Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Systematic workflow of the study design.

Each colour represents the specific step which can be recognized by the colour scheme given in the right panel.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of selected CTL epitopes for envelope and nucleoprotein of Hantavirus.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of Helper T-cell epitopes selected for envelope and nucleoprotein of Hantavirus using the IEDB MHC-II module.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results of ABCPred: Summary of linear B cell epitopes.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Topological representation of the vaccine constructs.

(a) represent the topological architecture of the Env-Vac construct from envelope polyprotein, (b) represent the topological arrangement of the predicted epitopes from nucleoprotein NP-Vac construct while (c) represents the topological organization of the epitopes from different proteins named as Com-Vac.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Structural modeling and epitopes mapping for each construct.

(A) represent the 3D structure of envelope protein-based MEVC where different colour represent different epitopes. (B) represent the 3D structure of envelope protein-based MEVC where different colour represent different epitopes. (C) represent the 3D structure of envelope protein-based MEVC where different colour represent different epitopes.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Structural validation of the modeled vaccine constructs.

(A-C) show the Ramachandran plots for all the designed vaccine constructs. (D-E) show the ProSA-web results for all the designed vaccine constructs.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Secondary structural elements distribution in each vaccine construct.

(A) show the secondary structure for Env-Vac, (B) show the SS for NP-Vac while (C) show the SS for Com-Vac.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Solubility analysis of each vaccine construct.

(A) show the solubility graph for Env-Vac, (B) show the solubility graph for NP-Vac and (C) show the solubility graph for Com-Vac.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

The physiochemical properties of constructed vaccines.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 7.

The predicted conformational B cell epitopes for each vaccine construct.

(a-d) shows the CBCEs in Env-Vac, (e-i) shows the CBCEs in NP-Vac while (j-n) show the CBCEs in Com-Vac.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 5.

The predicted B cell conformational epitopes with their residues, size and scrores.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 8.

Interaction pattern of the designed vaccine constructs and TLR3.

(a-b) show the binding mode of Env-Vac with TLR3, (c-d) show the interaction pattern of NP-Vac-TLR3 and (e-f) show the interaction pattern of com-Vac with TLR3.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 6.

Summary of binding free energies for docked complexes (Multi-Epitopes Vaccine constructs-TLR3).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 9.

Cloning the optimized vaccine sequences into the pET28a (+) expression system.

(a) envelope vaccine sequence was cloned into the pET28a (+) vector, (b) nucleoprotein vaccine sequence was cloned into the pET28a (+) vector, (c) protein-wide vaccine sequence was cloned into the pET28a (+) vector.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Immune simulation of the designed vaccine against the Hantavirus.

(a-c) show the predicted antibodies response after three doses while (d-f) show the secondary immune elements response upon the injection.

More »

Fig 10 Expand