Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The flow chart of the MSIBWO algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Benchmark functions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The parameter settings for each algorithm.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Test results.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The results of Friedman test.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Convergence curves for unimodal function test.

(a): Convergence curves of seven algorithms for F1. (b): Convergence curves of seven algorithms for F2. (c): Convergence curves of seven algorithms for F3. (d): Convergence curves of seven algorithms for F4.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Convergence curves for multimodal function test.

(a): Convergence curves of seven algorithms for F5. (b): Convergence curves of seven algorithms for F6. (c): Convergence curves of seven algorithms for F7. (d): Convergence curves of seven algorithms for F8.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of computational complexity of algorithms.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Model of electrohydraulic servo actuator.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Half-vehicle model.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The FOPID parameter optimization flow chart based on the MSIBWO algorithm.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The control system for the electrohydraulic servo actuator.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 6.

The parameters of the electrohydraulic servo actuator.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 8.

The iterative curves of the algorithms.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 7.

The values corresponding to the three controllers.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 9.

Dynamic force-response curve of the system under step signal.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 8.

The system response performance indicators.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Test results for step response.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Results of Kruskal-Wallis test under step signal.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 10.

The force-response curves of the system under different frequency sine signals.

(a) The force-response curve of the system at a sine signal frequency of 0.1 Hz. (b) The force-response curve of the system at a sine signal frequency of 0.5 Hz. (c) The force-response curve of the system at a sine signal frequency of 1.0 Hz. (d) The force-response curve of the system at a sine signal frequency of 2.0Hz. (e) The force-response curve of the system at a sine signal frequency of 4.0 Hz.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 11.

The RMSE for the system under different frequency sine signals.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Test results for sine response.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Results of Kruskal-Wallis test under sine signals.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Fig 11.

The force-response curves of the system with external disturbance forces.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

The force-tracking error curves.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 14.

The RMSE for the system under the different controllers.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Fig 13.

The half-vehicle model is established in MATLAB/Simulink.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 15.

The parameters of the half-vehicle model.

More »

Table 15 Expand

Fig 14.

The vertical acceleration curve of the vehicle body.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

The pitch acceleration curve of the vehicle body.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 16.

The ride comfort indicators.

More »

Table 16 Expand