Promoter-Wide Hypermethylation of the Ribosomal RNA Gene Promoter in the Suicide Brain

Background Alterations in gene expression in the suicide brain have been reported and for several genes DNA methylation as an epigenetic regulator is thought to play a role. rRNA genes, that encode ribosomal RNA, are the backbone of the protein synthesis machinery and levels of rRNA gene promoter methylation determine rRNA transcription. Methodology/Principal Findings We test here by sodium bisulfite mapping of the rRNA promoter and quantitative real-time PCR of rRNA expression the hypothesis that epigenetic differences in critical loci in the brain are involved in the pathophysiology of suicide. Suicide subjects in this study were selected for a history of early childhood neglect/abuse, which is associated with decreased hippocampal volume and cognitive impairments. rRNA was significantly hypermethylated throughout the promoter and 5′ regulatory region in the brain of suicide subjects, consistent with reduced rRNA expression in the hippocampus. This difference in rRNA methylation was not evident in the cerebellum and occurred in the absence of genome-wide changes in methylation, as assessed by nearest neighbor. Conclusions/Significance This is the first study to show aberrant regulation of the protein synthesis machinery in the suicide brain. The data implicate the epigenetic modulation of rRNA in the pathophysiology of suicide.


Introduction
Suicide is a leading cause of death, particularly in males [1,2]. Although many suicide subjects have a diagnosable psychiatric illness, most persons with a psychiatric disorder never attempt suicide [2]. Suicidal behavior aggregates in families [1], and studies of twins show that monozygotic individuals have a greater concordance for suicide completion and suicide attempts compared to dizygotic individuals [2][3][4]. Non-genetic familial factors, including a history of abuse or neglect during childhood, are also risk factors for suicidal behavior [5,6]. Similarly, childhood abuse is associated with an increased risk for psychopathology [7,8] and altered neural development [9].
Several lines of evidence suggest that changes in gene expression in the brain occur in the context of psychiatric disorders and suicide [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Alterations in gene regulation can be caused by epigenetic programming of gene expression in response to environmental exposure, including social and physical adversity [16]. The genome is epigenetically programmed by changes in the chromatin state and by a pattern of modification of the DNA molecule itself through methylation [17]. DNA methylation is a stable epigenetic mark associated with long-lasting silencing of gene expression [18]. In rodents, genes responsive to differences in the quality of maternal care early in life are altered through epigenetic mechanisms [19,20]. In the human brain, aberrant DNA methylation of specific genes also occurs in the context of psychiatric disorders [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Decreased expression of ribosomal RNA (rRNA), a bottleneck gene for protein production in the cell, occurs in patients with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease [27,28].
DNA methylation can regulate gene expression in two ways. One is site-specific methylation, involving direct interference with the binding of transcription factors [29]. The second is siteindependent promoter-wide methylation, attracting methylated DNA binding proteins and leading to an inactive chromatin structure. In the latter case, the density of methylated CpGs determines the extent of gene silencing [30]. Both mechanisms can regulate rRNA expression. Previous work in cultured mouse cells indicated that rRNA is regulated by methylation of a single CpG dinucleotide at position 2133 residing at the upstream control element (UCE) [31]. In human cell culture, the transcriptionally active fraction of rRNA promoters associated with RNA polymerase I (pol I) is completely unmethylated whereas the fraction not associated with pol I is almost completely methylated [32], thus determining transcription by defining the fraction of unmethylated rRNA. Mouse and human rRNA promoters show different CpG densities in the core promoter and UCE (3 in the mouse and 26-28 in the human [31,33]). Thus, although in both species complete methylation of CpGs in the promoters characterizes inactive alleles, the number of CpGs involved is different suggesting a different mode of regulation by DNA methylation.
In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that rRNA in the human hippocampus of suicide subjects with a history of childhood abuse or severe neglect and controls who died suddenly of unrelated causes without a history of childhood abuse or severe neglect is differentially methylated and expressed. Within the genome there are over 400 copies of the rRNA gene, encoding a large pre-rRNA transcriptional unit (45S) whose expression is tightly regulated by methylation [31][32][33][34]. We particularly examined the core promoter region and UCE of rRNA because it is involved in the regulation of all pol I transcribed copies of rRNA by methylation [33]. Our strategy was to sample the average methylation pattern of the rRNA promoter at single nucleotide resolution to determine CpG site specificity in the regulation of rRNA gene expression in the brains of suicide subjects and controls. The results implicate the epigenetic modulation of rRNA in the pathophysiology of suicide.

