Table 1.
Vision Zero 7 Golden Rules and 14 proactive leading indicators for SHW [16].
Fig 1.
Phases and Steps of the study.
Table 2.
Converting linguistic terms into IVF membership degrees.
Fig 2.
The influence-dependence chart [17].
Fig 3.
The intersection area between the SR and the DR.
Table 3.
Converting linguistic terms to triangular fuzzy numbers.
Fig 4.
The design range, the system range, and the intersection region.
Table 4.
Grading of SHW indicators based on frequency of activities [16].
Table 5.
The results of determining and prioritizing the importance and weight of SHW indicators using the HFBWM method.
Table 6.
Matrix (D~).
Table 7.
The sum of the upper limit of the rows and the maximum value.
Table 8.
matrix.
Table 9.
Separation of the upper and lower limits of the matrix.
Table 10.
An example of calculations to exponentiate the matrix .
Table 11.
TL matrix.
Table 12.
TU matrix.
Table 13.
The vectors obtained from r^̃ and c^̃, their average and weight obtained from IVHF- DEMATEL.
Table 14.
The results of the combined weights of HFBWM and IVHF- DEMATEL and their prioritization.
Fig 5.
The influence- dependence chart with cut-off point values (averages).
Fig 6.
The influence- dependence chart according to the optimistic scenario (a) and the pessimistic scenarios (b).
Table 15.
DR values.
Table 16.
Calculation results of system range (SR) and common range (CR).
Fig 7.
Common range, design range and system range.
Table 17.
Calculation results of the information content of the alternatives.
Table 18.
Information content and ranking of alternatives.
Table 19.
The results of SHW indicators status based on the IAM-VZPLI.
Fig 8.
The results of evaluating of safety, health and wellbeing aspects in the studied petrochemical companies with IAM-VZPL.
Table 20.
Comparison of ranking of the companies based EMA-VZPLI and IAM-VZPLI.
Fig 9.
Comparative chart of prioritization of IAM-VZPLI model and EMA-VZPLI model.