and treatment B (P,0.001). To examine the relationship between body mass and MMR F (mg O 2 h 21 ), data collected in normoxia were combined and the relationship between log 10 MMR F and log 10 body mass was described using a linear equation [3,47]. The slope of the relationship was 0.9060.05 indicating that a 0.9 body mass scaling coefficient was appropriate for the MMR F data. Consequently, all MMR F data were standardized to the mean body mass of 30.5 g using 0.9 as the body mass scaling coefficient. In the following, MMR F standardized to 30.5 g is denoted MMR F30.5 .

Metabolic rates over 24 h
Metabolic rates varied substantially over the 24 h periods (Fig. 1). In the control group, metabolic rate increased significantly (P,0.001) from 112 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 at 20:00 h to reach a maximum of 237 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 when the light went off (Fig. 1,  control), indicating a dusk metabolic peak. Thereafter, metabolic rate decreased and reached 157 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 shortly before daylight. The metabolic rate decreased further in daylight and reached 112 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 after 3 h.
In treatment A, metabolic rate increased significantly (P,0.05) from 116 to 150 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 when the light went off (Fig. 1,  treatment A). Although truncated, this metabolic peak corresponded to the dusk metabolic peak observed in the control test group. Thereafter, metabolic rate decreased to 128 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 at 03:00 h, and then increased to reach 139 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 during the period with increasing light intensity (09:00 h). Thus, treatment A indicated two metabolic peaks; one associated with dusk and one associated with dawn. After the light went on, the metabolic rate changed little for 1 h and then decreased to 118 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 (Fig. 1, treatment A). In treatment B, the metabolic rate remained below 119 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 until 02:00 h (Fig. 1, treatment B). Data showed that the dusk metabolic peak, observed in the control group and in treatment A, was eliminated by the constant light (P = 0.64). In contrast, in treatment B, the metabolic rate tended to increase at 02:00 h and continued doing so until it reached 178 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 at 08:00 h (Fig. 1, treatment B). These data indicated the presence of a darkness independent increase in the metabolic rate. The increasing metabolic rate peaked around dawn, just before the light would normally come on.
Collectively, data indicated the presence of two metabolic peaks occurring over 24 h. The first metabolic peak occurred around dusk and was noticeable in the control group and treatment A (Fig. 1). The second metabolic peak occurred around dawn and was noticeable in treatments A and B (Fig. 1).

Behaviour across the light-dark transition
Behavioural recordings from the control group indicated that the total activity increased in darkness (Fig. 2, control), but no statistically significant differences were identified over time (P.0.05). Similarly, the frequency of body undulations with tail excursions,90u did not change significantly over time (P.0.05). In contrast, body undulations with tail excursions.90u increased significantly over time (P,0.001) (Fig. 2, control).
Data from treatment A revealed no significant changes in the total activity over time or in the frequency of body undulations with tail excursions,90u (both P.0.05) (Fig. 2, treatment A). In contrast, the frequency of body undulations with tail excursions.90u increased significantly over time (P,0.001).
Data from treatment B revealed no significant changes over time in the total activity or in the frequencies of body undulations with tail excursions,90u or .90u (all P.0.05; Fig. 2, treatment B).

Correlations between behaviour and metabolic rate
The behavioural data suggested that the frequency of body undulations with tail excursions.90u (Fig. 2) could be a major driver of the increase in metabolic rate associated with dusk (Fig. 1). Regression analysis revealed highly significant (P,0.001 in all cases) linear relationships between the frequency of body undulations with tail excursions.90u and metabolic rate (Fig. 3). The coefficients of determination (r 2 ) for the relationships varied between test groups and were 0.68, 0.64 and 0.15 for control and treatments A and B, respectively (Fig. 3). These data suggest that metabolic variation was coupled with behavioural variation.
Environmental effects on standard metabolic rate (SMR) and forced maximum metabolic rate (MMR F ) SMR was unaffected by hypoxia (treatment A) and constant light (treatment B) (P.0.05; Table 1), and the pooled average was 92.3962.00 mg O 2 kg 21 h 21 . Corresponding analyses of MMR F30.5 revealed no differences between the control and treatment B (P.0.05), whereas MMR F30.5 from treatment A was lower than both the control and treatment B (P,0.001; Table 1). These findings showed that 30% O 2sat reduced MMR F30.5 . MMR F30.5 was quantified in four separate groups of A. fulvescens exposed to 100%, 90%, 80% or 70% O 2sat to estimate the effect of hypoxia on MMR F30.5 . Body mass did not differ between the four treatments (P = 0.95). MMR F30.5 was affected by hypoxia and decreased across the range from 100% O 2sat to 70% O 2sat (Fig. 4) as revealed by the linear regression analysis (P,0.03; r 2 .0.94). These findings indicated that the maximum metabolic rate of A. fulvescens is sensitive to increasing levels of hypoxia.