Results
The subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. There were no significant differences in post-mortem interval (PMI), brain pH, or age between suicide subjects and controls (P's.0.05).

Genotyping of the rRNA promoter
Because alterations in rRNA function may occur due to both genetic and epigenetic differences, the rRNA promoter region from each suicide subject and control was sequenced. No sequence variants were seen among subjects ( Fig. 1; also see Fig. S1). When the sequence was compared to the published reference sequence for the rRNA promoter region (Genebank accession number: U13369) a few discrepancies were discovered. Notably, two CpG dinucleotides were not found in the sequenced DNA ( Fig. 1). One CpG dinucleotide between the CpG dinucleotides in positions 2108 and 2103 was simply absent, and a second just upstream of the CpG dinucleotide in position 23 was found to be a C/T nucleotide substitution. Thus, of the 28 CpG dinucleotides in the published sequence, 26 CpG dinucleotides were present in the samples. As all subjects in our study were of French-Canadian origin, a population with a well established founder effect [35], it is The values are mean 6 SD. 1 The number of subjects in each group represents the total number of subjects used for methylation and expression analysis. Additional subjects used for expression analysis did not differ from the other subjects in any of the listed measures (see Materials and Methods for details; P's.0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002085.t001 Figure 1. Genotyping of the rRNA promoter. The rRNA promoter sequence was identical for all suicide subjects and controls. The sequence derived from genotyping is shown above the published rRNA sequence, indicating consensus sequences for primers used for sodium bisulfite mapping (underline) and CpG dinucleotides (bold font), with locations marked relative to the transcription start site (arrow). Differences with the published rRNA sequence, U13369, are highlighted in grey, and the base pair length of each sequence is listed on the right side. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002085.g001 likely that these differences reflect population-specific variants with regards to the reference sequence. For each subject, sequences overlapping the region targeted by primers after bisulfite conversion were identical to the published sequence, except for the presence of a G/T conversion in the forward primer that was present in all subjects, thus eliminating potential primer bias between subjects in sodium bisulfite mapping.
The rRNA Promoter is Hypermethylated in the Hippocampus of Suicide Subjects DNA methylation can affect expression via specific methylation of distinct CpG sites [29] and/or via regional site-independent changes in the overall density of methylation [30]. Previous work in cell culture on the state of human rRNA promoter methylation showed regional differences in methylation between active and inactive rRNA promoters [32]. To determine whether the pattern of methylation of single nucleotides and/or the overall methylation of rRNA differed between suicide subjects and controls, the rRNA promoter was examined at single nucleotide resolution by sodium bisulfite mapping (Fig. 2). The rRNA promoter was heavily methylated throughout the promoter and 59 regulatory region in the hippocampus of suicide subjects in comparison with that of controls (F(1) = 191.04, P,0.0001, Fig. 2, 3A). Twenty-one out of 26 CpG sites were significantly more methylated in suicide subjects compared to controls, whereas no CpG was more methylated in controls relative to suicide subjects (F(25) = 11.01, P,0.001; Fig. 3A). An analysis of the effect size for each CpG site revealed that these 21 sites did not differ in the magnitude of the methylation difference between groups at each CpG site (P's.0.05). A greater number of sequenced clones were hypermethylated in the suicide subjects, whereas control subjects showed a greater number of hypomethylated clones (Fig. 3B). An analysis of the regression slopes between groups revealed a significant (F(1) = 7.33, P,0.01) interaction between the number of methylated CpG sites per clone for suicide subjects compared to controls. These data indicate a dramatic increase in the ratio of methylated to unmethylated clones among suicide subjects across most CpG sites.
To determine whether the state of methylation of specific CpG methylation sites differed across the rRNA promoter between suicide subjects and controls or whether all CpG sites differed similarly between the two groups, the relationship between groups of the average percentage of methylation for each CpG site was investigated. There was a strong linear relationship between the means of the two groups (R = 0.92, P,0.00001; Fig. 4) demonstrating a similar difference in the state of methylation of all CpG sites in between the groups. No single CpG site stood out as being particularly different between the groups suggesting no site selectivity of methylation in the rRNA of suicide subjects. Instead, the overall level of methylation throughout the promoter and regulatory region differed between the groups. These data showing a lack of sitespecificity are consistent with our recent analysis of the state of methylation of rRNA genes in cultured cells [32].

