Table 1.
Implementation strategies identified for the successful implementation of FCM.
Fig 1.
Number of SHPs at baseline and endline.
SHPs, Skilled Health Personnel; FCM, Ferric Carboxymaltose.
Table 2.
Characteristics of survey respondents (SHP) at baseline and endline.
Fig 2.
Acceptability and feasibility of FCM utilisation for IDA treatment among skilled health personnel.
FCM, Ferric Carboxymaltose; IDA, Iron Deficiency Anaemia.
Table 3.
The comparison of the AIM and FIM scores by cadre, state and facility level.
Fig 3.
Comparison of mean AIM and FIM scores at baseline and endline among matched SHPs (n = 20).
AIM, Acceptability of Intervention Measures; FIM, Feasibility of Intervention Measures; SD, Standard Deviation; CI, Confidence Interval. AIM mean difference: 1.6 (95% CI: 0.6–2.6). FIM mean difference: 1.1 (95% CI: −0.1–2.3). Error bars show SD.