Repeatability of forced maximum metabolic rates (MMR F )
Analysis of repeatability followed a previous study [3] and showed that measurements of residual body mass corrected MMR F are repeatable in individual fish. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) for the relationship between the initial and final residual MMR F was 0.76, and the relationship was highly significant (P,0.006) (Fig. 5).
Spontaneous maximum metabolic rate (MMR S ) MMR S was extracted from each 24 h trial for comparisons between test groups. MMR S differed significantly between all three test groups (P,0.05) ( Table 1). These findings showed that MMR S was suppressed in treatments A and B, with the most pronounced effect in treatment A (Table 1). Standardizing MMR S to a 30.5 g fish using a 0.9 body mass scaling coefficient (i.e. equivalent to MMR F30.5 ) changed MMR S values by , 1% and had no impact on the conclusions.
Correlations between forced (MMR F ) and spontaneous (MMR S ) maximum metabolic rates MMR F and MMR S were compared to test the hypothesis that they would correlate positively. Data showed that residual MMR F and residual MMR S were not correlated in the control group (P = 0.40; r = 0.27) (Fig. 6, control). In contrast, residual MMR F and residual MMR S were positively correlated in both treatments A (P,0.05; r = 0.69) and B (P,0.05; r = 0.66) (Fig. 6, treatments  A and B). These data indicated that an individual with an unexpectedly high MMR F also has an unexpectedly high MMR S , at least when the individual is exposed to an environmental stressor, such as hypoxia (treatment A) or constant light (treatment B).