Specificity of Hippocampal rRNA methylation by Analysis of Cerebellum rRNA and Genome-Wide Methylation
To examine the anatomical specificity of the differences in rRNA methylation between suicides and controls in the hippocampus, rRNA promoter methylation was examined in the cerebellum, a region not primarily associated with psychopathology. Individuals from the suicide subjects group who showed large differences in hippocampal rRNA promoter methylation by contrast to those in the control group (t(6) = 4.12, P,0.01; Fig. 5A) were selected to test whether these differences would be conserved in another brain region. In contrast to the hippocampus, there was no significant difference in the percentage of methylated CpG sites between suicide subjects and controls in the cerebellum (t(6) = 0.55, P = 0.6; Fig. 5B). There was no significant correlation between levels of methylation in the hippocampus and those in the cerebellum (R = 0.11, P = 0.78), showing anatomical specificity in the hypermethylation of the rRNA promoter in hippocampus of suicide subjects. The interaction between the regression slopes for the number of methylated CpG sites per clone was not significant (F(1) = 0.26, P = 0.61; Fig. 5C), indicating that there was no difference in the ratio of unmethylated to methylated clones between groups in the cerebellum. To determine whether the observed differences in methylation of the rRNA promoter in the hippocampus reflect genome-wide differences in methylation between suicide subjects and controls, nearest neighbor analysis of the overall percentage of methylated cytosines was performed for each subject. Nearest neighbor analysis revealed no significant difference between suicide subjects and controls in the overall percentage of methylated cytosines (t(22) = 0.54, P = 0.59), and there was no significant correlation between the percentage of rRNA promoter methylation and genome-wide methylation (R = 0.07, P = 0.78), revealing specificity in the regulation of the rRNA promoter by methylation in the suicide brain (Fig. 5D).

rRNA Methylation Does Not Vary With Psychiatric Diagnoses
Next, the relationship between methylation and psychiatric diagnoses was examined ( Table 1). Mood disorders and substance abuse disorders are risk factors for suicide and have also been linked to alterations of DNA methylation in several genes [24,25,36,37]. There were no significant differences within the suicide subjects or the controls when the overall percentages of rRNA methylation of those with mood disorders were compared to those without mood disorders as well as among those with substance abuse disorders compared to those without substance abuse disorders (all P's.0.05).

rRNA Expression is Downregulated in Suicide
Because it has been established in cell culture that methylation of the rRNA promoter regulates the transcription of rRNA [31][32][33][34], rRNA expression in suicide subjects and controls was investigated. rRNA expression was significantly higher in controls than in suicide subjects (t(23) = 2.16, P,0.05; Fig. 6A). Correlational analysis revealed a trend for a relationship between the overall percentage of methylation and rRNA expression (R = 20.21, P.0.05; Fig. 6B), indicating that rRNA expression may be regulated by methylation and additional epigenetic factors. There was no relationship between and PMI, brain pH, or age and rRNA expression (P's.0.05).

