Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Unit costs.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Baseline patient characteristics at randomization.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Incremental cost-effectiveness results of cast treatment compared with surgery (surgery as reference).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Mean costs per cost category (€, per patient).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 1.

Cost-effectiveness analyses for PRWE (societal perspective).

(a) Cost-effectiveness plane with incremental costs (€) on the y-axis and incremental effects (ΔPRWE) on the x-axis; dots represent bootstrap replications and the red dot the mean; the dashed line marks the non-inferiority margin (14 PRWE points). (b) Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) for superiority, showing the probability that cast treatment is cost-effective across willingness-to-pay thresholds. (c) CEAC for non-inferiority, showing the probability that cast treatment is non-inferior to surgery across willingness-to-pay thresholds.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Cost-effectiveness analyses for QALYs (societal perspective).

(a) Cost-effectiveness plane with incremental costs (€) on the y-axis and incremental effects (ΔQALYs) on the x-axis; dots represent bootstrap replications and the red dot the mean; the dashed line marks the non-inferiority margin (0.074 QALYs). (b) Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) for superiority, showing the probability that cast treatment is cost-effective across willingness-to-pay thresholds (€/QALY gained). (c) CEAC for non-inferiority, showing the probability that cast treatment is non-inferior to surgery across willingness-to-pay thresholds.

More »

Fig 2 Expand