Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Resource scheduling satisfaction at accident point.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Probability level distribution under different accident scenarios.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Coupling mechanism of fuzzy-random emergency resource demand.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Transformation process of fuzzy-stochastic demand.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Confidence level and its significance.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 5.

VEPSO Algorithmic framework.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Emergency resource inventory at rescue bases.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Information between emergency rescue bases and accident point.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Fuzzy-random resource demands from accident point and their fuzzy expectation.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Optimal emergency resource scheduling scheme under different credibility confidence levels.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Algorithm parameters and simulation results.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Results of the Friedman test of median ranks.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Multi-resource satisfaction evaluation at different confidence levels in different accident level scenarios.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Sensitivity analysis of resource requirements at a fixed confidence level.

More »

Table 9 Expand