Discussion
The data reveal evidence for DNA hypermethylation of the rRNA promoter region in the hippocampus of suicide subjects with histories of childhood abuse or severe neglect relative to controls (victims of sudden, accidental death with no history of abuse or neglect). Although our findings are largely based on correlational studies indicating an association between psychopathology and methylation, these data are consistent with growing evidence suggesting that alterations in cytosine methylation mediate biological processes associated with psychopathology [38].
Since DNA methylation is a highly stable mark, the bond between a methyl group and cytosine ring being one of the most stable chemical bonds [18], the differences in methylation are unlikely to be a consequence of conditions immediately preceding death or during the postmortem interval. No reaction which could spontaneously demethylate 5-methylcytosine in DNA has ever been described. Our data indicate that post mortem pH does not affect DNA methylation (CE POM VD MJM MS and GT, unpublished observations). Indeed, post-mortem interval, brain pH, or age did not differ between suicide subjects and controls.
The increase in hippocampal rRNA promoter methylation among suicide subjects appears to occur in the absence of obvious site-specific effects on particular CpG sites. The results are consistent with data in cell culture showing that transcriptionally active rRNA promoters are completely unmethylated while transcriptionally inactive molecules are completely methylated in a promoter-wide manner without any obvious site selectivity [32]. In contrast to the situation in humans reported here and previously reported in human cells in culture, the situation in mouse is different. In the mouse, a site-specific change in methylation is sufficient to mediate silencing of the rRNA promoter [31].
Importantly, the changes in rRNA promoter methylation do not reflect a genome-wide change in methylation, as nearest neighbor analysis revealed no differences in overall levels of methylation in suicide subjects relative to controls. Moreover, this difference in the methylation of the rRNA promoter shows anatomical specificity. When the rRNA methylation status for subjects with large methylation differences in hippocampus was assessed in the cerebellum, suicide subjects and controls showed similar levels of rRNA methylation. In contrast to the hippocampus, the number of methylated CpG sites observed per clone was similar between suicide subjects and controls in the cerebellum. As a part of the brain not primarily associated with neuroplastic changes influencing psychopathology, this result indicates that rRNA methylation differences between the groups are specific to the hippocampus.
In addition to the difference in methylation, suicide subjects showed impaired hippocampal rRNA expression compared to controls. The decrease in gene expression was associated with increased methylation of the rRNA promoter sequence, as indicated by a trend for a linear correlation between the overall percentage of methylation and gene expression. Although a trend was evident, the results do not exclude other known epigenetic mechanisms influencing rRNA gene expression. For example, in cultured cells pharmacological manipulation of the acetylation status of histone 4 influences rRNA expression [31,39].
In this study, we selected suicide subjects with a history of early childhood neglect/abuse. Childhood abuse in humans is associated with decreased hippocampal volume, as well as with cognitive impairments [9]. This influence of childhood adversity and epigenetic aberrations later in life supports the hypothesis that, similar to what was observed in rodents [19,20,40], early childhood events in humans alter epigenetic markings in the brain. It is tempting to speculate that epigenetic processes mediate effects of social adversity during childhood on the brain that persist into adulthood and are known to enhance suicide risk [41,42].
Epigenetic differences might be driven by genetic differences as well as by other environmental and dietary factors. All suicide subjects in our study displayed the same genomic sequence in the rRNA promoter region examined. Additional genetic polymorphisms in other regions of the rRNA gene, including among individual rRNA gene clusters, may play a role in rRNA function. The structure and length of rRNA gene clusters varies between individuals [43,44], however, the relationship between rRNA promoter methylation or rRNA expression and this additional level of organizational complexity in rRNA is less clear. Genetic abnormalities in rRNA gene cluster organization are associated with increased rRNA methylation during cellular senescence [45]. However, the lack of difference between groups in the cerebellum argues against such genetic differences among these individuals. Another factor that may influence the methylation status of individuals is medication prescribed in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The mood stabilizing effect of sodium valproate, a potent histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor known to indirectly influence DNA methylation [46,47] via chromatin modification and used in the treatment of bipolar disorder, and the noted antidepressive effect of S-adenosyl methionine, a methyl donor in the DNA methylation reaction and an inhibitor of active demethylation [48] , suggest a role for DNA methylation in mood regulation [49]. Although none of the subjects in the present study had been treated with these pharmacological agents, the possibility of epigenetic regulation by other pharmacological interventions should not be discounted. Our data do not exclude these alternative hypotheses. In summary, these data reveal increased promoter-wide methylation of the rRNA promoter as well as decreased rRNA gene expression in suicide subjects. The results of the psychological autopsy suggest a developmental origin, however, at time this is speculation based on samples that differ along a wide range of experiential and potentially genetic dimensions. To date, our data are merely consistent with the hypothesis that early life events can alter the epigenetic status of genes that mediate neural functions, and thus contribute to individual differences in the risk for suicide.