Discussion
This study provides evidence that the organismal physiology of A. fulvescens is influenced by a circadian rhythm and strongly indicates that A. fulvescens is an oxygen regulator. Using residual (i.e. body mass corrected) values, the study suggests that MMR F is repeatable in individual A. fulvescens, and MMR F can be positively correlated with MMR S . The relationship between MMR F and MMR S appears, however, to depend on the presence of an environmental stressor such as hypoxia or constant light.
Our data indicated the presence of two metabolic peaks in A. fulvescens occurring over 24 h (Fig. 1). The first metabolic peak occurred around dusk (control group and treatment A), whereas the second metabolic peak occurred around dawn (treatments A and B) (Fig. 1). The dusk metabolic peak was eliminated by the constant light in treatment B, suggesting that the dusk metabolic peak reflected an exogenous rhythm, depending on exogenous stimuli (i.e. decreasing light levels). In contrast, the dawn metabolic peak occurred regardless of constant light, suggesting that a circadian rhythm, including an endogenous mechanistic basis, control the metabolic rate of A. fulvescens. As far as is known, our study provides the first evidence of a circadian rhythm in Acipenserids. It is not clear why the dawn metabolic peak was not distinct in the control group (Fig. 1). We suggest that the relatively high metabolic rates masked the dawn metabolic peak in the control group. In the hypoxic treatment, metabolic rates were suppressed, but not to an extent where the dawn metabolic peak was eliminated (Fig. 1). Therefore, the metabolic suppression in hypoxia helped revealing the underlying presence of two metabolic peaks.
In a recent field study, Forsythe et al. [50] reported that adult A. fulvescens initiate upstream migration around dusk and dawn. The authors suggested that the observations could ultimately be explained by reduced risk of predation and harvest by humans at dusk and dawn [50]. While the present study used juvenile A. fulvescens, our data indicate that the migratory peaks at dusk and dawn observed by Forsythe et al. [50] could reflect proximate mechanisms that include an exogenous rhythm at dusk and a circadian rhythm at dawn.
This study tested the hypothesis that A. fulvescens is an oxygen regulator. Our data provide two lines of evidence that A. fulvescens is an oxygen regulator, capable of regulating metabolic rate and maintaining metabolic rhythms in environmental hypoxia. Firstly, we found no evidence that SMR differed between normoxia and hypoxia (30% O 2sat ) ( Table 1). Thus, A. fulvescens maintained SMR regardless of fluctuating environmental oxygen levels. Secondly, A. fulvescens exposed to hypoxia (30% O 2sat ) exhibited a similar metabolic rate rhythm over the time interval from 16 h to 23 h as A. fulvescens exposed to normoxia and was capable of increasing the metabolic rate around dusk in the hypoxic environment (Fig. 1, treatment A). The metabolic increase had a strong behavioural component in both hypoxia and normoxia, and correlated positively with the frequency of body undulations with tail excursions.90u (Fig. 3). These data show that A. fulvescens is capable of regulating metabolic rate (SMR) and maintaining metabolic rhythms in hypoxia. Thus, A. fulvescens is an oxygen regulator, like most teleost fishes.
In contrast to SMR, data indicated that MMR F30.5 is sensitive to increasing levels of hypoxia in A. fulvescens (Fig. 4). Physiologically, the result is expected because if a fish is exercising at MMR before the hypoxic exposure, compensatory mechanisms (e.g. increasing gill ventilation and cardiac output) are already utilized to support the elevated oxygen requirements and are unavailable to compensate for environmental hypoxia. The result is not, however, consistent with previous studies on teleost fish. Most previous studies have reported that the maximum metabolic rate in normoxia is maintained in low levels of hypoxia [21,22,41], typically down to approximately 80% O 2sat . The reason for the discrepancy between the present and previous studies remains unknown, but is it possible the maximum metabolic rate of A. fulvescens is more sensitive to low levels of hypoxia than in most teleost fishes. Further tests comparing Acipenserids and teleost fishes using identical equipment and experimental approaches are required to examine the discrepancy.
Previous studies have demonstrated that SMR and MMR are repeatable physiological traits in a wide range of taxa [2]. Repeatability (or temporal consistency) is important when ascribing certain properties to an individual animal on the basis of a single physiological measurement [3]. Repeatability indexes the reliability of the protocol used to measure a trait [51] and further sets a general upper limit to the intensity of selection that can be applied to the trait [52]. If a trait is not repeatable over time, a single measure of the trait may not be representative of future physiological performance and it becomes unlikely that natural selection can act on the trait, i.e. separate the favoured from disfavoured individuals [53]. Little is known about repeatability of traits in Acipenserids, but a recent behavioural study [54] demonstrated that spawning times and locations are highly repeatable in mature A. fulvescens. To our knowledge, the present study provides the first estimate of physiological repeatability in Acipenserids. Our data suggest that body mass corrected measurements of MMR F are repeatable in A. fulvescens (Fig. 5), at least over short time intervals (4.5 h) and set the stage for studies examining repeatability over longer time intervals.
Recently, it has been shown that not only SMR and MMR, but also routine metabolic rate (RMR) can be a repeatable trait in fish [55]. Repeatability of RMR suggests that the spontaneous activity within a respirometer is not simply random bouts of movement over time, but rather, that individual fish exhibit consistent behavioural patterns when evaluated at different times [55]. The present study tested whether body mass corrected values of MMR F and MMR S are positively correlated to examine whether an unexpectedly high value of MMR F would indicate an unexpectedly high value of MMR S . By demonstrating positive relationships between MMR F and MMR S in A. fulvescens exposed to an environmental stressor (Fig. 6), the present study adds to the growing body of evidence indicating that variation in metabolism, as determined over time in a respirometer, is not random, but may reflect physiological or behavioural traits in individual animals.
Measurements of physiological performance, including MMR F and critical swimming speed (U crit ), are widely used wholeorganism indicators of maximal performance, examined to better understand evolutionary and physiological ecology [3,53,[56][57][58][59][60][61]. While maximal performance is crucial for a wide range of behaviours tightly connected to fitness (e.g. [62,63]), animals may not exercise at maximal intensity very often [64][65][66]. Therefore, measurements of maximal performance could have more pronounced functional importance if maximal performance correlated positively with spontaneous performance, which is used more frequently. In particular, this is important because selection regimes may not only operate on a trait's maximal value, but alternatively on the spontaneous use of the trait (i.e. ecological performance [37,38]). In the present study, we examined maximal forced and spontaneous performances by measuring MMR F and MMR S to test whether the two traits are correlated. Considering treatments A and B, data indicated that A. fulvescens exhibiting an unexpectedly high MMR F also exhibit an unexpectedly high MMR S (Fig. 6). These data suggest that MMR F may be indicative of MMR S in individual A. fulvescens. Nevertheless, we only found relationships between MMR F and MMR S when fish were exposed to an environmental stressor (hypoxia or 24 h light), and no relationship when fish were exposed to normoxia and a normal light regime (12L:12D) (Fig. 6).
It remains unclear why we observed relationships between MMR F and MMR S when A. fulvescens were exposed to an environmental stressor, and no relationship without an environmental stressor (Fig. 6). Our findings are, however, consistent with a recent review by Killen et al. [1]. The authors described how environmental stressors, including hypoxia and light, may either reveal or mask relationships between behaviour and physiology. Because we found evidence of correlations between behaviour and metabolic rate (Fig. 3), it is likely that MMR S not only reflected a physiological trait, but also a behavioural trait. As such, our relationships between MMR F and MMR S (Fig. 6) could be considered relationships between physiology and behaviour that were revealed by environmental stressors, as suggested by Killen et al. [1]. All our measurements of MMR F were stressful for A. fulvescens [46,67], whereas the measurements of MMR S were probably most stressful under hypoxia and constant light. Physiological stress is associated with increased concentrations of plasma cortisol in Acipenserids [67][68][69] with secondary responses involving metabolism [70]. In the present study, MMR S was suppressed in treatments A and B (Table 1), and stress experienced by A. fulvescens under hypoxia and constant light could have influenced the relative distribution of phenotypes with regard to MMR S , such that positive correlations between MMR F and MMR S were revealed in treatments A and B (see Fig. 1 in Killen et al. [1]). This remains speculation, however, and further studies of the coupling between behaviour and physiology in divergent environments are needed to evaluate the hypothesis.