Fig 1.
Overall design of the structure-constrained attention network (SCAnet).
Table 1.
The structure of G1.
Fig 2.
Problems in calculating the similarity with the CA method.
Fig 3.
SCA structure.
Fig 4.
Example of image repair errors.
Fig 5.
SCAP structure.
Table 2.
Results for different values of i.
Table 3.
Comparison of the results for different mask ratios.
Fig 6.
Comparison of the mural restoration results obtained by the different models.
Fig 7.
Results for the different sketches.
Fig 8.
Results with and without Ledge.
Fig 9.
Results with the CA and SCA modules.
Fig 10.
Results with and without the SCAP module.
Fig 11.
Results for real damaged murals.
Fig 12.
Comparison of the subjective and objective evaluation scores of the restoration results for real damaged murals.
(a) shows the MOS value of the similarity between the structure and sketch, and (b) shows the MOS value of the texture restoration result.
Table 4.
Subjective evaluation and quantitative results for the restoration of real damaged murals.