Subjects and Sample Preparation
Hippocampal samples obtained from the Quebec Suicide Brain Bank included: 13 suicide subjects and 11 controls matched for post-mortem interval (PMI), gender, and age ( Table 1). Cerebellar samples were also obtained for 4 of the same suicide subjects and 4 of the same controls as those used for hippocampal analysis. An additional 6 hippocampal samples consisting of 5 suicide subjects and 1 control were also obtained from the Quebec Suicide Brain Bank for RNA expression analysis, to compensate for the removal of 5 subjects (2 suicide and 3 controls) due to low RNA quality. All samples were from male suicide and control subjects of French-Canadian origin that were processed as previously described [50]. Samples were dissected at 4uC and stored in plastic vials at 280uC until analysis. All samples were processed and analyzed blind to demographic and diagnostic variables. Possible confounders that were examined included PMI, brain pH, and age at death of the donor ( Table 1). This study was approved by our local Institutional Review Board and signed informed consent was obtained from next of kin.
To be included in this study, all subjects had to die suddenly, with no medical or paramedic intervention. Suicide as the cause of death was determined by the Quebec Coroner's Office. Psychiatric diagnoses were obtained by means of the SCID I [51] and SCID II [52] interviews adapted for psychological autopsies, which is a validated method to reconstruct psychiatric history by means of extensive proxy-based interviews, as outlined elsewhere [41]. In addition, to be considered in this study, all suicide subjects and none of the controls had to have a positive history of childhood abuse or severe neglect, as determined by structured interviews using the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA) [53] questionnaire adapted for psychological autopsies, as described elsewhere [54].

Genotyping of the rRNA promoter region
Genomic DNA was extracted (DNeasy, Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Primers for PCR were directed against the rRNA gene promoter (Genebank accession number U13369) using the following sequences: 59-GTG TGT CCC GGT CGT AGG-39; antisense: 59-GTC ACC GTG AGG CCA GAG-39. Primers were selected on the basis that they covered a 400bp region that included the region selected for sodium bisulfite analysis, including the regions covered by sodium bisulfite primers. The resulting PCR products for each subject were sequenced bidirectionally using the forward and the reverse primer on an ABI 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and following the manufacturer's instructions. Genetic variation was assessed throughout the rRNA promoter region used for bisulfite analysis by alignment of genomic DNA with the previously published rRNA gene promoter sequence using freely available software (CLC Workbench, CLC bio). Genomic DNA was extracted (DNeasy, Qiagen) and sodium bisulfite conversion of genomic DNA was performed as previously described [55,56] for 13 suicide subjects and 11 controls for hippocampal samples and for 4 suicide subjects and 4 controls for cerebellum samples. Primers for PCR were directed against the rRNA gene promoter using the following sequences: sense: 59-GTT TTT GGG TTG ATT AGA-39; antisense: 59-AAA ACC CAA CCT CTC C-39 [32]. Because the primers did not contain CpG dinucleotides, methylated and unmethylated sequences amplified with equal efficiency. The resulting product was excised, purified, subcloned, and transformed (TA cloning kit, Invitrogen). Individual clones were extracted and sequenced (CEQ 8800, Beckman-Coulter) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Twenty clones were sequenced for each subject from 2 to 3 independent PCR reactions. To ensure that the bisulfite conversion was complete, only clones in which all cytosine residues in non-CpG dinucleotides had been converted to thymidine were included in the analysis.

Nearest Neighbor Quantification of Methylated Cytosine Content
Genome-wide levels of 5-methylcytosine were quantified as previously described [57]. Briefly, genomic DNA from the same subjects as those used for bisulfite analysis was subjected to MBoI restriction enzyme digestion (recognition sequence: NGATCN), incubated with a 32 P-labelled oligonucleotide, loaded onto TLC phosphocellulose plates, and separated by chromatography. Reactions were repeated in triplicate. The intensities of 5methylcytosine and cytosine spot densities were analyzed using a PhosphoImager screen followed by Image Quant image analysis. For each subject, levels of methylated cytosine were tabulated as a percentage of total cytosine content, following the formula: [(5methylcytosine) 6 100]/(5-methylcytosine + cytosine).

RNA Extraction and Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRTPCR) of rRNA Gene Expression
RNA extraction was performed using Trizol (Invitrogen) followed by Dnase I treatment, and cDNA conversion was performed using random hexamer primers (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The subjects were the same as those used for the bisulfite mapping study, however, RNA samples from subjects with RNA Integrity Numbers (RINs) lower than 5.0 or brain pH less than 6.0 were excluded from analysis (N = 2 suicide subjects and N = 3 control subjects), consistent with previously described criteria for exclusion [50]. Because of the low number of remaining subjects and preliminary data indicating a trend for lower rRNA expression in the suicide subjects used for bisulfite analysis, we included an additional 5 suicide subjects (total N = 16) and 1 control subject (total N = 9) for rRNA expression analysis. Primers were directed against the rRNA gene using the following sequences: sense; 59-TTC TCT AGC GAT CTG AGA GGC GT-39, antisense; 59-TAC CAT AAC GGA GGC AGA GAC AGA-39 and GAPDH (Genebank accession number NM_002046) using the following sequences: sense; 59-GAA GGT GAA GGT CGG ACT C-39, antisense; 59-GAA GAT GGT GAT GGG ATT TC-39. A master mix, containing the cDNA, 10 mM Tris-Cl, 50 mM KCl, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 5X SYBR Green I Solution, HotStart Taq DNA polymerase (Superarray Bioscience Corporation), and 0.2 mM of the sense and antisense primers, were loaded into LightCycler capillaries (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). For the rRNA gene, the qRTPCR protocol (LightCycler Software 3.5, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) consisted of initial HotStart Taq DNA polymerase activation cycle (15 min, 95uC, with a temperature transition rate of 20uC/sec) followed by 36 cycles of denaturation (30 sec, 95uC, with a temperature transition rate set at 20uC/sec), annealing (30 sec, 55uC, with a temperature transition rate set at 20uC/sec) and elongation (30 sec, 72uC, with a temperature transition rate set at 20uC/sec). A single fluorescence reading was acquired at the end of each elongation step. Subsequently, the PCR products were melted using the following program: 95uC with a temperature transition rate of 20uC/sec, 65uC, with a temperature transition rate of 20uC/sec followed by 95uC, with a temperature transition rate of 0.1uC/sec. The presence of a single melting peak followed by analysis on 1.5% agarose gel confirmed product specificity. For the GAPDH gene, the above procedure was identical except for annealing temperatures of 51uC and 61uC during the PCR and melting steps, respectively. Reactions were repeated in triplicate. Reactions were also carried out in the absence of reverse transcriptase to verify the absence of genomic DNA contamination. To determine the relative concentrations of rRNA gene expression, a standard curve of 10-fold serial dilutions of a mixture of each of the sample cDNA was used to plot the relative Ct value for each gene on the y-axis and the amount of cDNA used on the x-axis. To calculate the fold-change, the relative amount of rRNA product was divided by the relative amount of GAPDH for each subject.

Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were carried out using Statview (Cary, NC). For DNA methylation analysis, a factorial ANOVA was carried out with the percentage of methylation as the dependent variable and group (suicide subjects and controls) as the between groups factor. The data were then subjected to Bonferroni Post-hoc analysis to examine methylation status between groups across all CpG sites. A standardized effect size and associated 95% confidence interval of the methylation differences between suicide subjects and controls was calculated for each CpG site using the difference between group means divided by a pooled standard deviation corrected for bias, according to previously described methods [58,59]. The analysis of the relationship between DNA methylation at each CpG site between suicide subjects and controls was conducted using linear regression, as were analyses of the relationships between DNA methylation, expression, PMI, brain pH, and age. To identify possible diagnostic variables influencing methylation status, factorial ANOVA followed by Bonferroni Post-hoc comparisons were used to compare groups of subjects with different clinical diagnoses. For nearest neighbor as well as rRNA expression analysis, unpaired t-tests were used to examine differences between the suicide and control groups. Data from these statistical analyses are presented as mean 6 SEM. Statistical significance was determined at P#0.05. Figure S1 The published rRNA promoter sequence U13369 is followed by the sequencing results for each subject for the region examined by sodium bisulfite mapping. The base pair length of each sequence is listed on the right side and the consensus sequence at the bottom of the sequencing results. Found at: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002085.s001 (0.38 MB PDF)